DOCSLIB.ORG

2035 Transpotation System Plan Existing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Washington County TSP 2035 • Existing Conditions and Future Needs Report **DRAFT 10/1/12** Chapter 5: Goods Movement and Aviation Washington County is often dubbed “the Economic Engine of Oregon.” Led by established industry clusters in high‐tech, clean tech and activewear, Washington County is home to over 232,000 jobs and the highest average weekly wages in Oregon.1 Critical to maintaining and raising this status is the efficient movement of goods by road, rail, and air. This chapter discusses existing conditions and future needs for roadway freight, freight rail, and air cargo. General aviation and pipelines are also covered. 5.1 ROADWAY FREIGHT CONNECTIONS This section deals primarily with the transport of freight on roadways because it is the only mode of freight travel over which Washington County has control. Although it is recognized that significant amounts of freight are also transported by rail and pipeline, and to a much lesser extent air, the planning for these modes is done by private companies or other government agencies. Rail, pipeline, and air modes are more specifically discussed as separate elements later in this chapter. Given the close connection between freight movement and economic growth, it is critically important for Washington County’s freight connections to provide efficient and reliable access for the transport of goods. To keep pace with regional trade volumes that are expected to double by 20352, the Washington County Transportation Plan must identify and address gaps and deficiencies in the freight network. The following section identifies key freight connections and summarizes existing freight needs. Also included are previous findings regarding freight system needs from the Metro Regional Transportation Plan, the Metro Regional Freight Plan, and the ODOT Portland Region Economic Corridor Evaluation Report. Freight is transported via intermodal, roadway, rail, air and marine facilities. Each of these modes provides an important element of goods movement in Washington County and the Portland Metro region. While all modes are important the majority of freight is moved via roadways, as approximately 67% of freight tonnage in the Portland Metropolitan area moved by truck in 20003. The following section identifies freight roadway designations and truck demand in Washington County. 5.1.1 Freight Route Destinations The Countywide Through‐truck route system is an important element of the plan. To provide for the most efficient transport of freight and to minimize impacts on residential neighborhoods, through‐truck routes are designated primarily on Arterial and Collector roads, However through‐truck route designations in this Plan encourage the use of these routes for through‐truck travel, but do not restrict through‐truck travel or local pickup and delivery by truck to these routes. The primary purpose of designating through‐truck routes in this plan is to ensure that any future improvements on these roads provide for the safe and efficient movement of trucks. 1 County Employment and Wages in Oregon – Fourth Quarter 2011, U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics, 2012. 2 Regional Freight Plan, Metro, June 2010, pg. 32 3 2035 Regional Transportation Plan, Metro, June 2010, pg. 1‐17 1 Chapter 5 • Goods Movement and Aviation **DRAFT 10/1/12** 2035 Transportation System Plan Through-Truck Æ ¤£26 Ä 47 Routes Ä Æ Æ Ä 47 Æ 6 Ä Existing Route 6 26 ¤£ Proposed Route Æ Ä Study Area* Æ Ä 47 8 ¤£26 Rural Washington County Æ 8 Ä Æ Ä 26 Æ Ä ¤£ Ä Æ Æ 8 8 Ä 219 Æ Ä Æ Ä 10 Æ 47 217Ä 210 * Additional through-truck route Æ 10 Ä 5 designations to be determined Æ Ä § ¨¦ by further study. Ä Æ Æ Ä 210 Æ Ä 99 219 210 ¨¦§5 Æ 219Ä ¨¦§205 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying Æ Ä purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the 99 primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. Care was taken in the mapping but there are no warranties for this product. However, notification of any errors will be ¯ appreciated. 1 inch represents 30,000 feet Department of Land Use and Transportation 0 15,000 30,000 Long Range Planning Division Feet J:\Workgroups\GISPlanning\TSP_2035\ExistingConditions\September2012\ThroughTruckRte_CoW.mxd Figure X October 01, 2012 Washington County TSP 2035 • Existing Conditions and Future Needs Report **DRAFT 10/1/12** Hazardous Materials The transport of hazardous materials is regulated by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration under Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 390‐397, and is not governed by local jurisdictions. Hazardous materials include a variety of substances, ranging from radioactive and medical wastes to gasoline. The transport of non‐ radioactive hazardous materials