Mr Speaker (The Hon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mr Speaker (The Hon LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 17th November, 1993 ______ Mr Speaker (The Hon. Kevin Richard Rozzoli) took the chair at 2.15 p.m. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. DEPARTMENT OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Report Mr Speaker laid upon the table the report of the Department of the Legislative Assembly for the year ended 1993. Ordered to be printed. MATTER OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE Mr Speaker advised the House that he had received from the honourable member for Riverstone notice of a matter of public importance, which would be set down for debate at the conclusion of formal business. MINISTRY Mr FAHEY: I wish to inform the House that in the absence of the Minister for Industrial Relations and Employment and Minister for the Status of Women I will answer questions that may be directed to her portfolio. QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE ______ POLICE ADMINISTRATION Mr CARR: My question without notice is directed to the Premier. Have changes to police administration finally been forced on the Government by the Hon. Ted Pickering? Do the changes represent a vote of no confidence in the present Minister for Police? Mr FAHEY: The answers in brief are no and no. However, I take this opportunity to advise honourable members that in the past five and a half years this Government has undertaken enormous reform within the Police Service. A great deal of that reform was initiated by the former Minister for Police. Honourable members who recognise a fair thing would acknowledge that the matters brought forward in recent times by the Hon. Ted Pickering were brought forward out of one concern, and one concern only, which was to establish a better Police Service in this State and one in which the public had complete confidence. The former Minister undertook considerable work in that direction, and I am pleased that that work is being continued by the present Minister. In the past 14 months the Minister has established a number of initiatives which have improved the Police Service. The bottom line is this: the Government is interested in having a better Police Service tomorrow than we have today, which is considerably better than the Police Service we had yesterday. Mr SPEAKER: Order! I call the honourable member for Coogee to order. POLICE PROTECTION OF PAEDOPHILES Mrs GRUSOVIN: My question without notice is directed to the Minister for Police and Minister for Emergency Services. Was Colin Fisk, the paedophile to whom the Government granted indemnity, last Sunday suspended from the witness protection program? Was this because he spoke to "A Current Affair" about police corruption and paedophile networks? Why was the safety of this witness jeopardised? Mr GRIFFITHS: Some matters need to be made very clear. As I said yesterday, I find any form of child abuse or police corruption totally abhorrent. Child abuse is the lowest form of human depravity. Mr SPEAKER: Order! I call the honourable member for Granville to order. Mr GRIFFITHS: Let there be no mistake about that. I make it very clear that the Government will never move away from its obligation to protect the young and innocent in our society. If the honourable member, or any other member in this House, has evidence of paedophilia that the police are not aware of - and I mean evidence - let the chatter in this House stop, let the evidence be laid on the table, and the police will deal with it appropriately. Later, Mr GRIFFITHS: Earlier the honourable member for Heffron asked me a question. I am advised that the person named by the honourable member has not been discharged from the witness protection program. However, a review of his status within the program is under way. That review is based on his allegedly breaching the clear terms upon which he was put under police protection. I am further advised that this matter will be assessed in the immediate future. It seems that three options are now available. First, he may be discharged from the program; second, he can continue under the current arrangements; and third, those arrangements may be altered. Again the honourable member for Heffron has it wrong, wrong, wrong. POLICE ADMINISTRATION REFORMS Mr KERR: I address my question without notice to the Minister for Police and Minister for Emergency Services. What is the state of the police administration reforms which were announced in April this year? Will the Minister advise the House? Page 5550 Mr GRIFFITHS: The Government's approach to its policing program is to be open about problems and press continually for improvement. Mr SPEAKER: Order! I call the honourable member for Hurstville to order. Mr GRIFFITHS: Those problems requiring immediate attention are being dealt with in a planned, methodical and effective way. Let there be no mistake about that. In answer to the question of the honourable member, I am pleased now to announce details of the fifth stage of the reform program now under way in the police portfolio. I have informed the House previously about the first four stages of the extensive reform and review program already