DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Dilarang mereproduksi atau memperbanyak seluruh atau sebagian dari buku ini dalam bentuk atau cara apa pun tanpa izin tertulis dari penerbit. © Hak cipta dilindungi oleh Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 All Rights Reserved LIPI Press © 2017 Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI) Pusat Penelitian Biologi Katalog dalam Terbitan (KDT) Temuan dan Pertelaan Jenis Baru Biota Indonesia 1967–2017: Sumbangsih LIPI untuk Sains/ Marlina Ardiyani, Dhian Dwibadra, Kartika Dewi, Mulyadi, Siti Meliah, Ibnu Maryanto, Himmah Rustiami, Deby Arifiani, Joeni Setijo Rahajoe, Hari Sutrisno, dan Atit Kanti. (Penyu- sun) –Jakarta: LIPI Press, 2017. xvi hlm. + 279 hlm.; 14,8 × 21 cm ISBN 978-979-799-913-1 (cetak) 978-979-799-911-7 (e-book) 1. Pertelaan 2. Jenis baru 3. Indonesia 570 Copyeditor : Nikita Daning Pratami dan Risma Wahyu Hartiningsih Proofreader : Martinus Helmiawan dan Fadly Suhendra Penata isi : Astuti Krisnawati dan Prapti Sasiwi Desainer sampul : Meita Safitri Cetakan pertama : Oktober 2017 Diterbitkan oleh: LIPI Press, anggota Ikapi Jln. Gondangdia Lama 39, Menteng, Jakarta 10350 Telp: (021) 314 0228, 314 6942. Faks.: (021) 314 4591 E-mail: [email protected] Website: lipipress.lipi.go.id LIPI Press @lipi_press Daftar Isi Daftar Gambar ...................................................................................... vii Pengantar Penerbit ................................................................................. xi Kata Pengantar ..................................................................................... xiii Prakata ....................................................................................................xv Sumbangsih LIPI dalam Memperkaya Biota Indonesia ........................1 Daftar Jenis Flora dan Jamur yang Dipertelakan oleh Peneliti Pusat Penelitian Biologi dan Pusat Konservasi Tumbuhan Kebun Raya LIPI 1967–2017 ...............................................................................9 A. DIKOTIL .......................................................................................................9 B. MONOKOTIL ............................................................................................64 C. TUMBUHAN PAKU ................................................................................92 D. JAMUR ........................................................................................................93 Daftar Jenis Fauna yang Dipertelakan oleh Peneliti Pusat Penelitian Biologi dan Pusat Penelitian Oseanografi LIPI 1967–2017 .............103 VERTEBRATA ................................................................................................ 105 A. MAMMALIA ........................................................................................... 105 B. AVES ......................................................................................................... 121 C. AMPHIBIA .............................................................................................. 124 D. REPTILIA ................................................................................................ 130 E. CHONDRICHTYES ............................................................................... 140 F. ACTINOPTERYGII ............................................................................... 142 v INVERTEBRATA ........................................................................................... 159 A. INSECTA ................................................................................................. 159 B. ARACHNIDA ......................................................................................... 175 C. ENTOGNATHA ..................................................................................... 184 D. CRUSTACEA ........................................................................................... 186 E. MOLLUSCA ............................................................................................ 205 F. NEMATODA ........................................................................................... 207 G. POLYCHAETA ........................................................................................ 216 Daftar enisJ Mikrob yang Dipertelakan oleh Peneliti LIPI 1967–2017 .............................................................................................219 Daftar arietasV Baru oleh Peneliti LIPI 1967–2017 ..........................251 Penemuan Jenis Baru sebagai Pondasi Ilmu Pengetahuan ...............259 Daftar Pustaka .................................................................................... 261 Indeks .................................................................................................. 265 Biodata Penyusun ............................................................................... 