DOCSLIB.ORG

Siniša Bilić-Dujmušić

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Siniša Bilić-Dujmušić Farska bitka The Battle of Pharos Siniša Bilić-Dujmušić Siniša Bilić-Dujmušić Hrvatsko katoličko sveučilište Catholic University of Croatia Ilica 242 Ilica 242 HR, 10000 Zagreb CROATIA, 10000 Zagreb [email protected] [email protected] UDK: 355.48(497.583Stari Grad) “-219” UDC: 355.48(497.583Stari Grad) “-219” (398Faros) (398Faros) Izvorni znanstveni članak Original scientific paper Primljeno: 30. 5. 2017. Received: 30 May 2017 Prihvaćeno: 14. 6. 2017. Accepted: 14 June 2017 Autor rekonstruira bitku koju je 219. g. pr. Kr. rim- The author reconstructs the battle waged in 219 BC ski konzul Lucije Emilije Paulo vodio protiv Deme- by Roman Consul Lucius Aemilius Paullus against trija Farskog nedaleko od grada Fara. Analizom Poli- Demetrius of Pharos near the settlement of Pharos. bijevih podataka i osvrtom na dosadašnju znanstvenu Based on an analysis of the data from Polybius and literaturu nastoji definirati slijed vojne operacije i a review of the previous scholarly literature, he at- smjestiti je na konkretan teren. Bojno polje smješta tempts to define the sequence of military operations na poluotok Kabal, a odlučnom uzvisinom smatra 50- and place them in specific locations. The battlefield 70 m visok greben koji se proteže približno sredinom was located on the Kabal Peninsula, and the 50-70 m ovog poluotoka, te rekonstruira bitku na tom položa- high ridge that extends roughly down the middle of ju. the peninsula is deemed the decisive high ground; the Razmatra posljedice koje je za Rim imao ovaj su- battle at that position is reconstructed. kob, a implicira ih Polibije, kao i posljedice za druge The repercussions this conflict had for Rome, as uključene strane. implied by Polybius, are considered, as are the conse- U mjeri u kojoj je to trenutno moguće, a na ne- quences for the other involved parties. kim mjestima i više od toga, ovaj rad će nastojati re- To the extent that it is currently feasible, and at konstruirati bitku koja se godine 219. pr. Kr. odigrala some points even beyond this, the work shall constitute 327 VAHD 110-1, 2017, 327-376 nedaleko od današnjega Staroga Grada na otoku Hva- an attempt to reconstruct the battle which was waged ru. Ta je bitka okončala doba najvećeg političkog not far from today’s town of Stari Grad on the island prosperiteta toga grada i njegov položaj glavnoga gra- of Hvar in 219 BC. This battle ended the era of the da države puno veće od grčkog polisa, čiji se utjecaj town’s greatest political prosperity and its status as prostirao preko Pelješca i Boke kotorske sve do dubo- the capital of a state much larger than a Greek po- ko u albanske planine.1 lis, with a sphere of influence extending across the Pelješac Peninsula and Boka Kotarska and deep into Ključne riječi: Far, Farska bitka, Emilije Paulo, the mountains of today’s Albania.1 Demetrije Farski, Ilirski ratovi Key Words: Pharos, Battle of Pharos, Aemilius Paullus, Demetrius of Pharos, Illyrian wars * Dedicated to Branko Kirigin. Magistro et amico libens, * Branku Kiriginu. Magistro et amico libens, merito merito 1 Jednako kao što je kasnije haranje Omišana u toj mjeri 1 Just as the later raids of Omiš pirates devastated Stari razorilo Stari Grad da je otočno središte premješteno u Grad so much that the island’s main settlement was Hvar: Skok 1950, str. 182. moved to the town of Hvar: Skok 1950, p. 182. 328 Siniša Bilić-Dujmušić, Farska bitka The Battle of Pharos Izvori Sources O problemima koje nam predstavljaju izvori o boju I have already written previously about the prob- pod Farom godine 219. pr. Kr. već smo ranije pisali.2 lems presented by the sources on the Battle at Pharos Zato ću na ovome mjestu samo sumirati problematiku in 219 BC.2So here I shall only summarize the prob- i naglasiti neke točke koje nisu bile zanimljive za te- lems and stress certain points that were not pertinent matiku ranijeg rada. to the topic of that earlier work. Drugi ilirski rat bio je prilično značajan događaj The Second Illyrian War was a rather significant u okvirima rimske povijesti 3. st. pr. Kr. i na ovaj ili event within the framework of Roman history in the onaj način spominje ga velik broj antičkih autora. No 3rd century BC, and it was mentioned in one way or njihove su bilješke o tome vrlo kratke, sabijene i ne another by numerous Classical writers. But their nota- donose puno detalja. Naime, ovaj rimski pohod u Ja- tions on it are very brief, terse and lacking in detail. dranu odigrao se simultano s izbijanjem sukoba protiv That is because this Roman push into the Adriatic pro- Hanibala na drugom kraju Sredozemlja, pa je manje ceeded at the same time as the outbreak of the conflict dramatičan obračun s Demetrijem Farskim nužno pao with Hannibal on the other side of the Mediterranean, u sjenu daleko veće i značajnije