Transportation System Plan 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transportation System Plan 2011 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN HOOD RIVER COUNTY ADOPTED JULY 2003 – COUNTY ORDINANCE #249 AMENDED JUNE 26, 2009 – COUNTY ORDINANCE #295 AMENDED MARCH 31, 2010 – COUNTY ORDINANCE #299 AMENDED NOVEMBER 21, 2011 – COUNTY ORDINANCE #306 Prepared for Hood River County Prepared by Cogan Owens Cogan, LLC and David Evans and Associates, Inc. With assistance from Hood River County Departments of Community Development and Public Works Oregon Department of Transportation Hood River County Transportation System Plan Technical Advisory Committee This project was funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Department of Land Conservation and Development. TGM grants rely on federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act and Oregon Lottery Funds. July 21, 2003 i-1 Hood River County Transportation System Plan HOOD RIVER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1997 Draft 2003 Update (Adopted) Hood River County (1997 + 2003) City of Hood River (1997 + 2003) City of Cascade Locks (1997 + 2003) Port of Hood River (1997 + 2003) Mt. Hood National Forest (1997 + 2003) Hood River County Transportation District (1997 + 2003) Hood River School District (1997 + 2003) Mt. Hood Railroad (1997 + 2003) Mt. Hood Meadows Ski Area (1997 + 2003) Hood River Valley Residents Committee (1997 + 2003) Hood River Chamber of Commerce (1997 + 2003) Oregon Department of Transportation (1997 + 2003) Transportation Growth Management (2003) Hood River County Public Works Advisory Committee (2003) West Side Rural Fire Protection District (2003) Citizens for Responsible Growth (2003) USFS, National Scenic Area Office (2003) Oregon Department of Land Conservation & Development (1997) Hood River Growers & Shippers Association (1997) Oregon Department of Forestry (1997) Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area (1997) Hood River County Sheriff’s Office (1997) City of Hood River Police Department (1997) Clackamas County (1997) Washington Department of Transportation (1997) Columbia Gorge Windsurfing Association (1997) Young & Morgan (1997) Edgefield Station, Inc. (1997) July 21, 2003 i-2 Hood River County Transportation System Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. PLANS AND STUDIES .................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 PLANS AND STUDIES AFFECTING HOOD RIVER COUNTY ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2.1 Federal and Statewide Plans and Studies ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2.2 OR 35 Corridor-Specific Plans and Studies ........................................................................................................ 1-6 1.3 PLANS FOR HOOD RIVER COUNTY ................................................................................................................................. 1-8 1.3.1 County Policy Document (1991) .......................................................................................................................... 1-8 1.3.2 Background Report (Amended August 1986) ....................................................................................................... 1-8 1.3.3 Zoning Map (1995) and Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances (1989), The Comprehensive Plan Map (1984), and the Exceptions Document (1984) ...................................................................................................................................... 1-8 1.3.4 Hood River County Bicycle Plan (2010) .............................................................................................................. 1-8 1.3.5 Hood River County Road Standards (Adopted April 1, 1985) ............................................................................. 1-9 1.3.6 Hood River County Fire Chiefs Association: Fire & Life Safety Requirements for Fire Department Access and Water Supplies ................................................................................................................................................................ 1-10 1.3.7 Findings of Compliance with Statewide Planning Goals and Acknowledged Plan Policies ............................. 1-10 1.4 OTHER RELEVANT PLANS AND STUDIES ........................................................................................................................ 1-10 1.4.1 City of Hood River Transportation System Plan (TSP) (Amended October, 2001) ........................................... 1-10 1.4.2 City of Cascade Locks Transportation System Plan (TSP) (Adopted November, 2001) .................................... 1-11 1.4.3 Hood River Airport Draft Master Plan 1990-2010 (July 1993)......................................................................... 1-11 2. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT/GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 ASSUMPTIONS ........................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT .............................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.3.1 Project Management Team .................................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.3.2 Technical Advisory Committee............................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.3.3 Issues Survey ........................................................................................................................................................ 2-2 2.3.4 Project Newsletters .............................................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.3.5 Open Houses ........................................................................................................................................................ 2-3 2.3.6 State Agency Review ............................................................................................................................................ 2-3 2.4 GOALS, POLICIES AND STRATEGIES FOR HOOD RIVER COUNTY ....................................................................................... 