Mouse Taf1a Knockout Project (CRISPR/Cas9)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mouse Taf1a Knockout Project (CRISPR/Cas9) https://www.alphaknockout.com Mouse Taf1a Knockout Project (CRISPR/Cas9) Objective: To create a Taf1a knockout Mouse model (C57BL/6J) by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Strategy summary: The Taf1a gene (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_021466 ; Ensembl: ENSMUSG00000072258 ) is located on Mouse chromosome 1. 13 exons are identified, with the ATG start codon in exon 2 and the TAG stop codon in exon 13 (Transcript: ENSMUST00000097043). Exon 2~5 will be selected as target site. Cas9 and gRNA will be co-injected into fertilized eggs for KO Mouse production. The pups will be genotyped by PCR followed by sequencing analysis. Note: Exon 2 starts from the coding region. Exon 2~5 covers 44.67% of the coding region. The size of effective KO region: ~9881 bp. The KO region does not have any other known gene. Page 1 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com Overview of the Targeting Strategy Wildtype allele 5' gRNA region gRNA region 3' 1 2 3 4 5 13 Legends Exon of mouse Taf1a Knockout region Page 2 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com Overview of the Dot Plot (up) Window size: 15 bp Forward Reverse Complement Sequence 12 Note: The 1830 bp section upstream of Exon 2 is aligned with itself to determine if there are tandem repeats. No significant tandem repeat is found in the dot plot matrix. So this region is suitable for PCR screening or sequencing analysis. Overview of the Dot Plot (down) Window size: 15 bp Forward Reverse Complement Sequence 12 Note: The 1818 bp section downstream of Exon 5 is aligned with itself to determine if there are tandem repeats. No significant tandem repeat is found in the dot plot matrix. So this region is suitable for PCR screening or sequencing analysis. Page 3 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com Overview of the GC Content Distribution (up) Window size: 300 bp Sequence 12 Summary: Full Length(1830bp) | A(24.04% 440) | C(21.26% 389) | T(30.71% 562) | G(23.99% 439) Note: The 1830 bp section upstream of Exon 2 is analyzed to determine the GC content. No significant high GC-content region is found. So this region is suitable for PCR screening or sequencing analysis. Overview of the GC Content Distribution (down) Window size: 300 bp Sequence 12 Summary: Full Length(1818bp) | A(24.31% 442) | C(22.88% 416) | T(28.71% 522) | G(24.09% 438) Note: The 1818 bp section downstream of Exon 5 is analyzed to determine the GC content. No significant high GC-content region is found. So this region is suitable for PCR screening or sequencing analysis. Page 4 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com BLAT Search Results (up) QUERY SCORE START END QSIZE IDENTITY CHROM STRAND START END SPAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- browser details YourSeq 1830 1 1830 1830 100.0% chr1 + 183389092 183390921 1830 browser details YourSeq 225 1122 1602 1830 91.2% chr2 + 164918620 164918971 352 browser details YourSeq 224 1125 1602 1830 90.1% chr5 + 127634254 127634572 319 browser details YourSeq 203 1122 1478 1830 91.6% chr2 - 70859980 70860233 254 browser details YourSeq 203 1122 1570 1830 99.1% chr3 + 52475514 52476166 653 browser details YourSeq 201 1122 1603 1830 89.0% chr7 - 123045985 123046246 262 browser details YourSeq 201 1125 1432 1830 91.8% chr16 - 37875692 37875900 209 browser details YourSeq 201 1122 1654 1830 90.0% chr11 - 107516284 107516491 208 browser details YourSeq 200 1119 1572 1830 90.5% chr8 + 69678486 69678798 313 browser details YourSeq 200 1122 1649 1830 98.1% chr3 + 152545811 152546426 616 browser details YourSeq 200 1117 1615 1830 95.5% chr13 + 14602621 14603234 614 browser details YourSeq 198 1125 1335 1830 99.5% chr1 - 63184135 63184573 439 browser details YourSeq 196 1109 1313 1830 99.1% chr11 + 63983956 63984166 211 browser details YourSeq 194 1122 1330 1830 96.1% chr8 - 98904473 98904678 206 browser details YourSeq 194 1124 1331 1830 95.6% chr3 - 78511591 78511795 205 browser details YourSeq 194 1122 1323 1830 99.5% chr18 + 36835967 36836186 220 browser details YourSeq 193 