Core 1..36 Committee (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Transparency International Canada Inc
Transparency International Canada Inc. COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE MECHANISM FOR FOLLOW-UP ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION IN CANADA OF THE CONVENTION PROVISIONS SELECTED FOR REVIEW IN THE THIRD ROUND, AND ON FOLLOW-UP TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS FORMULATED TO THAT COUNTRY IN PREVIOUS ROUNDS. I - INTRODUCTION 1. Contents of the Report a. This report presents, first, a review of the implementation in Canada of the Inter- American Convention against Corruption selected by the Committee of Experts of the Follow-up Mechanism (MESICIC) for review in the third round: Article III, paragraphs 7 and 10, and Articles VIII, IX, X and XIII. b. Second, the report will examine the follow up to the recommendations that were formulated by the MESICIC Committee of Experts in the previous rounds, which are contained in the reports adopted by the Committee and published at the following web pages: i. http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/mec_rep_can.pdf (First Round) ii. http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/mesicic_II_inf_can_en.pdf (Second Round) c. This report was prepared primarily based on inputs from members including Directors of Transparency International Canada. The Directors of Transparency International Canada and its members comprise an extensive resource of experience. There is a significant representation from members of the legal profession engaged in international trade practices and from the accountancy profession – in particular those engaged in forensic practices. There is representation from academics and from industry. d. Mr. Thomas C. Marshall, Q.C., is the Vice-chair and Director of Transparency International Canada, and Chair of the International Development Committee of 1 the Canadian Bar Association. -
The Mulroney-Schreiber Affair - Our Case for a Full Public Inquiry
HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA THE MULRONEY-SCHREIBER AFFAIR - OUR CASE FOR A FULL PUBLIC INQUIRY Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics Paul Szabo, MP Chair APRIL, 2008 39th PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION The Speaker of the House hereby grants permission to reproduce this document, in whole or in part for use in schools and for other purposes such as private study, research, criticism, review or newspaper summary. Any commercial or other use or reproduction of this publication requires the express prior written authorization of the Speaker of the House of Commons. If this document contains excerpts or the full text of briefs presented to the Committee, permission to reproduce these briefs, in whole or in part, must be obtained from their authors. Also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire: http://www.parl.gc.ca Available from Communication Canada — Publishing, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9 THE MULRONEY-SCHREIBER AFFAIR - OUR CASE FOR A FULL PUBLIC INQUIRY Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics Paul Szabo, MP Chair APRIL, 2008 39th PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ACCESS TO INFORMATION, PRIVACY AND ETHICS Paul Szabo Pat Martin Chair David Tilson Liberal Vice-Chair Vice-Chair New Democratic Conservative Dean Del Mastro Sukh Dhaliwal Russ Hiebert Conservative Liberal Conservative Hon. Charles Hubbard Carole Lavallée Richard Nadeau Liberal Bloc québécois Bloc québécois Glen Douglas Pearson David Van Kesteren Mike Wallace Liberal Conservative Conservative iii OTHER MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO PARTICIPATED Bill Casey John Maloney Joe Comartin Hon. Diane Marleau Patricia Davidson Alexa McDonough Hon. Ken Dryden Serge Ménard Hon. -
Schreiber V. Canada (A.G.)
Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies Volume 8 Article 7 1-1-1999 Schreiber v. Canada (A.G.) Robert J. Currie Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/djls This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Recommended Citation Robert J Currie, "Schreiber v. Canada (A.G.)" (1999) 8 Dal J Leg Stud 207. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Schulich Law Scholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies by an authorized editor of Schulich Law Scholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SCHREIBER v. CANADA (ATTORNEY GENERAL) 207 SCHREIBER v. CANADA (ATTORNEY GENERAL) BY ROBERT J. CURRIEt The Airbus scandal has been a matter of fairly intense political interest since initial allegations of influence-peddling were made against several parties, including former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. 1 Of legal note, however, has been a challenge mounted by another party implicated by the Department of Justice's investigation into the matter, which has recently been pronounced upon by the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court's judgment in Schreiber v. Canada (Attorney General) 2 provides an interesting view of conflicting societal values: the Charter-guaranteed freedom from unreasonable search and seizure raised in opposition to the state's interest in efficient and unfettered means through which to combat crime with a transnational aspect. The Schreiber case is significant as an indicator both of the Court's evolving view of the limits of the application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 3 and of the Court's perception of the course being charted for Canada's participation in the fight against international crime. -
Wendy Hui-Kyong Chun
final version published in differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 11.1 (1999) 112-149 Unbearable Witness: Toward a Politics of Listening Wendy Hui Kyong Chun * On Wednesday, 6 December 1989, around 5 P.M., Marc Lepine (né Gamil Roderigue Gharbi) dressed in hunting garb entered a classroom in the École Polytechnique. Disturbing a presentation by Eric Chavarie, he waved a .22- caliber rifle and ordered the men and women into opposite corners of the classroom. Thinking it was a joke arranged to relieve the tedium of the last hour of the term, no one moved. A single gunshot persuaded them otherwise. Next, Lepine ordered the men to leave. Alone with the women, he stated, "I am here to fight against feminism that is why I am here." Nathalie Provost, a 23- year-old mechanical engineering student, argued, "Look, we are just women studying engineering, not necessarily feminists ready to march on the streets to shout we are against men, just students intent on leading a normal life." Lepine responded, "You're women, you're going to be engineers. You're all a bunch of feminists. I hate feminists." He then opened fire, killing six women- -and closing the discussion. After leaving the classroom, Lepine stalked through the halls of the school saying, "I want the women." Lepine killed himself at approximately 5:35 p.m., his gun still loaded and the police not yet in sight. The total death count: fourteen women and Marc Lepine. And then the discussion reopened. The unexpected horror of this "American-style carnage" (Pelletier 33) shocked most Canadians and defied them to make sense of the worst one-day massacre in Canadian history. -
The Conflict Between the Harper Conservatives and the Federal Bureaucracy
DRAFT for discussion only Not for publication without the permission of the author Strained Relations: The Conflict Between the Harper Conservatives and the Federal Bureaucracy Brooke Jeffrey Department of Political Science Concordia University Abstract A series of highly publicized confrontations between the Harper Conservatives and senior government officials, as well as their direct intervention in the operation of arms’ length agencies, elimination of advisory bodies and rejection of expert advice, have led many observers to conclude the Harper government is at war with its public service. These developments raise a number of broader questions. Is the Harper government’s troubled relationship with the federal bureaucracy merely a continuation of a trend established by previous Conservative governments, based on suspicion, mistrust and a deep-seated conviction that the public service is biased in favour of the Liberal Party? Or does it reflect a significant departure from the norm, grounded in differing values and beliefs about the appropriate role of government and public servants? Using empirical evidence and a comparative methodology, this paper will examine the record of the Mulroney and Harper governments in light of five fundamental principles of a modern merit-based bureaucracy – neutrality, anonymity, professional expertise, rules-based decision-making, and arms’-length relationships – in an effort to determine whether the Harper Conservatives are indeed taking a qualitatively different approach to the bureaucracy and the machinery of government. Canadian Political Science Association 2011 Annual Conference Waterloo, Ontario May 17, 2011 “The reality is that we will have for some time to come,,, a Liberal civil service…” Conservative Party leader Stephen Harper January 17, 2006 Introduction When Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party came to power in 2006 public servants were already wary of his new government. -
G1612-B PCO Text French
