DOCSLIB.ORG

The Battle for Athens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Battle for Athens Anglo-American Policy in Greece (1946-50): A Study on the Politics of Fear, Manipulation and the Origins of the Cold War By Spero Simeon Zachary Paravantes B.A, Thompson Rivers University, 2000 M.A, Simon Fraser University, 2009 DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies © Spero Simeon Zachary Paravantes 2013 UNIVERSITY OF MACEDONIA THESSALONIKI June 2013 All Rights Reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or by other means, without permission of the author. Disclaimer This version of my dissertation, though reviewed and edited after my defence, is still not complete and ready for publication. When a version of this dissertation is published, it will likely contain differences from this text. Whether these are differences in sources, arguments, conclusions, formatting, findings, etc., the published version shall be considered and acknowledged as containing my views and findings, and will supersede this version. ii Abstract While trying to understand and explain the origins and dynamics of Anglo- American foreign policy in the pre and early years of the Cold War, the role that perception played in the design and implementation of foreign policy became a central focus. From this point came the realization of a general lack of emphasis and research into the ways in which the British government managed to convince the United States government to assume support for worldwide British strategic objectives. How this support was achieved is the central theme of this dissertation. This work attempts to provide a new analysis of the role that the British played in the dramatic shift in American foreign policy from 1946 to 1950. To achieve this shift (which also included support of British strategic interests in the Eastern Mediterranean) this dissertation argues that the British used Greece, first as a way to draw the United States further into European affairs, and then as a way to anchor the United States in Europe, achieving a guarantee of security of the Eastern Mediterranean and of Western Europe. To support these hypotheses, this work uses mainly the British and American documents relating to Greece from 1946 to 1950 in an attempt to clearly explain how these nations made and implemented policy towards Greece during this crucial period in history. In so doing it also tries to explain how American foreign policy in general changed from its pre-war focus on non-intervention, to the American foreign policy to which the world has become accustomed since iii 1950. To answer these questions, I, like the occupying (and later intervening) powers did, must use Greece as an example. In this, I hope that I may be forgiven since unlike them, I intend not to make of it one. My objectives for doing so lie not in justifying policy, but rather in explaining it. This study would appear to have special relevance now, not only for the current financial crisis which has placed Greece once again in world headlines, but also for the legacy of the Second World War and the post-war strife the country experienced which is still playing out today with examples like the Distomo massacre, German war reparations and on-going social, academic and political strife over the legacy of the Greek Civil War. iv Preface: Considering that the origin of the names of Britain, the United States of America and Russia, are found in Ancient and Byzantine Greek,1 it is perhaps not surprising that these states played such major roles in the history of the Modern Greek State. As a Greek-Canadian having grown up in Canada, I was presented with the stories of wartime Greece from my father and uncle. After initial studies into the field of Modern Greek studies I realised that the stories I had heard as a child were not just stories, but were their recollections and perceptions of very real events. Upon further studies, though I discovered that in some instances their perceptions differed from actual events, this realization led me to the larger issue of the role that perception plays (not only on an individual level, but also on a collective level) in the formation of ideas and the formulation of policy. Therefore, while trying to understand and explain the origins and dynamics of Anglo-American foreign policy in the early years of the Cold War, the role that perception played in the design and implementation of foreign policy became the central focus. From this starting point came the realization of a general lack of emphasis and research into the ways in which the British government managed to convince the United States government to assume support for British objectives in the Eastern Mediterranean. How this support was achieved is the central theme of this dissertation. 