DOCSLIB.ORG

OVER OUR DEAD BODIES Port Arthur and Australia’S Fight for Gun Control

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OVER OUR DEAD BODIES Port Arthur and Australia’S Fight for Gun Control OVER OUR DEAD BODIES Port Arthur and Australia’s fight for gun control Simon Chapman Originally published 1998 by Pluto Press (Annandale, Australia) This reprint edition published 2013 by SYDNEY UNIVERSITY PRESS © Simon Chapman 1998, 2013 © Sydney University Press 2013 Reproduction and Communication for other purposes Except as permitted under the Act, no part of this edition may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or communicated in any form or by any means without prior written permission. All requests for reproduction or communication should be made to Sydney University Press at the address below: Sydney University Press Fisher Library F03 University of Sydney NSW 2006 AUSTRALIA Email: [email protected] ISBN 978-1-74332-031-0 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data available Cover design by Dushan Mrva-Montoya Contents Foreword to the reprint edition 5 Preface and acknowledgments to the 1998 edition 9 Introduction 15 1. The massacre 31 2. The case for fewer guns 73 3. The campaign for gun control 99 4. The main reforms 117 5. The gun lobby in Australia 153 6. The gun lobby’s arguments . and the responses 197 7. The future tasks for gun control 251 Other books by Simon Chapman 275 3 Foreword to the reprint edition The firearm massacre at a primary school in Sandy Hook, Connecticut on 14 December 2012 in which a lone gunman armed with three semi- automatic firearms killed 20 children, six teachers, his gun-owning mother and then himself, has stimulated unprecedented momentum for meaningful gun controls in the US. In 2006, with colleagues, I published a report1 that examined what had happened to gun deaths in Australia since the implementation of comprehensive gun law reforms in Australia, following the Port Arthur massacre in April 1996, where 35 people were killed by a single gunman. On the day of the US massacre, I tweeted a link to that report, published in the British Medical Journal’s specialist journal Injury Prevention. In the six years since our paper had been published, it had been opened online 14,742 times. In the month of December 2012, it was opened a remarkable 84,542 times, quite easily the most opened paper I have ever published on any subject in 35 years of public health research. Americans might value reflection on Australia’s recent experience in reducing deaths from firearms. The US has 13.7 times Australia’s 1 Chapman S, Alpers P, Agho K, Jones M. Australia’s 1996 gun law reforms: faster falls in firearm deaths, firearm suicides, and a decade without mass shootings. Injury Prevention 2006, 12: 365–72. Available at: http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/12/6/365. full?sid=4d930b0a-0f5d-484a-8ad4-b5839c7d10c5. 5 Over our dead bodies population, 104 times its total firearm-caused deaths (32,163 in 2011 vs 236 in 2010), and 370 times Australia’s firearm homicide rate (11,101 in 2011 vs 30 in 2010). Importantly, in the 16 years since the law reforms, there have been no mass shootings. While the rate of firearm homicide was reducing by an average of 3% per year prior to the law reforms, this increased to 7.5% per year after the introduction of the new laws, although this failed to reach statistical significance because of the low power inherent in the small numbers involved. Our report showed that firearm-related suicides in males declined from 3.4 deaths per 100,000 person-years in 1997 to 1.3 per 100,000 person-years, representing a decline of 59.9%. The rate of all other suicides declined from 19.9 deaths per 100,000 person-years in 1997 to 15.0 per 100,000 person-years in 2005, repre- senting a decline of 24.5%, and suggesting there was no substitution effect. The yearly change in firearm-related suicides in males was –8.7%, and the yearly change in other suicides was –4.1%, less than half the rate of fall in firearm suicide. Plainly, there is great interest in Australia’s experience in gun law reform.2 I wrote this book after the Port Arthur massacre, to provide a record of the events leading up to the law reforms, and the reaction to them. The book quickly went out of print and has ever since been very hard to obtain, with the publisher Pluto Press, since closing. I am very thankful to Sydney University Press for agreeing to republish the book in its original form, less the cartoons which were contained in the first edition. Unfortunately many of the links are no longer active (being old) and cannot be recovered. We recommend that those inclined to do so, try their luck finding them in the Wayback Machine.3 2 See ‘Australia – gun facts, figures and the law’ for specific information and updates: http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/cp/australia. 3 http://archive.org/web/web.php. 6 Foreword to the reprint edition My editor Agata Mrva-Montoya, who worked on my previous book with Sydney University Press,4 turned this around in weeks. I am very grateful to her. Simon Chapman 5 February 2013 4 Chapman S, Barratt A, Stockler M. Let sleeping dogs lie? What men should know before being tested for prostate cancer. Sydney: Sydney University Press, 2010, http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/6835. 