DOCSLIB.ORG

Extras04-The Tautochrone

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Extras04-The Tautochrone The Tautochrone Learning Goals: students can sit back and watch the great minds of the late 17th century use the calculus they’ve been learning all year solve a very interesting problem. When we looked at the differential equation y′′ + a2y = 0 that was a simplification of the pendulum equation, we found the general solution A cos(at) + B sin(at) where A and B are constants used to set up initial conditions (displacement and speed) of the pendulum bob. Note that when we simplified the pendulum equation, we found that so that the period of a = g / l the motion depends only on the strength of gravity and the length of the pendulum cord. But real pendulums don’t work like that. The small angle approximation goes wrong by about 1% after just a few degrees of swing. If you’re trying to navigate a ship using a pendulum clock, 1% time differences become a problem really quickly! The problem is that real pendulums have a longer period for a larger swing. For larger θ, sin(θ) is less that θ, so a isn’t really constant, and gets smaller as θ gets larger, leader to a longer period. To make a more accurate clock, we need a pendulum that doesn’t swing in the arc of a circle. At a given height, the pendulum will need a steeper swing, so that it accelerates more and moves faster, accounting for the greater length of the path it has to follow. In other words, the tautochrone—a curve where objects that move along it under gravity all take the same amount of time to reach bottom—will be steeper than a circle. At right, the circular arc is a dashed line, while the pendulum with the same length cord that swings in a tautochrone is the solid curve. The first person to solve for what shape the tautochrone actually is was Christian Huygens, though he did it completely geometrically. We will do it using calculus. The trick to getting going in this problem is to think about the distance of travel along the curve. Let s be the distance along the curve, starting at the bottom and moving up to the right. The key observation is that to have a period independent of distance traveled along the curve, the motion along the curve must satisfy the simplified formula s′′ + a2s = 0 that we saw above! If this is not immediately obvious to you (and it probably shouldn’t be!) here is a very good reason why it should be true. Let there be two pendulums swinging, but start them in two different places along the curve, say at s1 and s2. Perhaps s2 is twice as far along the curve as s1. Since it has twice as far to go, it should travel twice as fast to make it to the bottom at the same time, so at any time v2(t) = 2v1(t). But to get to twice the speed, the acceleration at any point in time should be twice as much. But acceleration is d2s/dt2 = s′′. Since “twice as far” could be any multiple, we should just say that s′′ is proportional to s. (The reason we need to deal with s′′ is that it is the acceleration, and that is related to force, and we know about the forces acting on the pendulum—gravity—while we don’t know about the speed it is traveling.) So s′′ = –a2s. We have a negative because the larger s—the farther to the right—the more the acceleration should be back toward the center. And we use a2 for the constant because that’s what we did before and the a had a nice interpretation, so we’ll see what happens here. So we have s′′ = –a2s. We know the solution to this differential equation is A cos(at) + B sin(at), but that only tells us how far along the curve the pendulum is. It doesn’t tell us what curve this is. For that, we need x’s and y’s. Let’s say the pendulum as at some point on the curve. What actually is the acceleration experienced by the pendulum at this point? Let the tangent line to the tautochrone at this point make an angle of θ with the horizontal. When θ is zero, the pendulum is at the bottom of its swing, and the pull of the pendulum cord straight upward cancels out gravity pulling straight downward. So there is no acceleration on the