Gender, Crisis and the Conservation of Spain in the Early Seventeenth Century
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Assuming Roles: Gender, Crisis and the Conservation of Spain in the Early Seventeenth Century By Copyright 2010 Ryan Christopher Gaston Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson: Professor Luis Corteguera ________________________________ Professor Hannah Britton ________________________________ Professor Elizabeth Kuznesof ________________________________ Professor Eve Levin ________________________________ Co-Chairperson: Professor Marta Vicente Date Defended: December 3, 2010 i The Dissertation Committee for Ryan Christopher Gaston certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Assuming Roles: Gender, Crisis and the Conservation of Spain in the Early Seventeenth Century ________________________________ Chairperson: Professor Luis Corteguera ________________________________ Co-Chairperson: Professor Marta Vicente Date approved: December 3, 2010 ii Abstract: Fearful that recent military losses and continued economic difficulties indicated the decline of their once powerful state, Spanish reformers and royal officials during the first quarter of the seventeenth century dedicated themselves to finding reform programs to conserve Spain and its monarchy. They were led by the Junta Grande de Reformación, a unique committee formed by the monarchy to rehabilitate what many saw as the central factor in Spain’s condition: faltering popular customs (costumbres). Reformers reached the conclusion that Spanish society had grown “effeminate,” exchanging the strength and virility of Spain’s successful empire for widespread foppishness and idleness. Focused on the efforts to reform customs during this era and the gendered rhetoric and notions that filled related reform writings, this dissertation seeks to understand how gender shaped the policies intended to rehabilitate popular conduct. It shows that these representations of gender revealed not only reformers’ understandings of Spain’s failing empire and diminished world power, but also the unique gender assumptions that gave rise to the reform plans proposed and enacted to stave off decline. Complaints of widespread effeminacy betrayed the monarchy’s disdain for allegedly self-interested conduct, which royal officials felt had displaced the empire’s initial commitment to king, community and the established social order. These gendered criticisms also pointed to a set of virtues, which stressed activity, productivity, duty and other qualities associated with idealized, manly conduct. The models of productive merchants or martially trained nobles offered by reformers met the needs of the state, but also conveyed a sense of balance and order that underpinned the contemporary understanding of gender and reinforced the roles Spaniards needed to fill to conserve Spain. iii Acknowledgements: The development of this dissertation would not have been possible without the assistance of many. Funding for archival research for this project came from the Harry S. Truman Foundation, and the Latin American Studies Program and the Office for Graduate Research and Studies both at the University of Kansas. I am grateful to them and to the Hall Center for the Humanities for granting me additional funding and the opportunity to present my material in a joint meeting of their Early Modern and Latin American Seminars. I also owe a debt of gratitude to the Institute for International Education and the Spanish Fulbright Commission for allowing me to undertake archival investigations during the 2007-2008 academic year. I would like to extend thanks to James Amelang for his guidance during my time in Spain, and to him and María José del Río Barredo for including me in the Seminario de Historia Culural. Of course, my colleagues and mentors at the University of Kansas have been invaluable. John Schneiderwind and Karenbeth Zacharias graciously took time from their own projects to provide comments, corrections, and insights. My appreciation also goes to the members of my dissertation committee (Hannah Britton, Betsy Kuznesof and Eve Levin) for their support and guidance, and of course to Luis Corteguera and Marta Vicente for their unceasing and generous direction of this project and my graduate formation. Finally, I would like to thank my wife Emily for embarking on this journey with me, and showing me the kindness and patience without which this project and degree would never have been completed. iv Contents Acceptance Page ii Abstract iii Acknowledgements iv Chapter 1 Introduction: Assuming Roles 1 Chapter 2 Revisiting Rome, Reviving Virtue 22 La Mudanza: The Shift in Customs 24 Selecting an Efficacious Policy 36 