275 vi Temuan dan Pertelaan Jenis Baru ... Daftar Gambar Gambar 1. Jumlah jenis baru flora, fauna, dan mikrob selama 50 tahun terakhir (1967–2017). ................................................6 Gambar 2. Impatiens ekapaksiana Utami, 2012 .......................................10 Gambar 3. Impatiens tribuana Utami, 2012 .............................................13 Gambar 4. Begonia semongkatensis Girm., 2016 ......................................20 Gambar 5. Begonia sumbawaensis Girm., 2016 ........................................22 Gambar 6. Trichosanthes dentifera Rugayah, 1999 ..................................25 Gambar 7. Endiandra areolata Arifiani, 2012 ........................................45 Gambar 8. Endiandra kassamensis Arifiani, 2012 ..................................48 Gambar 9. Averrhoa leucopetala Rugayah & Sunarti, 2008. ..................62 Gambar 10. Daemonorops acehensis Rustiami, 2002 .................................66 Gambar 11. Daemonorops dransfieldii Rustiami, 2002 ..............................68 Gambar 12. Bulbophyllum leucoglossum Schuit., Juswara & Droissart, 2016..............................................................................................72 Gambar 13. Dendrobium centrosepalum Schuit., Juswara & Droissart, 2016..............................................................................................73 Gambar 14. Schizostachyum purpureum Damayanto & Widjaja, 2016 ..86 Gambar 15. Schizostachyum purpureum Damayanto & Widjaja, 2016 (bagian rebung) ........................................................................87 Gambar 16. Schizostachyum purpureum Damayanto & Widjaja, 2016 (bagian buluh) . .........................................................................88 Gambar 17. Alpinia macrocrista Ardiyani & Ardi, 2015 ..........................89 vii Gambar 18. Zingiber engganoense Ardiyani, 2015 .....................................91 Gambar 19. Acaulospora walkeri Kramad. & Hedger, 1990 ....................94 Gambar 20. Marasmius coklatus Desjardin, Retnowati & E.Horak, 2000 ........................................................................97 Gambar 21. Marasmius halimunensis Desjardin, Retnowati & E.Horak, 2000 ........................................................................99 Gambar 22. Scutellospora projecturata Kramad. & Walker, 2000 ......... 101 Gambar 23. Glischropus aquilus Csorba, Görföl, Wiantoro, Kingston, Bates & Huang, 2015 (bagian kepala). ............. 107 Gambar 24. Rousettus linduensis Maryanto & Yani, 2003 ..................... 111 Gambar 25. Pteropus personatus acityae Wiantoro & Maryanto, 2016 112 Gambar 26. Dendrolagus mbaiso Flannery, Boeadi & Szalay, 1995 ..... 114 Gambar 27. Paucidentomys vermidax Esselstyn, Achmadi & Rowe, 2017 .......................................................................... 118 Gambar 28. Rattus nikenii Maryanto, Sinaga, Achmadi & Maharadatunkamsi, 2010 ...................................................... 120 Gambar 29. Melipotes carolae Beehler, Prawiradilaga, de Fretes & Kemp, 2007 ......................................................................... 122 Gambar 30. Muscicapa sodhii Harris, Rasmussen, Li Yong, Prawiradilaga, Putra, Round & Rheindt, 2014.................. 123 Gambar 31. Leptobrachium waysepuntiense Hamidy & Matsui, 2010 . 126 Gambar 32. Rhacophorus indonesiensis Hamidy & Kurniati, 2015 (sedang melakukan kopulasi). .............................................. 129 Gambar 33. Cyrtodactylus rosichonariefi Riyanto, Grismer & Wood, 2015 ........................................................................................... 135 Gambar 34. Nemacheilus tebo Hadiaty & Kottelat, 2009. ...................... 143 Gambar 35. Pangio lidi Hadiaty & Kottelat, 2009 ................................... 144 Gambar 36. Melanoatenia etnaensis Allen, Unmack, dan Hadiaty, 2016........................................................................................... 152 Gambar 37. Drosophila (Drosophila) sungaicola Suwito & Watabe, 2010........................................................................................... 164 viii Temuan dan Pertelaan Jenis Baru ... Gambar 38. Nososticta Halmahera Theischinger, Lupiyaningdyah & Richards, 2015 .................................................................170 Gambar 39. Macrocheles erniae Hartini & Takaku., 2006 .................... 179 Gambar 40. Caridina kaili Annawaty & Wowor, 2015 .......................... 188 Gambar 41. Tortanus (Atortus) indonesiensis Mulyadi, Nishida & Ohtsuka, 2017 ..................................................................... 200 Gambar 42. Tortanus (Atortus) omorii Mulyadi, Nishida & Ohtsuka, 2017 ..................................................................... 202 Gambar 43. Cangkang
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans

    A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans

    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
  • Decapoda: Brachyura) from the Middle Pleisto- Cene Atsumi Group, Japan, with Notes on Hexapus Anfractus (Rathbun, 1909) from the Holocene Nanyo Formation, Japan

    Decapoda: Brachyura) from the Middle Pleisto- Cene Atsumi Group, Japan, with Notes on Hexapus Anfractus (Rathbun, 1909) from the Holocene Nanyo Formation, Japan

    Online ISSN 2435-0931 Print ISSN 0385-0900 Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, no. 47, 59–63, 2 figs. ©2020, Mizunami Fossil Museum Manuscript accepted on July 12, 2020; online published on August 30, 2020 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5764751E-E02D-4D5B-8B1A-23CFF954A48E A new hexapodid crab (Decapoda: Brachyura) from the Middle Pleisto- cene Atsumi Group, Japan, with notes on Hexapus anfractus (Rathbun, 1909) from the Holocene Nanyo Formation, Japan Hiroaki Karasawa* and Nobuaki Kobayashi** *Mizunami Fossil Museum, Yamanouchi, Akeyo, Mizunami, Gifu 509-6132, Japan <[email protected]> **MFM Friends; Dosen 5-1, Takenoya-cho, Gamagori, Aichi 443-0046, Japan Abstract Mariaplax ohiranorikoae, a new species of the crab family Hexapodidae Miers is described from the Middle Pleistocene Atsumi Group of Aichi Prefecture, central Japan. This is the second record for Mariaplax Rahayu and Ng from the Pleistocene deposits of Japan. Hexapus anfractus (Rathbun) recorded from the Holocene Nanyo Formation is re-evaluated and identified with the extant species, Mariaplax chenae Rahayu and Ng. Key words: Eubrachyura, Hexapodidae, Mariaplax, Quaternary, Japan Introduction and Karasawa, 1998) is re-examined and identified with Mariaplax chenae. Karasawa et al. (2014) reported a single carapace of The specimens described herein are deposited in Hexapus sp. cfr. H. anfractus (Rathbun, 1909) (Eubrach- the Mizunami Fossil Museum (MFM). yura: Hexapodidae) from the Middle Pleistocene Atsumi Group of central Japan. In the same year, Ra- Systematics hayu and Ng (2014) erected the new genus Mariaplax Rahayu and Ng, 2014, with the type species, Lamb- Family Hexapodidae Miers, 1886 dophallus anfractus Rathbun, 1909.
  • The Species of Moloha Barnard, 1946, from the Western Indian Ocean, with the Description of a New Species from India (Crustacea: Brachyura: Homolidae)

    The Species of Moloha Barnard, 1946, from the Western Indian Ocean, with the Description of a New Species from India (Crustacea: Brachyura: Homolidae)

    European Journal of Taxonomy 166: 1–25 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2015.166 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2015 · Ng P.K.L. & Kumar A.B. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FE328725-7017-417D-B140-71D830B89316 The species of Moloha Barnard, 1946, from the western Indian Ocean, with the description of a new species from India (Crustacea: Brachyura: Homolidae) Peter K.L. NG 1,* & Appukuttannair Biju KUMAR 2 1 Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 2 Conservatory Drive, Singapore 117377, Republic of Singapore. 2 Department of Aquatic Biology & Fisheries, University of Kerala, Kariavattom, Thiruvananthapuram – 695581, Kerala, India. Email: [email protected] * Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:8ACB5B5C-7DC3-43A7-82E4-420AD0FF7377 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:B07B1EE1-AD4E-4FEC-A968-90A4A831ACA1 Abstract. The taxonomy of the deep-water homolid crabs Moloha grandperrini Guinot & Richer de Forges, 1995 and M. alisae Guinot & Richer de Forges, 1995 is re-examined, and the types redescribed and figured. Moloha alisae is reported from South Africa for the first time. A new species with an inflated carapace, M. tumida sp. nov., is also described from southern India and compared with its closest congeners. Keywords. Crustacea, Homolidae, Moloha, India, taxonomy. Ng P.K.L. & Kumar A.B. 2015. The species of Moloha Barnard, 1946, from the western Indian Ocean, with the description of a new species from India (Crustacea: Brachyura: Homolidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 166: 1–25.
  • The University of Michigan

