"Predatory" Goddesses Author(S): Mary R. Lefkowitz Source: Hesperia, Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

"Predatory" Goddesses Author(s): Mary R. Lefkowitz Source: Hesperia, Vol. 71, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 2002), pp. 325-344 Published by: American School of Classical Studies at Athens Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3182040 . Accessed: 08/02/2011 13:20 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ascsa. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American School of Classical Studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Hesperia. http://www.jstor.org HESPERIA 7I (2002) "P R E DATO RY" Pages 325-344 G O D D E S S E S AB STRACT It is oftenassumed that depictions on Atticvases ofthe goddessEos carrying offyoungmortals were meant to conveya strongnegative message about the dangersof femalesexuality. But canwe be surethat the mythsabout Eos and herlovers,like those of abductionsof mortalsby othergods, were intended as commentarieson humansexual conduct? Goddesses (unlike women) are im- mortal,ageless, and powerfilLEvidence from the ancientsources suggests insteadthat depictionsof abductionsby Eos weremeant to representboth the romanceand anguish of divlneinterventions into mortallife, andto re- mindtheir users of the inexorablepower of the gods. ABDUCTIONS OF MORTALS BY EOS AND OTHER GODDESSES The malegods of ancientGreece are known for theirinterest in mortal women.lBut goddesses also were active in seekingout mortal consorts, at leastin theera before the Trojan War, when the gods were still dining with mortals([Hes.] Cat., fr. 1.1-10 MW; Hes. Theog. 585-587). Hesiod'sTheo- gony,in theform in which it hascome down to us,ends with a catalogueof Zeus'sconsorts and children, followed by thoseof the othergods (Hes. Theog.886-962). To this catalogueis appendeda list of"the immortal 1. Comparethe Hebrewtradition C.Sourvinou-Inwood for advice and Maine(Fig. 6); Museo archeologico aboutthe originof the giantsknown as encouragement;and to C. Gentilesco nazionaledi Ferrara(Fig. 7); Madrid, theNephelim: "the gods saw that the foreditorial assistance. Acknowledg- Museoarqueologico nacional (Fig. 8); daughtersof humanswere attractive, mentis madealso to the following: HermitageMuseum, St. Petersburg andthey took wives from whomever Antikensammlung,Staatliche Museen (Fig.9); Musei Vaticani, Archivo theychose" (Genesis 6.2); West 1997, zuBerlin, Preussischer Kulturbesitz fotografico(Fig. 10); Soprintendenza p.117. (Figs.1, 14);Baltimore Museum of Art archeologicaper Etruria meridionale My thanksespecially to D. von (Fig.2); Walters Art Museum,Balti- (Fig.11); Musee du Louvre,Paris Bothmer,M. Kilmer,and also to the more(Fig. 3); Museum of FineArts, (Fig.12); British Museum, London refereesand editors of Hesperiafor Boston(Fig. 4); Metropolitan Museum (Fig.13). Translations, unless other- specificimprovements and corrections; ofArt, New York(Fig. 5); Bowdoin wisenoted, are my own. toE. R. Knauer,B. Ridgway,and CollegeMuseum of Art,Brunswick, 326 MARY R. LEFKOWITZ goddesseswho bedded with mortal men and bore children who resembled the gods"(Hes. Theog.967-968): Demeterand Iasion, Harmonia and Kadmos,Kallirhoe and Chrysaor, Eos andTithonos, Eos andKephalos, Medeiaand Iason, Psamathe and Aiakos, Thetis and Peleus, Aphrodite andAnchises, Kirke and Odysseus, and Kalypso and Odysseus (Hes. Theog. 969-1020).2When in the OdysseyKalypso complains that the gods are jealousof the goddesseswho sleepwith mortalmen, she alludesto the storyof Eosand Orion along with that of Demeterand Iasion (Od. 5.118- 128).Homer also mentions Eos and Kleitos (Od. 15.572-575), and Sappho alludesto thestory of Aphroditeand Adonis (fr. 140 Voigt).3The Hesiodic Catalogueof Women,although mostly about the liaisons of godswith mor- talwomen, appears to haveincluded accounts of Thetis'smarriage to Peleus (fr.210-211 MW) andof Selene'sromance with Endymion (fr. 245 MW).4 In viewof the frequencywith which these stories turn up in Archaic poetry,it is notsurprising that the gods' liaisons with mortals are frequently portrayedon