pendulum. At other points, the pendulum cord pulls at angle θ to the vertical, while gravity still pulls straight down. So the acceleration along the curve is the component of gravity that is tangent to the curve—g sin(θ). So our first transformation changes our equation to g sin(θ) = –a2s. For our next trick, we will differentiate with respect to x. So g cos(θ) dθ/dx = –a2 ds/dx (don’t forget the chain rule on the left-hand side!). But what is ds/dx? If we change x by a little bit, how far does the pendulum actually move? 2 ds ⎛ dy ⎞ This is just arclength! = 1+ . Now dy/dx is simply the slope of the curve, which we dx ⎝⎜ dx ⎠⎟ ds 2 also know is tan(θ). So = 1+ (tan(θ )) = sec2 (θ) = sec(θ). (We can choose the positive dx square root because we will always use θ between –π/2 and π/2, otherwise the pendulum bob goes above the horizontal line where the pendulum is centered.) Substitute this inteo our equation: g cos(θ) dθ/dx = –a2 sec(θ). This is a separable differential equation! Solve it for x: –g/a2 cos2(θ) dθ = dx. This is easy to 2 integrate and we find that x = –g/(4a ) (2θ + sin(2θ) ) + Cx. How can we figure out y? Well, dy/dx = tan(θ) so dy = tan(θ) dx. So multiply both sides of the last differential equation by tan(θ) and obtain –g/a2 sin(θ)cos(θ) dθ = dy. We can easily integrate 2 this to find y = g/(4a ) cos(2θ) + Cy. Finally, we set the constants so that the curve passes through the origin when θ = 0, and obtain ⎧ g x = − 2θ + sin(2θ) ⎪ 4a2 ( ) ⎨ . These happen to be the parametric equations of a cycloid! (It is ⎪ g y = 2 (cos(2θ) −1) ⎩⎪ 4a upside-down because we have cos(2θ) – 1 and not the other way around.) Note a few more things about the final answer. The solution to the original differential equation for s is A cos(at) + B sin(at). The time required to go from the top of the curve to the bottom is then π/(2a). Since this is a tautochrone, this is the time required if we start the pendulum anywhere—it will swing less and do so slower so that it takes the same amount of time on each swing. Now the radius of the circle used to create the cycloid is g/(4a2). So in terms of the radius of the circle, the time needed to slide down the cycloid is . π r / g Now the next question is: how can you actually get a pendulum to swing in a cycloid? The answer is to build in restraining walls that restrict the cord from swinging too far, and only lets less and less of it swing causing the effective length to shorten up as the swing becomes wider. These walls are called the “evolute” of the original cycloid. The truly amazing thing about a cycloid is that its evolute…is another cycloid of exactly the same size, just shifted up and slid over! Once Huygens discovered all this, he actually built a clock using a cycloidally swinging pendulum. And…it kept time worse than a regular pendulum clock! In theory it should have worked perfectly. What went wrong? The simple answer is that there was too much friction as the cord wound along the restraining walls, causing the clock to slow down. The effect turned out to be larger than the effect of approximating sin(θ) by θ. Oh, well. Not all great ideas really work out! Bonus—a geometric proof that the evolute of a cycloid is another cycloid. The picture at right show an important fact about cycloids. If P is a point on the cycloid, then you consider the circle that is tracing out the cycloid, then the tangent to the cycloid at P intersects the very bottom point of the circle, and the normal to the cycloid at P touches the very top point of the circle. The proof is to consider velocities. As � the circle traces out the cycloid, the point doing the tracing has a velocity composed of two pieces: the velocity it would have if the circle were rolling in place, and the velocity it would have it the circle were not rolling but was just sliding along. So the tangent vector to the cycloid is composed of these two pieces. Now these two parts have equal magnitude (the edge of the circle’s linear speed is the speed with which the circle is rolling!) and are respectively parallel to the two vectors shown in the diagram—one tangent to the circle and one horizontal. If the vectors shown have equal length, then the end of the horizontal is tangent at the bottom of the circle—because they are two tangents from the same point. So since the components of the velocity vector are simply multiples of these two, this velocity vector—the tangle line at the point P—passes through the bottom of the circle.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Swinging Spring: Regular and Chaotic Motion
