Claim for Independence Determinants of Secessionism in the European Union

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Claim for Independence Determinants of Secessionism in the European Union Claim for Independence Determinants of Secessionism in the European Union Abstract Why do regions within a country want to secede, which are the factors that drive these proclaims? The regions face a trade-off between different forces. The “centripetal” forces, which are acting for the region to remain in the same country and the “centrifugal” forces, which are acting to secede the region from the country. Only the regions where the centrifugal forces overpass the centripetal forces are willing to pay the independence cost. In this thesis, I present the different factors (i.e. wealth, ethno-cultural factors and historical factors) that may make the electorate of a region support the claim for secession. By analyzing 128 elections in the lower chambers of the European Union countries using data on the regional GDPs, the historical languages and the independence history of the regions, the paper shows that these factors foster secessionist movements. Keywords: Secessionism, wealth, language. Master thesis. MSc International Economics & Business 18 June, 2019 Lluc Areny Naves S3724255 [email protected] [email protected] University of Groningen Supervisor Prof. Dr. H. H. (Bart) van Ark Index Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………1 Literature review………………………………………………………………………………3 Hypothesis……………………………………………………………………………………..8 “Wealth” hypothesis 8 Ethno-cultural hypothesis 8 Historical Independence hypothesis 9 Data and variables……………………………………………………………………………11 Dependent variable “Vote share” 11 Independent variables 12 Control variables 13 Methodology………………………………………………………………………………….16 Model 16 Estimation 17 Results………………………………………………………………………………………...19 Predictions……………………………………………………………………………………22 Robustness……………………………………………………………………………………24 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………26 Datasets………………………………………………………………………………………27 References………………………………………………………………………………........27 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………………...29 Appendix 1 29 Appendix 2 30 Appendix 3 32 Introduction After the dissolution of the Soviet Union (1991) and the Yugoslav wars (1991-2001), it seemed that the different regions of Europe had achieved a national state stability (Fukuyama, 1992). However, after almost two decades of solid recovery and growth driven by innovation, globalization. In recent years populations in various European regions have showed a desire to pursue their own identity by searching new ways of becoming independent of the national states they are currently part of. For instance, Kosovo became independent from Serbia in 2008, while the European Union did fail to recognize it as a new state because some of the member states refused to do so. This poses a dilemma: the European regions that form part of the European Union and want to secede will be recognize by the European Union and its national states. After the independence of Kosovo the secessionist proclaims have increased in some regions like Scotland or Catalonia. Scotland held a referendum in 2014 asking to the people “Should Scotland be an independent country?”. Were the scots who voted answered by 55,3% “no vote”. Nevertheless, due to recent events related to Brexit, in which the UK is going to leave the European Union, the Scottish parliament may want to repeat the referendum. Catalonia finds itself in a different situation. Since 2012 the various regional governments of Catalonia have attempted to achieve a referendum pact with the government of Spain. However, the different Spanish governments did not allow any pact. Taking the cases of Scotland and Catalonia as an example, this paper addresses some of the critical reasons behind secessionist movements across the European Union. The economic literature has suggested an economic explanation to secessionist sentiments. The richer or poorer regions want to secede from the central state because of a trade-off produced between the “centrifugal” and “centripetal” forces. The centripetal forces work for maintaining the country unite and the centrifugal work for separate the country. (Alesina & Spolaore, 2003) In addition to, the economic explanation, cultural or historic differences between the regions and the central state can also play a role on the electorate. Creating a steeper difference on the preferences of the citizens in the different regions of a state (Desmet et al, 2011) Finally, the thesis wants to show the main factors, which make some regions in the European Union of the 21st century, have public support for independence. 