1113 1312 1830 98.5% chr6 - 122287368 122287575 208 browser details YourSeq 193 1124 1320 1830 98.0% chr3 - 15978450 15978645 196 browser details YourSeq 193 1122 1339 1830 94.5% chr2 + 55305514 55305716 203 browser details YourSeq 192 1122 1315 1830 99.5% chr8 - 57734338 57734531 194 Note: The 1830 bp section upstream of Exon 2 is BLAT searched against the genome. No significant similarity is found. BLAT Search Results (down) QUERY SCORE START END QSIZE IDENTITY CHROM STRAND START END SPAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- browser details YourSeq 1818 1 1818 1818 100.0% chr1 + 183400803 183402620 1818 browser details YourSeq 185 931 1433 1818 94.4% chr11 - 115372010 115625172 253163 browser details YourSeq 141 913 1410 1818 88.6% chr1 + 134412387 134412911 525 browser details YourSeq 113 1011 1411 1818 77.0% chr5 - 137687399 137687618 220 browser details YourSeq 96 893 1086 1818 90.9% chr16 + 91958588 91958788 201 browser details YourSeq 92 915 1411 1818 88.0% chr13 - 100629946 100891113 261168 browser details YourSeq 92 916 1086 1818 90.5% chr1 - 179150689 179150863 175 browser details YourSeq 90 909 1079 1818 77.6% chr15 + 80786192 80786365 174 browser details YourSeq 89 558 1079 1818 76.8% chr9 - 40813295 40813695 401 browser details YourSeq 87 565 1079 1818 77.2% chr15 - 27218720 27219120 401 browser details YourSeq 86 913 1086 1818 86.4% chr2 - 122210926 122557423 346498 browser details YourSeq 83 893 1071 1818 87.7% chr11 + 101072850 101073041 192 browser details YourSeq 81 951 1085 1818 86.0% chr2 + 35418931 35419067 137 browser details YourSeq 80 610 1004 1818 77.0% chr1 - 89355056 89355440 385 browser details YourSeq 80 906 1077 1818 83.9% chr2 + 104001618 104001786 169 browser details YourSeq 77 953 1079 1818 84.3% chr1 - 175783850 175783977 128 browser details YourSeq 76 938 1085 1818 84.1% chr18 + 53343854 53344004 151 browser details YourSeq 75 951 1087 1818 82.1% chr12 - 103310221 103310360 140 browser details YourSeq 75 951 1471 1818 86.6% chr4 + 107911596 107912176 581 browser details YourSeq 74 938 1081 1818 85.6% chr4 - 152074625 152074769 145 Note: The 1818 bp section downstream of Exon 5 is BLAT searched against the genome. No significant similarity is found. Page 5 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com Gene and protein information: Taf1a TATA-box binding protein associated factor, RNA polymerase I, A [ Mus musculus (house mouse) ] Gene ID: 21339, updated on 12-Aug-2019 Gene summary Official Symbol Taf1a provided by MGI Official Full Name TATA-box binding protein associated factor, RNA polymerase I, A provided by MGI Primary source MGI:MGI:109578 See related Ensembl:ENSMUSG00000072258 Gene type protein coding RefSeq status VALIDATED Organism Mus musculus Lineage Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Euteleostomi; Mammalia; Eutheria; Euarchontoglires; Glires; Rodentia; Myomorpha; Muroidea; Muridae; Murinae; Mus; Mus Also known as TAFI48; mTAFI48 Annotation Annotation category: suggests misassembly information Annotation category: partial on reference assembly Expression Ubiquitous expression in CNS E11.5 (RPKM 7.3), bladder adult (RPKM 6.9) and 27 other tissues See more Orthologs human all Genomic context Location: 1; 1 H5 See Taf1a in Genome Data Viewer Exon count: 11 Annotation release Status Assembly Chr Location 108 current GRCm38.p6 (GCF_000001635.26) 1 NC_000067.6 (183388885..183410201) Build 37.2 previous assembly MGSCv37 (GCF_000001635.18) 1 NT_165754.2 (362233..383549) Chromosome 1 - NC_000067.6 Page 6 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com Transcript information: This gene has 3 transcripts Gene: Taf1a ENSMUSG00000072258 Description TATA-box binding protein associated factor, RNA polymerase I, A [Source:MGI Symbol;Acc:MGI:109578] Gene Synonyms mTAFI48 Location Chromosome 1: 183,388,981-183,410,198 forward strand. GRCm38:CM000994.2 About this gene This gene has 3 transcripts (splice variants), 192 orthologues and is a member of 1 Ensembl protein family. Transcripts Name Transcript ID bp Protein Translation ID Biotype CCDS UniProt Flags Taf1a-201 ENSMUST00000097043.10 1472 453aa ENSMUSP00000094808.5 Protein coding - J3KMG9 TSL:5 GENCODE basic APPRIS P1 Taf1a-202 