Analysis of the Metaphase Chromosome Karyotypes in Imaginal Discs of Aedes Communis, Ae. Punctor, Ae. Intrudens, and Ae. Rossicus (Diptera: Culicidae) Mosquitoes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
insects Article Analysis of the Metaphase Chromosome Karyotypes in Imaginal Discs of Aedes communis, Ae. punctor, Ae. intrudens, and Ae. rossicus (Diptera: Culicidae) Mosquitoes Svetlana S. Alekseeva 1,2,* , Yulia V. Andreeva 1, Irina E. Wasserlauf 1, Anuarbek K. Sibataev 1 and Vladimir N. Stegniy 1 1 Laboratory of Evolution Cytogenetics, Tomsk State University, Lenin st, 36, Tomsk 634050, Russia; [email protected] (Y.V.A.); [email protected] (I.E.W.); [email protected] (A.K.S.); [email protected] (V.N.S.) 2 Laboratory of Evolutionary Genomics of Insects, the Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Lavrentiev ave., 10, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-913-889-92-89 Received: 11 December 2019; Accepted: 16 January 2020; Published: 19 January 2020 Abstract: In this study, cytogenetic analysis of the metaphase chromosomes from imaginal discs of Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes—Aedes communis, Ae. punctor, Ae. intrudens, and Ae. rossicus—was performed. The patterns of C-banding and DAPI staining of the heteroсhromatin and the length of the chromosomes demonstrate species specificity. In particular, the Ae. punctor chromosomes are the shortest compared with Ae. communis, Ae. intrudens, and Ae. rossicus, and they also carry additional C and DAPI bands in intercalary regions. The Ae. intrudens chromosomes are the longest, they have pericentromeric C bands, and they almost lack any DAPI bands near the centromere of chromosome 3 versus Ae. communis, which has the largest pericentromeric DAPI blocks in all three chromosome pairs. Ae. rossicus also possesses DAPI bands in the centromeric regions of all chromosomes, but their staining is weaker compared with those of Ae. communis. Therefore, the analysis of karyotypes is a tool for species-level identification of these mosquitoes. Keywords: mosquitoes; Culicidae; Aedes; C-banding; DAPI; mitotic chromosomes; imaginal discs 1. Introduction The Aedes mosquitoes are vectors of various diseases, determining the relevance of corresponding studies. In particular, West Nile virus, first isolated in 1937 in Uganda, is now more widespread and currently in Russia (Volgograd, Astrakhan, and Rostov oblasts and Krasnodar Krai). In nature, this virus is transmitted as follows: bird mosquito another vertebrate [1]. Dengue fever, widespread $ ! in regions with a tropical and subtropical climate, was discovered on Madeira Island and in several southern regions of Europe [2]. Zika virus, earlier prevalent in African and Asian countries, currently causes outbreaks in America [3]. Dirofilariasis is characteristic of regions with a humid and hot climate; however, an increase in dirofilariasis morbidity has recently been observed in countries for which it was previously rather untypical [4,5]. Ae. communis, Ae. punctor, Ae. cinereus, Culex pipiens, and some other species activity cycles have been studied in Sweden because of the transmission of Ockelbo disease (caused by Sindbis virus) and tularaemia in Sweden [6]. Aedes mosquitoes are vectors of these and many other diseases [2,7–10]. Mosquitoes from the genus Aedes have been distributed all over the world from their original habitat. Currently, invasive species of Aedes mosquitoes—Ae. albopictus, Ae. japonicus, Ae. atropalpus, Insects 2020, 11, 63; doi:10.3390/insects11010063 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects Insects 2020, 11, 63 2 of 9 Ae. koreicus, and Ae. aegypti [11–19]—are being ever more frequently discovered in Europe and other regions of the world. Ae. rossicus was found close to the Arctic circle in northern Sweden [20]. Therefore, prediction of the epidemiological threat and its control requires knowledge about the species composition of the corresponding mosquito vectors. A more precise species-level identification of mosquitoes requires a set of different methods. Morphological and molecular methods are sometimes not enough for some species of mosquitoes from the Aedes genus. This is a reason to perform a karyotype analysis for Aedes mosquitoes. As is known, the amount and distribution pattern of heterochromatin in chromosomes is among the species-specific characteristics for most plants and animals [21]; thus, heterochromatin is an important object in genomic studies of individual organisms [22]. For example, a comparative karyotype analysis of the flies Lucilia cluvia and L. sericata detected differences in the chromatin structure by C-banding and other staining types [23]. A karyotype analysis of four species—Triceratopyga calliphoroides, L. porphyrina, Chrysomya pinguis, and Xenocalliphora hortona—demonstrated differences in sex chromosomes and similarity in