Diversity and Evolution of Caryophyllids

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diversity and Evolution of Caryophyllids Caryophyllids What are caryophyllids? Diversity and Evolution • First of the core eudicots we will examine: Caryophyllids, of Caryophyllids Rosids, Asterids core eudicots . carnations, cacti, chenopods . • = order Caryophyllales • APG III in 2009 places caryophyllids as sister lineage to the asterids – but probably dates back to 110-100 mya Caryophyllids Caryophyllids What are caryophyllids? What are caryophyllids? • 34 families & 11,155 species = • Exhibit unusual adaptations to “stressful” 6% of eudicot diversity environments — desert or arid regions: high salt, low water, xerophytes • Unusual (!) group of families core eudicots not all previously thought to form a natural order • Share one character? sepals only - “petals” if present appear to be of staminal origin saltbush- Amaranthaceae cacti- Cactaceae 1 Caryophyllids Caryophyllids What are caryophyllids? What are caryophyllids? • Exhibit unusual adaptations to “stressful” • Exhibit unusual adaptations to “stressful” environments — salt marshes, halophytes environments — alpine, tundra, cushion plants glasswort- Amaranthaceae chickweed- Caryophyllaceae spring-beauty- Montiaceae Caryophyllids Caryophyllids What are caryophyllids? What are caryophyllids? • “new” (unplaced) members to the group • “new” (unplaced) members to the group include desert families include desert families Simmondsia chinensis jojoba Frankenia laevis Simmondsiaceae Frankeniaceae Sonoran Desert endemic Canary Islands 2 Caryophyllids Caryophyllids What are caryophyllids? What are caryophyllids? • “new” (unplaced) members to the group • “new” (unplaced) members to the group include desert families include desert families Tamarix - tamarisk Halophytum Tamaricaceae Halophytaceae Caryophyllids Caryophyllids Suite of morphological and/or physiological What are caryophyllids? adaptations for life in the arid world - succulence, no • troublesome “weeds” leaves, C4 and CAM photosynthesis, salt excretion C4 and Crassulacean Acid Metabolism Tamarix - tamarisk Gypsophila - baby’s-breath 3 Caryophyllids What are caryophyllids? • some, but not all, of the carnivorous plants - low N Sundews - Droseraceae New Phytologist Research 847 variable 12 (mean annual precipitation) showed a comparatively Climate occupancy reconstruction results consistent pattern of relatively dry to intermediately wet clades We performed climate occupancy ancestral reconstruction anal- throughout the group. Indeed, only a few clades inhabiting wet yses on the phylogeny of 2843 taxa that included taxa with at ecosystems (in this case, the wet tropics) exist in the Caryophyl- least three sampled geographic coordinates (Figs 1–3). We con- lales, specifically small groups within the carnivorous clade, the ducted these analyses for visualization and for comparison with phytolaccoids, early-diverging Polygonaceae, and other small diversification and WGD results (see later). Results for individ- groups throughout the Caryophyllales. The principal compo- ual bioclimatic variables and principal components can be nent loadings are presented in Figs 2 and S5. Principal compo- found in Figs S2–S4. Bioclimatic variable 1 (mean annual tem- nent 1 (PCA1) showed significant differentiation throughout perature, Fig. 1) showed that there are several strong phyloge- the Caryophyllales, as, for example, early-diverging Polygo- • why this incredible diversity – ecology, physiology, habit, color? netic patterns of clades with preferences for colder or warmerNepenthesnaceae vs the– restAsian of Polygonaceae, pitcher early plant diverging Caryophyl- regions. For example, Polygonaceae, Caryophyllaceae, and laceae vs the rest of Caryophyllaceae, phytolaccoids vs Montiaceae each are dominated by taxa with preferences for Aizoaceae, and Portulacineae + relatives vs Cactaceae, to name a cold environments, although each also contains early-diverging few. These results generally reflect the extensive ecological diver- taxa with preferences for warm environments. By contrast, taxa sification throughout the group. They also reflect significant inhabiting warm environments predominate in Cactaceae, diversification in the temperate regions of the world, especially Amaranthaceae, Aizoaceae, the carnivorous clade (Droseraceae, within the Caryophyllaceae and Polygonaceae, contrasted with Drosophyllaceae, Nepenthaceae, Ancistrocladaceae, Dioncophyl- extensive diversification in the succulent lineages (especially laceae), and the phytolaccoid clade (Nyctaginaceae, Phytolac- Aizoaceae and Cactaceae) found in relatively dry and warm caceae, Petiveriaceae, Sarcobataceae, and Agdestis). Bioclimatic environments. Amaranthaceae 5,x v Caryophyllids Polygonaceae u t s Caryophyllid clade ff • examine all carnivorous plants r w 6 later – Halloween lecture! cc ee Plumbaginaceae bb [check out botanical Halloween Caryophyllaceae aa ii costumes for Extra Credit] hh z Carnivores 7 8 13 10 9 y 11,ff 12,gg Bioclim 1 • also look at Polygonaceae - Diversification shift (MEDUSA ML) d p e smart weed family Diversification shift (MEDUSA set) a 2 Putative duplication b • focus on “core Caryophyllales” f 4 1,n o j 3 m h l Phytolaccoids Core Caryophyllales g k Portulacineae i Aizoaceae Smith et al. 2018 Angiosperm Phylogeny Website Fig. 1 Chronogram of the Caryophyllales with putative whole genome duplications mapped along with identified diversification shifts. Diversification analyses were performed on the maximum likelihood tree as well as the bootstrap tree set and those shifts that were identified in both groups are shown. www.mobot.org/MOBOT/Research/A The• brancheswhy are this colored basedincredible on Bioclim variable 1diversity (mean annual temperature). – ecology, The numbers next physiology, to duplications correspond tohabit, the numbers incolor? Table 3 and the letters next to diversification shifts correspond to Table 4. Pweb/welcome.html • whole genome duplications & diversification shifts? Ó 2017 The Authors New Phytologist (2018) 217: 836–854 New Phytologist Ó 2017 New Phytologist Trust www.newphytologist.com 4 Core Caryophyllales Core Caryophyllales Caryophyllid clade • defined by 5 features but with 1. betalains Carnation -Caryophyllaceae some reversals anthocyanin Sea fig -Aizoaceae betalain Core Caryophyllales N containing – very different from flavonoids Core Caryophyllales Core Caryophyllales 2. free-central placentation (or 2. free-central placentation (or basal) = “Centrospermae” basal) = “Centrospermae” . generates capsule fruits capsule pyxis utricle 5 Core Caryophyllales Core Caryophyllales 3. curved embryo in ovule = 4. pollen shed in trinucleate stage campylotropous vs. most common 2-nucleate campylotropous ovule micropyle Core Caryophyllales Core Caryophyllales 5. sieve tube plastids with crystal Caryophyllid clade • problematic for family proteins surrounded by protein circumscription / recognition filaments • examine 3 groups phloem Core Caryophyllales 6 *Caryophyllaceae - Carnations *Caryophyllaceae - Carnations Caryophyllid clade • carnation or pink family - • dichasium inflorescence – usually a cyme herbs, often weedy Note 3 way Lychnis coronaria - mullein pink split, middle branch is oldest flower Minuartia - sandwort *Caryophyllaceae - Carnations *Caryophyllaceae - Carnations • dichasium inflorescence – usually a cyme CA 5, (5) CO 5 A 5,10 G (2-5) • leaves opposite, swollen nodes • 5 merous flowers, calyx fused +/- • corolla not fused, often lobed (staminal origin?) 7 *Caryophyllaceae - Carnations *Caryophyllaceae - Carnations CA 5, (5) CO 5 A 5,10 G (2-5) CA 5, (5) CO 5 A 5,10 G (2-5) • anthers of 1-2 whorls • free-central or axile placentation • 1 pistil of 2-5 carpels • capsule fruit opening by teeth or valves *Caryophyllaceae - Carnations *Caryophyllaceae - Carnations Huge family, 87 genera, 2300 species; widespread but Cerastium - mouse-ear chickweed characteristic of temperate and warm temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere. Minuartia michauxii sand rockwort 8 *Caryophyllaceae - Carnations *Caryophyllaceae - Carnations Saponaria officinalis - bouncing bet, soapwort Silene cucubalus Silene vulgaris Dianthus armeria bladder campion white campion deptford pink *Amaranthaceae - amaranths *Amaranthaceae - amaranths • herbs, often halophytes or weeds, worldwide • flowers small, bracted, congested, CA 5 CO 0 A 5 G (2-3) • 174 genera & 2,050 species lacking corolla • includes chenopods (old Chenopodiaceae) • bisexual or unisexual, monoecious or dioecious Chenopodium - lamb’s quarter Salicornia - glasswort Chenopodium - lamb’s quarter 9 *Amaranthaceae - amaranths *Amaranthaceae - amaranths • fruit is 1-seeded circumscissle capsule • native, weedy, and horticultural species (utricle) or basal seeded achene Amaranthus - Froelichia - • calyx is persistant around the fruit amaranth cottonseed utricle Spinacea - spinach Chenopodium *Amaranthaceae - amaranths *Amaranthaceae - amaranths • native, weedy, and horticultural species • native, weedy, and horticultural species Cycloloma atriplicifolium – winged pigweed Beta vulgaris - beet Bassia (Kochia) - summer cypress 10 *Amaranthaceae - amaranths *Amaranthaceae - amaranths • native, weedy, and horticultural species • desert specialists & tumbleweed invasives Celosia - cock’s comb Gomphrena - globe amaranth Atriplex - saltbush Salsola - Russian thistle *‘Portulacaceae’ - Purslanes *‘Portulacaceae’ - Purslanes Caryophyllid clade • belongs to a succulent group of • herbs, succulents families • world-wide, especially western N. • family boundaries obscure - e.g. America, 50 genera, 500 species Montiaceae = spring beauties Portulaca
Recommended publications
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Local Adaptation for Life-History Traits in Silene Latifolia
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Spring 2006 Local Adaptation for Life-History Traits in Silene Latifolia Brandy May Penna Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Recommended Citation Penna, Brandy May, "Local Adaptation for Life-History Traits in Silene Latifolia" (2006). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 734. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/734 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOCAL ADAPTATION FOR LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS IN SILENE LATIFOLIA by BRANDY M. PENNA (Under the Direction of Lorne M. Wolfe) ABSTRACT A fundamental question in evolutionary ecology is how species adjust post colonization. The plant Silene latifolia was introduced to North America (NA) from Europe (EU) in the 1800s. The goal of this thesis was to test if Silene latifolia has become locally adapted across its range. My first experiment tested local adaptation of germination success to three temperatures across three latitudinal regions in a growth chamber using seeds from nine EU and NA populations. Germination success or speed was similar among latitudinal regions across continents. My second experiment examined local adaptation at a continental scale; I grew plants from 15 EU and NA populations in four common gardens across continents. Growth and survival for the first year revealed that plants grew larger in their respective continents.
    [Show full text]
  • Untangling Phylogenetic Patterns and Taxonomic Confusion in Tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with Special Focus on Generic
    TAXON 67 (1) • February 2018: 83–112 Madhani & al. • Phylogeny and taxonomy of Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) Untangling phylogenetic patterns and taxonomic confusion in tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with special focus on generic boundaries Hossein Madhani,1 Richard Rabeler,2 Atefeh Pirani,3 Bengt Oxelman,4 Guenther Heubl5 & Shahin Zarre1 1 Department of Plant Science, Center of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 14155-6455, Tehran, Iran 2 University of Michigan Herbarium-EEB, 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-2228, U.S.A. 3 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box 91775-1436, Mashhad, Iran 4 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden 5 Biodiversity Research – Systematic Botany, Department of Biology I, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Menzinger Str. 67, 80638 München, Germany; and GeoBio Center LMU Author for correspondence: Shahin Zarre, [email protected] DOI https://doi.org/10.12705/671.6 Abstract Assigning correct names to taxa is a challenging goal in the taxonomy of many groups within the Caryophyllaceae. This challenge is most serious in tribe Caryophylleae since the supposed genera seem to be highly artificial, and the available morphological evidence cannot effectively be used for delimitation and exact determination of taxa. The main goal of the present study was to re-assess the monophyly of the genera currently recognized in this tribe using molecular phylogenetic data. We used the sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the chloroplast gene rps16 for 135 and 94 accessions, respectively, representing all 16 genera currently recognized in the tribe Caryophylleae, with a rich sampling of Gypsophila as one of the most heterogeneous groups in the tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • Slash-And-Burn Practices Decrease Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Abundance in Soil and the Roots of Didierea Madagascariensis in the Dry Tropical Forest of Madagascar
