DOCSLIB.ORG

The Functional Hearing Inventory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Functional Hearing Inventory THE FUNCTIONAL HEARING INVENTORY: CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY AND INTERRATER RELIABILITY by PAMELA M. BROADSTON, B.S., M.A. A DISSERTATION IN SPECIAL EDUCATION Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION Approved December, 2003 Copyright 2003, Pamela M. Broadston ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I thank my Lord, Jesus Christ for opening the door that provided the opportunity for me to obtain this degree. Without His almighty love and endless grace, I would never have achieved this milestone. This milestone could also never have been achieved without the love and support of my family. I cannot proceed without first acknowledging them: to my parents who provided constant love and support throughout this entire endeavor; to my brother Bob, without his financial support I would probably still be working on my master's degrees one class at a time; to my sister, who allowed me to vent and provided sound advice during trying times; to my baby brother, Jeff, thanks for believing in me. I most gratefully thank my dissertation committee for their wisdom, support, and constructive criticism. Their dedication and skilled instruction were vital to the completion of this project. They include: Dr. Carol Layton who provided me with her expertise and guidance in diagnostics and assessment, Dr. Nora Griffm-Shirley who got me hooked on O&M, and Dr. Robert Kennedy who patiently explained and re-explained statistics, time and time again. Last but not least, I want to thank my chair. Dr. Roseanna Davidson, for providing the resources and opportunities that enhanced my doctoral studies and for her expertise and guidance into the field of deafblindness. I sincerely thank Gillis Ward, my second rater, who allowed me to totally control her life for four weeks. Without her willingness to drop everything and show up when and where I asked her, I would never have completed the data collection. Thank you Gillis, you are the best. I also want to thank the many professionals who assisted me at various stages of the FHI development and this dissertation research. Some of these professionals include: John Macias for his professional input and constant support and encouragement, Marcella Dalla Rosa for allowing me access to her staff and students (Cheers), Theresa Mays for contacting parents, all of the teachers and staff at the residential school for allowing me free access to your classrooms and school activities, Candace Bums and Jim Vander Putten for editing my proposal, my colleagues and friends at UALR for their constant words of support and encouragement, Paul Pagliano, Pat Kelley, Jim Durkle, Suzanne House, Hansel Burley and NTAC for their input when this project was in its infancy. And a very special thanks to Margaret Robinson, my friend and colleague, for teaching me PowerPoint and table formatting, and for walking around for days with a sound level meter attached to her hip. A special thanks is extended to the parents and students who participated in this research project. Without you this research could not have been completed. Ill TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii ABSTRACT viii LIST OF TABLES x CHAPTER I. OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY 1 Introduction 1 Significance of the Study 7 Statement of the Problem 7 Purpose of the Study 8 Research Questions 8 Null Hypotheses 9 Definition of Terms 9 Delimitations 11 Assumption 12 Organization of the Study 12 H: REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE 13 Role of Hearing 13 Primitive Level 13 Signal Warning 14 Spoken Communication 14 IV Impact of Hearing Loss 15 In Adult Lives 15 In Infant's and Young Children's Lives 16 Hearing Impairment 18 Age of Onset 18 Severity or Degree of Hearing Loss 19 Types of Hearing Loss 20 Assessment of Hearing in Infants and Children 22 Basic Audiometric Assessments 22 Physiological Tests 25 Limitations of Traditional Audiological Testing 27 Infants and Young Children 27 Children with Multiple Disabilities 28 Functional Hearing Screenings/Assessments with Limitations of Each 29 Infants and Young Children 29 Children with Multiple Disabilities 30 Summary 33 m. METHOD 35 Introduction 35 Setting 36 Participants 36 Participant Selection 36 Purposeful Sample 37 Demographic Data 37 Informed Consent 37 Research Design 3g Instrument Development 38 Validity 40 Criterion-Related Validity 43 Interrater Reliability 44 Data Collection 46 Data Analysis 46 Materials 49 Summary 49 IV. RESULTS 51 Introduction 51 Research Questions 52 Null Hypotheses 52 Demographics 52 Criterion-Related Validity 57 Interrater Reliability 61 Summary 64 V. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND IMPLICATIONS 66 Summary 66 VI Limitations of the Study 67 Conclusions 68 Recommendations 71 Implications 73 BIBLIOGRAPHY 76 APPENDIX A: PARTICIPATION LETTER, INFORMED CONSENT FORMS, AND INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD EXEMPTION 83 B: FHI TEACHER QUESTIONNAIRE AND FHI PARENT QUESTIONNAIRE 88 Vll ABSTRACT The Functional Hearing Inventory (FHI), an observational instrument for functional hearing, provides information about how a deafblind child uses his/her residual hearing within his/her natural environment. This study obtained evidence of the validity and reliability of the FHI. In particular, criterion-related validity for the FHI was investigated by correlating it with teachers' and parents' ratings of functional hearing, and the traditional measure of hearing, the audiogram. Interrater reliability for the FHI was studied through correlating the FHI ratings of deafblind subjects by two trained evaluators using point-by-point and consensus methods. The two raters included the researcher and one other rater who was trained by the researcher. The raters observed students in their natural settings and recorded the information on the FHI observation form. The subjects for this study were a purposeful sample of students between the ages of three and twenty-one who were reported on the Federal Deafblind Census. There were 14 participants for whom there was complete information, comprising 6 females (43%) and 8 males (57%). The demographic section indicated that 57% of the participants were male, and 57% were Caucasian. The majority of the participants are in their teens with 21% being in the 7* grade. Over 42% of the participants had a primary disability of deafblindness and four of the participants had a secondary disability of either hearing or visual impairment. vui Cohen' s kappa was used to measure agreement for criterion validity as well as to determine interrater reliability. Null hypotheses of no relationship between the FHI and teachers' ratings, and between thd^HI and parents' ratings were rejected, with a moderate relationship in the former case (K = 0.46, p = 0.0043), and with a somewhat weaker relationship in the latter case (K = 0.22, p = 0.01 ). The null hypothesis between the FHI and the audiogram could not be rejected (K = 0.13, p = 0.26). The null hypothesis for interrater reliability was rejected for environmental conditions/background noise, signal, and response levels. The respective kappas were 0.96 (p < 0.0000001), 0.85 (p < 0.0000001), and 0.81 (p < 0.0000001), all considered to be high levels of association. IX LIST OF TABLES 1 Levels of Hearing Loss with Implications 20 2 Levels of Response with Descriptions 39 3 Criterion Validity by histrument. Source, Scale, and Technique 48 4 Frequency Distribution by Gender 53 5 Frequency Distribution by Age 54 6 Frequency Distribution by Grade 55 7 Frequency Distribution by Ethnicity 55 8 Frequency Distribution by Primary Disability 56 9 Frequency Distribution by Secondary Disability 56 10 Frequency Distribution of Students wearing Hearing Aids During FHI Observations 57 11 Cohen' s Kappa between FHI Ratings and Teachers' Ratings of Hearing Functioning 58 12 Cohen' s Kappa between FHI Ratings and Parents' Ratings of Hearing Functioning 59 13 Cohen' s Kappa between FHI Ratings and Audiogram 61 14 Cohen' s Kappa between Trained Evaluators' FHI Environmental Conditions/Background Noise Measurements 62 15 Cohen' s Kappa between Trained Evaluators' FHI Intensity of Signals Measurements 63 16 Cohen' s Kappa between Trained Evaluators' FHI Levels of Response 63 CHAPTER I OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY Introduction Deafblindness is a multifaceted disability that impacts an individual in compound and complex ways. "The deaf-blind child is not a deaf child who cannot see or a blind child who cannot hear. The problem is not an additive one of deafness plus blindness" (Mclnnes & Treffery, 1982, p. 2). Deafblindness impacts the use of the distance senses of vision and hearing, as well as the development