1 The paper is organized as it follows. The first part will consist on a literature review, which will present the main contribution of the economic theories about secessionism and its models. The second part presents the hypotheses. Thirdly, the Data and Variables chapter explain the inputs used in our regression model. The fourth part presents the specification and the tobit model that is used to fit the data. The fifth chapter will present the outcomes of the regressions. The sixth part contrasts the predictions of our model with the actual electon results. The seventh part consists of two different robustness checks of the results. Finally, the conclusion is presented. Figure 1. Results of secessionist movements in Europe in the last elections. Results of the secessionists movements, with more than 10% of the vote share in its regions, in the last elections. France (2017), United Kingdom (2017), Spain (2016), Belgium (2014), Italy (2013). Source: Kollman, K., Hicken, A., Caramani, D., Backer, D., & Lublin, D. (2018). Constituency-level elections archive (CLEA). Own elaboration. 2 Literature Review The literature of secession and independence have different results and arguments when it’s applied to countries with non-democratic governments or countries with democratic governments. In this thesis, I will focus on the “democratic” governments because my study is focused on the European Union, assuming that the European Union member states are democratic states. Foley (1967), Romer (1975) and Roberts (1977) initiated the economic theory of secession in the 1970s. Their theories focus on regional conflicts over fiscal policy that arise from different income contributions of the regions to the central state and the redistribution of those contributions between the regions by the central state. According to the theory, the role of the government is reduced to the provision of public and private goods determined through the voting behavior of the citizens of the state. In the central state, poor citizens favor a policy of high income tax rate while rich citizens favor a policy of low income tax rate. The equilibrium of this income tax rate is reached by using the theory of the median voter1, according to which the preferred tax of the majority will be imposed on the state. Naturally, the equilibrium of this tax rate will not coincide with the preferences of some of the individual regions. As a consequence, this will create a conflict between the central state and the regions who do not agree with the equilibrium tax proposed. The conflict can result in the separation of the region from the central state, because removing the institutional constrains of the union allows the institutions of the region to create new policies closer to the wishes of its voters. (Bolton & Roland, 1997) The above argument was summarized by Alesina and Spolaore (2003). Who aim to determine which is the optimal size of countries. In the book, the force called “centrifugal force” refers to the force which accounts for the fact that large countries face more heterogeneous populations. In addition to the public goods argument, they found another force, which they define “centripetal”, this force can explain why the regions want to be united in one state. The centripetal force is explained by economies of scale, which benefit the region and the central state. In contrast the “centrifugal” forces are a handicap for the central state. Inevitably, these 1 The median voter theorem, which was develop by Anthony Downs in 1957, is an attempt to explain why parties on both ends of the scenario tend to gravitate towards the center. Downs, as well as economist Duncan Black, who proposed the theory in 1948, argue that politicians take political positions near the center in order to appeal to as many potential voters