DOCSLIB.ORG

US Military Forces in FY 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
US Military Forces in FY 2018 OCTOBER 2017 U.S. Military Forces in FY 2018 The Uncertain Buildup AUTHOR Mark F. Cancian A Report of the CSIS INTERNATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAM Blank OCTOBER 2017 U.S. Military Forces in FY 2018 The Uncertain Buildup AUTHOR Mark F. Cancian A Report of the CSIS DEFENSE OUTLOOK SERIES Lanham Boulder New York London About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. Today, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration. Thomas J. Pritzker was named chairman of the CSIS Board of Trustees in November 2015. Former U.S. deputy secretary of defense John J. Hamre has served as the Center’s president and chief executive officer since 2000. CSIS does not take specific policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed herein should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). © 2017 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-4422-8041-0 (pb); 978-1-4422-8042-7 (eBook) Center for Strategic & International Studies Rowman & Littlefield 1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW 4501 Forbes Boulevard Washington, DC 20036 Lanham, MD 20706 202-887-0200 | www.csis.org 301-459-3366 | www.rowman.com Contents Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................V Caveat ............................................................................................................................................................VI Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................VII Introduction .................................................................................................................................................1 Competing visions .................................................................................................................................1 A wide range of fiscal futures ..............................................................................................................10 Overview of Military Services ...................................................................................................................14 Army ...............................................................................................................................................................15 The future size of the Army .................................................................................................................. 17 Balance of regular and Guard/reserve forces ................................................................................. 18 Europe, Russia, and the European Reassurance Initiative (ERI) .................................................. 20 Modernization—the future force ....................................................................................................... 22 Navy .................................................................................................................................................... .......... 27 The size of the Navy ............................................................................................................................. 30 Navy shipbuilding—the future fleet ................................................................................................... 32 Naval aviation modernization—the future air arm ......................................................................... 38 Ship collisions and their implications for the force ....................................................................... 40 Marine Corps ...............................................................................................................................................42 Revised force structure ........................................................................................................................ 43 Aviation modernization and woes ..................................................................................................... 44 Ground modernization—the future force ........................................................................................ 46 Guam and Pacific force stationing .................................................................................................... 46 Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Forces (SP-MAGTFs) .................................................. 47 Amphibious ships and alternative platforms ................................................................................... 47 Air Force ....................................................................................................................................................... 49 Operational tempo—and the tension with warfare at the high end .......................................... 51 The A-10, legacy aircraft, and the purpose of airpower ............................................................... 52 Piloted versus unpiloted (or “manned versus unmanned“) .......................................................... 54 Aircraft modernization—the future force structure ....................................................................... 54 Nuclear enterprise ................................................................................................................................. 56 Space ........................................................................................................................................................ 