DOCSLIB.ORG

Yambio Town Road Monitoring South Sudan Displacement Crisis Yambio County, Western Equatoria State, South Sudan March 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yambio Town Road Monitoring South Sudan Displacement Crisis Yambio County, Western Equatoria State, South Sudan March 2019 Yambio Town Road Monitoring South Sudan Displacement Crisis Yambio County, Western Equatoria State, South Sudan March 2019 CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY Western Bahr Sudan el Ghazal Ethiopia Yambio town is located in Yambio County, Western Equatoria State, near South Sudan’s WWesternarra pEquatoria ARRIVALS TO YAMBIO TOWN C.A.R. Lakes 3 border with the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Yambio town was the centre ua Demographic Previous location - Country of significant armed clashes and widespread displacement in 2016, and hosts a large D.R.C. Kenya Country of most recent long term location for arriving HHs: population of internally displaced persons (IDPs) many of whom have started to return Nagero Uganda home as of early 2018. Children 32 % South Sudan 99 % This factsheet provides results from the REACH road monitoring exercise in Yambio Main routes of population Uganda 1 % town, Yambio County. REACH monitors four bus/car parks in Yambio town to record Tambura movement Mvolo Women 34 % the arrivals and departures of people on a daily basis. Daily data is synthesisedC intoent raa l Nzara monthly factsheet to provide an overview of wider movement trends, including push/pull factors and intentions. African Men 35 % Republic Mundri31+ 34+35t 97+3t The following findings are based on primary data collected between 5 and 29 March Mundri From/To Juba 2019, during which 309 departing HHs (505 individuals) and 111 arriving HHs (199 Ezo Ibba West Easoft the total arriving HHs expressed the intention to remain in individuals) were recorded, along with 12 HHs (16 individuals) that were transiting Maridi 23% Yambio town permanently. Household composition through Yambio town.1 Enumerators interviewed respondents who were arriving in and Yambio 5 departing from any of Yambio town’s three (Tambura, Nzara and Maridi) bus/car parks. Arriving households Reported composition of HHs arriving in Yambio town: Not all entry points to Yambio town were covered systematically and the entry points Yambio Town along the border with DRC were not covered. Some arrivals and departures reportedly 4 average number of individuals travelling in each HH. Partial family 97 % took place outside of data collection hours (9:00 a.m - 5:30 p.m). Moreover, departuresAngo Central of arriving HHs are made up of one individual. are over-represented due to many arrivals getting off buses early due to the matatu E53%quatoria system.2 As such, the data presented in this factsheet is not representative, rather Dungu Whole family 3 % indicative of movement trends for the assessed population. e Previous location - County Areas of most recent long term location of HHs arriving in Yambio town: 97+3t DEPARTURES FROM YAMBIO TOWN Push factors 44+23+13+11+3 Primary push factors reported by departing HHs for leaving Yambio town: Nzara County 44 % TRANSITS THROUGH YAMBIO TOWN of the total departing HHs intended to stay at their final 49+15+13+11+6 59% destination for 6 months or less. Far from the family 49 % Juba County 23 % Transits recorded in Yambio (12 HHs) in March consisted of HHs travelling Maridi County 13 % Demographic3 Lack of work opportunities 15 % through Yambio Town as part of longer journeys, such as HHs coming from Lack of health services 13 % Tambura County 11 % Tambura to Juba or vice versa. One HH was passing through Yambio town from Uganda to reach Obo, Central African Republic. In those cases, push 11 % Ezo County 3 % Children 23 % Lack of market and pull factors mainly revolved around searching for work opportunities, Other 6 % Intended duration of stay in Yambio town markets and joining their families. Women 46 % Reported length of time that arriving HHs intend to stay in Yambio town: From the Yambio bus/car parks, no HHs were recorded to be transiting Intended destination 39+24+11+23+4 to and from the DRC in March, although cross border movement is likely Less than a month 39 % Men 31 % Intended destination of departing HHs: more