Baseline Survey and Needs Assessment for Children and Mothers Partnerships (Champs) Project in Nzara County, Western Equatoria State- South Sudan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Baseline Survey and Needs Assessment for Children and Mothers Partnerships (Champs) Project in Nzara County, Western Equatoria State- South Sudan BASELINE SURVEY AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CHILDREN AND MOTHERS PARTNERSHIPS (CHAMPS) PROJECT IN NZARA COUNTY, WESTERN EQUATORIA STATE- SOUTH SUDAN Submitted to CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD Prepared by CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD- SOUTH SUDAN April 2015 1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................................... 2 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVI ATIONS ............................................................................................................. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 2 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODU CTION ................................................................................................................. 18 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................ 18 1.2 CMMB SOUTH SUDAN COUNTRY PROGRAM ............................................................................... 18 1.3 MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH: THE GLOBAL CONTEXT ................................................. 19 1.4 MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH: SOUTH SUDAN COUNTRY CONTEXT ....................... 23 1.5 OBJECTIVES OF THE BASELINE AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT ................................................. 28 1.6 SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................... 30 CHAPTER TWO: DATA CO LLECTION METHODOLOGY ................................................................... 31 2.1 HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ............................................................................................................................. 31 2.1.1 SURVEY SAMPLING FRAME ............................................................................................................. 32 2.1.2 SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION ..................................................................................................... 32 2.1.3 SAMPLING DESIGN ............................................................................................................................... 34 2.1.4 SURVEY ENUMERATOR SELECTION AND TRAINING ........................................................... 35 2.1.5 SURVEY TIMEFRAME AND SUPERVISIONS ............................................................................... 36 2.1.6 SURVEY DATA ENTRY AND ANALYSIS ...................................................................................... 36 2.2 KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEWS (KII) ............................................................................................... 36 2.3 FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS .............................................................................................................. 37 2.4 FACILITY ASSESSMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 38 2.5 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 39 2.6 ETHICAL ISSUES ....................................................................................................................................... 39 CHAPTER THREE: RESULTS .......................................................................................................................... 41 3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION............................................................................................................ 41 3.1 HOUSEHOLD POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS ......................................... 42 3.1.1 HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION ................................................................................................................. 42 3.1.2 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT OF THE HOUSEHOLD POPULATION ............................................ 43 3.1.3 MARITAL STATUS OF RESPONDENTS ................................................................................................ 46 3.1.4 RELIGION OF RESPONDENTS ............................................................................................................... 47 3.1.5 HOUSEHOLD ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................... 47 3.1.6 HOUSEHOLD POSSESSIONS .................................................................................................................. 49 3.1.7 OCCUPATION ........................................................................................................................................... 50 3.1.8 HOUSEHOLD DECISION-MAKING ........................................................................................................ 53 3.2 FERTILITY LEVELS, TRENDS, AND FAMILY PLANNING ........................................................ 54 3.2.1 BIRTH INTERVALS .................................................................................................................................. 55 3.2.2 CURRENT USE OF CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS ................................................................... 58 3.3: MATERNAL HEALTH .............................................................................................................................. 63 3.3.1 ANTENATAL CARE................................................................................................................................ 63 3.3.1.1. ANTENATAL CARE COVERAGE ....................................................................................................... 