    The University of Michigan

    CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN VOL. 31, NO. 4, PP. 89-118 July 30, 2004 NEW DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA) FROM THE MIDDLE AND LATE EOCENE OF PAKISTAN AND A REVISION OF LOBONOTUS A. MILNE EDWARDS, 1864 BY CARRIE E. SCHWEITZER, RODNEY M. FELDMANN, AND PHILIP D. GINGERICH MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY Philip D. Gingerich, Director This series of contributions from the Museum of Paleontology is a medium for publication of papers based chiefly on collections in the Museum. When the number of pages issued is sufficient to make a volume, a title page plus a table of contents will be sent to libraries on the Museum’s mailing list. This will be sent to individuals on request. A list of the separate issues may also be obtained by request. Correspondence should be directed to the Publications Secretary, Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1079 ([email protected]). VOLS. 1-31: Parts of volumes may be obtained if available. Price lists are available upon inquiry. See also: www.paleontology.lsa.umich.edu/Publications/publicationIntro.html Text and illustrations ©2004 by the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan NEW DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA) FROM THE MIDDLE AND LATE EOCENE OF PAKISTAN AND A REVISION OF LOBONOTUS A. MILNE EDWARDS, 1864 BY CARRIE E. SCHWEITZER1, RODNEY M. FELDMANN2, AND PHILIP D. GINGERICH3 Abstract– Recovery of new decapod specimens from middle and late Eocene rocks of Pakistan prompted reevaluation of the known decapod fauna of the region.
  • Ecological Character Description for Roebuck Bay

    Ecological Character Description for Roebuck Bay

    ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DESCRIPTION FOR ROEBUCK BAY Wetland Research & Management ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DESCRIPTION FOR ROEBUCK BAY Report prepared for the Department of Environment and Conservation by Bennelongia Pty Ltd 64 Jersey Street, Jolimont WA 6913 www.bennelongia.com.au In association with: DHI Water & Environment Pty Ltd 4A/Level 4, Council House 27-29 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 www.dhigroup.com.au Wetland Research & Management 28 William Street, Glen Forrest WA 6071 April 2009 Cover photographs: Roebuck Bay, © Jan Van de Kam, The Netherlands Introductory Notes This Ecological Character Description (ECD Publication) has been prepared in accordance with the National Framework and Guidance for Describing the Ecological Character of Australia’s Ramsar Wetlands (National Framework) (Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2008). The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) prohibits actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of a Ramsar wetland unless the Commonwealth Environment Minister has approved the taking of the action, or some other provision in the EPBC Act allows the action to be taken. The information in this ECD Publication does not indicate any commitment to a particular course of action, policy position or decision. Further, it does not provide assessment of any particular action within the meaning of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), nor replace the role of the Minister or his delegate in making an informed decision to approve an action. This ECD Publication is provided without prejudice to any final decision by the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia on change in ecological character in accordance with the requirements of Article 3.2 of the Ramsar Convention.
  • Bulletin 103

