2019 Facilities Engineering Seminar 4/24/2019 - 4/26/2019 JACKSONVILLE, FL
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Port of Prince Rupert Delivers Another Record Year
Port of Prince Rupert Delivers Another Record Year rupertport.com The Prince Rupert Port Authority (PRPA) announced today another record year in volume. A grand total of 29.9 million tonnes of cargo moved through the Port of Prince Rupert in 2019 – 12% more than the 26.7 million tonnes handled the previous year and the highest total volume to date for the Port. Supporting the overall positive trend was strong Follow the BCMEA performance at DP World’s Fairview Container Terminal with over 1.2 million TEUs at an increase on social media of 17% over 2018, the addition of propane volume through AltaGas’ Ridley Island Propane Export Terminal, and growth in coal handled at Ridley Terminal where cargo levels were up 18% over the previous year. (continued) We’re looking for your good news stories to share! Please submit to Grace Sullivan: [email protected] 500 – 349 Railway Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6A 1A4 604.688.1155 www.bcmea.com January 16, 2020 The BCMEA Bulletin January 16, 2020 Port of Prince Rupert Delivers Another Record Year (continued) Northland Cruise Terminal also saw a year-over-year increase in passenger volumes of 35%, totalling over 12,400 visitors to Prince Rupert through cruise travel. “The Port of Prince Rupert’s consistent record-breaking annual volumes confirms the Port’s growing role in Canadian trade,” said Shaun Stevenson, President and CEO of the Prince Rupert Port Authority. “The Port of Prince Rupert has a reputation for offering strategic advantages to shippers. The 2019 volumes illustrate the growing market demand for the Prince Rupert gateway and further validates our plans for growth and expansion over the next several years.” PRPA’s latest economic impact study released in 2019 revealed that port-related growth has resulted in the Port of Prince Rupert handling approximately $50 billion in trade value annually and supports an estimated 3,600 direct supply-chain jobs in northern BC, $310 million in annual wages, and $125.5 million in annual government revenue. -
Telenet Communications Corp
The user's role in connecting to a value added network Early next year data will start flowing at 56,000 bits a second over the circuits of a unique nationwide common carrier service Richard B. Hovey called a value added network. This new approach Telenet Communications Corp. to data communications combines old and new Washington, D.C. transmission facilities and adds to them a form of intelligence to improve the performance. The value added network (VAN) is different from present data transmission services and from private data networks in both the enhanced and extensive offerings to users and the sophisticated technology it employs. The technology, called packet switching, makes it possible for the value added carrier—the implementer and operator of the VAN—to provide any user, large or small, with the kind of fast-response, error-free, low-cost-per- transaction data transmissions now available only to companies that have invested in their own large private networks. In essence, the value added carrier (VAC) takes advantage of the substantial economies of scale re- sulting from one very large network— fully utiliz- ing such expensive resources as transmission lines and concentration equipment by sharing the net- work among the VAN'S subscribers. The VAC passes on a portion of the consequent savings to the indi- vidual user-subscribers through a tariff charge based mainly on traffic volume. Beyond the simple economics, leasing existing communications facilities allows the carrier to ob- tain just as much transmission capacity for each lo- cation as is required by the traffic load. This pro- vides the flexibility to adapt quickly to subscriber traffic and geographical demands, and permits the incorporation of new transmission offerings—such as satellites and AT&T'S Dataphone Digital Service- as they become available. -
Chapter 5: Freight Rail
Chapter 5: Freight Rail Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Wisconsin’s Rail Freight Network ............................................................................................................. 3 History of freight rail in Wisconsin ........................................................................................................ 3 WisDOT’s response to changes in statewide freight rail service .......................................................... 4 Milwaukee Road ................................................................................................................................... 4 Rail Transit Commissions ...................................................................................................................... 4 Wisconsin’s current freight rail network .............................................................................................. 5 Freight rail classifications ...................................................................................................................... 5 Commodities moved ............................................................................................................................. 6 2030 freight shipments forecast ........................................................................................................... 8 Wisconsin’s intermodal facilities ....................................................................................................... -