63 3.3.1.2 NUMBER OF ANTENATAL CARE VISITS ......................................................................................... 65 3.3.1.3 COMPONENTS OF ANTENATAL CARE ............................................................................................. 66 3.3.1.4 TETANUS TOXOID INJECTIONS .................................................................................................. 67 3.3.2. DELIVERY ................................................................................................................................................ 68 3.3.2.1 PLACE OF DELIVERY ........................................................................................................................... 68 3.3.2.2 DELIVERY ASSISTANCE ..................................................................................................................... 70 3.3.3. POSTNATAL CARE ............................................................................................................................... 72 3.4: GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE AND CHILD PROTECTION ......................................................... 74 3.4.1 EARLY CHILD MARRIAGE ................................................................................................................. 75 3.4.2 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ......................................................................................................................... 76 3.4.3 SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND ABUSE .......................................................................................... 78 3.4.4 ECONOMIC ABUSE ................................................................................................................................ 80 3.4.5 CHILD PROTECTION ............................................................................................................................. 82 3.5: CHILD HEALTH ......................................................................................................................................... 84 3.5.1 VACCINATION COVERAGE ............................................................................................................... 84 3.5.2 ACUTE RESPIRATORY INFECTION ................................................................................................ 85 3.5.3 FEVER ......................................................................................................................................................... 87 2 | P a g e 3.5.4 PREVALENCE OF DIARRHEA AMONG CHILDREN .................................................................. 88 3.5.5 KNOWLEDGE OF ORS PACKETS ..................................................................................................... 89 3.6: MATERNAL, NEWBORN AND CHILD NUTRITION ..................................................................... 89 3.6.1. NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF CHILDREN ....................................................................................... 91 3.6.2 BREASTFEEDING AND SUPPLEMENTATION ............................................................................. 93 3.6.2.1 INITIATION OF BREASTFEEDING ..................................................................................................... 93 3.6.2.2 EXCLUSIVE BREASTFEEDING FOR 6 MONTHS ............................................................................. 94 3.6.2.3 COMPLEMENTARY FEEDING IN CHILDREN .................................................................................. 95 3.6.3 MICRONUTRIENT INTAKE AMONG CHILDREN ....................................................................... 98 3.6.4 MICRONUTRIENT INTAKE AMONG MOTHERS ......................................................................... 99 3.7 MALARIA ...................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Yambio Town Road Monitoring South Sudan Displacement Crisis Yambio County, Western Equatoria State, South Sudan August 2018
    Yambio Town Road Monitoring South Sudan Displacement Crisis Yambio County, Western Equatoria State, South Sudan August 2018 Sudan CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY Western Bahr Ethiopia Yambio town is located in Yambio County, Western Equatoria State, near South Sudan’s el Ghazal WWesternarra pEquatoria ARRIVALS TO YAMBIO TOWN C.A.R. Lakes Previous location - Country border with the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Yambio town was the centre ua Demographic3 of significant armed clashes and widespread displacement in 2016, and hosts a large D.R.C. Kenya Country of most recent long term location for arriving HHs: population of internally displaced persons (IDPs) many of whom have started to return home Nagero Uganda as of early 2018. Children 30 % This factsheet provides results from the REACH road monitoring exercise in Yambio town, Main routes of Tambura displacement South Sudan 95 % Yambio County. REACH monitors four bus/car parks in Yambio town to record the arrivals volo Women 39 % and departures of people on a daily basis. Daily data is synthesised into a monthly factsheetCentra l Nzara Central African Republic 3 % to provide an overview of wider movement trends, including push/pull factors and intentions. African DRC 2% The following findings are based on primary data collected between 2 and 30 August 2018, Men 30 % Republic dri 30+39+30t during which 190 departing HHs (378 individuals) and 64 arriving HHs (125 individuals) 95+3+2t Mundri 1 st were recorded, along with 6 HHs (14 individuals) that were transiting through Yambio town. Ezo Ibba Easoft the total arriving HHs expressed the intention to remain in Enumerators interviewed respondents who were arriving in and departing from any of 5 % Yambio town permanently.