autosomes [24]. A study of the amount and distribution of heterochromatin on the chromosomes of several groups of closely related species (complexes of Drosophila, Anopheles, and Bactrocera)[25] demonstrated that a quantitative assay of heterochromatin in mitotic chromosomes can be used for the identification of cryptic species. Differences in the heterochromatin amount and localization have been demonstrated for two sibling species, Anopheles atroparvus and An. labranchiae [26]. Previously, we performed a comparative analysis of the metaphase chromosomes in imaginal discs of the mosquito species Ae. excrucians, Ae. behningi, and Ae. euedes and showed that heterochromatin patterns of chromosomes represent one of the characteristics for the species-level identification of mosquitoes [27]. The previous karyotype analysis involved Ae. excrucians, Ae. behningi, and Ae. euedes mosquitoes collected in the Tomsk region (south of Western Siberia, Russia), which houses 21 Aedes mosquito species [28], and which are also widely abundant in other countries (http://www.mosquitocatalog.org/default.aspx). This (current) analysis includes four more species (Ae. communis, Ae. punctor, Ae. intrudens, and Ae. rossicus) from the Aedes genus in the Tomsk region (south of Western Siberia, Russia). We collected them in May–June (2019) and performed a chromosome analysis. The goal of this work was to analyze the karyotypes of Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes (Ae. communis, Ae. punctor, Ae. intrudens, and Ae. rossicus) in order to find out if species-specific features exist in their metaphase chromosomes. 2. Materials and Methods The 4th instar larvae of Ae. communis, Ae. punctor, Ae. intrudens, and Ae. rossicus examined in this work were sampled in water bodies of the Tomsk region. Morphological species-level identification of the sampled larvae was conducted using MBS-12 (Russia) and Stemi 2000-C (Carl Zeiss, Germany) stereo microscopes, according to the conventional descriptions and keys [29–31]. The nomenclature is given according to the Systematic Catalog of Culicidae (http://mosquitocatalog.org/default.aspx). Larvae were fixed with Carnoy’s solution (ethanol to glacial acetic acid, 3:1). Metaphase plates of dividing imaginal disc cells of the early 4th instar larvae were examined. The structure of metaphase chromosomes was assayed using lacto-aceto-orcein staining [32], C-banding, and DAPI staining [33]. 2.1. Lacto-Aceto-Orcein Staining Imaginal discs were dissected from Ae. behningi, Ae. euedes, and Ae. excrucians larvae fixed with Carnoy’s solution, stained in a drop of lacto-aceto-orcein dye for 15 min, and washed in 45% acetic acid. The stained imaginal discs were covered with a cover glass to get squash preparations by tapping on the cover glass. The squash preparations were examined using a Zeiss Axioimager A1 (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) light microscope. Insects 2020, 11, 63 3 of 9 2.2. DAPI Staining For this purpose, imaginal discs were isolated from mosquito larvae in a drop of Carnoy’s solution, transferred to a drop of 45% acetic acid, covered with a cover glass, and squashed. The cover glass was removed using liquid nitrogen and the preparations were dehydrated by successive treatment with alcohols (50%, 70%, and 96%; 5 min each). A drop of DAPI (a fluorescent dye) was placed onto air-dried preparations, which were then covered with a cover glass. The resulting slides with DAPI-stained metaphase chromosomes were examined using a Zeiss Axioimager Z1 (Zeiss, Germany) fluorescence microscope. 2.3. C-Banding C-banding was performed using the pre-staining of chromosome preparations with Ba(ОН)2. The air-dried preparations of mosquito imaginal discs were incubated in 0.2 M HCl at room temperature for 1 h and placed in fresh 5% barium hydroxide solution at 50 ◦C for 10–15 min. Then, the preparations were washed and incubated in 2 SSC buffer at 60 C for 1 h. The resulting slides were washed, × ◦ stained with 4% Giemsa solution for 1.5 h, and examined using a Zeiss Axioimager A1 (Zeiss, Germany) microscope. 2.4. Statistical Analysis The chromosomes were identified based on the ratio of their arms and lengths, according to the relevant chromosome classification [34]. The lengths of chromosomes and their arms were measured using the ImageJ program. The centromeric index was calculated as Jc = p/(p + q), where p is the short chromosome arm and q is the long arm. The relative chromosome length was calculated as Length of chromosome Lr = 100%, Total length of all chromosomes × where Lr is the relative chromosome length (%). Over 50 metaphase plates were examined for each species and 30 metaphase plates with the same degrees of condensation were selected for analysis. The p value was calculated in the Statistica 10 program for each chromosome of each species. 3. Results Karyotype analysis of the metaphase