noticeable in areas of Yambio County closer to the border with DRC 23+46+31+t 91% of the total departing HHs intend to stay within Western One month to six months 24 % where REACH is currently not collecting data. Equatoria State. More than six months 11 % Departing households Primary intended areas of destination in the Equatorias for departing Do not intend to leave 23 % HHs: average number of individuals per HH. 62+10+10+5+3 Not sure 4 % 4 62 % Nzara County Pull factors 57% of departing HHs are made up of one individual travelling alone. Tambura County 10 % Primary pull factors reported by arriving HHs for choosing to come to Maridi County 10 % Area of origin of departing households4 Yambio town:4 Juba County 7 % 38+30+13+7+6 Presence of family 38 % of the total departing HHs are originally from Western Equatoria Ezo County 3 % 94% Presence of market 30 % State. Intended duration of stay at destination County of origin of departing HHs: Presence of work opportunities 13 % 31+27+16+8+2+2 Yambio County 31 % Reported length of time that departing HHs intend to stay in the Presence of health services 7 % location that they are departing for: Presence of education services 6 % Nzara County 27 % 42+17+6+30+5 Tambura County 16 % Less than a month 42 % Notes: 17 % 1. Due to the negligible number of transits recorded, a detailed analysis of the dynamics of transiting households was not included in this factsheet, apart from a short narrative section. Maridi County 8 % One month to six months Transit data can be obtained on request. 2 % Over six months 6 % 2. Common throughout East Africa, the matatu system involves buses that follow a set route in which passenger get on and get off at pre-determined stops. This means that many arriving Ezo County passengers often get off at their stops before reaching Yambio town, while departing vehicles are nearly always full. Ibba County 2 % Do not intend to return 30 % 3. These are indicative trends; REACH does not record all arrivals and departures. Not sure 5 % 4. Reported presence of services or opportunities is indicative of respondents’ perception and does not necessarily reflect availability. 5. “Partial” in the sense that not all members of the HHs were travelling with the interviewed HHs. For more information on this profile please contact: REACH - [email protected] .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yambio Town Road Monitoring South Sudan Displacement Crisis Yambio County, Western Equatoria State, South Sudan August 2018
    Yambio Town Road Monitoring South Sudan Displacement Crisis Yambio County, Western Equatoria State, South Sudan August 2018 Sudan CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY Western Bahr Ethiopia Yambio town is located in Yambio County, Western Equatoria State, near South Sudan’s el Ghazal WWesternarra pEquatoria ARRIVALS TO YAMBIO TOWN C.A.R. Lakes Previous location - Country border with the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Yambio town was the centre ua Demographic3 of significant armed clashes and widespread displacement in 2016, and hosts a large D.R.C. Kenya Country of most recent long term location for arriving HHs: population of internally displaced persons (IDPs) many of whom have started to return home Nagero Uganda as of early 2018. Children 30 % This factsheet provides results from the REACH road monitoring exercise in Yambio town, Main routes of Tambura displacement South Sudan 95 % Yambio County. REACH monitors four bus/car parks in Yambio town to record the arrivals volo Women 39 % and departures of people on a daily basis. Daily data is synthesised into a monthly factsheetCentra l Nzara Central African Republic 3 % to provide an overview of wider movement trends, including push/pull factors and intentions. African DRC 2% The following findings are based on primary data collected between 2 and 30 August 2018, Men 30 % Republic dri 30+39+30t during which 190 departing HHs (378 individuals) and 64 arriving HHs (125 individuals) 95+3+2t Mundri 1 st were recorded, along with 6 HHs (14 individuals) that were transiting through Yambio town. Ezo Ibba Easoft the total arriving HHs expressed the intention to remain in Enumerators interviewed respondents who were arriving in and departing from any of 5 % Yambio town permanently.