of communication and perception. Because of the impact that this dual-sensory impairment has on children with deafblindness it is necessary to provide educational instruction in the use of residual hearing and vision for these children, and to provide appropriate access to the environment in which they live. Intervention can significantly expand the learning potential of children who are deafblind (Miles & Riggio, 1999). The development of goals and objectives for intervention should be based on the needs of each individual child as revealed through appropriate educational assessment. Information about access to the environment also needs to be obtained as part of the assessment process for children who are deafblind. (Olson, Miles, & Riggio, 1999, pp. 78-93). "The primary purpose of assessment is to provide information that can serve as the basis for intervention" (Flexer, 1999, p. 27). Therefore, quality program planning for students with deafblindness must begin with assessment. Eyre (2000) says, "Assessment goes hand in hand with curriculum" (p. 127). "Our assessments will reveal the stages they (children with deafblindness) have reached in each of the areas within curriculum and from there, we can plan next steps to take with them. In most schools, long-term aims or goals and short-term objectives or steps are used to plan this future work with the child" (p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Screening Guide for Usher Syndrome
    Screening Guide for Usher Syndrome Florida Outreach Project for Children and Young Adults Who Are Deaf-Blind Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services Florida Department of Education 2012 This publication was produced through the Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services (BEESS) Resource and Information Center, Division of Public Schools, Florida Department of Education, and is available online at http://www.fldoe.org/ese/pub-home.asp. For information on available resources, contact the BEESS Resource and Information Center (BRIC). BRIC website: http://www.fldoe.org/ese/clerhome.asp Bureau website: http://fldoe.org/ese/ Email: [email protected] Telephone: (850) 245-0475 Fax: (850) 245-0987 This document was developed by the Florida Instructional Materials Center for the Visually Impaired, Outreach Services for the Blind/Visually Impaired and Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing, and the Resource Materials and Technology Center for the Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing, special projects funded by the Florida Department of Education, Division of Public Schools, BEESS, through federal assistance under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, in conjunction with the Florida Outreach Project for Children and Young Adults Who Are Deaf- Blind, H326C990032, which is funded by the Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education. Information contained within this publication does not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Education. Edited by: Susan Lascek, Helen Keller National Center Emily Taylor-Snell, Florida Project for Children and Young Adults Who Are Deaf-Blind Dawn Saunders, Florida Department of Education Leanne Grillot, Florida Department of Education Adapted with permission from the Nebraska Usher Syndrome Screening Project (2002) Copyright State of Florida Department of State 2012 Authorization for reproduction is hereby granted to the state system of public education consistent with section 1006.03(2), Florida Statutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlations Between Audiogram and Objective Hearing Tests in Sensorineural Hearing Loss
    International Tinnitus Journal, Vol. 5, No.2, 107-112 (1999) Correlations Between Audiogram and Objective Hearing Tests in Sensorineural Hearing Loss L. Bishara,1 J. Ben-David,l L. Podoshin,1 M. Fradis,l C.B. Teszler,l H. Pratt,2 T. Shpack,3 H. Feiglin,3 H. Hafner,3 and N. Herlinger2 I Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, and 3Institute of Audiology, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, and 2Evoked Potentials Laboratory, Technion, Haifa, Israel Abstract: Owing to its subjective nature, behavioral pure-tone audiometry often is an unre­ liable testing method in uncooperative subjects, and assessing the true hearing threshold be­ comes difficult. In such cases, objective tests are used for hearing-threshold determination (i.e., auditory brainstem evoked potentials [ABEP] and frequency-specific auditory evoked potentials: slow negative response at 10 msec [SN-1O]). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between pure-tone audiogram shape and the predictive accuracy of SN-IO and ABEP in normal controls and in patients suf­ fering from sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). One-hundred-and-fifty subjects aged 15 to 70, some with normal hearing and the remainder with SNHL, were tested prospectively in a double-blind design. The battery of tests included pure-tone audiometry (air and bone conduction), speech reception threshold, ABEP, and SN- 10. Patients with SNHL were divided into four categories according to audiogram shape (i.e., flat, ascending, descending, and all other shapes). The results showed that ABEP predicts behavioral thresholds at 3 kHz and 4 kHz in cases of high-frequency hearing loss.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE REPORT 48-Year-Old Man
    THE PATIENT CASE REPORT 48-year-old man SIGNS & SYMPTOMS – Acute hearing loss, tinnitus, and fullness in the left ear Dennerd Ovando, MD; J. Walter Kutz, MD; Weber test lateralized to the – Sergio Huerta, MD right ear Department of Surgery (Drs. Ovando and Huerta) – Positive Rinne test and and Department of normal tympanometry Otolaryngology (Dr. Kutz), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas (Dr. Huerta) Sergio.Huerta@ THE CASE UTSouthwestern.edu The authors reported no A healthy 48-year-old man presented to our otolaryngology clinic with a 2-hour history of potential conflict of interest hearing loss, tinnitus, and fullness in the left ear. He denied any vertigo, nausea, vomiting, relevant to this article. otalgia, or otorrhea. He had noticed signs of a possible upper respiratory infection, including a sore throat and headache, the day before his symptoms started. His medical history was unremarkable. He denied any history of otologic surgery, trauma, or vision problems, and he was not taking any medications. The patient was afebrile on physical examination with a heart rate of 48 beats/min and blood pressure of 117/68 mm Hg. A Weber test performed using a 512-Hz tuning fork lateral- ized to the right ear. A Rinne test showed air conduction was louder than bone conduction in the affected left ear—a normal finding. Tympanometry and otoscopic examination showed the bilateral tympanic membranes were normal. THE DIAGNOSIS Pure tone audiometry showed severe sensorineural hearing loss in the left ear and a poor speech discrimination score. The Weber test confirmed the hearing loss was sensorineu- ral and not conductive, ruling out a middle ear effusion.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDICINE TODAY Audiometry -~60
    9 November 196S Schizophrenia-Freeman MEDIALSHRNAL 373 In the Salford comprehensive community mental health ser- FURTHER READING vice vulnerable cases of schizophrenia have been treated with Bennett, D. H., New Aspects of the Mental Health Services, ed. H. L. Frceman and J. Farndale, 1967. Oxford. this preparation for nearly two years and experience has been Brown, G. W., Bone, M., Dalison, B., and Wing, J. K., Schizophrenia gained in over 100 cases. This confirms results from elsewhere and Social Care, 1966. London. Br Med J: first published as 10.1136/bmj.4.5627.373 on 9 November 1968. Downloaded from Kinross-Wright, J., and Charalampous, K. D., Int. 7. Neuropsychiat., that it represents an important step forward in the community 1965, 1, 66. management of schizophrenia. The injections may be given in Psychiatric Hospital Care, ed. H. L. Freeman, 1965. London. Treatment of Mental Disorders in the Community, ed. G. R. Daniel and hospital clinics, at general practitioners' surgeries, or by nurses 1968. London. at the patients' homes. An interested family doctor can H. L. Freeman, certainly make a big contribution to the community care of his schizophrenic patients by undertaking these injections, since it is possible to do a rapid check on the mental state B.M.J. Publications at the same time, or perhaps receive a report from an The following are available from the Publishing Manager, B.M.A. accompanying relative. It may also be necessary to issue House, Tavistock Square, London W.C.1. The prices include regular prescriptions for antiparkinsonian drugs, since side- postage. effects are fairly common, at least in the early stages of the The New Gcneral Practice ..
