DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of Spanish River Basin Management Plans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary of Spanish River Basin Management Plans Summary of Spanish River Basin Management Plans DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR WATER CENTRE FOR HYDROGRAPHIC STUDIES STATE SECRETARIAT FOR THE ENVIRONMENT CEDEX SUMMARY OF SPANISH RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANS Second Cycle of the WFD (2015‐2021) Draft. Version 3.82 Madrid, on 25th January 2017 Summary of Spanish River Basin Management Plans TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 9 1.1. Purpose of the Report ......................................................................................................... 10 1.2. Structure and Scope of the Report ...................................................................................... 11 1.3. The Plans and their Territorial Scopes ................................................................................. 11 1.4. Objectives and Criteria of the River Basin Management Planning ........................................ 16 1.5. The process of river basin management planning ................................................................ 17 1.6. Specific characteristics of second‐cycle plans ...................................................................... 21 1.6.1. Association Agreement.................................................................................................... 22 1.6.2. EAFRD Regulation ............................................................................................................ 22 1.6.3. Documents regarding infringement proceedings on EU law .......................................... 23 1.6.4. Analysis of the EC on first‐cycle plans ............................................................................. 23 1.6.5. Case Law Analysis ............................................................................................................ 24 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEEDINGS 29 3. STRUCTURE AND CONTENTS OF THE PLANS 35 3.1. Structure of the Plans ......................................................................................................... 35 3.2. Compulsory Contents of the River Basin Management Plans ............................................... 37 4. ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENT OF THE RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANS 41 4.1. Characterisation of the River Basin District ......................................................................... 41 4.2. Characterisation of water bodies ........................................................................................ 42 4.2.1. Surface water bodies ....................................................................................................... 43 4.2.2. Groundwater Bodies ........................................................................................................ 46 4.3. Inventory of Resources ....................................................................................................... 49 4.4. Identification of Significant Pressures ................................................................................. 53 4.5. Uses and demands .............................................................................................................. 57 4.6. Transfer of Water Resources ............................................................................................... 59 4.7. Ecological flows ................................................................................................................... 61 4.8. Allocation and Reservation of Resources ............................................................................. 63 4.9. Identification of Protected Areas ........................................................................................ 67 4.10. Monitoring of water bodies and protected areas .............................................................. 70 4.10.1. Assessment methods for surface water bodies ............................................................ 71 4.10.2. Assessment methods for groundwater bodies ............................................................. 74 4.11. Status of water bodies ...................................................................................................... 74 4.11.1. Assessment of the status of surface water bodies ........................................................ 74 4.11.2. Status of groundwater bodies ....................................................................................... 79 4.12. Environmental objectives and exemptions ........................................................................ 82 4.13. Cost recovery of water services ......................................................................................... 