priče. Nažalost, naj- so the less dramatic confrontation with Demetrius of izdašniji izvor za koji znamo da je postojao, 20. knji- Pharos was necessarily overshadowed by a far greater ga Livijeva mega-djela Ab urbe condita, nije do nas and more important story. Unfortunately, the most ex- preživjela. Kratka bilješka koju donose sačuvane Pe- tensive source known to have existed, the twentieth riochae potpuno je neinformativna: Iliri su se ponovo book of Livy’s monumental work Ab urbe condita,has pobunili, ali su svladani. Njihova predaja bila je pri- not survived to this day. The short note contained in hvaćena.3 Za povijest naših krajeva uvijek neizbježni the preserved Periochae is entirely uninformative: Apijan donosi priču koju je malo teže uskladiti s kro- “The Illyrians revolted again, but were subdued. nologijom drugih izvora. Po njemu je Demetrije isko- Their surrender was accepted.”3 Appian, always un- ristio rimsku zauzetost ratom protiv Gala u Padskoj avoidable for the history of the lands that would later nizini i u savezu s Histrima počeo gusariti. Nakon što become Croatia, recounted a story that is difficult to ga je rimska flota svladala, pobjegao je u Makedoniju, align with the chronology of other sources. According ali se ubrzo vratio gusarenju u Jadranu pa su ga Ri- to him, Demetrius exploited the Roman preoccupa- mljani ubili i razorili njegov rodni grad Far koji je s tion with its war against the Gauls in the Po valley to njim bio povezan u zločinu.4 Po Apijanu, dakle, farska begin engaging in piracy together with the Histrians. bitka ne bi uopće spadala među događaje Drugog ilir- After the Roman fleet overcame him, he fled to Mace- skog rata, već se dogodila u nekom nespecificiranom donia, but soon returned to piracy on the Adriatic, so vremenu Demetrijeva povratka.5 that the Romans killed him and razed his native town Dion Kasije donosi nešto širu priču, ali ona stvara of Pharos, which was complicit in his crimes.4 So ac- više problema nego što ih rješava. Demetrije je, po cording to Appian, the Battle of Pharos was not even Dionu, zloupotrebljavao prijateljstvo s Rimljanima da among the events of the Second Illyrian War, rather bi napadao susjedna plemena, a kada su ga zbog toga it happened during the unspecified time when Dem- konzuli Emilije Paulo i Marko Livije pozvali preda se, etrius had returned.5 nije se odazvao, već je nastavio s napadima. Nato su Cassius Dio provided a somewhat broader story, konzuli pokrenuli vojsku na njega i napali ga na oto- but it creates more problems than it solves. Dem- ku Visu, jer su saznali da se ondje usidrio sa svojom etrius, according to Dio, misused his friendship with flotom. Poslali su mali dio rimskih brodova na drugu the Romans in order to attack neighbouring tribes, stranu otoka, a nakon što su se Iliri otisnuli kako bi and when the consuls Aemilius Paullus and Marcus napali taj laki plijen, rimska flota je neometano uplo- Livius called on him to surrender, he did not respond, vila na položaj ilirskog sidrišta i ondje postavila logor. but rather continued his raids. The consuls then sent Domorodci, bijesni što su prevareni, napali su rimski their armies against him and they attacked him on the logor, ali su odbijeni. Nakon tog poraza Demetrije island of Vis, because they learned that he had berthed 2 Bilić-Dujmušić, Milivojević 2014, str. 34-42. 2 Bilić-Dujmušić, Milivojević 2014, pp. 34-42. 3 Liv. Per., 20.13. 3 Liv. Per., 20.13. 4 App. Illyr., 8. 4 App. Illyr., 8. 5 Za detaljnu analizu Apijanove ilirske knjige vidi Do- 5 For a detailed analysis of Appian’s Illyrian book, see biáš 1930, te najnovije Šašel Kos 2005, posebno str. Dobiáš 1930, and the latest by Šašel Kos 2005, esp. pp. 267-279. 267-279. 329 VAHD 110-1, 2017, 327-376 bježi za Far, a rimska flota ga slijedi i zauzima grad, there with his fleet. They sent a small contingent of ali tek nakon što je Demetrije uspio pobjeći makedon- Roman vessels to the other side of the island, and af- skom kralju Filipu. Ovaj odbija Demetrija izručiti Ri- ter the Illyrians set off to attack this easy prey, the mljanima, no kad se Demetrije poslije vratio u Iliriju, Roman fleet sailed into the Illyrian anchorage unim- Rimljani ga uspiju zarobiti te ga pogubiše.6 peded and set up camp there. The natives, infuriated Ovu je priču teško pomiriti s onom Polibijevom at the deception, assaulted the Roman camp, but were (vidi dalje): ako čak i dopustimo mogućnost da je De- repelled. After this defeat, Demetrius fled to Pharos, metrije zagospodario Visom pa rimski napad pričekao but the Roman fleet followed him and occupied the usidren u nekoj viškoj uvali i da se neka bitka ondje town, albeit only after Demetrius had managed to es- odigrala, teško je prihvatiti da bi rimski konzul De- cape to the court of Macedonian King Phillip.
Recommended publications
  • The First Illyrian War: a Study in Roman Imperialism