1 Russia comes from Ros (Byzantine for Red) America from Amerigio (Italian derivation of Geia) and Britain from (Bretannia) named by an ancient Greek explorer. v During the period under examination, the Security Council became the arena where the Soviet Union and the United States (initially with British urging but then succumbing to domestic anti-communist pressure) ‘felt each other out’ and used Greece to do it. The former Wartime allies finally came to the relationship predicted by Winston Churchill and General George Patton, and Greece became a pawn the Superpower shuffle that was the beginning of the Cold War. vi Dedication To my mother. May her memory be eternal. vii Acknowledgements First, I must extend my deepest thanks to my supervisor Professor Irini Lagani. I cannot begin to express the gratitude that I feel towards her for accepting me as her student, for mentoring me, for guiding the progress of my dissertation, and for her constant support. She also accepted me as her student without ever having met me, and aided me greatly in the adjustment to academic life overseas and away from home over the past three and a half years. I will always be grateful. I would also like to extend deep appreciation to the second member of my supervisory committee Professor Nikos Marantzidis. Like Professor Lagani did, he welcomed me into the department, and has supported and encouraged me at every step though the completion of my PhD. He also gave me my first teaching opportunity, and showed faith in me by allowing me to design the course and the materials. His belief in me bolstered my own. I must also thank the third member of my supervisory committee Professor Theodoseos Karvounarakis. He greatly assisted me with the technical aspects of my dissertation, finding sources that were vital to my research, and, with his comments, helping me to refine and clarify my arguments. I do not know how to repay the kindness and support each has shown me, but I promise to try and become a teacher as dedicated and as competent as they are. I thank you all. Though it may “go without saying” that one’s family plays a great role in any personal success, I cannot leave that unsaid. Without the love, understanding viii and support of my father Dean and my brother Nic from the time that I began my PhD, it would never have been completed. I do not deserve to have been given such a wonderful family, and I fear that I will never be able to repay them for the love, support and friendship they have shown me. I have learned so much from each of you. I would also like to thank my uncle Ted Paravantes for his advice and encouragement throughout the process of finishing my PhD, and to his family for their continuing love and support. Being away from one’s family for so long is difficult, and yet they made it bearable with their support. I know that I would not have succeeded without you. I miss and love you all. I would also like to thank Professor Eftichios Sartzetakis from the department of Economics at the University of Macedonia for convincing me that I could do a PhD in Greece, and for introducing me to Professor Marantzidis and getting this whole process started. I would also like to express my thanks to Professor James Pettifer of Oxford University who has become a great friend and mentor over the past year. His comments on my dissertation also greatly helped me refine my research and arguments prior to my defence, and to help me realize just how much work is needed to produce a quality monograph. I would also like to thank my colleague Dr. Stelios Sotirios for welcoming me to the office, for the great office debates and discussions, and for helping me become a part of the University environment. Thank you to all of my friends from Greece and Canada for your company over the whole progress of my education. Each of you has helped make this journey bearable. I would also like to thank Sakis, Victoria and Sophia Pichos for ix welcoming into their family, for making me feel like one of their own, and for their constant support and encouragement. I would especially like to thank professors Giorgos Skoulas (PaMak), Thanassis D, Sfikas (APth) and Procopis Papastratis (Panteio), the remaining members of my examination committee, who made themselves available at great inconvenience to themselves, to read my work and offer valuable criticism and comments. They have all helped me to gain a greater understanding of this dark period of Greek history, and have reminded me, through their own work and through their help with mine, of the human cost that is paid conflicts such as these.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project JOHN W. MCDONALD Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: June 5, 1997 Copyright 2 3 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born in Ko lenz, Germany of U.S. military parents Raised in military bases throughout U.S. University of Illinois Berlin, Germany - OMGUS - Intern Program 1,4.-1,50 1a2 Committee of Allied Control Council Morgenthau Plan Court system Environment Currency reform Berlin Document Center Transition to State Department Allied High Commission Bonn, Germany - Allied High Commission - Secretariat 1,50-1,52 The French Office of Special Representative for Europe General 6illiam Draper Paris, France - Office of the Special Representative for Europe - Staff Secretary 1,52-1,54 U.S. Regional Organization 7USRO8 Cohn and Schine McCarthyism State Department - Staff Secretariat - Glo al Briefing Officer 1,54-1,55 Her ert Hoover, 9r. 9ohn Foster Dulles International Cooperation Administration 1,55-1,5, E:ecutive Secretary to the Administration Glo al development Area recipients P1480 Point Four programs Anti-communism Africa e:perts African e:-colonies The French 1and Grant College Program Ankara, Turkey -CENTO - U.S. Economic Coordinator 1,5,-1,63 Cooperation programs National tensions Environment Shah of Iran AID program Micro2ave projects Country mem ers Cairo, Egypt - Economic Officer 1,63-1,66 Nasser AID program Soviets Environment Surveillance P1480 agreement As2an Dam Family planning United Ara ic Repu lic 7UAR8 National