88 5. PROGRAMMES OF MEASURES. INVESTMENTS FORESEEN FOR RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANS 92 6. FINAL DIAGNOSIS 97 7. BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES 101 Page 3 Summary of Spanish River Basin Management Plans LIST OF ADDENDA Addendum 1. Territory and population of the Autonomous Communities in the river basin districts. Addendum 2. Types of surface water bodies. Total and by river basin district. Addendum 3. Assessment of the status / ecological potential and of the chemical potential of surface water bodies. LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Regulations governing the delimitation of the river basic districts comprised exclusively of regional river basins. ..................................................................................................................................... 13 Table 2. Summary of the case law by the High Court regarding first‐cycle management plans (2009‐2015). ..... 25 Table 3. Appeals filed before the High Court regarding second‐cycle river basin management plans (2015‐2021). ........................................................................................................................................................ 28 Table 4. Some of the key dates for the preparation of second‐cycle river basin management plans. ................. 29 Table 5. Key dates corresponding to the strategic environmental assessment of the river basin management plans. ............................................................................................................................................... 31 Table 6. Web links to access the entire contents of the river basin management plans. ..................................... 32 Table 7. Number of documents with proposals, comments or suggestions received during public consultation stages. ............................................................................................................................................. 32 Table 8. Indicative values (number of pages) of the structure and size of river basin management plans. ......... 36 Table 9. Reference of Spanish regulation describing the mandatory contents for river basin management plans. ........................................................................................................................................................ 38 Table 10. Identification of the chapter number of the Dossier of the River Basin Management Plan in which such content is included. ................................................................................................................ 40 Table 11. Some basic data describing river basin districts .................................................................................... 42 Table 12. Inventory of surface water bodies. Comparison between the first and the second planning cycle. .... 43 Table 13. Natural, heavily modified and artificial water bodies. Comparison between planning cycles. ............. 44 Table 14. Groundwater Bodies. Comparison between planning cycles. ............................................................... 47 Table 15. Identification of groundwater bodies related to aquifers shared between several scopes of river basin management planning. ................................................................................................................... 49 Table 16. Total contributions under the natural regime in the different districts. ............................................... 50 Table 17. Renewable and available resources (hm3/year) for all groundwater bodies within each district. Comparison between the first and the second planning cycle. ...................................................... 51 Table 18. Currently used unconventional resources (2012‐2015). ....................................................................... 52 Table 19. Number of surface water bodies affected by the main types of significant pressures corresponding to both planning cycles. ...................................................................................................................... 55 Table 20. Number of groundwater bodies affected by the main types of significant pressures corresponding two both planning cycles. ...................................................................................................................... 56 Table 21. Water demands for each river basin district ......................................................................................... 58 Table 22. Irrigation areas (ha) in the different peninsular planning scopes. ......................................................... 59 Table 23. Main interbasin transfers (over 1 hm3/year) between Spanish planning scopes. ................................. 60 Table 24. General estimation of average resources recently transferred among the different planning scopes. Amounts in hm3/year ...................................................................................................................... 61 Table 25. Number of bodies with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ated in Specific Areas of Spain and Measures to Control The
