BEFORE the PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION of the STATE of CALIFORNIA Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U-902-E)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BEFORE the PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION of the STATE of CALIFORNIA Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U-902-E) BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U-902-E) Requesting Approval and Funding for Application No. A.17-01-___ 2018-2022 Demand Response Portfolio in (Filed January 17, 2017) compliance with Decision 16-09-056. APPLICATION OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (U 902 E) REQUESTING APPROVAL AND FUNDING FOR 2018-2022 DEMAND RESPONSE PORTFOLIO E. Gregory Barnes Attorney for SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 8330 Century Park Court, CP32D San Diego, California 92123 Telephone: (858) 654-1583 Facsimile: (619) 699-5027 Email: [email protected] January 17, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 A. Summary of Funding Request ................................................................................ 1 B. Background and Guiding Principles for SDG&E’s Demand Response (DR) Portfolio .................................................................................................................. 2 C. Portfolio Cost Effectiveness Reflects that DR is in a Transition Period ................ 5 D. Supporting Testimony ............................................................................................. 8 II. STATUTORY AND PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS................................................ 8 A. Rule 2.1(a) – (c) ...................................................................................................... 8 1. Rule 2.1(a) – Legal Name ........................................................................... 8 2. Rule 2.1(b) – Correspondence .................................................................... 9 3. Rule 2.1(c) – Category, issues and schedule ............................................... 9 a. Proposed Category of Proceeding ................................................... 9 b. Need for Hearings ........................................................................... 9 c. Issues to be Considered ................................................................... 9 d. Proposed Schedule .......................................................................... 9 B. Rule 2.2 – Articles of Incorporation ..................................................................... 10 C. Rule 3.2 – Authority to Change Rates .................................................................. 10 1. Rule 3.2(a)(1) – Balance Sheet ................................................................. 10 2. Rule 3.2(a)(2) – Statement of Effective Rates .......................................... 10 3. Rule 3.2(a)(3) – Statement of Proposed Rate Change .............................. 10 4. Rule 3.2(a)(4) – Description of Property and Equipment ......................... 11 5. Rule 3.2(a)(5) and (6) – Summary of Earnings ........................................ 11 6. Rule 3.2(a)(7) – Statement Regarding Tax Depreciation ......................... 11 7. Rule 3.2(a)(8) – Proxy Statement ............................................................. 12 8. Rule 3.2(a)(10) – Statement re Pass Through to Customers ..................... 12 9. Rule 3.2(b) – Notice to State, Cities and Counties ................................... 12 10. Rule 3.2(c) – Newspaper Publication ....................................................... 12 11. Rule 3.2(d) – Bill Insert Notice ................................................................. 13 III. SERVICE .......................................................................................................................... 13 IV. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 13 VERIFICATION ATTACHMENT A - Financials, Balance Sheet, Income Statement Q3 2016 i ATTACHMENT B - Electric Tariff Table of Contents Effective January 1, 2017 ATTACHMENT C - Statement of Proposed Rate Increases ATTACHMENT D - Original Cost and Depreciation Q3 2016 ATTACHMENT E - Summary of Earnings Q3 2016 ATTACHMENT F - Service List - Notice to State, Cities, and Counties ii BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U-902-E) Requesting Approval and Application No. A.17-01-___ Funding for 2018-2022 Demand Response (Filed January 17, 2017) Portfolio in compliance with Decision 16-09- 056. APPLICATION OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (U 902 E) REQUESTING APPROVAL AND FUNDING FOR 2018-2022 DEMAND RESPONSE PORTFOLIO Pursuant to Article 2 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure and Decision (“D.”) 16-09-056,1 San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) submits this application requesting