vases by Athenian painters, or that Eos and her lovers appear on a relativelylarge proportion of them.In thevases catalogued by Sophia Kaempf-Dimitriadouthere are more scenes depicting Eos andher lovers thanscenes portraying Zeus, either with femalemortals or with Gany- medes.5The mythof Eos andKephalos had special appeal for an Athe- nianaudience because Kephalos was a localboy; so didvases depicting the abductionof the Athenianprincess Oreithyia by the wind-godBoreas.6 The Eos vaseshad a wideappeal for Athenian audiences, as well as for theItalian market: 37 of 210 red-figuredvases listed by CarinaWeiss were foundin mainlandItaly or Sicily,and 38 areNolan amphoras.7 Kaempf- Dimitriadouconcluded that scenes in which gods abducted mortals might haveserved as remindersof the precariousnessof human existence.8 She alsosuggested that scenes in whichEos carriedoff youngmen might in somecases have served as consolationin timeof death.9 In recentyears, however, scholars have sought to extrapolateinforma- tionfrom these scenes about Athenian attitudes toward human male and femalesexuality. Andrew Stewart, in a detaileddiscussion of theEos vases, rightlymakes a carefuldistinction between ordinary rape of mortalsby 2. On the traditionthat Medeia was of Demeter/Iasiontakes place in a 109,there are 147 sceneswith Eos and immortal,c£ Pind.Pyth. 4.11;Braswell plowedfield, like the ritualmarriage of herlovers as opposedto 116 depicting 1988, p.76. The mythof Kirkemay the goddessInanna to the kingof Su- Zeusand his lovers(60 withwomen haveits originsin NearEastern epic: mer.One kingis evencalled Dumuzi, and56 with Ganymedes).Boreas and Ishtarin the Gilgameshepic turns two the nameof herdivine spouse; cf. Oreithyiais the nextmost popular of herlovers into animals(Gilg. 3.7, Frymer-Kensky1992, pp. 50-57. subjectwith 56, followedby Poseidon 6.2.26); seeWest 1997, p.408, n. 14. 4. On Seleneand Endymion, see andhis loverswith 40. The mythsabout Eos andher lovers Ap. Rhod.4.57; the storymay come 6. Bothmyths were portrayed in the mayhave influenced the characteriza- fromMusaeus's Theogony (cf. Epi- akroteriaof the Athenians'temple at tion of Kalypso,Kirke, and Aphrodite; menides3B2 I 33 DK;see FGrHist Delos;Robertson 1975, p. 356. cf. Boedeker1974, pp.64-84; Friedrich IIIb Suppl.I, p. 575).Another of 7. LIMC III, 1986,pp. 759-775, 1978, pp.39-43. Selene'smortal lovers was the Eleu- s.v.Eros (C. Weiss). 3. The mythof Aphrodite/Adonis sinianruler and hierophant Eumolpos, 8. Kaempf-Dimitriadou1969, cameto Cyprusand Asia Minor from by herthe fatherof Musaeus(Philo- pp.47-53. the cultof Ishtarand Thammuz in chorus328, FGrHist F208 = schol. 9. Kaempf-Dimitriadou1969, p.57; Syria;see Page1955, p.127. On the Ar.Ran. 1033). Vermeule1979, pp. 162-178;LIMC identityof Aphroditewith Ishtar, cf. 5. In the catalogueof vasesin III, 1986,p. 779, s.v.Eos (C. Weiss). Burkert1992, pp.20,97-98. The union Kaempf-Dimitriadou1969, pp. 76- PREDATORY GODDESSES 327 mortalsand the eroticinterventions into human life madeby gods.l° But he accountsfor the popularityof the Eos vasesby suggestingthat they mighthave been understood as a meansof definingand justifying the dominanceof malesexuality: "Mythological pursuits and abductions rep- resentnothing more or less thanthe projectionof Athenianmale desire firstupon the heroicworld and then upon the divineone.''1l Whatrole do the Eosvases play in this"projection of Athenianmale desire"?Stewart suggests that the discourse about Eos and her boy victims mayultimately be intendedas a warning:"not only do thesepictures hint at the evilsoffemale dominance (gynaikoArateia) and easy capitulation to desire,but nervouslyevoke their appalling consequences: female control of thephallus.''l2 Robin Osborne agrees with Stewart that female pursuers invertthe normal codes of sexualbehavior.l3 In hisview, the vases provide a displayof whatnever could or shouldhappen in Atheniansociety, be- causeof the closerestrictions on femaledesire, at leastamong respectable women:"in limiting scenes of femalepursuit to the caseof the winged Eos,pot painterswere able both to suggestthat women did desiremen andthat female desire could not be activein the realworld.''14 In thepresent article I arguethat Kaempf-Dimitriadou's understand- ingofthe purposeofthe Eosvases is morelikely to be correct:the primary purposeof the vaseswas to remindviewers of the powerof the godsto alterthe courseof humanlife, whether for better or worse. Painters who wishedto commenton thesexuality of mortalfemales did not need to use depictionsof goddessesto do so.In anycase,