    No L 352/ 112 Official Journal of the European Communities 31 . 12. 94 COMMISSION DECISION of 21 December 1994 derogating from prohibitions relating to African swine fever for certain areas in Spain and repealing Council Decision 89/21/EEC (94/887/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, contamination or recontamination of pig holdings situ­ ated in specific areas of Spain and measures to control the movement of pigs and pigmeat from special areas ; like­ Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European wise it is necessary to recognize the measures put in place Community, by the Spanish authorities ; Having regard to Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra­ Community trade in bovine animals and swine (') as last Whereas it is the objective within the eradication amended by Directive 94/42/EC (2) ; and in particular programme adopted by Commission Decision 94/879/EC Article 9a thereof, of 21 December 1994 approving the programme for the eradication and surveillance of African swine fever presented by Spain and fixing the level of the Commu­ Having regard to Council Directive 72/461 /EEC of 12 nity financial contribution (9) to eliminate African swine December 1972 on animal health problems affecting fever from the remaining infected areas of Spain ; intra-Community trade in fresh meat (3) as last amended by Directive 92/ 1 18/EEC (4) and in particular Article 8a thereof, Whereas a semi-extensive pig husbandry system is used in certain parts of Spain and named 'montanera' ; whereas
    [Show full text]
  • River Basin Management Plans
    EUROPE-INBO PORTO (PORTUGAL) 27 – 30 SEPTEMBER 2011 Tagus River Basin District Administration Administração da Região Hidrográfica do Tejo, I.P. (ARH do Tejo, I.P.) Manuel Lacerda WATER LAW – INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK . Public Administration . National level - National Water Authority (Instituto da Água – INAG) . Regional level - Coordination and Regional Development Commissions . River Basin District level – River Basin District Administrations (Administrações de Região Hidrográfica – ARH) . Local level - Municipalities . Public or private entities . Users Associations . Multipurpose Infrastructures . Advisory bodies . National Water Council . River Basin District Council RIVER BASIN DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIONS (RBDA) IN PORTUGAL MAINLAND ▪ ARH do Norte (North RBDA) . Minho and Lima RB . Cávado, Ave e Leça RB . Douro RB ▪ ARH do Centro (Centre RBDA) . Vouga, Mondego and Lis RB . West Coast RB ▪ ARH do Tejo (Tagus RBDA) . Tagus RB ▪ ARH do Alentejo (Alentejo RBDA) . Sado and Mira RB . Guadiana RB ▪ ARH do Algarve (Algarve RBDA) . Algarve RB TAGUS RBDA AREA AND MAIN FIGURES Portugal ARH do Tejo mainland jurisdiction area Area (km2) 89 271 28 077 (31 %) Population (inhabit.) 9 858 925 3 485 816 (35 %) Municipalities (nr.) 278 107 (38 %) Coastal line (km) 898 261 (32 %) Bathing areas (nr.) 425 124 (29 %) TAGUS – INTERNATIONAL RIVER BASIN DISTRICT . Convention for the Protection and Sustainable Use of Water in the Shared River Basins of Portugal and Spain (Albufeira Convention) . Commission for Implementation and Development of the Convention (CADC)
    [Show full text]
  • Megaliths and Stelae in the Inner Basin of Tagus River: Santiago De Alcántara, Alconétar and Cañamero (Cáceres, Spain)
    MEGALITHS AND STELAE IN THE INNER BASIN OF TAGUS RIVER: SANTIAGO DE ALCÁNTARA, ALCONÉTAR AND CAÑAMERO (CÁCERES, SPAIN) Primitiva BUENO RAMIREZ, Rodrigo de BALBÍN BEHRMANN, Rosa BARROSO BERMEJO Área de Prehistoria de la Universidad de Alcalá de Henares Enrique CERRILLO CUENCA CSIC, Instituto de Arqueología de Mérida Antonio GONZALEZ CORDERO, Alicia PRADA GALLARDO Archaeologist Abstract: Several projects on the megalithic sites in the basin of the river Tagus contribute evidences on the close relation between stelae with engraved weapons and chronologically advanced megalithic graves. The importance of human images in the development of Iberian megalithic art supports an evolution of these contents toward pieces with engraved weapons which dating back to the 3rd millennium cal BC. From the analysis of the evidences reported by the whole geographical sector, this paper is also aimed at determining if the graphic resources used in these stelae express any kind of identity. Visible stelae in barrows and chambers from the 3rd millennium cal BC would be the images around which sepulchral areas were progressively added, thus constituting true ancestral references throughout the Bronze Age. Keywords: Chalcolithic, megalithic sites, identities, metallurgy, SW Iberian Peninsula INTRODUCTION individuals along a constant course (Bueno et al. 2007a, 2008a) from the ideology of the earliest farmers (Bueno The several works on megalithic stelae we have et al. 2007b) to, practically, the Iron Age (Bueno et al. developed so far shape a methodological and theoretical 2005a, 2010). The similarity observed between this long base of analysis aimed at proving a strong symbolic course and the line of megalithic art is the soundest implementation current throughout the 3rd millennium cal reference to include the symbolic universe of these BC in SW Iberian Peninsula (Bueno 1990, 1995: Bueno visible anthropomorphic references in the ideological et al.