    [Show full text]
  • Misunderstood and Forgotten: the Greek Naval Mutiny of April 1944 Mark C
    Misunderstood and Forgotten 367 Misunderstood and Forgotten: The Greek Naval Mutiny of April 1944 Mark C. Jones Abstract After being driven from Greece by the German military in 1941, the Royal Hellenic Navy (RHN) operated alongside Britain’s Royal Navy (RN) from bases in Egypt, Lebanon, and Malta. In April 1944 the RHN experienced a widespread mutiny, which began in Alexandria, Egypt, over the political composition of the Greek government. This essay explores the importance of the Alexandria mutiny to the RHN. It investigates the role of the navy in the royalist/republican rivalry of the 1920s–1930s, the wartime return to service of republican officers, the RHN’s operations under British direction in the eastern Mediterranean, the political orientation of the government-in-exile, disturbances in the RHN prior to the mutiny, the events of the mutiny itself, the aftermath of the mutiny, how the mutiny affected the RN-RHN relationship, and the significance of the mutiny within the context of naval history in general. Wartime RN records held at the Public Record Office outside London, United States Navy intelligence reports held at the National Archives and Records Administration at College Park, Maryland, as well as unpublished and published secondary sources, provide the basis of this investigation. Multinational naval operations are a common occurrence in today’s world. While the United States Navy is presently the most powerful in the world, it frequently operates with ships from allied navies to reach its security goals. Such allied cooperation dates back to World War II when escort groups in the Battle of the Atlantic were composed of ships from the U.S., Canadian, and Royal Navies along with a handful of Polish, Free French, Norwegian, and Dutch ships.
    [Show full text]
  • The Three Revolutions of Syngman Rhee
    IKS and the History Department’s Center for Historical Research are pleased to co-sponsor: The Three Revolutions of Syngman Rhee Friday, January 18, 2019 3:00-4:30pm Dulles Hall 168 230 Annie and John Glenn Ave David Fields University of Wisconsin-Madison Abstract: In the pantheon of authoritarian strongmen of the Cold War, it is tempting to think of Syngman Rhee as the one we know the best. Prior to his return to Korea in 1945— courtesy of a War Department transport plane—Rhee spent nearly forty years in the United States. He earned degrees from Harvard and Princeton, spoke English fluently, and was a dedicated Christian to boot. He seemed tailor-made for the task of assisting the U.S. Army to occupy a country that did not want to be occupied. But Rhee was not returning to Korea as an American miracle man, but as a Korean revolutionary hero who had struggled against the power structures of the traditional Korean state and the Japanese occupation. Back on Kore- an soil he would lead a third revolution against both the last vestiges of the Chosun state– which the Japanese had largely left in place–and what he believed was a Soviet effort to subjugate the entire peninsula. This lecture will examine Syngman Rhee’s role as a revolu- tionary and what it can teach us about the Korean Independence Movement, the Division of Korea, and the Korean War. Bio: David P. Fields is the author of Foreign Friends: Syngman Rhee, American Excep- tionalism, and the Division of Korea (University Press of Kentucky, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • DONALD NICOL Donald Macgillivray Nicol 1923–2003
    DONALD NICOL Donald MacGillivray Nicol 1923–2003 DONALD MACGILLIVRAY NICOL was born in Portsmouth on 4 February 1923, the son of a Scottish Presbyterian minister. He was always proud of his MacGillivray antecedents (on his mother’s side) and of his family’s connection with Culloden, the site of the Jacobite defeat in 1745, on whose correct pronunciation he would always insist. Despite attending school first in Sheffield and then in London, he retained a slight Scottish accent throughout his life. By the time he left St Paul’s School, already an able classical scholar, it was 1941; the rest of his education would have to wait until after the war. Donald’s letters, which he carefully preserved and ordered with the instinct of an archivist, provide details of the war years.1 In 1942, at the age of nineteen, he was teaching elementary maths, Latin and French to the junior forms at St-Anne’s-on-Sea, Lancashire. He commented to his father that he would be dismissed were it known that he was a conscientious objector. By November of that year he had entered a Friends’ Ambulance 1 The bulk of his letters are to his father (1942–6) and to his future wife (1949–50). Also preserved are the letters of his supervisor, Sir Steven Runciman, over a forty-year period. Other papers are his diaries, for a short period of time in 1944, his notebooks with drawings and plans of churches he studied in Epiros, and his account of his travels on Mount Athos. This material is now in the King’s College London Archives, by courtesy of the Nicol family.