approval and funding for its 2018-2022 demand response portfolio. I. INTRODUCTION The basis for SDG&E’s application is described below, along with a description of the testimony supporting the application served contemporaneously herewith. This testimony provides the detail supporting SDG&E’s request for funding. A. Summary of Funding Request SDG&E’s total funding request in this application for the period 2018-2022 is $97.9 million, as summarized in the following table: 1 Decision Adopting Guidance for Future Demand Response Portfolios and Modifying Decision 14-12- 024 (October 5, 2016), at 97, ordering paragraph 6, requires: No later than January 16, 2017, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, and Southern California Edison Company [collectively referred to herein as the “IOUs”] shall each file an application requesting approval and funding for 2018 demand response portfolios for existing models of demand response programs and activities pursuant to the guidance provided in this decision. Id., at 98, ordering paragraph 9, provides that such applications shall be for program years 2018-2022. D.16-12-032 (December 5, 2016) corrects errors in D.16-09-056 but does not affect the citations in this application. [Greg – not sure if you want to include this statement, so feel free to delete.] Total Budget Request 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 TOTAL $ Millions $22.2 $19.1 $18.7 $19.0 $19.0 $97.9 These numbers include requests of $3,259,000 for Electric Rule 32 direct market participation support, and $4,778,000 for the Demand Response Auction Mechanism (DRAM) budget. Both the Electric Rule 32 and DRAM requests are outside the demand response portfolio, and therefore, SDG&E does not include these two cost categories in the DR portfolio. The prepared direct testimony of B. Elaine MacDonald2 details the proposed budgets for 2018 through 2022 demand response portfolio under the authorized funding categories, plus program cost recovery, fund-shifts and reporting. B. Background and Guiding Principles for SDG&E’s Demand Response (DR) Portfolio This application proposes to enable SDG&E to continue to provide its customers with innovative DR programs that offer customers options that fit their homes and businesses. At the end of 2016, SDG&E counted over 28,000 thermostats installed through its technology program, giving customers even more control over their energy usage. As a provider of both Energy Efficiency and DR programs, along with a host of other customer touch points, SDG&E has a great opportunity to encourage customers to achieve a clean energy future. SDG&E is eager to leverage this position to provide offerings that help achieve the state’s climate goals. SDG&E’s proposals for the 2018-2022 Demand Response portfolio represent a culmination of recent Commission directives aimed at transitioning DR to an integrated CAISO3 2 Chapter 6 of the testimony supporting this application and served contemporaneously herewith. See, id., especially Tables EMD A-1 through A-3 at pp. EMD-1-4. 3 California Independent System Operator Corporation. 2 resource, increasing third-party participation, and improving programs through technology neutrality. Most importantly, 2018 represents the first year of full bifurcation of the utility’s programs. All SDG&E programs are clearly identified as either (1) supply side (SS) resources, and bid into the CAISO markets by the utility; or (2) Load Modifying DR (LMDR) which helps the utility shift or reduce loads at critical or peak times thereby reducing the load forecast or supporting local sub-lap needs. Further, SDG&E’s broad program portfolio supports the Commission’s objective of streamlining and consolidating DR in the DR portfolio,4 as well as maintaining the utility’s role as a strong and viable supplier of both supply side and load modifying DR. D.15-02-007 adopted the Joint Party proposal which established working groups and the performance of a demand response potential study.5 D.14-12-024 required full implementation of the bifurcation of demand response programs by 2018 (and hence, full integration of supply side resources into the CAISO market), with 2016 and 2017 denoted as transition years.6 D.16- 09-056 described D.15-02-007 as where: … the Commission solidified its commitment to the integration of demand response into the CAISO market by first concluding that event-based load modifying resources have no measureable capacity value and thus requiring that only demand response programs integrated into the CAISO energy market or embedded in the California Energy Commission’s unmanaged/base case load forecast will receive capacity value.7 4 R.13-09-011, Joint Assigned Commissioner and Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Providing Guidance for 2017 Demand Response Programs and Activities Proposal Filings (September 15, 2015) at 13.