requires that vehicles transporting these materials comply with any routing designations of a state, be placarded or marked and not go through or near heavily populated areas, places where crowds are assembled, tunnels, narrow streets or alleys, except where there is no practicable alternative. The transport of radioactive materials is generally restricted to designated preferred routes on interstate highways, beltways or bypasses, where alternative routes have not been designated by a state. Transport of hazardous materials is permitted on all Through Truck Routes within the County, however the Vista Ridge tunnel (on US 26 near downtown Portland) is closed to such traffic. As a result, hazardous materials are frequently transported via Cornelius Pass Road. Regional Freight System Freight (i.e., truck) route designations are applied at the state, regional, county and local level. ODOT, Metro, Washington County as well as cities in Washington County each have their own designations that reflect the needs for transporting goods within and through the respective agency jurisdictions. Roadways on these routes should be designed, constructed, and maintained to support the efficient movement of freight. The 1999 Oregon Highway Plan identifies the State Highway Freight System. In Washington County, this designation is applied to all freeways (I‐5, US 26, and OR 217) as well as OR 99W and OR 6. At the regional level, Metro identifies a more‐detailed set of significant freight infrastructure. The Metro Regional Freight Network in Washington County is illustrated below. It identifies main roadways and road connectors for freight trucks, railroad lines, rail yards, marine facilities, and airports. The map also identifies major employment areas, industrial areas, and urban areas that are most likely to generate freight traffic. 3 Chapter 5 • Goods Movement and Aviation **DRAFT 10/1/12** 2035 Transportation System Plan Regional Æ ¤£26 Ä 47 Freight Network Ä Æ Æ Ä 47 Æ 6 Ä Main railroad lines 6 ¤£26 Branch railroad lines and spurs Ä Æ Æ Ä Main roadyway routes 47 8 ¤£26 Main roadway routes (proposed) Æ 8 Ä Road connectors Æ Ä 26 Æ Ä ¤£ Ä Æ Æ 8 8 Ä Road connectors (proposed) 219 Æ Ä Æ Ä 10 Æ 47 217Ä 210 Rail yards Æ 10 Ä 5 Marine facilities Æ Ä ¨¦§ Ä Æ Æ Ä 210 Æ Ä 99 219 Airports 210 ¨¦§5 Rural Washington County Æ 219Ä ¨¦§205 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying Æ Ä purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the 99 primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. Care was taken in the mapping but there are no warranties for this product. However, notification of any errors will be ¯ appreciated. 1 inch represents 30,000 feet Department of Land Use and Transportation 0 15,000 30,000 Long Range Planning Division Feet J:\Workgroups\GISPlanning\TSP_2035\ExistingConditions\September2012\MetroFreight_CoW.mxd Figure X October 01, 2012 Washington County TSP 2035 • Existing Conditions and Future Needs Report **DRAFT 10/1/12** 5.1.2 Truck Demand Truck Counts Counts of truck traffic have been taken at various locations within Washington County. These provide an understanding of truck operation within the county, but only at the points where the counts are taken. Specific path information about truck trips is extremely limited. For operational purposes, FHWA classifies vehicles into the following 13 categories: Figure 5‐3: FHWA Vehicle Classifications Source: FHWA Washington County vehicle classification counts, use this classification scheme, and describe trucks as class 4 through 13. 5 Chapter 5 • Goods Movement and Aviation **DRAFT 10/1/12** Washington County TSP 2035 • Existing Conditions and Future Needs Report **DRAFT 10/1/12** Vehicle Classification Counts have been taken at most Washington County count stations over the last 5 years. Count locations with Highest Truck Volumes: • Tualatin‐Sherwood Rd, W of Boones Ferry (5,948 trucks in 2007, and 4,085 trucks in 2012)4 • Cornelius Pass Rd, N of Cornell (2,172 trucks in 2007, 2,359 trucks in 2012) • Glencoe Rd, S of Beach (1,916 trucks in 2007, and 1,647 trucks in 2012) • Murray Blvd, S of Allen (1,882 trucks in 2007, and 1,657 trucks in 2012) • 185th Ave, N of Cornell (1,725 trucks in 2007, and 1,730 trucks in 2012) • Roy Rogers Rd, S of Scholls Ferry (1,723 trucks in 2007, and 1,587 trucks in 2012) • Scholls Ferry Rd, W of Nimbus (1,718 trucks in 2007, and 1,742 trucks in 2012) Count locations with Highest Truck Percentages: • Clark Hill Rd, S of Farmington (24% in 2007, and 14% in 2012) • Grahams Ferry Rd, S of Cahalin St (22% in 2007, and 20% in 2012) • Roy Rd, N of Cornelius‐Schefflin (22% in 2007, and 27% in 2012) • Cipole Rd, N of Tualatin‐Sherwood (19% in 2007, and 17% in 2012) • Tonquin Rd, S of Oregon St (18% in 2007, and 12% in 2012) • Sellers Rd, S of Hwy.
Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study

    Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study

    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
  • Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives

    Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives

    REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the national archives 1 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC Compiled by Peter F. Brauer 2010 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Records relating to railroads in the cartographic section of the National Archives / compiled by Peter F. Brauer.— Washington, DC : National Archives and Records Administration, 2010. p. ; cm.— (Reference information paper ; no 116) includes index. 1. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Cartographic and Architectural Branch — Catalogs. 2. Railroads — United States — Armed Forces — History —Sources. 3. United States — Maps — Bibliography — Catalogs. I. Brauer, Peter F. II. Title. Cover: A section of a topographic quadrangle map produced by the U.S. Geological Survey showing the Union Pacific Railroad’s Bailey Yard in North Platte, Nebraska, 1983. The Bailey Yard is the largest railroad classification yard in the world. Maps like this one are useful in identifying the locations and names of railroads throughout the United States from the late 19th into the 21st century. (Topographic Quadrangle Maps—1:24,000, NE-North Platte West, 1983, Record Group 57) table of contents Preface vii PART I INTRODUCTION ix Origins of Railroad Records ix Selection Criteria xii Using This Guide xiii Researching the Records xiii Guides to Records xiv Related
  • Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Report

    Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Report

    Report to the Washington State Legislature Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory December 2017 Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Errata The Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory published to WSDOT’s website on December 1, 2017 contained the following errata. The items below have been corrected in versions downloaded or printed after January 10, 2018. Section 4, page 62: Corrects the parties to the tolling agreement between the States—the Washington State Transportation Commission and the Oregon Transportation Commission. Miscellaneous sections and pages: Minor grammatical corrections. Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory | December 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary. .1 Section 1: Introduction. .29 Legislative Background to this Report Purpose and Structure of this Report Significant Characteristics of the Project Area Prior Work Summary Section 2: Long-Range Planning . .35 Introduction Bi-State Transportation Committee Portland/Vancouver I-5 Transportation and Trade Partnership Task Force The Transition from Long-Range Planning to Project Development Section 3: Context and Constraints . 41 Introduction Guiding Principles: Vision and Values Statement & Statement of Purpose and Need Built and Natural Environment Navigation and Aviation Protected Species and Resources Traffic Conditions and Travel Demand Safety of Bridge and Highway Facilities Freight Mobility Mobility for Transit, Pedestrian and Bicycle Travel Section 4: Funding and Finance. 55 Introduction Funding and Finance Plan Evolution During
  • Freight Modes

    Freight Modes

    Freight Modes Table of Contents Freight Modes .................................................................................................................................................. 423 Freight Transportation Overview .................................................................................................................424 Trucking .......................................................................................................................................................425 Freight Rail ...................................................................................................................................................427 Marine Freight ..............................................................................................................................................430 Air Cargo ......................................................................................................................................................432 Transportation Resource Manual Freight Modes • 423 Freight Transportation Overview Washington relies on an efficient multimodal freight transportation network, where shipped goods move into, out of, and around Washington by truck, rail, air, barge, and water. Washington had total imports and exports valued at $126.3 billion in 2017, down slightly (0.2%) from $126.6 billion in 2016. It was the fifth most trade-dependent state in the country in 2017, behind Louisiana, Michigan, Texas and Kentucky. In 2017, gross business income for freight-dependent industry
  • Freight Rail and the Oregon Economy a Background Paper

    Freight Rail and the Oregon Economy a Background Paper

    Freight Rail and the Oregon Economy A Background Paper final report prepared for Port of Portland prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March 2004 www.camsys.com final report Freight Rail and the Oregon Economy A Background Paper prepared for Port of Portland prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 100 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 400 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140 March 2004 Freight Rail and the Oregon Economy A Background Paper Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Freight Demand and the State of the Rail Industry .............................................. 2-1 3.0 Oregon’s Rail System................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Rail Network....................................................................................................... 3-1 4.0 Rail’s Role in the Oregon Economy ........................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Measures.............................................................................................................. 4-1 5.0 Rail Use by Industry Statewide ............................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Overview............................................................................................................. 5-1 6.0
  • WSK Commuter Rail Study