2-3 2.4.1 Goal A: Transportation Balance ......................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.4.2 Goal B: Connectivity ........................................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.4.3 Goal C: Highway & Roadway Congestion ....................................................................................................... 2-10 2.4.4 Goal D: Roadway Conditions ........................................................................................................................... 2-11 2.4.5 Goal E: Safety ................................................................................................................................................... 2-13 2.4.6 Goal F: Environmental and Energy Impacts .................................................................................................... 2-14 2.4.7 Goal G: Social and Land Use Impacts ............................................................................................................. 2-15 2.4.8 Goal H: Economic Impacts ............................................................................................................................... 2-17 2.4.9 Goal I: Funding ................................................................................................................................................ 2-18 3. CURRENT CONDITIONS............................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 ROADWAY SYSTEM ....................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 State Highways ..................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 State Highway Classification System ................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.3 Special Purpose Classification System ................................................................................................................ 3-3 3.2.4 Interstate and Regional Connectivity ..................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Financial Viability and Sustainability Benefits of Using Cargo Trikes Instead of Vans for ‘Last-Mile’ Logistics in London in the Age of Online Shopping
    The Financial Viability and Sustainability Benefits of Using Cargo Trikes Instead of Vans for ‘Last-Mile’ Logistics in London in the Age of Online Shopping The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Colson, Jeremy R. 2019. The Financial Viability and Sustainability Benefits of Using Cargo Trikes Instead of Vans for ‘Last-Mile’ Logistics in London in the Age of Online Shopping. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42004091 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use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
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Transport History 14.02.08
    Transport and urban form: Historical, counterfactual and evolutionary perspectives Stephen Marshall Bartlett School of Planning University College London TSU research seminar: 14 February 2008 Today’s presentation • To explore the relationship between transport and urban form • To explore how history can help us understand how cities work – then and now • Generally, to stimulate thought and discussion… may ask more questions than it answers The use of history • The past is not just another country to be explored for its own sake, like a case study of an exotic location. The use of history • The past is not just another country to be explored for its own sake, like a case study of an exotic location. • Not just ‘one damn fact after another’ The use of history • The past is not just another country to be explored for its own sake, like a case study of an exotic location. • Not just ‘one damn fact after another’ • Need not be ‘bunk’ The use of history History can teach us about the ‘how’ and ‘why’ of urban formation: • Awareness of particular influences or ‘determinants of form’ that no longer apply • Awareness of particular influences that continue now, but in past were clearer or ‘isolated’ (History as ‘control’) • Awareness of the ways in which the order of what happened affects formation – how ‘what already exists’ affects ‘what continues to exist’ The counterfactual • Not ‘just for fun’ • Helps us think through cause and effect mechanisms • More challenging than simply ‘knowing what happened’ The counterfactual • Counterfactual perspectives
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Utilitarian Cycling: a Case Study
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Transportation Research Procedia 14 ( 2016 ) 2352 – 2361 6th Transport Research Arena April 18-21, 2016 Enhancing utilitarian cycling: a case study Helena Strömberg a, I.C. MariAnne Karlsson a,* aDesign & Human Factors, Product and Production Development, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Göteborg, Sweden Abstract An increase in utilitarian cycling could have many benefits for society as well as the individual. Today, cycling is however used for only a small share of everyday trips. Several studies have identified factors that facilitate or hinder an increase in everyday cycling (e.g. built environment; weather; attitudes) but one factor missing from this list is the bicycle per se and its effect on the willingness to cycle. The paper presents the results of an interview study with participants (Ps) of a field trial where they promised to replace three days worth of car journeys with bicycling. Main questions posed were: how did the Ps in the field trial experience trying to shift their transport behaviours? and what role did the bicycle designs play in the attempt to shift travel behaviour? An assumption behind the project was that the present development of bicycles and accessories was an interesting entry point to increase utilitarian bicycling with potential to replace car use to a higher degree for a wider target group than ordinary bicycles. Ps were therefore guided regarding the choice of bicycle, i.e. they had to specify their needs in relation to bicycle design based on which trips they intended to use the bicycle for, and other everyday factors that could influence how and for what they would use a bicycle.