Recommended publications
  • Strong Office Investment Sale Activity
    Research & Forecast Report SAN FRANCISCO | OFFICE MARKET Q2 | 2019 > VACANCY Overall vacancy rate grew during the second quarter by a Strong Office percentage point to 7.0 percent. This increase in vacancy is primarily attributed to new construction being delivered to the market as well as some tenants moving out of spaces that have already been leased. There are a number of Investment Sale Activity large occupancies expected during the second half of 2019 such as Facebook, Google, Dropbox, Twilio and Slack to name a few that will drive the vacancy rate Sony PlayStation down in San Francisco. secured 130,000 square feet at 303 > LEASING VOLUME The City experienced another strong quarter of 2nd Street leasing activity, which reflected approximately 2.3 million square feet of closed transactions. Demand remains very strong in the market with technology REDCO Development purchased 1 Montgomery companies leading the demand for space which translates in for 42 percent Street for $82 million, of the requirements. The second largest demand comes from coworking ($1,081 psf) companies which account for 12.4 percent of the requirements. Demand for space in the market shows no signs of declining. Four deals closed over 100,000 square feet this quarter and two of these deals were companies locking in expansion space. First Republic Bank leased 265,000 square feet at One Front Street, Sony PlayStation secured 130,000 square feet at 303 2nd Street COLUMBUS Segment.io renewed for over 88,000 and Autodesk leased nearly 118,000 square feet at 50 Beale Street. Year-to-date square feet at 100 ten leases over 100,000 square feet have been signed in San Francisco.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Public Utilities Commission of The
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FILED 01/25/21 Order Instituting Rulemaking to Create a 04:59 PM Consistent Regulatory Framework for the Rulemaking 14-10-003 Guidance, Planning and Evaluation of Integrated (Filed October 2, 2014) Distributed Energy Resources. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of OPENING COMMENTS OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (U 902-E) ON THE PROPOSED DECISION ADOPTING TWO TARIFF PILOTS FOR PROCURING DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES THAT AVOID OR DEFER UTILITY CAPITAL INVESTMENTS has been electronically mailed to each party of record of the service list in R.14-10-003. Due to the current Coronavirus (COVID-19) health crisis, our legal staff is working from home. Accordingly, the normal mailing of hard copies is not possible and hard copies will not be mailed to the Administrative Law Judge or to parties who are on the service list and have not provided an electronic mail address. Executed January 25, 2021 at San Diego, California. /s/ Tamara Grabowski Tamara Grabowski 1 / 15 CPUC - Service Lists - R1410003 CPUC Home CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists PROCEEDING: R1410003 - CPUC - OIR TO CREATE FILER: CPUC LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: JANUARY 5, 2021 Download the Comma-delimited File About Comma-delimited Files Back to Service Lists Index Parties CARMELITA L. MILLER DAMON FRANZ LEGAL COUNSEL DIR - POLICY & ELECTRICITY MARKETS THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE TESLA, INC. EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE FOR: TESLA, INC. (FORMERLY SOLARCITY CORPORATION) EVELYN KAHL MARC D JOSEPH GENERAL COUNSEL, CALCCA ATTORNEY CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY CHOICE ASSOCIATION ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO, PC EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS FOR: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY COALITION EMPLOYEES MERRIAN BORGESON DENISE GRAB SR.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of PacifiCorp (U 901 E) for Approval of its Application ____________ 2017 Transportation Electrification Programs CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Rosa Gutierrez, certify that I have on this 30th day of June 2017 caused a copy of the foregoing APPLICATION OF PACIFICORP (U 901 E) FOR APPROVAL OF ITS 2017 TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAMS to be served on all known parties to R.13-11-007 listed on the most recently updated service list available on the California Public Utilities Commission website, via email to those listed with email and via U.S. mail to those without email service. I also caused copies to be hand- delivered as follows: Commissioner Carla Peterman ALJ John S. Wong California Public Utilities Commission California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 San Francisco, CA 94102 Amy Mesrobian Energy Division California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 30th day of June 2017 at San Francisco, California. /s/ Rosa Gutierrez Rosa Gutierrez 3219/003/X192215.v1 CPUC - Service Lists - R1311007 Page 1 of 17 CPUC Home CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists PROCEEDING: R1311007 - CPUC - OIR TO CONSID FILER: CPUC LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: JUNE 27, 2017 Download the Comma-delimited File About Comma-delimited Files Back to Service Lists Index Parties CAMERON SEAN GRAY JEREMY WAEN ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGER SR. REGULATORY ANALYST COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL MARIN CLEAN ENERGY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL FOR: MARIN CLEAN ENERGY JOHN BOESEL JOHN W.