ENSMUST00000192076.1 1254 360aa ENSMUSP00000142213.1 Protein coding - A0A0A6YXZ8 CDS 3' incomplete TSL:5 Taf1a-203 ENSMUST00000195798.1 1119 91aa ENSMUSP00000141334.1 Protein coding - A0A0A6YW00 CDS 5' incomplete TSL:2 41.22 kb Forward strand 183.38Mb 183.39Mb 183.40Mb 183.41Mb 183.42Mb Genes (Comprehensive set... Taf1a-201 >protein coding Gm37986-201 >lncRNA Taf1a-202 >protein coding Taf1a-203 >protein coding Hhipl2-201 >protein coding Hhipl2-202 >protein coding Hhipl2-204 >lncRNA Hhipl2-203 >lncRNA Contigs CAAA01083517.1 > CAAA01117637.1 > Regulatory Build 183.38Mb 183.39Mb 183.40Mb 183.41Mb 183.42Mb Reverse strand 41.22 kb Regulation Legend CTCF Open Chromatin Promoter Promoter Flank Gene Legend Protein Coding merged Ensembl/Havana Ensembl protein coding Non-Protein Coding RNA gene Page 7 of 8 https://www.alphaknockout.com Transcript: ENSMUST00000097043 20.37 kb Forward strand Taf1a-201 >protein coding ENSMUSP00000094... Low complexity (Seg) Pfam TATA box-binding protein-associated factor RNA polymerase I subunit A-like PIRSF RNA polymerase I, subunit A (TATA-binding protein-associated factor) PANTHER PTHR32122 All sequence SNPs/i... Sequence variants (dbSNP and all other sources) Variant Legend missense variant splice region variant synonymous variant Scale bar 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 453 We wish to acknowledge the following valuable scientific information resources: Ensembl, MGI, NCBI, UCSC. Page 8 of 8.
Recommended publications
  • Bidirectional Cooperation Between Ubtf1 and SL1 Determines RNA Polymerase I Promoter
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.07.447350; this version posted June 7, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Bidirectional cooperation between Ubtf1 and SL1 determines RNA Polymerase I promoter 2 recognition in cell and is negatively affected in the UBTF-E210K neuroregression syndrome. 3 4 Michel G. Tremblay1, Dany S. Sibai1,2, Melissa Valère1,2, Jean-Clément Mars1,2,+, Frédéric Lessard1, 5 Roderick T. Hori3, Mohammad M. Khan4, Victor Y. Stefanovsky1, Mark S. Ledoux5 and Tom Moss1,2*. 6 7 1Laboratory of Growth and Development, St-Patrick Research Group in Basic Oncology, Cancer 8 Division of the Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec, Canada. 2Department of 9 Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, 10 Québec, Canada. 3Departments of Microbiology, Immunology and Biochemistry and 4Departments of 11 Neurology and Anatomy & Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, 12 TN, USA. 5Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis TN and Veracity 13 Neuroscience LLC, Memphis, TN 14 15 +Present address, IRIC, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada 16 17 Correspondence should be addressed to; 18 Tom Moss, PhD, 19 Edifice St Patrick, 9 rue McMahon, Québec, QC, G1R 3S3, Canada. 20 E-mail. [email protected] 21 Tel. 1 418 691 5281 22 FAX 1 418 691 5439 23 24 Short title: Ubtf1-SL1 cooperation and the Ubtf-E210K syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Noelia Díaz Blanco
    Effects of environmental factors on the gonadal transcriptome of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax), juvenile growth and sex ratios Noelia Díaz Blanco Ph.D. thesis 2014 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree from the Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF). This work has been carried out at the Group of Biology of Reproduction (GBR), at the Department of Renewable Marine Resources of the Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC). Thesis supervisor: Dr. Francesc Piferrer Professor d’Investigació Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC) i ii A mis padres A Xavi iii iv Acknowledgements This thesis has been made possible by the support of many people who in one way or another, many times unknowingly, gave me the strength to overcome this "long and winding road". First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Francesc Piferrer, for his patience, guidance and wise advice throughout all this Ph.D. experience. But above all, for the trust he placed on me almost seven years ago when he offered me the opportunity to be part of his team. Thanks also for teaching me how to question always everything, for sharing with me your enthusiasm for science and for giving me the opportunity of learning from you by participating in many projects, collaborations and scientific meetings. I am also thankful to my colleagues (former and present Group of Biology of Reproduction members) for your support and encouragement throughout this journey. To the “exGBRs”, thanks for helping me with my first steps into this world. Working as an undergrad with you Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Abnormalities in Two Patients with Features of Autosomal Dominant Robinow Syndrome
