Jennifer's World Tracking the Source of Novel Coronavirus Gene Sequencing: When the Alarm Goes Off FEB 26 (Jennifer's Note: Th

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jennifer's World Tracking the Source of Novel Coronavirus Gene Sequencing: When the Alarm Goes Off FEB 26 (Jennifer's Note: Th Jennifer's World Tracking the Source of Novel Coronavirus Gene Sequencing: When the Alarm Goes Off FEB 26 (Jennifer’s note: The following is the English translation mainly done by google translate of a report on a Chinese website at http://archive.is/untHJl. The original Chinese article has been removed. But the link is here. I have removed the reporters’ names to reduce the exposure and their possible pressure for doing this important investigation.) Tracing to the source, as of February 24, more than 2660 people have died and more than 77,000 people have been diagnosed with the novel coronavirus, a novel coronavirus similar to SARS. When was it found? Caixin reporters conducted interviews from various sources and sorted out relevant papers and database materials. By piecing together all sorts of information, the full picture is gradually emerging. All kinds of evidence show that before the end of December last year, no less than nine samples of unknown pneumonia cases were collected from hospitals in Wuhan. Gene sequencing showed that the pathogen was a SARS-like coronavirus. These test results were reported back to the hospital and reported to the Health Commission and Disease Control System. Until January 9th, CCTV reported that the "Wuhan Viral Pneumonia Pathogen Testing Results Preliminary Evaluation Expert Group" officially announced the pathogen as "novel coronavirus". The Test Result of the First Case Came Out as Early as Dec. 27 On December 15, 2019, a 65-year-old male delivery man in the South China Seafood Market started having a fever. On December 18, he came to the emergency department of the Wuhan Central Hospital (Nanjing Road District) to see a doctor. The doctor suspected that it might be community-acquired pneumonia, and admitted him to the emergency department ward of the hospital. Community-acquired pneumonia is a generic term for pneumonia caused by a variety of microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, chlamydia, and mycoplasma. The main clinical symptoms are cough, with or without sputum, and chest pain. On December 22, the patient became iller and entered the ICU. Doctors used various antibiotics to treat him, but without any good result. Professor Zhao Su, the chief physician of the Department of Respiratory Medicine of Wuhan Central Hospital, told Caixin reporter that on December 24, a deputy chief physician of Respiratory Medicine took a bronchoscopy sample from the patient, and then sent the patient's alveolar lavage fluid sample to the first Tripartite testing agency Guangzhou Weiyuan Gene Technology Co., Ltd. conducts NGS testing, hoping to use its second-generation high-throughput gene sequencing technology (mNGS) based on metagenomics to find pathogens. Alveolar lavage is a treatment that removes inflammatory secretions in the alveoli and improves respiratory function. For lower respiratory tract and lung diseases, the content of pathogens in alveolar lavage fluid is higher than that of throat swabs. Weiyuan Gene is the full name of Guangzhou Weiyuan Gene Technology Co., Ltd., established in June 2018. Its job advertisement states that it focuses on precision medicine in oncology and infectious etiology, and has a sequencing platform (NGS) based on second-generation high-throughput sequencing technology. "Since the start of BGI's sequencing technology, many gene sequencing companies have appeared in China. In recent years, at our various medical seminars, the second-generation high-throughput gene sequencing technology has been continuously introduced. These companies have also sent medicines. Delegates went to major hospitals to preach. "Zhao Su told Caixin reporter. BGI (300676.SZ) is called Shenzhen BGI Gene Co., Ltd., formerly known as Beijing BGI Gene Research Center, and was established in 1999. It has successively completed a number of international human genome projects in China, rice and the giant panda genome project, with genomic research with an international advanced level. In July 2017, it was listed on the GEM under the title of “The First Gene Sequencing Unit” and is the world's largest genomics R & D institution. Another doctor from Wuhan Union Medical College Hospital also introduced, "One test, with 6 million base sequences, costs 3,000 yuan. If with 3000 yuan’s cost, we can find out what virus or bacteria the pathogen is, it may save lives." Generally speaking, the gene-sequencing company should feedback on the test results three days later, that is, December 27, but Weiyuan Gene did not give a written report. "They just called us and said it was a new coronavirus." Zhao Su said. At this time, the patient was transferred to Wuhan Tongji Hospital on December 25. On February 21, 2020, the genetic test information of this case was disclosed by an article of WeChat account "Wei Yuan Gene". The official article wrote that the Chinese Journal of Medical Sciences (English version) published a paper on