DOCSLIB.ORG

Coastal Act Compliance Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coastal Act Compliance Report Coastal Act Compliance Report Hare Creek Center and Hare Creek Subdivision Fort Bragg, Mendocino County, California Prepared For: Group II Commercial Real Estate, Inc. 818 Grayson Road Suite 100 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Contact: Matt Richmond richmond@wra-ca.com Date: March 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 2.0 REGULATORY BACKGROUND AND ESHA DEFINITIONS ................................. 1 2.1 Wetlands ............................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Riparian Habitats ............................................................................................... 5 2.3 Streams, Rivers, and Anadromous Fish Habitats ............................................... 6 2.4 Special-status Species ....................................................................................... 6 2.5 Other ESHA ....................................................................................................... 7 3.0 METHODS ............................................................................................................ 7 3.1 Wetlands ............................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Special-status Species Surveys ......................................................................... 8 3.2.1 Special-status Plant Species ....................................................................... 8 3.2.2 Special-status Wildlife Species .................................................................... 9 3.3 Other ESHA ....................................................................................................... 9 4.0 STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION .............................................................................. 9 4.1 Land-use History ................................................................................................ 9 4.2 Topography and Soils ...................................................................................... 10 4.3 Climate and Hydrology ..................................................................................... 11 4.4 Vegetation ........................................................................................................ 11 5.0 RESULTS ............................................................................................................ 13 5.1 Wetlands .......................................................................................................... 13 5.2 Other Resource Areas and Natural Communities ............................................. 13 5.3 Special-status Species ..................................................................................... 13 5.3.1 Special-status Plant Species ..................................................................... 13 5.3.2 Special-status Wildlife Species .................................................................. 14 6.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................... 17 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Study Area Location ........................................................................................ 2 Sheet G2. Site Plan ........................................................................................................ 3 Figure 3: Vegetation Communities in the Study Area ................................................... 12 Figure 4. Special-status Plant Records within Five Miles of the Study Area ................. 15 Figure 5. Special-status Wildlife Records within Five Miles of the Study Area .............. 16 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A – Wetland Data Sheets APPENDIX B – Potential for Special-status species to occur in the Study Area APPENDIX C – Observed Species within the Study Area APPENDIX D – Representative Photographs of the Study Area i 1.0 INTRODUCTION On March 22, May 11, June 12, and July 11, 2012, WRA, Inc. performed an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) survey and assessment at the proposed Hare Creek Center development (Project) (APN 018-450-40) in Fort Bragg, in Mendocino County, California (Study Area, Figure 1). The proposed project (Sheet G2) also includes a lot line adjustment of APN 018-450-41 and a future subdivision of APN 018-450-41. The approximately 18.5-acre Study Area is located on California Highway 1 south of the Noyo River Bridge and immediately north of Hare Creek, immediately west of the intersection of California Highway 1 and California Highway 20. The purpose of this study was to identify and map areas within a the Study Area that are potential environmentally sensitive habitat areas (ESHA), as defined by the California Coastal Commission (CCC) and Fort Bragg Local Coastal Program (LCP). 