    Bulletin 103

    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM Bulletin 103 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY AND PALEON- TOLOGY OF THE CANAL ZONE, PANAMA, AND GEOLOGICALLY RELATED AREAS IN CEN- TRAL AMERICA AND THE WEST INDIES DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS FROM THE PANAMA REGION By MARY J. RATHBUN Associate in Zoology, United States National Museum Extract from Bulletin 103, pages 123-184, with Plates 54-6 Jk frjjj P^' !F> WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1918 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM Bulletin 103 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY AND PALEON- TOLOGY OF THE CANAL ZONE, PANAMA, AND GEOLOGICALLY RELATED AREAS IN CEN- TRAL AMERICA AND THE WEST INDIES. DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS FROM THE PANAMA REGION By MARY J. RATHBUN Associate in Zoology, United States National Museum Extract from Bulletin 103, pages 123-184, with Plates 54-66 ISSUED : 919 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1918 DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS FROM THE PANAMA REGION. By Mart J. Rathbun, Associate in Zoology, United States National Museum. INTRODUCTION. Fifty-eight species of Decapods are enumerated from the collec- tions examined by the author. Three species described by other authors are inserted in systematic order, thus making the list com- plete to date for the Panama region. All the available material in the United States National Museum from Panama and Costa Rica is included; it ranges in age from the Oligocene (Culebra formation) to the Pleistocene. In the list of stations and the table of distribution the data relat- ing to Cirripedia from Dr. H. A. Pilsbry's report are included for convenience of reference. The literature on Panama Tertiary Decapods is so scanty that it is not surprising that nearly all of the forms now examined prove to be new.
  • New Hexapodid Crabs from the Eocene of Vicenza (NE Italy) (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Hexapodidae)

    New Hexapodid Crabs from the Eocene of Vicenza (NE Italy) (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Hexapodidae)

    Atti Soc. it. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. nat. Milano, 151 (I): 51-75, Gennaio 2010 Antonio De Angeli *, Danièle Guinot ** & Alessandro Garassino *** New hexapodid crabs from the Eocene of Vicenza (NE Italy) (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Hexapodidae) Abstract - The Hexapodidae was known to date from the Cenozoic of Veneto by Stevea cesarii Beschin, Busulini, De Angeli & Tessier, 1994, from the middle Eocene of Chiampo Valley (Vicenza), and Palaeopinnixa sp. from the upper Eocene of Possagno (Treviso). Recent discoveries from the Eocene of Vicenza area allowed to describe three new genera and four new species of hexapodids. Bellhexapus granulatus n. gen., n. sp., Eohexapus albertii n. gen., n. sp., and Eurohexapus lobatus n. gen., n. sp. from the middle Eocene of “Albanello” quarry at Nogarole Vicentino (Vicenza), and Palaeopinnixa alontensis n. sp. from the upper Eocene of Alonte (Vicenza). Bellhexapus granulatus n. gen., n. sp. and Eurohexapus lobatus n. gen., n. sp. preserve the carapace, the ventral and abdominal male parts, while Eohexapus albertii n. gen., n. sp. preserves the carapace, the ventral and abdominal female parts. Palaeopinnixa alontensis n. sp. preserves instead only the carapace. Key words : Crustacea, Decapoda, Hexapodidae, Eocene, NE Italy. Riassunto - Nuovi crostacei hexapodidi dell’Eocene di Vicenza (NE Italia) (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Hexapodidae). La famiglia Hexapodidae era fi nora conosciuta nel Terziario del Veneto con Stevea cesarii Beschin, Busulini, De Angeli & Tessier, 1994 dell’Eocene medio della Valle del Chiampo (Vicenza) e Palaeo- pinnixa sp. dell’Eocene superiore di Possagno (Treviso). Recenti ritrovamenti nelle rocce eoceniche del Vicentino hanno permesso di descrivere tre nuovi generi e quattro nuove specie di hexapodidi.
  • Decapoda, Brachyura)

    Decapoda, Brachyura)