undertaken. Some of those changes have required legislation which received bipartisan support in the Parliament. I am delighted to be able to inform the honourable member that the program of reform is continuing. Its fifth stage will pick up a number of issues raised before the Joint Select Committee upon Police Administration, and elsewhere. Following recent Cabinet discussion, it was decided that the justice committee would examine and report to Cabinet on a number of issues. The first of those matters involves the relationship between the Minister and the Commissioner of Police. The joint select committee examined this issue extensively and, among other things, expressed a strong view on the capacity of the Minister to direct the commissioner on operational matters. Mr SPEAKER: Order! I call the honourable member for Londonderry to order. Mr GRIFFITHS: The committee also examined other aspects of this most significant relationship in light of the difficulties that occurred prior to my appointment to this portfolio. The justice committee will examine the way in which those past difficulties have been addressed, as well as any other issues related to the Government's primary objective of ensuring accountability of the Police Service, through the Minister, to the Parliament. If there is any shadow of doubt, that will most certainly be removed. The justice committee will examine whether the internal affairs branch of the Police Service is able to operate effectively within the present structure. This branch bears the onerous and critically important responsibility of investigation of complaints against police officers. This branch undertakes the most important investigations, including most of the significant allegations of corruption. There have been suggestions that this unit, or the responsibilities given to it, should be placed outside the Police Service. Models exist in other jurisdictions which differ from the arrangements that prevail in New South Wales. The Police Association and the commissioner have for years been pushing for this method to come to fruition. I am sure that the previous Minister and previous Labor Government are fully aware of the association's comments. The justice committee will pay particular attention to the need for an independent police complaints authority, which would be completely separate from the Police Service and would have its own investigative resources. Independent examination of complaints against police by an authority of this kind - particularly those alleging corruption - may be the only way of satisfying the community's concern for a process free from perceived conflicts of interest. New South Wales has other bodies whose role in this area could be expanded - for example, the Crime Commission. The need for additional scrutiny of internal affairs investigations and functions will also be examined in detail. Matters dealt with by internal affairs are all notified to the Ombudsman, who oversights investigations and, as a result of amendments introduced by the Government in the last session of Parliament, can even take them over should he deem it appropriate. The Independent Commission Against Corruption is also informed of most internal affairs investigations because the initial allegations usually fall within the definition of corrupt conduct under the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act. Consideration will be given by the justice committee to formalising extensive formal and informal interaction on these matters between the Police Service, the ICAC, the Ombudsman and the Crime Commission. This might be achieved through the establishment of a permanent monitoring committee or some other means. The justice committee will examine these various alternatives and report its conclusions to the Cabinet. Other matters are also to be attended to. The third report of the joint select committee emphasised problems arising from the Police Service having to maintain custody of seized, illegal drugs. A committee has been established by the Attorney General to examine and report on how security of drugs in police custody might be improved. The Attorney General has ministerial responsibility for the Drugs (Misuse and Trafficking) Act and it is likely that changes to that Act will be recommended. The committee will be chaired by the Hon. Adrian Roden, Q.C., a former justice of the Supreme Court who has also served as an assistant commissioner with the ICAC. This committee was established following an approach by me on 3rd September to the Attorney General seeking a review of the law relating to the destruction of drugs. The Government's aims are to ensure absolute security in and accountability for the handling of seized, illegal substances from the time of seizure to the time of destruction; to provide sufficient methods of analysis and sampling of seized exhibits to ensure adequate evidence is available for the purposes of criminal proceedings; to afford a reasonable opportunity, where practicable, for any person charged or likely to be charged in connection with the seized substances to obtain an independent analysis; and, subject to the foregoing, to permit the destruction of seized, illegal substances at the earliest possible time.
