What Is the Difference Between Investing and Speculation?” Written in February 2013 for the CFA Institute’S Enterprising Investor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Is the Difference Between Investing and Speculation?” Written in February 2013 for the CFA Institute’S Enterprising Investor Investment Commentary Robert G. Hagstrom, CFA What is the Difference Between Chief Investment Officer Senior Portfolio Manager Investing and Speculation? February 18, 2021 Reddit, WallStreetBets, Robinhood, short selling and short squeezes, cryptocurrency, and special purpose acquisition companies (SPAC) have all lit up recent financial headlines. Rock stars and rappers are tweeting their best stock ideas to millions of traders. If you are going to win, “you have to be willing to lose it all” (1) has become the rally call for the “messiahs of momentum.” (2) One might be correct to think the stock market has lost its mind. However, this is not the finale but a recurring play on speculation that has periodically invaded markets since the first shares of common stock were traded on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange in 1602. And what unites these many speculative episodes throughout history has not so much been the reckless behavior of investors, but how the hyperactivity of wanting to make the most money in the shortest period of time can suck the oxygen out of the stock market for long-term investing. As mentioned, the tug-of-war between investing and speculation is nothing new. However, the persistent confusion over the difference is a mental mistake—some would say a chronic disease—that, too often, can become fatal for many investors. Benjamin Graham, the dean of security analysis, rightly warned that the greatest danger investors face is not so much speculation, but acquiring speculative habits without realizing they have done so. And in doing such, investors can end up with a speculator’s return by believing that they were investing. That individuals have not learned the difference between investing and speculation is arguably one of the most important unlearned lessons that still haunts investors. And the fact that there is still confusion is cause for concern—particularly during the current financial times. For this reason, we believe it is important to share with you the following commentary, “What is the Difference Between Investing and Speculation?” written in February 2013 for the CFA Institute’s Enterprising Investor. This commentary, written eight years ago, speaks to the ongoing challenge of distinguishing the differences between investing and speculation. As evidence, Enterprising Investor re-published the commentary this month, showing that now more than ever, it is critically important for investors to understand what is investing and what is speculation. CFA Institute Enterprising Investor February 2013 What is the Difference Between Investing and Speculation? By Robert G. Hagstrom, CFA What is the difference between investing and In his famous dialogues, de la Vega observed speculation? At first, the answer seems simple three classes of people. The princes of business— (1) Otani, Akane. “Teens because the distinction is obvious — that is, until called “financial lords,”—were the wealthy and Gambling Their you actually try to answer the question. investors. The merchants—occasional Savings on GameStop speculators— were the second class. The last Stock: Their Parents are Go ahead. Take a few seconds and think about it. class was called the “persistent speculators” or Worried.” The Wall Street Write down “investing.” Now write the definition. the “gamblers.” Journal. February 16, Do the same for “speculation.” If you are like me, 2021. frustration quickly builds because the answers do Since the Dutch shipping firm Vereenigde Oost-Indische became the first company to trade (2) Zweig, Jason. “How not come quickly or easily, and they should. After its shares on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange, the Stock Market Works all, these terms have been a part of the financial Now: Elon Musk Tweets, investors and speculators have coexisted in the lexicon since Joseph de la Vega wrote Confusion Millions Buy.” The Wall marketplace. Over that 400-year time period, the Street Journal. February of Confusions in 1688—the oldest book ever noteworthy have offered their own definitions of 12, 2021. written on the stock exchange business. investing and speculation, but none have stuck. Investment Commentary Philip Carret, who wrote The Art of Speculation the 20th century, was also a skilled buyer and (1930), believed “motive” was the test to seller of stocks, bonds, commodities, and determine the difference between investment currencies. In addition to thinking about and speculation. “The man who bought United economics, he was intrigued with the stock States Steel at $60 in 1915 in anticipation of market. Tucked inside his magnum opus, The selling at a profit is a speculator…On the other General Theory of Employment, Interest, and hand, the gentleman who bought American Money (1936), is a chapter titled “The State of Telephone at $95 in 1921 to enjoy the dividend Long Term Expectation.” Here, Keynes got right return of better than 8% is an investor.” Carret to the point, deciding to “appropriate the