    Rediscovery of the holotype of Paeduma cylindraceum (Bell, 1859) and description of a new genus of Hexapodidae (Decapoda, Brachyura) Danièle GUINOT Département Milieux et Peuplements aquatiques, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 61 rue Buffon, case postale 53, F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) [email protected] Guinot D. 2006. — Rediscovery of the holotype of Paeduma cylindraceum (Bell, 1859) and description of a new genus of Hexapodidae (Decapoda, Brachyura). Zoosystema 28 (2) : 553-571. ABSTRACT Th e hexapodid genus Paeduma Rathbun, 1897 (replacement name for Amorpho- pus Bell, 1859) was established without fi gure for a species from an unknown locality, P. cylindraceum (Bell, 1859) (described as Amorphopus cylindraceus Bell, 1859). Paeduma cylindraceum was never reported ever since, and the holotype was considered lost. Th e examination of the holotype of Paeduma cylindraceum permits to know its provenance (the Galápagos Islands or alternatively some- KEY WORDS where on American Pacifi c coast) and the exact nature of the supposedly rudi- Crustacea, mentary fi fth ambulatory leg (P5) described by Bell (1859). Th e “rudiment” Decapoda, Brachyura, is in fact the external and exposed portion of the apodeme of P4 and not an Hexapodidae, “aborted” pereopod. Th e two other species subsequently attributed to Paeduma Amorphopus, Paeduma, are referred to Hexalaughlia n. gen. A new diagnosis for Paeduma is provided, Stevea, and the status of the extant and fossil Stevea Manning & Holthuis, 1981 is Hexalaughlia n. gen., re-considered. Evaluation of Paeduma has prompted some new views on the vestigial coxa, male gonopore, family Hexapodidae, and the presence for the fi rst time of two genera of the new genus.
  • Emergency Plan

    Emergency Plan

    Environmental Impact Assessment Project Number: 43253-026 November 2019 India: Karnataka Integrated and Sustainable Water Resources Management Investment Program – Project 2 Vijayanagara Channels Annexure 5–9 Prepared by Project Management Unit, Karnataka Integrated and Sustainable Water Resources Management Investment Program Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd. for the Asian Development Bank. This is an updated version of the draft originally posted in June 2019 available on https://www.adb.org/projects/documents/ind-43253-026-eia-0 This environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Annexure 5 Implementation Plan PROGRAMME CHART FOR CANAL LINING, STRUCTURES & BUILDING WORKS Name Of the project:Modernization of Vijaya Nagara channel and distributaries Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Aug-19 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 S. No Name of the Channel 121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121212121 2 PACKAGE
  • And Their Aphid Partners (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Mashhad Region, Razavi Khorasan Province, with New Records of Aphids and Ant Species for Fauna of Iran

    And Their Aphid Partners (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Mashhad Region, Razavi Khorasan Province, with New Records of Aphids and Ant Species for Fauna of Iran

    ISSN 0973-1555(Print) ISSN 2348-7372(Online) HALTERES, Volume 6, 4-12, 2015 ZOHREH SADAT MORTAZAVI, HUSSEIN SADEGHI, NIHAT AKTAC, ŁUKASZ DEPA AND LIDA FEKRAT Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and their aphid partners (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Mashhad region, Razavi Khorasan Province, with new records of aphids and ant species for Fauna of Iran Zohreh Sadat Mortazavi1, Hussein Sadeghi1*, Nihat Aktac2, Łukasz Depa3, Lida Fekrat1 1 Department of Plant Protection, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran 2 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Trakya University, Turkey 3Department of Zoology, University of Silesia, Bankowa 9, 40-007 Katowice, Poland (e-mail: *[email protected]) Abstract A survey of ant-aphid associations was conducted by collecting and identifying samples of ants and aphids found together on aphid host plants in Mashhad region, Razavi Khorasan province of Iran. As a result, a total of 21 ant species representing 13 genera and 3 subfamilies and 26 aphid species belonging to 13 genera from 37 host plant species were collected and identified. Among the recorded ant species, the genus Crematogaster with four species had the highest species richness. The three most frequent aphid attendant ants were Lepisiota nigra (Dalla Torre, 1893), Tapinoma erraticum (Latreille, 1798) and Crematogaster inermis Mayr, 1862 associated with 11, 10 and 9 aphid species, respectively. Eleven ant species were recorded from the colonies of one aphid species. Among the recorded ants, the species Crematogaster sordidula (Nylander, 1849) is new to Iranian ant fauna. This record increases the recorded ant-fauna of Iran to over 171 species. Among the identified aphid species, Aphis craccivora Koch, 1856 had the highest ant attraction.
  • Family Cyprinidae Subfamily Labeoninae