    The First Illyrian War: a Study in Roman Imperialism

    The First Illyrian War: A Study in Roman Imperialism Catherine A. McPherson Department of History and Classical Studies McGill University, Montreal February, 2012 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts ©Catherine A. McPherson, 2012. Table of Contents Abstract ……………………………………………….……………............2 Abrégé……………………………………...………….……………………3 Acknowledgements………………………………….……………………...4 Introduction…………………………………………………………………5 Chapter One Sources and Approaches………………………………….………………...9 Chapter Two Illyria and the Illyrians ……………………………………………………25 Chapter Three North-Western Greece in the Later Third Century………………………..41 Chapter Four Rome and the Outbreak of War…………………………………..……….51 Chapter Five The Conclusion of the First Illyrian War……………….…………………77 Conclusion …………………………………………………...…….……102 Bibliography……………………………………………………………..104 2 Abstract This paper presents a detailed case study in early Roman imperialism in the Greek East: the First Illyrian War (229/8 B.C.), Rome’s first military engagement across the Adriatic. It places Roman decision-making and action within its proper context by emphasizing the role that Greek polities and Illyrian tribes played in both the outbreak and conclusion of the war. It argues that the primary motivation behind the Roman decision to declare war against the Ardiaei in 229 was to secure the very profitable trade routes linking Brundisium to the eastern shore of the Adriatic. It was in fact the failure of the major Greek powers to limit Ardiaean piracy that led directly to Roman intervention. In the earliest phase of trans-Adriatic engagement Rome was essentially uninterested in expansion or establishing a formal hegemony in the Greek East and maintained only very loose ties to the polities of the eastern Adriatic coast.