as possible. Under certain assumptions, the median voter wins. 3 two forces create a tradeoff that takes place it in the regions that want to secede. (Alesina & Spolaore, 2003) Alesina & Spolaore (1997) explain secessionism using a spatial differentiation model. The model induces some heterogeneity in the individual preferences of the public goods by assuming that the world consists in a line where the inhabitants are distributed uniformly. Countries correspond to a continuous subset of cuts of this line or segment. The political borders and country sizes are endogenously determined. In each country, a public good is provided in a fixed quantity and the location of this public good is determined by the majority of the votes. Applying the median voter theorem and with the assumption that individuals are uniformly distributed, the center of the country will be where we locate the public good, so individuals who are not living in the center of the country will face transportation cost. Although the location of the public good is the fairest, it will imply that the people who are living on the borders of the country will be indifferent with living in one country or another. Finally, secession is associated
Recommended publications
  • List of Members of the European Parliament, 2014–2019
    List of members of the European Parliament, 2014–2019 Below is a list of Members of the European Parliament serving in the eighth term (2014–2019). It is sorted by an English perception of surname treating all variations of de/di/do, van/von, Ó/Ní, and so forth as part of the collation key, even if this is not the normal practice in a member's own country. During the 2014–19 term, there are 751 members of parliament divided among the 28 member states. Contents List of members Austria Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Results of the election: Finland GUE/NGL G-EFA EPP EFDD France S&D ALDE ECR NI Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom Members of the European Parliament who are also citizen of a non-EU country Notes See also List of members Austria On the Austrian People's Party list: (EPP Group) On the Freedom Party list: (Non-inscrits, since 15 June 2015 ENF) 1. Othmar Karas 2. Elisabeth Köstinger – until 8 November 1. Harald Vilimsky 2017[1] 2. Franz Obermayr Lukas Mandl – since 30 November 2017 3. Georg Mayer 3. Paul Rübig 4. Barbara Kappel 4. Claudia Schmidt On The Greens – The Green Alternative list: (Greens- 5. Heinz K. Becker EFA) On the Social Democratic Party of Austria list: (S&D) 1. Ulrike Lunacek – until 8 November 2017[3] 1. Eugen Freund Thomas Waitz – since 10 November 2017 2. Evelyn Regner 2. Michel Reimon 3. Jörg Leichtfried – until 23 June 2015[2] 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Basque Political Systems
    11m_..... ·· _~ ~ - -= ,_.... ff) • ' I I -' - i ~ t I V Center for Basque Studies - University of Nevada, Reno BASQUE POLITICS SERIES Center for Basque Studies Basque Politics Series, No. 2 Basque Political Systems Edited by Pedro Ibarra Güell and Xabier Irujo Ametzaga Translated by Cameron J. Watson Center for Basque Studies University of Nevada, Reno Reno, Nevada This book was published with generous financial support from the Basque government. Center for Basque Studies Basque Politics Series, No. 2 Series Editor: Xabier Irujo Ametzaga Center for Basque Studies University of Nevada, Reno Reno, Nevada 89557 http://basque.unr.edu Copyright © 2011 by the Center for Basque Studies All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Cover and Series design © 2011 Jose Luis Agote. Cover Illustration: Juan Azpeitia Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Basque political systems / edited by Pedro Ibarra G?ell, and Xabier Irujo Ametzaga ; translated by Cameron J. Watson. p. cm. -- (Basque politics series ; No. 2) Includes index. Summary: “Collection of articles on the Basque political system within its own context and larger national and global contexts”--Provided by publisher. ISBN 978-1-935709-03-9 (pbk.) 1. País Vasco (Spain)--Politics and government. I. Ibarra Güell, Pedro. II. Irujo Ame- tzaga, Xabier. JN8399.P342B37 2011 320.446’6--dc22 2011001811 CONTENTS Introduction .......................................................................... 7 PEDRO IBARRA GÜELL and XABIER IRUJO AMETZAGA 1. Hegoalde and the Post-Franco Spanish State ................................... 13 XABIER IRUJO AMETZAGA 2. Political Institutions in Hegoalde................................................ 33 MIKEL IRUJO AMETZAGA 3. Political Institutions and Mobilization in Iparralde ............................. 53 IGOR AHEDO GURRUTXAGA 4. Fiscal Pacts in Hegoalde ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Przegląd Europejski 2019/4