January 27, introducing the discovery of new coronaviruses, and "Wei Yuan Gene" involved in the early discovery of new coronaviruses. The aforementioned paper published in the Chinese Medical Journal (English version) refers to the article "Identifying a New Coronavirus that Causes Severe Pneumonia in Humans: A Descriptive Study" published on January 29. The authors are from the Institute of Pathogen Biology of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences / Peking Union Medical College (hereinafter referred to as the Institute of Pathogens of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences), China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control, Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Wuhan Central Hospital, Guangzhou Weiyuan Gene Technology Co., Ltd. and other units. Xu Teng, the chief technology officer of Weiyuan Gene, is the co-first author of the paper, and CEO Yongjun Li and chief operating officer Wang Xiaorui are the authors. Li Yongjun was a former bioinformatics analyst at the Institute of Pathogens, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. According to the paper, the researchers collected clinical data and bronchoalveolar lavage samples from five patients with severe pneumonia at Jinyintan Hospital of Wuhan, Hubei Province, and performed pathogenic metagenomics (mNGS) analysis. As a result, a coronavirus with 79% similarity to the nucleotide sequence of the SARS virus had never been reported in these samples. The article shows that among the samples of these five patients, the earliest clinical sample for genetic sequencing was a 65-year-old patient sample collected on December 24. He developed symptoms on December 15 with symptoms of high fever, cough, and low sputum. He was admitted on the 18th and admitted to the ICU on December 22. After 16 days, she continued to have a high fever and developed severe shortness of breath. Agreeing with the above information is also an article entitled "Recording the First Discovery of a New Coronavirus" published by WeChat account "Hill Dog" on January 28. The author claimed to work in a private enterprise located in Huangpu, Guangzhou in the message area. The article records: "I just went to work on December 26, 2019, and I would like to take a look at the results of the automatic interpretation of mNGS pathogenic microorganisms as usual. As a surprise, It was found that one sample reported a sensitive pathogen, SARS coronavirus, with dozens of sequences, and this sample only had such a meaningful pathogen. I was anxious, and quickly checked the detailed analysis data in the background, and found that the similarity was not It is very high, only about 94.5%. In order to confirm the reliability of the results, a detailed analysis was started. The analysis results of the exploration version suggest that this pathogen is most similar to Bat SARS like coronavirus, with an overall similarity of 87% The similarity with SARS is about 81%. " According to the author, the sample collection time for this patient was December 24th. The article mentioned, "The front-end feedback is that this patient is seriously ill and is anxious to test the results, but such a major pathogen cannot be reported easily. At noon, I had an emergency meeting with several leaders and decided to continue in-depth analysis and delay the release of reports. Share the data with the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences for analysis. " The Institute of Pathogens of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences is one of the authors of the above-mentioned "Chinese Medical Journal (English Version)" thesis and Li Yuanjun, CEO of Weiyuan Gene, previously served as the Institute of Pathogens of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, directly under the director of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Academician Wang Chen, vice president of the Chinese Academy of Engineering. On December 27, the laboratory assembled a nearly complete viral genome sequence, and the data was also shared with the Institute of Pathogens, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. "It can basically be confirmed that this patient's sample does indeed contain a new virus similar to Bat SARS-like coronavirus." The article wrote, "The information obtained at the time was that this patient had returned to his hometown and did not rule out contact with bats. Realized the potential of the problem Severity, the laboratory was completely cleaned and disinfected, the samples were harmlessly destroyed, and relevant personnel of the experimental operation conducted relevant monitoring. The doctor had been communicated before noon, and the patient was also isolated. " "It should be that we discovered this new coronavirus for the first time." The article "Little Dog" also gave a screenshot of the GISAID database. "From the data submitted on the GISAID database website, it is also us that collected the earliest samples." GISAID is a global influenza virus sharing data platform. After registration, researchers can upload the virus gene sequences they extracted. Each strain will have a unique number, and the time of collection, submission date, submission laboratory, etc.