    [Show full text]
  • El Tramo Urion-Aruci (Ravenn. 317.16-17)
    Archivo Español de Arqveología, Vol. 79, págs. 225-238, 2006 ISSN: 0066 6742 EL TRAMO URION-ARUCI (RAVENN. 317.16-17) POR ALFONSO JIMÉNEZ MARTÍN Universidad de Sevilla ([email protected]) Para Álvaro, Guillermo, Mario y Lorenzo. RESUMEN crítica de los estudios precedentes, por lo que ahorraré la Este artículo critica las propuestas difundidas en fechas revisión de los antecedentes bibliográficos y documenta- recientes para el trazado de la calzada que unía, según el Anó- les aunque, por razones puramente metodológicas, citaré nimo de Rávena, dos poblaciones de la Bætica, Urion y Aruci, las fuentes a través de la Tabvla Imperii Romani. Para las actuales localidades onubenses de Riotinto y Aroche, pues comodidad del lector mi dibujo reproduce, sobre una ignoran aspectos básicos de los trazados romanos y, sobre todo, base cartográfica más actual, el mapa que sintetiza, en su pretenden explicar la existencia de un puente “romano” en figura 19, las conclusiones del libro de referencia. Campofrío, que, en función de la documentación disponible, es La mayor duda que me suscita el libro se refiere al del siglo XVI; el artículo vuelve, básicamente, a la propuesta camino romano que iba de Riotinto (Urion) a Aroche de P. Sillières, de 1990. (Aruci), que sólo atestigua el Anónimo de Rávena y de esta manera tan escueta: SUMMARY 3 This paper criticizes recent proposals about the layout of the [….317, 15] Onoba roman road between Urion and Aruci (Riotinto and Aroche, [317, 16] Urion 4 Huelva, Spain) according to the Ravenna Cosmography. [317, 17] Aruci 5 Proposals ignore basic aspects of the Roman layouts; mainly they [317, 18…] Fines 6 try to explain the existence of a “Roman” bridge in Campofrío, but, based on the documentation available, it dates of century XVI; so this paper returns to the proposal of P.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Sensitive Areas and Vulnerable Zones in Transitional and Coastal Portuguese Systems
    IDENTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE AREAS AND VULNERABLE ZONES IN TRANSITIONAL AND COASTAL PORTUGUESE SYSTEMS J. G. Ferreira T. Simas A. Nobre M. C. Silva K. Shifferegger J. Lencart-Silva Application of the United States National Estuarine Eutrophication Assessment to the Minho, Lima, Douro, Ria de Aveiro, Mondego, Tagus, Sado, Mira, Ria Formosa and Guadiana systems ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Acknowledgements The data required for this study exist for many Portuguese estuaries and coastal lagoons. However, data producers often do not make this information widely available; as a result, very limited datasets are sometimes extrapolated to describe the pressures and state of a particular system. INAG, the Portuguese Water Institute, has strongly endorsed open standards in access to water quality data, and has promoted many initiatives which help Portugal have a modern outlook on the relevance of public data dissemination. We thank INAG for the opportunity which this work has given us to play a part in information sharing in estuarine research. Our sincere thanks go to all the scientific community, which contributed data and information for this study. In particular, we must mention those who greatly improved the substance of this work, providing advice, suggesting interpretations, and critically reviewing the text: they played a key consultancy role in the development of the NEEA approach to Portuguese estuaries. Suzanne Bricker, from the Special Projects Office, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, coordinator of the NEEA study carried out for 138 estuaries in the United States. Suzanne was an enthusiastic supporter throughout, and supplied us with much good advice on methodological issues. She worked with us both in Portugal and in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rock Art of the Tagus Valley Was Probably Known by Some Besides Its Re- Discovery in October 1971
    Instituto Politécnico de Tomar – Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (Departamento de Geologia da UTAD – Departamento de Território, Arqueologia e Património do IPT) Master Erasmus Mundus em QUATERNARIO E PRÉ-HISTÓRIA Final Dissertation: CONTRIBUTION TO THE TAGUS ROCK ART COMPLEX STUDY THE GARDETE ROCK ART SITE KAHIR ABDUL Supervisors: Professor Doutor Hipólito Collado Giraldo & Professor Doutor Luiz Oosterbeek Ano acadêmico 2012/2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to start by mentioning my supervisors Professor Doutor Hipólito Collado Giraldo & Professor Doutor Luiz Oosterbeek, whom I thank for accepting me and allowing me to research and produce this Master Thesis on the site of Gardete. Also for all the other Professors and Teachers who have taught me over the last two years. The people of the Museum of Macao and the Instituto Tera e Memoria (ITM) and all colleagues who have walked in and out of the Rock Art Laboratory at the ITM. A few people in particular that I must express a few words to. First of all Jorge Cristovao with all his subtle encouragements and energy which kept up my spirits at a time when it seemed like everything was touch and go. I have to express myself in a way that I could not in person, and that is to tell you, that you are more than a colleague but a good friend. The next on this list is Thalison dos Santos whom I have to be honest and say was my ‘sparring partner’ for the completion of this Master Thesis. The numerous discussions spent over late nights, expanding the hours each time proved to be fruitful engagements of both our intellects and tested at the same time, our strenghts and weaknesses in character.
