Durham E-Theses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Durham E-Theses Durham E-Theses The new poor law and county Durham Dunkley, Peter James How to cite: Dunkley, Peter James (1971) The new poor law and county Durham, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10095/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk THE NEW POOH LAW AHD COUOTY DURHAM Peter James Dunkley Submitted for the M.A. Degree in the University of Durham, 9 July 1971* The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. ABSTRACT The thesis traces, in a general sense, the developments that directly led to the legislative refoxm of a poor relief system that had remained essentially unaltered since its inception two hundred years earlier* The impetus for the dismantling of the Old Poor Law is seen in largely economic texms - the breakdown of a traditional administrative scheme under the pressure of the dramatio fluctuations of an embryonic industrial society* After an extensive review of the provisions of the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act, the paper turns to a close examination of its imple• mentation in County Durham* The administrative framework erected in the latter 1830*8 receives careful attention* An attempt is made to ascertain Poor Law Commission policy and its actual application by local organs* It is found that although the form of poor relief administration was substantially altered by the new measure* in a substantive sense* the economic considerations that animated relief management in previous years continued to dictate* to a large extent* regional administrative practices after the introduction of the Act. despite increasing inter• ference by the Commission* TABLE OP COMTEMTS Prefatory Bote i INTRODUCE!Ofl 1 CHAPl'MH QUE The Coming of the Sew Poor Law 19 CHAPTER TWO The Hew Poor Lav 55 i«; The Commission 55 ii«. The Report 60 iii. The Bill 80 iv. The Act 96 Durham 1 Prelude 101 CHAPTER POUR Durhamt The First Tears 115 i. The Implementation 115 ii« The Hierarchy 124 iii. Outdoor Relief 140 iv. The Workhouses 154 v. Medical Relief 184 vi. The Parochial Authorities 192 vii. Opposition '202 CHAPTER FIVE Durham* Crisis and Reaction 212 CHAPTER SIX Conclusion 275 BIBLIOGRAPHY 290 i PREFATORY NOTE This is a long paper* Perhaps one might say it is too long for an M.A. degree, but I have been loath to extract what seems to me to be significant merely for the irrelevant reason that this is an M.A. and not an II* Litt* or Ph.D. thesis* Consequently) I have carried on, trusting to the indulgence of the reader* The reader will also notice that certain words in the text* with the exception of those found in quotations and proper nouns, are spelled in the manner peculiar to North America* This policy was decided upon for the sake of consistency; that is, if I had been compelled to adopt the English method, a mode of spelling wholly unfamiliar to me, it is certain that spellings of both types would have appeared inadvertently in the text* The original purpose of this paper was to examine in detail the 1834 Poor Lav Amendment Act and its specific application in the County of Durham. It became clear from the start, however, that the Act was basically a formulation of poor relief principles and attitudes that arose in the years following the Napoleonic wars and, accordingly, that a thorough investigation of the measure necessitated some reference to this pre-formulation period* More Importantly, certain developments in Durham following the implementation of the Act require an understanding of relief administration in the l820*s, if their full significance is to be appreciated* I have, therefore, prefaced the main feature of this thesis with general comments (including appropriate allusions to Durham) on poor relief prior to 1832 and on the shaping of the Act in the crucial years 1832-34* Although an inspection of this thirty-year period was bound to be time-consuming, both for the writer and the reader, I have sustained myself in the knowledge that this work encompasses the ii New Poor Law itself* as well as its history in County Durham* and that a comparison of the new with the old would be of value* I have drawn mostly on secondary sources and British Sessional Papers for the writing of the first two chapters* The general, more well-known books on the Ektglish poor laws may be looated in any tolerably supplied library) while certain contemporary works on early nineteenth- century Durham may be found in the local history collection of Durham University Library* The Sessional Papers are also deposited there) however* they are only available on microcard, which renders their examination