  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-10444-0 — Rome and the Third Macedonian War Paul J

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-10444-0 — Rome and the Third Macedonian War Paul J. Burton Index More Information Index Abdera, Greek city on the h racian coast, 15n. second year 41 , 60 , 174 political disruption sparked by Roman h ird Macedonian War embassy, 143 second year troubles with Sparta, 13 , 82n. 23 brutalized by Hortensius, 140 Acilius Glabrio, M’. (cos. 191), 44 , 59n. 12 embassy to Rome, 140 Aetolian War s.c. de Abderitis issued, 140 , see also second year Appendix C passim given (unsolicited) strategic advice by Abrupolis, king of the h racian Sapaei, 15n. 41 Flamininus, 42 attacks Macedonia (179), 58 , 81 Syrian and Aetolian Wars Acarnania, Acarnanians, 14 second year deprived of the city of Leucas (167), 177 Battle of h ermopylae, 36 – 37 First Macedonian War recovers some cities in h essaly, 36 Roman operations in (211), 25 Aelius Ligus, P. (cos. 172), 112 politicians exiled to Italy (167), 177 Aemilius Lepidus, M. (ambassador) h ird Macedonian War embassy to Philip V at Abydus (200), 28 , second year 28n. 53 political disruption sparked by Roman Aenus and Maronea, Greek cities on the embassy, 143 h racian coast, 40 , 60 , 140 , 174 two executed by the Athenians (201), 28n. 53 declared free by the senate, 46 – 47 Achaean League, Achaeans, 12 – 13 dispute between Philip V and Rome over, Achaean War (146), 194 44 – 45 , 55 , 86 , 92 , 180 Archon- Callicrates debate (175), 61 , 61n. 29 , embassy to Rome from Maronean exiles (186/ 62n. 30 , 94 – 96 5), 45 congratulated by Rome for resisting Perseus Maronean exiles address senatorial (173), 66 , 117 commission (185), 46 conquest of the Peloponnese, 13 , 82n.
  • DELIVERABLE 4 Report on the Identification of the Main Adriatic Fisheries, with Relevant Maps, Focusing on the Shared Stocks

    DELIVERABLE 4 Report on the Identification of the Main Adriatic Fisheries, with Relevant Maps, Focusing on the Shared Stocks

    MAREA MEDITERRANEAN HALIEUTIC RESOURCES EVALUATION AND ADVICE Specific Contract no 10 - SEDAF: "Improved knowledge of the main socio-economic aspects related to the most important fisheries in the Adriatic Sea” SPECIFIC CONTRACT N° 10 "IMPROVED KNOWLEDGE OF THE MAIN SOCIO- ECONOMIC ASPECTS RELATED TO THE MOST IMPORTANT FISHERIES IN THE ADRIATIC SEA (SEDAF)" DELIVERABLE 4 Report on the identification of the main Adriatic fisheries, with relevant maps, focusing on the shared stocks Responsible Giuseppe Scarcella (CNR) WP1. Fisheries identification Task 1.1 - Fishery identification demersals Task 1.2 - Fishery identification small pelagics Participants WP 1 leader and D4 responsible: Giuseppe Scarcella (CNR - Ancona) Task 1.1 leader: Nedo Vrgoč (IOF – Split) Task 1.2 leader: Ana Pešić (IMB – Kotor) CONISMA-NISEA: Dario Pinello, Evelina Sabatella IMB: Zdravko Ikica LAP: Jerina Kolitari FRIS: Bojan Marčeta December 2014 “This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission and in no way anticipates any future opinion of the Commission. Permission to copy, or reproduce the contents of this report is granted subject to citation of the source of this material. This study has been carried out with the financial assistance of the European Commission.” 1 MAREA MEDITERRANEAN HALIEUTIC RESOURCES EVALUATION AND ADVICE Specific Contract no 10 - SEDAF: "Improved knowledge of the main socio-economic aspects related to the most important fisheries in the Adriatic Sea” Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................3
  • Greece, the Land Where Myths Replaces Reality