    [Show full text]
  • COP 2017 Approval Meeting Outbrief - South Sudan
    COP 2017 Approval Meeting Outbrief - South Sudan 29 APRIL 2017 Johannesburg, South Africa DISPLACEMENT FOOD INSECURITY December 2016 December 2016 >3M PEOPLE Progress on COP16 Implementation 3 South Sudan PLHIV and PEPFAR ART Coverage, FY16 A New Era of Accountability, Transparency, and Solidarity to Accelerate IMPACT4 PLHIV & Unmet Need across PEPFAR-Supported SNUs by end of SAPR FY17 44% of all PLHIV in South Sudan are in PEPFAR-supported SNUs in Equatoria: 25% of all PLHIV in South Sudan are in PEPFAR-supported Scale-Up Aggressive SNUs 20% of PLHIV in Scale-Up NATIONAL PLHIV ON ART 10% Aggressive on ART 12% of PLHIV in Sustained SNUs on ART 12000 100% 100% 100% 120% 94% 90% 93% 90% 94% 95% 91% 10000 86% 81% 84% 100% 8000 67% 80% 53% 6000 47% 60% No. of PLHIV ofNo. 4000 40% 2000 20% 0 0% Juba Ezo Yambio Magwi Nzara Yei KajoKeji Tambura Torit Maridi Morobo Lainya Kapoeta Mundri Mundri Ibba County County County County County County County County County County County County South West East County Current on ART Unmet Need % Unmet Need County County County All PEPFAR FY 2017 Q2 program results and achievements included within this presentation were based upon preliminary reporting and may differ from the final submission results. Final FY 2017 Q2 results, as well as past and future quarterly and annual PEPFAR program results, can be accessed on the PEPFAR Dashboard at http://data.pepfar.net. A New Era of Accountability, Transparency, and Solidarity to Accelerate IMPACT South Sudan COP15 (FY16) and COP16 (FY17) Implementation FY16 APR FY17
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Country Operational Plan (COP)
    FY 2015 South Sudan Country Operational Plan (COP) The following elements included in this document, in addition to “Budget and Target Reports” posted separately on www.PEPFAR.gov, reflect the approved FY 2015 COP for South Sudan. 1) FY 2015 COP Strategic Development Summary (SDS) narrative communicates the epidemiologic and country/regional context; methods used for programmatic design; findings of integrated data analysis; and strategic direction for the investments and programs. Note that PEPFAR summary targets discussed within the SDS were accurate as of COP approval and may have been adjusted as site- specific targets were finalized. See the “COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit” sheets that follow for final approved targets. 2) COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit includes approved COP 15 targets (targets to be achieved by September 30, 2016). As noted, these may differ from targets embedded within the SDS narrative document and reflect final approved targets. Approved FY 2015 COP budgets by mechanism and program area, and summary targets are posted as a separate document on www.PEPFAR.gov in the “FY 2015 Country Operational Plan Budget and Target Report.” South Sudan Country/Regional Operational Plan (COP/ROP) 2015 Strategic Direction Summary August 27, 2015 Table of Contents Goal Statement 1.0 Epidemic, Response, and Program Context 1.1 Summary statistics, disease burden and epidemic profile 1.2 Investment profile 1.3 Sustainability Profile 1.4 Alignment of PEPFAR investments geographically to burden of disease 1.5 Stakeholder engagement
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Overview: Western Equatoria State, South Sudan January - March 2020
    Situation Overview: Western Equatoria State, South Sudan January - March 2020 Introduction Map 1: REACH assessment coverage of Western Equatoria state, January (A), February (B) and METHODOLOGY Through the first quarter of 2020, humanitarian March (C) 2020 A B To provide an overview of the situation in hard- needs in Western Equatoria State (WES) were to-reach areas of Western Equatoria, REACH impacted by displacement, insecurity, bush uses primary data from key informants who fires and emerging COVID-19 restrictions. have recently arrived from, recently visited, or Information remains critical for an informed receive regular information from a settlement response, yet movement restrictions due to the 0 - 4.9% or “Area of Knowledge” (AoK). Information for this report was collected from key informants in COVID-19 measures have limited humanitarian 5 - 10% access to many areas across the region. Yambio and Maridi towns in Western Equatoria 11 - 20% C State in January, February and March 2020. To inform humanitarian actors working outside In-depth interviews on humanitarian needs 21 - 50% formal settlement sites, REACH has conducted were conducted throughout the month using assessments of hard-to-reach areas in South 51 - 100% a structured survey tool. After data collection Sudan since December 2015. Data is collected was completed, all data was aggregated at on a monthly basis through interviews with key Assessed settlement settlement level, and settlements were assigned informants (KIs) with knowledge of a settlement the modal or most credible response. When no and triangulated with focus group discussions # of key informant interviews conducted: 611 consensus could be found for a settlement, that (FGDs).