a formidable task* The remaining portion of the thesis is based on four sets of primary informations the annual reports of the Poor Law Commissioners* boards of guardians* minutes* Ministry of Health Papers (Series 12), and local newspapers* From these materials X have been able to compile a reasonably complete picture of relief administration in eleven of Durham's fourteen poor law unions up to 1847* the year the Poor Law Commission was dissolved* The Stockton* Lanchester, and Weardale Unions are the areas for which I have been able to evolve only a sketchy idea as to administrative developments* In the oase of Stockton, by far the most important of the deficiencies, the reoords are unsatisfactory and, in some instances, non-existent* The minutes of this Board in the Durham County Beoord Office do not include any notations prior to the l880*s, and the Union correspondence on deposit at the Public Record Office in London is incomplete until well into the 1840*8. No similar alibi exists for the Lanchester and Weardale Unions; they are, I am afraid, merely victims of the exigencies of time* Nevertheless, the eleven areas coming under close scrutiny include the major unions in iii Durham, and being distributed evenly throughout the county, they represent every type of local characteristic* The original editions of the Poor Lav Commissioners* annual reports are relatively common} a complete Set is available in Durham University Library* A fairly extensive collection of guardians' minutes is located in the Durham County Record Office, although only five unions have records on deposit there for the period of this paper* Consequently, in order to examine the minute books of Durham's most important Union, Sunderland, the investigator must resort to the Central Reference Library in that town* The most definitive group of documents on poor relief administration in Durham is the correspondence of the Poor Lav Commissioners (Ministry of Health Papers), which may be seen at the Public Record Office in London* ThiB material includes observations by the Assistant Commissioner for the northern district, as veil as communi• cations with local administrators and ratepayers* It should be pointed out, however, that while these papers remain the most important single collection of primary poor law information, a concurrent review of regional records is advisable, in order to avoid a distorted impression of actual administrative practices* The investigator quickly learns that official correspondence did not always accurately reflect regional developments* I should like to record here my appreciation for assistance I have received during the writing of this thesis* Mr. P.A.J. Heesom of the University of Durham kindly read the paper in draft, and his encouragement enabled me to survive periodic fits of depression and doubt* I should also like to thank Dr. Norman MoCord of the University of Newcastle upon Tyne for his advice concerning the Ministry of Health iv Papers, and especially for his generosity in allowing me to see and make use of some of his transcripts of Poor Law Commission correspondence* The relevant material is noted in the bibliography* It goes without saying that I alone am responsible for any errors in the work* Gilesgate, Durham P.J.D. 6 July 1971 INTRODUCTION A dl8oussion of the Poor Lav Amendment Act of 1834 is certain to be incomplete without at least a cursory look at what is known as the Old Poor Law, being a convenient term for the myriad, of poor lav admin• istrative methods practiced throughout England under the problematical provisions of the 43rd of Elizabeth (l60l). The New Poor Lav, as the Amendment Act is commonly called, was conceived, adopted, and developed as a direct consequence of the alleged foibles of the Old Poor Lav, most particularly those of the famous Speenhamland system of poor relief, the supplementation of wages by allowances* The Royal Commission of 1832, constituted to review the poor lav administration of England and from whose report came the recommendations that formed the basis of the New Poor Lav, found that by that period the allowance system had "spread over almost every part of the country, and into the manufacturing towns • • • [and] the evil • • • is, on the whole, steadily and rapidly pro• gressive ."^ On the other hand, scholars have suspected for some time, for reasons discussed later, that the Commissioners greatly exaggerated the importance and extent of the allowance system, and two recent articles 2 by Dr* Mark Blaug have given evidential weight to these suspicions* [Royal Commission,] Extracts Tfrom the Information Received by His Majesty *sCoinm< Minn ers.