Commission Oliphant Le rapport est en trois volumes : 1 Résumé; 2 Enquête sur les faits; et 3 Politiques et conclusions et recommandations consolidées. La table des matières dans chaque volume est complète pour ce volume et abrégée pour les deux autres volumes. Les conclusions et recommandations consolidées sont également incluses dans le volume 1. De plus, trois études indépendantes préparées pour la Commission ont été publiées séparément dans un volume intitulé Les questions de politiques publiques et la Commission Oliphant. Commission d’enquête concernant les allégations au sujet des transactions financières et commerciales entre Karlheinz Schreiber et le très honorable Brian Mulroney Rapport Volume 3 Politiques et conclusions et recommandations consolidées L’honorable Jeffrey J. Oliphant Commissaire © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada représentée par la ministre des Travaux publics et des Services gouvernementaux 2010 No de cat. : CP32-92/2-2010F-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-94462-3 Catalogage avant publication de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada Commission d’enquête concernant les allégations au sujet des transactions financières et commerciales entre Karlheinz Schreiber et le très honorable Brian Mulroney (Canada) Commission d’enquête concernant les allégations au sujet des transactions financières et commerciales entre Karlheinz Schreiber et le très honorable Brian Mulroney : rapport. Commissaire : Jeffrey J. Oliphant. Vol. 1 bilingue (anglais et français); Vol. 2 et 3 publiés séparément en versions unilingues. Publié aussi en anglais sous le titre : Commission of Inquiry into Certain Allegations Respecting Business and Financial Dealings Between Karlheinz Schreiber and the Right Honourable Brian Mulroney, report. Sommaire complet : v. 1. Résumé -- v. 2. Enquête sur les faits -- v. -
Tuesday, December 17, 1996
CANADA 2nd SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT VOLUME 136 NUMBER 64 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, December 17, 1996 THE HONOURABLE GILDAS L. MOLGAT SPEAKER CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue.) Debates: Victoria Building, Room 407, Tel. 996-0397 Published by the Senate Available from Canada Communication Group — Publishing, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa K1A 0S9, at $1.75 per copy or $158 per year. Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1395 THE SENATE Tuesday, December 17, 1996 The Senate met at 2:00 p.m., the Speaker in the Chair. aware of this, but then again, perhaps she is too busy reading the newspaper. Prayers. I fear that this sort of reckless disregard may be typical of the manner in which the Liberal government plans to manage all of SENATORS’ STATEMENTS our cultural affairs. We have no long-term strategy, no blueprint for the future. That lends even more credibility to my call for a study in the Senate of our cultural situation. I know senators HERITAGE CANADA across the way are very supportive of that idea, as are my own colleagues. BUDGET CUTS TO CANADIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION—ADVERSE EFFECT ON CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS (1410) Hon. Janis Johnson: Honourable senators, I am very The Liberals have already demonstrated that the policies concerned about the Liberal government’s stewardship of this outlined in the Red Book are no longer operative. My concern is nation’s cultural institutions. When elected, the Liberals above and beyond partisan politics. What is the long-term plan promised stable, long-term financing for the CBC. -
Mulroney's Shadows: the Many Images of Canada's Eighteenth
1 Mulroney’s Shadows: The Many Images of Canada’s Eighteenth Prime Minister A paper prepared for the annual meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, University of British Columbia, June 2008 Jonathan Malloy Department of Political Science Carleton University [email protected] All politicians leave mixed legacies. But among Canadian politicians, Brian Mulroney may stand unique. Other leaders have left contradictory images - John A. MacDonald as the nation-building alcoholic, or Mackenzie King, the great compromiser who talked to spirits and his dog. Pierre Trudeau stands especially as a compelling and remarkable figure that defies easy summary. But perhaps no leader has left such a marvelously complex, contradictory and still- evolving legacy as Canada’s eighteenth prime minister - Brian Mulroney. The public legacy of Brian Mulroney is truly multifaceted. It spans ideologies and deeply intertwines his own person with his policy accomplishments. Mulroney pleases few and angers many, but for different and at times contradictory reasons. Mulroney has multiple images - among them are a harsh ideologue, a milquetoast pleaser, an obsession with polls, deep indifference to public opinion, a slick operator whose slickness was exposed continually, a statesman and possibly a crook. At the core of all this instability and multiple images is a complex personality and ego that continually surprises and disappoints. Only Pierre Trudeau comes close to offering the same complexities. Cohen and Granatstein wrote in Trudeau’s Shadow (1998) that “No other Canadian public figure has ever retained such power to move his country almoist fifteen years after leaving office. No one else in office either has ever had his power to galvanize opinion. -
{PDF EPUB} the Secret Mulroney Tapes Unguarded Confessions of a Prime Minister by Peter C
Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} The Secret Mulroney Tapes Unguarded Confessions of a Prime Minister by Peter C. Newman The Secret Mulroney Tapes. The Secret Mulroney Tapes: Unguarded Confessions of a Prime Minister is a biography of former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, by writer and former Mulroney confidant Peter C. Newman. Contents. Content and controversies of the book Mulroney's reaction CBC special Mulroney lawsuit References External links. The book was released by Random House Canada on September 12, 2005. Content and controversies of the book. The book is based on hours of taped interviews, amounting to more than 7400 pages of transcripts, with Mulroney himself, family, friends, colleagues and contemporaries. In the book, Mulroney opens up his darkest secrets and his innermost thoughts. In the interviews, he proclaimed himself the greatest Prime Minister since John A. Macdonald, and claimed that Pierre Trudeau opposed the Meech Lake Accord to try to destroy him. Mulroney claims that "Trudeau's contribution was not to build Canada but to destroy it, and I had to come in to save it." Mulroney describes his successor Kim Campbell as a "very vain person who blew the 1993 election because she was too busy screwing around with her Russian boyfriend" (Gregory Lekhtman), resulting in "the most incompetent campaign I've seen in my life." Campbell responded to the news by saying that Mulroney just wanted a "scapegoat who would bear the burden of his unpopularity". Mulroney's reaction. Via a spokesman, Mulroney said he was "devastated" and "betrayed" by Newman. He went further, saying "I was reckless in talking with Peter C. -