    Greece, the Land Where Myths Replaces Reality

    GREECE, THE LAND WHERE MYTHS REPLACE REALITY (Myths about Epirus) What is myth and what does it serve? Myth is a narrative based usually on a false story which can not be used as a replacement of history, but sometimes myth might be considered a distorted account of a real historical event. The myth does not differ much from a folktale and usually the boundary between them is very thin. Myth must not be used to reconstruct, however in the ancient society of the so called “”Ancient Greeks”” myth was usually regarded as a true account for a remote past. Surprisingly this ‘tradition’ is descended to the Modern Greeks as well. They never loose the chance to use the myths and the mythology of a remote past and to pose them as their real ethnic history. This job is being done combining the ancient myths with the ones already created in the modern era. Now let’s take a look at two Greek myths, respectively one ancient and one modern, while our job is to prove that even these myths are respectively hijacked or created to join realities not related to each other, but unfortunately propagandized belonging to a real history, the history of the Greek race. Thus before we analyze and expose some of their myths which are uncountable, we are inclined to say that whatever is considered Greek History is completely based on mythical stories, whose reliability and truthiness is deeply compromised for the mere fact that is based on myths not only by the Modern Greeks and especially philhellenes, but even by the ancient authors.
  • The Antigonids and the Ruler Cult. Global and Local Perspectives?

    The Antigonids and the Ruler Cult. Global and Local Perspectives?

    The Antigonids and the Ruler Cult Global and Local Perspectives? 1 Franca Landucci DOI – 10.7358/erga-2016-002-land AbsTRACT – Demetrius Poliorketes is considered by modern scholars the true founder of ruler cult. In particular the Athenians attributed him several divine honors between 307 and 290 BC. The ancient authors in general consider these honors in a negative perspec- tive, while offering words of appreciation about an ideal sovereignty intended as a glorious form of servitude and embodied in Antigonus Gonatas, Demetrius Poliorketes’ son and heir. An analysis of the epigraphic evidences referring to this king leads to the conclusion that Antigonus Gonatas did not officially encourage the worship towards himself. KEYWORDS – Antigonids, Antigonus Gonatas, Demetrius Poliorketes, Hellenism, ruler cult. Antigonidi, Antigono Gonata, culto del sovrano, Demetrio Poliorcete, ellenismo. Modern scholars consider Demetrius Poliorketes the true founder of ruler cult due to the impressively vast literary tradition on the divine honours bestowed upon this historical figure, especially by Athens, between the late fourth and the early third century BC 2. As evidenced also in modern bib- liography, these honours seem to climax in the celebration of Poliorketes as deus praesens in the well-known ithyphallus dedicated to him by the Athenians around 290 3. Documentation is however pervaded by a tone that is strongly hostile to the granting of such honours. Furthermore, despite the fact that it has been handed down to us through Roman Imperial writers like Diodorus, Plutarch and Athenaeus, the tradition reflects a tendency contemporary to the age of the Diadochi, since these same authors refer, often explicitly, to a 1 All dates are BC, unless otherwise stated.
  • Chronological Chart of the Second Temple Period†