57 Special Operations Forces (SOF) ............................................................................................................ 58 Size of the force ..................................................................................................................................... 58 Stress on the force ................................................................................................................................ 58 Dependence on OCO funding ........................................................................................................... 59 Management of Special Operations Forces .................................................................................... 59 DOD Civilians .............................................................................................................................................. 61 Reducing cost: pay raise and pension cuts ..................................................................................... 61 Reducing size: Hiring freezes and the size of the civilian workforce ........................................ 62 Reducing size: Cap on Senior Executive Service (SES) positions ............................................... 63 Increasing quality: reform and accountability ................................................................................ 63 Political appointees ............................................................................................................................... 64 Contractors .................................................................................................................................................65 Service contractors ............................................................................................................................... 65 | III Operational contractors ...................................................................................................................... 67 DOD-Wide ................................................................................................................................................... 70 Readiness and full-spectrum warfighting ........................................................................................ 70 National Security Reform and Reduction in Management Headquarters ................................ 73 Facilities and infrastructure ................................................................................................................. 74 Unmanned Systems and Artificial Intelligence ............................................................................... 75 DOD/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) split ...................................................... 76 U.S. allies .................................................................................................................................................. 78 About the Author ....................................................................................................................................... 81 IV | Mark F. Cancian Acknowledgments “Defense Outlook” is an annual series of studies on the linkages
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maritime Artist Corner
    DAILY COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS 2017 – 237 Number 237 *** COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS *** Thursday 24-08-2017 News reports received from readers and Internet News articles copied from various news sites. The OFFSHORE WENDUINE inbound for IJmuiden – Photo : Jan Plug (c) Your feedback is important to me so please drop me an email if you have any photos or articles that may be of interest to the maritime interested people at sea and ashore PLEASE SEND ALL PHOTOS / ARTICLES TO : [email protected] If you don't like to receive this bulletin anymore : To unsubscribe click here (English version) or visit the subscription page on our website. http://www.maasmondmaritime.com/uitschrijven.aspx?lan=en-US Distribution : daily to 37.450+ active addresses 24-08-2017 Page 1 DAILY COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS 2017 – 237 EVENTS, INCIDENTS & OPERATIONS The NAVE ATROPOS aproaching the IJmuiden locks assisted by the Port Towages Amsterdam Operated tug VENUS photo: Peter Maanders Port Towage Amsterdam © OOCL celebrated the christening of hull of OOCL Germany OOCL celebrated the christening of Hull H2173, a 21,413 TEU newbuilding constructed at the Samsung Heavy Industries shipyard on Geoje Island. Named as OOCL GERMANY, this mega containership is the second of the six 21 thousand TEU class vessels on order at the shipyard and they are an important part to enhancing the competitiveness and efficiency of OOCL modern fleet, the company announces in its press release. As with many of OOCL newbuildings, extra efforts have been made to ensure that they are operationally efficient and meeting the highest environmental standards.
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Program Guide 2012