    [Show full text]
  • COOS BAY Transportation System Plan
    CITY OF COOS BAY Transportation System Plan VOLUME 1 August 2020 CITY OF COOS BAY Transportation System Plan Volume 1 Prepared for City of Coos Bay Coos Bay, Oregon Prepared by David Evans and Associates, Inc. 2100 SW River Parkway Portland, Oregon 97201 AUGUST 2020 C O O S B A Y TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN • 2020- 2040 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT TEAM City of Coos Bay Jim Hossley, Public Works Director Carolyn Johnson, Community Development Administrator Randy Dixon, Operations Administrator Jennifer Wirsing, City Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Virginia Elandt, Senior Planner David Evans and Associates, Inc. Angela Rogge, PE, Project Manager Andrew Mortensen, Senior Planner Dana Shuff, EIT Justin Kuenne, EIT Angelo Planning Group Darci Rudzinski, AICP, Principal Shayna Rehberg, AICP, Senior Planner Courtney Simms, Assistant Planner Civil West Engineering Will Dawson, QSP, South Coast Regional Manager Sean Lloyd, PE Public Advisory Committee (PAC) Andrew Gordon Diana Schab Jim Berg Sergio Gamino Tom Burdett Jeff Stump Dick Leshley Pamela Barlow-Lind Phil Marler Fauna Larkin Rex Miller Jamie Fereday Rick Skinner John Whittey Jennifer Groth John Knutson Larry Becker Bruce Martin C O O S B A Y TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN • 2020- 2040 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background and Process ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Center of Excellence First-Year Progress Report
    Center of Excellence First-Year Progress Report Project Number: COE-2012-01 Project Title: METROFREIGHT: the Local/Global Challenge of Urban Freight Name and Affiliation of Main Applicant(s): METRANS Transportation Center Sol Price School of Public Policy University of Southern California 650 Childs Way, RGL 238 Los Angeles, CA 90089-0626 Time period that this report covers: March 2013 – December 2013 Starting date of the project: March 1, 2013 Expected end date of the project: December 31, 2017 Received Funding for Year 1: US $324,750 SEK 2,131,253 Requested Funding for Year 2: US $673,700 SEK 4,421,325 Date and signature of main applicants: _________________________________ ____12-3-13_________________ Genevieve Giuliano, Director Date METROFREIGHT Year 1 Report Page 1 Project Description Project Activities The main tasks for Year 1 were 1) setting up the center, 2) Phase 1 research, freight flows and their impacts, 3) curriculum guide and course development, 4) outreach. Setting up organization and administration of the Center The launch of METROFREIGHT began with a kick-off meeting with VREF sponsors in Gothenburg at the end of February 2013. The contract processing took quite some time, with the master contract set up in May 2013, and the subcontracts being issued after the master contract was in place. The last of the subcontracts was finalized in September 2013. The long contracting process delayed the start of the major work of Year 1. Setting up the center involves hiring staff, establishing a communications structure, and establishing mechanisms for collaborative work across three countries and four time zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecomobility Alliance 2017 Report
    Photo: Itzel Obregón 2016 2016 Itzel Obregón Photo: City of Kaohsiung EcoMobility Alliance Report 2016-2017 ecomobility.org i www. ecomobility.org ECOMOBILITY ALLIANCE 2016-2017 3 FOREWORDS ABOUT THE ECOMOBILITY 5 ALLIANCE ALLIANCE 6 ACHIEVEMENTS CONTENT ALLIANCE 8 PARTNERS WORKSHOPS AND 9 EVENTS • EcoMobility Congresses • EcoMobility World Festivals • Declarations and prostocols PROJECTS: ECOMOBILITY 15 SHIFT 17 PUBLICATIONS ECOMOBILITY ALLIANCE CITY 19 PROFILES 20. Almada, Portugal 21. Belo Horizonte, Brazil 22. Bogotá, Colombia 23. Boulder, USA 24. Buenos Aires, Argentina 25. Burgas, Bulgaria 26. Changwon, South Korea 27. Curitiba, Brazil COMING UP IN THE 28. Freiburg, Germany 42 ALLIANCE 29. Kaohsiung 30. Kochi, India 31. Leipzig, Germany 32. Medellin, Colombia 33. Mexico City, Mexico THEMATIC WORKING 34. Münster, Germany 43 GROUPS 35. Portland, USA 36. Quito, Ecuador 37. Rosario, Argentina 38. San Miguel de Allende, Mexico 39. Shimla, India 40. Suwon, South Korea 41. Sydney, Australia ii FOREWORDS Dear EcoMobility Alliance cities and colleagues, the City of Kaohsiung is proud to present the following EcoMobility Alliance Report. As Chair of the