    [Show full text]
  • Bart at Twenty: Land Use and Development Impacts
    ffional Development BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with research assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich July 1995 University of California at Berkeley - 1 BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with Research Assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich This paper was produced with support provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) through the University of California Transportation Center. University of California at Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development Table of Contents ONE: BART at 20: An Analysis of Land Use Impacts 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1 TWO: Research Approach and Data Sources 3 THREE: Employment and Population Changes in BART and Non-BART Areas 6 3.1. Population Changes 6 3.2. Employment Changes 3.3. Population Densities 15 3.4. Employment Densities 15 3.5. Summary 20 FOUR: Land Use Changes Over Time and by Corridor 21 4.1. General Land-Use Trends 23 4.2. Pre-BART versus Post-BART 25 4.3. Early versus Later BART 30 4.4. Trends in Non-Residential Densities 33 4.4. Summary 37 FIVE: Land-Use Changes by Station Classes 38 5.1. Grouping Variables 38 5.2. Classification 38 5.3. Station Classes 41 5.4. Trends in Residential and Non-Residential Growth Among Station Classes 44 5.5. Percent Growth in Early- versus Later-BART Years Among Station Classes 46 5.6. Trends in Non-Residential Densities Among Station Classes 46 SLX: Matched-Pair Comparisons of Land-Use Changes near BART Stations Versus Freeway Interchanges 51 6.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Calcca and DACC Comments on Draft Resolution E-5131
    March 30, 2021 CPUC Energy Division Attn: Tariff Unit and Edward Randolph, Director 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 By email: [email protected] Re: California Community Choice Association and Direct Access Customer Coalition Comments on Draft Resolution E-5131, Concerning Joint IOU Advice Letters in response to Decision 20-03-019 (PCIA Bill Presentation) Dear Tariff Unit and Mr. Randolph: Pursuant to General Order 96-B, and the Comment Letter dated March 10, 2021, California Community Choice Association1 (CalCCA) and the Direct Access Customer Coalition2 (DACC) (Joint Parties) submit these comments on draft resolution E-5131 (Draft Resolution). The Draft Resolution approves with modifications Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s Advice Letter 4302-G/5932-E, Southern California Edison Company’s Advice Letter 4280-E, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company’s Advice Letter 3600-E (Advice Letters). 1. Summary of CalCCA Position Joint Parties support implementing the proposed changes in the Advice Letters, as modified in the Draft Resolution, as soon as possible. Joint Parties disagree with Finding 5 that “Further changes to bundled customer bills are 1 California Community Choice Association was formed in 2016 as a trade organization to facilitate joint participation in certain regulatory and legislative matters in which members share common interests. CalCCA’s voting membership includes community choice aggregators (CCAs) serving load and others in the process of implementing new service, including: Apple Valley Choice Energy,
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Consider Alternative-Fueled Vehicle Programs, Tariffs, and Rulemaking 13-11-007 Policies. (Filed November 14, 2013) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (U902E) NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE-GRID INTEGRATION PILOT PROGRAM (“POWER YOUR DRIVE”) SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT has been electronically mailed to each party of record on the service list in R.13-11-007. SDG&E is unable to serve the report to A.14- 04-014 because that service list has been closed. Any party on the service list who has not provided an electronic mail address was served by placing a copy in a properly addressed and sealed envelope and depositing such envelope in the United States Mail with first-class postage prepaid. A copy was also sent via Federal Express to the Assigned Administrative Law Judge in this proceeding. Executed this 6th day of September 2016 at San Diego, California /s/ Tamara Grabowski Tamara Grabowski CPUC - Service Lists - R1311007 Page 1 of 15 CPUC Home CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists PROCEEDING: R1311007 - CPUC - OIR TO CONSID FILER: CPUC LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: AUGUST 19, 2016 Download the Comma-delimited File About Comma-delimited Files Back to Service Lists Index Parties CAMERON SEAN GRAY JEREMY WAEN ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGER SR. REGULATORY ANALYST COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL MARIN CLEAN ENERGY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL FOR: MARIN CLEAN ENERGY JOHN BOESEL JOHN W.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Office Market