2.0 REGULATORY BACKGROUND AND ESHA DEFINITIONS The California Coastal Act (CCA) and Fort Bragg LCP define an ESHA as follows: Environmentally sensitive habitat area’ means any area in which plant or animal life or their habitats are either rare or especially valuable because of their special nature or role in an ecosystem and which could be easily disturbed or degraded by human activities and developments. Additionally, the Fort Bragg LCP cites: Protection of environmentally sensitive habitat areas is one of the essential aspects of the Coastal Act. Fort Bragg has several environmentally sensitive habitat areas including, but not limited to, portions of coastal bluffs, biologically rich tide pools, nesting grounds, kelp beds, wetlands, riparian habitats, and rare, threatened, or endangered plants or plant communities. The Fort Bragg LCP and California Coastal Commission (CCC) Guidelines contain definitions for specific types of ESHAs, including: wetlands, estuaries, streams and rivers, lakes, open coastal waters and coastal waters, riparian habitats, other resource areas, and special-status species and their habitats. For the purposes of this report, WRA has taken into consideration any areas that may meet the definition of ESHA as defined by the CCA, CCC guidelines, or the Fort Bragg LCP. The Fort Bragg LCP outlines the following when determining an ESHA: Policy OS-1.2: Determination of ESHA. The determination of what constitutes ESHA shall not be limited by what is mapped and not all parcels that are mapped necessarily contain ESHA. Map OS-1 serves to identify those general areas known to potentially contain ESHA and for which a biological report is required consistent with Policy OS-1.7 to substantiate the presence or absence of ESHA on any particular parcel. Any area not designated on LUP Map OS-1 that meets the ESHA definition is ESHA and shall be accorded all the protection provided for ESHA in the LCP. All habitat maps shall include a note that states that “the maps may be updated as appropriate and may not include all areas that constitute ESHA.” The following areas shall be considered ESHA: 1 Regional Location 1 101 Fort Bragg Fort Bragg Study Area Willits Caspar 20 Mendocino Potter Valley Little River Comptche Redwood Valley Calpella Albion Mendocino County 20 Upper Lake Elk Ukiah 128 Lake Philo County Lakeport 1 Boonville Manchester Hopland Point Arena 1 Cloverdale Gualala Sonoma 101 County Geyserville er iv R yo No . e v A r Ocean o view Dr. b r a H Study Area 20 1 Figure 1. Location of Study Area 0 500 1,000 2,000 Date: September 2012 Map By: Michael Rochelle Mendocino County, California Feet Base Source: Bing Maps Path: L:\Acad 2000 Files\21000\21163\gis\arcmap\Location.mxd SITE PLAN SHEET SHEET PROJECT: TITLE: A1.0 HARE CREEK CENTER SITE PLAN OF OF GROUP II COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, INC. 1250 DEL MAR DRIVE PO Box 798 Mendocino, CA 95460 32510 Pearl Dr., Fort Bragg, CA 95437 SHEETS SHEETS FORT BRAGG, CALIFORNIA 707-937-0770 Mendocino 707-357-2288 dblennox@mcn.org / www.dblennox.com marthagarstang@yahoo.com APN.# 018-450-41 Any habitat area that is rare or especially valuable because of their special nature or role in an ecosystem and is easily degraded or disturbed by human activities or developments. Any habitat area or animal species designated as rare, threatened, or endangered under State or Federal Law. Any habitat area of species designated as Fully Protected or Species of Special Concern under State law or regulations. Any habitat area of plant species for which there is compelling evidence of rarity, for example, those designated 1b (Rare or endangered in California and elsewhere) or 2 (rare, threatened or endangered in California but more common elsewhere) by the California Native Plant Society. Specific to land division projects, the Fort Bragg LCP contains the following policy: Policy OS-1-11: Land Division and ESHA. Prohibit new land divisions creating new parcels located entirely within an environmentally sensitive habitat area or buffer area unless the parcel to be created is restricted at the time of its creation solely for open space, public recreation, or conservation. The following definitions guided the assessment of potential ESHA observed in the Study Area: 2.1 Wetlands The California Coastal Act and Fort Bragg LCP define wetlands as: Wetland means lands within the Coastal Zone which may be covered periodically or permanently with shallow water and include saltwater marshes, freshwater marshes, open or closed brackish water marshes, swamps, mudflats, and fens. Public Resources Code Section 30121 CCC Administrative Regulations (Section 13577 (b)) provide a more explicit definition: Wetlands are lands where the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RESTORATION ACTION PLAN MARINA DUNES PRESERVE Marina, California
    RESTORATION ACTION PLAN MARINA DUNES PRESERVE Marina, California Prepared for: Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District 4860 Carmel Valley Road Carmel, CA 93923 Prepared by: Burleson Consulting Inc. 1900 Garden Road, Suite 210 Monterey, CA 93940 March 2021 This page intentionally left blank Restoration Action Plan, Marina Dunes Preserve CONTENTS CONTENTS ..........................................................................................................................................i APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................................... ii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................... iii 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Approach ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2. UPDATED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES .............................................................................. 3 2.1 Weed Eradication and Control .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Muelleria Vol 32, 2014