    U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 FOREWORD The U.S. Navy is the world’s preeminent cal change continues in the Arab world. Nations like Iran maritime force. Our fleet operates forward every day, and North Korea continue to pursue nuclear capabilities, providing America offshore options to deter conflict and while rising powers are rapidly modernizing their militar- advance our national interests in an era of uncertainty. ies and investing in capabilities to deny freedom of action As it has for more than 200 years, our Navy remains ready on the sea, in the air and in cyberspace. To ensure we are for today’s challenges. Our fleet continues to deliver cred- prepared to meet our missions, I will continue to focus on ible capability for deterrence, sea control, and power pro- my three main priorities: 1) Remain ready to meet current jection to prevent and contain conflict and to fight and challenges, today; 2) Build a relevant and capable future win our nation’s wars. We protect the interconnected sys- force; and 3) Enable and support our Sailors, Navy Civil- tems of trade, information, and security that enable our ians, and their Families. Most importantly, we will ensure nation’s economic prosperity while ensuring operational we do not create a “hollow force” unable to do the mission access for the Joint force to the maritime domain and the due to shortfalls in maintenance, personnel, or training. littorals. These are fiscally challenging times. We will pursue these Our Navy is integral to combat, counter-terrorism, and priorities effectively and efficiently, innovating to maxi- crisis response.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Navy As a “Hollow Force” an Assessment of Naval Readiness from 2010 to 2017
    THE UNITED STATES NAVY AS A “HOLLOW FORCE” AN ASSESSMENT OF NAVAL READINESS FROM 2010 TO 2017 by Justin H. Witwicki A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Government Baltimore, Maryland December 2019 © 2019 Justin Witwicki All Rights Reserved Abstract From 2010 to 2017, at least six separate but interconnected factors damaged the military readiness of the United States Navy. This thesis explored the concepts of force readiness and force “hollowness” as qualitative measures of a military’s ability to execute its national security responsibilities. Through that lens, seven “force hollowing” indicators – which were defined in 1996 by the Center for Naval Analyses – were reconsidered in the context of the 2010-2017 Navy. Of those seven, five were accepted as applicable in modern context. Those five indicators were: pressure to cut defense spending, declining military pay, poor force morale, delays in fielding modern equipment, and inadequate maintenance of existing equipment. Thereafter, two additional readiness indicators – unsustainable operational tempo and the effects of global climate change – were added to those already existing in the academic literature. Both were deemed critical to a holistic understanding of naval readiness during the early- and mid-2010s. Unsustainable operational tempo was identified as a valid indicator of naval unreadiness from 2010 to 2017. An institutional culture which accepted a “normalization of deviance” facilitated a measurable rise in operational tempo and ultimately resulted in four at-sea mishaps that claimed 17 lives in the summer of 2017. In addition, climate change, although it was rejected as a chronic readiness challenge during the 2010s, was accepted as a clear threat to future readiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Dixie Mission II: the Legality of a Proposed U.S. Military Observer Group to Taiwan
    Dixie Mission II: The Legality of a Proposed U.S. Military Observer Group to Taiwan Michael C.M. Louis* I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 76 II. BACKGROUND OF U.S.-TAIWAN RELATIONS ...................................... 77 A. U.S.–Taiwan Defense Relations Post-World War II to 1979 ...... 77 B. United States – Taiwan Relations Since 1979 ............................ 80 III. ANALYSIS THAT SUPPORTS THE DIXIE MISSION II .............................. 89 A. Historical Precedent: The First Dixie Mission .......................... 89 B. Taiwan Relations Act and the Six Assurances ............................ 97 C. Taiwan Travel Act ..................................................................... 103 D. Recent U.S. Legislation Regarding Taiwan .............................. 106 E. Dixie Mission II’s Composition ................................................ 107 F. International Laws and Regulations as Persuasive Authority . 108 1. International Laws and Regulations Regarding Natural Disasters ............................................................................ 109 2. UN Convention on Law of the Sea ................................... 111 3. Convention on International Civil Aviation ...................... 115 4. Taiwan as an Emergency Stop for U.S. Warships and Aircraft in Distress ............................................................ 117 IV. THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA’S COUNTERARGUMENTS ........... 120 A. Historical Counterargument ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Readiness—Underlying Problems Associated with the Uss Fitzgerald and Uss John S