    fire Article Slash-and-Burn Practices Decrease Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Abundance in Soil and the Roots of Didierea madagascariensis in the Dry Tropical Forest of Madagascar Alícia Donnellan Barraclough 1,2,* and Pål Axel Olsson 1 1 Biodiversity, Department of Biology, Ecology Building, Lund University, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden; [email protected] 2 Institute for Applied Ecology, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 August 2018; Accepted: 26 September 2018; Published: 1 October 2018 Abstract: Deforestation and the use of fire to clear land have drastic effects on ecosystem functioning and compromise essential ecosystem services, especially in low-income tropical countries such as Madagascar. We evaluated the effects of local slash-and-burn practices on soil nutrients and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi abundance in a southwestern Madagascar forest. Nine sampling plot pairs were established along the border of a reserve within the Fiherenana–Manombo (pk-32) complex, where soil and seedling root samples of the endemic tree Didierea madagascariensis were taken. 3− + − We analysed soil extractable PO4 , NH4 , and NO3 as well as total soil carbon and nitrogen. We analysed AM fungal abundance in soil and roots through fatty acid marker analysis (NLFA and PLFA 16:1!5), spore extraction, and root staining. Slash-and-burn caused an increase in pH and doubled 3− −1 − −1 the plant available nutrients (from 7.4 to 13.1 µg PO4 g and from 6.9 to 13.2 µg NO3 g ). Total C and total N increased in deforested soil, from 0.6% to 0.84% and from 0.06% to 0.08%, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Age of Australian Chenopodiaceae
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 5 (2005) 59–80 www.elsevier.de/ode Origin and age of Australian Chenopodiaceae Gudrun Kadereita,Ã, DietrichGotzek b, Surrey Jacobsc, Helmut Freitagd aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Botanik und Botanischer Garten, Johannes Gutenberg-Universita¨t Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany bDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA cRoyal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Australia dArbeitsgruppe Systematik und Morphologie der Pflanzen, Universita¨t Kassel, D-34109 Kassel, Germany Received 20 May 2004; accepted 31 July 2004 Abstract We studied the age, origins, and possible routes of colonization of the Australian Chenopodiaceae. Using a previously published rbcL phylogeny of the Amaranthaceae–Chenopodiaceae alliance (Kadereit et al. 2003) and new ITS phylogenies of the Camphorosmeae and Salicornieae, we conclude that Australia has been reached in at least nine independent colonization events: four in the Chenopodioideae, two in the Salicornieae, and one each in the Camphorosmeae, Suaedeae, and Salsoleae. Where feasible, we used molecular clock estimates to date the ages of the respective lineages. The two oldest lineages both belong to the Chenopodioideae (Scleroblitum and Chenopodium sect. Orthosporum/Dysphania) and date to 42.2–26.0 and 16.1–9.9 Mya, respectively. Most lineages (Australian Camphorosmeae, the Halosarcia lineage in the Salicornieae, Sarcocornia, Chenopodium subg. Chenopodium/Rhagodia, and Atriplex) arrived in Australia during the late Miocene to Pliocene when aridification and increasing salinity changed the landscape of many parts of the continent. The Australian Camphorosmeae and Salicornieae diversified rapidly after their arrival. The molecular-clock results clearly reject the hypothesis of an autochthonous stock of Chenopodiaceae dating back to Gondwanan times.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Forest Trees of Madagascar