Recommended publications
  • The Dioskouroi on Four-Figure Etruscan Mirrors
    THE DIOSKOUROI ON FOUR-FIGURE ETRUSCAN MIRRORS By DANIEL “WOOD D” WEBER A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2006 Copyright 2006 by DANIEL “WOOD D” WEBER Oh Muses, sing of my very own ‘divine’ twins, clear-voiced Ariel Faith and lovely-haired Gabryelle Raina, to whom I lovingly dedicate this study. TABLE OF CONTENTS page LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................. vi LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... vii ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................1 Etruscan Bronzeworking ..............................................................................................1 The Dioskouroi/ Tinas Cliniar......................................................................................2 2 CHARACTERISTICS OF ETRUSCAN BRONZE MIRRORS..................................4 Material and Limitations...............................................................................................4 Types of Mirrors and Terminology ..............................................................................6 Inscriptions ...................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Frances Brealey 29001509 2014
    PERCEPTIONS OF DIVINITY THE CHANGING CHARACTERS OF ROMAN VENUS Frances Brealey 29001509 2014 A thesis submitted to the University of Wales Trinity Saint David in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Master’s Degrees by Examination and Dissertation Declaration Form. 1. This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Name: Frances Elizabeth Brealey Date: 20th March 2014 2. This dissertation is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Name: Frances Elizabeth Brealey Date: 20th March 2014 3. This dissertation is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Name: Frances Elizabeth Brealey Date: 20th March 2014 4. I hereby give consent for my dissertation, if accepted, to be available for photocopying, inter- library loan, and for deposit in the University’s digital repository Name: Frances Elizabeth Brealey Date: 20th March 2014 Supervisor’s Declaration. I am satisfied that this work is the result of the student’s own efforts. Signed: …………………………………………………………………………... Date: …………….......................................................................................... Contents Abstract iii Acknowledgements iv List of Figures v Introduction 1 Chapter 1 The Gods of the Romans: The Changing Paradigm 5 1.1 The Old Paradigm: Primitivism
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections MARRIAGE AND PARENTHOOD ON CLASSICAL PERIOD BRONZE MIRRORS : T HE CASE OF LATVA AND TUNTLE Alexandra A. Carpino Northern Arizona University ABSTRACT The scenes that enhanced the reverse sides of the Etruscans’ bronze mirrors were not just a form of entertainment. Rather, mirror iconography provided elite Etruscans of both genders with a range of ideas to ponder as they fashioned their appearances daily within the domestic sphere. During the 4th century BCE, the number of depictions of parents drawn from the broad Hellenic repertoire known to the Etruscan aristocracy soars. Two individuals who stand out as particularly popular were Latva (Leda) and Tuntle (Tyndareos), who appear in the context of a specifically Etruscan narrative known as the “Delivery of Elinai’s (Helen’s) Egg.” This study focuses on the social significance of these scenes and the messages they imparted through their compositional structure and the various attributes of the characters depicted. It is suggested that they can be read as promoting