    [Show full text]
  • Guía De La Red De Senderos De La Provincia De Huelva
    Guía de la Red de Senderos de la provincia de Huelva Guía de la Red de Senderos de la provincia de Huelva Edita: Grupo de Desarrollo Rural “Sierra de Aracena y Picos de Aroche” Elaboración de contenidos y diseño: B-86411162 Auren Corporaciones Públicas ABM, S.L. ÍNDICE 01 PresenTaciÓN 07 02 INTRODucciÓN 08 03 LA RED DE senDEROS 14 RUTA 1 / Huelva – Moguer La ría y los Lugares Colombinos 18 RUTA 2 / Moguer – Cabezudos El camino de Moguer I 21 RUTA 3 / Cabezudos – El Rocío El camino de Moguer II 24 RUTA 4 / El Rocío – Hinojos Doñana, de la marisma a los pinares 27 RUTA 5 / Hinojos – Paterna del Campo Olivos, trigales y viñedos del Condado 30 RUTA 6 / Paterna del Campo – Berrocal Adentrándonos en el Paisaje 34 Protegido del Río Tinto RUTA 7 / Berrocal - Nerva Descubriendo el río Tinto desde el tren minero 38 RUTA 8 / Nerva – Ventas de Arriba En las raíces de la tierra 42 RUTA 9 / Campofrío – Mina Concepción El camino del Odiel 46 RUTA 10 / Mina Concepción-Navahermosa 49 Sendero de Gran Recorrido “Tierra del Descubrimiento” RUTA 11 / Navahermosa-El Repilado Entre Ríos 54 RUTA 12 / El Repilado - Aroche Paseando por el bosque manejado 58 RUTA 13 / Aroche-El Mustio Eco de la naturaleza 61 RUTA 14 / El Mustio – Santa Bárbara Encuentro entre Sierra y Andévalo 64 RUTA 15 / Santa Bárbara de Casa –Puebla de Guzmán Un paseo por la 67 Dehesa del Andévalo RUTA 16 / Puebla de Guzmán – La Isabel Pasado minero del Andévalo 70 RUTA 17 / La Isabel – Sanlúcar de Guadiana Descubriendo el Guadiana, 73 un río fronterizo RUTA 18 / Sanlúcar de Guadiana – San Silvestre de Guzmán Ribera y Dehesa, 76 un paisaje de frontera RUTA 19 / San Silvestre de Guzmán -Ayamonte Divisando el mar 79 RUTA 20 / Ayamonte - Cartaya La Vía Verde Litoral 82 RUTA 21 / Cartaya – Nuevo Portil Cartaya, una ruta de contrastes 86 RUTA 22 / Nuevo Portil – Huelva, ramal Punta Umbría Un Camino Verde 91 hacia Huelva 04 CONTacTOS ÚTiles 96 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Morena De Huelva Y Riveras De Huelva Y Cala
    24 Sierra Morena de Huelva y riveras de Huelva y Cala 1. Identificación y localización El extremo occidental de Sierra Morena es un ámbito La condición fronteriza de esta demarcación ha añadido encuadrado dentro del área paisajística de las serranías dos componentes básicos: la escasa ocupación y la pre- de Baja Montaña, en la que predominan los relieves sencia de elementos defensivos de interés. Esto se apre- acolinados ocupados por dehesas dedicadas a la cría cia especialmente en la mitad occidental, dado que la del ganado porcino (verdadera marca de clase de este oriental posee una red de asentamientos más densa. sector). Esta vocación por las actividades agrosilvícolas, especialmente ganaderas y forestales, confiere un ca- La cercanía y mejora de las comunicaciones con Huelva rácter y personalidad fuertes a este ámbito de peque- y, sobre todo, Sevilla, ha provocado una demanda de se- ños pueblos bien integrados en el paisaje y cabeceras gundas residencias en este espacio que está empezando comarcales con grandes hitos paisajísticos (Aracena, a afectar los frágiles equilibrios sociales, culturales y pai- Cortegana, Aroche, etcétera). sajísticos de muchos municipios, sobre todo de los más cercanos a la carretera que enlaza Sevilla con Portugal. Reseñas patrimoniales en el Plan de Ordenación del Territorio de Andalucía (pota) Zonificación del POTA: Sierra de Aracena (dominio territorial de Sierra Morena-Los Pedroches) Referentes territoriales para la planificación y gestión de los bienes patrimoniales: red de centros históricos rurales