    [Show full text]
  • COP 2017 Approval Meeting Outbrief - South Sudan
    COP 2017 Approval Meeting Outbrief - South Sudan 29 APRIL 2017 Johannesburg, South Africa DISPLACEMENT FOOD INSECURITY December 2016 December 2016 >3M PEOPLE Progress on COP16 Implementation 3 South Sudan PLHIV and PEPFAR ART Coverage, FY16 A New Era of Accountability, Transparency, and Solidarity to Accelerate IMPACT4 PLHIV & Unmet Need across PEPFAR-Supported SNUs by end of SAPR FY17 44% of all PLHIV in South Sudan are in PEPFAR-supported SNUs in Equatoria: 25% of all PLHIV in South Sudan are in PEPFAR-supported Scale-Up Aggressive SNUs 20% of PLHIV in Scale-Up NATIONAL PLHIV ON ART 10% Aggressive on ART 12% of PLHIV in Sustained SNUs on ART 12000 100% 100% 100% 120% 94% 90% 93% 90% 94% 95% 91% 10000 86% 81% 84% 100% 8000 67% 80% 53% 6000 47% 60% No. of PLHIV ofNo. 4000 40% 2000 20% 0 0% Juba Ezo Yambio Magwi Nzara Yei KajoKeji Tambura Torit Maridi Morobo Lainya Kapoeta Mundri Mundri Ibba County County County County County County County County County County County County South West East County Current on ART Unmet Need % Unmet Need County County County All PEPFAR FY 2017 Q2 program results and achievements included within this presentation were based upon preliminary reporting and may differ from the final submission results. Final FY 2017 Q2 results, as well as past and future quarterly and annual PEPFAR program results, can be accessed on the PEPFAR Dashboard at http://data.pepfar.net. A New Era of Accountability, Transparency, and Solidarity to Accelerate IMPACT South Sudan COP15 (FY16) and COP16 (FY17) Implementation FY16 APR FY17
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Country Operational Plan (COP)
    FY 2015 South Sudan Country Operational Plan (COP) The following elements included in this document, in addition to “Budget and Target Reports” posted separately on www.PEPFAR.gov, reflect the approved FY 2015 COP for South Sudan. 1) FY 2015 COP Strategic Development Summary (SDS) narrative communicates the epidemiologic and country/regional context; methods used for programmatic design; findings of integrated data analysis; and strategic direction for the investments and programs. Note that PEPFAR summary targets discussed within the SDS were accurate as of COP approval and may have been adjusted as site- specific targets were finalized. See the “COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit” sheets that follow for final approved targets. 2) COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit includes approved COP 15 targets (targets to be achieved by September 30, 2016). As noted, these may differ from targets embedded within the SDS narrative document and reflect final approved targets. Approved FY 2015 COP budgets by mechanism and program area, and summary targets are posted as a separate document on www.PEPFAR.gov in the “FY 2015 Country Operational Plan Budget and Target Report.” South Sudan Country/Regional Operational Plan (COP/ROP) 2015 Strategic Direction Summary August 27, 2015 Table of Contents Goal Statement 1.0 Epidemic, Response, and Program Context 1.1 Summary statistics, disease burden and epidemic profile 1.2 Investment profile 1.3 Sustainability Profile 1.4 Alignment of PEPFAR investments geographically to burden of disease 1.5 Stakeholder engagement
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Overview: Western Equatoria State, South Sudan January - March 2020
    Situation Overview: Western Equatoria State, South Sudan January - March 2020 Introduction Map 1: REACH assessment coverage of Western Equatoria state, January (A), February (B) and METHODOLOGY Through the first quarter of 2020, humanitarian March (C) 2020 A B To provide an overview of the situation in hard- needs in Western Equatoria State (WES) were to-reach areas of Western Equatoria, REACH impacted by displacement, insecurity, bush uses primary data from key informants who fires and emerging COVID-19 restrictions. have recently arrived from, recently visited, or Information remains critical for an informed receive regular information from a settlement response, yet movement restrictions due to the 0 - 4.9% or “Area of Knowledge” (AoK). Information for this report was collected from key informants in COVID-19 measures have limited humanitarian 5 - 10% access to many areas across the region. Yambio and Maridi towns in Western Equatoria 11 - 20% C State in January, February and March 2020. To inform humanitarian actors working outside In-depth interviews on humanitarian needs 21 - 50% formal settlement sites, REACH has conducted were conducted throughout the month using assessments of hard-to-reach areas in South 51 - 100% a structured survey tool. After data collection Sudan since December 2015. Data is collected was completed, all data was aggregated at on a monthly basis through interviews with key Assessed settlement settlement level, and settlements were assigned informants (KIs) with knowledge of a settlement the modal or most credible response. When no and triangulated with focus group discussions # of key informant interviews conducted: 611 consensus could be found for a settlement, that (FGDs).
