List of Abbreviations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

List of Abbreviations List of Abbreviations (for Bibliographical Notes, and Notes and References) B.M. British Museum C.C.E. Committee of the Council on Education Ec.H.R. Economic Hi5tory Review E.H.R. Engli5h Hi5torical Review HJ. Hi5torical Journal L.G.B. Local Government Board P.L.B. Poor Law Board P.L.C. Poor Law Commission P.P. Parliamentary Paper; P.R.O. Public Record Office R.C. Royal Commission S.C. Select Committee (Unless otherwise stated, the place of publication in the ensuing lists is Lon­ don.) Bibliographical Notes 1. SETTLEMENT, REMOVAL AND THE NEW POOR LAW 1 Contemporary Material A large amount of printed material on settlement and removal, much of it highly critical of the system, exists for the nineteenth century. Here we can only llldicate the main areas where this is located. A useful llltroduction to the complex state of settlement law can be found in J. R. McCulloch, Statistical Account of the British Empire, 4th edn (1854) vol. II, pp. 652-3. Sir George Nicholls, History of the English Poor Law, '101. I II by T. Mackay (reissued, Ig04), ch. x v I offers a fuller but equally clear exposition of the state of the law and the problems involved in its reform, as does P. F. Aschrott, The English Poor Law System, Past and Present, 2nd edn (lg02) part II, ch. 1, sec. I I I. Details of the various statutes affecting settlement and removal, and of some of the more important legal cases involving settlement, can be found in the numerous legal textbooks on settlement published to help parish and union officials and others involved in settlement litigation fina their way through the tangle of statute and case law on the subject. r. F. Archbold, The Poor Law Comprising the Whole of the Law of Settlement and All the Authorities, 15th edn (18g8) which went through ten editions between 1850 and 18g8, J. F. Symonds, The Law of Settlement and Removal, 4th edn (lg03) and Herbert Davey, The Law of Settlement (lg08) are good examples of this, whilst E. Lidbetter, Settlement and Removal (1932) shows that, even after the disappearance of the unions and the boards of guardians, a knowledge of the law of settlement was considered essential for aspiring candidates in local government service. George Coode, Report to the Poor Law Board on the Law of Settlement and Removal of the Poor (1851), and Robert Pashley, Pauperism and Poor Laws (1852), constitute the two most comprehensive critiques of the law of settlement as it existed at mid-century. The Wellesley Index to Victorian Periodicals 1824-1900, vol. I ( Ig66) vol. I I (lg 7 2) provides a useful aid to tracking down some of the numerous articles on settfement and removal which appeared in nineteenth­ century periodicals. Sir Edmund Head's article of 1848 in the Edinburgh Review has recently been reprinted in A. W. Coats (ed.), Poverty in the Victorian Age, vol. II (lg73). Discussions of settlement and removal also figure prominently in the voluminous pamphlet literature on the Poor Law. An indispensable source of information and opinion is of course the great mass of evidence collected by the many nineteenth-century parliamentary select committees on settlement and removal, particularly those of 1847 (P.P., 1847, XI); 1854 (P.P., 1854, XVII); 1857-60 (P.P., 1857-8, XIII); (P.P., 1859 [sess. 21 VII); 1860 (P.P., 1860, XVII) and 1878 (P.P., 1878-g, XII), together with the evidence on, and discussion of, the problem of settlement in the reports and appendices of the Royal Commissions of 1832-4 and Ig05-09· 196 NEW POOR LAW IN THE N I NET E E NTH C E N T U R Y 2 Recent Works In contrast to the spate of nineteenth-century writing on settlement and removal, the question has been relatively neglected by modern social historians, particularly with regard to developments after the 1834 Act. Inevitably S. and B. Webb, English Local Government, English Poor Law History, Part II, The Last Hundred Years, vol. I (1929; reprinted, 1963) provides the basic account of the reforms of the law of settlement and their effects after 1834. Arthur Redford's pioneering Labour Migration in England 1800-1850 (1926; 2nd edn with introauction by W. H. Chaloner, 1963) contains a valuable dis­ cussion of the operation of the law of settlement and its effect on labour mobility. More recently, historical geographers and economic historians have begun to show a renewed interest in Poor Law settlement and removal as it affected the pattern of settlement and population distribution in rural areas. Dennis R. Mills, 'The Poor Laws and the Distribution of Population, c. 1600-1860, with Special Reference to Lincolnshire', Transactions oj the Institute of British Geographers, XXVI (1959) pp. 185-g5, marks the beginnings of this type of study, and chapter 8 of his English Rural Communities: The Impact of a Specialised Economy (1973) continues the analysis