Performance Studies.Indb
Notes Chapter 1 1 Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato (eds), ! e Structuralist Controversy. ! e Language of Criticism and the Sciences of Man . Baltimore: ! e John Hopkins University Press, 2009, p. 152. 2 As detailed by Fran ç ois Cusset in French ! eory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. Transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States , trans. Je" Fort. University of Minnesota Press, 2008. 3 Richard Schechner, Performance Studies: An Introduction , Second edition. Routledge, 2006, p. 1. 4 John L. Austin, How to do ! ings with Words , Second edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975, pp. 21 – 2. 5 As writes Paul Eluard in his poetry ‘ ! e earth is blue ’ (1929). 6 Another way in the sense that we can see confronted here: the deconstructionist performativity of writing; performativity as an anthropological and esthetical re# exivity on theatrical performance; and the analytical performativity coming from the philosophy of ordinary language. In addition to the original exclusion of theatrical performance from the analysis of the performative by Austin, another antinomy arises between the use of the performative by Derrida and its elaboration by the tradition of analytical philosophy, by John Searle for instance. 7 ! e Structuralist Controversy, p. 13. 8 Plato, ‘ Io ’ , Early Socratic Dialogues. London: Penguin Classics, 2005. 9 Aby Warburg didn ’ t neglect in his iconological project the role of Dionysian impulses in the survival of forms. See Philippe-Alain Michaud, Aby Warburg and the Image in Motion . New York: Zone Books, 2004. 10 Antonin Artaud, ! e ! eatre and its Double , trans. Mary C. Richard. New York: Grove Press, 1994, p.
[Show full text]