    [Show full text]
  • C.I. Clement, 'Enmity Over Amity: US Belligerence
    Enmity over Amity: US Belligerence toward Latin American Elected Governments Presented at the International Studies Association 2008 Annual Conference Do not cite or reproduce without the author’s permission. Christopher I. Clement Pomona College Department of Politics [email protected] Several works focusing on the use of covert operations by one democracy against another have challenged some of the central claims of democratic peace theory (DPT). Most notably, Forsythe (1992) shed light on the United States use of covert actions against elected governments in the Third World and suggested they might present some complications for DPT. James and Mitchell (1995) also found that powerful established democracies are likely to use covert actions when disputes arise with weaker democracies attempting to overcome their structural dependencies. If DPT were to include covert actions, its claims regarding the pacific relations among democracies would be less convincing. As Barkawi (2001:107) notes, the zone of peace among democracies “may not extend to core-periphery relations” and “would be considerably reduced, largely applicable only to a Western context where many other variables may account for the lack of war.” Forsythe (1992:393) offered two tentative explanations that transcend the Cold War. Borrowing from Michael Hunt (1988), he suggested a cultural predisposition of US leaders that consisted of “disdain for non-European politicians, fear of social revolution, and resentment that US leadership was rejected,” might have encouraged covert action. Forsythe also acknowledged that the targeted democracies may not have been considered “mature liberal states.” Thus a powerful, well-established democracy may use covert actions if it believes another democracy is “weak and poorly established” and incapable of resolving disputes at home and abroad peacefully.
    [Show full text]
  • 6Th South African Armoured Division
    6TH SOUTH AFRICAN ARMOURED DIVISION By J.C. von Winterbach, Scott Sutherland, Mike Bersiks, Rex Barret and Barry Cooper. Beginning The idea of a South African Armoured Division was born out of the chaos of the Western Desert Campaign, the Of- ficers in the 1st and 2nd South African Infantry Divisions felt the need for their own armour instead of depending on other Commonwealth Armoured Units. The formation of two strong Armoured Divisions was first discussed between Lt. Gen. G. E. Brink and rimeP Minister (Field Marshal) J.C. Smuts in April 1941. At that point time, South Africa was struggling to maintain the manpo- wer needed to sustain the 1st and 2nd Infantry Divisions in the field due to the political divisions in the Country. The 3rd South African Infantry Division was based in South Africa and provided the pool from which reinforcements were drawn to supplement the 1st and 2nd Infantry Divisions. A re-organisation committee met for the first time in May 1942 to discuss the armour option, it was decided to send three Infantry Battalions for armour training in August 1942, but the plan was rudely interrupted when Rommel launched his attack on the Gazala line in late May 1942. Nine days after the final El Alamein offensive the South African Divisions were pulling back to regroup. The plan was for the 1st Infantry Division that was withdrawn to Quassasin and that its 1st Brigade would return to South Africa to regroup with the 7th Infantry Brigade in Madagascar to form the 1st South African Armoured Division and the 1st Infantry Divisions 2nd and 3rd Brigades would remain in Egypt to form the 6th South African Armoured Division, which would replace the 2nd Infantry Division that had been captured at Tobruk in June 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • William Preston and the Revolutionary Settlement
    Journal of Backcountry Studies EDITOR’S NOTE: This is the third and last installment of the author’s 1990 University of Maryland dissertation, directed by Professor Emory Evans, to be republished in JBS. Dr. Osborn is President of Pacific Union College. William Preston and the Revolutionary Settlement BY RICHARD OSBORN Patriot (1775-1778) Revolutions ultimately conclude with a large scale resolution in the major political, social, and economic issues raised by the upheaval. During the final two years of the American Revolution, William Preston struggled to anticipate and participate in the emerging American regime. For Preston, the American Revolution involved two challenges--Indians