    P R Z E G L A˛ D 4/2019 EUROPEJSKI Energy security in Europe 4 Need for changes in the EU’s legislation 2019 PRZEGLA˛D EUROPEJSKI PRZEGLA˛D www.wuw.pl Przeglad Europejski 4-2019.indd All Pages 12/02/20 10:24 P R Z E G L A˛ D EUROPEJSKI 35=(*/$Þ' 35=(*/$Þ' EUROPEJSKI EUROPEJSKI 'I^TMIG^IĐWX[SIRIVKIX]G^RI *RIVK]WIGYVMX]MR*YVSTI [*YVSTMI 4 3IIHJSVGLERKIW 4 5SXV^IFE^QMER 2019 MRXLI*9ưWPIKMWPEXMSR 2019 [TVE[SHE[WX[MI9* ;EVW^E[E 2019 35=(*/$Þ' EUROPEJSKI *RIVK]WIGYVMX]MR*YVSTI 3IIHJSVGLERKIW 4 MRXLI*9ưWPIKMWPEXMSR 2019 ;EVW^E[E 2019 MIĘDZYNARODOWA RADA NAUKOWA prof. Małgorzata Ciesielska (Northumbria University Newcastle), prof. dr hab. Zbigniew Czachór (Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu), prof. Alexander Galushkin (Rosyjski Uniwersytet Przyjaźni Narodów – RUDN w Moskwie), prof. Óscar García Luengo (Uniwersytet w Granadzie), prof. dr hab. Tomasz Grosse (Uniwersytet Warszawski), doc. JUDr. Fi- lip Křepelka (Uniwersytet Masaryka), prof. dr hab. Teresa Łoś-Nowak (Uniwersytet Wrocławski), prof. José Luis Orella Martínez (Universidad CEU San Pablo Madrid), prof. Josef Melchior (Uniwersytet w Wiedniu), prof. Michael Minkenberg (Uniwersytet Viadrina we Frankfurcie nad Odrą), prof. Darko Nadić (Uniwersytet w Belgradzie), prof. Josep Mª Reniu Vilamala (Uniwersytet w Barcelonie), prof. dr hab. Janusz Ruszkowski (Uniwersytet Szczeciński), prof. dr hab. Nadezhda Samsonova (Bałtycki Federalny Uniwersytet im. Immanuela Kanta w Kaliningradzie), prof. Dieter Segert (Uniwersytet w Wiedniu), prof. Victor Shadurski (Uniwersytet w Mińsku), prof. dr hab. Ewa Stasiak-Jazukiewicz (Uniwersytet Warszaw- ski), prof. dr hab. Stanisław Sulowski (Uniwersytet Warszawski), prof. Jolanta Urbanovic (Uniwersytet Michała Römera w Wilnie), prof. Alessandro Vitale (Uniwersytet w Mediolanie), prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerakan Eurosceptic Party Terhadap Keutuhan
    GERAKAN EUROSCEPTIC PARTY TERHADAP KEUTUHAN UNI EROPA SKRIPSI Diajukan Sebagai Salah Satu Syarat Memperoleh Gelar Sarjana pada Departemen ilmu Hubungan Internasional Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin ANDI NURUL ANNISA RAMLI AS E131 14 016 JURUSAN ILMU HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK UNIVERSITAS HASANUDDIN 2018 ii iii KATA PENGANTAR Puji syukur kehadirat Allah SWT karena dengan rahmatnya penulis dapat menyelesaikan skripsi yang berjudul “Gerakan Eurosceptic Party Terhadap Keutuhan Uni Eropa” sebagai syarat kelulusan dalam program studi Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Hasanuddin. Terlepas dari segala kekurangan yang terdapat di dalamnya, penulis berharap tulisan ini dapat memberikan kontribusi tambahan ke dalam pemahaman setiap orang yang membutuhkan informasi mengenai pembahasan terkait. Skripsi ini didedikasikan terkhusus kepada Ayahanda tercinta Ramli Andi Saripada serta Ibunda tercinta Nikmah dan juga Andi Nurul Safitri serta keluarga besar yang tanpa lelah telah memberikan dukungan materil maupun moril sehingga penulis dapat tetap termotivasi untuk mendapatkan gelar sarjana ini. Dalam Penyusunan dan penulisan skripsi ini tidak terlepas dari bantuan, bimbingan serta dukungan dari berbagai pihak. Oleh karena itu dalam kesmpatan ini penulis dengan senang hati menyampaikan terimakasih kepada yang terhormat: 1. Ibu Rektor Universitas Hasanuddin beserta jajarannya. 2. Bapak Dekan Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin beserta jajarannya. 3. Bapak H. Darwis, MA, Ph.D selaku Ketua Jurusan Ilmu Hubungan Internasional dan juga sabagai Pembimbing I dan Bapak Aswin Baharuddin, S.IP, MA selaku Pembimbing II yang telah dengan baik memberikan arahan kepada penulis sehingga skripsi ini dapat terselesaikan dengan sesuai harapan. 4. Seluruh dosen Ilmu Hubungan Internasional yang telah membagikan ilmu serta pengalamannya.