Recommended publications
  • Legislative Council
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ORAL HISTORY PROJECT LC Members Ante-Room, Parliament House, Sydney Wednesday 12 September 2018 The discussion commenced at 10:00 am PRESENT Mr David Blunt Dr David Clune Mr Richard Jones Wednesday, 12 September 2018 Legislative Council Page 1 Dr CLUNE: How did you become a member of the Legislative Council? Mr JONES: I got involved in politics back in 1971-72 when I was trying to stop the destruction of Myall Lakes, which is now a national park. I wrote back and forth to Premier Robin Askin, as he was then. He said, "Well, you may know about publishing, Mr Jones, but you know nothing about politics", which was like a red rag to a bull. So I abandoned my career and that new trail led me to standing for the Legislative Council in 1988. I gave up an extremely highly paid job back in 1972 to campaign for the environment. I was at the top of my earning capacity. I was general manager of Hamlyn House. I had a property portfolio I was building up as well. Anyway, I gave all that up. I was approached by Armon Hicks, who was Lis Kirkby's offsider, to stand for the upper House back in 1984. He said, "Would you like to be an MLC?" I said, "I would rather be a senator actually", just jokingly. He said, "If you want to be an MLC follow this path. First of all you have to stand for the lower House. You have to stand in the next election"—which was 1984—"for Warringah", where I got about six per cent.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Speaker (The Hon
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 27th October, 1993 ______ Mr Speaker (The Hon. Kevin Richard Rozzoli) took the chair at 2.15 p.m. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. OMBUDSMAN'S REPORT Mr Speaker laid upon the table a copy of the report of the Ombudsman for the year ended 30th June, 1993. Ordered to be printed. QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE ______ FORMER MINISTER FOR POLICE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES ALLEGATIONS Mr CARR: I direct my question to the Premier. As the Minister for Police said this morning that there were only two new allegations made by the Hon. Ted Pickering yesterday, why will it take 72 hours for the Government to be briefed? Will the Premier table on 9th November written responses to all the Pickering allegations to enable them to be debated before Parliament adjourns? Mr FAHEY: It should be pointed out to all honourable members that the matters relating to the Hon. Ted Pickering are still the subject of debate in another place. That debate has not been concluded. All honourable members should be willing to accept that a committee of this Parliament has dealt with this matter. That committee consisted of members of the Government and the Opposition, and included members from the crossbenches. They have extensively examined many of the matters that were the subject of an address by the Hon. Ted Pickering in another place yesterday. I believe we have to have some confidence in a committee that has spent time listening to an extensive amount of evidence. I, the Leader of the Opposition and most members of this House, in fact all who were not members of the committee, are not privy to evidence which was given in camera.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council
    3742 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Wednesday 26 June 2002 ______ The President (The Hon. Dr Meredith Burgmann) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. The President offered the Prayers. AUDIT OFFICE The President, tabled, pursuant to the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983, a performance audit report entitled "e-Government User-friendliness of Websites", dated June 2002. Ordered to be printed. BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE Precedence of Business Motion by the Hon. John Della Bosca agreed to: That on Thursday 27 June 2002 Government Business take precedence of General Business. M5 EAST MOTORWAY Motion by the Hon. Richard Jones agreed to: 1. That, under Standing Order 18, there be laid on the table of the House by 5.00 p.m. on Thursday 27 June 2002 and made public without restricted access: (a) any document created since 28 March 2001, and not previously provided to the House, in the possession, custody or power of the Cabinet Office, the Roads and Traffic Authority (referred to as RTA), the Premier's Department, the Department of Urban Affairs and Planning (referred to as DUAP), the Environment Protection Authority (referred to as EPA) and the Department of Health, including related ministerial offices, relating to: (i) the M5 East tunnel ventilation or ventilation in existing and proposed road tunnels, (ii) air quality data from local monitoring stations established at Turrella, Earlwood, Bardwell Valley and Undercliffe, and any comparative analysis with other Sydney monitoring stations for the same period, not already publicly available on the RTA web site, (iii) predicted
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Webster