with reference to Not­ tinghamshire. Another article by the same author, 'Francis Howell's Report on the Operation of the Laws of Settlement in Nottinghamshire, 1848', Tran­ sactions oj the Thoroton Society, LXXVI (1972) pp. 46-52, examines the report of one of the Poor Law Board's inspectors on the effects of settlement and removal in his area. B. A. Holderness, '''Open'' and "Close" Parishes in England in the 18th and 19th Centuries', Agricultural History Review, xx (197l/) pp. 1l/6-39 contains a valuable discussion of the number, distribution and effect of 'close' parishes in rural areas. Dennis R. Mills, 'Spatial Implications of the Settlement Laws in Rural England' in Poverty and Social Policy, 1750-1870, Open Universiry Arts Fourth Level Course, Great Britain 1750-1950: Sources and Historiography Block IV Units 1l/-16 (1974) provides an excellent brief summary of the changes in the law of settlement between 1834 and 1865, and also makes suggestions as to the possible design of further local research into questions of settlement, 'close' and 'open' parishes and population distribution in rural areas, which may go some way towards remedYing the relative neglect of nineteenth-century settlement and removal by historians. 2. MEDICAL SERvICES UNDER THE NEW POOR LAW Surprisingly, in view of its comparative neglect by social historians, the Poor Law medical service is one of the most fully documented aspects of nineteenth -century social administration. The Annual Reports of the Poor Law Commission from 1834 to 1846, those of the Board from 1847 to 1870, and of the Local Government Board from 1871 on provide, in addition to the texts of the relevant Orders, some basic statistics and commentary on the evolution of the service from its initiation in 1834. All these reports were printed in the normal sessional series of Parliamentary Papers. To supple­ ment this regular series there were also, from time to time, periodic enqUiries into the operation of medical relief and the state of the workhouse infir­ maries. The most useful of these were the Report of the Select Committee on the Poor Law Amendment Act, P.P. XVIII (1837-8); the Report of the Select Committee on Medical Poor Relief, IX (1844); the Report of the Select Committee on Medical BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTES 197 Relief, x I I (1854); the Report of the Select Committee on the Administration of Relief to the Poor, IX (1864), and Report of Dr Edward Smith . .. on the Metropolitan Workhouse Infirmaries and Sick wards, P.P., LXI (1866). The Reports of the Royal Sanitary Commission, PP., XXXII (1868-9) and xxxv (1871), contain some valuable evidence about the public-health activities (or inactivity) of the guardians. The unprinted records of the central authorities - the Commission and the later Boards - embracing a vast mass of correspondence on matters relating to medical relief with boards of guardians, assistant commissioners and in­ spectors, are all preserved in the Ministry of Health series in the Public Record Office in London. At local level there is a wealth of archival material in the records of individual boards of guardians, most of it preserved and available for historians in County and City Record Offices. These extensive manuscript sources have as yet been little exploited by historians apart from a number of unpublished theses for higher degrees. Outside the official sphere the history of the Poor Law medical service is also well served by the publications of institutions and professional associations with a close interest in the medical aspects of poor relief. The issues of the medical journals, particularly the Lancet from 1834 and the British Medical Journal from 1856, frequently contain material of direct relevance, much of it critical, while the specia1 report of the Lancet's 'Com­ mission' of 1865 - Report of the Lancet Sanitary Commission for Investigating the State of the Infirmaries of Workhouses (1866) - has been explicitly referred to above. After its formation in 1857, the National Association for the Promo­ tion of Social Science published many papers on this subject in the Trans­ actions in which its annual conferences were reported. Much information may also be found in the considerable pamflhlet literature which was a J?rincipal vehicle for the campaign for reform of the Poor Law medical servICe. This literature is nowhere comprehensively sur­ veyed, and it is probably most fully exploited - as are so many other areas of Poor Law pamphleteering - in the footnotes of the Webbs' Poor Law History: The periodical reviews - particularly the Fortnightly, Macmillan's and Fraser's­ occasionally gave space to propaganda for reform of the medical service. At the most personal and intimate level, the memoirs of medical men and workhouse visitors provide some of the most revealing glimpses of the reality of the Poor Law medical service.