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 115–57] NAVY READINESS—UNDERLYING PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USS FITZGERALD AND USS JOHN S. McCAIN JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON READINESS MEETING JOINTLY WITH SUBCOMMITTEE ON SEAPOWER AND PROJECTION FORCES OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION HEARING HELD SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 27–560 WASHINGTON : 2018 SUBCOMMITTEE ON READINESS JOE WILSON, South Carolina, Chairman ROB BISHOP, Utah MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, Guam AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut STEVE RUSSELL, Oklahoma TULSI GABBARD, Hawaii MIKE ROGERS, Alabama CAROL SHEA-PORTER, New Hampshire VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri A. DONALD MCEACHIN, Virginia ELISE M. STEFANIK, New York SALUD O. CARBAJAL, California MARTHA MCSALLY, Arizona, Vice Chair ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee STEPHANIE N. MURPHY, Florida TRENT KELLY, Mississippi RO KHANNA, California MIKE GALLAGHER, Wisconsin MARGARET DEAN, Professional Staff Member BRIAN GARRETT, Professional Staff Member MIKE GANCIO, Clerk SUBCOMMITTEE ON SEAPOWER AND PROJECTION FORCES ROBERT J. WITTMAN, Virginia, Chairman K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri SUSAN A. DAVIS, California BRADLEY BYRNE, Alabama, Vice Chair JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, Guam MIKE GALLAGHER, Wisconsin JOHN GARAMENDI, California DUNCAN HUNTER, California DONALD NORCROSS, New Jersey PAUL COOK, California SETH MOULTON, Massachusetts JIM BRIDENSTINE, Oklahoma COLLEEN HANABUSA, Hawaii STEPHEN KNIGHT, California A. DONALD MCEACHIN, Virginia RALPH LEE ABRAHAM, Louisiana DAVID SIENICKI, Professional Staff Member PHIL MACNAUGHTON, Professional Staff Member DANIELLE STEITZ, Clerk (II) C O N T E N T S Page STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Bordallo, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Ships and Submarines of the United States Navy
    , AIRCRAFT CARRIER ENTERPRISE AIR SURVEILLANCE RADAR AMPHIBIOUS Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear-Propulsion) EXTENDING AN/SPY-6(V) Amphibious Assault Ship Gerald R. Ford Class CVN ACROSS THE FLEET America Class LHA USS Gerald R Ford CVN-78 USS America LHA-6 John F Kennedy CVN-79 Tripoli LHA-7 Enterprise CVN-80 Bougainville LHA-8 Nimitz Class CVN Wasp Class LHD USS Nimitz CVN-68 USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 USS Harry S Truman CVN-75 USS Wasp LHD-1 USS Bataan LHD-5 USS Dwight D Eisenhower CVN-69 USS George Washington CVN-73 USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 USS Essex LHD-2 USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 USS John C Stennis CVN-74 USS George HW Bush CVN-77 USS Kearsarge LHD-3 USS Iwo Jima LHD-7 USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 USS Boxer LHD-4 USS Makin Island LHD-8 SUBMARINE SURFACE COMBATANT Submarine (Nuclear-Powered) Amphibious Transport Dock Guided Missile Cruiser Los Angeles Class SSN San Antonio Class LPD USS Bremerton SSN-698 USS Helena SSN-725 USS Asheville SSN-758 USS Montpelier SSN-765 USS San Antonio LPD-17 USS Anchorage LPD-23 USS Somerset LPD-25 Ticonderoga Class CG USS Jacksonville SSN-699 USS Newport News SSN-750 USS Jefferson City SSN-759 USS Charlotte SSN-766 USS New Orleans LPD-18 USS Arlington LPD-24 USS John P Murtha LPD-26 USS Bunker Hill CG-52 USS Monterey CG-61 USS Cowpens CG-63 USS Chosin CG-65 USS Olympia SSN-717 USS San Juan SSN-751 USS Annapolis SSN-760 USS Hampton SSN-767 USS Mesa Verde LPD-19 USS Portland LPD-27 USS Mobile Bay CG-53 USS Chancellorsville CG-62 USS Gettysburg CG-64 USS Hue City CG-66
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Ships and Submarines of the United States Navy
    AIRCRAFT CARRIER AMPHIBIOUS Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear-Propulsion) Amphibious Assault Ship Gerald R. Ford Class CVN America Class LHA USS Gerald R Ford CVN-78 USS America LHA-6 John F Kennedy CVN-79 Tripoli LHA-7 Enterprise CVN-80 Bougainville LHA-8 Nimitz Class CVN INNOVATION Wasp Class LHD USS Nimitz CVN-68 USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 USS Harry S Truman CVN-75 USS Wasp LHD-1 USS Bataan LHD-5 USS Dwight D Eisenhower CVN-69 USS George Washington CVN-73 USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 USS Essex LHD-2 USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 USS John C Stennis CVN-74 USS George HW Bush CVN-77 ACROSS THE FLEET USS Kearsarge LHD-3 USS Iwo Jima LHD-7 USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 USS Boxer LHD-4 USS Makin Island LHD-8 SUBMARINE SURFACE COMBATANT Submarine (Nuclear-Powered) Amphibious Transport Dock Guided Missile Cruiser Los Angeles Class SSN San Antonio Class LPD USS Bremerton SSN-698 USS Helena SSN-725 USS Asheville SSN-758 USS Montpelier SSN-765 USS San Antonio LPD-17 USS Anchorage LPD-23 USS John P Murtha LPD-26 Ticonderoga Class CG USS Jacksonville SSN-699 USS Newport News SSN-750 USS Jefferson City SSN-759 USS Charlotte SSN-766 USS New Orleans LPD-18 USS Arlington LPD-24 Portland LPD-27 USS Bunker Hill CG-52 USS Monterey CG-61 USS Cowpens CG-63 USS Chosin CG-65 USS Olympia SSN-717 USS San Juan SSN-751 USS Annapolis SSN-760 USS Hampton SSN-767 USS Mesa Verde LPD-19 Fort Lauderdale LPD-28 USS Mobile Bay CG-53 USS Chancellorsville CG-62 USS Gettysburg CG-64 USS Hue City CG-66 USS Providence SSN-719 USS Pasadena SSN-752 USS
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Program Guide 2013
    U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2013 FOREWORD The U.S. Navy is the world’s most lethal, To implement the vision of my Sailing Directions and flexible, and capable maritime force. As the Defense Strategic Guidance, we will enhance endur- they have throughout our Nation’s history, every day our ing capabilities—such as our undersea dominance—and Sailors operate forward to provide American leaders with develop new ones to overcome threats to our freedom of timely options to deter aggression, assure allies, and re- action and to exploit adversary vulnerabilities. We will spond to crises with a minimal footprint ashore. field and integrate new unmanned air vehicles into our During 2012, the Navy remained the Nation’s front line in carrier air wings and accelerate procedures and systems conflict and in peace. The