Recommended publications
  • Zn the Nineteenth Century
    INTERNATIONAL LIBRARY OF SOCIOLOGY British AND SOCIAL RECONSTRUCTION Founded by Karl Mannhelm Social Work Editor W. J. H. Sprott zn the Nineteenth Century by A. F. Young and E. T. Ashton BC B 20623 73 9177 A catalogue of books available In the IN'rERNATIONAL LlDRARY OF ROUTLEDGE & KEGAN PAUL LTD SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL RECONSTRUCTION and new books m Broadway House, 68-74 Carter Lane preparation for the Library will be found at the end of this volume London, E.C.4 UIA-BIBLIOTHEEK 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 """ ------------------------ Text continues after this page ------------------------ This publication is made available in the context of the history of social work project. See www.historyofsocialwork.org It is our aim to respect authors’ and publishers’ copyright. Should you feel we violated those, please do get in touch with us. Deze publicatie wordt beschikbaar gesteld in het kader van de canon sociaal werk. Zie www.canonsociaalwerk.eu Het is onze wens de rechten van auteurs en uitgevers te respecten. Mocht je denken dat we daarin iets fout doen, gelieve ons dan te contacteren. ------------------------ Tekst gaat verder na deze pagina ------------------------ r-= ! First published in 1956 I by Routledge and Kegan Paul Lld Broadway House, 68-74 Carter Lane London, E.C.4 Second impresszon 1963 I Third impression 1967 Printed in Great Britatn by CONTENTS Butler and Tanner Ltd Acknowledgments vu Frome and London I Introduction page I I . PART ONE I ' IDEAS WHICH INFLUENCED THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL WORK L I Influence of social and economic thought 7 I ConditWns-2 EcoROImc and Political Theories 2 Religious thought in the nineteenth century 28 I The Church if Engtar.d-2 The Tractarians-g Tilt Chris- tian Socialists-4 The JYonconformists-5 The Methodists- 6 The Unitarians-7 The Q.uakers-8 Conclusion 3 Influence of poor law prinClples and practice 43 I TIre problems and principles of poor law administration- 2 Criticisms by Social Workers and thezr results PART TWO MAIN BRANCHES OF SOCIAL WORK 4 Family case work-I.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Poor Law and the Struggle for Union Chargeability
    MA URICE CA PLAN THE NEW POOR LAW AND THE STRUGGLE FOR UNION CHARGEABILITY Thrasymachus: "Listen then. I define justice or right as what is in the interest of the stronger party." Plato, The Republic, I, St. 338 While much has been heard in recent times of the evils attaching to "the principles of 1834", other important aspects of the New Poor Law have been seriously neglected. The laws of settlement and removal were unjust and inhumane, and the system of parochial rating was anomalous, uneven and, indeed, thoroughly iniquitous. One of the main features of the Poor Law Amendment Act had been the grouping of the parishes of England and Wales into unions of parishes. Those of a medium-sized town usually constituted one union, while in the countryside the typical union tended to comprise all the parishes within a radius of up to about ten miles of a country town, its centre. Under the Act, the administration of the Poor Law was based on the union and not, as heretofore, on the parish; yet the latter remained the financial unit, each parish being chargeable for its own Poor Law expenditure. This uneven arrangement prevented the effective oper- ation of the Act, and, as will be shown, had unhappy consequences. Attempts at reform in these matters were strenuously opposed in Parlia- ment between 1845 and 1865, and only in the latter year was the Union Chargeability Act passed. The purpose of the present article is to show that the main opposition to reform came from a section of the landed interest whose object was to maintain the status quo with regard to settlement law and to keep alive the pernicious distinction between open and close parishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Poverty in Victorian England and Wales