    [Show full text]
  • 56-Questions for Your Audiologist
    56 Tips for Home or School Questions For Your Audiologist By: Jill Grattan, Nevada Dual Sensory Impairment Project March, 2011 1. What is my child’s hearing loss in each ear? 2. What is the type of hearing loss my child has (e.g., conductive, sensorineural, mixed)? 3. What type of sounds and noises will he/she have difficulty hearing? 4. Will his/her hearing be affected by noisy environments and background noise (e.g., will he/she hear less in a class- room or restaurant)? 5. What, if any, medical condition does my child have? 6. Does my child have a progressive/degenerative condition? 6a. If yes, how rapidly should one expect changes to occur? 6b. What behaviors might I observe that indicate a change in my child’s hearing? 7. How often should my child visit an audiologist to check his/her hearing? 8. What suggestions do you have for the teacher working with my child? 9. What information should be shared with the people who interact with my child? 10. What assistive listening devices might benefit my child? 11. What adaptations do you think my child might need in the educational setting or at home? 12. What should be expected in terms of daily functioning (e.g., strain, headaches, frustration, etc.)? Screening Questions 1. What does the ‘newborn hearing screening test’ actually screen for? 1a. Can my child pass this test and still be hearing impaired? 2. Tests related to hearing and functioning of the ear: • Impedance testing - Tympanogram; Acoustic Reflex Test • Behavioral Testing - Behavioral Audiome- try; Pure-Tone Audiometry or Pure-Tone • Otoacoustic Emissions Testing (OAEs) Air Conduction Testing; Pure-Tone Bone • Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Conduction Testing; Visual Reinforce- • Speech Audiometry - Speech Awareness Threshold (SAT) or ment Audiometry (VRA); Conditioned Speech Detection Threshold (SDT); Speech Reception Thresh- Play Audiometry old or Speech Recognition Threshold (SRT) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Audiometric Test Procedures
    Audiometric Test Procedures 101 This information is meant to help you better understand the various test procedures as well as some of the terms you might see on an audiometric report. By Larry Medwetsky individual could, in fact, exhibit nor- In the previous issue of Hearing mal hearing acuity across these three Loss Magazine, I provided an over- Anyone who has ever had their frequencies, yet, exhibit a significant view concerning hearing threshold hearing tested should know how hearing loss in the higher frequencies results as recorded on the audiogram to read the audiogram, but that’s (3000-8000 Hz). Thus, it is important and an explanation of the pure-tone easier said than done. Hopefully, to examine the SRT in the context of audiogram. In this article, I will after reading this article you will the other audiometric test findings. describe various test procedures have a greater understanding of the Speech Awareness Threshold that are typically administered in principles discussed and use your (SAT): an audiometric evaluation and what knowledge going forward—be it in Compound words are pre- information the tests provide. reviewing hearing test results you sented, the goal being to determine already have or when discussing your the softest level one can detect the Audiometric Test Procedures results at your next hearing test. presence of words. This test is often Pure-tone Audiometry: Tones of used when an individual’s hearing loss different frequencies are presented; the is so great that the person is unable goal is to find the softest sound level relatively flat hearing losses, and the to recognize/repeat the words, yet is which one can hear (threshold) the average of 500 and 1000 Hz for those aware that words have been presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Policy: Central Auditory Processing Disorder Reference Number: HNCA.CP.MP.375 Effective Date: 10/07 Coding Implications Last Review Date: 3/21 Revision Log
    Clinical Policy: Central Auditory Processing Disorder Reference Number: HNCA.CP.MP.375 Effective Date: 10/07 Coding Implications Last Review Date: 3/21 Revision Log See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description Central auditory processing disorder (CAPD), also known as auditory processing disorder (APD), refers to the efficiency and effectiveness by which the central nervous system (CNS) utilizes auditory information in the perceptual processing of auditory information. The diagnosis, management, and even the existence of an auditory-specific perceptual deficit are controversial. Policy/Criteria I. It is the policy of Health Net of California that diagnostic testing and therapy for the management of central auditory processing disorder are considered investigational due to lack of scientific evidence to support the validity of any diagnostic tests and treatment. Background According to the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA), central auditory processing disorder (CAPD), also known as auditory processing disorder (APD), refers to difficulties in the perceptual processing of auditory information in the CNS as demonstrated by poor performance in one or more of the skills noted above. CAPD It is a complex and heterogeneous group of auditory-specific disorders usually associated with a range of listening and learning deficits. Children or adults suspected of CAPD may exhibit a variety of listening and related complaints such as difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments, following directions, and discriminating (or telling the difference between) similar-sounding speech sounds. The child may have difficulty with spelling, reading, and understanding information presented verbally in a classroom. Some individuals may also have behavioral, emotional or social difficulties.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Practice Guide for Social Workers in England and Wales Working with Adults with Acquired Hearing Loss
    Good Practice Guide for Social Workers in England and Wales Working with Adults with Acquired Hearing Loss Brian Crellin, Peter Simcock & Jacqui Bond www.basw.co.uk Contents Forewords ..................................................................................................................................... 3 About the Authors ...................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 5 Definitions ................................................................................................................................... 6 What is acquired hearing loss? ...................................................................................................... 6 Types of Acquired Hearing Loss ................................................................................................... 9 Registration and Acquired Hearing Loss ..................................................................................... 9 Incidence and Prevalence of Acquired Hearing Loss ........................................................ 10 Medical Assessment of Hearing Loss ....................................................................................12 Tinnitus and its Treatment .............................................................................................................13 Meniere’s Disease and its Treatment .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dba - Deafblind Australia
    DBA - DEAFBLIND AUSTRALIA Deafblind Australia DBA is a peak national organisation for the deafblind community in Australia. DBA welcomes the opportunity to comment on the inquiry into Hearing Health and Wellbeing to enable Government to engage with deafblind people needs and their supports to ensure they are provided with the care necessary to support their health and wellbeing. ABOUT DEAFBLIND AUSTRALIA (DBA) DBA was established in 1993 at the National Deafblind Conference in Melbourne, Victoria. This council was established to provide: security; sense of belonging; freedom of speech; and represent the Australian deafblind community and their supporting networks. At present, ADBC represents an estimated 300,000 deafblind people including those with multi disabilities, their families and organisations working the deafblind field. SUBMISSION INTO HEARING HEALTH AND WELLBING AFFECTING DEAFBLIND PEOPLE Throughout this submission, the terms deafblind, combined vision and hearing impairment and dual sensory impairment will be used interchangeably as all three are used to describe people with deafblindness. Deafblindness is described by Deafblind Australia as: “a unique and isolating sensory disability resulting from the combination of both a hearing and vision loss or impairment which significantly affects communication, socialisation mobility and daily living. People with deafblindness form a very diverse group due to the varying degrees of their vision and hearing impairments plus possible additional disabilities. This leads to a wide range of communication methods including speech, oral/aural communication, various forms of sign language including tactile, Deafblind fingerspelling, alternative and augmentative communication and print/ braille” Please see below responses to the terms of reference of the inquiry. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Deaf-Blindness; Rubella, CHARGE Syndrome, Usher’S Syndrome, Genetic Disorders, Accident and / Or Illness Are Some of the More Common Ones