    The Red List of Dry Forest Trees of Madagascar Emily Beech, Malin Rivers, Sylvie Andriambololonera, Faranirina Lantoarisoa, Helene Ralimanana, Solofo Rakotoarisoa, Aro Vonjy Ramarosandratana, Megan Barstow, Katharine Davies, Ryan Hills, Kate Marfleet & Vololoniaina Jeannoda Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK. © 2020 Botanic Gardens Conservation International ISBN-10: 978-1-905164-75-2 ISBN-13: 978-1-905164-75-2 Reproduction of any part of the publication for educational, conservation and other non-profit purposes is authorized without prior permission from the copyright holder, provided that the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. Recommended citation: Beech, E., Rivers, M., Andriambololonera, S., Lantoarisoa, F., Ralimanana, H., Rakotoarisoa, S., Ramarosandratana, A.V., Barstow, M., Davies, K., Hills, BOTANIC GARDENS CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL (BGCI) R., Marfleet, K. and Jeannoda, V. (2020). Red List of is the world’s largest plant conservation network, comprising more than Dry Forest Trees of Madagascar. BGCI. Richmond, UK. 500 botanic gardens in over 100 countries, and provides the secretariat to AUTHORS the IUCN/SSC Global Tree Specialist Group. BGCI was established in 1987 Sylvie Andriambololonera and and is a registered charity with offices in the UK, US, China and Kenya. Faranirina Lantoarisoa: Missouri Botanical Garden Madagascar Program Helene Ralimanana and Solofo Rakotoarisoa: Kew Madagascar Conservation Centre Aro Vonjy Ramarosandratana: University of Antananarivo (Plant Biology and Ecology Department) THE IUCN/SSC GLOBAL TREE SPECIALIST GROUP (GTSG) forms part of the Species Survival Commission’s network of over 7,000 Emily Beech, Megan Barstow, Katharine Davies, Ryan Hills, Kate Marfleet and Malin Rivers: BGCI volunteers working to stop the loss of plants, animals and their habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Portulacaceae – Purslane Family
    PORTULACACEAE – PURSLANE FAMILY Plant: herbs, rarely shrubs Stem: usually fleshy or succulent Root: Leaves: simple, entire, opposite or alternate, or in basal rosettes; stipules mostly absent, may be represented by fleshy structures or modified into hairs Flowers: perfect; 2 sepals usually, rarely up to 9; 2-4-6 or > petals, united or separate at base; stamens usually opposite each petal, or more numerous in a bundle; ovary mostly superior or partially inferior, few to many ovules Fruit: capsule Other: mostly in southern hemisphere; Dicotyledons Group Genera: 30+ genera; locally Claytonia (spring-beauty), Montia, Portulaca, Talinum WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive Flower Morphology in the 2 or more sepals, 4-6 (rarely more, often Portulacaceae (Purslane Family) 5) free petals, leaves simple and entire, no stipules; stem often succulent Examples of common genera Shoreline Seapurslane [Virginia] Spring-Beauty Sesuvium portulacastrum (L.) L. Claytonia virginica L. var. virginica Purslane [Little Hog Weed] Portulaca oleracea L. (Introduced) Largeflower Fameflower [Rock Pink] Phemeranthus calycinus (Engelm.) Kiger Kiss Me Quick Portulaca pilosa L. PORTULACACEAE – PURSLANE FAMILY Ozark [Wide-Leafed] Spring-Beauty; Claytonia ozarkensis Miller & Chambers [Virginia] Spring-Beauty; Claytonia virginica L. var. virginica Largeflower Fameflower [Rock Pink]; Phemeranthus calycinus (Engelm.) Kiger Purslane [Little Hog Weed] Portulaca oleracea L. (Introduced) Kiss Me Quick; Portulaca pilosa
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Scientists Document Geographic Patterns in Pollinator Communities
    Journal of Pollination Ecology, 23(10), 2018, pp 90-97 CITIZEN SCIENTISTS DOCUMENT GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN POLLINATOR COMMUNITIES Alison J. Parker* and James D. Thomson University of Toronto, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 25 Harbord Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G5 Canada Abstract—It is widely recognized that plants are visited by a diverse community of pollinators that are highly variable in space and time, but biologists are often unable to investigate the pollinator climate across species’ entire ranges. To study the community of pollinators visiting the spring ephemerals Claytonia virginica and Claytonia caroliniana, we assembled a team of citizen scientists to monitor pollinator visitation to plants throughout the species’ ranges. Citizen scientists documented some interesting differences