    [Show full text]
  • Right Wing Populism in Europe: a Discoursive Rhetoric Focused on European Union, Ethno-Nationalism, Democracy and Globalization
    RIGHT WING POPULISM IN EUROPE(DE CUETO NOGUERAS) Article RIGHT WING POPULISM IN EUROPE: A DISCOURSIVE RHETORIC FOCUSED ON EUROPEAN UNION, ETHNO-NATIONALISM, DEMOCRACY AND GLOBALIZATION DE CUETO NOGUERAS, Carlos Key words: Right-wing parties, populism, Euroscepticism, ethno-nationalism, democracy, globalization. 1. POPULISM IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND POLITICAL ANALYSIS. Despite the fact that the term “populism” is highly ambivalent, it is increasingly used in the social sciences and has become a particular field in political analysis, without being precisely defined. Populism is a particular political rhetoric, which extremely simplifies complex problems and offers apparently easy, painless but at the same time vague solutions. However, due to the negative connotation of the term, far-right populist parties prefer to define themselves to be centrists, reject most of labels normally associated with them -con- servative, right-wing, racist, xenophobic- and threaten to take legal actions or denounce in some cases media companies and journalists who do. After a Swedish journalist of Sveriges Radion called the Sweden Democrats party xenophobic in 2013, the party reacted with a complaint lodged to the broadcasting regulator. In 2014, the Supreme Court of Hungary ruled that Jobbik couldn’t be labelled “far-right” in any domestic radio or television transmission. They present themselves as common men and women who understand and represent people, especially the under-privileged and under-represented segments, who know and voice their concerns, in contrast to the corrupt and established elites. Populism relies on charismatic leaders with decisive roles in their parties and on popular support. Populism respects the basic criteria of democracy but rejects all existing ideologies as insufficient for the particular society and tries to find and adopt its “own new path”.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesis Doctoral
    TESIS DOCTORAL 2015 LOS NUEVOS INSTRUMENTOS DE COMUNICACIÓN POLÍTICA: EL USO DE YOUTUBE EN LAS CAMPAÑAS ELECTORALES EN ESPAÑA, 2010-2014 Alberto Prieto Rodríguez Licenciado en Derecho DEPARTAMENTO DE CIENCIA POLÍTICA Y DE LA ADMINISTRACIÓN FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS POLÍTICAS Y SOCIOLOGÍA Directora: Irene Delgado Sotillos TESIS DOCTORAL 2015 LOS NUEVOS INSTRUMENTOS DE COMUNICACIÓN POLÍTICA: EL USO DE YOUTUBE EN LAS CAMPAÑAS ELECTORALES EN ESPAÑA, 2010-2014 Alberto Prieto Rodríguez Licenciado en Derecho DEPARTAMENTO DE CIENCIA POLÍTICA Y DE LA ADMINISTRACIÓN FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS POLÍTICAS Y SOCIOLOGÍA Directora: Irene Delgado Sotillos 1 DEPARTAMENTO DE CIENCIA POLÍTICA Y DE LA ADMINISTRACIÓN FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS POLÍTICAS Y SOCIOLOGÍA LOS NUEVOS INSTRUMENTOS DE COMUNICACIÓN POLÍTICA: EL USO DE YOUTUBE EN LAS CAMPAÑAS ELECTORALES EN ESPAÑA, 2010-2014 Alberto Prieto Rodríguez Licenciado en Derecho Directora: Irene Delgado Sotillos 2015 2 3 INDICE LISTA DE TABLAS 6 INTRODUCCIÓN 8 Capítulo 1. TECNOLOGÍA Y POLÍTICA 27 Capítulo 2. PROPUESTA PARA EL ESTUDIO DEL IMPACTO DE LAS NUEVAS TECNOLOGÍAS EN EL CONTEXTO ELECTORAL 41 2.1. Rasgos del contexto electoral 41 2.2. Criterios de selección de los casos de análisis 42 Capítulo 3. APLICACIÓN DE LAS NUEVAS TECNOLOGÍAS EN LAS CAMPAÑAS ELECTORALES 54 3.1. El formato audiovisual 59 3.2. La interacción 67 3.3. La dimensión YouTube 72 3.4. Los indicadores de YouTube 77 Capítulo 4. EL ESCENARIO ELECTORAL EN ESPAÑA: 2010 – 2014 82 4.1 El escenario electoral: 2010-2014 82 4.2 El empleo de las TIC por partidos políticos 86 4.3 Partidos y candidatos. Personalización política en Internet 88 Capítulo 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties and Terrorism: Why Ban Batasuna?