    Chronological Chart of the Second Temple Period†

    Chronological Chart of the Second Temple Period† Period/Date Foreign Rulers Judaean Priests / Rulers Qumran / Other Relevant Items Alexander the Great conquers the Near 300 East (334-323). Replaces Persian • Translation of the Bible into rule; strong program of Hellenization Greek (LXX) started Rule by the Ptolemies of Egypt (323- • Foundation of many Hellenistic 200) cities in Judaea (Gaza, Asdod, 200 Ashkelon, Joppa, Ptolemais, Rule by the Selucids of Syria Onias III (198-74); Zadokite High Priest; resisted Hellenistic Samaria, Scythopolis, etc.) Antiochus III the Great (198-87) influences; replaced and exiled by Antiochus IV Â Selucis IV Philopater (187-75) Antiochus IV Epiphanes (175-63); Jason/Jesus (174-71); Zadokite High Priest; Pro-Hellenist, brother • The “Devout” (Hasidim) arose in 175 brother of Selucis IV Philopater of Onais. Built a gymnasium, transformed Jerusalem into a response to Antiochus IV’s Greek polis called Antioch. Lawful institutions abolished and actions; had a policy of passive practices contrary to Law were introduced (2Macc 4:11). resistance Menelaus (171-62?); non-Zadokite, “bought” the high preisthood; • Teacher of Righteousness’s caused the murder of Onias III (170). Program of forced (TR) ministry begins in 176 (cf. ) Hellenization (1Macc 1; 2Macc 5-6). Profaned and plundered CD-A 1:3-11). Vermes argues the BCE the Temple by setting up a altar to Olympian Zeus (167) TR was a leader of Hasidim. Antiochus V Eupator (164-162). Was Judas Maccabeus (166-61). Military leader who took over the • Maccabean Revolt led by more moderate than father; allowed leadership of the revolt after the death of his father Mattathias.
  • An Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability, Risk, and Adaptation in Albania's Energy Sector

    An Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability, Risk, and Adaptation in Albania's Energy Sector

    Report No. 53331-ALB CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS An Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability, Risk, and Adaptation in Albania’s Power Sector FINAL REPORT December 2009 ESMAP MISSION The Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) is a global knowledge and technical assistance trust fund program administered by the World Bank and assists low- and middle-income countries to increase know-how and institutional capacity to achieve environmentally sustainable energy solutions for poverty reduction and economic growth. ESMAP COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) reports are published to communicate the results of ESMAP‘s work to the development community with the least possible delay. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, or its affiliated organizations, or to members of its board of executive directors for the countries they represent, or to ESMAP. The World Bank and ESMAP do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement of acceptance of such boundaries. Vice President: Philippe H Le Houerou Country Director: Jane Armitage Sector Director: Peter Thomson Sector Manager: Ranjit Lamech Task Team Leader: Jane Ebinger i TABLE OF CONTENTS SYNOPSIS vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii ACRONYMS viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ix Albania‘s Energy Sector and Climate Change ix Recommendations for Building Climate Resilience of the Energy Sector xi PËRMBLEDHJE EKZEKUTIVE xv Sektori i energjisë në Shqipëri dhe ndryshimet klimatike xv Rekomandimet për krijimin e elasticitetit klimatik të sektorit energjitik xvii 1.
  • Titus Quinctius Flamininus, the Man and His Portrayal by Plutarch

    Titus Quinctius Flamininus, the Man and His Portrayal by Plutarch

    for my father Promotor Prof. dr. Kristoffel Demoen Vakgroep Letterkunde Copromotor dr. Koen De Temmerman Vakgroep Letterkunde Decaan Prof. dr. Freddy Mortier Rector Prof. dr. Paul Van Cauwenberge Illustration on cover: gold stater bearing the image of Flamininus, now on display in the British Museum. On the reverse side: image of Nike and identification of the Roman statesman (“T. Quincti”) © Trustees of the British Museum. Alle rechten voorbehouden. Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden verveelvoudigd, opgeslagen in een geautomatiseerd gegevensbestand, of openbaar gemaakt, in enige vorm of op enige wijze, hetzij elektronisch, mechanisch, door fotokopieën, opnamen, of enige andere manier, zonder voorafgaande toestemming van de uitgever. Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Peter Newey Titus Quinctius Flamininus, the Man and his Portrayal by Plutarch Proefschrift voorgedragen tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Taal- en Letterkunde 2012 Foreword It was nearly fifty years ago as an undergraduate that, following a course of lectures on Livy XXXIII, I first met Titus Quinctius Flamininus. Fascinated by the inextricable blend of historicity and personality that emerges from Livy‖s text, I immediately directed my attention toward Polybius 18. Plutarch‖s Life of Flamininus was the next logical step. Although I was not destined to pursue an academic career, the deep impression left on me by these authors endured over the following years. Hence, finally, with the leisure and a most gratefully accepted opportunity, my thesis. My thanks are due initially to Dr T.A. Dorey, who inspired and nurtured my interest in ancient historiography during my undergraduate years in the University of Birmingham.
  • The Coinage of Apollonia and Dyrrhachium 31 3.1 Introduction 31 3.2 Brief Discussion of the Coin Types 31