    ß 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 143A:1790–1795 (2007) Research Letter Chromosome Abnormalities in Two Patients With Features of Autosomal Dominant Robinow Syndrome Juliana F. Mazzeu,1 Ana Cristina Krepischi-Santos,1 Carla Rosenberg,1 Karoly Szuhai,2 Jeroen Knijnenburg,2 Janneke M.M. Weiss,3 Irina Kerkis,1 Zan Mustacchi,4 Guilherme Colin,5 Roˆmulo Mombach,6 Rita de Ca´ssia M. Pavanello,1 Paulo A. Otto,1 and Angela M. Vianna-Morgante1* 1Centro de Estudos do Genoma Humano, Departamento de Gene´tica e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biocieˆncias, Universidade de Sa˜o Paulo, Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil 2Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands 3Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands 4Hospital Infantil Darcy Vargas, Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil 5Departamento de Gene´tica Me´dica, Univille, Joinville, Brazil 6Centrinho Prefeito Luiz Gomes, Secretaria Municipal de Sau´de, Joinville, Brazil Received 13 April 2006; Accepted 13 December 2006 How to cite this article: Mazzeu JF, Krepischi-Santos AC, Rosenberg C, Szuhai K, Knijnenburg J, Weiss JMM, Kerkis I, Mustacchi Z, Colin G, Mombach R, Pavanello RM, Otto PA, Vianna-Morgante AM. 2007. Chromosome abnormalities in two patients with features of autosomal dominant Robinow syndrome. Am J Med Genet Part A 143A:1790–1795. To the Editor: Patient 1 Robinow syndrome [OMIM 180700] is characteriz- At age 3 4/12 years the girl was diagnosed as ed by fetal facies, mesomelic dwarfism, and hypo- affected by DRS (Fig. 1A). Detailed clinical examina- plastic genitalia.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide Binding of the Orphan Nuclear Receptor TR4 Suggests Its General Role in Fundamental Biological Processes
    O’Geen et al. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:689 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/11/689 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Genome-wide binding of the orphan nuclear receptor TR4 suggests its general role in fundamental biological processes Henriette O’Geen1†, Yu-Hsuan Lin2,3†, Xiaoqin Xu1, Lorigail Echipare1, Vitalina M Komashko1, Daniel He1, Seth Frietze1, Osamu Tanabe2, Lihong Shi2, Maureen A Sartor3, James D Engel2, Peggy J Farnham1* Abstract Background: The orphan nuclear receptor TR4 (human testicular receptor 4 or NR2C2) plays a pivotal role in a variety of biological and metabolic processes. With no known ligand and few known target genes, the mode of TR4 function was unclear. Results: We report the first genome-wide identification and characterization of TR4 in vivo binding. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq), we identified TR4 binding sites in 4 different human cell types and found that the majority of target genes were shared among different cells. TR4 target genes are involved in fundamental biological processes such as RNA metabolism and protein translation. In addition, we found that a subset of TR4 target genes exerts cell-type specific functions. Analysis of the TR4 binding sites revealed that less than 30% of the peaks from any of the cell types contained the DR1 motif previously derived from in vitro studies, suggesting that TR4 may be recruited to the genome via interaction with other proteins. A bioinformatics analysis of the TR4 binding sites predicted a cis regulatory module involving TR4 and ETS transcription factors. To test this prediction, we performed ChIP-seq for the ETS factor ELK4 and found that 30% of TR4 binding sites were also bound by ELK4.