Recommended publications
  • Disputa Subterrânea
    NOTAS 1 Raízes tingidas de pés de pimentão plantados próximos uns Disputa subterrânea aos outros: ramificação concentrada perto Uma equipe de pesquisadores dos Estados Unidos, da Espanha e do Brasil conseguiu explicar do caule o comportamento geral do crescimento das raízes das plantas. Alguns experimentos sugeriam que a concorrência por água e nutrientes do solo levava plantas vizinhas a promoverem um maior crescimento de suas raízes. Outros indicavam que as plantas localizadas próximas umas às outras ge- ravam raízes que ocupavam menos espaço. Um novo modelo teórico, desenvolvido com auxílio do físi- co Ricardo Martínez-García, do Instituto Sul-americano para Pesquisa Fundamental (ICTP-SAIFR) e do Instituto de Física Teórica da Universidade Estadual Paulista (IFT-Unesp), leva em conta ambas observações. O modelo prevê que as raízes se espalham menos na presença de vizinhas, ao mesmo tempo que compensam a perda de território aumentando sua ramificação próxima do próprio caule. A previsão foi confirmada em um experimento com uma variedade de pimentão cultivada em estufa por 11 meses, mapeando a distribuição das raízes das plantas no solo (Science, 4 de dezembro). Os pesquisadores esperam que essa constatação possa orientar melhorias na agricultura, permitindo a otimização do plantio, e levar ao aprimoramento dos modelos de previsão de mudanças no clima, me- lhorando a estimativa de quanto carbono as plantas armazenam em suas raízes. 12 | JANEIRO DE 2021 2 A maior e mais antiga cobra-cega Paleontólogos do campus de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (USP) identificaram a maior e mais antiga cobra-cega, uma forma de serpente de hábitos subterrâneos e olhos reduzidos.
    [Show full text]
  • China Confronts Covid-19
    CHINA CONFRONTS COVID-19 By DAKE KANG and COLLEAGUES Associated Press STORY TK | ASSOCIATED PRESS 1 of 2 CRACKDOWN IN CHINA 1. CHINA DIDN’T WARN PUBLIC OF LIKELY PANDEMIC FOR 6 KEY DAYS April 15, 2020: Top Chinese ofcials secretly determined they were likely facing a pandemic from a new coronavirus in mid-January, ordering preparations even as they downplayed it in public. https://apnews.com/article/68a9e1b91de4fc166acd6012d82c2f9 2. CHINA DELAYED RELEASING CORONAVIRUS INFO, FRUSTRATING WHO June 3, 2020: Even as the World Health Organization publicly praised China, it privately complained about the lack of information it was getting on the new coronavirus. https://apnews.com/article/3c061794970661042b18d5aeaaed9fae 3. CHINA TESTING BLUNDERS STEMMED FROM SECRET DEALS WITH FIRMS Dec. 3, 2020: Secrecy and cronyism crippled China’s testing capacity in the early days of the outbreak, an Associated Press investigation has found. https://apnews.com/article/china-virus-testing-secret-deals-frms- 312f4a953e0264a3645219a08c62a0ad TABLE OF CONTENTS | ASSOCIATED PRESS https://apnews.com/article/68a9e1b91de4fc166acd6012d82c2f9 1 Xie Huanchi/Xinhua via AP Chinese President Xi Jinping talks by video with patients and medical workers at the Huoshenshan Hospital in Wuhan in central China’s Hubei Province in a video released March 10, 2020. April 15, 2020 China didn’t warn public of likely pandemic for 6 key days By ASSOCIATED PRESS Associated Press In the six days after top Chinese ofcials secretly determined they likely were facing a pandemic from a new coronavirus, the city of Wuhan at the epicenter of the disease hosted a mass banquet for tens of thousands of people; millions began traveling through for Lunar New Year celebrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Dokumentation Des COVID-19-Ausbruchs: Zeitleiste
    Dokumentation des COVID-19-Ausbruchs: Zeitleiste JOURNALISMUS MEIN BERICHT https://web.archive.org/web/20210611015902/https://www.jenniferzengblog.com/home/2021/6/1 0/documentary-of-covid-19-outbreak-timeline (Anmerkung von Jennifer: Dieses Dokument enthält hauptsächlich chinesische Nachrichtenberichte über COVID-19, die zu Beginn des Ausbruchs (vom 1. Dezember bis 31. Januar) veröffentlicht wurden. Einige davon wurden von chinesischen Nachrichtenmedien und lokalen chinesischen Regierungen veröffentlicht Hinweise auf die mögliche Absicht der chinesischen Regierung, die Epidemie zum Schweigen zu bringen und zu vertuschen. Viele Artikel wurden später aus dem Internet gelöscht, aber eine Gruppe von Interessierten hat sie auf GitHub gespeichert. Sie organisieren die Archive in einer Zeitleiste mit dem Zweck, "zu bewahren". Geschichte, damit die Wahrheit im Laufe der Zeit nicht verborgen oder vergessen wird. Die ursprüngliche Zeitleiste ist auf Chinesisch. Dies ist eine englische Übersetzung, damit westliche Leser auch die Wahrheit hinter dem Covid-19-Ausbruch erfahren können. Dies ist ein übersetztes Dokument. Das Originaldokument ist in (Chinesisch): https://web.archive.org/web/20200419085730/https://github.com/Pratitya /COVID-19-timeline/blob/master/TIMELINE.md 1. Dezember 2019 · Der erste Einwohner von Wuhan hatte Symptome einer ungeklärten Lungenentzündung (nach der Diagnose war es zu diesem Zeitpunkt eine unbekannte Lungenentzündung mit unbekannter Ursache und kein Arzt gefunden und gemeldet). Laut Wu Wenxuan, Direktor der Intensivstation (ICU) des Jinyintan Krankenhauses, war der Patient ein Mann in den 70ern mit einem leichten Hirninfarkt und Alzheimer. Nachdem er krank wurde, wurde er in ein anderes Krankenhaus in Wuhan eingeliefert, aber als sich sein Zustand verschlechterte, wurde er am 29. Dezember in das Jinyintan-Krankenhaus verlegt.