    References The Swinging Spring: Regular and Chaotic Motion Leah Ganis May 30th, 2013 Leah Ganis The Swinging Spring: Regular and Chaotic Motion References Outline of Talk I Introduction to Problem I The Basics: Hamiltonian, Equations of Motion, Fixed Points, Stability I Linear Modes I The Progressing Ellipse and Other Regular Motions I Chaotic Motion I References Leah Ganis The Swinging Spring: Regular and Chaotic Motion References Introduction The swinging spring, or elastic pendulum, is a simple mechanical system in which many different types of motion can occur. The system is comprised of a heavy mass, attached to an essentially massless spring which does not deform. The system moves under the force of gravity and in accordance with Hooke's Law. z y r φ x k m Leah Ganis The Swinging Spring: Regular and Chaotic Motion References The Basics We can write down the equations of motion by finding the Lagrangian of the system and using the Euler-Lagrange equations. The Lagrangian, L is given by L = T − V where T is the kinetic energy of the system and V is the potential energy. Leah Ganis The Swinging Spring: Regular and Chaotic Motion References The Basics In Cartesian coordinates, the kinetic energy is given by the following: 1 T = m(_x2 +y _ 2 +z _2) 2 and the potential is given by the sum of gravitational potential and the spring potential: 1 V = mgz + k(r − l )2 2 0 where m is the mass, g is the gravitational constant, k the spring constant, r the stretched length of the spring (px2 + y 2 + z2), and l0 the unstretched length of the spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Curves – I
    Engineering Curves – I 1. Classification 2. Conic sections - explanation 3. Common Definition 4. Ellipse – ( six methods of construction) 5. Parabola – ( Three methods of construction) 6. Hyperbola – ( Three methods of construction ) 7. Methods of drawing Tangents & Normals ( four cases) Engineering Curves – II 1. Classification 2. Definitions 3. Involutes - (five cases) 4. Cycloid 5. Trochoids – (Superior and Inferior) 6. Epic cycloid and Hypo - cycloid 7. Spiral (Two cases) 8. Helix – on cylinder & on cone 9. Methods of drawing Tangents and Normals (Three cases) ENGINEERING CURVES Part- I {Conic Sections} ELLIPSE PARABOLA HYPERBOLA 1.Concentric Circle Method 1.Rectangle Method 1.Rectangular Hyperbola (coordinates given) 2.Rectangle Method 2 Method of Tangents ( Triangle Method) 2 Rectangular Hyperbola 3.Oblong Method (P-V diagram - Equation given) 3.Basic Locus Method 4.Arcs of Circle Method (Directrix – focus) 3.Basic Locus Method (Directrix – focus) 5.Rhombus Metho 6.Basic Locus Method Methods of Drawing (Directrix – focus) Tangents & Normals To These Curves. CONIC SECTIONS ELLIPSE, PARABOLA AND HYPERBOLA ARE CALLED CONIC SECTIONS BECAUSE THESE CURVES APPEAR ON THE SURFACE OF A CONE WHEN IT IS CUT BY SOME TYPICAL CUTTING PLANES. OBSERVE ILLUSTRATIONS GIVEN BELOW.. Ellipse Section Plane Section Plane Hyperbola Through Generators Parallel to Axis. Section Plane Parallel to end generator. COMMON DEFINATION OF ELLIPSE, PARABOLA & HYPERBOLA: These are the loci of points moving in a plane such that the ratio of it’s distances from a fixed point And a fixed line always remains constant. The Ratio is called ECCENTRICITY. (E) A) For Ellipse E<1 B) For Parabola E=1 C) For Hyperbola E>1 Refer Problem nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of the Elastic Pendulum Qisong Xiao; Shenghao Xia ; Corey Zammit; Nirantha Balagopal; Zijun Li Agenda
