DOCSLIB.ORG

North Macedonia External Relations Briefing: 2020 Parliamentary Elections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Macedonia External Relations Briefing: 2020 Parliamentary Elections ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 31, No. 4 (MK) July 2020 North Macedonia external relations briefing: 2020 Parliamentary Elections: External Relations in the Electoral Programmes of Parliamentary Political Parties Adela Gjorgjioska 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: CHen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 2020 Parliamentary Elections: External Relations in the Electoral Programmes of Parliamentary Political Parties Following the Parliamentary Elections held on July 15th, six political parties secured at least 1 MP seat in the Macedonian Parliament. The representation in the legislature for the period 2020-2024 will be distributed as follows: The SDSM-led coalition - 46 MPs; VMRO- DPMNE-led coalition - 44 MPs; Democratic Union for Integration (DUI) - 15 MPs. The coalition ASA (between the Alliance for Albanians and Alternative) - 12 MPs. Levica “The Left” - 2 MPs and the Democratic Party of Albanians - 1 MP. This report takes a look at the electoral programmes of each of these parties, focusing specifically on their proposed strategies with regards to foreign policy. SDSM-led coalition In May 2017, when the SDSM-DUI coalition government was formed one of its key pledges was EU and NATO integration. As part of this approach, two bilateral Agreements were signed with two neighbouring countries: the Prespa Agreement with Greece signed in June 2018 and the Friendship Treaty with Bulgaria in August 2017. The first entailed the country’s name change into North Macedonia and paved the way towards the country’s NATO membership in March 2020. The second aimed at achieving a similar effect by neutralising a possible Bulgarian veto on the Macedonian EU accession pathway. The SDSM strategy has divided society between on the one hand those who have criticised it as an act of national betrayal, and on the other hand those who have supported it by focusing on the benefits of NATO membership and (the prospect of) EU membership. The political campaign ahead of the 2020 elections continued to follow the Euro-Atlantic path. In the preface of the political programme of the SDSM, the leader of the SDSM Zoran Zaev declared: “Today, North Macedonia is the 30th member-state of NATO, and we are also starting the accession negotiations with the EU. We have entered into NATO, we can also enter the EU. 1 That means a certain future for all of us, and for our children, and a guaranteed economic development, because we are gaining access to new european markets”.1 NATO membership is also described as “an entry ticket to the EU”. It is stated that the key goal of the next SDSM-led government would be to start EU accession negotiations aimed at “Europeanising the country”. The party pledges to open 80% of the negotiation chapters with the EU by 2024. Furthermore, it pledges to secure 2,5 billion euros from EU funds for “dealing with Covid 19, building a new economy, the green agenda, energy, competitiveness, capital investments, agriculture and infrastructure”.2 VMRO-DPMNE-led coalition VMRO-DPMNE’s foreign policy strategy is not very dissimilar to that of the SDSM-led coalition. It states that “the VMRO-DPMNE considers membership of Macedonia in the EU and NATO to be necessary for completing the Macedonian statehood”.3 Thus the focus of a VMRO-led government would be on: achieving full-fledged EU membership; continuous fulfilment of the obligations arising from the NATO membership; better utilization of EU funds; strengthening the institutional capacities for EU membership. The programme aims to balance between the expectations of the VMRO electorate (which opposes the Prespa Agreement) on the one hand and the party’s close relations with influential NATO and EU states on the other. In the programme, the new name “North Macedonia” is not used and there is (only implicit) criticism of the Prespa Agreement: “under the veil of unrealistic promises, the citizens of Macedonia have faced the biggest national humiliation”. VMRO doesn’t propose any measures to annul the Agreement, instead caling for the establishment of an academic institute which would examine the implications of the Prespa Agreement with Greece and the Friendship Agreement with Bulgaria, in order to “neutralise their negative aspects”. VMRO-DPMNE also states that it would aim to “send a clear message that in the 21st century, diplomacy should not be used as an instrument which exploits the wishes of the Macedonian people for a European future in order to advance nationalist agendas policies from the 19th century”. This is a nod to Bulgaria, which as an EU member state, has an asymmetrical bargaining position vis a vis the non-member state (N.Macedonia), allowing it to impose conditions on the latter in exchange for an open pathway to EU membership. 