    [Show full text]
  • Mouse Taf1a Conditional Knockout Project (CRISPR/Cas9)
    https://www.alphaknockout.com Mouse Taf1a Conditional Knockout Project (CRISPR/Cas9) Objective: To create a Taf1a conditional knockout Mouse model (C57BL/6J) by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Strategy summary: The Taf1a gene (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_021466 ; Ensembl: ENSMUSG00000072258 ) is located on Mouse chromosome 1. 13 exons are identified, with the ATG start codon in exon 2 and the TAG stop codon in exon 13 (Transcript: ENSMUST00000097043). Exon 2 will be selected as conditional knockout region (cKO region). Deletion of this region should result in the loss of function of the Mouse Taf1a gene. To engineer the targeting vector, homologous arms and cKO region will be generated by PCR using BAC clone RP24-281F5 as template. Cas9, gRNA and targeting vector will be co-injected into fertilized eggs for cKO Mouse production. The pups will be genotyped by PCR followed by sequencing analysis. Note: Exon 2 starts from about 100% of the coding region. The knockout of Exon 2 will result in frameshift of the gene. The size of intron 1 for 5'-loxP site insertion: 1830 bp, and the size of intron 2 for 3'-loxP site insertion: 4865 bp. The size of effective cKO region: ~624 bp. The cKO region does not have any other known gene. Page 1 of 7 https://www.alphaknockout.com Overview of the Targeting Strategy Wildtype allele gRNA region 5' gRNA region 3' 1 2 13 Targeting vector Targeted allele Constitutive KO allele (After Cre recombination) Legends Homology arm Exon of mouse Taf1a cKO region loxP site Page 2 of 7 https://www.alphaknockout.com Overview of the Dot Plot Window size: 10 bp Forward Reverse Complement Sequence 12 Note: The sequence of homologous arms and cKO region is aligned with itself to determine if there are tandem repeats.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) A protein prioritization approach tailored for the FA/BRCA pathway Haitjema, A.; Brandt, B.W.; Ameziane, N.; May, P.; Heringa, J.; de Winter, J.P.; Joenje, H.; Dorsman, J.C. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0062017 Publication date 2013 Document Version Final published version Published in PLoS ONE Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Haitjema, A., Brandt, B. W., Ameziane, N., May, P., Heringa, J., de Winter, J. P., Joenje, H., & Dorsman, J. C. (2013). A protein prioritization approach tailored for the FA/BRCA pathway. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e62017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062017 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:28 Sep 2021 A Protein Prioritization Approach Tailored for the FA/ BRCA Pathway Anneke Haitjema1., Bernd W.
    [Show full text]
  • A CRISPR Screen to Identify Combination Therapies of Cytotoxic
    CRISPRi Screens to Identify Combination Therapies for the Improved Treatment of Ovarian Cancer By Erika Daphne Handly B.S. Chemical Engineering Brigham Young University, 2014 Submitted to the Department of Biological Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2021 © 2020 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of author………………………………………………………………………………… Erika Handly Department of Biological Engineering February 2021 Certified by………………………………………………………………………………………… Michael Yaffe Director MIT Center for Precision Cancer Medicine Department of Biological Engineering and Biology Thesis Supervisor Accepted by………………………………………………………………………………………... Katharina Ribbeck Professor of Biological Engineering Chair of Graduate Program, Department of Biological Engineering Thesis Committee members Michael T. Hemann, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Biology Massachusetts Institute of Technology Douglas A. Lauffenburger, Ph.D. (Chair) Ford Professor of Biological Engineering, Chemical Engineering, and Biology Massachusetts Institute of Technology Michael B. Yaffe, M.D., Ph.D. (Thesis Supervisor) David H. Koch Professor of Science Prof. of Biology and Biological Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2 CRISPRi Screens to Identify Combination Therapies for the Improved Treatment of Ovarian Cancer By Erika Daphne Handly B.S. Chemical Engineering Brigham Young University, 2014 Submitted to the Department of Biological Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Engineering ABSTRACT Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer death for women in the United States, with only modest improvements in patient survival in the past few decades. Standard-of-care consists of surgical debulking followed by a combination of platinum and taxane agents, but relapse and resistance frequently occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Expression Profiling of Corpus Luteum Reveals Important