term connected the investor to the economics of the speculation for the activity of forecasting the business and the speculator to price. psychology of the market, and the term “Speculation,” wrote Carret, “may be defined as enterprise (a word he used for investment) for the the purchase or sale of securities or commodities activity of forecasting the prospective yield of in expectation of profiting by fluctuations in their assets over their whole life.” But the breadth of prices.” the chapter has less to do with the difficulty of Benjamin Graham, along with David Dodd, defining investment and speculation and more to attempted a precise definition of investing and do with the observation that the lines between speculation in their seminal work Security the two approaches had blurred. It is the same Analysis (1934). “An investment operation is one point that is driven home 75 years later in The which, upon thorough analysis, promises safety Clash of the Cultures: Investment vs. Speculation of principal and a satisfactory return. Operations (2012). In his book, John Bogle argued that in the not meeting these requirements are speculative.” minds of most individuals, investment and Despite being the “dean of security analysis,” speculation are now indistinguishable. Graham’s definition left readers wanting more — All market activity lies on a time continuum. a fact he confessed years later when he wrote The Moving from left to right, we observe buy and sell Intelligent Investor (1949). “While we have clung decisions in the stock market that occur in tenaciously to this definition,” said Graham, “it is microseconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, worthwhile noting the radical changes that have months, years, and decades. Although it is occurred in the use of the term ‘investor’ during unclear exactly where the demarcation line is this period.” located, it is generally agreed that activity Graham was concerned that the term “investor” occurring on the left side of the time continuum is was being applied ubiquitously to anyone and more likely to be speculation, whereas activity everyone who participated in the stock market. residing on the right side is thought to be He explained: “The newspaper employed the investing. In Bogle’s opinion, investment means word ‘investor’ in these instances because, in the long-term ownership whereas speculation is easy language of Wall Street, everyone who buys more short-term trading. Carret concurred, or sells a security has become an investor, writing: “The time requisite for the regardless of what he buys, or for what purpose, accomplishment of the adjustment of prices to or at what price, or whether for cash or on values is a factor of great weight to the margin.” Graham went on to say: “Since there is speculator. Here he parts company with the no single definition of investment in general investor, to whom it is of little concern.” acceptance, authorities have the right to define it Thinking long term or short term might be a pretty much as they please. Many of them deny sensible starting point that helps us distinguish that there is any useful or dependable difference between investing and speculation. But a between the concepts of investment and of “stopwatch” definition leaves us woefully short of speculation. We think this skepticism is what is ultimately needed to better understand unnecessary and harmful. It is injurious because it the differences between these two approaches. lends encouragement to the innate leaning of A time element is simply not sufficient. The many people toward the excitement and hazards distinction between investment and speculation of stock market speculation.” is more complex than this. John Maynard Keynes, best known as one of the Let me be clear. This not a sneaky attempt to founders of modern macroeconomics and demonize speculation and declare that only thought to be the most influential economist of investing is sacrosanct. Academic research clearly 2 What is the Difference Between Investing and Speculation? February 2021 Investment Commentary demonstrates that the market benefits the unavoidable.” But Graham was quick to participation of both investors and speculators. distinguish between “good” and “bad” Although some investment purists might vote for speculation. “There is intelligent speculation as opening the stock market just one day each year there is intelligent investing. But there are many and on that day all buyers and sellers would ways in which speculation may be unintelligent,” transact business, the lack of daily liquidity would wrote Graham. likely do more harm than good for the capital But how can we distinguish between what is markets. Furthermore, despite its negative “good speculation” and “bad speculation,” or connotation, it can be argued that some types of “good investment” and “bad investment” for speculation are, in fact, socially redeeming. Lynn that matter, when we don’t even have a firm Stout, Distinguished Professor of Corporate and grasp of the basic definitions? Lacking clearly Business Law at Cornell Law School, in understood boundaries, individuals are “Uncertainty, Dangerous Optimism, and wandering aimlessly back and forth between the Speculation: An Inquiry into Some Limits of worlds of investing and speculation.