1 https://mojotizbor.mk/images/programi2020/Programa-2020_Mozeme.pdf 2 https://mojotizbor.mk/images/programi2020/Programa-2020_Mozeme.pdf 3 https://mojotizbor.mk/images/programi2020/programa2020vmro.pdf 2 Democratic Union For Integration (DUI) DUI’s electoral programme outlines the following as its key achievements as part of the SDSM-led Government between 2017-2020: “Solution to the name issue; Agreements on good neighbourly relations with Bulgaria and Greece; NATO membership; opening of accession negotiations with the EU; EU visa liberalisation; free movements without passports in Albania and Kosovo; reduction in the cost of “roaming services”. Istates that its key goals in the next period will be the fulfilment of all of the responsibilities that arise from NATO membership, as well as achieving full-fledged EU membership by 2025. The coalition ASA (between the Alliance for Albanians and Alternative) The coalition ASA advocates an active role in NATO, as well as close neighbourly relations with regional member states of NATO. Describing itself as pro-EU, it calls for the improvement of the institutional capacities necessary for the EU accession negotiations, the harmonization of the domestic and the EU legislature and the utilization of EU funds. Furthermore, it proposes the development of a strategic partnership between Macedonia and both Kosovo and Albania. Supporting Kosovo on the international and the regional diplomatic arena is described as its central strategic objective: “we will work on strengthening Kosovo’s position as a sovereign and equal state in all the regional processes in which N.Macedonia participates”.4 Finally, it calls for the increase of ethnic-Albanian personnel across the macedonian diplomatic network, and for the provision of official communication in Albanian on all levels across the diplomatic network and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Levica “The Left” Levica’s foreign relations programme is radically different from all the other parliamentary parties. It is the only parliamentary political party which calls for the annulment of the Prespa Agreement5 due to the “criminal and illegal way in which it was forced on the country” but also due to its contravening of the principle of self-determination. It also calls for the withdrawal of the country’s membership in the NATO Alliance, arguing that according to the Macedonian constitution membership in military alliances is conditional on the successful 4 https://mojotizbor.mk/images/programi2020/Alijansa%20za%20Albancite%20i%20alternativa.pdf 5 The Prespa Agreement was was ratified internally in spite of a failed referendum. The referendum on the name change posed the question “Are you in favour of EU and NATO membership by accepting the Agreement between the Republic of Macedonia and the Republic of Greece?” Following the successful campaign of the informal movement #Бојкотирам (I’m Boycotting), with only 36,89% turn out, the Referendum failed. Following the failed Referendum, the two third majority in parliament required to pass 4 Constitutional Amendments was achieved by providing selective amnesty to 8 MPs from VMRO-DPMNE accused of violations for abuse of office, in exchange for their support in passing the constitutional changes. 3 passing of a referendum, a criteria which has not been satisfied. Levica also calls for a revision of the Friendship Agreement with Bulgaria arguing that it is an example of historical revisionism and rehabilitation of fasicsim from the Second World War. The party is in favour of EU membership. Levica is the only Parliamentary Party which calls for closer economic and social cooperation with PR China as part of the 17+1 and the BRI: “Lifting of the bilateral relations with the People’s Republic of China to the level of strategic partnership (including cooperation in the framework of the 17+1 initiative as well as support for the Belt and Road Initiative), with a focus on infrastructural connectivity and cultural cooperation.” It stands for anti-imperialist international relations (including a withdrawal from participation in all military missions unless they are under an UN mandate. Finally, it calls for the country’s withdrawal from the Prague declaration which “shamefully equates communism and fascism thus revising the historical role of the Macedonian national liberation movement and the anti-fascist movement in the Second World War”.6 The Democratic Party of Albanians (DPA) DPA’s programme reiterates