    How Cruel was the Victorian Workhouse/Poor Law Union? ‘Living the Poorlife’ Paul Carter November 2009 MH 12/10320, Clutton Poor Law Union correspondence, 1834 – 1838. Coloured, hand drawn map of the parishes within the Clutton Poor Law Union, Somerset. 1836. Llanfyllin Workhouse Poor Law Report of the Commissioners, 1834. 1. Outdoor relief to continue for the aged and infirm – but abolished for the able bodied – who would be „offered the house‟. 2. Conditions in the workhouse to be „less eligible‟ than that of the lowest paid labourer. * To make the workhouse a feared institution of last resort. 3. Establish a central Poor Law Commission with three commissioners to oversee the poor law and create/impose national uniformity. 4. Parishes to be joined together in Poor Law Unions, share a central workhouse, governed by elected guardians, run by a master/mistress of the house. Poor Law Commission Somerset House George Nicholls, Frankland Lewis and John George Shaw-Lefevre Edwin Chadwick Assistant Poor Law Commissioners (secretary) Central workhouse 300: Poor Law Union (Board 1834-1839 of Guardians) Master/Mistress Parish A. Parish B. Parish C. Parish D. Clerk to the Guardians MH 12: Poor Law Union Correspondence 16,741 volumes. 10,881,650 folios. 21,763,300 pages. c. 200 words per page. 4,352,660,000 words. Berwick upon Tweed Tynemouth Reeth Liverpool Keighley Mansfield Basford (North Staffs) Wolstanton and Buslem, and Newcastle under Lyme Llanfyllin (North Worcs) Cardiff Kidderminster and Bromsgrove Mitford and Launditch Blything Newport Pagnell Bishops Stortford Rye Truro Axminster Clutton Southampton MH 12/5967 Liverpool Select Vestry.
    [Show full text]
  • 111077NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ' "-1- ~ : • ,. - .. _.~ , . .• • • //1 077 111077 U.S. Department of Justice Nationat Institute of Justice ThIs document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are Ihose of the authors and do not necessarily represent the offIcial position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. PermiSSIon to reproduce thIs copyrighted material has been granted by Northumbria Poljce Department to the National Crimmal Justice Reference Service (NCJHS). Further reproductIon outsIde of the NCJRS system reqUIres p,,,mls, sIan of the copYright owner. Force Headquatters Ponteland Newcastle upon Tyne April 1988 To The Right Honourable the Secretary of state for the Home Department and to the Chairman and Members of the Northumbria Police Authority. Sir. Mr Chairman. Ladies and Gentlemen. The following report on the policing of Northumbria has been prepared in compliance with Sections 12( I) and 30( 2) of the Police Act 1964. I have the honour to be. Sir, Ladies and Gentlemen, Your obedient servant. Sir Stanley E Bailey. CBE. QPM. DL. CBIM Chief Constable 2 Acknowledgements of Public Motor and Motorcycle Patrols 71 Assistance 88 Multi-agency Initiatives 54 Adm1n!stration 88 NALGO 89 Annual Inspection of the Force 89 Newcastle 19 AppencUces A· R (Statistics) 97 Northern 13 Casualty Bureau 61 North Tyneslde and Blyth 23 Central Ticket Office 73 Northumbria Crime Squad 47 The ChIef
    [Show full text]
  • Durham. Sunderland