    Dynamics of the Elastic Pendulum Qisong Xiao; Shenghao Xia ; Corey Zammit; Nirantha Balagopal; Zijun Li Agenda • Introduction to the elastic pendulum problem • Derivations of the equations of motion • Real-life examples of an elastic pendulum • Trivial cases & equilibrium states • MATLAB models The Elastic Problem (Simple Harmonic Motion) 푑2푥 푑2푥 푘 • 퐹 = 푚 = −푘푥 = − 푥 푛푒푡 푑푡2 푑푡2 푚 • Solve this differential equation to find 푥 푡 = 푐1 cos 휔푡 + 푐2 sin 휔푡 = 퐴푐표푠(휔푡 − 휑) • With velocity and acceleration 푣 푡 = −퐴휔 sin 휔푡 + 휑 푎 푡 = −퐴휔2cos(휔푡 + 휑) • Total energy of the system 퐸 = 퐾 푡 + 푈 푡 1 1 1 = 푚푣푡2 + 푘푥2 = 푘퐴2 2 2 2 The Pendulum Problem (with some assumptions) • With position vector of point mass 푥 = 푙 푠푖푛휃푖 − 푐표푠휃푗 , define 푟 such that 푥 = 푙푟 and 휃 = 푐표푠휃푖 + 푠푖푛휃푗 • Find the first and second derivatives of the position vector: 푑푥 푑휃 = 푙 휃 푑푡 푑푡 2 푑2푥 푑2휃 푑휃 = 푙 휃 − 푙 푟 푑푡2 푑푡2 푑푡 • From Newton’s Law, (neglecting frictional force) 푑2푥 푚 = 퐹 + 퐹 푑푡2 푔 푡 The Pendulum Problem (with some assumptions) Defining force of gravity as 퐹푔 = −푚푔푗 = 푚푔푐표푠휃푟 − 푚푔푠푖푛휃휃 and tension of the string as 퐹푡 = −푇푟 : 2 푑휃 −푚푙 = 푚푔푐표푠휃 − 푇 푑푡 푑2휃 푚푙 = −푚푔푠푖푛휃 푑푡2 Define 휔0 = 푔/푙 to find the solution: 푑2휃 푔 = − 푠푖푛휃 = −휔2푠푖푛휃 푑푡2 푙 0 Derivation of Equations of Motion • m = pendulum mass • mspring = spring mass • l = unstreatched spring length • k = spring constant • g = acceleration due to gravity • Ft = pre-tension of spring 푚푔−퐹 • r = static spring stretch, 푟 = 푡 s 푠 푘 • rd = dynamic spring stretch • r = total spring stretch 푟푠 + 푟푑 Derivation of Equations of Motion
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneers in Optics: Christiaan Huygens
    Downloaded from Microscopy Pioneers https://www.cambridge.org/core Pioneers in Optics: Christiaan Huygens Eric Clark From the website Molecular Expressions created by the late Michael Davidson and now maintained by Eric Clark, National Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306 . IP address: [email protected] 170.106.33.22 Christiaan Huygens reliability and accuracy. The first watch using this principle (1629–1695) was finished in 1675, whereupon it was promptly presented , on Christiaan Huygens was a to his sponsor, King Louis XIV. 29 Sep 2021 at 16:11:10 brilliant Dutch mathematician, In 1681, Huygens returned to Holland where he began physicist, and astronomer who lived to construct optical lenses with extremely large focal lengths, during the seventeenth century, a which were eventually presented to the Royal Society of period sometimes referred to as the London, where they remain today. Continuing along this line Scientific Revolution. Huygens, a of work, Huygens perfected his skills in lens grinding and highly gifted theoretical and experi- subsequently invented the achromatic eyepiece that bears his , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at mental scientist, is best known name and is still in widespread use today. for his work on the theories of Huygens left Holland in 1689, and ventured to London centrifugal force, the wave theory of where he became acquainted with Sir Isaac Newton and began light, and the pendulum clock. to study Newton’s theories on classical physics. Although it At an early age, Huygens began seems Huygens was duly impressed with Newton’s work, he work in advanced mathematics was still very skeptical about any theory that did not explain by attempting to disprove several theories established by gravitation by mechanical means.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Geometry
    Differential Geometry J.B. Cooper 1995 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 CURVES AND SURFACES—INFORMAL DISCUSSION 2 1.1 Surfaces ................................ 13 2 CURVES IN THE PLANE 16 3 CURVES IN SPACE 29 4 CONSTRUCTION OF CURVES 35 5 SURFACES IN SPACE 41 6 DIFFERENTIABLEMANIFOLDS 59 6.1 Riemannmanifolds .......................... 