    The Coinage of Apollonia and Dyrrhachium 31 3.1 Introduction 31 3.2 Brief Discussion of the Coin Types 31

    Ross, Scott (2013) An assessment and up-to-date catalogue of the coins of Apollonia and Dyrrhachium between the 5th and 1st centuries B.C. MPhil(R) thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/4335/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Scott Ross MA (Hons) 0706244 “An assessment and up-to-date catalogue of the coins of Apollonia and Dyrrhachium between the 5th and 1st centuries B.C.” Submitted for the honour of Master of Philosophy (by research) 2012 Classics, School of Humanities, University of Glasgow 1 Acknowledgments 3 Introduction 4 Chapter 1: Methodology 7 Chapter 2: The History of Illyria 12 2.1 Introduction 12 2.2 Physical geography 13 2.3 Political structure of Illyria 15 2.4 Conflict and turmoil 17 2.5 Piracy and Roman intervention 20 2.6 Conclusions 29 Chapter 3: The Coinage of Apollonia and Dyrrhachium 31 3.1 Introduction 31 3.2 Brief discussion of the coin types 31 Chapter 4: Weight standard and circulation 35 Chapter 5: Iconography of Silver Issues 41 5.1 Corcyrean Staters 41 5.2 Corinthian Staters 44 5.3 Drachms 45 5.4 Apollo Denarius 48 5.5 Conclusions 49 Chapter 6: Conclusion 50 Catalogue 52 Monograms 236 Bibliography 238 List of Images 241 2 Acknowledgements This is to say thanks to: Dr.
  • First Steps of the Roman Diplomacy in the Eastern Mediterranean: Development of the Common Political Strategy

    First Steps of the Roman Diplomacy in the Eastern Mediterranean: Development of the Common Political Strategy

    Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica 24(2): 221–239 First steps of the Roman diplomacy in the Eastern Mediterranean: development of the common political strategy Andrey V. VASILYEV1 Abstract. The article deals with the first diplomatic contacts of Rome in the Hellenistic world in 3rd century BC (before the beginning of the Second Macedonian War). The author attempts to discover if Roman Senate had common approach to its eastern policy in this period. In general the author agrees with those scholars who assert that Romans on their eastern diplomacy used the instrument (widespread in the interstate relations of the Hellenistic world) of “informal friendship” (amicitia – φιλία). However, tracing the development of the Roman relations with its “friends” in the Eastern Mediterranean, the author comes to the conclusion that from the beginning of the Illyrian Wars Roman attitude towards those states which established the amicable relations with Rome started to change. Romans more and more perceived these states as clients and expected from them services, which were usually provided by the Roman socii in Italy. The only exception from such a practice was the military alliance with Aetolia during the First Macedonian War which was determined by the extraordinary circumstances of this conflict. Rezumat. Autorul face referire la primele contacte diplomatice ale Romei cu lumea elenistică în secolul al III-lea a.Chr. (înainte de începutul celui de-al doilea război macedonean). El este în general de acord cu acei cercetători care susțin că romanii au utilizat în diplomația lor din răsărit instrumentul (altminteri răspândit în relațiile interstatale din lumea elenistică) „prieteniei informale” (amicitia – φιλία).
  • IN ITALY Visit