Eastern Canada Ports Battle for Mega-Ship Calls Peter Ford, Principal, Skyrock Advisors, LLC, and Dr
Analysis: Eastern Canada ports battle for mega-ship calls Peter Ford, principal, SkyRock Advisors, LLC, and Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, professor of global studies & geography, Hofstra University May 23, 2018 3:59PM EDT The Port of Montreal is the largest on Canada's east coast. [Photo credit: Port of Montreal.] Every new terminal or port development has risks, particularly in a mature market with established stakeholders. The risk can be mitigated if container volumes have a pronounced upward trend, but the financial crisis of 2007-2008 has shifted growth expectations closer to the range of 2 to 3 percent annual growth rate at the global level, but around 5 percent for the North American East Coast. Still, these figures are subject to caution considering growing trade contentions as well as technological changes in global manufacturing and supply chains with the outsourcing and offshoring model being reconsidered. Ocean carriers have responded to this environment by unprecedented industry consolidation, with more merger and acquisition activity happening in the last three years than in the decade preceding, and then further consolidating into mega-alliances with lines focusing on larger vessels to create scale economies and reduce slot costs. Many shipping lines are also involved in container terminal operations with various concession and ownership schemes. 1. All is not quiet on the East Coast front The Canadian East Coast has been a very stable market in the last 50 years with established ports, mainly Montreal and Halifax, assuming dominance. While Montreal experienced a growth relatively on par with the US East Coast, the volumes handled by Halifax barely changed in the last 20 years but have recently shown sign of upward momentum due to new services. -
Connecting You to Your Markets
CN's Rail Bypass Around Chicago We've been connecting our customers to their markets faster for years. Along with our streamlined interchange points, we offer a truly efficient supply chain advantage. CONNECTING YOU to Vancouver and Prince Rupert TO YOUR MARKETS Lake Michigan Through our Chicago Intermodal Hub to the U.S. Midwest CHICAGO CN’s bypass rail line to Toronto and the east to Decatur and coast ports of Montreal, Indianapolis Halifax and Saint John to Memphis and the Gulf ports of Mobile and New Orleans CUSTOMER SERVICE One point of contact for all your supply chain needs. OUR GREEN PROMISE CN Rail is energy efficient. We are committed to environmental initiatives that make us the best choice for greener shipping. CN SALES | 1-888-668-4626 | [email protected] | cn.ca CN012020 Port of Prince Rupert Port of Vancouver Port of Halifax Port of The superior network solution Montreal Toronto NY/NJ for all your supply chain logistics Chicago Philadelphia CN provides a one-stop shop, including freight forwarding to Wilmington move your product along the best supply chain routes. Through our partnerships with ocean carriers and major Canadian port gateways, we offer a single line seamless service from last port of call in Asia to Chicago in only 16 days. Port of Mobile Port of New Orleans • 23 intermodal terminals across North America PORT OF PORT OF PORT OF PORT OF PORT OF PORT OF TRANSIT TIME Prince Rupert Vancouver Montreal Halifax New Orleans Mobile • Network reach to 3 coasts serving multiple TORONTO 5th am 5th am same day pm 2nd am 3rd pm 3rd pm Canadian and U.S. -
The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet
The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 02:49:54 UTC Contents Articles History of the Internet 1 Barry Appelman 26 Paul Baran 28 Vint Cerf 33 Danny Cohen (engineer) 41 David D. Clark 44 Steve Crocker 45 Donald Davies 47 Douglas Engelbart 49 Charles M. Herzfeld 56 Internet Engineering Task Force 58 Bob Kahn 61 Peter T. Kirstein 65 Leonard Kleinrock 66 John Klensin 70 J. C. R. Licklider 71 Jon Postel 77 Louis Pouzin 80 Lawrence Roberts (scientist) 81 John Romkey 84 Ivan Sutherland 85 Robert Taylor (computer scientist) 89 Ray Tomlinson 92 Oleg Vishnepolsky 94 Phil Zimmermann 96 References Article Sources and Contributors 99 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 102 Article Licenses License 103 History of the Internet 1 History of the Internet The history of the Internet began with the development of electronic computers in the 1950s. This began with point-to-point communication between mainframe computers and terminals, expanded to point-to-point connections between computers and then early research into packet switching. Packet switched networks such as ARPANET, Mark I at NPL in the UK, CYCLADES, Merit Network, Tymnet, and Telenet, were developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s using a variety of protocols. The ARPANET in particular led to the development of protocols for internetworking, where multiple separate networks could be joined together into a network of networks. In 1982 the Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP) was standardized and the concept of a world-wide network of fully interconnected TCP/IP networks called the Internet was introduced. -