in pollinator communities; specifically, that western C. virginica and C. caroliniana populations are visited more often by the pollen specialist bee Andrena erigeniae and southern populations are visited more often by the bombyliid fly Bombylius major. Differences in pollinator communities throughout the plants’ range will have implications for the ecology and evolution of a plant species, including that differences may affect the male fitness of individual plants or the reproductive success of plant populations, or both. Keywords: citizen science, plant-pollinator interactions INTRODUCTION Looking for and documenting large-scale patterns in A rich history of research has explored the role of a pollinator communities requires a great deal of observational pollinator species in determining the reproductive success of a data. Studies are often limited to just one or a few plant plant, selecting for plant traits, and in some cases influencing populations (Herrera et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List For: Valley View Glades NA 418 Species
    Species List for: Valley View Glades NA 418 Species Jefferson County Date Participants Location NA List NA Nomination and subsequent visits Jefferson County Glade Complex NA List from Gass, Wallace, Priddy, Chmielniak, T. Smith, Ladd & Glore, Bogler, MPF Hikes 9/24/80, 10/2/80, 7/10/85, 8/8/86, 6/2/87, 1986, and 5/92 WGNSS Lists Webster Groves Nature Study Society Fieldtrip Jefferson County Glade Complex Participants WGNSS Vascular Plant List maintained by Steve Turner Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Acalypha virginica Virginia copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 2 3 Acer rubrum var. undetermined red maple Sapindaceae 5 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple Sapindaceae 2 -3 Acer saccharum var. undetermined sugar maple Sapindaceae 5 3 Achillea millefolium yarrow Asteraceae/Anthemideae 1 3 Aesculus glabra var. undetermined Ohio buckeye Sapindaceae 5 -1 Agalinis skinneriana (Gerardia) midwestern gerardia Orobanchaceae 7 5 Agalinis tenuifolia (Gerardia, A. tenuifolia var. common gerardia Orobanchaceae 4 -3 macrophylla) Ageratina altissima var. altissima (Eupatorium rugosum) white snakeroot Asteraceae/Eupatorieae 2 3 Agrimonia pubescens downy agrimony Rosaceae 4 5 Agrimonia rostellata woodland agrimony Rosaceae 4 3 Allium canadense var. mobilense wild garlic Liliaceae 7 5 Allium canadense var. undetermined wild garlic Liliaceae 2 3 Allium cernuum wild onion Liliaceae 8 5 Allium stellatum wild onion Liliaceae 6 5 * Allium vineale field garlic Liliaceae 0 3 Ambrosia artemisiifolia common ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 3 Ambrosia bidentata lanceleaf ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 4 Ambrosia trifida giant ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 -1 Amelanchier arborea var. arborea downy serviceberry Rosaceae 6 3 Amorpha canescens lead plant Fabaceae/Faboideae 8 5 Amphicarpaea bracteata hog peanut Fabaceae/Faboideae 4 0 Andropogon gerardii var.
    [Show full text]
  • Claytonia Virginica & Claytonia Caroliniana: Spring Beauty
    Zachariah Wahid Ethnobotany (EEB 455) June 10, 2014 Instructors: Scott Herron and Adam Schubel Claytonia virginica & Claytonia caroliniana: Spring beauty Meeautikwaeaugpineeg Species Productivity Schedule Zachariah Wahid Ethnobotany (EEB 455) June 10, 2014 Instructors: Scott Herron and Adam Schubel Family: Montiaceae (formerly: Portulaceae) Latin Name: Claytonia virginica L., Claytonia caroliniana L. Common Names: Spring beauty, Fairy spud Anishinaabe Name: Meeautikwaeaugpineeg Taxonomy The genus Claytonia was named aFter John Clayton (1685-1773), an American botanist, physician, and clerk to the County Court of Gloucester County, VA where the species name virginica, meaning “oF Virginia”, comes From (Black & JudZiewicz, 2009; Couplan, 1998). C. caroliniana was similarly named aFter the Carolinas. The diFFerence in scientiFic nomenclature between these species reFlects a diFFerence in distributions and slight variation in morphology (C. virginica is sometimes referred to as narrow-leaved spring beauty). The Anishinaabemowin word For spring beauty is Meeautikwaeaugpineeg and it can be applied to both species since they are functionally the same For humans (Meeker & Elias, 1993). The Anishinaabemowin name may