7 Preface and acknowledgments to the 1998 edition This book was written for two main groups of readers. Foremost in my mind were Australians who were appalled by the Port Arthur gun mas- sacre which killed 35 people and who want to understand more about the struggle to secure the historic reform of gun laws in the months after the incident. For millions, the massacre and the long overdue need for reform of gun laws became a major topic of conversation among family, friends and workmates. Tens of thousands of you demonstrated in support of the new laws, wrote letters to politicians and expressed yourselves in public media such as letters to newspapers and calls to radio stations. The wisdom and timing of many of these contributions were enormously powerful in advancing the debate and convincing politicians of the huge community support for gun control, and that further excuses for inaction were unacceptable. I wanted to pay a sort of homage to this support, which more than one commentator pointed out was a wonderful example of non-violent ‘people power’ influencing law reform. I have also written the book for people working to promote gun control in other countries. As will become apparent, I believe that it was not by mere serendipity that a massacre translated into major law reform. There are many lessons for others in how such tragedies can be catalysts for radical change. Yet law reform following massacres is not inevitable; rather, it requires the planned, strategic use of media and other forms of advocacy to convert anger and outrage into action. A prerequisite for this change would appear to be a sustained period of 9 Over our dead bodies public advocacy for gun law reform that keys up communities to define soft gun laws as a blight on political courage and an affront to a safe community. Gun massacres force politicians to confront an electorate outraged at political spinelessness in an area which demands nothing less than strong leadership. Much of this book is an attempt to distil some lessons out of the chaos that became the day to day of the lives of those pushing for gun law reform in the months after Port Arthur. Along with Rebecca Peters (NSW), Roland Browne (Tasmania), Helen Gadsen (Queensland), Tim Costello (Victoria) and Charles Watson (NSW) I have been a spokesperson for the Coalition for Gun Control, a coalition of associations and individuals committed to tightening the regulation of guns in order to reduce gun violence in our community. The CGC became incorporated in 1995 in NSW and became a national group (thereafter, the National Coalition for Gun Control or NCGC) on 15 June 1996, when Rebecca was appointed national coordinator. Over 300 organisations from the fields of public health, medicine, law, domestic violence advocacy, women’s, religious, ethnic and community groups have supported NCGC lobbying activi- ties. While no longer active in the NCGC, between 1992 and 1996 I was one of its main members. Despite this huge support and the overwhelming weight of public opinion in favour of gun control, the NCGC today remains an organisa- tion run on the goodwill and dedication of volunteers, on the financial shoe-strings provided by public donations and on the occasional largesse of supportive organisations. Gun control has always been an immensely politicised issue. Despite an average of some 560 people who are killed by guns in Australia in each of the last six years, there has so far been no government with the courage or foresight to support the NCGC with little but pats on the back in times of mutual agreement. At one stage word was passed from the NSW Labor government that we would not be receiving funding because it was plain some of us were connected with the Liberal Party. We got the same news from the Federal (Liberal Coalition) government, being told that it was obvious the same people were Labor supporters. Frequently during the post–Port Arthur debate, 10 Preface and acknowledgments to the 1998 edition people would contact us and make comments that implied we were a huge organisation with a fully equipped office, salaried staff and a lot of money in the bank. Nothing could have been further from the truth.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sacrificing Steve
    Cultural Studies Review volume 16 number 2 September 2010 http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/csrj/index pp. 179–93 Luke Carman 2010 Sacrificing Steve How I Killed the Crocodile Hunter LUKE CARMAN UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY There has been a long campaign claiming that in a changed world and in a changed Australia, the values and symbols of old Australia are exclusive, oppressive and irrelevant. The campaign does not appear to have succeeded.1 Let’s begin this paper with a peculiar point of departure. Let’s abjure for the moment the approved conventions of academic discussion and begin not with the obligatory expounding of some contextualising theoretical locus, but instead with an immersion much more personal. Let’s embrace the pure, shattering honesty of humiliation. Let’s begin with a tale of shame and, for the sake of practicality, let’s make it mine. Early in September 2006, I was desperately trying to finish a paper on Australian representations of masculinity. The deadline had crept up on me, and I was caught struggling for a focusing point. I wanted a figure to drape my argument upon, one that would fit into a complicated and altogether shaky coagulation of ideas surrounding Australian icons, legends and images—someone who perfectly ISSN 1837-8692 straddled an exploration of masculine constructions within a framework of cringing insecurities and historical silences. I could think of men, I could think of iconic men, and I could think of them in limitless abundance, but none of them encapsulated everything I wanted to say.