and Loyalists. The outcome of his struggles with both groups would help determine the results of the Revolution in Virginia. If Preston could keep the various Indian tribes subdued with minimal help from the rest of Virginia, then more Virginians would be free to join the American armies fighting the English. But if he was unsuccessful, Virginia would have to divert resources and manpower away from the broader colonial effort to its own protection. The other challenge represented an internal one. A large number of Loyalist neighbors continually tested Preston's abilities to forge a unified government on the frontier which could, in turn, challenge the Indians effectivel y and the British, if they brought the war to Virginia. In these struggles, he even had to prove he was a Patriot. Preston clearly placed his allegiance with the revolutionary movement when he joined with other freeholders from Fincastle County on January 20, 1775 to organize their local county committee in response to requests by the Continental Congress that such committees be established.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain and the Greek Civil War, 1944–1949 British Imperialism, Public Opinion and the Coming of the Cold War
    Britain and the Greek Civil War, 1944–1949 British Imperialism, Public Opinion and the Coming of the Cold War JOHN SAKKAS Harrassowitz Verlag (Germany, 2013), 149 pp/28 illust. ISBN: 978-3-447-06718-8 The Greek civil war holds a significant place in the history of twentieth-century Europe for many reasons. Firstly, it was Europe’s bloodiest conflict in the second half of the 1940s; secondly, it marked a turning point in the Cold War; and lastly, it showed how Greece had become an ‘apple of discord’ for both American and Soviet involvement in Greek affairs which led to even more complexity in the country’s post-war politics. Yet despite its significance, only a limited number of studies have been carried out on the subject of this era. After the troubled period of the 1950s and 1960s, a time dominated by extreme conservatism, anti-communism and nationalist paroxysms, it was difficult to access material sources and this made it nearly impossible to conduct scholarly research, so that older politically-charged interpretations and accounts went mostly unchallenged. However, in the past two decades a new historiographical current has developed as regards the civil war in Greece and new evaluations and debates have emerged that shed fresh light on conventional supposition. Britain and the Greek Civil War, 1944–1949 draws upon the author’s doctoral dissertation and provides a welcome addition to studies on that period in Greek history. John Sakkas takes up a novel approach that does not focus solely on Greek politics, whether they are national or local, nor does it centre simply on British policy in Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Thesis: ABSTRACT CLASSIFYING BIAS
    ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis Directed By: Dr. David Zajic, Ph.D. Our project extends previous algorithmic approaches to finding bias in large text corpora. We used multilingual topic modeling to examine language-specific bias in the English, Spanish, and Russian versions of Wikipedia. In particular, we placed Spanish articles discussing the Cold War on a Russian-English viewpoint spectrum based on similarity in topic distribution. We then crowdsourced human annotations of Spanish Wikipedia articles for comparison to the topic model. Our hypothesis was that human annotators and topic modeling algorithms would provide correlated results for bias. However, that was not the case. Our annotators indicated that humans were more perceptive of sentiment in article text than topic distribution, which suggests that our classifier provides a different perspective on a text’s bias. CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Gemstone Honors Program, University of Maryland, 2018 Advisory Committee: Dr. David Zajic, Chair Dr. Brian Butler Dr. Marine Carpuat Dr. Melanie Kill Dr. Philip Resnik Mr. Ed Summers © Copyright by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang 2018 Acknowledgements We would like to express our sincerest gratitude to our mentor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiwi Unit Manual 2012