reFer to the plant’s preferred forest habitat and to the underground organs From which spring beauty’s most common use is derived. However, very few print or online sources (if any) exist that provide a literal translation of the word into English. The English common name, “Fairy spud”, was coined by a plant Forager named Euell Gibbons and has been used to describe the plant’s underground storage organ (Edsall, 1985; Thayer, 2006). Other names For the corm include “Indian potato”, “wild potato”, and “mountain potato” (Kuhnlein & Turner, 1991). The genus Claytonia used to be classiFied as a member oF the Family Portulaceae but was recently reclassiFied as a member oF the Family Montiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Saponaria Bargyliana Gombault (Caryophyllaceae)
    TurkJBot 30(2006)63-70 ©TÜB‹TAK ResearchArticle Saponariabargyliana Gombault(Caryophyllaceae):ANewRecord forTurkeyandAnalysisofItsMorphologicalCharacterswith RelatedSpecies BirolMUTLU* ‹nönüUniversity,FacultyofScienceandArts,DepartmentofBiology,44280Malatya-TURKEY Received:18.10.2004 Accepted:05.12.2005 Abstract: Previously, Saponariabargyliana Gombaultwasknownonlyfromitstypelocality,thenorthofSyriaintheNosaïris mountains,whichwaspublishedbyGombaultin1962.DuringafieldtripinJune2002toErzin(Hatay)district,thespecieswas collectedforthesecondtimefromanewlocalityfarfromits locusclassicus.Thus,thisspecieswasdescribedasanewrecordfor thefloraofTurkey.Thedescriptionofthisspecieswasexpandedanditsgeographicaldistribution,habitat,floweringtimean d conservationstatusarediscussed.Quantitativeandqualitativeanalysisof Saponariabargyliana andcloselyrelatedspeciesis discussed.Elevenquantitativecharacterswereusedinalineardiscriminantanalysis.Inthediscriminantanalysis,themostu seful charactersforseparatingparticularspecieswereselected:seednumber,calyxnervenumber,coronalscalelength,calyxteethlength andpetalwidth.Withthese5mostimportantcharacters,100%ofplantswerecorrectlyclassifiedintothedesignatedgroups.T he analysisshowedthat S.bargyliana,S.officinalis L.and S.glutinosa M.Bieb.aredistinguishedbythequantitativemorphological characters.Calyxhairarrangementandtheconditionofthepedicelhairsarethemostimportantqualitativecharactersinthe identificationofthesespecies. KeyWords: Caryophyllaceae,Saponaria,newrecord,morphology,lineardiscriminantanalysis Saponariabargyliana
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture Végétative Et Structures Inflorescentielles Chez Les Didiereaceae De Madagascar
    Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 61, 381 - 400 Architecture végétative et structures inflorescentielles chez les Didiereaceae de Madagascar Par GEORGESCREMERS * et YVES SELL* * (Avec 7 figures) Reçu le 21 Novembre 1985 Zusammenf assuiig Der vegetative Aufbau der Didiereaceen erscheint als sehr mannigfaltig, da sich die 8 untersuchten Arten, 4 Modellen (denen von CORNER,von LEEUWENBERG,von KORmA, und von CHAMPAGNAT)zuordnen lassen, während die komplexe Organisation zweier weiterer Arten nicht einem der zur Zeit beschriebenen Modelle zugeordnet werden konnte. Andererseits ist bei den durch Kurztriebe hervorgebrachten Infloreszenzstrukturen der Thyrsus die fundamentale Blüheinheit. Dieser ist geschlossen (monotel, 4 Arten) oder offen (polytel oder trunkat-monotel? 2 Arten); seine Aggregation in eine dolden- artige, mehr oder weniger bliitenarme Infloreszenz wird bei 5 Arten beobachtet. Das sukzessive Aufblühen, von den ruhenden, ganz an der Basis der Kurztriebe gelegenen Knospen bedingt, wurde bei 7 Arten festgestellt. Abstract The vegetative organization of Didiereaceae seems highly diverse, since of the 8 species studied, 4 models (those of CORNER,LEEUWENBERG, KORIBA and CHAMPAGNAT) were identified, but the complex organization of 2 did not correspond to any of the models so far described. As regards the inflorescence structures established by the short shoots, thyrse is the main flowering unit. It can be either definite (monotelic, 4 species) or indefinite (polytelic or truncate-monotelic?, 2 species), and in 5 species it forms an ombel-like cluster more or less poor in flowers. Gradual flowering, due to rest buds at the very bases of the short shoots, is encountered in 7 species. * Centre ORSTOM, BP 165, 93 323 Cayenne; Guyane Francaise. ** Institut de Botanique, 28 rue Goethe, 67 O00 Strasbourg.
    [Show full text]