USS John C. Stennis deployed to make the electromagnetic spectrum and cyberspace twice to the Middle East in support of our troops in Af- a primary warfighting domain. We will enable sustained ghanistan, and the USS Bataan Amphibious Ready Group operations at key maritime crossroads around the world operated forward there for nearly 11 months. We honed through increased forward basing and by fielding new our coalition mine warfare skills in a 34-nation exercise in ships such as the Littoral Combat Ships, Joint High Speed the Arabian Gulf. We demonstrated our combined anti- Vessels, and Mobile Landing Platforms with rotating civil- submarine, missile defense, surface warfare, and humani- ian and military crews. We will ensure the proficiency and tarian assistance and disaster response capabilities with confidence of today’s Fleet with today’s systems and weap- 22 partner nations in the 2012 Rim of the Pacific exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Authorization for Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2018 and the Future Years Defense Program
    S. HRG. 115–448, PT. 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON S. 1519 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE MILITARY PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 2 SEAPOWER JUNE 6, 13, 21, 2017 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:44 Sep 04, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 C:\USERS\WR47328\DESKTOP\37503.TXT WILDA DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM—Part 2 SEAPOWER VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:44 Sep 04, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 C:\USERS\WR47328\DESKTOP\37503.TXT WILDA S. HRG. 115–448, PT. 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON S. 1519 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE MILITARY PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 2 SEAPOWER JUNE 6, 13, 21, 2017 Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov/ U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy News Week 9-3
    NAVY NEWS WEEK 9-3 27 February 2018 No Chinese warship movement detected near crisis-hit Maldives: Indian Navy According to sources, the Chinese naval movement, which was routine in nature, and through Sunda strait and to the north-west of Australia was approximately 2500 nautical miles away from Maldives. By: Express Web Desk | Updated: February 20, 2018 6:55 pm The latest development comes amid reports of Chinese naval movement in the Indian Ocean. (Source: AP) No Chinese warship movement has been detected near the crisis-ridden Maldives, Indian Navy sources have said amid reports of Chinese naval movement in the Indian Ocean. “We have a very robust surveillance system in Indian Ocean region, which is supported by mission-based deployment in place since July 2017,” a Navy spokesperson stated. According to sources, the Chinese naval movement was routine in nature and was through Sunda strait to the north-west of Australia. Sources said the Chinese naval movement took place approximately 2500 nautical miles away from the Maldives. Indian Navy has two detachments of Advanced Light Helicopters (SAR variant) while the Indian Coast Guard has a Dornier aircraft positioned in the Maldives. This means that more than three dozen Indian Navy personnel are present in the country at any given time, sources added. According to sources, the Chinese naval movement was routine in nature and was through Sunda strait to the north-west of Australia. Sources said the Chinese naval movement took place approximately 2500 nautical miles away from the Maldives Meanwhile, the Navy is also conducting the month-long Exercise Pashchim Lehar in the Arabian Sea which is witnessing participation of more than 40 ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy News Week 27-6
    NAVY NEWS WEEK 27-6 6 July 2018 Future USS Indiana submarine delivered to the Navy The newest nuclear-powered fast attack submarine, the future USS Indiana (SSN 789), has been delivered to the Navy. Newport News Shipbuilding officially delivered the submarine to the Navy Monday. It is the 16th Virginia-class submarine built as part of an agreement with General Dynamics Electric Boat. The Indiana is the eighth delivered by Newport News Construction started on the Indiana in September of 2012, with sea trials being completed earlier this year “For the nearly 4,000 shipbuilders who participated in construction of the boat, there is nothing more important than knowing that this vessel will support the Navy’s missions,” said Newport News Vice President of Submarine Construction Dave Bolcar in a statement. The Indiana is scheduled to be commissioned by the Navy during a ceremony at the Navy Port at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Port Canaveral, Florida in September. source : WTKR HMS Queen Elizabeth arrived back at Portsmouth on 23rd June followingfurther sea trials. She was assisted into Portsmouth Harbour by six Serco tugs with the SD Tempest on the bow, SD Indulgent and SD Independent on the stern and SD Bountiful, SD Christina and SD Suzanne escorting. Photo : Chris Brooks www.ShipFoto.co.uk © Philippine Navy ships join Pacific Rim exercise By : Michael Punongbayan MANILA, Philippines — Two of the Philippine Navy’s biggest ships joined the United States, Japanese, Indian and Singaporean navies yesterday in a formation exercise as the vessels sailed as a group to participate in this year’s Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise in Hawaii.
    [Show full text]