    WSK Commuter Rail Study

    Oregon Department of Transportation – Rail Division Oregon Rail Study Appendix I Wilsonville to Salem Commuter Rail Assessment Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Team Parsons Brinckerhoff Simpson Consulting Sorin Garber Consulting Group Tangent Services Wilbur Smith and Associates April 2010 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 3 WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? ................................................................................................... 3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS............................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA....................................................................................................................... 4 WES COMMUTER RAIL.......................................................................................................... 6 OTHER PASSENGER RAIL SERVICES IN THE CORRIDOR .................................................................. 6 OUTREACH WITH RAILROADS: PNWR AND BNSF .................................................................. 7 PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD........................................................................................... 7 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY ..................................................................................................... 7 ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS..................................................................................................
  • Leave the House Alone

    Leave the House Alone

    SUNRISE MONDAY EDmO JANUARY 7. 2008 Qkegonian t. ______~~c=~~~c=~ --------_:~~~~~~~ PORTLAND, OREGON 3REAKING NEWS AT OAEGONLlYLCOM WINNER Of THE 2007 fUUTZE~ PRIZE FOR BREAKING NEWS •• EDITORIALS TH.EOREGONIAN. MONOAY,JANUARY7,2008 THE OPINION OF THE OREGONIAN EDITORIAL BOARD Leave the house alone n the gritty southem edge of the transit cleared, as Tri-Met acquired various properties even after a 2004 environmental impact statement mall, where Interstate 405 dumps com­ and tore them down to make way for the tracks. concluded that the transit work would have mini~ muters into downtown, stands a lonely The Figo House is so isolated by construction work mal impact on his property. At the same time, the O vestige of old Portland, the Figo House now, it's hard even to reach Acker's office. State Historic Preservation Office agreed that the (named after the owner's dog.) It is channing to think that, when the work is house shouldn't be disturbed by the transit project It's a well·kept example of the Victorian archi­ done, the Figo House would again be accessible without some undefined measures, such as reloca­ tecture that has almost vanished from the central and situated by a busy light-rail station and the tion, to mitigate the changes. But TriMel says sub­ city. Unlike the last few remaining old houses state's largest university. But, of course, the transit sequent revisions to the light-rail route have put downtown, ~uch as the lovely but vacant halianale agency doesn't sec il that way. II wants 10 strip the the Figo House in tht' way.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000

    Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000

    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
  • I-405, SR 522 Vicinity to SR 527 Express Toll Lanes Improvement Project (MP 21.79 to 27.06)

    I-405, SR 522 Vicinity to SR 527 Express Toll Lanes Improvement Project (MP 21.79 to 27.06)

    JULY 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT I-405, SR 522 Vicinity to SR 527 Express Toll Lanes Improvement Project (MP 21.79 to 27.06) Mill Creek N 5 405 Canyon Park 527 Bothell Kenmore 522 522 Woodinville Kirkland 405 Lake Washington 520 520 Bellevue Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non-discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7090. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at [email protected] or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA (4232). Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. Notificación de Titulo VI al Público Es la política del Departamento de Transporte del Estado de Washington el asegurarse que ninguna persona, por razones de raza, color, nación de origen o sexo, como es provisto en el Título VI del Acto de Derechos Civiles de 1964, ser excluido de la participación en, ser negado los beneficios de, o ser discriminado de otra manera bajo cualquiera de sus programas y actividades financiado con fondos federales.
  • Lake Oswego Transportation System Plan