    [Show full text]
  • Developments in Vehicle Regulation, Driver Testing and Licensing
    R T A Roads and Traffic Authority Oral History Program Developments in Vehicle Regulation, Driver Testing and Licensing Summary Report Researched and compiled by OHM Consultants (Mary Ann Hamilton and Sue Andersen) November 1999 ISBN 0 7313 0117 X Published December 2000 RTA/Pub 00.131 Prepared by. OHM Consultants (Mary Ann Hamilton and Sue Andersen) for. RTA Environment and Community Policy Branch Level 10 Pi T A 260 Elizabeth St SURRY HILLS 2010 Telephone (02)9218 6083 Fax: (02)9218 6970 V Copyright e NSW Roads and Traffic Authority. Roads and Traffic Authority 2000 www.rta.nsw.gov.au RTA Some comments about Oral History... Oral history has been described as "a picture of the past in people's own words". It reveals what you often won't find in the files and the history books - the facts and the real reasons things happened. It is told by the people who were there - those who were involved, who made it happen, who were affected - in the colour, passion and inflection of their own voices. Oral history accounts can also tell about relationships, perceptions, social and political climates, all of which are part of life and influence our actions and those of others. It often reveals the unsung heroes, the names of those actually responsible for innovations and important changes. So, oral history provides a counterbalance to the formal written record by providing the personal, intimate, human and social account of events and why they happened. The RTA Environment and Community Policy Branch established an Oral History Program in 1997, to investigate various topics of historical interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruising Yacht Club of Australia Annual Report Board of Directors Cruising Yacht Club of Australia
    07/08 Cruising Yacht Club of Australia Annual Report Board of Directors Cruising Yacht Club Of Australia Matt Allen Garry Linacre Michael Cranitch Alan Green Commodore Vice Commodore Rear Commodore Rear Commodore Paul Billingham John Cameron Richard Cawse Geoff Cropley Treasurer Director Director Director Howard Piggott Rod Skellet Graeme Wood Director Director Director 2 Cruising Yacht Club of Australia Annual Report: Year end 31 March 2008 Contents Board of Directors, Management and Sub-Committees 2 Membership, Life Members, Past Commodores & Obituary 3 Commodore’s Report 4 Treasurer’s Report 6 Sailing Committee Report 8 Audit, Planning & Risk Committee Report 10 Cruising Committee Report 11 Training & Development Committee Report 12 Marina & Site Committee Report 14 Member Services Committee Report 15 Associates Committee Report 16 Archives Committee Report 18 Directors’ Report 19 Independent Audit Report 22 Directors’ Declaration 23 Auditor’s Independence Declaration 24 Income Statement 25 Balance Sheet 26 Statement of Recognised Income & Expense 27 Notes to the Financial Statements 28 Supplementary Information 44 Members List 45 Yacht Register 58 CruisingCruising Yacht Yacht Club Club of Australiaof Australia 11 Photography : Rolex, Andrea Francolini, CYCA Staff AnnualAnnual Report: Report: Year Year end end 31 31March March 2008 2008 Board of Directors, Management & Sub-Committees 2007 - 2008 Board of Directors Sub-Committees Commodore Archives M. Allen R. Skellet (Chairman), B. Brenac, T. Cable, A. Campbell, D. Colfelt, J. Keelty, B. Psaltis, P. Shipway, G. Swan, Vice Commodore M.& J. York. G. Linacre Associates Rear-Commodores P. Messenger (President), P. Brinsmead, E. Carpenter, M. Cranitch, A. Green J. Dahl, F. Davies, P. Emerson, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Over Our Dead Bodies: Port Arthur and Australia's Fight for Gun Control
    OVER OUR DEAD BODIES Port Arthur and Australia’s fight for gun control Simon Chapman Copyright Originally published in 1998 by Pluto Press (Annandale, Australia) This reprint edition published in 2013 by SYDNEY UNIVERSITY PRESS © Simon Chapman 1998, 2013 © Sydney University Press 2013 Reproduction and Communication for other purposes Except as permitted under the Act, no part of this edition may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or communicated in any form or by any means without prior written permission. All requests for reproduction or communication should be made to Sydney University Press at the address below: Sydney University Press Fisher Library F03 University of Sydney NSW 2006 AUSTRALIA Email: [email protected] National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Chapman, Simon Title: Over our dead bodies : Port Arthur and Australia’s fight for gun control / Simon Chapman. ISBN: 9781743320310 (pbk.) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Gun control--Australia. Firearms ownership--Australia. Dewey Number: 363.330994 Cover design by Dushan Mrva-Montoya iv Contents Copyright iv Foreword to the reprint edition vi Preface and acknowledgments to the 1998 edition viii Introduction xii 1 The massacre 24 2 The case for fewer guns 57 3 The campaign for gun control 78 4 The main reforms 93 5 The gun lobby in Australia 121 6 The gun lobby’s arguments … and the responses 154 7 The future tasks for gun control 197 Other books by Simon Chapman 214 About the author 215 v Foreword to the reprint edition The firearm massacre at a primary school in Sandy Hook, Connecticut on 14 De- cember 2012 in which a lone gunman armed with three semi-automatic firearms killed 20 children, six teachers, his gun-owning mother and then himself, has stimulated unprecedented momentum for meaningful gun controls in the US.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Summer 2017 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Summer 2017 (As of July 1, 2017) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2,817 Race of Defendant: White 1,196 (42.46%) Black 1,168 (41.46%) Latino/Latina 373 (13.24%) Native American 26 (0.92%) Asian 53 (1.88%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,764 (98.12%) Female 53 (1.88%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 33 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 20 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Spring 2017 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2016 or 2017 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS First Amendment Packingham v. North Carolina, No. 15-1194 (Use of websites by sex offender) (decision below 777 S.E.2d 738 (N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Ways of Seeing': the Tasmanian Landscape in Literature
    THE TERRITORY OF TRUTH and ‘WAYS OF SEEING’: THE TASMANIAN LANDSCAPE IN LITERATURE ANNA DONALD (19449666) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of Western Australia School of Humanities (English and Cultural Studies) 2013 ii iii ABSTRACT The Territory of Truth examines the ‘need for place’ in humans and the roads by which people travel to find or construct that place, suggesting also what may happen to those who do not find a ‘place’. The novel shares a concern with the function of landscape and place in relation to concepts of identity and belonging: it considers the forces at work upon an individual when they move through differing landscapes and what it might be about those landscapes which attracts or repels. The novel explores interior feelings such as loss, loneliness, and fulfilment, and the ways in which identity is derived from personal, especially familial, relationships Set in Tasmania and Britain, the novel is narrated as a ‘voice play’ in which each character speaks from their ‘way of seeing’, their ‘truth’. This form of narrative was chosen because of the way stories, often those told to us, find a place in our memory: being part of the oral narrative of family, they affect our sense of self and our identity. The Territory of Truth suggests that identity is linked to a sense of self- worth and a belief that one ‘fits’ in to society. The characters demonstrate the ‘four ways of seeing’ as discussed in the exegesis. ‘“Ways of Seeing”: The Tasmanian Landscape in Literature’ considers the way humans identify with ‘place’, drawing on the ideas and theories of critics and commentators such as Edward Relph, Yi-fu Tuan, Roslynn Haynes, Richard Rossiter, Bruce Bennett, and Graham Huggan.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIANAPOLIS COLTS WEEKLY PRESS RELEASE Indiana Farm Bureau Football Center P.O