Recommended publications
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF LAW, ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES School of Social Sciences Poor Law Reform and Policy Innovation in Rural Southern England, c.1780-1850 by Samantha Anne Shave Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2010 i UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF LAW, ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Doctor of Philosophy POOR LAW REFORM AND POLICY INNOVATION IN RURAL SOUTHERN ENGLAND, c.1780-1850 by Samantha Anne Shave Recent analysis in poor law history has uncovered the experiences of individual relief claimants and recipients, emphasising their role in the welfare process. The literature has, however, tended to draw a false dichotomy between understanding the experiences of the individual poor and understanding the administration of the poor laws. This thesis deploys a ‘policy process’ understanding of social policies, a concept developed in the social sciences, to understand the processes driving social policies under the poor laws.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poor in England Steven King Is Reader in History at Contribution to the Historiography of Poverty, Combining As It Oxford Brookes University
    king&t jkt 6/2/03 2:57 PM Page 1 Alannah Tomkins is Lecturer in History at ‘Each chapter is fluently written and deeply immersed in the University of Keele. primary sources. The work as a whole makes an original The poor in England Steven King is Reader in History at contribution to the historiography of poverty, combining as it Oxford Brookes University. does a high degree of scholarship with intellectual innovation.’ The poor Professor Anne Borsay, University of Wales, Swansea This fascinating collection of studies investigates English poverty in England between 1700 and 1850 and the ways in which the poor made ends meet. The phrase ‘economy of makeshifts’ has often been used to summarise the patchy, disparate and sometimes failing 1700–1850 strategies of the poor for material survival. Incomes or benefits derived through the ‘economy’ ranged from wages supported by under-employment via petty crime through to charity; however, An economy of makeshifts until now, discussions of this array of makeshifts usually fall short of answering vital questions about how and when the poor secured access to them. This book represents the single most significant attempt in print to supply the English ‘economy of makeshifts’ with a solid, empirical basis and to advance the concept of makeshifts from a vague but convenient label to a more precise yet inclusive definition. 1700–1850 Individual chapters written by some of the leading, emerging historians of welfare examine how advantages gained from access to common land, mobilisation of kinship support, crime, and other marginal resources could prop up struggling households.
    [Show full text]
  • EH.Net Encyclopedia English Poor Laws
    EH.Net Encyclopedia: English Poor Laws http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/boyer.poor.laws.england English Poor Laws George Boyer, Cornell University A compulsory system of poor relief was instituted in England during the reign of Elizabeth I. Although the role played by poor relief was significantly modified by the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834, the Crusade Against Outrelief of the 1870s, and the adoption of various social insurance programs in the early twentieth century, the Poor Law continued to assist the poor until it was replaced by the welfare state in 1948. For nearly three centuries, the Poor Law constituted "a welfare state in miniature," relieving the elderly, widows, children, the sick, the disabled, and the unemployed and underemployed (Blaug 1964). This essay will outline the changing role played by the Poor Law, focusing on the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The Origins of the Poor Law While legislation dealing with vagrants and beggars dates back to the fourteenth century, perhaps the first English poor law legislation was enacted in 1536, instructing each parish to undertake voluntary weekly collections to assist the "impotent" poor. The parish had been the basic unit of local government since at least the fourteenth century, although Parliament imposed few if any civic functions on parishes before the sixteenth century. Parliament adopted several other statutes relating to the poor in the next sixty years, culminating with the Acts of 1597-98 and 1601 (43 Eliz. I c. 2), which established a compulsory system of poor relief that was administered and financed at the parish (local) level.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright (C) 1996 Akron Law Review