its supports for the Euro-Atlantic integrations of the country, including the fulfilment of all obligations arising from NATO membership, and the achievement of EU membership status by 2025. Conclusion The electoral programmes of 5 out of the 6 Parliamentary Parties are very similar. SDSM, VMRO, DUI, DPA and ASA are all in favour of active participation in NATO, as well as a focus on the attainment of EU membership. What is more, all 5 parties, portray EU and NATO membership as almost automatic guarantors of peace, stability and prosperity. In view of this apparent consensus amongst the large majority of parliamentary parties, it is to be expected that Macedonian foreign relations course will remain unchanged in the next 4 years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Snapshot Report
    SNAPSHOT REPORT OF THE RESEARCH PROJECT: REFUGEELAW.MK “REFUGEES AND MIGRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BALKAN ROUTE – NORTH MACEDONIA’S DISCOURSE DURING 2020 EARLY GENERAL ELECTIONS” Alumni 6 students Mentors 3 Months of historical SNAPSHOT REPORT OF THE RESEARCH REPORT PROJECT: SNAPSHOT 4 overview and context Months research period on daily basis 5 Discourse study areas: 3 public, media and political Focus groups 6 Sources (news, posts, shows, press conferences, events, statements, debates, rallies, articles, columns, 1433 interviews, video records). Comprehensive study to be published in November 2020 1 “REFUGEES AND MIGRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BALKAN ROUTE –NORTH MACEDONIA’S DISCOURSE DURING 2020 EARLY GENERAL ELECTIONS” DISCOURSE DURING 2020 EARLY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BALKAN MACEDONIA’S ROUTE –NORTH “REFUGEES AND MIGRATION SNAPSHOT REPORT of the research project: “Refugees and Migration in the context of the Balkan Route –North Macedonia’s discourse during 2020 early general elections” BACKGROUND The project aimed at identifying and analyzing the public, political and media discourse in North Macedonia on issues related to refugees and migration flows in the context of the Balkan route prior and in the course of the political campaign for early parliamentary elections in 2020. The EU’s non-decision in October 2019 for North Macedonia and Albania has triggered an enormous amount of discon- tent in the country and the setting convoluted by early spring due to COVID-19 outbreak when elections were postponed. The already grave political situation was additionally triggered by the enhanced refugee and migration flows, spurring the public, political and media discourse with nationalism, xenophobia and hate speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Obama Or the Platform from Tirana
    Macedonian Obama or the Platform from Tirana MACEDONIAN OBAMA OR THE PLATFORM FROM TIRANA: A Guide to the Integrative Power Sharing Model1 INTRODUCTION In principle, overcoming the ethnic barriers to win votes from the “others” at the elections in mixed societies is a difficult task. Does Macedonia need such reform in the political and electoral system? Is our society matured to surpass all ethnic barriers during the voting process? Do the parties and candidates offer programs that are acceptable to all citizens regardless of their ethnic background? If yes, is Macedonia one of the rare multiethnic countries where the conflicts are to be con- sidered as finished, thing of the past. We claim that this is not that case and that we need to dedicate ourselves to legal reforms and policy making that will system- atically induce moderate behavior and cooperation between the elites representing the ethnic groups in the country. Macedonia needs reform of its political system so that the electoral laws would encourage and privilege interethnic agreements, the so-called interethnic (accomodation).2 1 Authors of the study are 1. Zhidas Daskalovski, PhD, 2. Kristijan Trajkovski, and the Centre for Research and Policy Making team. www.crpm.org.mk 2 See Sisk 1996, кај Reilly, B. (2001) Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, and in Horowitz, D. L. (1985) Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1991, и The Deadly Ethnic Riot.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualitative Study