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) Report — Lakes State, Western and Eastern Equatoria
    South Sudan water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) Report — Lakes State, Western and Eastern Equatoria January 2021 South Sudan WASH Report — Lakes State, Western and Eastern Equatoria Cover photo credit: Gatbel Chany, 2021 About REACH REACH facilitates the development of information tools and products that enhance the capacity of aid actors to make evidence-based decisions in emergency, recovery and development contexts. The methodologies used by REACH include primary data collection and in-depth analysis, and all activities are conducted through inter-agency aid coordination mechanisms. REACH is a joint initiative of IMPACT Initiatives, ACTED and the United Nations Institute for Training and Research - Operational Satellite Applications Programme (UNITAR-UNOSAT). For more information please visit our website: www.reach-initiative.org. You can contact us directly at: geneva@reach- initiative.org and follow us on Twitter @REACH_info. 1 South Sudan WASH Report — Lakes State, Western and Eastern Equatoria CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 3 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................................... 4 FINDINGS .................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Access to water ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Primary Justice in South Sudan Challenges, Concerns, and Elements That Work
    Exploring Primary Justice in South Sudan Challenges, concerns, and elements that work Bruno Braak Exploring Primary Justice in South Sudan – Challenges, concerns, and elements that work Bruno Braak Colophon Exploring Primary Justice in South Sudan – Challenges, concerns, and elements that work. South Sudan country report of the project ‘Supporting Primary Justice in Insecure Contexts: South Sudan and Afghanistan’. This project was funded by NWO-WOTRO in collaboration with the Knowledge Platform on Security and Rule of Law. Carried out by: Van Vollenhoven Institute for Law, Governance, and Society, and Cordaid in cooperation with the Justice and Peace Commission of the Catholic Diocese of Tombura-Yambio Authors Bruno Braak Design: UFB Grafimedia, Leiden © 2016 VVI / Authors All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this report may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author(s) of the report. The views expressed and analysis put forward in this report are entirely those of the author(s) and cannot be attributed to organizations involved in the project or its donors. Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 Legislative framework ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010
    Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 Southern Sudan 2010 for Yearbook Statistical Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation P.O. Box 137, Juba. Tel: +249 811 823 835 Email: [email protected], [email protected] Website: www.ssccse.org Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation P.O. Box 137, Juba. Tel: +249 811 823 835 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Website: www.ssccse.org Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 Table Of Contents I Chairperson’s Foreword xi II SSCCSE:Functions and Organisation xii III Geographical Overview (Maps) 1 IV Population and Demography 7 V Household Characteristics and Basic Services 33 VI Education 47 VII Health 77 VIII Agriculture, Food Security and Forestry 85 IX Displacement 101 X Demining 105 XI Political Representation 109 XII International Relations 117 XIII Consumption and Poverty 121 XIV Telecommunications 133 XV Businesses and Cooperatives 139 XVI Money, Banking and Credit 145 XVII Government Finance 153 Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 | iii Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2010 List Of Tables, Maps and Graphs III Geographical Overview (Maps) 1 Overview of States 2 2 Overview of States and Counties 2 3 Major Motorable Roads 3 4 Major Operational Airfields 3 5 Major Rivers and Water Bodies 4 6 Southern Sudan Topography 4 7 Land Use in Southern Sudan 5 8 Avg Rainfall in Southern Sudan 5 9 Agro Climatic Zones 6 IV Population and Demography List10 Of TablesMap: Total Population 8 11 Population by State and Sex.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of SOUTH SUDAN