    Political Parties and Terrorism: Why ban Batasuna? By Angela K. Bourne Politics, School of Humanities, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN [email protected], phone: +44(0)1382 388628 Paper presented at Elections, Public Opinion and Parties Annual Conference University of Exeter, 9-11 September 2010 Abstract This article examines the 2003 ban of radical Basque nationalist parties Herri Batasuna, Euskal Herritarrok and Batasuna for their integration in the terrorist group Euskadi Ta Askatasuna. It does so by examining the political context in which proscription took place and testing two hypotheses developed from the broader literature on party bans addressing the question: Why do democracies ban political parties? Case study analysis on Spain supports the two hypotheses - that democracies ban anti-system parties when alternative forms of marginalization are not effective and that ‘intolerant democracies’ are more likely to ban political parties than ‘tolerant democracies’. 1 Introduction In 2003, the Spanish Supreme Court banned Herri Batasuna (HB), Euskal Herritarrok (EH) and Batasuna, three Basque separatist parties linked to the terrorist group Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA). Since then, the return of Batasuna - effectively successor to both HB and EH - to electoral politics under a different guise has been repeatedly blocked by the courts. The effects of proscription are far-reaching. A banned party may no longer contest elections, loses all entitlements such as access to state funding, and its assets are to be confiscated and sold off by the state (Vírgala, 2003-4: 622). Prior to proscription, ETA’s political wing (henceforth Batasuna) contested elections over some twenty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Excerpt HERE
    8 When History Breathed Down Our Necks In the trial of the past before the future, contemporary memoirs are testimony, history is the judge, and the verdict is almost always iniquitous, whether owing to the falseness of depositions, or their absence, or the ignorance of the court. Fortunately, it is open to appeal, and the light of new centuries, projected from afar on centuries past, denounces this judgement of the shadows. – Auguste Blanqui One must be modest enough to tell oneself that the moment in which one lives is not the unique, fundamental or eruptive moment of history, on the basis of which everything reaches a culmination or begins again. – Michel Foucault, 1983 For Michel Foucault, ‘the urgency of posing the question of the subject differently’ was the point at which such authors as Althusser, Lacan and himself converged, all charged with ‘structuralism’ despite their denials. According to Foucault, what mattered was to challenge the supremacy of the sovereign subject that then reigned over European philosophy by way of phenomenology or existentialism. With the general strike, this subject repressed by structure resur- faced and suddenly proved its strength. In a spectacular reversal, interest turned once more to the ungraspable fl uxes of a desiring subjectivity. Foucault, a great deconstructor of the classic subject, set out to explore the manner in which the subject is constituted by way of its resistances to ‘practices of subjugation’.1 After a century of defeats and betrayals, the defeated would fi nally have the right to revenge and reparations: 99781781681084781781681084 AnAn ImpatientImpatient LifeLife (834h)(834h) 1st1st revisedrevised proof.inddproof.indd 8989 004/10/20134/10/2013 112:08:462:08:46 90 An Impatient Life Things really are starting to shake, The bad days will come to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • A TTIP Resolution for People, the Environment and Democracy
    For a TTIP resolution that puts people, the environment and democracy before short-term profit and disproportionate corporate rights Dear Member of the European Parliament, In light of the European Parliament’s ongoing work on a resolution on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership TTIP (also known as Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement or TAFTA), we are writing as an EU-wide coalition of 375 civil society organisations who share a deep concern about the various threats posed by the agreement. We represent a wide range of public interests including environmental protection, public health, civil rights, agriculture, consumer rights and protection of food and farming standards, animal welfare, social and labour standards, workers’ rights, migrant rights, unemployment, youth and women's issues, development, public access to information and digital rights, essential public services including education, integrity of financial systems, and others. We welcome the fact that the European Parliament is forming its opinion on the TTIP and the role that the Parliament has already played in organising democratic public debates on the issue. We call on all MEPs to agree on a strong resolution that makes clear that the European Parliament will reject any future trade or investment agreements that will not serve the public interest and threaten important rights acquired in long democratic struggles in the EU, US and the rest of the world. For this purpose, we would like to share with you our key demands on the TTIP negotiations, which we developed together with our partners in the US and which were first released in a joint civil society statement in May 20141: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Podemos and the Conquest of the Skies