    IN ITALY Visit

    HCULAToR .' I{ H2 ZP .\ .l ! r{J zl . TIIE HELMETS OF PERDII<I<AS II . ON A *DIG" IN ITALY Visit www.TomCederlind.com ... SYRACUSE. c. 404-400 Be. Silver DekadJachm, unsigned dies by Kimon . .. .or call for a complimentary catalog .... TOM CEDERLIND NUMISMATICS & ANTIQUITIES PO Box 1963, Dept. C (5031228-2746 Portl and, OR 97207 Fax (5031 228-8 130 www. TomCederlind.com/info@TomCederiind .com Vol. 24, No.6 The 6 elator'" Inside The Celafof'ID ... June 2010 Consecutive Issue No. 276 Incorporating Roman Coins 'lmd Culture FEATURES PublisherlEditor Kerry K. WeUerstrom [email protected] 6 The Helmets of Perdikkas II by Randall Hixenbaugh Associate Editors On a "Dig" in Italy Robert L. Black 22 Michael R. Mehalick by Victor 'Tory" Failmezger Page 6 For Back Issues From DEPARTMENTS 19ff1 to May 1999 contact: Wayne Sayles [email protected] 2 Editor's Note Coming Next Month Art: Parnell Nelson 28 Ancient Coins for Education Essay Contest Winners 32 Art and the Market Maps & Graphic Art: ~romes: ill j}unti S"matic!) Page 22 Kenny Grady 33 Art and the Market P.O. Box 10607 Lancaster, PA 17605 36 Coming Events TeVFax:7 17~.a557 For FedEx & UPS deliveries: 38 CHTIC NEWS by Chris Rudd Kerry K. Wetterstrom 87 Apricot Ave 41 ANTIQ1IIT1 ES by David Liebert Leola, PA 17540-1788 42 QCoins of tue jBible by David Hendin www.celator.com The Celaror (ISSN #1048·0986) 44 The Internet Connection is an independent journal pub­ by Kevin Barry & Zachary "Beast" Beasley lished on the first day of each month at 87 Apricot Ave, Leola, PA 17540-1788.
  • Illyrian Policy of Rome in the Late Republic and Early Principate

    Illyrian Policy of Rome in the Late Republic and Early Principate

    ILLYRIAN POLICY OF ROME IN THE LATE REPUBLIC AND EARLY PRINCIPATE Danijel Dzino Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics University of Adelaide August 2005 II Table of Contents TITLE PAGE I TABLE OF CONTENTS II ABSTRACT V DECLARATION VI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS VII LIST OF FIGURES VIII LIST OF PLATES AND MAPS IX 1. Introduction, approaches, review of sources and secondary literature 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Rome and Illyricum (a short story) 2 1.3 Methodology 6 1.4.1 Illyrian policy of Rome in the context of world-system analysis: Policy as an interaction between systems 9 1.4.2 The Illyrian policy of Rome in the context of world-system analysis: Working hypothesis 11 1.5 The stages in the Roman Illyrian relationship (the development of a political/constitutional framework) 16 1.6 Themes and approaches: Illyricum in Roman historiography 18 1.7.1 Literature review: primary sources 21 1.7.2 Literature review: modern works 26 2. Illyricum in Roman foreign policy: historical outline, theoretical approaches and geography 2.1 Introduction 30 2.2 Roman foreign policy: Who made it, how and why was it made, and where did it stop 30 2.3 The instruments of Roman foreign policy 36 2.4 The place of Illyricum in the Mediterranean political landscape 39 2.5 The geography and ethnography of pre-Roman Illyricum 43 III 2.5.1 The Greeks and Celts in Illyricum 44 2.5.2 The Illyrian peoples 47 3. The Illyrian policy of Rome 167 – 60 BC: Illyricum - the realm of bifocality 3.1 Introduction 55 3.2 Prelude: the making of bifocality 56 3.3 The South and Central Adriatic 60 3.4 The North Adriatic 65 3.5 Republican policy in Illyricum before Caesar: the assessment 71 4.