EcoMobility Alliance for the past two years, it has been an honor to lead this exciting period of advancement in sustainable transport globally. Our network of cities and partners has grown and progress has been made towards building sustainable mobility paradigms with efficient transport systems that are innovative, intelligent, inclusive, safe and clean. This report focuses on the efforts that have been made by the City of Kaohsiung along with EcoMobility Alliance Cities and partners to create and implement urban mobility strategies that prioritize people and the environment. Cities have a responsibility to create public policies and action plans that benefit residents by improving transportation options and incentivizing alternative modes of transport that promote sustainable mobility.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcomers Guide for Personnel Assigned to NATO MLO Belgrade Is Authored and Maintained by the Personnel of MLO
    December 2017 NATO MILITARY LIAISON NEWCOMERS OFFICE 5 BIRČANINOVA STREET GUIDE 11 000 BELGRADE Serbia January 2018 NATO MLO BELGRADE Birčaninova 5 – Serbian MoD building Tel: +381 11 362 86 70 Fax: 00381 11 334 70 34 ARRIVALS GUIDE FOR NATO PERSONNEL The Newcomers guide for Personnel assigned to NATO MLO Belgrade is authored and maintained by the personnel of MLO. The objective of this guide is to assist new MLO members and their families during the relocation process and after arrival, by giving an overview of the procedures upon arrival and some basic information about the city and the office, to help you get started. The Arrivals and Staff Guide is not intended to provide a complete analysis of the subjects and was not written by legal experts. It is assembled through daily practice. The information is believed accurate as of the date of this guide, but is subject to change. Please suggest any sort of corrections and ammendments to this Guide. We look forward to meeting you! 1 NATO MLO Belgrade welcomes you! A word from our Chief: Welcome to the NATO Military Liaison Office in Belgrade. I hope that you find your stay in Belgrade rewarding and enjoyable and this Guide useful. You are now a member of NATO MLO BE and it is my job to support you throughout your time here. Arriving at any new job can be a daunting experience. Inevitably, there are a few administration and organization hoops to jump through in your first month or so and we will help you through these.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Massachusetts Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd
    Collection: SC-0369 University Archives and Special Collections Joseph P. Healey Library University of Massachusetts Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd. Boston, Massachusetts 02125 [email protected] BICYCLE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION RECORDS 1816-2006, bulk 1880-1997 Accession Number: 120-003, 120-021 Repository: University of Massachusetts Boston. University Archives and Special Collections Creator: Bicycle Manufacturers Association Title: Bicycle Manufacturers Association records Date [inclusive]: 1816-2006, bulk 1880-1997 Extent: 12 linear feet (four record cartons, five document cases, one legal size document case, one half document case, one newspaper box, one scrapbook, one film reel, .25 linear feet of books, and six oversize folders) Name of Creator: These materials include records of this same body under its earlier name, Bicycle Institute of America (name changed in 1975). Language: English Citation: Courtesy of the University Archives and Special Collections Department, Joseph P. Healey Library, University of Massachusetts Boston: Bicycle Manufacturers Association records Processing Information: Processed by Meghan Bailey in February 2020. Conditions on Use and Access: This collection is open for research. Copyright: Copyright restrictions may apply. PROVENANCE William Wilkinson donated the records of the Bicycle Manufacturers Association to University Archives and Special Collections in the Joseph P. Healey Library at the University of Massachusetts Boston on September 22, 2015. PROCESSING NOTES The records for the Bicycle Manufacturers Association had no original order and were culled from Wilkinson’s donations of records of other organizations with which he was involved. Original folder titles were retained. Folder titles created by the processor and information added to original folder titles are indicated by brackets in the folder list.