    For Humanitarian Purposes Only Reference Map The Republic of SOUTH SUDAN Production date: 15 June 2017 24°0'0"E 25°0'0"E 26°0'0"E 27°0'0"E 28°0'0"E 29°0'0"E 30°0'0"E 31°0'0"E 32°0'0"E 33°0'0"E 34°0'0"E 35°0'0"E 36°0'0"E 37°0'0"E Kalu Shearia Shaqq Al Gawa Garoula ÆÖ Redis, Abu Zabad Kashafa, Jouri Dauro IDP camps "Emtitode " Ghubaysh Ayaal-Edris Saferi "Neem ÖÆ Baddal PoC N ""Wounthau Delling " Nyala Remela "Dukduk 0 "Tayyibah ' Muhajiriya Saheib Hai Jebeleen" "Halaka 0 R K e Mabrouka o Habila n ° s ×Æ Tono k t - i Spontaneous settlement 2 Abu Shalaya "Wun Ghir " 1 Dalami Rashad El Roseires ² "Wunchol Dago Ed Damazine ÖÆ Baraka Wad Hassib " Keikei "Kumsur Rom " Refugee camp Um Boim El Fula " Saraya Boma Manyo County Omar" Solwong Murr Renk Girru Um La`ota Abu Ajura Abu Karaynka Settlements Al Marwahah Faki Ibrahim "Chamidi-A Umm Heitan "Abayok Abu Jubaiha \ Gettin o Ed Daein R . D l e i b Country capital Lagawa "Alek "Bangjang Abu Tabanu El Buheimer Renk County "Lon" gtem " Gereida " Molbok Ktpiol State capital Heiban Barbari Kubbi " Shergeila Tullus Jidad County capital N " "Jalhak " Miri Juwa Kadugli Wun Atem 0 ' " Injbara 0 Sibdu ° Wad Rizq Far` Al Habil Principal town Manang" 1 Al Malwi t lu 1 e Harazah Ruqay M R Umm Dorain Kologi - Mumallah k . n Keilak " e S Anunbul R a Buram ng " e i Sudan r Geissan Village Ab u G A e t b Finote Selam h i S a m a i h l - a d a e w - R .
    [Show full text]
  • CMMB SOUTH SUDAN PROFILE Children and Mothers’ Partnerships, Western Equatoria State
    CMMB SOUTH SUDAN PROFILE Children and Mothers’ Partnerships, Western Equatoria State June 2015 CMMB 100 Wall Street, 9th Floor New York, NY 10005 www.cmmb.org SOUTH SUDAN PROFILE: CHILDREN AND MOTHERS’ PARTNERSHIPS (CHAMPS), WESTERN EQUATORIA STATE Introduction Catholic Medical Mission Board has launched CHAMPS—a 15-year, comprehensive initiative to target the most prevalent and fundamental causes of mortality and morbidity among women and children in targeted communities around the world. One of these communities is Nzara County, an impoverished, remote area in South Sudan’s Western Equatoria State (WES) that has a population of roughly 72,000 and, after years of civil war and other violence, suffers from a host of major public health problems. These difficulties are highlighted by numerous disturbing statistics, as WES suffers from one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the world, as well as post-natal care. CMMB recently conducted an extensive assessment of health-related needs in Nzara, including a study of health facilities in Nzara as well as the surrounding area, such as Yambio State Hospital, which is in neighboring Yambio County, is the primary referral hospital for Nzara County, and serves a catchment area of 187,000 people. The assessment also included a household survey questionnaire, key informant/stakeholder interviews, and focus groups, through which the community identified key health issues. The assessment highlighted serious problems with respect to services for pregnant women, HIV, public education, clean water, gender-based violence, child protection, and nutrition. These problems are systemic in nature, and cannot be solved through discrete, isolated interventions; rather, a multi-faceted approach is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for a Farmer Field School Approach in the Greenbelt of South Sudan
    SLE Publication Series – S253 SLE – Postgraduate Studies on International Cooperation Study commissioned by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Achieving Food Security in a Post Conflict Context Recommendations for a Farmer Field School Approach in the Greenbelt of South Sudan Ilse Hoffmann (Team Leader), Lloyd Blum, Lena Kern, Enno Mewes, Richard Oelmann Berlin, December 2012 SLE Publication Series S 253 Editor Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung (SLE) Hessische Straße 1-2 10115 Berlin Tel.: 0049-30-2093 6900 FAX: 0049-30-2093 6904 [email protected] www.sle-berlin.de Editorial Dr. Karin Fiege, SLE Print Zerbe Druck & Werbung Planckstr. 11 16537 Grünheide Distribution SLE Hessische Str. 1-2 10115 Berlin 1. Edition 2012 1-200 Copyright 2012 by SLE ISSN 1433-4585 ISBN 3-936602-57-3 Cover photos Woman farmer of Alotto FFS showing exemples of the benefit of the FFS (Ilse Hoffmann) Foreword I Foreword For 50 years, the Centre for Rural Development (SLE – Seminar für Ländliche Entwicklung), Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, trains young professionals for the field of German and international development cooperation. Three-month practical projects conducted on behalf of German and international or- ganisations in development cooperation form an integral part of the one-year post- graduate course. In interdisciplinary teams and under the guidance of an experi- enced team leader, young professionals carry out assignments on innovative future- oriented topics, providing consultant support to the commissioning organisations. In- volving a diverse range of actors in the process is of great importance here, i.e. sur- veys from household level to decision makers and experts at national level.