positive paradigms of marriage and parenthood that served as enduring inspirations for the mirrors’ users and viewers. uring the 4th and 3rd centuries in Etruria, ponder as they fashioned and refashioned their communities in both the south and the north had to appearances on a daily basis within the private sphere of cDontend with foreign incursions, raids and the their homes. It also offers scholars today a window into consequences of conquest. Despite these challenges, this the mindsets of the artifacts’ aristocratic purchasers/ time in Etruscan history was especially prolific with owners, expressing many of the values and beliefs they respect to the creation and diversity of high quality art: and their families prized from the Archaic period onward.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo and the Mundus of Caere Naomi Laura Neufeld
    APOLLO AND THE MUNDUS OF CAERE NAOMI LAURA NEUFELD APOLLO AND THE MUNDUS OF CAERE: AN INTERPRETATION OF THE PALM TREE FRESCOES OF THE HYPOGAEUM OF CLEPSINA By NAOMI LAURA NEUFELD, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University © Copyright by Naomi Laura Neufeld, August 2015 DESCRIPTIVE NOTE: McMaster University MASTER OF ARTS (2015) Hamilton, Ontario (Classics) TITLE: Apollo and the Mundus of Caere: An Interpretation of the Palm Tree Frescoes of the Hypogaeum of Clepsina AUTHOR: Naomi Laura Neufeld, B.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISORS: Dr. Spencer Pope and Dr. Fabio Colivicchi NUMBER OF PAGES: xi, 141 ii LAY ABSTRACT: The Hypogaeum of Clepsina is an underground ritual chamber in Caere, which scholars theorize to be a mundus, a liminal space where chthonic rituals were enacted in honour of the infernal gods. The mundus was tied to notions of civic foundation, which suggests that the hypogaeum’s construction (or renovation) around the year 273 BC, the time when the city of Caere was officially converted into a Roman praefectura, was a statement of Rome’s re-establishment of Caere. Thus, gaining a deeper understanding of the hypogaeum, especially the cults worshiped within it, contributes to our knowledge of the role that religion played in Roman expansion during the Republican period. The palm tree frescoes decorating the niche of the hypogaeum provide important clues as to the identity of the deity worshiped in the mundus. They are a reference to the god, Apollo Soranus, or Śuri, who was a chthonic deity fitting to preside over the mundus of Caere.
    [Show full text]
  • Call to Juno Author's Note
    Author’s Note Te Etruscans have long absorbed me. I was inspired to write the Tales of Ancient Rome series when I chanced upon a photo of a sixth century BCE sarcophagus upon which a husband and wife were sculpted in a pose of afection. Tese lovers, known as “the Married Couple,” intrigued me. What ancient culture exalted marital fdelity with such open sensuality? Te answer led me to Etruria and the story of the siege of Veii. Tis confict raged for ten years between two cities that lay only twelve miles apart across the Tiber. Amazingly, the customs and beliefs of these enemies were so diferent that it was as though an expanse of water divided a Renaissance society from one living in the Dark Ages. Given this disparity, I was inspired to create a couple from these opposing worlds whose love must not only transcend war but also withstand the pressures of conficting moralities, allegiances, and beliefs. For those new to the series, you might like to read my author’s notes for Te Wedding Shroud and Te Golden Dice, in which I discuss topics such as the origins and religion of the Etruscans (including the Etruscan Discipline), bisexuality and pederasty, human sacrifce, and the status of women in Etruria and Rome 516 ELISABETH STORRS (including information about prostitution and concubines). You can access these notes under the Learn More tab on my website, http://elisabethstorrs.com, together with pieces of research and photographs on my blog, Triclinium, at http://elisabethstorrs.com/ category/blog/triclinium. An extended version of this note is also posted on my website.