    Copyright (c) 1996 Akron Law Review Akron Law Review Fall, 1996 30 Akron L. Rev. 73 LENGTH: 33551 words ARTICLE: FIVE HUNDRED YEARS OF ENGLISH POOR LAWS, 1349-1834: REGULATING THE WORKING AND NONWORKING POOR by WILLIAM P. QUIGLEY * * Associate Professor and Director of the Gillis Long Poverty Law Center, Loyola University School of Law. SUMMARY: ... Like other and more famous English institutions, the making and administration of the English Poor Law was a growth, not a creation. ... This article will review how the working and the nonworking poor were regulated by 500 years of English poor laws. ... The only exception for the employers was the hiring of someone else's servant, which had a penalty of imprisonment. ... Finally, the law made it a crime, punishable by fine, to give money or lodging to any strong or able-bodied beggar. ... It assumed the central legal position for laborers that the 1601 Poor Law assumed for the nonworking poor. ... The history of the search for a consistent source of funding is best set out in the following by Sir George Nicholls: ... Manufacturing and commercial interests "who wanted to slash, if not terminate, public assistance in order to force poor displaced agricultural workers into the newly forming industrial wage earning class" gained power through the electoral reforms of 1832 and spurred parliament to create a Royal Poor Law Commission for Inquiring into the Administration and Practical Operation of the Poor Laws. ... This principle supported the reintroduction of the workhouse and other penal approaches to poor relief. ... As a consequence, the status quo, economic and societal, need not be disturbed in legislating regulations for working and nonworking poor people.
    [Show full text]
  • Paternalism, the Magistracy and Poor Relief in England, 1795–1834
    PETER DUNKLEY PATERNALISM, THE MAGISTRACY AND POOR RELIEF IN ENGLAND, 1795-1834 i When men in the early nineteenth century appealed to the landed pro- prietors of England to accept their "paternal responsibilities", they gave voice to the conviction that gentry behavior had special relevance for the question of social discipline.1 Conservatives, especially, adhered to the view that subordination and the hierarchy of ranks resting upon it con- stituted the fountainhead of social cohesion.2 But at the same time, reliance on this concept of social organization involved the governors in various commitments to their subordinates, for ultimately the cohesiveness of the social order seemed dependent upon the operation of reciprocal obligations.3 The place of these imperatives in rural relationships arose from, and contributed to, a tradition that saw the subsistence and well- being of the entire community to be dependent upon the social respon- sibilities of and the connections between the different degrees of interest within the agricultural economy.4 A characteristic anxiety of the conser- vative of the period was that the economic individualism of a rising urban and industrial society promised to undermine the social accountability of each component of the social order; this presaged the disintegration of society because the "chain of connexion" between the rich and the poor would thereby be broken.5 The implication was that the intrusion of self- 1 See, e.g., Thomas Carlyle, Past and Present (London, 1962; first ed. 1843), pp. 171-72; Robert Southey, "On the Means of Improving the People" (1818), in Essays, Moral and Political (Shannon, 1971), II, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nineteenth Century British Workhouse: Mission Not Accomplished
    Dominican Scholar Senior Theses Student Scholarship 12-2019 The Nineteenth Century British Workhouse: Mission Not Accomplished Brenda Derin Dominican University of California https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2019.HCS.ST.02 Survey: Let us know how this paper benefits you. Recommended Citation Derin, Brenda, "The Nineteenth Century British Workhouse: Mission Not Accomplished" (2019). Senior Theses. 116. https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2019.HCS.ST.02 This Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Dominican Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Dominican Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NINETEENTH CENTURY BRITISH WORKHOUSE: MISSION NOT ACCOMPLISHED A culminating thesis submitted to the faculty of Dominican University of California in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Bachelor of Arts in Humanities and Cultural Studies. By Brenda Derin San Rafael, CA May, 2019 Readers: Patricia Dougherty, OP, PhD Professor Emerita of History Chase Clow, PhD Chair, Humanities Division ii This thesis, written under the direction of the candidate’s thesis advisor and approved by the Chair of the undergraduate program, has been presented to and accepted by the (Faculty of the Department of Humanities and Cultural Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts?) The content and research methodologies presented in this work represent the work of the candidate alone. ___________________________________ ____________________ Brenda Derin, Candidate Date _____________________________ _________________ Dr. Chase Clow, Chair Date _______________________________ _________________ Patricia Dougherty, OP, PhD, Date Professor Emerita of History iii Copyright © 2018 by Brenda Derin All rights reserved iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract.……………………………………………………………………………….......
    [Show full text]
  • Experiences of Poverty in Early Industrial England
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2020 Worthy Widows, Feckless Fathers, and Innocent Babes: Experiences of Poverty in Early Industrial England Emma Diduch Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the European History Commons, History of Gender Commons, and the Labor History Commons Recommended Citation Diduch, Emma, "Worthy Widows, Feckless Fathers, and Innocent Babes: Experiences of Poverty in Early Industrial England" (2020). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1450. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1450 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Worthy Widows, Feckless Fathers, and Innocent Babes: Experiences of Poverty in Early Industrial England A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in History from The College of William and Mary by Emma Grace Diduch Accepted for _Highest Honors_________________________________ (Honors, High Honors, Highest Honors) _Amy Limoncelli_______________________________________ Professor Amy Limoncelli, Director ____Kathrin Levitan____________________________________ Professor Kathrin Levitan ____Deborah D. Morse____________________________________ Professor Deborah Morse Williamsburg,
    [Show full text]
  • Five Hundred Years of English Poor Laws, 1349-1834: Regulating the Working and Nonworking Poor William P
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Akron Law Review Akron Law Journals July 2015 Five Hundred Years of English Poor Laws, 1349-1834: Regulating the Working and Nonworking Poor William P. Quigley Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, and the Social Welfare Law Commons Recommended Citation Quigley, William P. (1997) "Five Hundred Years of English Poor Laws, 1349-1834: Regulating the Working and Nonworking Poor," Akron Law Review: Vol. 30 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol30/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Akron Law Journals at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Akron Law Review by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Quigley: Regulating the Working and Nonworking Poor Five Hundred Years of English Poor Laws, 1349-1834: Regulating the Working and Nonworking Poor by * William P. Quigley I. Introduction Like other and more famous English institutions, the making and administration of the English Poor Law was a growth, not a creation.1 Certain it is, that, on the welfare of its labouring Poor, the prosperity of a country essentially depends . Sir Frederic Eden, The State of the Poor (1797)2 The English poor laws, beginning with the Statute of Laborers of 1349-1350 and proceeding to the reforms of 1834, regulated both the working and nonworking poor.3 From feudalism through 500 years of regulation by the poor laws work and poverty journeyed hand in hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumblerphd2016.Pdf
    This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights and duplication or sale of all or part is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for research, private study, criticism/review or educational purposes. Electronic or print copies are for your own personal, non- commercial use and shall not be passed to any other individual. No quotation may be published without proper acknowledgement. For any other use, or to quote extensively from the work, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder/s. 1 Child poverty in Victorian Shropshire: children and the Shropshire Poor Law Unions 1834-1870 J. P. Sumbler Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Keele University December 2016 i Contents page Abstract ii Primary Sources iii Abbreviations iv List of Illustrations iv List of Tables iv List of Appendices vii Acknowledgements viii Map of Shropshire Poor Law Unions and Incorporations 1836 ix Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Shropshire and the Standard of Living of Shropshire Agricultural Labourers in the Middle Decades of the nineteenth Century 52 Chapter 3 The Domestic Life of Shropshire Workhouse Children 87 Chapter 4 Education in Shropshire Workhouses 144 Chapter 5 Medical Services in Shropshire Poor Law Unions 201 ii Chapter 6 Child Employment and Shropshire Unions 238 Chapter 7 Shropshire Poor Law Unions and Out-Relief 268 Chapter 8 Conclusion - Child Poverty in Victorian Shropshire: Children and the Shropshire Poor Law Unions - 1834-1870 342 Appendices 351 Bibliography 378 Child poverty in Victorian Shropshire: children and the Shropshire Poor Law Unions 1834 - 1870 Abstract This thesis examines the lives of poor children living in Shropshire between 1834 and 1870.