    RESEARCH 2Q 2020 SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE MARKET DROP IN ABSORPTION CURRENT CONDITIONS San Francisco experienced the largest drop in absorption in nearly two decades, at negative 3.1 million square feet. While 1/3 of that is Overall vacancy increased by 360 basis points to 7.6%, and Class A attributed to the delivery of the Uber campus at Mission Bay, which is vacancy increased 430 basis points to 7.4%. not yet occupied, the remaining 2.1 million square feet of negative Availability increased by more than 1.5 million square feet for the absorption is the greatest single-quarter drop since the beginning of third quarter in a row, increasing from 9.5 million square feet last 2001. As a result, vacancy jumped 360 basis points to 7.6% and quarter to 12.1 million square feet. availability increased 290 basis points to 14.2%. Nearly 65% of the Class A direct average asking rates fell slightly to $90.31/SF, and increase in availability in the second quarter came from sublease overall direct asking rates decreased to $84.39/SF. space, which grew by 1.7 million square feet, or 46.9%. At 5,214,633 square feet, sublease availability has more than tripled over the last year and is expected to increase further. MARKET ANALYSIS Asking Rent and Vacancy The increase in available space came with only a small decrease in overall asking rents, which ended the quarter at $84.39/SF, a drop of $100 10.0% 2.4% since last quarter and just 0.6% less than year ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Sales Activity on the Rise
    Research & Forecast Report SAN FRANCISCO | OFFICE MARKET Q2 | 2018 Investment Sales Activity > VACANCY The overall vacancy rate shed 40 basis points to 6.1 percent and continues to reflect historic lows for San Francisco. In the City Class A assets continue to drive market absorption with over 2.8 million square feet year-to- on the Rise date. This has translated into the Class A vacancy rate dropping 40 basis points to 6.0 percent. Vacant sublease space remained flat during the past three months at 0.8 percent. The key driver for the vacancy shrinking during the first half of Cruise Automation snaps this year was the South Financial District which has posted 2.3 million square up the Dropbox sublease feet of net absorption which saw its vacancy rate drop 270 basis points since the Northwood Investors space at 333 & 345 beginning of the year to 4.6 percent. purchased 123 Mission Brannan Street as well as Street for $290 million 301 Brannan Street ($839 psf) > LEASING VOLUME San Francisco experienced a surge of leasing activity during the second quarter of the year which translated into nearly 2.8 million square feet of transactions closing. Technology companies continue to gobble up space in the City and their appetite for space doesn’t seem to be quenched. Four deals closed over 100,000 square feet this quarter and all these deals were companies securing expansion space. The market experienced the largest lease Facebook secures the largest lease in ever signed in San Francisco when Facebook leased all 773,000 square feet at the City’s history, 250 Howard Street (Park Tower).
    [Show full text]
  • Licensed Store Store Name and Location State
    ALASKA LICENSED STORE STORE NAME AND LOCATION STATE AAFES 70386 - AAFES @ FORT WAINWRIGHT AK AAFES 75323 - AAFES @ ELMENDORF AFB AK AAFES 75471 - AAFES @ FT RICHARDSON FRONTIER AK BARANOF WESTMARK HOTEL 22704 BARANOF WESTMARK HOTEL AK FRED MEYER 72709 - FRED MEYER 485 @ FAIRBANKS AK FRED MEYER 72727 - FRED MEYER 656 @ ABBOTT AK FRED MEYER 72772 - FRED MEYER 668 @ EAGLE RIVER AK FRED MEYER 72773 - FRED MEYER 653 @ WASILLA AK FRED MEYER 72784 - FRED MEYER 71 @ DIMOND AK FRED MEYER 72788 - FRED MEYER 11 @ NORTHERN LIGHT AK FRED MEYER 72946 - FRED MEYER 17 @ SOLDOTNA AK FRED MEYER 72975 - FRED MEYER 224 @ FAIRBANKS AK FRED MEYER 72980 - FRED MEYER 671 @ PALMER AK FRED MEYER 79324 - FRED MEYER 158 @ JUNEAU AK FRED MEYER Fred Meyer-Anchorage East #18 AK HMS HOST 75697 - HMS HOST @ ANC 75697 AK HMS HOST 75988 - HMS HOST @ ANC 75988 AK SAFEWAY 12449 - SAFEWAY 1813 @ ANCHORAGE AK SAFEWAY 15313 - SAFEWAY 1739 @ PALMER AK SAFEWAY 3513 - SAFEWAY 1809 @ ANCHORAGE DEBARR RD AK SAFEWAY 4146 - SAFEWAY 1811 @ WAILLA AK SAFEWAY 74265 - SAFEWAY 1807 @ ALASKA EAGLE AK SAFEWAY 74266 - SAFEWAY 1817 @ MULDOON AK SAFEWAY 74283 - SAFEWAY 1820 JUNEAU AK SAFEWAY 74352 - SAFEWAY 2628 @ ABBOTT LOOP AK SAFEWAY 74430 - SAFEWAY 1805 @ AURORA AK SAFEWAY 74452 - SAFEWAY 3410 @ FAIRBANKS AK SAFEWAY 74474 - SAFEWAY 1090 @ KODIAK AK SAFEWAY 74640 - SAFEWAY 1818 @ KETCHIKAN AK SAFEWAY 74695 - SAFEWAY 548 @ SOLDOTNA AK SAFEWAY 74706 - SAFEWAY 2728 @ SEWARD AK SAFEWAY 74917 - SAFEWAY 1832 @ HOMER AK SAFEWAY 79549 - SAFEWAY 520 @ ANCHORAGE AK SAFEWAY 79664 - SAFEWAY 1812 @ ANCHORAGE
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION of the STATE of CALIFORNIA CERTIFICATE of SERVICE Application of Pacific Gas and Electric