Study of U.S. Inland Containerized Cargo Moving Through Canadian and Mexican Seaports
Study of U.S. Inland Containerized Cargo Moving Through Canadian and Mexican Seaports July 2012 Committee for the Study of U.S. Inland Containerized Cargo Moving Through Canadian and Mexican Seaports Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. - Chairman Lowry A. Crook - Former Chief of Staff Ronald Murphy - Managing Director Rebecca Fenneman - General Counsel Olubukola Akande-Elemoso - Office of the Chairman Lauren Engel - Office of the General Counsel Michael Gordon - Office of the Managing Director Jason Guthrie - Office of Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services Gary Kardian - Bureau of Trade Analysis Dr. Roy Pearson - Bureau of Trade Analysis Paul Schofield - Office of the General Counsel Matthew Drenan - Summer Law Clerk Jewel Jennings-Wright - Summer Law Clerk Foreword Thirty years ago, U.S. East Coast port officials watched in wonder as containerized cargo sitting on their piers was taken away by trucks to the Port of Montreal for export. At that time, I concluded in a law review article that this diversion of container cargo was legal under Federal Maritime Commission law and regulation, but would continue to be unresolved until a solution on this cross-border traffic was reached: “Contiguous nations that are engaged in international trade in the age of containerization can compete for cargo on equal footings and ensure that their national interests, laws, public policy and economic health keep pace with technological innovations.” [Emphasis Added] The mark of a successful port is competition. Sufficient berths, state-of-the-art cranes, efficient handling, adequate acreage, easy rail and road connections, and sophisticated logistical programs facilitating transportation to hinterland destinations are all tools in the daily cargo contest. -
Revisiting Port Capacity: a Practical Method for Investment and Policy Decisions
Revisiting Port Capacity: A practical method for Investment and Policy decisions Ioannis N. Lagoudis Head of R&D, XRTC Ltd, Business Consultants 95 Akti Miaouli Str., 18538, Piraeus, Greece & Adjunct Faculty, University of the Aegean – Department of Shipping trade and Transport 2A Korai Str., 82100, Chios, Greece and James B. Rice, Jr. Deputy Director, MIT – Center for Transportation and Logistics 1 Amherst Street, Second Floor,Cambridge, MA 02142 Abstract The paper revisits port capacity providing a more holistic approach via including immediate port connections from the seaside and the hinterland. The methodology provided adopts a systemic approach encapsulating the different port terminals along with the seaside and hinterland connections providing a holistic estimation of port capacity. Capacity is defined with the use of two dimensions; static and dynamic. Static capacity relates to land availability or in other words the available space for use. Dynamic capacity is determined by the available technology of equipment in combination to the skill of available labor. With the presentation of a case study from a container terminal the practical use of this methodology is illustrated. Based on the data provided by the terminal operator the results showed that there is still available space to be utilised at a static level and also room more improvement at a dynamic level. The benefits stemming from the above methodology are multidimensional with the key ones being the flexible framework adjusted to the needs of each port system for measuring capacity, the productivity estimation of the different business processes involved in the movement of goods and people and the evaluation of the financial performance of the different business units and the port as a whole. -
Abbate Ch1-2
6 Introductum Wide Web are prominent examples of informally created applications that became popular, not as the result of some central agency's mar Heat and ,-,UIH..4< keting plan, but through the spontaneous decisions of thousands of a.ndMeanings of Hacket(Switching independent users. In reconstructing the history of the Internet, I have been struck time and again by. the unexpected twists and turns its development has taken. Often a well-laid plan was abandoned after a short time and replaced by a new approach from an unexpected quarter..Rapid advances, such as the introduction of personal computers and the invention of local-area networks, continually threatened to make existing network technologies obsolete. In addition, responsibility for operating the Internet changed hands several times over the course Of all the ARPANET's technical innovations, perhaps the most cele of its first thirty years or so. How, in the face of all this change and brated was packet switching. Packet switching was an experimental, uncertainty, did the system survive and even flourish? I believe that even controversial method for transmitting data across a network. Its the key to the Internet's success was a commitment to flexibility and proponents claimed that it would increase the efficiency, reliability, and diversity, both in technical design and in organizational culture. No speed of data communications, butit was also quite complex to imple one could predict the specific changes that would revolutionize the ment, and some communications experts argued that the technique computing and communications industries at the end of the twentieth would never work. -
