Astragalus Anisus ME Jones
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Astragalus anisus M.E. Jones (Gunnison milkvetch): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project April 21, 2004 Karin Decker and David G. Anderson Colorado Natural Heritage Program 8002 Campus Delivery — Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Decker, K. and D.G. Anderson. (2004, April 21). Astragalus anisus M.E. Jones (Gunnison milkvetch): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http:// www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/astragalusanisus.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work benefited greatly from the helpfulness and generosity of many experts in the Gunnison area, particularly Gay Austin, Dr. Robin Bingham, Joe Capodice, Lynn Cudlip, and Dr. Barry Johnston. April Wasson generously provided data, copies of reports, and answers to many questions, and our knowledge of Astragalus anisus would be much less without her contributions. Nan Lederer at University of Colorado Museum Herbarium, Michael Denslow at Rancho Santa Ana-Pomona Herbarium, and Jennifer Ackerfield at the CSU Herbarium provided helpful information on A. anisus specimens. Susan Spackman Panjabi helped to acquire and locate additional specimen labels. Sabrina Chartier assisted with literature acquisition and scanning images. AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES Karin Decker is an ecologist with the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP). She works with CHNP’s Ecology and Botany teams, providing ecological, statistical, GIS, and computing expertise for a variety of projects. She has worked with CNHP since 2000. Prior to this, she was an ecologist with the Colorado Natural Areas Program in Denver for four years. She is a Colorado native who has been working in the field of ecology since 1990, including four summers at the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory in Gothic, Colorado. Before returning to school to become an ecologist she graduated from the University of Northern Colorado with B.A. in Music (1982). She received an M.S. in Ecology from the University of Nebraska (1997). David G. Anderson is a botanist with the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP). Mr. Anderson’s work at CNHP includes inventory and mapping of rare plants throughout Colorado, mapping weeds, maintaining and updating CNHP’s database, and writing reports on the rare plants of Colorado. He has worked with CNHP since 1999. Much of Mr. Anderson’s prior experience comes from five years of fieldwork studying the flora and ecosystem processes of the Alaskan and Canadian Arctic. Mr. Anderson also served in the Peace Corps as a science teacher in the Solomon Islands from 1996 to 1998. Mr. Anderson received his B.A. in Environmental, Populational, and Organismic Biology from the University of Colorado, Boulder (1991) and his M.S. in Botany from the University of Washington, Seattle (1996). COVER PHOTO CREDIT Astragalus anisus (Gunnison milkvetch). Photograph by Barry Johnston. Used with his permission. 2 3 SUMMARY OF KEY COMPONENTS FOR CONSERVATION OF ASTRAGALUS ANISUS Status Astragalus anisus (Gunnison milkvetch) is a local endemic whose global distribution is limited to the upper Gunnison Basin in Gunnison County, Colorado. About 75 percent of the documented occurrences are on federal lands, but only 10 to 15 percent are on USDA Forest Service (USFS) land of the Gunnison National Forest. This species is fairly common within the basin, and the population numbers are thought to be stable. However, due to its small global distribution, NatureServe and the Colorado Natural Heritage Program rank this species as G2S2 (imperiled because of rarity or other factors). The Rocky Mountain Region (Region 2) of the USFS does not currently list A. anisus as a sensitive species although it was listed as such prior to November 2003. Astragalus anisus is included on the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado State Sensitive Species List in the Gunnison Field Office. It is not listed as threatened or endangered on the Federal Endangered Species List (ESA of 1973, U.S.C. 1531-1536, 1538-1540). Primary Threats Although Astragalus anisus is locally common and appears to have a stable population, its entire global range is contained within the upper Gunnison Basin. Additive effects of threats to the population may be compounded by this restricted range. Based on the available information, there are several tangible threats to A. anisus. In order of decreasing priority, these are road building, off-road vehicle use, non-motorized recreation, non-native species invasion, grazing, residential development, fire suppression, resource extraction, and global climate change. A lack of systematic tracking of population trends and conditions and a lack of knowledge about the species’ basic life cycle also contribute to the possibility that one or more of these factors will threaten its long-term persistence. Primary Conservation Elements, Management Implications and Considerations Habitat and populations of Astragalus anisus in the upper Gunnison Basin are primarily on public lands. Documented occurrences include nine sites on USFS lands of the Gunnison National Forest, and 64 sites on BLM holdings of the Gunnison Field Office. Consequently, public land managers are in the best position to ensure the continued survival and persistence of this species. Efforts by USFS and BLM personnel to perform basic population monitoring and to maintain a basin-wide awareness and interest in A. anisus will contribute greatly to the knowledge and preservation of the species. This level of awareness should contribute to ensuring that management actions do not adversely affect the species’ persistence. 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................................................2 AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES .........................................................................................................................................2 COVER PHOTO CREDIT .............................................................................................................................................2 SUMMARY OF KEY COMPONENTS FOR CONSERVATION OF ASTRAGALUS ANISUS....................................3 Status..........................................................................................................................................................................3 Primary Threats..........................................................................................................................................................3 Primary Conservation Elements, Management Implications and Considerations.....................................................3 TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ...............................................................................................................................6 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................................7 Goal of assessment.....................................................................................................................................................7 Scope of Assessment..................................................................................................................................................7 Treatment of uncertainty in assessment .....................................................................................................................7 Treatment of this document as a web publication......................................................................................................8 Peer review of this document.....................................................................................................................................8 MANAGEMENT STATUS AND NATURAL HISTORY .............................................................................................8 Management Status ....................................................................................................................................................8 Existing Regulatory Mechanisms, Management Plans, and Conservation Strategies.............................................10 Adequacy of current laws and regulations ..........................................................................................................10 Adequacy of current enforcement of laws and regulations.................................................................................11 Biology and Ecology ...............................................................................................................................................11 Classification and description..............................................................................................................................11 History of knowledge .....................................................................................................................................12 Description .....................................................................................................................................................13 Published descriptions and other sources.......................................................................................................13