    [Show full text]
  • HPF 2 RFP Scope of Work
    Request for Proposals Service Providers for 23 lots to Provide Health Services in South Sudan June 2016 Request for Proposals Health Pooled Fund Crown Agents Table of Contents List of Abbreviations (iii) List of Tables (v) Page 1. Section A: Introduction 6 2. Section B: General Conditions 7 2.1 Definitions 7 2.2 Conflict of Interest 7 2.3 Consortium 7 2.4 Substitution of key personnel 8 2.5 Anti-bribery and Corruption 8 2.6 Eligibility 8 2.7 Sanctions and Prohibitions 8 3. Section C: Proposal Preparation and Instructions 9 3.1 Composition of the bidding documents 9 3.2 Tender Lots 10 3.3 Bid Submission 12 3.4 Bidding Language 13 3.5 Cost of bidding 13 3.6 Bid Clarifications 13 3.7 Proposal validity 14 3.8 Cancellation of Tender 14 4. Section D: Bid Evaluation Process and Criteria 14 4.1 Bid Stages 14 4.2 Bid Receipt 14 4.3 Bid Opening and Initial Assessment 14 4.4 Technical Proposal Evaluation 15 4.5 Bid Clarifications 18 4.6 Financial Proposal Evaluation 18 4.7 Weighting and Final Combined Evaluation Score 19 5. Section E: Negotiation and Contract Award 19 5.1 Negotiation 19 5.2 Award of contracts 20 6. Section F: Terms of Reference 20 6.1 Scope of Work 21 6.2 Objective 1: To increase access, use and quality of health services across all levels, particularly for women, children and vulnerable groups 22 6.3 Objective 2: To strengthen the health system under the stewardship of the County Health Departments 28 6.4 Objective 3: To increase access to nutrition services particularly for pregnant women and young children 34 6.5 Ineligible activities 35 6.6 Gender and Social Inclusion 36 i Request for Proposals Health Pooled Fund 6.7 Conflict sensitivity, emergency preparedness and response 37 Crown Agents 6.8 Operational Resilience 38 6.9 Appropriate technology and innovative programming 38 6.10 Lesson learning and information dissemination 39 6.11 Branding and visibility 39 6.12 Monitoring, evaluation and reporting 40 6.13 Management Reviews and Evaluations 41 6.14 Contracting period 43 6.15 Financial allocations 43 7.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FOOD, AGRIBUSINESS and RURAL MARKETS (FARM) PROJECT Final Project Report
    THE FOOD, AGRIBUSINESS AND RURAL MARKETS (FARM) PROJECT Final Project Report Contract No.: EDH-1-00-05-00005-00, Task Order No. 16 July 2015 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Abt Associates Inc. Recommended Citation: Food, Agribusiness and Rural Markets Project. “Final Project Report.” Prepared by Abt Associates Inc., Bethesda, MD, July 2015. Abt Associates Inc. 1 4550 Montgomery Avenue 1 Suite 800 North 1 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 1 T. 301.347.5000 1 F. 301.913.9061 1 www.abtassociates.com With: ACDI/VOCA Action Africa Help International Risk and Security Management Consulting THE FOOD, AGRIBUSINESS, AND RURAL MARKETS (FARM) PROJECT Final Project Report Contract No. I-00-05-00005-00, Task Order No. 16 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................vii 1 Brief Contextual Review ....................................................................................................... 1 2 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]