    DIRECTORY. J DURHAM. SUNDERLAND. 439 ROKER is about r mile north-east from Srmderland] electors on the parliamentary register in 1914 wa& bridge; it is situated on an eminence, and from its 31,320. position commands an extensive 11~d "Bgreeable view of The population of the municipal wards in 1911 was: the ~orth Sea; beneath the chff known as "Holy Bishopwearmouth, 9,51 s; Bridge, 12,295; Central, 8,375; R~k ~he land_ shelve~ gently ~owards ~ sandy beach Colliery, 7,332 ; Deptford, 10,002 ; East, 8,691 ; Hendon, wh1ch_ Is provided w1~h bath_mg-maohmes; to the 8,674 ; Monkwearmouth, 7,92s; Monkwearmouth Shore, west 1~ Roker Park, lrud out m 188o ~ a~d seaward, 9,0s4 ; Pallion, 9,145 ; Park, 9,2a7 ; Roker, 9,965; St. extendmg from Holy Rock to the New P1er, IS a terrace l\Iichael 7 722 · Sunderland 9 343 · Thornhill 12 471 • i1 . l h h . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' t promenade, a b out a quarter o f a m e m engt ; t e p1er, west 11 327 which branches out from its southern extremity, ' ' · . reaches to a distance of 2,soo feet; a little to the south The populatiOn of the ecc~e~Iast1cal p~nshes m 19,n. is the North Dock, and the piers and lighthouses; to was Sunderland: Holy Tnmty, 6,3ro, S~. John s, the north-east is Whitburn. 6,472 ; .Ayres. Quay : St. Stephen's, 4,02~; Bishopwear­ mouth: Christ Church, 4,328; St. Gabr1el's, g,og6; St. SOUTHWI'CK is a parish west of Monkwearmouth, on ~ichael and All .Angels, g,oo3 ; St.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF LAW, ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES School of Social Sciences Poor Law Reform and Policy Innovation in Rural Southern England, c.1780-1850 by Samantha Anne Shave Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2010 i UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF LAW, ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Doctor of Philosophy POOR LAW REFORM AND POLICY INNOVATION IN RURAL SOUTHERN ENGLAND, c.1780-1850 by Samantha Anne Shave Recent analysis in poor law history has uncovered the experiences of individual relief claimants and recipients, emphasising their role in the welfare process. The literature has, however, tended to draw a false dichotomy between understanding the experiences of the individual poor and understanding the administration of the poor laws. This thesis deploys a ‘policy process’ understanding of social policies, a concept developed in the social sciences, to understand the processes driving social policies under the poor laws.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poor Law Report Reexamined Mark Blaug
    Mark Blaug TheJournal Poor of Economic Law HistoryReport, vol. Reexamined 24, n° 2, June 1964 N AN earlier article, I pleaded for a reappraisal of the Old Poor I Law.1 Despite what all the books say, the evidence that we have does not suggest that the English Poor Law as it operated before its amendment in 1834 reduced the efficiency of agricultural workers, promoted population growth, lowered wages, depressed rents, destroyed yeomanry, and compounded the burden on rate- payers. Beyond this purely negative argument, I tried to show that the Old Poor Law was essentially a device for dealing with the problems of structural unemployment and substandard wages in the lagging rural sector of a rapidly growing but still under- developed economy. It constituted, so to speak, "a welfare state in miniature," combining elements of wage-escalation, family allow- ances, unemployment compensation, and public works, all of which were administered and financed on a local level. Far from having an inhibitory effect, it probably contributed to economic expansion. At any rate, from the economic point of view, things were much the same after 1834 as before. The Poor Laws Amendment Act of 1834 marked a revolution in British social administration, but it left the structure of relief policy substantially unchanged. In the earlier article, I criticized the commissioners who prepared the famous Poor Law Report of 1834 for the manner in which they marshaled the evidence against the existing system, noting that the elaborate questionnaire which they circulated among the parishes was never analyzed or reduced to summary form.