    Muelleria 33: 85–95 Published online in advance of the print edition, 21 April 2015. Nomenclature, variation and hybridisation in Rough Blown-grass (Poaceae: Lachnagrostis) Austin J. Brown National Herbarium of Victoria, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Birdwood Avenue, South Yarra 3141, Victoria, Australia; tel: +61 3 9252 2300; e-mail: austinjamesbrown@gmail.com Introduction Abstract Variation in Rough Blown-grass (also known as Ruddy, Even or Meagre The name Lachnagrostis scabra ‘(P. Blown-grass) has been previously examined by Brown (2006) with the Beauv.) Nees ex Steud.’ for Rough Blown-grass is found to be a result that Lachnagrostis aequata (Nees) S.W.L.Jacobs (syn. Agrostis misapplication of Lachnagrostis scabra aequata Nees) and L. scabra ‘(P.Beauv.) Nees ex Steud.’ (syn. Agrostis scabra Nees ex Steud. (currently known R.Br. non Willd.) were considered to be the same taxon. In addition, it was as Agrostis pilosula Trin.): an Asiatic found that the name L. aequata had been misapplied to a Tasmanian taxon not found in Australia. The montane taxon, which was subsequently described as L. morrisii A.J.Br. correct name for Rough Blown-grass is Lachnagrostis rudis (Roem. & Schult.) Recent doubt expressed in Tropicos (2014) and APC (2014) concerning Trin. A dwarf form of the species the status of Vilfa scabra P.Beauv. as a new name or a new combination from Flinders Island is described as for A. scabra Willd. or A. scabra R.Br. respectively, has initiated a closer L. rudis subsp. nana A.J.Br., based examination of the name L. scabra Nees ex Steud.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final Report Final pre-release investigations of the gorse thrips (Sericothrips staphylinus) as a biocontrol agent for gorse (Ulex europaeus) in North America Date: August 31, 2012 Award Number: 10-CA-11420004-184 Report Period: June 1, 2010– May 31, 2012 Project Period: June 1, 2010– May 31, 2012 Recipient: Oregon State University Recipient Contact Person: Fritzi Grevstad Principal Investigator/ Project Director: Fritzi Grevstad Introduction Gorse (Ulex europaeus) is an environmental weed classified as noxious in the states of Washington, Oregon, California, and Hawaii. A classical biological control program has been applied in Hawaii with the introduction of 4 gorse-feeding arthropods, but only two of these (a mite and a seed weevil) have been introduced to the mainland U.S. The two insects that have not yet been introduced include the gorse thrips, Sericothips staphylinus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), and the moth Agonopterix umbellana (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae). With prior support from the U.S. Forest Service (joint venture agreement # 07-JV-281), we were able to complete host specificity testing of S. staphylinus on 44 North American plant species that were on the original test plant list. However, following review of the proposed Test Plant List, the Technical Advisory Group on Biocontrol of Weeds (TAG) recommended that we include an additional 18 plant species for testing. In this report, we present host specificity testing and related objectives necessary to bring the program to the implementation stage. Objectives (1) Acquire and grow the additional 18 species of plants recommended by the TAG. (2) Complete host specificity trials for the gorse thrips on the 18 plant species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Dunes
    BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF THE DEL MONTE FOREST COASTAL DUNES DEL MONTE FOREST PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN Prepared for: Pebble Beach Company Post Office Box 1767 Pebble Beach, California 93953-1767 Contact: Mark Stilwell (831) 625-8497 Prepared by: Zander Associates 150 Ford Way, Suite 101 Novato, California 94945 Contact: Michael Zander July 2001 Zander Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures and Plates 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................1 2.0 Overview of Dunes within the DMF Planning Area...................................................2 2.1 Remnant Dunes .......................................................................................................2 2.2 Rehabilitation Area..................................................................................................4 2.3 ESHA Boundary......................................................................................................6 3.0 Relationship to the DMF Plan .....................................................................................8 3.1 Preserve Areas (Area L and Signal Hill Dune) .......................................................8 3.2 Development Areas (New Golf Course and Facilities—Areas M & N).................8 3.2.1 General Design Considerations .......................................................................8 3.2.2 Golf Course Specific Design...........................................................................9 3.2.3 Golf
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Survey Report Horseshoe Pond Restoration Project Point Reyes National Seashore Marin County, California