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) Report — Lakes State, Western and Eastern Equatoria
    South Sudan water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) Report — Lakes State, Western and Eastern Equatoria January 2021 South Sudan WASH Report — Lakes State, Western and Eastern Equatoria Cover photo credit: Gatbel Chany, 2021 About REACH REACH facilitates the development of information tools and products that enhance the capacity of aid actors to make evidence-based decisions in emergency, recovery and development contexts. The methodologies used by REACH include primary data collection and in-depth analysis, and all activities are conducted through inter-agency aid coordination mechanisms. REACH is a joint initiative of IMPACT Initiatives, ACTED and the United Nations Institute for Training and Research - Operational Satellite Applications Programme (UNITAR-UNOSAT). For more information please visit our website: www.reach-initiative.org. You can contact us directly at: geneva@reach- initiative.org and follow us on Twitter @REACH_info. 1 South Sudan WASH Report — Lakes State, Western and Eastern Equatoria CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 3 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................................... 4 FINDINGS .................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Access to water ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Primary Justice in South Sudan Challenges, Concerns, and Elements That Work
    Exploring Primary Justice in South Sudan Challenges, concerns, and elements that work Bruno Braak Exploring Primary Justice in South Sudan – Challenges, concerns, and elements that work Bruno Braak Colophon Exploring Primary Justice in South Sudan – Challenges, concerns, and elements that work. South Sudan country report of the project ‘Supporting Primary Justice in Insecure Contexts: South Sudan and Afghanistan’. This project was funded by NWO-WOTRO in collaboration with the Knowledge Platform on Security and Rule of Law. Carried out by: Van Vollenhoven Institute for Law, Governance, and Society, and Cordaid in cooperation with the Justice and Peace Commission of the Catholic Diocese of Tombura-Yambio Authors Bruno Braak Design: UFB Grafimedia, Leiden © 2016 VVI / Authors All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this report may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author(s) of the report. The views expressed and analysis put forward in this report are entirely those of the author(s) and cannot be attributed to organizations involved in the project or its donors. Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 Legislative framework ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010
    Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 Southern Sudan 2010 for Yearbook Statistical Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation P.O. Box 137, Juba. Tel: +249 811 823 835 Email: [email protected], [email protected] Website: www.ssccse.org Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation P.O. Box 137, Juba. Tel: +249 811 823 835 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Website: www.ssccse.org Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 Table Of Contents I Chairperson’s Foreword xi II SSCCSE:Functions and Organisation xii III Geographical Overview (Maps) 1 IV Population and Demography 7 V Household Characteristics and Basic Services 33 VI Education 47 VII Health 77 VIII Agriculture, Food Security and Forestry 85 IX Displacement 101 X Demining 105 XI Political Representation 109 XII International Relations 117 XIII Consumption and Poverty 121 XIV Telecommunications 133 XV Businesses and Cooperatives 139 XVI Money, Banking and Credit 145 XVII Government Finance 153 Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 | iii Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 List Of Tables, Maps and Graphs III Geographical Overview (Maps) 1 Overview of States 2 2 Overview of States and Counties 2 3 Major Motorable Roads 3 4 Major Operational Airfields 3 5 Major Rivers and Water Bodies 4 6 Southern Sudan Topography 4 7 Land Use in Southern Sudan 5 8 Avg Rainfall in Southern Sudan 5 9 Agro Climatic Zones 6 IV Population and Demography List10 Of TablesMap: Total Population 8 11 Population by State and Sex.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Survey and Needs Assessment for Children and Mothers Partnerships (Champs) Project in Nzara County, Western Equatoria State- South Sudan