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Gene Expression Profiling of Corpus luteum Reveals Important Insights about Early Pregnancy in Domestic Sheep Kisun Pokharel 1 , Jaana Peippo 2, Melak Weldenegodguad 1 , Mervi Honkatukia 3, Meng-Hua Li 4,* and Juha Kantanen 2,* 1 Natural Resources, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), 31600 Jokioinen, Finland; kisun.pokharel@luke.fi (K.P.); melak.weldenegodguad@luke.fi (M.W.) 2 Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), 31600 Jokioinen, Finland; jaana.peippo@luke.fi 3 NordGen—The Nordic Genetic Resources Center, 1432 Ås, Norway; [email protected] 4 College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.-H.L.); juha.kantanen@luke.fi (J.K.); Tel.: +358-295-326-210 (J.K.) Received: 2 March 2020; Accepted: 8 April 2020; Published: 10 April 2020 Abstract: The majority of pregnancy loss in ruminants occurs during the preimplantation stage, which is thus the most critical period determining reproductive success. Here, we performed a comparative transcriptome study by sequencing total mRNA from corpus luteum (CL) collected during the preimplantation stage of pregnancy in Finnsheep, Texel and F1 crosses. A total of 21,287 genes were expressed in our data. Highly expressed autosomal genes in the CL were associated with biological processes such as progesterone formation (STAR, CYP11A1, and HSD3B1) and embryo implantation (e.g., TIMP1, TIMP2 and TCTP). Among the list of differentially expressed genes, sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin (Ig)-like lectins (SIGLEC3, SIGLEC14, SIGLEC8), ribosomal proteins (RPL17, RPL34, RPS3A, MRPS33) and chemokines (CCL5, CCL24, CXCL13, CXCL9) were upregulated in Finnsheep, while four multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRPs) were upregulated in Texel ewes.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Expression Profiling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Upregulation of Genes in Amplified Chromosome Regions
    Modern Pathology (2008) 21, 505–516 & 2008 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0893-3952/08 $30.00 www.modernpathology.org Gene expression profiling in hepatocellular carcinoma: upregulation of genes in amplified chromosome regions Britta Skawran1, Doris Steinemann1, Anja Weigmann1, Peer Flemming2, Thomas Becker3, Jakobus Flik4, Hans Kreipe2, Brigitte Schlegelberger1 and Ludwig Wilkens1,2 1Institute of Cell and Molecular Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; 2Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; 3Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany and 4Institute of Virology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany Cytogenetics of hepatocellular carcinoma and adenoma have revealed gains of chromosome 1q as a significant differentiating factor. However, no studies are available comparing these amplification events with gene expression. Therefore, gene expression profiling was performed on tumours cytogenetically well characterized by array-based comparative genomic hybridisation. For this approach analysis was carried out on 24 hepatocellular carcinoma and 8 hepatocellular adenoma cytogenetically characterised by array-based comparative genomic hybridisation. Expression profiles of mRNA were determined using a genome-wide microarray containing 43 000 spots. Hierarchical clustering analysis branched all hepatocellular adenoma from hepatocellular carcinoma. Significance analysis of microarray demonstrated 722 dysregulated genes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Gene set enrichment analysis detected groups of upregulated genes located in chromosome bands 1q22–42 seen also as the most frequently gained regions by comparative genomic hybridisation. Comparison of significance analysis of microarray and gene set enrichment analysis narrowed down the number of dysregulated genes to 18, with 7 genes localised on 1q22 (SCAMP3, IQGAP3, PYGO2, GPATC4, ASH1L, APOA1BP, and CCT3). In hepatocellular adenoma 26 genes in bands 11p15, 11q12, and 12p13 were upregulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Roles of UBF and RRN3 in the Transcription of the Ribosomal RNA Genes and Ribosome Biogenesis Determined Using in Vivo Mouse Models
    Relative roles of UBF and RRN3 in the transcription of the ribosomal RNA genes and ribosome biogenesis determined using in vivo mouse models Thèse Chelsea Herdman Doctorat en biologie cellulaire et moléculaire Philosophiae doctor (Ph.D.) Québec, Canada © Chelsea Herdman, 2017 Relative roles of UBF and RRN3 in the transcription of the ribosomal RNA genes and ribosome biogenesis determined using in vivo mouse models Thèse Chelsea Herdman Sous la direction de : Tom Moss, directeur de recherche Résumé La biogenèse des ribosomes, aussi appelée la synthèse ribosomale, est un processus cellulaire important se déroulant dans le nucléole et implique la transcription par les trois ARN polymérases nucléaires. L’étape initiale et limitante de ce processus est la transcription des ARNs ribosomaux catalytiques, 28S, 18S and 5.8S, sous la forme d’un long précurseur d’ARN ribosomal (pre-ARNr/47S) par l’ARN polymérase I (RPI). RPI