Revisiting the Censura 42 Reviving the Censura 51 Conclusion 63 Chapter 3 Foreign Goods and Common Good 66 Restoring “industry” 68 Trade Winds of War 78 Good Fathers, Good Governance 86 Conclusion 98 Chapter 4 Farmers and Families 101 The Question of Depopulation 102 From Court to Countryside 105 A Natural(ized) Addition 128 Making Fathers and Sons 132 Conclusion 141 Chapter 5 All the King’s Men 144 Defining Nobility 146 The Reales Estudios 150 (En)gendering a Rebuttal 163 The Academies 166 Conclusion 178 Chapter 6 Conclusion: Breaking with Customs 181 Bibliography 192 v Chapter 1 – Assuming Roles –An Introduction In the 1620s, the Spanish monarchy was at a crossroads. Its several military losses suggested that Spanish imperial hegemony had peaked or even begun to decline. In 1588 Spain suffered the devastating defeat of its Armada at the hands of the English navy. Despite decades of fighting against a modest Dutch military, the king’s troops had also failed to regain control of the rebellious provinces of the Netherlands, forcing Madrid to grant the Dutch Republic its independence. Since the 1590s the monarchy had also suffered drastic losses in its economy and population. Burdened by the cost of prolonged warfare and suffering from a decreased importation of silver from the Americas, the royal treasury had run out of money to pay debts and fund vital projects. The monarchy could only declare bankruptcy to escape its obligations, a strategy it employed multiple times during this period. Meanwhile, the population of Spain, especially in its central kingdom of Castile, seemed to be dropping. Whether affected by plague, migration or other possible causes of depopulation, Spain’s rural regions and trades had been abandoned and were in disrepair. In all, the Spanish monarchy and its empire seemed to be in grave danger of collapse. Despite the bleak circumstances, between the final years of the reign of Philip III, who died in 1621, and the early rule of his son Philip IV (1621-1665) many still believed possible the arrest of a decline and reversal of the monarchy’s fortunes. Along with reformers from all backgrounds – collectively known as arbitristas for their creation of reform schemes called arbitrios – top officials partook in a profound introspection, considering all aspects of Spanish life as potential sources of decline. 1 In 1619, the Consejo de Castilla, the monarchy’s highest council, analyzed the troubled state of affairs in Spain at the behest of Philip III. After months of deliberation the Council submitted its report (consulta) to the king in January 1620. It asserted that Spaniards had lost “the old, natural virtue of this crown.” Explaining further, the council averred that the “presumption and perspective that should govern behavior is in decline [such that Spaniards] forget their obligation, their thoughts are muddled and effeminate, resulting in idleness and sloth in life…a lack of spirit in the king’s subjects, and abandonment of work and other noble exercises appropriate to their station.” Spain, as they concluded, faced collapse “not only because it is without a spine, by which it conserves itself, that being men that look and act like men, but also because with their vices and disorder they destroy it.”1 The Council’s depiction of Spain’s situation represented well the era’s reform writings. Through its consulta, it claimed that Spaniards had experienced a shift in customs or conduct (costumbres). Council members cited the neglect of obligations to king and kingdom, and the deterioration of bonds between Spaniards, their communities and their monarch as proof. Most notably, it couched this loss of past virtue in gendered 1 The entire passage reads: “Envilecense los naturales y degeneran del valor antiguo y propio de esta Corona…Declina la presunción, y punto que había de gobernar las acciones, olvidar [sic] su obligación, entorpecen y afeminan los pensamientos, y de todo junto resulta ociosidad y torpeza en la vida…poquedad en los sujetos, y hacen que huya la ocupación y ejercicios nobles, y debidos de su estado, y que sean inútiles para cuantas ocasiones se puedan ofrecer; finalmente ocasionan la ruina de la República, no sólo porque en los efectos está sin el nervio, con que se conserva, que son hombres que lo parezcan y sean, sino también porque con sus vicios y desordenes la estragan, con grande deservicio de Dios nuestro Señor y de Vuestra Majestad”; Consulta de Consejo Real a Felipe IV, January 9, 1620 in Ángel González Palencia, La Junta de Reformación: Documentos procedentes del Archivo Histórico Nacional y del General de Simancas, 1618-1625 (Valladolid: Academia de Estudios Histórico-Sociales de Valladolid, 1932), 35-36. For more analysis of this passage as