    Przegląd Europejski vol. 2019, no. 4 doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.7893 Podemos and the conquest of the skies José Luis Orella Martínez, Universidad CEU San Pablo de Madrid ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2727-5955 Abstract The article deals with the establishment by several professors of the Complutense University of a leftist political movement. Its name is Podemos, and it is a political movement that emerged from 15-M movement, based on different groups of left-wing and claim struggle, and it inaugurated a platform, that had a strong role in shaping the Spanish left, assuming a plurinational, feminist, antimilitarist and favorable speech to the new Bolivarian left. Keywords: Podemos, 21st century socialism, new left, Pablo Iglesias Podemos i podbój nieba Streszczenie Artykuł poświęcony jest założeniu przez kilku profesorów z Uniwersytetu Complutense lewicowego ruchu politycznego. Nosi on nazwę Podemos, i jest to ruch polityczny, który narodził się z ruchu 15-M, na bazie różnych ugrupowań należących do lewicy oraz walki poglądów, inaugurując platformę, która odegrała ważną rolę w kształtowaniu hiszpańskiej lewicy, przyjmując narrację wielonarodową, feministyczną, antymilitarystyczną i przychylną dla nowej lewicy boliwariańskiej. Słowa kluczowe: Podemos, socjalizm XXI wieku, nowa lewica, Pablo Iglesias 124 José Luis Orella Martínez Podemos is a recent formation that emerged as a political projection of the revolts that arose in 15-M movement. The article aims to describe its components and its short electoral history. Its elaboration intends to relate it to the other formations of the Euro- pean radical left, it is not an exclusively Spanish factor, and at the ideological level it does not respond to an apolitical protest movement, but most of its leaders had a long trajectory of connection with organizations of the extreme left.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2014 RESEARCH PAPER 14/32 11 June 2014
    European Parliament Elections 2014 RESEARCH PAPER 14/32 11 June 2014 Elections to the European Parliament were held across the 28 states of the European Union between 22 and 25 May 2014. The UK elections were held concurrently with council elections in England and Northern Ireland on 22 May. The UK now has 73 MEPs, up from 72 at the last election, distributed between 12 regions. UKIP won 24 seats, Labour 20, the Conservatives 19, and the Green Party three. The Liberal Democrats won only one seat, down from 11 at the 2009 European election. The BNP lost both of the two seats they had won for the first time at the previous election. UKIP won the popular vote overall, and in six of the nine regions in England. Labour won the popular vote in Wales and the SNP won in Scotland. Across the UK as a whole turnout was 35%. Across Europe there was an increase in the number of seats held by Eurosceptic parties, although more centrist parties in established pro-European groups were still in the majority. The exact political balance of the new Parliament depends on the formation of the political groups. Turnout across the EU was 43%. It was relatively low in some of the newer Member States. Part 1 of this paper presents the full results of the UK elections, including regional analysis and local-level data. Part 2 presents a summary of the results across the EU, together with country-level summaries based on data from official national sources. Oliver Hawkins Vaughne Miller Recent Research Papers 14/22 Accident & Emergency Performance: England 2013/14.
    [Show full text]
  • European Network for the Fair Sharing of Working Time
    European network for the fair sharing of working time 0 Presentation brochure 2018 2 Why is this network needed? Societies have set decisive steps in radically reducing the working time of their people over the course of time. Helped by massive increases in productivity, working time in many countries has been reduced to previously unimaginable levels. This evolution, however, has slowed and even reversed in some countries while in others it continues in the form of part-time work. If creating precarious part-time jobs gives the illusion of a low unemployment rate, the multiplication of small contracts has the main effect of impoverishing employees, especially women. Evolution towards a collective decrease in working time has certainly slowed, but this does not mean there are no good (and less good) reasons for a further decrease in working time. Decreasing the time spent at work is seen as at least a partial solution for such long-standing problems as unemployment, gender inequality, unsustainable economics, the ageing population, the burn-out epidemic, work-related health hazards and many more. Working time reduction is a (more or less) promising solution for all these issues, but whether or not it will deliver depends on how the reduction in working time is put into practice. Perhaps surprisingly, there is a wealth of options between introducing simple legislation decreasing the full-time norm, on the one hand, and letting people decide for themselves to work less in the form of part-time work, on the other. What is crucial is the creativity of actors in the field in designing working time reductions centred on delivering their specific objectives.
    [Show full text]