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of a Recombinant Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Expressing the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus 2 Spike Protein
    Characterization of a recombinant Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara expressing the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 spike protein von Alina Tscherne, M.Sc. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde (Dr. rer. biol. vet.) der Tierärztlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Characterization of a recombinant Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara expressing the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 spike protein von Alina Tscherne, M.Sc. aus Voitsberg (Österreich) München 2021 Aus dem Veterinärwissenschaftlichen Department der Tierärztlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Lehrstuhl für Virologie Arbeit angefertigt unter der Leitung von: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Gerd Sutter Mitbetreuung durch: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Asisa Volz Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Tierärztlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Dekan: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Reinhard K. Straubinger, Ph.D. Berichterstatter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Gerd Sutter Korreferentin: Priv.-Doz. Dr. Simone M.-L. Renner Tag der Promotion: 17. Juli 2021 Für meine Familie Die vorliegende Dissertationsschrift enthält wissenschaftliche Daten, die im Journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) veröffentlicht wurden: Alina Tscherne, Jan Hendrik Schwarz, Cornelius Rohde, Alexandra Kupke, Georgia Kalodimou, Leonard Limpinsel, Nisreen M.A. Okba, Berislav Bošnjak, Inga Sandrock, Sandro Halwe, Lucie Sauerhering, Katrin Brosinski, Liangliang Nan, Elke Duell, Sylvia Jany, Astrid Freudenstein, Jörg Schmidt, Anke Werner, Michelle Gellhorn Sera, Wolfgang Guggemos, Michael Seilmaier, Clemens- Martin Wendtner, Reinhold Förster, Bart L. Haagmans, Stephan Becker, Gerd Sutter, Asisa Volz “Immunogenicity and efficacy of the COVID-19 candidate vector vaccine MVA-SARS-2-S in preclinical vaccination”, erschienen am 13.07.2021 (doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026207118.) Table of Contents VI TABLE OF CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Incidence and Impact Estimates of the Coronavirus Outbreak from Wuhan Before Lockdown
    Evaluating Incidence and Impact Estimates of the Coronavirus Outbreak from Wuhan before Lockdown Mai He, M.D., Ph.D., 1 Li Li, M.A.2, Louis P. Dehner, M.D.1 1. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA 2. AT&T, Bedminster, NJ 07921, USA Corresponding author: Mai He, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA Phone: (314) 273-1328 Email: [email protected] 1 Abstract Background: Wuhan, China was the original epicenter of COVID-19 pandemic. The goal of the current study is to understand the infection transmission dynamics before intervention measures were taken, such as issuing a lockdown for the city and other social distancing policies. Methods: Data and key events were searched through pubmed for medical literature and internet for Chinese government announcements and Chinese media reports. Epidemiological data including R0 and infection were calculated using data extracted from variety of data sources. Results: We established a timeline emphasizing evidence of human-to-human transmission. By January 1, 2020, Chinese authorities had been presented convincing evidence of human-to-human transmission; however, it was until January 20, 2020 that this information was shared with the public. Our study estimated that there would have been 10,989 total infected cases if interventions were taken on January 2, 2020, vs 239,875 cases when lockdown was put in place on January 23, 2020. Conclusions: China’s withholding of key information about the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic and its delayed response ultimately led to the largest public health crisis of this century and could have been avoided with earlier countermeasures.