    [Show full text]
  • Delius Klasing Verlag Bielefeld ✉Delius Klasing Verlag Hamburg Siekerwall 21 ABC-Straße 21 33602 Bielefeld 20354 Hamburg
    CYCLING Delius Klasing Verlag Delius Klasing Verlag Marlene Sturm Anita Dutta-Keane ABC-Straße 21 Siekerwall 21 D-20354 Hamburg D-33602 Bielefeld Phone +49 40 33966 731 Phone +49 521 559 206 Fax +49 40 33966 777 Fax +49 521 559 205 [email protected] [email protected] E-BIKE Delius Klasing Verlag Delius Klasing Verlag Marlene Sturm Anita Dutta-Keane ABC-Straße 21 Siekerwall 21 D-20354 Hamburg D-33602 Bielefeld Phone +49 40 33966 731 Phone +49 521 559 206 Fax +49 40 33966 777 Fax +49 521 559 205 [email protected] [email protected] Martin Häußermann E-Bike 2020 176 pages Which e-bike is right for me? 210 x 280 mm Flexi cover Whether as a city bike, mountain bike, racing bike or cargo 15,00 (D) bike - e-bikes play an increasingly important role in Planned publication date everyday life and leisure. The e-bike specialist Martin April 2020 Häußermann has compiled all the important information you need to find the right model for you and not lose your bearings in the confusing market. This book provides answers to all the questions that those interested in buying or pedelec owners ask themselves. The journalist introduces the different types and their technology, informs about the correct handling of wheel, motor and batteries and names quality features. All technical facts are explained in clear language and The journalist and photographer Martin Häußermann is co- experts have their say. Tips and tricks for driving safety founder of the bicycle magazine Fahrstil and works for the should not be missing so that the bikers are on the road FAZ, Motor Presse Stuttgart and BikeBild.