    [Show full text]
  • Abhiyoga Jain Gods
    A babylonian goddess of the moon A-a mesopotamian sun goddess A’as hittite god of wisdom Aabit egyptian goddess of song Aakuluujjusi inuit creator goddess Aasith egyptian goddess of the hunt Aataentsic iriquois goddess Aatxe basque bull god Ab Kin Xoc mayan god of war Aba Khatun Baikal siberian goddess of the sea Abaangui guarani god Abaasy yakut underworld gods Abandinus romano-celtic god Abarta irish god Abeguwo melansian rain goddess Abellio gallic tree god Abeona roman goddess of passage Abere melanisian goddess of evil Abgal arabian god Abhijit hindu goddess of fortune Abhijnaraja tibetan physician god Abhimukhi buddhist goddess Abhiyoga jain gods Abonba romano-celtic forest goddess Abonsam west african malicious god Abora polynesian supreme god Abowie west african god Abu sumerian vegetation god Abuk dinkan goddess of women and gardens Abundantia roman fertility goddess Anzu mesopotamian god of deep water Ac Yanto mayan god of white men Acacila peruvian weather god Acala buddhist goddess Acan mayan god of wine Acat mayan god of tattoo artists Acaviser etruscan goddess Acca Larentia roman mother goddess Acchupta jain goddess of learning Accasbel irish god of wine Acco greek goddess of evil Achiyalatopa zuni monster god Acolmitztli aztec god of the underworld Acolnahuacatl aztec god of the underworld Adad mesopotamian weather god Adamas gnostic christian creator god Adekagagwaa iroquois god Adeona roman goddess of passage Adhimukticarya buddhist goddess Adhimuktivasita buddhist goddess Adibuddha buddhist god Adidharma buddhist goddess
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Carved Ambers in the J. Paul Getty Museum
    Ancient Carved Ambers in the J. Paul Getty Museum Ancient Carved Ambers in the J. Paul Getty Museum Faya Causey With technical analysis by Jeff Maish, Herant Khanjian, and Michael R. Schilling THE J. PAUL GETTY MUSEUM, LOS ANGELES This catalogue was first published in 2012 at http: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data //museumcatalogues.getty.edu/amber. The present online version Names: Causey, Faya, author. | Maish, Jeffrey, contributor. | was migrated in 2019 to https://www.getty.edu/publications Khanjian, Herant, contributor. | Schilling, Michael (Michael Roy), /ambers; it features zoomable high-resolution photography; free contributor. | J. Paul Getty Museum, issuing body. PDF, EPUB, and MOBI downloads; and JPG downloads of the Title: Ancient carved ambers in the J. Paul Getty Museum / Faya catalogue images. Causey ; with technical analysis by Jeff Maish, Herant Khanjian, and Michael Schilling. © 2012, 2019 J. Paul Getty Trust Description: Los Angeles : The J. Paul Getty Museum, [2019] | Includes bibliographical references. | Summary: “This catalogue provides a general introduction to amber in the ancient world followed by detailed catalogue entries for fifty-six Etruscan, Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Greek, and Italic carved ambers from the J. Paul Getty Museum. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a The volume concludes with technical notes about scientific copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4 investigations of these objects and Baltic amber”—Provided by .0/. Figures 3, 9–17, 22–24, 28, 32, 33, 36, 38, 40, 51, and 54 are publisher. reproduced with the permission of the rights holders Identifiers: LCCN 2019016671 (print) | LCCN 2019981057 (ebook) | acknowledged in captions and are expressly excluded from the CC ISBN 9781606066348 (paperback) | ISBN 9781606066355 (epub) BY license covering the rest of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Etymology 2 Greek Literature
    Eos For other uses, see Eos (disambiguation). Quintus Smyrnaeus pictured her exulting in her heart over the radiant horses (Lampus and Phaëton) that drew her chariot, amidst the bright-haired Horae, the feminine In Greek mythology, Ēōs (/ˈiːɒs/; Ancient Greek: Ἠώς, Hours, climbing the arc of heaven and scattering sparks or Ἕως, Éōs, “dawn”, pronounced [ɛːɔ̌ːs] or [éɔːs]; also of fire.[6] Αὔως, Aýōs in Aeolic) is a Titaness and the goddess[1] of the dawn, who rose each morning from her home at the She is most often associated with her Homeric epithet edge of the Oceanus. “rosy-fingered” (rhododactylos), but Homer also calls her Eos had a brother and a sister. Helios, god of the sun, and Eos Erigeneia: Selene, goddess of the moon. That brightest of stars appeared, Eosphoros, that most often heralds the 1 Etymology light of early-rising Dawn (Eos Erigeneia). —Odyssey xiii.93 Eos is cognate to Vedic Sanskrit Ushas and Latin Aurora, both goddesses of dawn, and all three considered deriva- tives of a PIE stem *h₂ewsṓs[2] (later *Ausṓs), “dawn”, a stem that also gave rise to Proto-Germanic *Austrō, Old Hesiod wrote: Germanic Ôstara and Old English Ēostre/Ēastre. And after these Erigeneia [ 2 Greek literature extquotedblEarly-born extquotedbl] bore the star Eosphoros (“Dawn-bringer”), and the The dawn goddess Eos was almost always described with gleaming stars with which heaven is crowned. rosy fingers (ῥοδοδάκτυλος, rhododáktylos) or rosy fore- —Theogony 378-382 arms (ῥοδόπηχυς, rhodópēkhys) as she opened the gates of heaven for the Sun to rise.[3] In Homer,[4] her saffron- coloured robe is embroidered or woven with flowers;[5] rosy-fingered and with golden arms, she is pictured on Thus Eos, preceded by the Morning Star, is seen as the Attic vases as a beautiful woman, crowned with a tiara genetrix of all the stars and planets; her tears are con- or diadem and with the large white-feathered wings of a sidered to have created the morning dew, personified as bird.