    [Show full text]
  • Centro De Medicina Y Especialidades Acevedo Díaz 1024 Y Bvar
    Año XIV | Edición 151 | Diciembre 2020 | www.comunicacionsalud.com.uy p. La historia detrás del abrazo p. No, las vacunas de ARN frente a p. Diferencias clínicas entre la primera 04 de un médico a un desconsolado 12 la Covid-19 no modicarán 20 y la segunda ola de Covid-19 paciente con Covid-19 que nuestro genom.a conmovió la redes sociales. 1 DE DICIEMBRE Día Mundial de la Lucha Contra el VIH/SIDA Cada 1 de diciembre se celebra el Día Mundial de la Lucha contra el Sida. Este día es una oportunidad para apoyar a aquellos involucrados en la lucha contra el VIH y para mejorar la comprensión del VIH como un problema de salud pública mundial. El VIH sigue siendo un importante problema mundial de salud pública y al igual que muchas otras cuestiones principales, el VIH plantea retos adicionales durante la pandemia de Covid-19. El colapso de los servicios esenciales relativos al VIH provocado por la pandemia de Covid-19 está poniendo en peligro muchas vidas. El personal sanitario y los representan- tes comunitarios de todo el mundo están haciendo todo lo posible por mantener esos servicios en funcionamiento, mediante la adopción de medios innovadores para superar los trastornos provocados por la Covid-19 en los servicios. Centro de Medicina y Especialidades Acevedo Díaz 1024 y Bvar. España 2401.6686 - 2402.0244 [email protected] www.cmeuruguay.org NOTICIAS DE LA PANDEMIA Infectólogo uruguayo: "El tapabocas llegó para quedarse, porque lo de la vacuna es una quimera" La vacuna contra la Covid-19 es todavía una quimera y no va a suponer un cambio drástico al actual escenario, en el que el tapabocas llegó para quedarse, dijo en entrevista con Sputnik el infectólogo Álvaro Galiana, uno de los asesores del Gobierno uruguayo sobre la enfermedad causada por el coronavirus.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychological Status and Behavior Changes of the Public During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China
    Liu et al. Infectious Diseases of Poverty (2020) 9:58 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-020-00678-3 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Psychological status and behavior changes of the public during the COVID-19 epidemic in China Xi Liu1†, Wen-Tao Luo1,2†, Ying Li1,3†, Chun-Na Li1, Zhong-Si Hong1, Hui-Li Chen1, Fei Xiao1 and Jin-Yu Xia1* Abstract Background: A cluster of pneumonia cases were reported by Wuhan Municipal Health Commission, China in December 2019. A novel coronavirus was eventually identified, and became the COVID-19 epidemic that affected public health and life. We investigated the psychological status and behavior changes of the general public in China from January 30 to February 3, 2020. Methods: Respondents were recruited via social media (WeChat) and completed an online questionnaire. We used the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Self-rating Depression Scale, and Symptom Checklist-90 to evaluate psychological status. We also investigated respondents’ behavior changes. Quantitative data were analyzed by t-tests or analysis of variance, and classified data were analyzed with chi-square tests. Results: In total, 608 valid questionnaires were obtained. More respondents had state anxiety than trait anxiety (15.8% vs 4.0%). Depression was found among 27.1% of respondents and 7.7% had psychological abnormalities. About 10.1% of respondents suffered from phobia. Our analysis of the relationship between subgroup characteristics and psychological status showed that age, gender, knowledge about COVID-19, degree of worry about epidemiological infection, and confidence about overcoming the outbreak significantly influenced psychological status. Around 93.3% of respondents avoided going to public places and almost all respondents reduced Spring Festival-related activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Journal of Science Frontier Research:I Interdisciplinary