    A PROJECT OF THE INTERNATIONAL REPUBLICAN INSTITUTE I JUST WANT SOMEONE TO RESPOND TO MY EMAIL”: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ON UNDECIDED VOTERS’ VIEWS AND EXPERIENCE WITH LOCAL AND NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS IN NORTH MACEDONIA I JUST WANT SOMEONE TO RESPOND TO MY EMAIL”: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ON UNDECIDED VOTERS’ VIEWS AND EXPERIENCE WITH LOCAL AND NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS IN NORTH MACEDONIA Center for Insights in Survey Research IRI.org @IRIglobal © 2021 All Rights Reserved “I JUST WANT SOMEONE TO RESPOND TO MY EMAIL”: Qualitative research on undecided voters’ views and experience with local and national governments in North Macedonia Copyright © 2021 International Republican Institute. All rights reserved. Permission Statement: No part of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the written permission of the International Republican Institute. Requests for permission should include the following information: • The title of the document for which permission to copy material is desired. • A description of the material for which permission to copy is desired. • The purpose for which the copied material will be used and the manner in which it will be used. • Your name, title, company or organization name, telephone number, fax number, e-mail address and mailing address. Please send all requests for permission to: Attn: Department of External Affairs International Republican Institute 1225 Eye Street NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] IRI | North Macedonia – Focus Group Research on Local and National Governments 1 IRI IN NORTH MACEDONIA A nonprofit, nonpartisan organization founded in 1983, parties, transparency, and accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • Political History of the Balkans (1989–2018) This Page Intentionally Left Blank POLITICAL HISTORY of the BALKANS (1989–2018) Edited by József Dúró – Zoltán Egeresi
    The Balkan Peninsula has played a crucial role in human history many times. The region framed the 20th century. The end of the Political History of the Balkans Cold War also had a significant effect on the region as it resulted (1989–2018) in bloody wars, economic collapse and complicated political transitions. The 2000s and 2010s opened the way towards EU membership, as many countries received candidate status and launched accession negotiations – however, this process has recently been facing obstacles. Political History This volume provides a general overview of the Post-Cold War history of the Balkans and explores the dynamics behind these tremendous changes ranging from democratic transitions to EU prospects. The authors describe the transitional period, the evolution of the political system and highlight the most important of the Balkans political developments in each country in the region. We recommend this book to those who seek a deeper insight into the recent history of the Balkans and a deeper understanding of its political developments. (1989–2018) POLITICAL HISTORY OF THE BALKANS (1989—2018) POLITICAL HISTORY The work was created in commission of the National University of Public Service under the priority project PACSDOP-2.1.2-CCHOP-15-2016-00001 entitled “Public Service Development Establishing Good Governance”. Zoltán Egeresi (eds.): Egeresi Zoltán — József Dúró József Edited by JÓZSEF DÚRÓ European Social Fund ZOLTÁN EGERESI INVESTING IN YOUR FUTURE Political History of the Balkans (1989–2018) This page intentionally left blank POLITICAL HISTORY OF THE BALKANS (1989–2018) Edited by József Dúró – Zoltán Egeresi Dialóg Campus Budapest, 2020 The work was created in commission of the National University of Public Service under the priority project PACSDOP-2.1.2-CCHOP-15-2016-00001 entitled “Public Service Development Establishing Good Governance”.
    [Show full text]
  • North Macedonia
    BTI 2020 Country Report North Macedonia This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2020. It covers the period from February 1, 2017 to January 31, 2019. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of governance in 137 countries. More on the BTI at https://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2020 Country Report — North Macedonia. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2020. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2020 | North Macedonia 3 Key Indicators Population M 2.1 HDI 0.759 GDP p.c., PPP $ 16359 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 0.0 HDI rank of 189 82 Gini Index 35.6 Life expectancy years 75.6 UN Education Index 0.697 Poverty3 % 9.7 Urban population % 58.0 Gender inequality2 0.145 Aid per capita $ 72.0 Sources (as of December 2019): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2019 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2019. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary North Macedonia has a new government after 11 years of absolute political control by the right- wing conservative party, the Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization – Democratic Party for Macedonian National Unity (VMRO-DPMNE) and its junior coalition partner, the ethnic Albanian Democratic Union for Integration (DUI).