    Lake Oswego Transportation System Plan

    Plan Document Lake Oswego Transportation System Plan Lake Oswego, Oregon July 1997 Plan Document Lake Oswego Transportation System Plan Lake Oswego, Oregon Prepared for: City of Lake Oswego Prepared by: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 610 SW Alder Street, Suite 700 Portland, Oregon 97205 (503) 228-5230 July 1997 July 1997 Lake Oswego Transportation System Plan Table of Contents Table of Contents Section 1.0 Executive Summary 1-1 Section 2.0 Introduction 2-1 Section 3.0 Transportation System Plan 3-1 Section 4.0 Transportation Funding Plan 4-1 Section 5.0 Comprehensive Plan/Land Use Ordinance Modifications to Implement the Transportation System Plan 5-1 Section 6.0 Compatibility with State Transportation Planning Rule & Other Plans 6-1 Appendix A Project Potential Funding Sources Appendix 8 Modification to Lake Oswego Land Use and Development Code List of Figures Figure 3-1 Roadway Functional Classification Plan 3-7 Figure 3-2 Street Typical Cross Sections 3-8 Figure 3-3 Example of Crossover Easement and Conditional Access Policy/Process 3-12 Figure 3-4 Roadway Improvements Plan 3-15 Figure 3-5 Pedestrian Facilities Plan 3-18 Figure 3-6 Bicycle Facilities Plan 3-21 Figure 3-7 Transit Network and Facilities Plan 3-24 Figure 3-8 Truck Route, Rail, Water, and Pipeline Plan 3-30 List of Tables Table 3-1 Lake Oswego Street Functional Classification System Characteristics 3-5 Table 3-2 Proposed Access Spacing Guidelines 3-11 Table 3-3 Example of Recommended Land Use Process 3-13 Table 3-4 TDM Program Elements 3-27 Table 4-1 Individual Fund Summaries: Street Fund 4-2 Table 4-2 Summary of Proposed Transportation Improvement Program Cost (1997 $) .4-7 Table 4-3 Transportation Improvement Program .4-7 This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development.
  • Lake Oswego Portland

    Lake Oswego Portland

    Lake Oswego to Portland TRANSIT PROJECT Public scoping report August 2008 Metro People places. Open spaces. Clean air and clean water do not stop at city limits or county lines. Neither does the need for jobs, a thriving economy and good transportation choices for people and businesses in our region. Voters have asked Metro to help with the challenges that cross those lines and affect the 25 cities and three coun- ties in the Portland metropolitan area. A regional approach simply makes sense when it comes to protecting open space, caring for parks, planning for the best use of land, managing garbage disposal and increasing recycling. Metro oversees world-class facilities such as the Oregon Zoo, which contributes to conservation and educa- tion, and the Oregon Convention Center, which benefits the region’s economy Metro representatives Metro Council President – David Bragdon Metro Councilors – Rod Park, District 1; Carlotta Collette, District 2; Carl Hosticka, District 3; Kathryn Harrington, District 4; Rex Burkholder, District 5; Robert Liberty, District 6. Auditor – Suzanne Flynn www.oregonmetro.gov Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Project Public scoping report Table of contents SECTION 1: SCOPING REPORT INTRODUCTION …………………………………......... 1 Introduction Summary of outreach activities Summary of agency scoping comments Public comment period findings Conclusion SECTION 2: PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING ………………………………………………… 7 Summary Handouts SECTION 3: AGENCY SCOPING COMMENTS ………………………………………..... 31 Environmental Protection Agency SECTION 4: PUBLIC
  • Interstate 405 (Sepulveda Pass) Expresslanes Intermediate (Level II) Traffic & Revenue Study

    Interstate 405 (Sepulveda Pass) Expresslanes Intermediate (Level II) Traffic & Revenue Study

    Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority I-405 Level 2 Traffic & Revenue Study Interstate 405 (Sepulveda Pass) ExpressLanes Intermediate (Level II) Traffic & Revenue Study FINAL REPORT April 15, 2019 Interstate 405 (Sepulveda Pass) ExpressLanes Intermediate (Level II) Traffic & Revenue Study Contract No. AE275020011497 WSP Project No. 28078B Prepared for: Prepared by: In Partnership with: ECONorthwest System Metrics Group, Inc. AFSHA Consulting, Inc. Redhill Group, Inc. Document Control Version Date Initials Originator 11/3/2017 KT/SP/MW Checker 11/5/2017 DW Back Checker 11/16/2017 BB Verified By 11/17/2017 DW Revision Log Revision Date Description Submitted by 0 11/17/2017 Draft T&R Report submitted to Metro DW 1 01/19/2018 Revised T&R Report in response to comments KT/SP/MW/BB 2 01/23/2018 Draft Final T&R Report with Executive Summary DH/MW 3 01/24/2018 Draft Final T&R Report with Executive Summary to Document DW Editor 4 01/26/2018 Draft Final T&R Report with Executive Summary to Metro DW 5 03/16/2018 Final T&R Report DW 6 04/15/2019 Updated Executive Summary (Metro) AT/LT I-405 Level 2 Traffic & Revenue Study Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ ES-Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.1 Overview ........................................................................ES-Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.2 Methodology of T&R Study ...........................................ES-Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3 Stated Preference Survey ...............................................ES-Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3.1 Community Opinions ................................................................................... ES-3 1.3.2 Level of Service.............................................................................................. ES-5 1.3.3 Person Throughput ......................................................................................