    RE-ENACTMENT MANUAL OF ELEMENTARY TRAINING 2nd N.Z.E.F. 1939-1945 N.Z. SECTION W.W.2 Historical Re-enactment Society 2O12 1 CONTENTS 2. INTRODUCTION 3. STANDING ORDERS 4. TRAINING SCHEDULE 6. STANDING ORDERS OF DRESS AND ARMS 7. UNIFORM AND INSIGNIA 8. SECTION UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS 9. SERVICE DRESS AND KHAKI DRILL 10. BATTLE DRESS UNIFORM 11. UNIFORMS AND HEADGEAR 12. UNIFORMS AND HEADGEAR 13. UNIFORMS OF NZ FORCES 14. UNIFORMS OF NZ FORCES (PACIFIC) 15. QUARTERMASTERS STORES 16. INSIGNIA 17. RANK 18. COLOUR INSIGNIA 19. FREYBURG AND THE DIVISION 20. COMMAND ORGANISATION 21. BRIGADE LAYOUT 22. COMMUNICATIONS PHOTO BY CLIFF TUCKEY/ KEVIN CARBERRY 23. THE EVOLUTION OF COMMONWEALTH TACTICS 24. THE EVOLUTION OF COMMONWEALTH TACTICS 25. SMALL UNIT TACTICS 26. BATTLE TECHNIQUES 27. CASUALTY EVACUATION 28. CASUALTY EVACUATION 29. MILITARY PROTOCOL 30. FOOT DRILL 31. ARMS DRILL 32. ARMS DRILL (BAYONETS) 33. S.M.L.E. RIFLE 34. BREN GUN, THOMPSON SMG, VICKERS 35. BAYONET, REVOLVERS, STEN GUN, BROWNING MMG 36. ORDANANCE AND SUPPORT WEAPONS 37. ARTILLERY 38. VEHICLES 39. BREN CARRIERS 40. 37 PAT WEBBING 41. 37 PAT WEBBING 42. EXTRA KIT 43. RATIONS AND SMALL PACK 44. NEW ZEALANDS WAR EFFORT- CHARTS AND TABLES 45. GETTING IT RIGHT –SOME COMMON CONFUSIONS 46. CARING FOR KIT 47. GLOSSARY 48. GLOSSARY 49. BIBLOGRAPHY 50. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 2 WORLD WAR II HISTORICAL RE-ENACTMENT SOCIETY NEW ZEALAND TRAINING & REFERENCE MANUAL AN INTRODUCTION. At first glance the New Zealand soldier in the Second World War resembled any Commonwealth soldier. From a distance of 20 yards they looked no different from Australian, Canadian, or British troops unless they happened to be wearing their 'lemon squeezers'.
    [Show full text]
  • The Partition of Korea After World War II This Page Intentionally Left Blank the PARTITION of KOREA AFTER WORLD WAR II
    The Partition of Korea after World War II This page intentionally left blank THE PARTITION OF KOREA AFTER WORLD WAR II A GLOBAL HISTORY Jongsoo Lee THE PARTITION OFKOREA AFTER WORLD WAR II © Jongsoo Lee, 2006. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2006 978-1-4039-6982-8 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. First published in 2006 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN™ 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 and Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England RG21 6XS Companies and representatives throughout the world. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin’s Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries. ISBN 978-1-349-53150-9 ISBN 978-1-4039-8301-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9781403983015 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lee, Jongsoo. The partition of Korea after world war II : a global history / Jongsoo Lee. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Korea—History—Partition, 1945– 2. World War, 1939–1945— Diplomatic history—Soviet Union. 3. World War, 1939–1945— Diplomatic history—United States. 4. Korea—History—Allied occupation, 1945–1948. I. Title. DS917.43.L44 2006 951.904Ј1—dc22 2005054895 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Design by Newgen Imaging Systems (P) Ltd., Chennai, India.
    [Show full text]
  • In a Rather Emotional State?' the Labour Party and British Intervention in Greece, 1944-5
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE 'In a rather emotional state?' The Labour party and British intervention in Greece, 1944-5 AUTHORS Thorpe, Andrew JOURNAL The English Historical Review DEPOSITED IN ORE 12 February 2008 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10036/18097 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication 1 ‘IN A RATHER EMOTIONAL STATE’? THE LABOUR PARTY AND BRITISH INTERVENTION IN GREECE, 1944-45* Professor Andrew Thorpe Department of History University of Exeter Exeter EX4 4RJ Tel: 01392-264396 Fax: 01392-263305 Email: [email protected] 2 ‘IN A RATHER EMOTIONAL STATE’? THE LABOUR PARTY AND BRITISH INTERVENTION IN GREECE, 1944-45 As the Second World War drew towards a close, the leader of the Labour party, Clement Attlee, was well aware of the meagre and mediocre nature of his party’s representation in the House of Lords. With the Labour leader in the Lords, Lord Addison, he hatched a plan whereby a number of worthy Labour veterans from the Commons would be elevated to the upper house in the 1945 New Years Honours List. The plan, however, was derailed at the last moment. On 19 December Attlee wrote to tell Addison that ‘it is wiser to wait a bit. We don’t want by-elections at the present time with our people in a rather emotional state on Greece – the Com[munist]s so active’.
    [Show full text]