From the Port of Prince Rupert to the Review Panel Re: Written Submission for the Milton Logistics Hub Project Hearing
PR I NCE RUPERT PORT AUTHORITY UNKI NG A WORLD OF OPPORTUNITY May 24,2019 Ms. Lesley Griffiths, Panel Chair c/o CEAA 160 Elgin Street Ottawa, ON K1AOH3 Dear Ms. Griffiths: We are writing to express our support for CN's plans to build the Milton Logistics Hub. The Port of Prince Rupert is a Canadian gateway for intermodal imports and exports to the Asia Pacific and is serviced exclusively by CN's rail network. The proposed Milton Logistics Hub· represents the supply chain infrastructure that is vital to ensure the fluidity of goods between markets. The Greater Toronto Hamilton Area (GTHA) is nearing capacity in terms of existing intermodal facilities. CN's $250 million investment will significantly improve the capacity, velocity, reliability and market reach for shippers in the Ontario market. Container volumes destined for CN's Brampton intermodal yard through Prince Rupert have grown 72.5% from 61,041 twenty-foot equivalents (TEUs) in 2015 to 105,290 TEUs in 2018. As Prince Rupert's Fairview Container Terminal moves through its next expansion to increase capacity to 1.8 million TEUs by 2022, Canada requires corresponding expansions of inland terminal capacity in order to accommodate growth in container volumes. The Milton intermodal terminal will provide the growing region of southern Ontario with much needed inland terminal capacity to support containerized imports of consumer products, auto parts, electronics and retail goods. Exporters of food and agricultural products, equipment, machinery, chemicals and metals from across the GTHA will also benefit from additional terminal capacity. Congestion at the Brampton intermodal yard has an impact on the terminal dwell time of containers bound for Toronto. -
Freight Preclearance – Gauthier
Beyond the Border Action Plan Integrated Cargo Security Strategy Prince Rupert Rail Pilot Gérald Gauthier, April 2016 1 RAC –Who we are Safety• 55 members Culture Measurement Tool • Represents virtually all railways operating in Canada today: • Class 1s (CN, CPR and US Class 1s) – private • Short lines – private • Inter-city Passenger (VIA/AMTRAK) – public • Commuter – public • Tourist – private & public Provides railway industry with unique opportunities and service capability Canadian Railways – 2014 Commodity Mix 3 Canadian Railways – Market Reach 4 Beyond the Border Rail • CN rail pilot with CBP and CBSA developed to push high risk security concerns related to import cargo to the North American perimeter • Borne from the February 2011 US-Canada “Beyond the Border Action Plan” - a shared vision for perimeter security and economic competitiveness • CN’s rail corridor from Prince Rupert BC to International Falls MN was selected for the pilot after careful review of risks and feasibility by CBP/DHS, CBSA, Transport Canada, and Industry Canada • Focus of the pilot on import containers from the pacific rim, discharged from vessel at the port of Prince Rupert BC for US destinations • “Cleared Once – Accepted Twice” to reduce level of CBP inspection at US border 5 CN Route 6 The Electronic Process • Pilot facilitated by sophisticated electronic processing between trade partners and government agencies • Canadian rail carriers developed full cycle EDI processing with the US and Canada customs agencies in 1995 and carried through to CBP’s ACE -
The Telenetreport
The Telenet Report JL ® " Telenet Communications Corporation, 1050 17th St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. (202)637-7900 Volume 3, Number 1, February 1976 Profile of TelenetSubscribers: Wide Range of Computer Systems Sign Onto Telenet's Public Network Who is a typical Telenet subscriber? tions. Some have extensive networks graphic databases which theircustomers What kind of computer system does he which currently operate in parallel with may access through Telenet. Lockheed's have and how is he using public packet Telenet's, while others utilize no other Dialog" service, for example, permits switching service? network facilities. There are hosts con- searching files containing millions of ab- Thelogical mapof the network on page nected to the network by means of a stracts of technical, educa- 2 shows the particular host computers singleasynchronous communication tional, social, agricultural and business that have been connected to the Telenet line, or multiple asynchronous direct literature and retrieving selected items. network in our first six months of opera- channels into a Telenet Access Con- SUNY's biomedical information retrieval tion. Several dozen additional hosts are traileron theirpremises. There are other scheduled for service during the first hosts that are connected by means of quarterof 1976, and network expansion synchronous communication lines em- both within Telenet Central Offices and ploying powerful network access proto- into new cities is also underway. cols. Most Telenet subscribersare using the Most subscribers made no changesto network to provide remote terminal their systems when connecting to the access to their host computer, but the network, while others either installed range of systems and applications are Telenet-furnished network interface soft- diverse.