Recommended publications
  • Chinese Privatization: Between Plan and Market
    CHINESE PRIVATIZATION: BETWEEN PLAN AND MARKET LAN CAO* I INTRODUCTION Since 1978, when China adopted its open-door policy and allowed its economy to be exposed to the international market, it has adhered to what Deng Xiaoping called "socialism with Chinese characteristics."1 As a result, it has produced an economy with one of the most rapid growth rates in the world by steadfastly embarking on a developmental strategy of gradual, market-oriented measures while simultaneously remaining nominally socialistic. As I discuss in this article, this strategy of reformthe mere adoption of a market economy while retaining a socialist ownership baseshould similarly be characterized as "privatization with Chinese characteristics,"2 even though it departs markedly from the more orthodox strategy most commonly associated with the term "privatization," at least as that term has been conventionally understood in the context of emerging market or transitional economies. The Russian experience of privatization, for example, represents the more dominant and more favored approach to privatizationcertainly from the point of view of the West and its advisersand is characterized by immediate privatization of the state sector, including the swift and unequivocal transfer of assets from the publicly owned state enterprises to private hands. On the other hand, "privatization with Chinese characteristics" emphasizes not the immediate privatization of the state sector but rather the retention of the state sector with the Copyright © 2001 by Lan Cao This article is also available at http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/63LCPCao. * Professor of Law, College of William and Mary Marshall-Wythe School of Law. At the time the article was written, the author was Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Maquetación 1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Liverpool Repository E AESTIMATIO, THE IEB INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE , 2017. : 8-25 DOI:10.5605/IEB.14.1 L 14 C © 2017 AESTIMATIO , THE IEB INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE I T R A H C R Herd behaviour: A E S E R A survey Kallinterakis, Vasileios Gregoriou, Greg N. ̈ RECEIVED : 6 JUNE 2016 ̈ ACCEPTED : 17 FEBRUARY 2017 Abstract This paper presents a survey of the extant research on herding, from both a theoretical and an empirical perspective. Theoretical research provides valuable insights into the key motives underlying investors’ tendencies to herd, while empirical evidence confirms the presence of herding – to varying degrees – internationally, both at the market level and for specific investor types. In future research there should be a greater focus on empirically testing herding intent, herding dynamics at high frequencies and other (non- equity) asset classes, who follows whom in the stock market, and whether herding can be profitably exploited. Keywords: Herding, Informational cascades, Institutional herding, Behavioural finance. JEL classification: G02, G10. 2 Please cite this article as: Kallinterakis, V. and Gregoriou, G.N. (2017). Herd behaviour: A survey, AESTIMATIO, The IEB International Journal of Finance, 14 , pp. 8-25. doi: 10.5605/IEB.14.1 Kallinterakis, V. PhD is Senior Lecturer in Finance at the University of Liverpool Management School (UK), Chatham Building, Chatham Street, Liverpool L69 7ZH, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected]. Gregoriou, G.N. PhD is Professor of Finance at the School of Business and Economics at State University of New York (Plattsburgh), 101 Broad Street, Plattsburgh, NY, 12901, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Speculation: Futures and Capitalism in India: Opening Statement
    Laura Bear, Ritu Birla, Stine Simonsen Puri Speculation: futures and capitalism in India: opening statement Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Bear, Laura, Birla, Ritu and Puri, Stine Simonsen (2015) Speculation: futures and capitalism in India: opening statement. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East. pp. 1-7. ISSN 1089-201X (In Press) © 2015 Duke University Press This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/61802/ Available in LSE Research Online: May 2015 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Speculation: Futures and Capitalism in India Opening Statement Laura Bear, Ritu Birla, Stine Simonsen Puri Keywords: Speculation, Divination, Finance, Economic Governance, Uncertainty, Vernacular Capitalism Speculation: New Vistas on Capitalism and the Global This special section of Comparative Studies in South Asia, Africa and Middle East investigates speculation as a crucial conceptual tool for analyzing contemporary capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today
    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Agreement and Disclosure Handbook
    Investor Agreement and Disclosure Handbook This document is intended to provide you, the investor, with important information regarding your agreement to terms and policies established between you and the Lincoln Investment Companies, as well as those disclosures required to be delivered by our regulatory authorities. Please read this information carefully as it pertains to your current investments, and may also be relevant to future investments. Retain this document for your records. If you have any questions regarding the information found within this document, please contact your financial professional. Information contained in this guide supersedes prior disclosures or Handbooks you may have received. CONTENTS TERMS AND CONDITIONS PRE-DISPUTE ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... I CUSTOMERS OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ..................................................................................................................................... II NATURE OF THE RELATIONSHIP ....................................................................................................................................................... III CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC DELIVERY ............................................................................................................................................. IV ERROR NOTIFICATION & CORRECTION POLICY ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mecca of Value Investing
    The mecca of Value Investing Subject: The mecca of Value Invesng From: CSH Investments <[email protected]> Date: 6/18/2019, 1:44 PM To: Randy <[email protected]> View this email in your browser Some of you know I'm a big believer in lifetime learning. It wasn't always the case. My early academic years were less than stellar. But I caught on fairly quickly and made do. By my late 20's I knew I wanted to be in finance. I had studied finance and economics in college but it didn't really grab me. Looking back partly it was me but also it was the way it was taught. Stodgy old theories that really didn't make any sense to me. The Efficient Market Theory for instance. EMT says basically that the markets are fully efficient. That stocks are perfectly priced therefore there aren't any bargains. You have absolutely nothing to gain from fundamental analysis and if you do it you are wasting your time. Yeah I thought but I knew there were guys who did exactly that. They did 1 of 5 6/18/2019, 4:48 PM The mecca of Value Investing their own research and found things that were mispriced. Most of them were quite wealthy. If the market is perfectly efficient as you say then how can they do it? And almost every theory had a list of assumptions you had to make. Here's one I love, every investor has the same information. Well, let's just be logical every investor doesn't have the same information and even if they did they would interpret differently.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Capitalism?