    Deafblindness Deafblindness is a combination of vision and hearing loss. Deafblindness encompasses a spectrum from mildly hard of hearing plus mildly visually impaired to totally deaf and blind. It is rare that an individual with deafblindness would be completely blind and completely deaf. Individuals who have a combined vision and hearing loss have unique communication, learning, and mobility challenges due to their dual sensory loss. Deafblindness is a unique and diverse condition due to the wide range of sensory capabilities, possible presence of additional disabilities, and the age of onset for the vision and hearing loss. A child with deafblindness would include the infant who has a diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (a retinal condition that is associated with premature birth) and has an acquired hearing loss due to meningitis at age two. Another person with deafblindness may have been born with a profound hearing loss and developed a later vision loss due to a genetic condition called retinitis pigmentosa. There are many causes of deaf-blindness; Rubella, CHARGE Syndrome, Usher’s Syndrome, genetic disorders, accident and / or illness are some of the more common ones. Deafblindness occurs in three of 100,000 births. In Colorado, just over 140 children and youth (ages birth through 21 years) have been identified as having both a vision and hearing loss. These individuals are eligible for free technical assistance through the Colorado Services for Children and Youth with Combined Vision and Hearing Loss Project, located at the Colorado Department of Education. This project provides technical assistance which supports Colorado children and youth, birth to 21 years, who have BOTH a vision and hearing impairment.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Perspectives on the Pure-Tone Audiogram
    J Am Acad Audiol 28:655–671 (2017) Review Perspectives on the Pure-Tone Audiogram DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16061 Frank E. Musiek* Jennifer Shinn† Gail D. Chermak‡ Doris-Eva Bamiou§ Abstract Background: The pure-tone audiogram, though fundamental to audiology, presents limitations, espe- cially in the case of central auditory involvement. Advances in auditory neuroscience underscore the considerably larger role of the central auditory nervous system (CANS) in hearing and related disorders. Given the availability of behavioral audiological tests and electrophysiological procedures that can pro- vide better insights as to the function of the various components of the auditory system, this perspective piece reviews the limitations of the pure-tone audiogram and notes some of the advantages of other tests and procedures used in tandem with the pure-tone threshold measurement. Purpose: To review and synthesize the literature regarding the utility and limitations of the pure-tone audiogram in determining dysfunction of peripheral sensory and neural systems, as well as the CANS, and to identify other tests and procedures that can supplement pure-tone thresholds and provide en- hanced diagnostic insight, especially regarding problems of the central auditory system. Research Design: A systematic review and synthesis of the literature. Data Collection and Analysis: The authors independently searched and reviewed literature (journal articles, book chapters) pertaining to the limitations of the pure-tone audiogram. Results: The pure-tone audiogram provides information as to hearing sensitivity across a selected fre- quency range. Normal or near-normal pure-tone thresholds sometimes are observed despite cochlear damage. There are a surprising number of patients with acoustic neuromas who have essentially normal pure-tone thresholds.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Impairment Age-Related Macular
    VISUAL IMPAIRMENT AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION Macular degeneration is a medical condition predominantly found in young children in which the center of the inner lining of the eye, known as the macula area of the retina, suffers thickening, atrophy, and in some cases, watering. This can result in loss of side vision, which entails inability to see coarse details, to read, or to recognize faces. According to the American Academy of Ophthalmology, it is the leading cause of central vision loss (blindness) in the United States today for those under the age of twenty years. Although some macular dystrophies that affect younger individuals are sometimes referred to as macular degeneration, the term generally refers to age-related macular degeneration (AMD or ARMD). Age-related macular degeneration begins with characteristic yellow deposits in the macula (central area of the retina which provides detailed central vision, called fovea) called drusen between the retinal pigment epithelium and the underlying choroid. Most people with these early changes (referred to as age-related maculopathy) have good vision. People with drusen can go on to develop advanced AMD. The risk is considerably higher when the drusen are large and numerous and associated with disturbance in the pigmented cell layer under the macula. Recent research suggests that large and soft drusen are related to elevated cholesterol deposits and may respond to cholesterol lowering agents or the Rheo Procedure. Advanced AMD, which is responsible for profound vision loss, has two forms: dry and wet. Central geographic atrophy, the dry form of advanced AMD, results from atrophy to the retinal pigment epithelial layer below the retina, which causes vision loss through loss of photoreceptors (rods and cones) in the central part of the eye.
    [Show full text]