    INDIANAPOLIS COLTS WEEKLY PRESS RELEASE Indiana Farm Bureau Football Center P.O. Box 535000 Indianapolis, IN 46253 www.colts.com REGULAR SEASON WEEK 6 INDIANAPOLIS COLTS (3-2) VS. NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS (4-0) 8:30 P.M. EDT | SUNDAY, OCT. 18, 2015 | LUCAS OIL STADIUM COLTS HOST DEFENDING SUPER BOWL BROADCAST INFORMATION CHAMPION NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS TV coverage: NBC The Indianapolis Colts will host the New England Play-by-Play: Al Michaels Patriots on Sunday Night Football on NBC. Color Analyst: Cris Collinsworth Game time is set for 8:30 p.m. at Lucas Oil Sta- dium. Sideline: Michele Tafoya Radio coverage: WFNI & WLHK The matchup will mark the 75th all-time meeting between the teams in the regular season, with Play-by-Play: Bob Lamey the Patriots holding a 46-28 advantage. Color Analyst: Jim Sorgi Sideline: Matt Taylor Last week, the Colts defeated the Texans, 27- 20, on Thursday Night Football in Houston. The Radio coverage: Westwood One Sports victory gave the Colts their 16th consecutive win Colts Wide Receiver within the AFC South Division, which set a new Play-by-Play: Kevin Kugler Andre Johnson NFL record and is currently the longest active Color Analyst: James Lofton streak in the league. Quarterback Matt Hasselbeck started for the second consecutive INDIANAPOLIS COLTS 2015 SCHEDULE week and completed 18-of-29 passes for 213 yards and two touch- downs. Indianapolis got off to a quick 13-0 lead after kicker Adam PRESEASON (1-3) Vinatieri connected on two field goals and wide receiver Andre John- Day Date Opponent TV Time/Result son caught a touchdown.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004: Volume 16
    2 Journal on Firearms and Public Policy VOLUME 16 The Journal on Firearms and Public Policy is the official publication of the Center for the Study of Firearms and Public Policy of the Second Amendment Foundation. Editor Publisher David B. Kopel, J.D. Julianne Versnel Gottlieb Independence Institute Women & Guns Magazine Board of Advisors Randy E. Barnett, J.D. Edward F. Leddy, Ph.D. David Bordua, Ph.D. Andrew McClurg, J.D. David I. Caplan, Ph.D., J.D. Glenn Harlan Reynolds, J.D. Brendan Furnish, Ph.D. Joseph P. Tartaro Alan M. Gottlieb William Tonso, Ph.D. Don B. Kates, Jr., J.D. Eugene Volokh, J.D. Gary Kleck, Ph.D. James K. Whisker, Ph.D. Journal Policy The Second Amendment Foundation sponsors this journal to encourage objective research. The Foundation invites submission of research papers of scholarly quality from a variety of disciplines, regardless of whether their conclusions support the Foundation's positions on controversial issues. Manuscripts should be sent in duplicate to: Center for the Study on Firearms and Public Policy, a division of the Second Amendment Foundation, 12500 N.E. Tenth Place, Bellevue, Washington 98005 or sent via email to www.saf.org 3 This publication is copyrighted ©2004 by the Second Amendment Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means including information storage and retrieval systems without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. The Second Amendment Foundation is a non-profit educational foundation dedicated to promoting a better understanding of our Constitutional heritage to privately own and possess firearms.
    [Show full text]
  • Designed to Kill: Gun Control and the Dunblane and Columbine Massacres
    Designed to Kill: Gun Control and the Dunblane and Columbine Massacres Gwendolyn M. Martin Senior Thesis Political Science Advisor: Sidney Waldman 11 April, 2003 In Memory of Laura Wilcox and everyone whose dreams were cut short by gun violence. 2 Introduction On March 13, 1996, Thomas Hamilton opened fire in Dunblane Primary School’s gymnasium in Scotland, killing sixteen five- and six-year olds and their teacher as well as himself. Just over three years later, on April 20, 1999, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris shot and killed fourteen students and a teacher at Columbine High School in Colorado before taking their own lives. Each incident shocked the world and redefined each nation’s sense of safety as two suburban towns came to symbolize all that is dangerous in the world. The stories of the injured, dead, and emotionally scarred entered the national psyche (Homsher 2001: 232). Although not representative of gun violence nationally, these mass shootings defined the gun issue in the public’s mind. Consequently, they were defining moments in each country’s gun control debate. The actions taken as a consequence had the potential to redefine the national identity. Despite the similarities of the incidents, the effects were markedly different. In the United Kingdom (UK), lawmakers had put in place a ban on all private handgun ownership in homes within two years of the incident. In contrast, the Columbine shootings brought no significant changes in national gun laws, or even other types of violence-related legislation. The parallels between the Columbine and Dunblane shootings were undeniably strong.