    [Show full text]
  • Tagus River Basin Features
    _______________________________________________________________ TAGUS RIVER BASIN FEATURES INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 3 2. TAGUS RBD’S CLIMATE FEATURES:........................................................................ 6 3. CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS IN THE TAGUS RB AND PREVISIONS: .................... 7 4. DROUGHTS HISTORY IN THE TAGUS RB: ............................................................. 11 5. DROUGHT MANAGEMENT TOOLS ....................................................................... 14 5. 1. Drought Management Plan ...................................................................... 14 6. DESERTIFICATION IN THE TAGUS RB ................................................................... 19 7. ASSESSMENT OF SPECIFIC MEASURES IN THE RBMP: ......................................... 21 _________________________________________________________ Annex 2: Tagus River Basin Features. 1 _______________________________________________________________ TAGUS RIVER BASIN FEATURES 1. INTRODUCTION The main problem of desertification in Spain has been closely linked to the planning and strategy of the forestry sector (Spanish Forest Strategy, adopted on March 8, 1999 by the Environmental Sectorial Conference). However, beyond the forest desertification scope, struggles have included statements and proposals from all sectors involved, particularly in the agricultural sector and the ones related to water resources management. Therefore,
    [Show full text]
  • The Jabugo DOP, Only a Step for Its Registration by the EU
    eComercio Agrario Actualidad del sector agrario http://ecomercioagrario.com/en The Jabugo DOP, only a step for its registration by the EU The Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) Jabugo is only one step away from its registration by the European Union Commission, having concluded the deadline so that from any country in the world it could be submitted allegations to this mention of quality, which means that it is only necessary to close this Community procedure. On the other hand, the Regulatory Council of the Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) Ham of Huelva has announced its provisional figures of pigs identified in the meadows, sealed pieces in dryers and hams and pallets certified before their departure from the warehouses, during the year 2016, and has taken stock of the actions of the year. The most important of all what happened in 2016 is that the Commission of the European Union published on November 1th1, 2016 the request to change the name of the PDO Ham de Huelva by DOP Jabugo in the Official Document of the European Union (DOUE). After the end of the opposition period at the international level, and since it is hoped that there will be no allegation, it is awaiting the registration of the Jabugo PDO in the coming weeks 1 / 3 eComercio Agrario Actualidad del sector agrario http://ecomercioagrario.com/en As for the data for the year 2016, first, the number of Iberian pigs identified in the registered meadows was 21,215, a number that Guillermo García-Palacios, president of the Regulatory Council, considers positive, since the number of pigs controlled in this montanera 2016/17 "supposes a stability to be similar to the one of the previous montanera".