    Online ISSN : 2249-4626 Print ISSN : 0975-5896 DOI : 10.17406/GJSFR RootCauseAnalysis SurfaceDefectDetection AnticovidianV.2:COVID-19 AcceptabilityofCoffeeBlends VOLUME20ISSUE3VERSION1.0 Global Journal of Science Frontier Research:I Interdisciplinary Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: I Interdisciplinary Volume 20 Issue 3 (Ver. 1.0) Open Association of Research Society Global Journals Inc. © Global Journal of Science (A Delaware USA Incorporation with “Good Standing”; Reg. Number: 0423089) Frontier Research. 2020 . Sponsors:Open Association of Research Society Open Scientific Standards All rights reserved. This is a special issue published in version 1.0 Publisher’s Headquarters office of “Global Journal of Science Frontier Research.” By Global Journals Inc. Global Journals ® Headquarters All articles are open access articles distributed 945th Concord Streets, under “Global Journal of Science Frontier Research” Framingham Massachusetts Pin: 01701, Reading License, which permits restricted use. United States of America Entire contents are copyright by of “Global USA Toll Free: +001-888-839-7392 Journal of Science Frontier Research” unless USA Toll Free Fax: +001-888-839-7392 otherwise noted on specific articles. No part of this publication may be reproduced Offset Typesetting or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including Glo bal Journals Incorporated photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written 2nd, Lansdowne, Lansdowne Rd., Croydon-Surrey, permission. Pin: CR9 2ER, United Kingdom The opinions and statements made in this book are those of the authors concerned. Packaging & Continental Dispatching Ultraculture has not verified and neither confirms nor denies any of the foregoing and no warranty or fitness is implied.
    [Show full text]
  • China Cancer Delivers the Virus of the Century
    CHAPTER 2: CHINA CANCER DELIVERS THE VIRUS OF THE CENTURY 1. THE CORONAVIRUS: ARE BATS THE CULPRITS? Virus exposes China’s true nature Suppose that physicians who consider themselves China specialists had examined the agglomeration of cancer cells that is China in the past. Nine out of 10 of them would have predicted a rosy outcome for their “patient.” They would have said, “Oh, don’t worry! China is experiencing growing pains now, and there is still an imbalance between the mental and the physical. We just need to provide nutrients (capital and technology). As intellectual growth proceeds, China will become a fine adult. Just wait and see!” But recently a growing number of physicians have begun to wonder: “This patient’s behavior is abnormal. Could this be cancer?” “After all this time the patient’s condition should have returned to normal.” Even some Japanese physicians are now skeptical. But most of them, when examining the patient, conclude that it is best to adopt a wait-and-see policy. Why? Because even when confronted with Chinese-style tyranny, most Japanese ignore it, confident that it will not affect them directly. Unfortunately, the Wuhan coronavirus burst onto the scene, and spread through the world at lightning speed. It has affected every inhabitant of this planet either directly or indirectly; it is impossible to ignore. Not only those who have contracted it, and their families, but also people who have not been infected, have been forced to take preventive measures. Interaction with others has been held to a minimum, and those who dare to venture outside must practice social distancing.