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ORAL HISTORY PROJECT LC Members Ante-Room, Parliament House, Sydney Monday, 16 July 2018 The discussion commenced at 11.10 a.m. Present Mr David Blunt Dr David Clune Mr Robert Webster Monday, 16 July 2018 Legislative Council Page 1 Dr CLUNE: How did you become a member of Parliament? Mr WEBSTER: I became a farmer by accident. I was supposed to be a lawyer but being an only child of relatively elderly parents I started doing law at Sydney University in 1970 and not long after my father had a stroke. We only had a small farm with no farm hands and basically my dad said, "I can't pay someone to run the farm and keep you at university at the same time so you will have to come home and look after things until I get better." So I went back to the farm but he did not get better. I ended up doing a wool classing certificate instead of a law degree. But I was always interested in the law, in history and in English—which was my main subject at school—and it did not take long before I got interested in politics. The Whitlam Government was elected and did a lot of things which people in the country did not like so as a consequence I joined the then Country Party. I was elected to my first position, which was a director of the Carcoar Pastures Protection Board, in the early 1970s and I enjoyed it. My dad died when I was 21 so I took over full responsibility for the farm and my mother.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressing Towards Conservatism
    Progressing Towards Conservatism A Gramscian Challenge to the Conceptualisation of Class, Agency, Corruption and Reform in ‘Progressive’ Analyses of Policing by Michael Hartley Kennedy A thesis presented to the University of Western Sydney in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2004 © M H Kennedy 2004 Acknowledgements Thank you to my friend and academic supervisor Dr Elizabeth Watson. Also many thanks to comrades Lorraine Murphy, Dr Kelvin McQueen and my colleagues Dr Abbas Brashi, Dr Ru Ying and Jianle (Frank) Ni from Nantong Medical College. It is very important to me that I pay a special tribute to some departed friends who contributed enormously to my work. My dear friend Joan Locke a lawyer who I first met as a detective under cross-examination died in 2003. Another good and kind friend Robert Lowe died in December 2003. My Colleague Captaine Pierre-Yves Le Bivic from the Brigade de Protection des Mineurs in Paris died in March 2004. He insisted that Paris was the seat of all revolutions, a considerable concession for a Breton. Lastly Tony Brizzi a friend from the other side of the fence, so to speak. A serious gangster and a man of his word who died on 28th October 2004. I also thank the Monjo’s, Steve and Kris, Paul and Enza, Vaughan Bowie, Dr Griff Spragg, and Comrade Rod Settle. My old colleagues Det Sgt Kristina O’Hagen, Det Ch Insp Nick Bingham, Det Sgt Garry Heskett and Det Ch Insp Adrian Allingham who are both retired. A special mention to mon ami et collègue Patrick Yvars his wife Agnes and Captaine Philippe Mora et Qui est avec la force de police de Judiciare à Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • First Speech.Gay.Pdf
    Legislative Council 23/08/88 GOVERNOR’S SPEECH: ADDRESS IN REPLY Third Day’s Debate Extract The Hon. D. J. GAY [3.34]: In reply to the Speech made by His Excellency, Sir James Anthony Rowland, and to the Address in Reply moved by the Hon. Max Willis and seconded by the Hon. John Jobling, may I first say how honoured I am to be elected to this great House. I am sure that, like many other honourable members, as a child I dreamed how simple it would be to make the world a better place. How easy it seemed then, and how much harder it is now that we are in a position to facilitate change. Yet I am sure that, along with all honourable members, I share this common challenge. We may travel on different paths, but our ultimate destination is to better the lot of the people of this State. We are helped in this challenge by the feeling of history and dignity which those who have preceded us have bestowed on this Parliament. The challenge of the future has seen many changes to this House in recent years. I am sure we will see many more as we head towards the year 2000. My congratulations to the Hon. John Johnson on his re-election as President. In my limited time in this place I have come to know why he retains the respect of honourable members on both sides of this Chamber. My congratulations also to the Hon. Sir Adrian Solomons on his selection as Chairman of Committees and on the role he fulfils in this place as father of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Corruption, Accountability and the Media: a Study of Motives and Justifications