    Botanical Survey Report Horseshoe Pond Restoration Project Point Reyes National Seashore Marin County, California Prepared By: Lorraine Parsons Point Reyes National Seashore Division of Natural Resources Management Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 May 17, 2002 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 REGULATORY BACKGROUND The purpose of this report is to provide background information regarding botanical resources within the Horseshoe Pond Restoration Project area (Proposed Project Area). Point Reyes National Seashore (Seashore) is preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Proposed Project. Background information in this report will be used to guide development and assess potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. As part of the EA, the Seashore must consider whether the Proposed Project could impact special status plant species, as well as special status wildlife species and other sensitive biological resources such as wetlands and riparian areas. Special status plant species include those that are legally protected under the federal and California Endangered Species Acts (ESA) or other regulations and species that are considered rare by the scientific community. Special status species are defined as: • plants that are listed or proposed for listing as threatened or endangered under the California ESA (Fish and Game Code §2050 et seq.; 14 CCR §670.1 et seq.) and/or the federal ESA (50 CFR 17.11 for animals; various notices in the Federal Register [FR] for proposed species); • plants that are candidates for possible future listing as threatened or endangered under the federal ESA (61 FR 7506 February 28, 1996); • plants that meet the definition of rare or endangered under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (14 CCR §15380) which includes species not found on state or federal endangered species lists; • plants that are designated as “species of concern” (former category 2 candidates for listing) by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Botanical Collections from San Damián District (Huarochirí Province, Lima Department, Peru)
    Checklist of botanical collections from San Damián district (Huarochirí province, Lima department, Peru) A list with the names of miscellaneous botanical collections made by the authors in San Damián district (Huarochirí province, Lima department), in Central Peru, is provided. Most reported species are rosids, and will be thoroughly treated later. We report more than fifty records for the general flora of the place, including asterids, rosids, grasses and lichens. The present work is a support document for the License thesis of the first author, where further explanations and insights are to be provided. PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1523v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 24 Nov 2015, publ: 24 Nov 2015 CHECKLIST OF BOTANICAL COLLECTIONS FROM SAN DAMIÁN DISTRICT (HUAROCHIRÍ PROVINCE, LIMA DEPARTMENT, PERU) Eduardo Antonio MOLINARI NOVOA “Augusto Weberbauer” Herbarium (MOL) Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina Apartado Postal 456 La Molina, Lima, Perú 20090095@lamolina.edu.pe Carlos Enrique SÁNCHEZ OCHARAN “Augusto Weberbauer” Herbarium (MOL) Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina Apartado Postal 456 La Molina, Lima, Perú 20060981@lamolina.edu.pe Tatiana Giannina ANAYA ARAUJO Academic Department of Biology Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina Apartado Postal 456 La Molina, Lima, Perú 20090083@lamolina.edu.pe Luis Fernando MAYTA ANCO Biological and Agrarian Sciences Faculty Universidad Nacional de San Agustín Alcides Carrión s/n Arequipa, Perú mundodev@hotmail.com Jessica Natalia CARPIO LAU Applied Botany Laboratory Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia Av. Honorio Delgado 430 San Martín de Porres, Lima, Perú jessica.carpio.l@upch.pe Miguel Enrique MENDOZA TINCOPA “Carlos Vidal Layseca” Faculty Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia Av.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturally Large Fires in Southern California
    December 2011 CHAPTER MEETING Tuesday, December 20; 7 p.m. Room 104, Casa del Prado Balboa Park HOLIDAY GALA Heteromeles arbutifolia (Toyon) provides winter color. Toyon is a It’s time for our Holiday Gala Extravaganza on prominent component of the coastal sage scrub and is also often found in chaparral and mixed oak woodlands. It is also known by the common Tuesday, December 20! It’s a regular chapter names Christmas berry and California holly. Some say Hollywood, meeting day, so it’s already on your calendar. California was named for this species. And it’s a potluck, so no need to RSVP. Just come and bring your choicest delicacies (or most down-home goodies) to share. The BOARD OF DIRECTORS Chapter will supply the usual tasty hot water for coffee and tea, hot mulled cider, utensils, cups, MEETING napkins, and plates. You provide the stuff to put on the plates! There will be live music and Wednesday, December 7, 6:30 - 8:30 p.m., who knows what-all! monthly CNPS San Diego Chapter board meeting to be held at 4010 Morena Blvd, Suite 100, San Diego (Thomas Guide 1248 C4). Exit I-5 to Balboa Dr. east Bring your pictures of native plants, native and turn north on Morena Drive. Proceed 1/2 mile gardens, or whatever on a disk or thumb drive and make a u-turn at the Avati Street signal and turn and CNPS will provide a computer and into the driveway for 4010. Drive to the parking lot on projector. See you at the Gala! the west side (away from Morena).