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Contaminants of Concern in the Upper Tagus River
    Science of the Total Environment 667 (2019) 222–233 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science of the Total Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv Identification of contaminants of concern in the upper Tagus river basin (central Spain). Part 2: Spatio-temporal analysis and ecological risk assessment Alba Arenas-Sánchez a,⁎,1, Andreu Rico a,1, David Rivas-Tabares c, Alberto Blanco a, Patricia Garcia-Doncel a, Amaya Romero-Salas a,LeonorNozala,b, Marco Vighi a a IMDEA Water Institute, Science and Technology Campus of the University of Alcalá, Avenida Punto Com 2, P.O. Box 28805, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain b Institute of Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology (CQAB), University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain c CEIGRAM, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain HIGHLIGHTS GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT • Chemical status evaluated in 16 sites of the Tagus river basin over three seasons. • Land use had a stronger influence than season on contamination patterns. • Copper and zinc may exert acute toxic- ity to primary producers and inverte- brates. • Diuron, chlorpyrifos and imidacloprid identified as priority hazardous com- pounds. • Only 30% of the sampled sites showed good chemical status as per the WFD. article info abstract Article history: This study provides a description of the water quality status in the tributaries of the upper Tagus River and a pre- Received 28 December 2018 liminary risk assessment for freshwater organisms. A wide range of physico-chemical parameters, nutrients, Received in revised form 18 February 2019 metals and organic contaminants (20 pesticides, and 32 point source chemicals, mainly pharmaceuticals) were Accepted 18 February 2019 monitored during spring, summer and autumn of 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.M MUNICIPIOS MAYORES DE 1000 HABITANTES I.B.I I.A.E. Tipo Impositivo En Porcentaje Coeficiente De Situación Año Última Revisión Bienes Bienes Bienes Caract
    IMPUESTOS SOBRE BIENES INMUEBLES Y ACTIVIDADES ECONÓMICAS HUELVA AÑO 2020 1.M MUNICIPIOS MAYORES DE 1000 HABITANTES I.B.I I.A.E. Tipo impositivo en porcentaje Coeficiente de situación Año última revisión Bienes Bienes Bienes caract. Máximo Mínimo catastral urbanos rústicos especiales 21-002 Aljaraque 2000 0,88500 0,84000 0,88500 2,00 1,00 21-004 Almonaster la Real 2010 0,55000 0,75000 1,30000 0,90 0,50 21-005 Almonte 1995 0,69000 0,78000 0,60000 1,00 1,00 21-006 Alosno 2005 0,65000 0,85000 1,30000 1,00 1,00 21-007 Aracena 2004 0,76000 0,90000 0,93000 1,30 0,90 21-008 Aroche 2010 0,72100 0,82400 0,61800 1,00 1,00 21-010 Ayamonte 1996 0,77500 0,75000 1,30000 1,00 1,00 21-011 Beas 2007 0,74000 0,74000 1,20000 1,40 1,29 21-013 Bollullos Par del Condado 2001 0,77950 0,93000 0,60000 2,50 2,00 21-014 Bonares 2002 0,93000 0,70000 1,00000 1,68 1,58 21-016 Cala 2010 0,55000 0,80000 0,60000 1,00 1,00 21-017 Calañas 2010 0,60000 0,90000 0,60000 1,20 1,00 21-018 Campillo (El) 2012 0,63000 0,90000 1,30000 1,35 1,29 21-021 Cartaya 1998 0,85000 0,85000 0,60000 2,00 1,50 21-023 Cerro de Andévalo (El) 1989 0,55000 0,90000 0,80000 1,00 1,00 21-025 Cortegana 2011 0,80000 0,80000 0,60000 1,35 1,29 21-029 Cumbres Mayores 1989 0,67000 0,50000 0,63000 1,60 1,50 21-030 Chucena 2003 0,85000 1,00000 0,80000 1,70 1,60 21-031 Encinasola 2012 0,40000 0,75000 0,60000 1,00 1,00 21-032 Escacena del Campo 2008 0,70000 0,70000 0,60000 1,00 1,00 21-034 Galaroza 2011 0,65620 0,89050 0,68000 1,00 1,00 21-035 Gibraleón 2005 0,69000 0,80000 1,30000 2,50 2,00 21-038 Higuera de
    [Show full text]