    [Show full text]
  • Potentials of Electric Vehicles in Innovative City-Logistics: a Case Study from Karlsruhe, Germany
    33rd Electric Vehicle Symposium (EVS33) Portland, Oregon, June 14 - 17, 2020 Potentials of electric vehicles in innovative city-logistics: A case study from Karlsruhe, Germany Cornelius Moll1,2, Saskia Franz1 1Fraunhofer-Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Breslauer Str. 48, 76139 Karlsruhe, Germany, [email protected] 2University of Hohenheim, Chair for Service Management and Service Markets, Schloss Hohenheim 1, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany Summary Urban traffic is increasing, resulting in congestions, air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. One option to reduce urban traffic and its impacts are innovative city logistics concepts (CLC) in combination with battery electric vehicles (BEV). However, logistics service providers (LSP) are reluctant to implement CLCs or BEVs due to little knowledge on the potential economic and ecological benefits. Thus, our aim is to explore the acceptance of CLCs and BEVs among LSPs and to analyze the economic and ecological benefits of such concepts and how BEVs contribute to potential benefits. Using expert interviews as well as techno-economic and ecological analysis, we find that BEVs show the highest acceptance among LSPs, followed by city-hubs, micro- hubs with electric freight bikes on the last mile and night-time delivery. We also find that micro-hubs improve the economic and ecological performance of logistics operations, while night-time delivery shows no benefits. BEVs turn out to be more expensive for both CLCs but clearly improve the ecological performance. Keywords: freight transport, city traffic, mobility concepts, BEV (battery electric vehicle), pollution 1 Introduction Urbanization, economic growth and structural economic changes such as globalization, increasing world trade or e-commerce lead to increasing road transportation, especially in urban areas [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Bicycles And/Or Cargo Vans? New Algorithms Provide the Answers
    Press release, April 1, 2017 Freight bicycles and/or cargo vans? New algorithms provide the answers Many urban planners are pinning high hopes on the freight bicycle as one of the key means of urban transportation in the future. Some pioneering initiatives have started to bring these cargo bikes to the streets in Vienna. Up to now, however, it has been unclear which logistics solutions are best suited to individual cities and which role freight bicycles play in these approaches. One of the main problems is how to best synchronize trucks and freight bicycles in bimodal logistics. Now the work of Assistant Professor Vera Hemmelmayr from WU’s Institute for Transport and Logistics Management provides answers to this problem for the first time. Together with her colleagues Alexandra Anderluh (WU) and Pamela Nolz (AIT), Vera Hemmelmayr has developed an algorithm designed to tackle these challenges. As of 2017, over half of the world’s population lives in cities, and this figure is growing: According to OECD estimates, by the year 2100, this number will rise to approximately 85%. The metropolitan areas of the future will require efficient and environmentally friendly logistics. This is why Assistant Professor Vera Hemmelmayr from WU’s Institute for Transport and Logistics Management is doing research on sustainable logistics solutions for freight transportation in urban areas. She is not only looking for the best routing solutions but also at the negative effects of freight transportation on safety, the environment, and traffic. WU researcher Vera Hemmelmayr’s field of expertise is known as city logistics. She is developing special algorithms, called metaheuristics, which can be used to identify logistics scenarios in urban areas and develop appropriate solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Turbine Machines Are Applicable for Speeding and Flying Objects
    APPLICABILITY AND COMPATIBLE. [1905] Turbine machines are applicable for speeding and flying objects, vehicles and machines for generating electric current and for propulsion of the electric vehicle, vessels or craft. Unlike stationary turbine machines the machines mounted on a speeding object generates electric current for the vehicle electric supply. While the vehicle moving through the ambient air or water is the generator of friction around the object forcing itself through matter. Whereby friction of wind is obtained for driving the turbine oriented in the head wind direction or ducting the flow of fluid to the turbine machine. A marine vessel speeding on the body of water has the advantage to utilize both flowing matter of water and wind when speeding. motorized and non-motorized vehicles speeding and flying objects, vehicles, crafts. Applicable for vessels speeding on a body of water and vessels submerged in the body of water. [1906] The inventions are Applicable for, Vehicle – non-living means of transportation provided with the inventions. Vehicles are most often man-made, although some other means of transportation. Know the comprehensive flow of mixed heterogenous traffic from paddled vehicles, pushed subjects on wheels to flying objects worn as a suite. Examples include icebergs and floating tree trunks. A list of vehicles is given beneath. Aero Sani, Airship. All-terrain vehicle. Amphibious all-terrain vehicle. Amphibious vehicle. Autogiros. Automobile. Auto rickshaw. Balloon. Bathyscaphe. Bicycle. Blimp. Boat. Bus. Cable car. Catamaran. Canoe. (Coach (bus). Coach carriage). Cycle rickshaw. Dandy horse. Deep Submergence Vehicle. Diving bell. Diving chamber. Dog sled. Draisine. Electric vehicle. Fixed-wing aircraft.
    [Show full text]