    [Show full text]
  • PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW of SUNDERLAND Final
    THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SUNDERLAND Final Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in the City of Sunderland October 2003 SOUTH BENTS Sheet 2 of 3 Sheet 2 "This map is reproduced from the OS map by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD03114G" 2 Abattoir 1 Monkwearmouth School Nine Wells S Gardens H I E N L EW D C S AS Allotment Gardens T R LE Seaburn Dene O RO AD A Primary School D Mere Knolls Cemetery 3 Whitburn Sands FULWELL WARD FULWELL S Refuse Tip E A (disused) L Seaburn A N Park N E Und Straight E W Nursing Home C A S T L E R Parson's O Fulwell School OAD Roker Cliff R A ER W Playing Field HEST Rocks D CHIC Park H Infant AD I EA RO T S C School H Primary U R School C H R D Primary School Hylton Red House School WITHERWACK DOWNHILL School E D Club M A SW O O R RT N E H O D N R T A O L A A R O L D A R Church N OAD H Y R CARLEY HILL S EMBLE C O W L T Carley Hill L L O Y O Primary School L N H D K M E Southwick I L R L Cemetery Playing Field R E O M A D SIDE CLIFF ROAD E AV OD WO F LE U AP L REDHILL WARD M W S E Allotment Gardens RE L C L Y E R RL MA O A D D A D O Roker Park OA R Maplewood R R N CA O ED S School R P M MARLEY POTS Carley Hill O H Cricket Ground T M OR AY D Schools ST ROKER DCAR ROA RE Monkwearmouth Schools Church College SOUTHWICK WARD Hospital WA SH ING TO N R AD O ON RO AD HYLT ORTH N
    [Show full text]
  • Northumberland and Durham Family History Society Unwanted
    Northumberland and Durham Family History Society baptism birth marriage No Gsurname Gforename Bsurname Bforename dayMonth year place death No Bsurname Bforename Gsurname Gforename dayMonth year place all No surname forename dayMonth year place Marriage 933ABBOT Mary ROBINSON James 18Oct1851 Windermere Westmorland Marriage 588ABBOT William HADAWAY Ann 25 Jul1869 Tynemouth Marriage 935ABBOTT Edwin NESS Sarah Jane 20 Jul1882 Wallsend Parrish Church Northumbrland Marriage1561ABBS Maria FORDER James 21May1861 Brooke, Norfolk Marriage 1442 ABELL Thirza GUTTERIDGE Amos 3 Aug 1874 Eston Yorks Death 229 ADAM Ellen 9 Feb 1967 Newcastle upon Tyne Death 406 ADAMS Matilda 11 Oct 1931 Lanchester Co Durham Marriage 2326ADAMS Sarah Elizabeth SOMERSET Ernest Edward 26 Dec 1901 Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne Marriage1768ADAMS Thomas BORTON Mary 16Oct1849 Coughton Northampton Death 1556 ADAMS Thomas 15 Jan 1908 Brackley, Norhants,Oxford Bucks Birth 3605 ADAMS Sarah Elizabeth 18 May 1876 Stockton Co Durham Marriage 568 ADAMSON Annabell HADAWAY Thomas William 30 Sep 1885 Tynemouth Death 1999 ADAMSON Bryan 13 Aug 1972 Newcastle upon Tyne Birth 835 ADAMSON Constance 18 Oct 1850 Tynemouth Birth 3289ADAMSON Emma Jane 19Jun 1867Hamsterley Co Durham Marriage 556 ADAMSON James Frederick TATE Annabell 6 Oct 1861 Tynemouth Marriage1292ADAMSON Jane HARTBURN John 2Sep1839 Stockton & Sedgefield Co Durham Birth 3654 ADAMSON Julie Kristina 16 Dec 1971 Tynemouth, Northumberland Marriage 2357ADAMSON June PORTER William Sidney 1May 1980 North Tyneside East Death 747 ADAMSON
    [Show full text]
  • The Poor Law of Lunacy
    The Poor Law of Lunacy: The Administration of Pauper Lunatics in Mid-Nineteenth Century England with special Emphasis on Leicestershire and Rutland Peter Bartlett Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University College London. University of London 1993 Abstract Previous historical studies of the care of the insane in nineteenth century England have been based in the history of medicine. In this thesis, such care is placed in the context of the English poor law. The theory of the 1834 poor law was essentially silent on the treatment of the insane. That did not mean that developments in poor law had no effect only that the effects must be established by examination of administrative practices. To that end, this thesis focuses on the networks of administration of the poor law of lunacy, from 1834 to 1870. County asylums, a creation of the old (pre-1834) poor law, grew in numbers and scale only under the new poor law. While remaining under the authority of local Justices of the Peace, mid-century legislation provided an increasing role for local poor law staff in the admissions process. At the same time, workhouse care of the insane increased. Medical specialists in lunacy were generally excluded from local admissions decisions. The role of central commissioners was limited to inspecting and reporting; actual decision-making remained at the local level. The webs of influence between these administrators are traced, and the criteria they used to make decisions identified. The Leicestershire and Rutland Lunatic asylum provides a local study of these relations. Particular attention is given to admission documents and casebooks for those admitted to the asylum between 1861 and 1865.