    [Show full text]
  • The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (11 December 2016)
    http://assembly.coe.int Doc. 14238 23 January 2017 Observation of the early parliamentary elections in “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (11 December 2016) Election observation report Ad hoc Committee of the Bureau Rapporteur: Mr Stefan SCHENNACH, Austria, Socialist Group Contents Page 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Political background..................................................................................................................................2 3. Legal framework........................................................................................................................................3 4. Electoral administration, voters lists and the registration of candidates.....................................................3 5. Election campaign and finance and media environment........................................................................... 5 6. Early voting and polling day...................................................................................................................... 7 7. Conclusions.............................................................................................................................................. 8 Appendix 1 – Statement by the pre-electoral delegation.............................................................................10 Appendix 2 – Programme of the pre-electoral mission (21-22 November 2016)........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom House, Its Academic Advisers, and the Author(S) of This Report
    Macedonia By Jovan Bliznakovski Capital: Skopje Population: 2.08 million GNI/capita, PPP: $14,310 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 National Democratic 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.75 5.00 4.75 Governance Electoral Process 3.50 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.00 Civil Society 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.25 3.25 3.25 Independent Media 4.25 4.25 4.50 4.75 4.75 5.00 5.00 5.25 5.25 5.00 Local Democratic 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 4.00 4.00 4.00 Governance Judicial Framework 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.50 4.75 4.75 and Independence Corruption 4.25 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.25 4.25 4.50 4.75 4.75 Democracy Score 3.86 3.79 3.82 3.89 3.93 4.00 4.07 4.29 4.43 4.36 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. If consensus cannot be reached, Freedom House is responsible for the final ratings. The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of Municipal Elections in “The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (15 October 2017)
    34th SESSION Report CPL34(2018)02final 16 March 2018 Observation of municipal elections in “The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (15 October 2017) Monitoring Committee Rapporteur:1 Karim VAN OVERMEIRE, Belgium (R, NR) RECOMMENDATION 413 (2018) ...........................................................................................................2 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM ..........................................................................................................4 Summary Upon invitation from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of “The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”, the Congress, from 11 to 16 October 2017, carried out a mission to observe the local elections held on 15 October 2017. The delegation included 13 members visiting some 100 polling stations throughout the country on Election Day, in a joint effort with the OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission. The vote on 15 October 2017 took place against the background of a long-lasting political crisis and the formation of a new Government in May 2017, thus constituting also a test for the new administration at the national level. Although the atmosphere of the election campaign improved, notably with regard to the media coverage, the overall political situation continued to be characterised by the deep division and politicisation of the country along ethnic and party lines. The Congress concluded that the 2017 local elections were generally well organised and in line with international standards. In the large majority of places visited by the Congress teams, the Election Day progressed in an – overall – orderly and calm manner with some procedural irregularities. According to the Congress, improvements should be made with regard to the election administration including transparency of the decision-making and training of the staff at all level, and a further depoliticisation of the State Election Commission (SEC).
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonia Support Initiative (Msi) Final Report
    MACEDONIA SUPPORT INITIATIVE (MSI) FINAL REPORT JANUARY 2019 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by AECOM International Development. MACEDONIA SUPPORT INITIATIVE (MSI) FINAL REPORT Submitted to: USAID Office of Transition Initiatives Prepared by: AECOM International Development Cover Photo: Morning show “I Love Macedonia” by TV Sitel for USAID DISCLAIMER: The authors’ views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. MACEDONIA SUPPORT INITIATIVE (MSI) PAGE i TABLE OF Acronyms iii Executive Summary 1 CONTENTS Program Background 4 Country Context 5 Program Description and Strategy 9 Media Cluster 11 Civic Engagement Cluster 13 Good Governance Cluster 15 Overall Program Highlights and Achievements 17 Supporting Pluralistic Media Content 23 Yesterday’s News 24 On the Same Side 25 Professionalization of the Media Landscape 27 Only the Truth 28 Click Plus 28 Media Forum Innovation 29 Award-Winning MSI Partners and Productions 29 Responding to the Need for Critical Reforms 32 Government Strategic Communications 32 Decentralization and Local Governance Empowerment 33 National Committee for Countering Violent Extremism and Counterterrorism (NCCVECT) 34 Key Reform Technical Support 35 Effecting Change Through Civic Engagement 35 Civic Capstone Events 37 Summary of Recent Activities 38 Program Performance Management and Evaluation 39 Lessons Learned 41 Best Practices