    Family Cyprinidae Subfamily Labeoninae

    SUBFAMILY Labeoninae Bleeker, 1859 - labeonins, labeos, algae-eaters, carps etc. [=?Paeonomiae, ?Apalopterinae, Platycarinae, Temnochilae, Labeonini, ?Plalacrognathini, Garrae, Gymnostomi, Rohteichthyina, Discognathina, Parapsilorhynchidae, Banganina, Osteochilina, Semilabeoina] Notes: Name in prevailing recent practice ?Paeonomiae McClelland, 1838:943 [ref. 2924] (subfamily) ? Cirrhinus [corrected to Paeonominae by McClelland 1839:225, 261, 264 [ref. 2923]; no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] ?Apalopterinae McClelland, 1839:226, 261, 299 [ref. 2923] (subfamily) ? Platycara [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Platycarinae Macleay, 1841:271 [ref. 32498] (family) Platycara [also Macleay 1842:204 [ref. 32499]] Temnochilae Heckel, 1847:280, 281 [ref. 2068] (Abtheilung) ? Labeo [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Labeonini Bleeker, 1859d:XXVIII [ref. 371] (stirps) Labeo [family-group name used as valid by: Rainboth 1991 [ref. 32596], Nelson 1994 [ref. 26204], Yue et al. 2000 [ref. 25272], Zhang & Chen 2004 [ref. 27930], Li, Ran & Chen 2006 [ref. 29057], Nelson 2006 [ref. 32486], Zhang & Kottelat 2006 [ref. 28711], Zhang, Qiang & Lan 2008 [ref. 29452], Yang & Mayden 2010, Zheng, Yang, Chen & Wang 2010 [ref. 30961], Zhu, Zhang, Zhang & Han 2011 [ref. 31305], Yang et al. 2012a, Yang et al. 2012b [ref. 32362]] ?Phalacrognathini Bleeker, 1860a:422 [ref. 370] (cohors) ? Labeo [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Garrae Bleeker, 1863–64:24 [ref. 4859] (phalanx) Garra [also Bleeker 1863b:191 [ref. 397]; stem Garr- confirmed by Smith 1945:259 [ref. 4056], by Cavender & Coburn in Mayden 1992:322 [ref. 23260], by Mirza 2000:356 [ref.
  • Endemic Animals of India

    Endemic Animals of India

    ENDEMIC ANIMALS OF INDIA Edited by K. VENKATARAMAN A. CHATTOPADHYAY K.A. SUBRAMANIAN ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA Prani Vigyan Bhawan, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata-700 053 Phone: +91 3324006893, +91 3324986820 website: www.zsLgov.in CITATION Venkataraman, K., Chattopadhyay, A. and Subramanian, K.A. (Editors). 2013. Endemic Animals of India (Vertebrates): 1-235+26 Plates. (Published by the Director, Zoological Survey ofIndia, Kolkata) Published: May, 2013 ISBN 978-81-8171-334-6 Printing of Publication supported by NBA © Government ofIndia, 2013 Published at the Publication Division by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, M -Block, New Alipore, Kolkata-700053. Printed at Hooghly Printing Co., Ltd., Kolkata-700 071. ~~ "!I~~~~~ NATIONA BIODIVERSITY AUTHORITY ~.1it. ifl(itCfiW I .3lUfl IDr. (P. fJJa{a~rlt/a Chairman FOREWORD Each passing day makes us feel that we live in a world with diminished ecological diversity and disappearing life forms. We have been extracting energy, materials and organisms from nature and altering landscapes at a rate that cannot be a sustainable one. Our nature is an essential partnership; an 'essential', because each living species has its space and role', and performs an activity vital to the whole; a 'partnership', because the biological species or the living components of nature can only thrive together, because together they create a dynamic equilibrium. Nature is further a dynamic entity that never remains the same- that changes, that adjusts, that evolves; 'equilibrium', that is in spirit, balanced and harmonious. Nature, in fact, promotes evolution, radiation and diversity. The current biodiversity is an inherited vital resource to us, which needs to be carefully conserved for our future generations as it holds the key to the progress in agriculture, aquaculture, clothing, food, medicine and numerous other fields.