    BASELINE SURVEY AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CHILDREN AND MOTHERS PARTNERSHIPS (CHAMPS) PROJECT IN NZARA COUNTY, WESTERN EQUATORIA STATE- SOUTH SUDAN Submitted to CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD Prepared by CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD- SOUTH SUDAN April 2015 1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................................... 2 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVI ATIONS ............................................................................................................. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 2 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODU CTION ................................................................................................................. 18 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................ 18 1.2 CMMB SOUTH SUDAN COUNTRY PROGRAM ............................................................................... 18 1.3 MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH: THE GLOBAL CONTEXT ................................................. 19 1.4 MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH: SOUTH SUDAN COUNTRY CONTEXT ....................... 23 1.5 OBJECTIVES OF THE BASELINE AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of SOUTH SUDAN
    For Humanitarian Purposes Only Reference Map The Republic of SOUTH SUDAN Production date: 15 June 2017 24°0'0"E 25°0'0"E 26°0'0"E 27°0'0"E 28°0'0"E 29°0'0"E 30°0'0"E 31°0'0"E 32°0'0"E 33°0'0"E 34°0'0"E 35°0'0"E 36°0'0"E 37°0'0"E Kalu Shearia Shaqq Al Gawa Garoula ÆÖ Redis, Abu Zabad Kashafa, Jouri Dauro IDP camps "Emtitode " Ghubaysh Ayaal-Edris Saferi "Neem ÖÆ Baddal PoC N ""Wounthau Delling " Nyala Remela "Dukduk 0 "Tayyibah ' Muhajiriya Saheib Hai Jebeleen" "Halaka 0 R K e Mabrouka o Habila n ° s ×Æ Tono k t - i Spontaneous settlement 2 Abu Shalaya "Wun Ghir " 1 Dalami Rashad El Roseires ² "Wunchol Dago Ed Damazine ÖÆ Baraka Wad Hassib " Keikei "Kumsur Rom " Refugee camp Um Boim El Fula " Saraya Boma Manyo County Omar" Solwong Murr Renk Girru Um La`ota Abu Ajura Abu Karaynka Settlements Al Marwahah Faki Ibrahim "Chamidi-A Umm Heitan "Abayok Abu Jubaiha \ Gettin o Ed Daein R . D l e i b Country capital Lagawa "Alek "Bangjang Abu Tabanu El Buheimer Renk County "Lon" gtem " Gereida " Molbok Ktpiol State capital Heiban Barbari Kubbi " Shergeila Tullus Jidad County capital N " "Jalhak " Miri Juwa Kadugli Wun Atem 0 ' " Injbara 0 Sibdu ° Wad Rizq Far` Al Habil Principal town Manang" 1 Al Malwi t lu 1 e Harazah Ruqay M R Umm Dorain Kologi - Mumallah k . n Keilak " e S Anunbul R a Buram ng " e i Sudan r Geissan Village Ab u G A e t b Finote Selam h i S a m a i h l - a d a e w - R .
    [Show full text]
  • CMMB SOUTH SUDAN PROFILE Children and Mothers’ Partnerships, Western Equatoria State
    CMMB SOUTH SUDAN PROFILE Children and Mothers’ Partnerships, Western Equatoria State June 2015 CMMB 100 Wall Street, 9th Floor New York, NY 10005 www.cmmb.org SOUTH SUDAN PROFILE: CHILDREN AND MOTHERS’ PARTNERSHIPS (CHAMPS), WESTERN EQUATORIA STATE Introduction Catholic Medical Mission Board has launched CHAMPS—a 15-year, comprehensive initiative to target the most prevalent and fundamental causes of mortality and morbidity among women and children in targeted communities around the world. One of these communities is Nzara County, an impoverished, remote area in South Sudan’s Western Equatoria State (WES) that has a population of roughly 72,000 and, after years of civil war and other violence, suffers from a host of major public health problems. These difficulties are highlighted by numerous disturbing statistics, as WES suffers from one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the world, as well as post-natal care. CMMB recently conducted an extensive assessment of health-related needs in Nzara, including a study of health facilities in Nzara as well as the surrounding area, such as Yambio State Hospital, which is in neighboring Yambio County, is the primary referral hospital for Nzara County, and serves a catchment area of 187,000 people. The assessment also included a household survey questionnaire, key informant/stakeholder interviews, and focus groups, through which the community identified key health issues. The assessment highlighted serious problems with respect to services for pregnant women, HIV, public education, clean water, gender-based violence, child protection, and nutrition. These problems are systemic in nature, and cannot be solved through discrete, isolated interventions; rather, a multi-faceted approach is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for a Farmer Field School Approach in the Greenbelt of South Sudan