    [Show full text]
  • The Introduction and Operation of the New Poor Law in Suffolk 1834-70
    The Introduction and Operation of the New Poor Law in Suffolk 1834-70 Angela Miller A thesis submitted for the degree of PhD History Department University of Essex January 2020 Acknowledgements I gratefully acknowledge the help and patience of my supervisor, Peter Gurney, for his constant support, positive criticism and helpful suggestions in the production of this thesis. In addition, my former M.A. supervisor, and now friend, Dr. Jane Pearson, has shown a continued interest in the development of this work and I owe her a debt of gratitude I can never repay. 2 Abstract This thesis examines the introduction of the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 into Suffolk between the years 1834-71. It looks at the poor law system as it was immediately prior to this time and the increasing difficulties it faced in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. It also examines contemporary ideas on population growth, such as those popularised by Malthus, as well as those of Utilitarians and Noetics, all coalescing to bring about the change of 1834. It compares the situation in Suffolk with that in the rest of the country, looking specifically at the Houses of Industry and their adaptability to the new system and the particular impetus given by Dr. James Kay as Assistant Poor Law Commissioner in the county of Suffolk to achieving their conversion to Union workhouses. It examines the power structures surrounding the New Poor Law, particularly the relationship between the local Boards of Guardians and the central Poor Law Commission (and later Board.) It also looks at the power structures within the workhouse.
    [Show full text]
  • History 49 HISTORY
    History 49 clarifying major issues. A greater emphasis on pragmatism weakening of traditional ties in these communities. Because is leading to the development of practical and lens time-con- most transients were poor, their presence put a heavy burden suming techniques. Psychoanalytic therapy is here to stay, on the traditional practice of poor relief and encouraged a and its future can be viewed as a quest for principles and more systematic and rational view of the problem. The revi- operations that stand the test of scientific rigor. RIESHA LEVY sion of the state poor law in 1794 institutionalized these See Also: 79, 82, 97, 164, 166-67, 170, 177, 182, 185, 192, changes. ht brought an end to the warnings-out system 199, 201, 208, 210, 222-23, 227-29, 233, 245-46, 248-49, and provided towns with a more efficient method of removing 286-87. the unsettled poor. But it also required towns to provide im- mediate relief to all persons who needed it, regardless of their residence status, and it contributed in other ways to a HISTORY sharing and routinization of power that had earlier been left to the inclination of individual communities. JAMES LEIBY 270. BAUGH, D. A. The cost of poor relief in South-East England, 1790-1834. Economie History Review, 23(1): 50- 273. NEUMAN, R. P. Masturbation, madness, and the mod- Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/swra/article/13/1/49/1613756 by guest on 27 September 2021 68, 1975. ern concepts of childhood and adolescente. Journal of Social Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Uniqueness of the Clinton Welfare Reforms: a New Level of Social Misery?
    The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 28 Issue 3 September - Special Issue: Evaluation of Article 5 TANF September 2001 The Historical Uniqueness of the Clinton Welfare Reforms: A New Level of Social Misery? Larry Patriquin Nipissing University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Political Science Commons, Public Policy Commons, and the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Patriquin, Larry (2001) "The Historical Uniqueness of the Clinton Welfare Reforms: A New Level of Social Misery?," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 28 : Iss. 3 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol28/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Historical Uniqueness of the Clinton Welfare Reforms: A New Level of Social Misery? LARRY PATRIQUIN Nipissing University This essay argues that the 1996 reforms to the American welfare state have no historical precedent. They are not a return to "the poorhouse era" and are radically distinct from Great Britain's new poor law of 1834, to which they are often compared. America is the first advanced capitalist country to jettison a significantelement of its welfare state and, as such, is moving into waters that are uncharted and dangerous. The United States is implementing major "reforms" in an effort to realize President Bill Clinton's 1992 election pledge "to end welfare as we know it." The response of
    [Show full text]