    University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 22 1988 Beyond Managerialism: Investor Capitalism? Alfred F. Conard University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons, and the Securities Law Commons Recommended Citation Alfred F. Conard, Beyond Managerialism: Investor Capitalism?, 22 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 117 (1988). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol22/iss1/5 This Symposium Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BEYOND MANAGERIALISM: INVESTOR CAPITALISM? Alfred F. Conard* Table of Contents Introduction ...................................... 118 I. The Rise and the Flaw of Managerialism ....... 120 A . T he Rise ................................ 120 B . T he Flaw ................................ 122 C. Patches on the Flaw ...................... 126 1. Shareholder derivative suits ............ 126 2. Shareholder democracy ................ 127 3. Independent directors ................. 128 4. Specific prohibitions ................... 130 II. The Investorial Alternative .................... 131 A. The Institutional Eruption ................ 131 B. The Concept of Investor Capitalism ........ 135 C. The New and the Old in Investor Capitalism 136 III. The Motivation of Institutional Investors ....... 139 A. The Players in Investor Capitalism ......... 140 1. Fund managers ....................... 140 2. Fund sponsors ........................ 141 3. Portfolio managers .................... 142 4. Investor services ...................... 143 B. The W all Street Rule ..................... 144 C. The "Collective Good" Dilemma ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Shareholder Capitalism a System in Crisis New Economics Foundation Shareholder Capitalism
    SHAREHOLDER CAPITALISM A SYSTEM IN CRISIS NEW ECONOMICS FOUNDATION SHAREHOLDER CAPITALISM SUMMARY Our current, highly financialised, form of shareholder capitalism is not Shareholder capitalism just failing to provide new capital for – a system driven by investment, it is actively undermining the ability of listed companies to the interests of reinvest their own profits. The stock shareholder-backed market has become a vehicle for and market-fixated extracting value from companies, not companies – is broken. for injecting it. No wonder that Andy Haldane, Chief Economist of the Bank of England, recently suggested that shareholder capitalism is ‘eating itself.’1 Corporate governance has become dominated by the need to maximise short-term shareholder returns. At the same time, financial markets have grown more complex, highly intermediated, and similarly short- termist, with shares increasingly seen as paper assets to be traded rather than long-term investments in sound businesses. This kind of trading is a zero-sum game with no new wealth, let alone social value, created. For one person to win, another must lose – and increasingly, the only real winners appear to be the army of financial intermediaries who control and perpetuate the merry-go- round. There is nothing natural or inevitable about the shareholder-owned corporation as it currently exists. Like all economic institutions, it is a product of political and economic choices which can and should be remade if they no longer serve our economy, society, or environment. Here’s the impact
    [Show full text]
  • Speculation in the United States Government Securities Market
    Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 2/25/2020 Se t m e 1, 958 p e b r 1 1 To Members of the Federal Open Market Committee and Presidents of Federal Reserve Banks not presently serving on the Federal Open Market Committee From R. G. Rouse, Manager, System Open Market Account Attached for your information is a copy of a confidential memorandum we have prepared at this Bank on speculation in the United States Government securities market. Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 2/25/2020 C O N F I D E N T I AL -- (F.R.) SPECULATION IN THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SECURITIES MARKET 1957 - 1958* MARKET DEVELOPMENTS Starting late in 1957 and carrying through the middle of August 1958, the United States Government securities market was subjected to a vast amount of speculative buying and liquidation. This speculation was damaging to mar- ket confidence,to the Treasury's debt management operations, and to the Federal Reserve System's open market operations. The experience warrants close scrutiny by all interested parties with a view to developing means of preventing recurrences. The following history of market events is presented in some detail to show fully the significance and continuous effects of the situation as it unfolded. With the decline in business activity and the emergence of easier Federal Reserve credit and monetary policy in October and November 1957, most market elements expected lower interest rates and higher prices for United States Government securities. There was a rapid market adjustment to these expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Government Through Privatization