    SLE Publication Series – S253 SLE – Postgraduate Studies on International Cooperation Study commissioned by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Achieving Food Security in a Post Conflict Context Recommendations for a Farmer Field School Approach in the Greenbelt of South Sudan Ilse Hoffmann (Team Leader), Lloyd Blum, Lena Kern, Enno Mewes, Richard Oelmann Berlin, December 2012 SLE Publication Series S 253 Editor Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung (SLE) Hessische Straße 1-2 10115 Berlin Tel.: 0049-30-2093 6900 FAX: 0049-30-2093 6904 [email protected] www.sle-berlin.de Editorial Dr. Karin Fiege, SLE Print Zerbe Druck & Werbung Planckstr. 11 16537 Grünheide Distribution SLE Hessische Str. 1-2 10115 Berlin 1. Edition 2012 1-200 Copyright 2012 by SLE ISSN 1433-4585 ISBN 3-936602-57-3 Cover photos Woman farmer of Alotto FFS showing exemples of the benefit of the FFS (Ilse Hoffmann) Foreword I Foreword For 50 years, the Centre for Rural Development (SLE – Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung), Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, trains young professionals for the field of German and international development cooperation. Three-month practical projects conducted on behalf of German and international or- ganisations in development cooperation form an integral part of the one-year post- graduate course. In interdisciplinary teams and under the guidance of an experi- enced team leader, young professionals carry out assignments on innovative future- oriented topics, providing consultant support to the commissioning organisations. In- volving a diverse range of actors in the process is of great importance here, i.e. sur- veys from household level to decision makers and experts at national level.
    [Show full text]
  • HPF 2 RFP Scope of Work
    Request for Proposals Service Providers for 23 lots to Provide Health Services in South Sudan June 2016 Request for Proposals Health Pooled Fund Crown Agents Table of Contents List of Abbreviations (iii) List of Tables (v) Page 1. Section A: Introduction 6 2. Section B: General Conditions 7 2.1 Definitions 7 2.2 Conflict of Interest 7 2.3 Consortium 7 2.4 Substitution of key personnel 8 2.5 Anti-bribery and Corruption 8 2.6 Eligibility 8 2.7 Sanctions and Prohibitions 8 3. Section C: Proposal Preparation and Instructions 9 3.1 Composition of the bidding documents 9 3.2 Tender Lots 10 3.3 Bid Submission 12 3.4 Bidding Language 13 3.5 Cost of bidding 13 3.6 Bid Clarifications 13 3.7 Proposal validity 14 3.8 Cancellation of Tender 14 4. Section D: Bid Evaluation Process and Criteria 14 4.1 Bid Stages 14 4.2 Bid Receipt 14 4.3 Bid Opening and Initial Assessment 14 4.4 Technical Proposal Evaluation 15 4.5 Bid Clarifications 18 4.6 Financial Proposal Evaluation 18 4.7 Weighting and Final Combined Evaluation Score 19 5. Section E: Negotiation and Contract Award 19 5.1 Negotiation 19 5.2 Award of contracts 20 6. Section F: Terms of Reference 20 6.1 Scope of Work 21 6.2 Objective 1: To increase access, use and quality of health services across all levels, particularly for women, children and vulnerable groups 22 6.3 Objective 2: To strengthen the health system under the stewardship of the County Health Departments 28 6.4 Objective 3: To increase access to nutrition services particularly for pregnant women and young children 34 6.5 Ineligible activities 35 6.6 Gender and Social Inclusion 36 i Request for Proposals Health Pooled Fund 6.7 Conflict sensitivity, emergency preparedness and response 37 Crown Agents 6.8 Operational Resilience 38 6.9 Appropriate technology and innovative programming 38 6.10 Lesson learning and information dissemination 39 6.11 Branding and visibility 39 6.12 Monitoring, evaluation and reporting 40 6.13 Management Reviews and Evaluations 41 6.14 Contracting period 43 6.15 Financial allocations 43 7.
    [Show full text]