    [Show full text]
  • RAMOS RIERA, I., COVID-19. Zugzwang Hacia Oriente
    COVID-19: ZUGZWANG HACIA ORIENTE Ignacio Ramos Riera. Profesor de Relaciones Internacionales en la Universidad Pontificia Comillas ([email protected]) Research published in the issue n. 62 of the “Boletín Cátedra China”: https://www.catedrachina.com/single-post/2020/05/20/Covid-19-Zugzwang-Hacia-Oriente En ajedrez el Zugzwang (literalmente “coerción a mover”) es una situación ideal donde generalmente el rey enemigo es conducido a una casilla a la que no querría ir de forma que su situación estratégica empeora. Se trata de un arrinconamiento que se produce cuando le toca mover al contrincante, pero las piezas rivales no le permiten más que una cierta alternativa que suele dejarle peor de lo que estaba. En estos tiempos convulsos, diferentes líderes de países importantes del mundo occidental o anglosajón están levantando la voz con un movimiento incisivo de alfil a lo largo de la gran diagonal que llega hasta Oriente, más en concreto hasta China. Los gobiernos de EE. UU., Francia, Australia o Gran Bretaña han realizado últimamente declaraciones públicas poniendo en cuestión la credibilidad del gobierno de la RP China en la gestión y comunicación de la epidemia, no solo con respecto a sus fases primigenias, sino hasta el día de hoy. Confrontados con el vuelco radical de sus presupuestos nacionales, tienen premura por colocar a China en Zugzwang. Sin embargo, la legítima competitividad entre los viejos dominadores del tablero global y la resurgente superpotencia que tendrá lugar en la nueva era post-COVID-19, debería ir acompañada de algunas ganancias en la conciencia colectiva de lo que son movimientos precipitados que pueden malograr la partida.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Health Organization Must Answer These Hard Questions in Its Coronavirus Inquiry
    7/17/2020 The World Health Organization must answer these hard questions in its coronavirus inquiry Academic rigour, journalistic flair The World Health Organization must answer these hard questions in its coronavirus inquiry May 21, 2020 12.17am AEST Authors Lai-Ha Chan Senior Lecturer in International Relations, University of Technology Sydney Pak K Lee Senior Lecturer in Chinese Politics and International Relations, University of Kent Wuhan: questions remain over China’s initial response to the coronavirus. Tom Kuo/EPA https://theconversation.com/the-world-health-organization-must-answer-these-hard-questions-in-its-coronavirus-inquiry-138959 1/5 7/17/2020 The World Health Organization must answer these hard questions in its coronavirus inquiry If the World Health Organization (WHO) wants to maintain its legitimacy on the world stage, it must now answer some tough questions about the extent it has kowtowed to China during the coronavirus pandemic. It now has a chance to do so, after its members agreed to adopt a resolution for an inquiry into the global handling of the pandemic at a virtual meeting of its annual World Health Assembly on May 19. But there are still many other questions that need to be answered before it can restore its credibility. We have studied China’s engagement with global health institutions such as the WHO, China’s compliance with global public health norms and how far it succeeds in creating and promoting its own norms around the world. Amid the global crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic, which has infected nearly five million people and killed more than 320,000 in just a few short months, understanding the relationship between China, where the outbreak began, and the WHO is crucial to the future of global public health.
    [Show full text]
  • Did a Review of Samples Collected from a Mineshaft Cause the COVID-19 Pandemic?
    Did a Review of Samples Collected from a Mineshaft Cause the COVID-19 Pandemic? Abstract The origin of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has been hotly debated. Proponents of the natural spillover theory allege that the virus jumped species, possibly via an intermediary host, to cross over to humans via the wildlife trade or by other means. Proponents of a rival theory allege that the virus escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan. This research presents circumstantial evidence of a transmission route via a late 2019 review of samples collected from a mineshaft in Mojiang, Yunnan Province, China. It examines the activity at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in late 2019, when samples from a mineshaft associated with a suspected SARS outbreak were being reviewed. It proposes that spillover occurred during this review of samples including of a virus (BtCoV/4991) only 1% different to SARS-CoV-2 in its RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). It also proposes that the chance of identifying the outbreak may have been reduced by the issuance of new influenza guidance in November 2019. Introduction Several Wuhan laboratories conducted research into SARS or SARS-related coronaviruses in the years prior to the pandemic. These include facilities at Huazhong University, the Wuhan Center for Disease Control (WHCDC), the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and Wuhan University (WU). This research focuses on a program connecting these institutions and presents information supporting a potential spillover event due to mishandling of a sample or specimen stored at the WIV in late 2019. This is proposed to have taken place during a well-documented review of samples and specimens collected under the multiyear program that identified the closest known virus to SARS-CoV-2.
    [Show full text]