69 1 1 CURVES AND SURFACES—INFORMAL DISCUSSION We begin with an informal discussion of curves and surfaces, concentrating on methods of describing them. We shall illustrate these with examples of classical curves and surfaces which, we hope, will give more content to the material of the following chapters. In these, we will bring a more rigorous approach. Curves in R2 are usually specified in one of two ways, the direct or parametric representation and the implicit representation. For example, straight lines have a direct representation as tx + (1 t)y : t R { − ∈ } i.e. as the range of the function φ : t tx + (1 t)y → − (here x and y are distinct points on the line) and an implicit representation: (ξ ,ξ ): aξ + bξ + c =0 { 1 2 1 2 } (where a2 + b2 = 0) as the zero set of the function f(ξ ,ξ )= aξ + bξ c. 1 2 1 2 − Similarly, the unit circle has a direct representation (cos t, sin t): t [0, 2π[ { ∈ } as the range of the function t (cos t, sin t) and an implicit representation x : 2 2 → 2 2 { ξ1 + ξ2 =1 as the set of zeros of the function f(x)= ξ1 + ξ2 1. We see from} these examples that the direct representation− displays the curve as the image of a suitable function from R (or a subset thereof, usually an in- terval) into two dimensional space, R2.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolute-Involute Partner Curves According to Darboux Frame in the Euclidean 3-Space E3
    Fundamentals of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences (2020) 1(2) 63 { 70 Evolute-Involute Partner Curves According to Darboux Frame in the Euclidean 3-space E3 Abdullah Yıldırım 1,∗ Feryat Kaya 2 1 Harran University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Mathematics S¸anlıurfa, T¨urkiye 2 S¸ehit Abdulkadir O˘guzAnatolian Imam Hatip High School S¸anlıurfa, T¨urkiye, [email protected] Received: 29 February 2020 Accepted: 29 June 2020 Abstract: In this study, evolute-involute curves are researched. Characterization of evolute-involute curves lying on the surface are examined according to Darboux frame and some curves are obtained. Keywords: Curve, surface, geodesic, curvature, frame. 1. Introduction The interest of special curves has increased recently. Some of these are associated curves. They are curves where one of the Frenet vectors at opposite points is linearly dependent to the other curve. One of the best examples of these curves is the evolute-involute partner curves. An involute thought known to have been used in his optical work came up in 1658 by C. Huygens. C. Huygens discovered involute curves while trying to make more accurate measurement studies [5]. Many researches have been conducted about evolute-involute partner curves. Some of them conducted recently are Bilici and C¸alı¸skan [4], Ozyılmaz¨ and Yılmaz [9], As and Sarıo˘glugil[2]. Bekta¸sand Y¨uceconsider the notion of the involute-evolute curves lying on the surfaces for a special situation. They determine the special involute-evolute partner D−curves in E3: By using the Darboux frame of the curves they obtain the necessary and sufficient conditions between κg , ∗ − ∗ ∗ τg; κn and κn for a curve to be the special involute partner D curve.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phenomenology of Galileo's Experiments with Pendulums
    BJHS, Page 1 of 35. f British Society for the History of Science 2009 doi:10.1017/S0007087409990033 A phenomenology of Galileo’s experiments with pendulums PAOLO PALMIERI* Abstract. The paper reports new findings about Galileo’s experiments with pendulums and discusses their significance in the context of Galileo’s writings. The methodology is based on a phenomenological approach to Galileo’s experiments, supported by computer modelling and close analysis of extant textual evidence. This methodology has allowed the author to shed light on some puzzles that Galileo’s experiments have created for scholars. The pendulum was crucial throughout Galileo’s career. Its properties, with which he was fascinated from very early in his career, especially concern time. A 1602 letter is the earliest surviving document in which Galileo discusses the hypothesis of pendulum isochronism.1 In this letter Galileo claims that all pendulums are isochronous, and that he has long been trying to demonstrate isochronism mechanically, but that so far he has been unable to succeed. From 1602 onwards Galileo referred to pendulum isochronism as an admirable property but failed to demonstrate it. The pendulum is the most open-ended of Galileo’s artefacts. After working on my reconstructed pendulums for some time, I became convinced that the pendulum had the potential to allow Galileo to break new ground. But I also realized that its elusive nature sometimes threatened to undermine the progress Galileo was making on other fronts. It is this ambivalent nature that, I thought, might prove invaluable in trying to understand crucial aspects of Galileo’s innovative methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarlette Et Al