    [Show full text]
  • Genista Monspessulana – Montpellier Broom, Cape Broom, Canary Broom
    Application for WoNS candidacy Genista monspessulana – Montpellier Broom, Cape Broom, Canary Broom Contact: Ashley Millar - (08) 9334 0312; Department of Environment and Conservation (WA) October 2010 Introduction Genista monspessulana (L.) L.A.S.Johnson (Fabaceae), also known more commonly as Montpellier Broom, Cape Broom and Canary Broom, is a woody legume weed with significant current and potential impacts on forestry production, biodiversity of natural ecosystems, grazing systems, access to amenity areas and fire risk. Infestations occur in all temperate states of Australia, with particularly severe infestations in the Adelaide Hills, southern Tasmania, central and southern Great Dividing Range of NSW, central Victoria and south west WA. G. monspessulana was ranked 37th in the initial evaluation of weeds nominated for Weeds of Natural Significance (WONS) (Thorp and Lynch 2000), with a particularly high impact score due to its formation of dense, impenetrable thickets arising from a long-lived soil seed bank (source: Henry et al . 2010). Species description: G. monspessulana is an erect, perennial slender shrub which grows up to 5-6m. It has trifoliolate petiolate leaves which are more or less glabrous. This species has yellow flowers which are produced from August to January. G. monspessulana occurs in loamy soil through to lateritic and peaty sand and is commonly found along rivers and roadsides (Parsons and Cuthbertson 2001; FLORABASE DEC 2010). G. monspessulana is native to the Mediterranean region that has become established, and is considered a persistent and deleterious plant, in several other regions of the world, including the Americas, Australia and New Zealand. It is considered deleterious because of its ability to form dense almost mono-cultural stands, which replace and suppress native flora and economically valuable timber plants (Lloyd 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Angiosperm Pollen. 7. Nitrogen-Fixing Clade1
    Evolution of Angiosperm Pollen. 7. Nitrogen-Fixing Clade1 Authors: Jiang, Wei, He, Hua-Jie, Lu, Lu, Burgess, Kevin S., Wang, Hong, et. al. Source: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 104(2) : 171-229 Published By: Missouri Botanical Garden Press URL: https://doi.org/10.3417/2019337 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Annals-of-the-Missouri-Botanical-Garden on 01 Apr 2020 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Access provided by Kunming Institute of Botany, CAS Volume 104 Annals Number 2 of the R 2019 Missouri Botanical Garden EVOLUTION OF ANGIOSPERM Wei Jiang,2,3,7 Hua-Jie He,4,7 Lu Lu,2,5 POLLEN. 7. NITROGEN-FIXING Kevin S. Burgess,6 Hong Wang,2* and 2,4 CLADE1 De-Zhu Li * ABSTRACT Nitrogen-fixing symbiosis in root nodules is known in only 10 families, which are distributed among a clade of four orders and delimited as the nitrogen-fixing clade.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Plants of Bendigo
    Produced by Indigenous Plants of Bendigo Indigenous Plants of Bendigo PMS 1807 RED PMS 432 GREY PMS 142 GOLD A Gardener’s Guide to Growing and Protecting Local Plants 3rd Edition 9 © Copyright City of Greater Bendigo and Bendigo Native Plant Group Inc. This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the City of Greater Bendigo. First Published 2004 Second Edition 2007 Third Edition 2013 Printed by Bendigo Modern Press: www.bmp.com.au This book is also available on the City of Greater Bendigo website: www.bendigo.vic.gov.au Printed on 100% recycled paper. Disclaimer “The information contained in this publication is of a general nature only. This publication is not intended to provide a definitive analysis, or discussion, on each issue canvassed. While the Committee/Council believes the information contained herein is correct, it does not accept any liability whatsoever/howsoever arising from reliance on this publication. Therefore, readers should make their own enquiries, and conduct their own investigations, concerning every issue canvassed herein.” Front cover - Clockwise from centre top: Bendigo Wax-flower (Pam Sheean), Hoary Sunray (Marilyn Sprague), Red Ironbark (Pam Sheean), Green Mallee (Anthony Sheean), Whirrakee Wattle (Anthony Sheean). Table of contents Acknowledgements ...............................................2 Foreword..........................................................3 Introduction.......................................................4
    [Show full text]