    Political corruption, accountability and the media: A study of motives and justifications by Stephen John Tanner B.A., M.A. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania June 1999 This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any tertiary institution and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. Stephen J. Tanner Authority of Access !his thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying m accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 . Stephen Tanner June 4, 1999. Abstract Political corruption, accountability and the media: a study oi motives and justifications This thesis is about political corruption. Specifically it is concerned with two issues: (1) the way in which people alleged to have committed a corrupt act seek to justify their actions; and (2) how the media report the process of allegation and justification which invariably occurs when such an issue becomes public. In short the thesis is about accountability processes as they apply in Australia to elected public officials, particularly political leaders. The thesis uses a single case study - the so-called Metherell affair in New South Wales - to argue that public figures will invariably struggle to justify conduct which has been labelled corrupt. The Metherell affair represents an important case study because it illustrates how behaviour can be variously interpreted by different groups and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming NSW Criminal Investigation Law
    Powers and Responsibilities: Reforming NSW Criminal Investigation Law Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales Karl Alderson 10 December 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 3 ABBREVIATIONS 6 1. INTRODUCTION 7 2. THE FREE BRITISH WAY 32 3. THE IDEA OF REFORM 88 4. THE REALITY OF RESISTANCE 155 5. DRUG WAR 192 6. VERBALS 253 7. PUSHING POWERS 285 8. SEEKING SAFEGUARDS 331 9. INSIDE THE STATE 387 FULL ABSTRACT 404 BIBLIOGRAPHY 420 2 Acknowledgments I wish to express my appreciation to those whose insight and assistance made the completion of this thesis possible. During the period I have worked on this thesis, I have been an employee of the Criminal Justice Branch (later Criminal Law Branch) of the Commonwealth Attorney-General’s Department. My supervisors have allowed me several periods of extended leave, and my colleagues have carried a considerable burden of additional work in covering for my absences. The professionalism, enthusiasm, thoughtfulness and intelligence of these colleagues has been a constant source of inspiration and insight. They have given me an incredible opportunity to work at the heart of federal criminal justice policy for the better part of a decade, and I have learned a lot from all of them. Among those to whom my thanks are due are Sarah Chidgey, Geoff Dabb, Andrew Egan, Maggie Jackson, Laurel Johnson, Geoff McDonald, Ricky Nolan, Suesan Sellick, Geoff Skillen and Anastasia Tearne. I should add that neither these officers, nor anyone else in the Attorney-General’s Department, saw or vetted any part of this thesis prior to submission, and nor did I discuss the specific content with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions in Australian Electoral Reform
    Directions in Australian Electoral Reform Professionalism and Partisanship in Electoral Management Directions in Australian Electoral Reform Professionalism and Partisanship in Electoral Management Norm Kelly Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Kelly, Norm Title: Directions in Australian electoral reform : professionalism and partisanship in electoral management / Norm Kelly. ISBN: 9781921862878 (pbk.) 9781921862885 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Elections--Australia--History. Election law--Australia--History. Law reform--Australia--History. Voting--Australia--History. Representative government and representation--Australia--History. Australia--Politics and government. Dewey Number: 324.60994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press Contents Abbreviations . vii 1 . Introduction . 1 2 . Australia’s Electoral Administration . 9 3 . The Independence of Australian Electoral Commissions . 27 4 . The Franchise . 51 5 . Enrolment, Turnout and Informal Voting . 61 6 . Registration of Political Parties . 83 7 . Political
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissident Liberal
    A DISSIDENT LIBERAL THE POLITICAL WRITINGS OF PETER BAUME PETER BAUME Edited by John Wanna and Marija Taflaga A DISSIDENT LIBERAL THE POLITICAL WRITINGS OF PETER BAUME Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: Baume, Peter, 1935– author. Title: A dissident liberal : the political writings of Peter Baume / Peter Baume ; edited by Marija Taflaga, John Wanna. ISBN: 9781925022544 (paperback) 9781925022551 (ebook) Subjects: Liberal Party of Australia. Politicians--Australia--Biography. Australia--Politics and government--1972–1975. Australia--Politics and government--1976–1990. Other Creators/Contributors: Taflaga, Marija, editor. Wanna, John, editor. Dewey Number: 324.294 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2015 ANU Press CONTENTS Foreword . vii Introduction: A Dissident Liberal—A Principled Political Career . xiii 1 . My Dilemma: From Medicine to the Senate . 1 2 . Autumn 1975 . 17 3 . Moving Towards Crisis: The Bleak Winter of 1975 . 25 4 . Budget 1975 . 37 5 . Prelude to Crisis . 43 6 . The Crisis Deepens: October 1975 . 49 7 . Early November 1975 . 63 8 . Remembrance Day . 71 9 . The Election Campaign . 79 10 . Looking Back at the Dismissal . 91 SPEECHES & OTHER PRESENTATIONS Part 1: Personal Philosophies Liberal Beliefs and Civil Liberties (1986) .