    FILED 01/08/18 04:59 PM BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Approval of the Retirement of Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Implementation of the Joint Proposal, And Recovery of Associated Costs Through Application 16-08-006 Proposed Ratemaking Mechanisms (Filed August 11, 2016 ) (U39E). CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have on this date caused the attached “MOTION TO LATE-FILE SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION” to be served pursuant to the CPUC’s Rules of Practice and Procedure upon the official service list for A16-08-006, obtained from the CPUC’s website and attached hereto, by electronic mail (e-mail) to all persons with a valid e- mail address on the official service list and by U.S. Mail to all parties without a valid e- mail address on the official service list. I have also sent a hard copy of the attachments by U.S. Mail to the Assigned Administrative Law Judge, Peter V. Allen, and Commissioner Michael Picker in this proceeding. Administrative Law Judge Peter V. Allen - Via U.S. Mail Certified Mail RRR 7016 2140 0000 0369 2531 Commissioner Michael Picker - Via U.S. Mail Certified Mail RRR 7016 2140 0000 0369 2548 California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3214 1 1 / 19 (In addition, I have served the related parties below. This information is included as a matter of record.) Rita Neal Office of County Counsel County of San Luis Obispo 1055 Monterey St, Room D-320 San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 (805) 781-5400 Voice (805) 781-4221 Fax [email protected] email Via Email and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION of the STATE of CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Develop and Adopt Fire-Threat
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FILED OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1-10-17 04:59 PM Order Instituting Rulemaking to Develop and Adopt Fire-Threat Maps and Fire-Safety R.15-05-006 Regulations. (Filed May 7, 2015) PROOF OF SERVICE THE CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH REPLY COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION ADOPTING A WORK PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF FIRE MAP 2 David L. Huard Lilly B. McKenna Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP One Embarcadero Center, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 291-7400 Fax: (415) 291-7474 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for City of Laguna Beach January 10, 2017 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Breya Nivera, declare as follows: I am employed in San Francisco County, San Francisco, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to this action. My business address is MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP, One Embarcadero Center, 30th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111. On January 10, 2017 I served the within: THE CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH REPLY COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION ADOPTING A WORK PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF FIRE MAP 2 on the interested parties in this action addressed as follows: SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST (BY PUC E-MAIL SERVICE) By transmitting such document electronically from Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, San Francisco, California, to the electronic mail addresses listed below. I am readily familiar with the practice of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP for transmitting documents by electronic mail, said practice being that in the ordinary course of business, such electronic mail is transmitted immediately after such document has been tendered for filing.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA Commercial Real Estate 2019 Forecast Agenda
    SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA Commercial Real Estate 2019 Forecast Agenda US & Bay Area Economic Trends Tech Sector Job Growth Population Growth Office Market Trends Multifamily Market Trends Conclusions / Forecast Economic Trends & Outlook US Real GDP: Percent Change from preceding quarter 8% 6% 4.2% 4% 3.4% 2.4% 2% 0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 -2% -4% -6% -8% -10% Sources: Moody's Analytics; CoStar Market Analytics Corporate Profits: After Tax $Billions $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 National Job Growth is Steady Employment Growth (Y/Y) 6% 4% 2% 0% (2%) (4%) (6%) (8%) 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Source: Moody's Analytics Job Growth Has Already Slowed in San Francisco San Francisco United States Employment Growth (Y/Y) 6% 4% 2% 0% (2%) (4%) (6%) (8%) 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Source: Moody's Analytics * Year-to-Date 2019 Forecast: Slower Growth San Francisco United States Employment Growth (Y/Y) 6% Forecast 4% 2% 0% (2%) (4%) (6%) (8%) 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Source: Moody's Analytics * Year-to-Date Job Growth Forecast San Francisco East Bay San Jose 6% Forecast 4% 2% 0% (2%) (4%) (6%) (8%) (10%) 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Total Nonfarm Employment Growth Percentage, Year-Over-Year Sources: Moody's Analytics; CoStar Market Analytics Unemployment Rates San Francisco East Bay San Jose 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
    [Show full text]