    [Show full text]
  • Knight V Commonwealth of Australia (No 3)
    SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY Case Title: Knight v Commonwealth of Australia (No 3) Citation: [2017] ACTSC 3 Hearing Dates: 4, 7 May, 3 August, 3 November 2015 Decision Date: 13 January 2017 Before: Mossop AsJ Decision: See [233] Catchwords: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – Application for extension of time – Claim for damages arising out of assault and negligence – Multiple incidents giving rise to claims – Incidents occurred while plaintiff was a cadet at the Royal Military College, Duntroon – Plaintiff subsequently sentenced and imprisoned for separate incident – 27-year delay in commencing proceedings – Whether Limitation Act 1985 (ACT) s 36 permitting the grant of an extension of time applies – Whether an explanation for the delay existed – Whether just and reasonable to grant extension of time – Consideration s 36(3) considerations – Meaning of disability for the purposes of s 36(3)(d) – Broader significance in relation to abuse in the armed services – Significance of absence of other remedies – Proportionality between damages and cost and effort associated with running claim – Whether proceedings amount to abuse of process – Whether use of proceedings as a means of achieving an interstate transfer predominant purpose of bringing proceedings – application dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Law (Wrongs) Amendment 2003 (No 2) (ACT), s 58 Corrections Act 1986 (Vic), s 74AA Corrections Amendment (Parole) Act 2014 (Vic) Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 (ACT), s 244 Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984 (Vic) Legislation
    [Show full text]
  • Smiling Assassin Gets Life
    ntnews.com.aulllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll NATION ABBOTT TO AXE JOBS CANBERRA: Federal Opposit- ion Leader Tony Abbott yesterday indicated public servant job cuts under a Coalition government may Smiling be even larger than the 12,000 previously targeted, sparking an angry response from unions and disbelief from the government. FLOODWATERS PEAK assassin MELBOURNE: Residents in the flood-besieged Victorian town of Nathalia are increas- ingly confident they can beat the wall of water threaten- ing them, with flooding de- clared to have peaked. About gets life 90 per cent of the town’s 1400 residents have stayed to defend their properties. By AMY DALE — but after ‘‘observing her’’ for some time, he was forced RINEHART LOSES BID SYDNEY: Former US Marine to abandon this plan. SYDNEY: The High Court has Walter Marsh stared past the The 51-year-old then went knocked back Gina Rinehart’s relieved cheers of Michelle on to murder his former boss bid to challenge orders al- Beets’ family and friends yes- in a ‘‘brutal attack’’. lowing her family trust battle terday to greet with a smile In sentencing him yester- to be made public. The court the news that he will spend day, Justice Derek Price yesterday refused to grant the rest of his life in jail. described the murder of Ms Australia’s richest person But behind the grin yester- Beets as ‘‘cruel, merciless leave to appeal against a de- day was the startling revel- and abhorrent’’. cision revoking suppression ation of just how close he The emergency nursing orders made in the NSW came to allegedly murdering unit manager at Sydney’s Supreme Court legal dispute.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Staff Under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution Or Black Hole?
    Ministerial Staff Under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution or Black Hole? Author Tiernan, Anne-Maree Published 2005 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Department of Politics and Public Policy DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3587 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367746 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Ministerial Staff under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution or Black Hole? Anne-Maree Tiernan BA (Australian National University) BComm (Hons) (Griffith University) Department of Politics and Public Policy, Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2004 Abstract This thesis traces the development of the ministerial staffing system in Australian Commonwealth government from 1972 to the present. It explores four aspects of its contemporary operations that are potentially problematic. These are: the accountability of ministerial staff, their conduct and behaviour, the adequacy of current arrangements for managing and controlling the staff, and their fit within a Westminster-style political system. In the thirty years since its formal introduction by the Whitlam government, the ministerial staffing system has evolved to become a powerful new political institution within the Australian core executive. Its growing importance is reflected in the significant growth in ministerial staff numbers, in their increasing seniority and status, and in the progressive expansion of their role and influence. There is now broad acceptance that ministerial staff play necessary and legitimate roles, assisting overloaded ministers to cope with the unrelenting demands of their jobs. However, recent controversies involving ministerial staff indicate that concerns persist about their accountability, about their role and conduct, and about their impact on the system of advice and support to ministers and prime ministers.
    [Show full text]