    COMPARISON OF THE HUYGENS MISSION AND THE SM2 TEST FLIGHT FOR HUYGENS ATTITUDE RECONSTRUCTION(*) A. Sarlette(1), M. Pérez-Ayúcar, O. Witasse, J.-P. Lebreton Planetary Missions Division, Research and Scientific Support Department, ESTEC-ESA, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (1) Stagiaire from February 1 to April 29; student at Liège University, Belgium. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT 1. The SM2 probe characteristics The Huygens probe is the ESA’s main contribution to In agreement with its main purpose – performing a the Cassini/Huygens mission, carried out jointly by full system check of the Huygens descent sequence – NASA, ESA and ASI. It was designed to descend into the SM2 probe was a full scale model of the Huygens the atmosphere of Titan on January 14, 2005, probe, having the same inner and outer structure providing surface images and scientific data to study (except that the deploying booms of the HASI the ground and the atmosphere of Saturn’s largest instrument were not mounted on SM2), the same mass moon. and a similar balance. A complete description of the Huygens flight model system can be found in [1]. In the framework of the reconstruction of the probe’s motions during the descent based on the engineering All Descent Control SubSystem items (parachute data, additional information was needed to investigate system, mechanisms, pyro and command devices) were the attitude and an anomaly in the spin direction. provided according to expected flight standard; as the test flight was successful, only few differences actually Two years before the launch of the Cassini/Huygens exist at this level with respect to the Huygens probe.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer-Aided Design and Kinematic Simulation of Huygens's
    applied sciences Article Computer-Aided Design and Kinematic Simulation of Huygens’s Pendulum Clock Gloria Del Río-Cidoncha 1, José Ignacio Rojas-Sola 2,* and Francisco Javier González-Cabanes 3 1 Department of Engineering Graphics, University of Seville, 41092 Seville, Spain; [email protected] 2 Department of Engineering Graphics, Design, and Projects, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaen, Spain 3 University of Seville, 41092 Seville, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-953-212452 Received: 25 November 2019; Accepted: 9 January 2020; Published: 10 January 2020 Abstract: This article presents both the three-dimensional modelling of the isochronous pendulum clock and the simulation of its movement, as designed by the Dutch physicist, mathematician, and astronomer Christiaan Huygens, and published in 1673. This invention was chosen for this research not only due to the major technological advance that it represented as the first reliable meter of time, but also for its historical interest, since this timepiece embodied the theory of pendular movement enunciated by Huygens, which remains in force today. This 3D modelling is based on the information provided in the only plan of assembly found as an illustration in the book Horologium Oscillatorium, whereby each of its pieces has been sized and modelled, its final assembly has been carried out, and its operation has been correctly verified by means of CATIA V5 software. Likewise, the kinematic simulation of the pendulum has been carried out, following the approximation of the string by a simple chain of seven links as a composite pendulum. The results have demonstrated the exactitude of the clock.