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Format, Here
    THE DEMOCRACY PRINCI P LE FARMER CO-O P ERA T IVES IN TWEN T IE T H CEN T URY AUS T RALIA GARY LEWIS THE DEMOCRACY PRINCI P LE FARMER CO-O P ERA T IVES IN TWEN T IE T H CEN T URY AUS T RALIA | I | Hugh Kirland’s property near Booyong just outside of Lismore. Getting ready for milking (early 1900s) Photo courtesy of Norco Co-operative Limited. | II | THE DEMOCRACY PRINCI P LE FARMER CO-O P ERA T IVES IN TWEN T IE T H CEN T URY AUS T RALIA Gary Lewis | III | The Democracy Principle: Farmer Co-operatives in Twentieth Century Australia is published by the author, Gary Lewis of Wamboin, NSW, under the auspices of the Co-operative Federation of NSW Ltd. Funding for printing was provided by the New South Wales Registry of Co-operatives and Associations Co-operatives Development Grants Program. Text copyright © Gary Lewis 2006 The moral right of the author has been asserted. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the copyright owner, who is the above publisher of this book. ISBN 0-646-46587-2 Cover and book design by The Magic Lantern Company, Melbourne Typeset by The Magic Lantern Company, Melbourne Printed by BPA Print Group, Melbourne | IV | FOR CA T HY | V | Contents THE DEMOCRACY PRINCI P LE FARMER CO-O P ERA T IVES IN TWEN T IE T H CEN T URY AUS T RALIA Acknowledgements
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    21 February, 1991 ASSEMBLY 65 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Thursday, 21 February, 1991 Mr Speaker (The Hon. Kevin Richard Rozzoli) took the chair at 10.30 a.m. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. PHOTOGRAPH OF LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Mr Speaker announced that photographs of the sitting would be taken for display by the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly and to allow individual members the opportunity to gain a record of this Parliament. SENATE VACANCY Resignation of Senator the Honourable Peter Baume Motion by Mr Greiner agreed to: That this House meet the Legislative Council for the purpose of sitting and voting together to choose a person to hold the place in the Senate rendered vacant by the resignation of Senator the Hon. Peter Baume. Message Motion by Mr Greiner agreed to: That the following message be sent to the Legislative Council: Mr President. the Leeislative" Assemblv having" resolved to meet the Leeislative- Council for the purpose of sitting and voting together to choosea person to hold the placein thesenaterendered vacant by the resignation of Senator the Hon. Peter Baume requests the Legislative Council to name the place and hour for such meeting. SESSIONAL ORDERS Motion, by leave, by Mr Dowd, agreed to: That the sessional orders in identical terms to those adopted by this House on 17 August, 1988, and 22 February, 1990, be adopted in relation to the following subjects: Introduction of Public Bills Divisions and Quorums Private Members' Statements Days and Hours of Sitting Adjournment of the House Notice of Motions Time Limit of Speeches Personal Explanation-Debates of same session not to be alluded to Alternative Form of Amendment Divisions-Recording of Pairs Cognate Bills New Clauses and Schedules Preparation of Bills for Assent Suspension of Standing Orders 66 ASSEMBLY 21 February, 1991 LEAVE OF ABSENCE Motion by Mr Phillips agreed to: That leave of absence for the present session be granted to John David Booth, member for Wakehulst, on account of absence from the State.
    [Show full text]