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Contributing to the Emergence of Different Kinds of Parties Representing Ethnic Minorities in Eastern and Southeastern Europe
    Factors Contributing to the Emergence of Different Kinds of Parties Representing Ethnic Minorities in Eastern and Southeastern Europe By Kyrylo Shturbabin Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Matthijs Bogaards Budapest, Hungary 2020 CEU eTD Collection Abstract This thesis examines the influence of institutional and political factors on the type of parties representing ethnic minorities in six states of Eastern and Southeastern Europe. This work classifies the parties representing ethnic minorities based on their stance towards integration and majority-minority relations. That allows to test whether such factors as electoral systems, ethnic politics regulations and characteristics of the party systems produce integrationist ethnic minority parties, particularistic ethnic minority parties or accommodative majority parties. Using comparative case study this thesis finds that electoral designs and ethnic politics regulations, such as reserved seats, grand coalition requirements and closed lists PR electoral systems, favour the emergence of particularistic ethnic minority parties, while ethnic party ban and open lists PR systems favour the emergence of integrationist ethnic minority parties or accommodative majority parties. The results also suggest that the party system stability and consolidation favour accommodative majority parties over integrationist ethnic minority parties. The results based on the research
    [Show full text]
  • North Macedonia: in Brief
    North Macedonia: In Brief May 29, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45739 SUMMARY R45739 North Macedonia: In Brief May 29, 2019 The United States has supported North Macedonia since its independence from Yugoslavia in 1991 and strongly backs its European Union (EU) and NATO ambitions. (The country’s Sarah E. Garding constitutional name was the Republic of Macedonia until February 2019, when it was renamed Analyst in Balkan and the Republic of North Macedonia.) On multiple occasions, the United States played a key role in Southeast Europe Affairs defusing political crises and interethnic tensions in North Macedonia. For more than two decades, a U.S. diplomat led United Nations–brokered negotiations between Greece and then-Macedonia to resolve their bilateral dispute over the latter’s use of the name Macedonia. With strong U.S. support, in 2018 North Macedonia and Greece reached the landmark Prespa Agreement, which resulted in the name change and resolved their bilateral dispute. Many Members of Congress have supported North Macedonia’s integration into Euro-Atlantic institutions. In 2007, the NATO Freedom Consolidation Act (P.L. 110-17) was passed to affirm congressional support for enlargement and make North Macedonia eligible for assistance under the NATO Participation Act of 1994. Resolutions were also sponsored in both chambers in 2018 to support the Prespa Agreement with Greece and endorse North Macedonia’s bid for NATO membership. Congressional interest in North Macedonia is also connected to broader policy concerns over the influence of Russia, China, and other external actors in the Western Balkans. In 2017, North Macedonia emerged from a destabilizing two-year crisis with a new government that pledged to redouble the country’s Euro-Atlantic integration efforts and enact reforms to tackle the corruption and state capture that took root under previous governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Agata Domachowska North Macedonia Before the April Census
    Editorial Team: Beata Surmacz (Director of ICE), Tomasz Stępniewski (Deputy No. 319 (16/2021) | 27.01.2021 Director of ICE), Agnieszka Zajdel (Editorial Assistant), Aleksandra Kuczyńska-Zonik, Jakub Olchowski, Konrad Pawłowski, Agata Tatarenko ISSN 2657-6996 © IEŚ Agata Domachowska North Macedonia before the April census This year, for the first time in 19 years, a census will be conducted in North Macedonia. The last one took place in 2002, and the decision was made by the Macedonian parliament on January 21, 2021 to finally conduct it after it had been postponed several times. Consequently, the exact number of inhabitants of North Macedonia is unknown. The census continues to evoke political emotions and ethnic tensions. Censuses in Macedonia. Since Macedonia’s declaration of independence in 1991, there have been two censuses in the country – in 1994 and in 2002. According to the data from the last of them, the country had around 2 million inhabitants (2 022 547). Macedonians constitute 64.18%, and the second largest nationality are Albanians – 25.17%. Some Albanians, however, claim that these numbers are significantly underestimated, and in fact they constitute up to 35-40% of the country’s total population. Apart from them, Turks (3.85%), Roma (2.66%), Serbs (1.78%), and Vlachs (0.48%) live in North Macedonia. The next census was scheduled for 2011, initially in April, then postponed to October. Due to strong tensions within the government coalition, however, it was stopped due to technical problems and methodological inconsistencies. In 2018, Macedonia’s Special Prosecutor launched an investigation against former Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski (Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization – Democratic Party for Macedonian National Unity, VMRO-DPMNE) and his co-coalition partner Ali Ahmeti, leader of the Democratic Union for Integration (DUI).
    [Show full text]