    [Show full text]
  • SETTING up and MOVING a PENDULUM CLOCK by Brian Loomes, UK
    SETTING UP AND MOVING A PENDULUM CLOCK by Brian Loomes, UK oving a pendulum This problem may face clock with anchor the novice in two different Mescapement can ways. Firstly as a clock be difficult unless you have that runs well in its present a little guidance. Of all position but that you need these the longcase clock to move. Or as a clock is trickiest because the that is new to you and that long pendulum calls for you need to assemble greater care at setting it in and set going for the very balance, usually known as first time—such as one you have just inherited or bought at auction. If it is the first of these then you can attempt to ignore my notes about levelling. But floors in different rooms or different houses seldom agree Figure 1. When moving an on levels, and you may eight-day longcase clock you eventually have to follow need to hold the weight lines through the whole process in place by taping round the of setting the clock level accessible part of the barrel. In and in beat. a complicated musical clock, Sometimes you can such as this by Thomas Lister of persuade a clock to run by Halifax, it is vital. having it at a silly angle, or by pushing old pennies or wooden wedges under the seatboard. But this is hardly ideal and next time you move the clock you start with the same performance all over again. setting it ‘in beat’. These My suggestion is that you notes deal principally with bite the bullet right away longcase clocks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cycloid: Tangents, Velocity Vector, Area, and Arc Length
    The Cycloid: Tangents, Velocity Vector, Area, and Arc Length [This is Chapter 2, section 13 of Historical Perspectives for the Reform of Mathematics Curriculum: Geometric Curve Drawing Devices and their Role in the Transition to an Algebraic Description of Functions; http://www.quadrivium.info/mathhistory/CurveDrawingDevices.pdf Interactive applets for the figures can also be found at Mathematical Intentions.] The circle is the curve with which we all have the most experience. It is an ancient symbol and a cultural icon in most human societies. It is also the one curve whose area, tangents, and arclengths are discussed in our mathematics curriculum without the use of calculus, and indeed long before students approach calculus. This discussion can take place, because most people have a lot of experience with circles, and know several ways to generate them. Pascal thought that, second only to the circle, the curve that he saw most in daily life was the cycloid (Bishop, 1936). Perhaps the large and slowly moving carriage wheels of the seventeenth century were more easily observed than those of our modern automobile, but the cycloid is still a curve that is readily generated and one in which many students of all ages easily take an interest. In a variety of settings, when I have mentioned, for example, the path of an ant riding on the side of a bicycle tire, some immediate interest has been sparked (see Figure 2.13a). Figure 2.13a The cycloid played an important role in the thinking of the seventeenth century. It was used in architecture and engineering (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pope's Rhinoceros and Quantum Mechanics
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU Honors Projects Honors College Spring 4-30-2018 The Pope's Rhinoceros and Quantum Mechanics Michael Gulas [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Mathematics Commons, Ordinary Differential Equations and Applied Dynamics Commons, Other Applied Mathematics Commons, Partial Differential Equations Commons, and the Physics Commons Repository Citation Gulas, Michael, "The Pope's Rhinoceros and Quantum Mechanics" (2018). Honors Projects. 343. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/343 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. The Pope’s Rhinoceros and Quantum Mechanics Michael Gulas Honors Project Submitted to the Honors College at Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with University Honors May 2018 Dr. Steven Seubert Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, Advisor Dr. Marco Nardone Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Advisor Contents 1 Abstract 5 2 Classical Mechanics7 2.1 Brachistochrone....................................... 7 2.2 Laplace Transforms..................................... 10 2.2.1 Convolution..................................... 14 2.2.2 Laplace Transform Table.............................. 15 2.2.3 Inverse Laplace Transforms ............................ 15 2.3 Solving Differential Equations Using Laplace
    [Show full text]