    20th Anniversary Edition Annual Privatization Report 2006 Transforming Government Through Privatization Reflections from Pioneers in Government Reform Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher Governor Mitch Daniels Governor Mark Sanford Robert W. Poole, Jr. Reason Foundation Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, apply- ing, and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets, and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists, and opin- ion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition, and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and prog- ress. Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed research and directly engages the policy pro- cess, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge, and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individuals and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations, and corporations. The views expressed in these essays are those of the individual author, not necessarily those of Reason Foundation or its trustees. Copyright © 2006 Reason Foundation. Photos used in this publication are copyright © 1996 Photodisc, Inc. All rights reserved. Authors Editor the Association of Private Correctional & Treatment Organizations • Leonard C. Gilroy • Chris Edwards is the director of Tax Principal Authors Policy Studies at the Cato Institute • Ted Balaker • William D. Eggers is the global director • Shikha Dalmia for Deloitte Research—Public Sector • Leonard C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intelligent Investor
    THE INTELLIGENT INVESTOR A BOOK OF PRACTICAL COUNSEL REVISED EDITION BENJAMIN GRAHAM Updated with New Commentary by Jason Zweig An e-book excerpt from To E.M.G. Through chances various, through all vicissitudes, we make our way.... Aeneid Contents Epigraph iii Preface to the Fourth Edition, by Warren E. Buffett viii ANote About Benjamin Graham, by Jason Zweigx Introduction: What This Book Expects to Accomplish 1 COMMENTARY ON THE INTRODUCTION 12 1. Investment versus Speculation: Results to Be Expected by the Intelligent Investor 18 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 1 35 2. The Investor and Inflation 47 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 2 58 3. A Century of Stock-Market History: The Level of Stock Prices in Early 1972 65 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 3 80 4. General Portfolio Policy: The Defensive Investor 88 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 4 101 5. The Defensive Investor and Common Stocks 112 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 5 124 6. Portfolio Policy for the Enterprising Investor: Negative Approach 133 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 6 145 7. Portfolio Policy for the Enterprising Investor: The Positive Side 155 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 7 179 8. The Investor and Market Fluctuations 188 iv v Contents COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 8 213 9. Investing in Investment Funds 226 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 9 242 10. The Investor and His Advisers 257 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 10 272 11. Security Analysis for the Lay Investor: General Approach 280 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 11 302 12. Things to Consider About Per-Share Earnings 310 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 12 322 13. A Comparison of Four Listed Companies 330 COMMENTARY ON CHAPTER 13 339 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Providing the Regulatory Framework for Fair, Efficient and Dynamic European Securities Markets
    ABOUT CEPS Founded in 1983, the Centre for European Policy Studies is an independent policy research institute dedicated to producing sound policy research leading to constructive solutions to the challenges fac- Competition, ing Europe today. Funding is obtained from membership fees, contributions from official institutions (European Commission, other international and multilateral institutions, and national bodies), foun- dation grants, project research, conferences fees and publication sales. GOALS •To achieve high standards of academic excellence and maintain unqualified independence. Fragmentation •To provide a forum for discussion among all stakeholders in the European policy process. •To build collaborative networks of researchers, policy-makers and business across the whole of Europe. •To disseminate our findings and views through a regular flow of publications and public events. ASSETS AND ACHIEVEMENTS • Complete independence to set its own priorities and freedom from any outside influence. and Transparency • Authoritative research by an international staff with a demonstrated capability to analyse policy ques- tions and anticipate trends well before they become topics of general public discussion. • Formation of seven different research networks, comprising some 140 research institutes from throughout Europe and beyond, to complement and consolidate our research expertise and to great- Providing the Regulatory Framework ly extend our reach in a wide range of areas from agricultural and security policy to climate change, justice and home affairs and economic analysis. • An extensive network of external collaborators, including some 35 senior associates with extensive working experience in EU affairs. for Fair, Efficient and Dynamic PROGRAMME STRUCTURE CEPS is a place where creative and authoritative specialists reflect and comment on the problems and European Securities Markets opportunities facing Europe today.
    [Show full text]