Brian Mulroney Gives Speech Praising Harper CTV.Ca News Staff Updated
Brian Mulroney gives speech praising Harper CTV.ca News Staff Updated: Sat. Apr. 24 2004 8:40 AM ET Former Tory prime minister Brian Mulroney picked New Brunswick to give his first speech to the new Conservative Party. In a 45-minute speech in Moncton Saturday night, he praised new leader Stephen Harper -- an implacable ideological enemy in the 1980s -- as a man who can take the Conservatives back to power. "This is the kind of party Stephen Harper is leading: a moderate, successful Conservative party," he told about 600 people who had paid $500 per plate. "I tell you, that in this room and every room like this across Canada, if we rise together in solidarity and support, the Conservative Party will live again!" Mulroney was believed to be supporting auto parts executive Belinda Stronach behind the scenes during her unsuccessful run for the Conservative leadership. He was a public supporter of the effort to merge the Tories and the Canadian Alliance. Harper, Mulroney and New Brunswick Premier Bernard Lord, who some had wanted to see run for the new party's leadership, mingled together during the fundraiser, a symbol of unity. "That's the way it used to be, for 125 years. Then it took a 10-year hiatus, and now we're all back together," Mulroney told CTV. The right-wing split Mulroney won a massive landslide in 1984, after people decided they had enough after almost 16 unbroken years of Liberal rule (Tory leader Joe Clark formed a minority government in 1979, but it only lasted eight months). -
Through the Frosted Glass: Practical Advice and Trends Towards Transparency in the Law
cba.org National Administrative Law/Labour and Employment Law CLE Conference THROUGH THE FROSTED GLASS: PRACTICAL ADVICE AND TRENDS TOWARDS TRANSPARENCY IN THE LAW Presented by the National Administrative The premier CLE event returns for administrative law lawyers and labour Law Section, the Labour and Employment and employment law practitioners. Law Section, and the Continuing Legal Education Committee The only conference in Canada to balance practical hands-on guidance November 24-25, 2006 The Westin Ottawa with broad overviews, this year’s event features the return of prominent Ottawa, Ontario and well-received speakers, such as leading administrative law author David Phillip Jones, Q.C., Canada’s Chief Legislative Counsel John Mark Keyes, and the authoritative James Sprague. On the Labour Law side, registrants will immediately recognize key authors and practitioners, such as Robert Bonhomme, Richard J. Charney, and Eric Durnford, Q.C. SPONSOR Featuring best-selling author and renowned journalist Stevie Cameron, the CLE’s line-up also includes human rights lawyer Julius Grey and a panel of judges drawn from across the country, candidly discussing how the courts handle both practice issues and hard legal questions in administrative law and labour and employment law. Presented at downtown Ottawa’s Westin Hotel, this CLE event is a must for lawyers, judges, and tribunal members who want to improve their skills and understanding of these areas of the law. This program has been accredited by the Labour Law Specialty Committee of the Law Society of Upper Canada for 5.5 hours towards the professional development requirement for certi- CONFERENCE ORGANIZERS fication. -
The Overview: Four Models of Police-Government Relationships
1 THE OVERVIEW: FOUR MODELS OF POLICE-GOVERNMENT RELATIONSHIPS By Kent Roach1 Abstract This chapter provides an introduction to police-governmental relations in Canada. It does so by outlining the law and history of police-government relations in Canada, constructing four different models of police-governmental relations and identifying critical issues that distinguish different approaches to police independence. The first part of the chapter examines the contested legal basis for claims of police independence from government with a focus on the Supreme Court of Canada’s pronouncements on this issue in R. v. Campbell and Shirose. The second part examines highlights of the history of police-government relationships. Controversies such as the Nicholson affair, the Airbus, Doug Small and Sponsorship Scandal cases are examined, as well as the contributions of the McDonald, Marshall and APEC inquiries to thinking about the proper relation between the police and the government. The third part of the chapter constructs four ideal models of police-government relations in order to highlight the range of value choice and policy options. The models are full police independence in which the police are immune from governmental intervention on a wide variety of matters including the policing of demonstrations. The second model is core or quasi-judicial police independence in which police independence is restricted to the process of criminal investigation. The third model of democratic policing similarly restricts police independence but places greater emphasis on the responsible Minister’s responsibility and control over policy matters in policing. The fourth model of governmental policing both minimizes the ambit of police independence and accepts the greater role of central agencies in co-ordinating governmental services including policing.