possède un ensemble de facteurs de transcription généraux responsables de son activation. Ces facteurs sont la protéine architecturale UBF, le facteur SL1 qui contient TBP, le facteur d’initiation RRN3 et le facteur de terminaison TTF1. La synthèse de l’ARN ribosomale est finement régulée et correspond à 30-50% de l’ensemble de la transcription de la cellule. De plus, ce processus est lié à la croissance cellulaire, la transformation, la prolifération et à l’activité des facteurs suppresseurs de tumeurs et des oncogènes. UBF et RRN3 sont notamment activés par plusieurs voies de signalisation de croissance cellulaire. Dans les cellules de mammifère, il existe ~200 copies d’ADNr par génome haploïde. Les fragments répétés d’ADN ribosomal sont arrangés en répétition en tandem sur les bras courts des chromosomes acrocentriques.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Whole Genome Sequence
    Demeure et al. Genome Medicine 2012, 4:56 http://genomemedicine.com/content/4/7/56 RESEARCH Open Access Cancer of the ampulla of Vater: analysis of the whole genome sequence exposes a potential therapeutic vulnerability Michael J Demeure1,2*, David W Craig3, Shripad Sinari3, Tracy M Moses1, Alexis Christoforides3, Jennifer Dinh1, Tyler Izatt3, Jessica Aldrich3, Ardis Decker4, Angela Baker1, Irene Cherni1, April Watanabe1, Lawrence Koep5, Douglas Lake6, Galen Hostetter1, Jeffrey M Trent1, Daniel D Von Hoff2,4 and John D Carpten1 Abstract Background: Recent advances in the treatment of cancer have focused on targeting genomic aberrations with selective therapeutic agents. In rare tumors, where large-scale clinical trials are daunting, this targeted genomic approach offers a new perspective and hope for improved treatments. Cancers of the ampulla of Vater are rare tumors that comprise only about 0.2% of gastrointestinal cancers. Consequently, they are often treated as either distal common bile duct or pancreatic cancers. Methods: We analyzed DNA from a resected cancer of the ampulla of Vater and whole blood DNA from a 63 year-old man who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy by whole genome sequencing, achieving 37× and 40× coverage, respectively. We determined somatic mutations and structural alterations. Results: We identified relevant aberrations, including deleterious mutations of KRAS and SMAD4 as well as a homozygous focal deletion of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene. These findings suggest that these tumors have a distinct oncogenesis from either common bile duct cancer or pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, this combination of genomic aberrations suggests a therapeutic context for dual mTOR/PI3K inhibition. Conclusions: Whole genome sequencing can elucidate an oncogenic context and expose potential therapeutic vulnerabilities in rare cancers.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression Profiling of Human Genetic and Protein Interaction Networks in Type 1 Diabetes
    Expression Profiling of Human Genetic and Protein Interaction Networks in Type 1 Diabetes Regine Bergholdt1*, Caroline Brorsson1, Kasper Lage2,3,4, Jens Høiriis Nielsen5, Søren Brunak2, Flemming Pociot1,6,7 1 Hagedorn Research Institute and Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark, 2 Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 3 Pediatric Surgical Research Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, 4 Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Seven Cambridge Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, 5 Department of Medical Biochemistry and Genetics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6 University of Lund/Clinical Research Centre (CRC), Malmø, Sweden, 7 Department of Biomedical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract Proteins contributing to a complex disease are often members of the same functional pathways. Elucidation of such pathways may provide increased knowledge about functional mechanisms underlying disease. By combining genetic interactions in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) with protein interaction data we have previously identified sets of genes, likely to represent distinct cellular pathways involved in T1D risk. Here we evaluate the candidate genes involved in these putative interaction networks not only at the single gene level, but also in the context of the networks of which they form an integral part. mRNA expression levels for each gene were evaluated and profiling was performed by measuring and comparing constitutive expression in human islets versus cytokine-stimulated expression levels, and for lymphocytes by comparing expression levels among controls and T1D individuals. We identified differential regulation of several genes. In one of the networks four out of nine genes showed significant down regulation in human pancreatic islets after cytokine exposure supporting our prediction that the interaction network as a whole is a risk factor.
    [Show full text]