Biodiversity and Composition of Methanogenic Populations in The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
RESEARCH ARTICLE Biodiversity and composition of methanogenic populations in the rumen of cows fed alfalfa hay or triticale straw Yunhong Kong1,2, Yun Xia2, Robert Seviour3, Robert Forster2 & Tim A. McAllister2 1Department of Biological Science and Technology, Kunming University, Kunming, China; 2Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada; and 3Biotechnology Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Vic., Australia Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/84/2/302/478402 by guest on 01 October 2021 Correspondence: Tim A. McAllister, Abstract Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 5403 1st Avenue South, It is clear that methanogens are responsible for ruminal methane emissions, Lethbridge, AB, Canada. but quantitative information about the composition of the methanogenic com- Tel.: +1 403 3172240; munity in the bovine rumen is still limited. The diversity and composition of fax: +1 403 3823156; rumen methanogens in cows fed either alfalfa hay or triticale straw were exam- e-mail: [email protected] ined using a full-cycle rRNA approach. Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization undertaken applying oligonucleotide probes designed here identi- Received 4 October 2012; revised 6 December 2012; accepted 12 December fied five major methanogenic populations or groups in these animals: the Met- 2012. hanobrevibacter TMS group (consisting of Methanobrevibacter thaueri, Final version published online 8 January Methanobrevibacter millerae and Methanobrevibacter smithii), Methanbrevibacter 2013. ruminantium-, Methanosphaera stadtmanae-, Methanomicrobium mobile-, and Methanimicrococcus-related methanogens. The TMS- and M. ruminantium- DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12062 related methanogens accounted for on average 46% and 41% of the total meth- anogenic cells in liquid (Liq) and solid (Sol) phases of the rumen contents, Editor: Julian Marchesi respectively. Other prominent methanogens in the Liq and Sol phases included members of M. stadtmanae (15% and 33%), M. mobile (17% and 12%), and Keywords full-cycle rRNA approach; FISH; Methanimicrococcus (23% and 9%). The relative abundances of these methano- methanogens; rumen ecology. gens in the community varied among individual animals and across diets. No clear differences in community composition could be observed with dietary change using cloning techniques. This study extends the known biodiversity levels of the methanogenic communities in the rumen of cows. host (Ellis et al., 2007). Methanogenesis leads to a loss of Introduction dietary energy and contributes to climate change, which Archaea constitute about 3–4% of the total microbial together emphasize that a better understanding of the numbers in the rumen with the majority of this domain microbiology of methanogenesis is essential for green- being methanogens (Lin et al., 1997; Sharp et al., 1998; house gas mitigation and improvement of production Yanagita et al., 2000; Ziemer et al., 2000). Most ruminal efficiency in the livestock industry (Janssen & Kirs, 2008). methanogens utilize H2 or formate as substrates and Eight methanogenic species have been isolated, cul- derive energy from the reduction of CO2 to CH4. In the tured, and identified from the bovine rumen. They are rumen, polymeric carbohydrates and proteins are Methanobrevibacter smithii, Methanbrevibacter ruminanti- þ degraded to volatile fatty acids, NH4 ,CO2, and H2. Dis- um, Methanobrevibacter thaueri, Methanosphaera stadtm- posal of H2 through the reduction of CO2 to CH4 is anae, Methanobacterium aarhusense, Methanobacterium essential to prevent the accumulation of reducing equiva- formicicum, Methanosarcina barkeri, and Methanomicrobi- MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY MICROBIOLOGY lents and the overall impedance of ruminal fermentation. um mobile (Jarvis et al., 2000; Whitford et al., 2001; Methane is a potent greenhouse gas with a global warm- Nicholson et al., 2007; Wright et al., 2007). However, ing potential that is 25 times that of CO2, and emissions many of the methanogens identified through sequencing can account for 2–12% of the gross energy intake of the techniques have not been cultured in the laboratory, but ª 2012 Federation of European Microbiological Societies FEMS Microbiol Ecol 84 (2013) 302–315 Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved Composition of ruminal methanogenic communities 303 two genera, Methanobrevibacter and Methanomicrobium, samples were collected in the last week of this second and a clade that is distantly related to the genus Ther- period. Before the cattle were fed, rumen digesta was col- moplasma [also referred as the RCC cluster (Janssen & lected from three sites (reticulum, dorsal, and ventral sac) Kirs, 2008)] appear to account for the majority of rumen within the rumen, thoroughly mixed and a subsample methanogens (Wright et al., 2007; Hook et al., 2009; King was placed in 200-mL air-tight centrifuge tubes and et al., 2011; Tymensen et al., 2012). immediately transported to the laboratory. Before DNA Most studies examining changes in the composition of extraction, rumen samples from each animal were ruminal methanogenic communities have used 16S rRNA fractioned into liquid, feed particle loosely associated and gene clone library analyses. However, such data cannot be feed particle adherent fractions as described by assessed quantitatively (Head et al., 1998) and only a few Kong et al. (2010a). studies have attempted to quantify individual rumen methanogenic community members. Using reverse trans- Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/84/2/302/478402 by guest on 01 October 2021 FISH sample fixation and FISH probing criptase qPCR, Zhou et al. (2009) reported that the size of ruminal methanogenic community was not affected in Samples for FISH were prepared as described by Kong cattle in response to a low or high energy diet. With et al. (2010b). Briefly, digesta samples were collected from qPCR, Tymensen et al., (2012) showed that switching the the rumen as described above. On-site, the mixture diet from forage to high-grain resulted in a profound (100 mL) was then transferred to a heavy-wall 250-mL reduction in total RCC abundance and an increase in the beaker and squeezed using a Bodum (Bodum Inc., Trien- relative abundance of free-living Methanobrevibacter spp. gen, Switzerland) coffee maker plunger. The extruded However, all such studies have been carried out at the liquid samples were fixed in paraformaldehyde (PFA, 4% whole community or genus level, and the composition of final concentration) for FISH probing of planktonic the methanogenic community at the species level is less methanogens (i.e. those in the Liq phase). The remaining clear. liquid was discarded, and the squeezed particulate sam- In this study, the full-cycle rRNA approach (Amann ples containing particle-associated cells were also fixed in et al., 1995) was used to investigate the composition of 4% PFA. After 3 h fixation, these particulate samples methanogenic populations in the liquid (Liq) and solid together with 4% PFA solutions were ‘stomached’ (Stom- fraction (Sol) of the rumen digesta of cows fed a high- acher 400 Circulator, Seaward, UK) at 230 r.p.m. for quality forage in the form of alfalfa hay or a low-quality 6 min. Stomached samples were then transferred into forage in the form of triticale straw. 16S rRNA gene clone clean 250-mL beakers and squeezed again. Filtrates were libraries were constructed using pooled DNA templates centrifuged (5000 g) to recover cells, which were then from rumen DNA of individual animals fed the same or washed three times with 19 PBS buffer, resuspended in À different diet(s). Oligonucleotide 16S rRNA gene-targeted 50% ethanol (ca. 8–10 g L 1 dry weight) and stored probes were designed against sequences retrieved from at À20 °C until FISH probing of methanogens associated clone libraries. Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridiza- with particulate digesta was executed (i.e. methanogens in tion (qFISH) was used to estimate the relative abun- the Sol phase). dances of individual members of the methanogenic FISH was carried out according to Amann (1995) on populations to investigate changes among individual ani- glass cover slips coated with gelatin (Kong et al., 2010a) mals and diets. according the procedure described by Xia et al. (2012). Compositions of the methanogen communities in the Liq and Sol were screened with previously described oligonu- Materials and methods cleotide probes targeting methanogens at the family or order level. Those used were MB1174 (Raskin et al., Sample collection and fractionation 1994) for members of the Methanobacteriales, MS1414 Sample collection and fractionation of the rumen digesta (Raskin et al., 1994) for Methanosarcinaceae, MX825 were carried out as described previously (Kong et al., (Raskin et al., 1994) for Methanosaetaceae and MG1200b 2010a). Briefly, four mature rumen-cannulated dry Hol- (Crocetti et al., 2006) for Methanomicrobiales. The probe stein cows were used in this crossover study. In the first ARC915 (Stahl & Amann, 1991) was used to estimate the 1-month period, two cows were fed alfalfa hay plus 2 kg total numbers of Archaea in each sample. Hybridization of a dry cow protein/mineral supplement, while the other conditions and optimal formamide concentrations for two were fed triticale straw plus 2 kg of supplement. these probes are listed in probeBase (Loy et al., 2003). Rumen samples were obtained in the last week of this 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining