DOCSLIB.ORG

Rosoboronexport, Spearhead of the Russian Arms Industry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rosoboronexport, Spearhead of the Russian Arms Industry Rosoboronexport, Spearhead of the Russian Arms Industry Louis-Marie Clouet September 2007 Russia/NIS Center The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a non partisan forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979 , Ifri is an independent state-approved organization. Created in March 2005 as the Brussels-based branch of Ifri, Eur-Ifri aims to contribute to the diversity of policy-thinking in Brussels with a view to stimulating the political debate and to feeding the decision- making process in the EU institutions. The opinions expressed in this book are the authors’ alone and do not reflect the official views of their institutions. Russia/NIS Center © All rights reserved – Ifri – Paris, 2007 ISBN IFRI EUR-IFRI 27 RUE DE LA PROCESSION 22-28, AVENUE D’AUDERGHEM 75740 PARIS CEDEX 15 – FRANCE B – 1040 BRUXELLES TEL. : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 TEL. : 32(2) 238 51 10 FAX : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 FAX : 32 (2) 238 51 15 E-MAIL : [email protected] E-MAIL : [email protected] WEBSITE : www.ifri.org L.-M. Clouet / Rosoboronexport, Spearhead of the Russian Arms Industry Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an electronic collection dedicated to Russia and other new independent states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan). Written by key experts, these policy-oriented papers deal with strategic and political as well as economic issues. This collection guarantees Ifri’s quality standards (editing and anonymous peer-review). If you wish to be notified of upcoming publications, please send an e-mail to: [email protected] Latest publications: - Oksana Antonenko, "Russia and the Deadlock over Kosovo", Russie.Nei.Visions, No. 21, July 2007; - Nadezhda Arbatova, "Russia-EU beyond 2007. Russian Domestic Debates“, Russie.Nei.Visions, No. 20, June 2007; - Arnaud Dubien, “The Opacity of Russian-Ukrainian Energy Relations”, Russie.Nei.Visions, No. 19, May 2007. © Ifri 1/19 L.-M. Clouet / Rosoboronexport, Spearhead of the Russian Arms Industry Author ouis-Marie Clouet holds a diploma from the Institut d'Etudes Politiques Lde Paris (Institute of Political Sciences) and a DESS (Post-Master of Specialized Studies Diploma) on the "Control of Armament and Disarmament" from the University of Marne-la-Vallée, France. He is currently completing a doctoral thesis at the University Pierre-Mendès- France Grenoble 2 devoted to the economy of Russian power and arms export since 1991, under Professor Jacques Fontanel's supervision. The thesis is funded by the French Ministry of Defense's General Delegation for Armaments. Published works include: "Grupa Thales" in Eksport Vooruzheniy (Tsentr Analiza Strategiy i Tekhnologiy, Moscow, No. 3, May- June 2006); "Armements et énergie, frères siamois de la nouvelle puissance russe?" [Arms and Energy, Twin Brothers of Russia's New Power ?] in Le Débat stratégique (Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherches sur la Paix et d'Etudes Stratégiques, Paris, No. 92, July 2007). © Ifri 2/19 L.-M. Clouet / Rosoboronexport, Spearhead of the Russian Arms Industry Contents AUTHOR ........................................................................................................2 CONTENTS.....................................................................................................3 SUMMARY......................................................................................................4 ROSOBORONEXPORT, PIVOT OF RUSSIAN ARMS EXPORTS .............................5 THE SYSTEM OF RUSSIAN MILITARY-TECHNICAL COOPERATION ...............................5 “COMMERCIAL PRAGMATISM” AND POLITICAL CONSTRAINTS.....................................7 ROE, CORE OF INDUSTRIAL REORGANIZATIONS .............................................9 KREMLIN’S PRIVILEGED INSTRUMENT ......................................................................9 A SPRAWLING INDUSTRIAL HOLDING COMPANY .....................................................10 MANAGING THE STRUCTURAL AND POLITICAL TRANSITION ...........................12 AN OPAQUE AND CRITICIZED SYSTEM ...................................................................12 MAKING CONSOLIDATION DURABLE .......................................................................13 SERGEY CHEMEZOV, NEW LORD OF THE RUSSIAN ARMS INDUSTRY..............14 ANNEX I: BIOGRAPHIES OF PEOPLE MENTIONED...........................................16 ANNEX II: THE RUSSIAN ARMS EXPORT SYSTEM ..........................................18 ANNEX III: ROSOBORONEXPORT AND THE RUSSIAN MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX (MIC)...........................................................................................19 © Ifri 3/19 L.-M. Clouet / Rosoboronexport, Spearhead of the Russian Arms Industry Summary osoboronexport, a federal state unitary enterprise, is at the heart of RRussian political power: it is the key pivot of the arms exports policy and of the ongoing consolidations of the Russian military-industrial complex (MIC). On behalf of its Director Sergey Chemezov, a close relation of President Vladimir Putin, Rosoboronexport has become the driving force for the renewal of Russia’s military-technical policy, as it benefits from a quasi monopoly on arms exports. Through Rosoboronexport, the Russian state is seeking to modernize the Russian MIC⎯token of the country’s power and influence on the international scene. In order to ensure the long-term success of its takeover operations of Russian industrial companies, Rosoboronoexport now needs to complete its transformation into an industrial holding company and strengthen its privileged position beyond the next Russian presidential elections to be held in 2008. © Ifri 4/19 L.-M. Clouet / Rosoboronexport, Spearhead of the Russian Arms Industry Rosoboronexport, Pivot of Russian Arms Exports erceiving it to be both an instrument of diplomatic leverage abroad and Pa vector of economic growth domestically, President Putin has placed the arms industry at the heart of Russian power. The arms export monopoly, Rosoboronexport (ROE), has become one of the key instruments of Russian foreign policy, which combines debt-reduction, hydrocarbons and arms. Since 2002 ROE has become an industrial holding company pivotal for the sectorial reorganizations undergone by the arms industry and, as such, has seized back control over industries deemed to be strategic. Chemezov’s strategy raises the same issues as those characteristic of Russian re-nationalizations: Kremlin-ROE relations, individual ambition and enrichment and procedural opacity. The System of Russian Military-Technical Cooperation Russian arms exports have grown steadily since 1998: from less than US$ 2 billion in 1998, they are expected to reach US$ 7 billion in 2007. According to President Putin, Russia’s order book totaled US$ 30 billion in March 2007, pending contracts included.1 In 2006, arms export deliveries reached a record US$ 6.5 billion, placing Russia at the second rank of world arms exporters behind the United Sates. In 2004, the top twenty Russian arms companies’ revenue depended on average over 70% on exports.2 The choice of centralization in terms of decision-making stemmed from the chaotic organization of the Russian arms trade in the 1990s along with the internecine competition between Russian companies and state agencies. Soon after he had been appointed Prime Minister on August 1999, Vladimir Putin chose someone close to him, Sergey Chemezov,3 to head Promexport, and subsequently ROE⎯the sole state agency born of Translated from French by Jessica Allevione. 1 “Russian Arms Exports Break a Record in 2006 (Putin)”, RIA Novosti, 20 March 2007, <http://fr.rian.ru/business/20070320/62298419.html>. 2 Estimations by the Center for Analyses of Strategies and Technologies (CAST) in Moscow. 3 See his biography in annex I. © Ifri 5/19 L.-M. Clouet / Rosoboronexport, Spearhead of the Russian Arms Industry the Rosvooruzhenie and Promexport’s merger.4 Set up in November 2000, ROE has the status of federal state unitary enterprise whose capital belongs entirely to the Federal State. It is in keeping with a renewed system for the control and promotion of arms exports, which includes:5 – the Commission for Military-Technical Cooperation, a steering body presided by the Russian President.6 ROE’s director is automatically member of this committee and may intervene in order to influence its decisions. – the Federal Service of Military-Technical Cooperation (FSMTC), headed by Mikhail Dmitriev,7 is in charge of controlling and issuing export licenses. Administratively, it is an offshoot of the Ministry of Defense, but is accountable directly to the President. It enforces the Commission’s decisions in military-technical cooperation policy. – ROE, the state enterprise in charge of prospecting, negotiating, finalizing and executing arms sales contracts. Officially, the right to export depends on the FSMTC, which is situated in the same buildings as ROE. In theory, therefore, the former may take back the latter’s export license. Yet it requires a presidential decree to appoint and dismiss ROE’s Director General. The current General Director, Sergey Chemezov, has direct access to President Putin, and makes use of it at will: unable to obtain the revocation of KBP Tula's license directly from FSMTC, for example, he simply asked Putin that the exportation of the Tunguska-M1 anti-aircraft defense systems be taken away from KBP Tula and come under Rosoboronexport's
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Presentation Is Made, Or by Reading the Presentation Slides, You Agree to the Following
    AEROFLOT GROUP Q3 & 9M 2020 IFRS R ESULTS 1 December 2020 Speakers: Andrey Chikhanchin – Deputy CEO for Commerce and Finance Andrey Panov – Deputy CEO for Strategy, Service and Marketing Ivan Batanov – Head of Revenue Management Disclaimer This document has been prepared by PJSC “Aeroflot” (the “Company”). By attending the meeting where the presentation is made, or by reading the presentation slides, you agree to the following. This document does not constitute or form part of any advertisement of securities, any offer or invitation to sell or issue or any solicitation of any offer to purchase or subscribe for, any securities of the Company in any jurisdiction, nor shall it or any part of it nor the fact of its presentation or distribution form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any contract or investment decision. No reliance may be placed for any purpose whatsoever on the information contained in this document or on assumptions made as to its completeness. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is given by the Company, its subsidiaries or any of their respective advisers, officers, employees or agents, as to the accuracy of the information or opinions or for any loss howsoever arising, directly or indirectly, from any use of this presentation or its contents. This document may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include matters that are not historical facts or statements regarding the Company’s intentions, beliefs or current expectations concerning, among other things, the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, strategies, and the market in which the Company operates.
    [Show full text]
  • De.Sputniknews.Com
    de.sputniknews.com The German-language site of Sputnik News, a Russian state-owned news agency that publishes propaganda and disinformation to serve Proceed with caution: This website severely violates basic the Kremlin’s interests. standards of credibility and transparency. Score: 12.5/100 Ownership and Sputnik Deutschland is a subsidiary of Rossiya Financing Segodnya, a Russian government-owned international Does not repeatedly publish news agency. Rossiya Segodnya was established in false content (22points) December 2013 by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Gathers and presents The international broadcasting service, Voice of Russia, information responsibly (18) and the state-run news agency, RIA Novosti, were Regularly corrects or clarifies dissolved and merged into Rossiya Segodnya. errors (12.5) Rossiya Segodnya launched Sputnik in November Handles the difference between news and opinion responsibly 2014. Sputnik Deutschland also runs the radio station (12.5) SNA-Radio, which broadcasts in collaboration with the Avoids deceptive headlines (10) Bavarian radio station Mega Radio. Website discloses ownership The site runs advertisements. and financing (7.5) Clearly labels advertising (7.5) Content Sputnik Deutschland covers international politics, Reveals who's in charge, business, science, technology, culture, and celebrities. including any possible conflicts It has a separate section for German news, which of interest (5) primarily covers politics and major crime stories. The site provides names of content creators, along with The site states on its About Us (Über Uns) page that it either contact or biographical “reports on global politics and business only for information (5) audiences abroad.” Sputnik is headquartered in Moscow, has bureaus in 34 countries, and produces Criteria are listed in order of content in 30 languages.
    [Show full text]
  • International Exhibition of Arm in Accordance with the Decisi Armenia
    Release for International Exhibition of Arms and Defence Technologies “ ArmHiTec-2020” In accordance with the decision of the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Armenia, the Third International Exhibition of Arms and Defence Technologies “ArmHiTec- 2020" will be held in the period 26-28 March, 2020 at the Exhibition Complex "ErevanEXPO" (Yerevan, Republic of Armenia). The main objective of the International Exhibition of Arms and Defence Technologies “ArmHiTec-2020" is to develop military-economic and strategic partnership of the Republic of Armenia with its partner-countries, as well as to develop high -tech industry spheres. In 2020 the exhibition broadens its thematic sections. Along with the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Armenia the co-organizers of the event are: - MOD of the Republic of Armenia State Military Industry Committee, being aimed at financing the military, scientific research projects, as well as end products. It allows the Committee to work closely with IT companies, carrying out the contracts in the spheres of hi- tech industries. - Ministry of Hi-Tech Industry of the Republic of Armenia, being primarily the digital sphere, military and hi-tech industries. Within the Ministry a new department, responsible for military-technical cooperation with foreign countries is currently being created. The thematic sections of the exhibition have been completed with IT tech, cyber security, engineering labs, and creative centers sections to contribute to the department’s goals realization . The Second International Exhibition of Arms and Defence Technologies “ArmHiTec - 2018” was held in a period from 29 to 31 of March on the territory of “YerevanExpo” center in the capital city of the Republic of Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovations and Technologies for the Navy and Maritime Areas
    Special analytical export project of the United Industrial Publishing № 04 (57), June 2021 GOOD RESULT ASSAULT BOATS IDEX / NAVDEX 2021 QATAR & SPIEF-2021 Military Technical Russian BK-10 Russia at the two Prospective mutually Cooperation in 2020 for Sub-Saharan Africa expos in Abu Dhabi beneficial partnership .12 .18 .24 .28 Innovations and technologies for the navy and maritime areas SPECIAL PARTNERSHIP CONTENTS ‘International Navy & Technology Guide‘ NEWS SHORTLY № 04 (57), June 2021 EDITORIAL Special analytical export project 2 One of the best vessels of the United Industrial Publishing 2 Industrial Internet of ‘International Navy & Technology Guide’ is the special edition of the magazine Things ‘Russian Aviation & Military Guide’ 4 Trawler Kapitan Korotich Registered in the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information 4 Finance for 5G Technology and Mass Media (Roscomnadzor) 09.12.2015 PI № FS77-63977 Technology 6 The largest propeller 6 Protection From High-Precision Weapons 8 New Regional Passenger Aircraft IL-114-300 The magazine ‘Russian Aviation & Military Guide’, made by the United Industrial 8 Klimov presents design of Publishing, is a winner of National prize ‘Golden Idea 2016’ FSMTC of Russia VK-1600V engine 10 Russian Assault Rifles The best maritime General director technologies Editor-in-chief 10 ‘Smart’ Target for Trainin Valeriy STOLNIKOV 10th International Maritime Defence Show – IMDS-2021, which is held from 23 to 27 June Chief editor’s deputy 2021 in St. Petersburg under the Russian Govern- Elena SOKOLOVA MAIN TOPICS ment decree № 1906-r of 19.07.2019, is defi- Commercial director 12 Military Technical nitely unique. Show is gathering in obviously the Oleg DEINEKO best innovations for Navy and different maritime Cooperation technologies for any tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Helicopters Experience and Innovation
    RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS EXPERIENCE AND INNOVATION © 2013 Russian Helicopters, JSC All rights reserved RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS AT A GLANCE Russian Helicopters, JSC is the sole manufacturer of “Mil” and “Kamov” civil and military helicopters. The company’s structure incorporates design bureaus, final assembly plants, components and parts manufacturers and service providers. Russian Helicopters consolidated the entire helicopter-building industry of Russia. We offer complete helicopter lifecycle from development to disposal. Russian Helicopters was founded in 2007 as a subsidiary of Oboronprom Corporation © 2013 Russian Helicopters, JSC All rights reserved FULLY INTEGRATED STRUCTURE Oboronprom TOTAL STAFF – 41,000 EMPLOYEES Russian Helicopters (98.5%) Mil Moscow Kazan Helicopters SMPP Helicopter Service Helicopter Plant (80.22%) (59.99%) Company (72.38%) (100.0%) Kamov Rostvertol Reduktor-PM (99.79%) (92.01%) (80.84%) Moscow and region NARP (9,000 employees) Kazan (95.1%) (6,500 employees) Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant (84.82%) Perm Progress Arsenyev (1,800 employees) Aviation Company Rostov-on-Don (93.14%) (7,900 employees) Kumertau Kumertau (4,000 employees) Novosibirsk Aviation PE (500 employees) (100.0%) Arsenyev (6,000 employees) Ulan-Ude (6,000 employees) © 2013 Russian Helicopters, JSC All rights reserved RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS AROUND THE WORLD Civil Total 37,530 Military Total 22,800 9% 91% 78% Civil Military Russian-made helicopters Key regions: account for nearly 14% of the Russia, CIS, India, China, Latin global fleet and are operated America,
    [Show full text]
  • Russia and Saudi Arabia: Old Disenchantments, New Challenges by John W
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 35 Russia and Saudi Arabia: Old Disenchantments, New Challenges by John W. Parker and Thomas F. Lynch III Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, and Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified combatant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Vladimir Putin presented an artifact made of mammoth tusk to Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman Al Saud in Riyadh, October 14–15, 2019 (President of Russia Web site) Russia and Saudi Arabia Russia and Saudia Arabia: Old Disenchantments, New Challenges By John W. Parker and Thomas F. Lynch III Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 35 Series Editor: Denise Natali National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2021 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's S-400 Dilemma
    EDAM Foreign Policy and Security Paper Series 2017/5 Turkey’s S-400 Dilemma July, 2017 Dr. Can Kasapoglu Defense Analyst, EDAM 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • This report’s core military assessment of a possible • In fact, modern air defense concepts vary between S-400 deal concludes that Ankara’s immediate aim is fighter aircraft-dominant postures, SAM-dominant to procure the system primarily for air defense missi- postures, and balanced force structures. However, if ons as a surface-to-air missile (SAM) asset, rather than Ankara is to replace its fighter aircraft-dominant con- performing ballistic missile defense (BMD) functions. cept with a SAM and aircraft mixed understanding, This priority largely stems from the Turkish Air Force’s which could be an effective alternative indeed, then currently low pilot-to-cockpit ratio (0.8:1 by open- it has to maintain utmost interoperability within its source 2016 estimates). Thus, even if the procurement principal arsenal. Key importance of interoperability is to be realized, Turkey will first and foremost operate between aircraft and integrated air and missile defense the S-400s as a stopgap measure to augment its air systems can be better understood by examining the superiority calculus over geo-strategically crucial areas. Israeli Air Force’s (IAF) recent encounter in the Syrian This is why the delivery time remains a key condition. airspace. On March 17, 2017, a Syrian S-200 (SA-5) battery fired an anti-aircraft missile to hunt down an • Although it is not a combat-tested system, not only IAF fixed-wing aircraft (probably an F-15 or F-16 Russian sources but also many Western military variant).
    [Show full text]
  • [Public Notice 10159] Guidance on Specified Persons Under Section
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/04/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-26087, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 4710-27 DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 10159] Guidance on Specified Persons Under Section 231 of the Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 ACTION: Guidance to specify persons that are part of, or operate for or on behalf of, the defense and intelligence sectors of the Government of the Russian Federation; notice. SUMMARY: The Department of State is issuing this guidance to specify the persons that are part of, or operate for or on behalf of, the defense and intelligence sectors of the Government of the Russian Federation. This guidance, including the list specifying persons, was developed through a robust interagency process and may be updated or amended as circumstances warrant. APPLICABLE DATES: The specification of persons identified in this notice pursuant to the Act is applicable on [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip A. Foley Director, Office of Counterproliferation Initiatives, Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, tel.: 202-647-5193, [email protected]. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the authority in Section 231(d) of the Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (Pub. L. 115-44), (“the Act”), the Secretary of State is issuing this guidance to specify the following as persons that are part of, or
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Military Developments and Strategic Implications
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 113–105] RUSSIAN MILITARY DEVELOPMENTS AND STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION HEARING HELD APRIL 8, 2014 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 88–450 WASHINGTON : 2015 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS HOWARD P. ‘‘BUCK’’ MCKEON, California, Chairman MAC THORNBERRY, Texas ADAM SMITH, Washington WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina LORETTA SANCHEZ, California J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia MIKE MCINTYRE, North Carolina JEFF MILLER, Florida ROBERT A. BRADY, Pennsylvania JOE WILSON, South Carolina SUSAN A. DAVIS, California FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island ROB BISHOP, Utah RICK LARSEN, Washington MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio JIM COOPER, Tennessee JOHN KLINE, Minnesota MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, Guam MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut TRENT FRANKS, Arizona DAVID LOEBSACK, Iowa BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania NIKI TSONGAS, Massachusetts K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas JOHN GARAMENDI, California DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia ROBERT J. WITTMAN, Virginia COLLEEN W. HANABUSA, Hawaii DUNCAN HUNTER, California JACKIE SPEIER, California JOHN FLEMING, Louisiana RON BARBER, Arizona MIKE COFFMAN, Colorado ANDRE´ CARSON, Indiana E. SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia CAROL SHEA-PORTER, New Hampshire CHRISTOPHER P. GIBSON, New York DANIEL B. MAFFEI, New York VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri DEREK KILMER, Washington JOSEPH J. HECK, Nevada JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas JON RUNYAN, New Jersey TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia SCOTT H.
    [Show full text]
  • US Sanctions on Russia
    U.S. Sanctions on Russia Updated January 17, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45415 SUMMARY R45415 U.S. Sanctions on Russia January 17, 2020 Sanctions are a central element of U.S. policy to counter and deter malign Russian behavior. The United States has imposed sanctions on Russia mainly in response to Russia’s 2014 invasion of Cory Welt, Coordinator Ukraine, to reverse and deter further Russian aggression in Ukraine, and to deter Russian Specialist in European aggression against other countries. The United States also has imposed sanctions on Russia in Affairs response to (and to deter) election interference and other malicious cyber-enabled activities, human rights abuses, the use of a chemical weapon, weapons proliferation, illicit trade with North Korea, and support to Syria and Venezuela. Most Members of Congress support a robust Kristin Archick Specialist in European use of sanctions amid concerns about Russia’s international behavior and geostrategic intentions. Affairs Sanctions related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are based mainly on four executive orders (EOs) that President Obama issued in 2014. That year, Congress also passed and President Rebecca M. Nelson Obama signed into law two acts establishing sanctions in response to Russia’s invasion of Specialist in International Ukraine: the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Trade and Finance Ukraine Act of 2014 (SSIDES; P.L. 113-95/H.R. 4152) and the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (UFSA; P.L. 113-272/H.R. 5859). Dianne E. Rennack Specialist in Foreign Policy In 2017, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the Countering Russian Influence Legislation in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (CRIEEA; P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    Aeroflot Group Investor Presentation December 2018 Disclaimer This document has been prepared by PJSC “Aeroflot” (the “Company”). By attending the meeting where the presentation is made, or by reading the presentation slides, you agree to the following. This document does not constitute or form part of any advertisement of securities, any offer or invitation to sell or issue or any solicitation of any offer to purchase or subscribe for, any securities of the Company in any jurisdiction, nor shall it or any part of it nor the fact of its presentation or distribution form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any contract or investment decision. No reliance may be placed for any purpose whatsoever on the information contained in this document or on assumptions made as to its completeness. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is given by the Company, its subsidiaries or any of their respective advisers, officers, employees or agents, as to the accuracy of the information or opinions or for any loss howsoever arising, directly or indirectly, from any use of this presentation or its contents. This document may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include matters that are not historical facts or statements regarding the Company’s intentions, beliefs or current expectations concerning, among other things, the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, strategies, and the market in which the Company operates. By their nature, forwarding-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Rostec Will Create a Single Corporate Aircraft Manufacturing Center in Moscow
    50SKYSHADESImage not found or type unknown- aviation news ROSTEC WILL CREATE A SINGLE CORPORATE AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING CENTER IN MOSCOW News / Manufacturer Image not found or type unknown © 2015-2021 50SKYSHADES.COM — Reproduction, copying, or redistribution for commercial purposes is prohibited. 1 Rostec State Corporation will unite UAC, Sukhoi and MiG companies into a single corporate aircraft manufacturing center, which will consolidate the management of aircraft programs and other UAC assets. The engineering and design functions of the group will be separated into a separate center, which will be located in Moscow - it will include all aviation design bureaus. Such decisions were announced by the General Director of the State Corporation Rostec Sergey Chemezov at a meeting with the management of the United Aircraft Corporation and its leading engineering centers, where the tasks of the development of the aircraft industry for the coming years were discussed. The objectives of the transformations being carried out are to increase the economic sustainability of the UAC Group, optimize the administrative and managerial staff, and reduce non-production costs and debt burden. To control the ongoing transformations, the head of Rostec, Sergey Chemezov, intends to personally head the UAC Board of Directors. The optimization will not affect the engineering staff. Design schools will remain independent, receive new opportunities for development, as well as improved working conditions in the format of the Unified Engineering and Design Center. The center will be located in Moscow, where the existing test and bench infrastructure of the UAC is concentrated. Moving aviation design bureaus to other regions is not on the agenda.
    [Show full text]