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poor in England Steven King Is Reader in History at Contribution to the Historiography of Poverty, Combining As It Oxford Brookes University
    king&t jkt 6/2/03 2:57 PM Page 1 Alannah Tomkins is Lecturer in History at ‘Each chapter is fluently written and deeply immersed in the University of Keele. primary sources. The work as a whole makes an original The poor in England Steven King is Reader in History at contribution to the historiography of poverty, combining as it Oxford Brookes University. does a high degree of scholarship with intellectual innovation.’ The poor Professor Anne Borsay, University of Wales, Swansea This fascinating collection of studies investigates English poverty in England between 1700 and 1850 and the ways in which the poor made ends meet. The phrase ‘economy of makeshifts’ has often been used to summarise the patchy, disparate and sometimes failing 1700–1850 strategies of the poor for material survival. Incomes or benefits derived through the ‘economy’ ranged from wages supported by under-employment via petty crime through to charity; however, An economy of makeshifts until now, discussions of this array of makeshifts usually fall short of answering vital questions about how and when the poor secured access to them. This book represents the single most significant attempt in print to supply the English ‘economy of makeshifts’ with a solid, empirical basis and to advance the concept of makeshifts from a vague but convenient label to a more precise yet inclusive definition. 1700–1850 Individual chapters written by some of the leading, emerging historians of welfare examine how advantages gained from access to common land, mobilisation of kinship support, crime, and other marginal resources could prop up struggling households.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Guide 6 – Turnpike Road Records
    Durham County Record Office County Hall Durham DH1 5UL Telephone: 03000 267619 Email: [email protected] Website: www.durhamrecordoffice.org.uk Subject Guide 6 – Turnpike Road Records Issue no. 5 July 2020 Maintenance of The King’s Highway had been the responsibility of parish authorities until around 1700. Turnpike Trusts then took over the construction and maintenance of major roads, until the creation of Highway Boards in 1878 (and then County Councils in 1889). Listed below are the trusts which existed in County Durham (and in that part of the North Riding of Yorkshire which became part of Durham in 1974). The limits within which they operated are given (together with approximate current road numbers), as are the dates of the Acts of Parliament which authorised their operations. A brief indication is given of relevant records held in the Durham County Record Office. The Record Office also holds a set of local Acts of Parliament (into which category most Turnpike Acts fell) from 1798, and these may be consulted in the Search Room. ALLENDALE Allenheads – Cowshill [B6295] Acts: 1826, 1853, 1875 Deposited plan, 1825 Q/D/P 20 BISHOPWEARMOUTH AND NORTON Bishopwearmouth (Sunderland) – Norton (Stockton) [A19] Acts: 1789, 1811, 1832, 1875 Deposited plan, 1831 Q/D/P 42 Sale of tollhouse sites, 1873-1877 Q/D/B 1 (pp.438-446) BOROUGHBRIDGE, CATTERICK AND PIERCEBRIDGE Boroughbridge - Catterick - Piercebridge [A1, B6275] Acts: 1742, 1749, 1784, 1803, 1825, 1862, 1875 Act, 1742 D/St/X2/1 BOROUGHBRIDGE, DARLINGTON AND DURHAM Boroughbridge - Northallerton - Croft Bridge - Darlington - Durham [A167] Acts: 1745, 1749, 1792, 1801, 1812, 1832, 1868, 1871 Mortgage bond, 1746 D/X 107/1 Toll lease bond, 1761 D/X 107/2 Resolutions concerning possible amalgamation, 1822 D/HH 2/16/202 Letter relating to dividend payments, 1825 D/X 107/6 Deposited plan of improvements, 1831 Q/D/P 39 Receipts for repayment of capital, 1843/1848 D/X 107/7-8 Plan (Entercommon to Darlington), n.d.
    [Show full text]