    [Show full text]
  • RY" Pages 325-344 G O D D E S S E S
    HESPERIA 7I (2002) "P R E DATO RY" Pages 325-344 G O D D E S S E S AB STRACT It is oftenassumed that depictions on Atticvases ofthe goddessEos carrying offyoungmortals were meant to conveya strongnegative message about the dangersof femalesexuality. But canwe be surethat the mythsabout Eos and herlovers,like those of abductionsof mortalsby othergods, were intended as commentarieson humansexual conduct? Goddesses (unlike women) are im- mortal,ageless, and powerfilLEvidence from the ancientsources suggests insteadthat depictionsof abductionsby Eos weremeant to representboth the romanceand anguish of divlneinterventions into mortallife, andto re- mindtheir users of the inexorablepower of the gods. ABDUCTIONS OF MORTALS BY EOS AND OTHER GODDESSES The malegods of ancientGreece are known for theirinterest in mortal women.lBut goddesses also were active in seekingout mortal consorts, at leastin theera before the Trojan War, when the gods were still dining with mortals([Hes.] Cat., fr. 1.1-10 MW; Hes. Theog. 585-587). Hesiod'sTheo- gony,in theform in which it hascome down to us,ends with a catalogueof Zeus'sconsorts and children, followed by thoseof the othergods (Hes. Theog.886-962). To this catalogueis appendeda list of"the immortal 1. Comparethe Hebrewtradition C.Sourvinou-Inwood for advice and Maine(Fig. 6); Museo archeologico aboutthe originof the giantsknown as encouragement;and to C. Gentilesco nazionaledi Ferrara(Fig. 7); Madrid, theNephelim: "the gods saw that the foreditorial assistance. Acknowledg- Museoarqueologico nacional (Fig. 8); daughtersof humanswere attractive, mentis madealso to the following: HermitageMuseum, St. Petersburg andthey took wives from whomever Antikensammlung,Staatliche Museen (Fig.9); Musei Vaticani, Archivo theychose" (Genesis 6.2); West 1997, zuBerlin, Preussischer Kulturbesitz fotografico(Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomical Votive Reliefs As Evidence for Specialization at Healing Sanctuaries in the Ancient Mediterranean World
    Athens Journal of Health - Volume 1, Issue 1 – Pages 47-62 Anatomical Votive Reliefs as Evidence for Specialization at Healing Sanctuaries in the Ancient Mediterranean World By Steven M. Oberhelman In the ancient Greek and Roman worlds, people flocked to the healing centers of various gods and goddesses for the cure of diseases and for relief from painful injuries and disabilities. The famous Greek healing god was Asclepius (in Rome called Aesculapius), but other gods had sanctuaries where suppliants could be healed—for example, in Greece Amphiareus, and in Italy Menvra, Diana, and Juno. After recovering health and wellbeing, grateful suppliants dedicated anatomical votive reliefs in the sanctuary to testify to the god’s power. I will examine in this paper the thousands of anatomical reliefs found in the excavations of these sanctuaries. My purpose is to sketch out a map of healing centers that specialized in particular diseases. For example, it seems that of the Asclepian sanctuaries the one in Athens specialized in ocular diseases, while the cult center at Corinth was a place for patients with limb and appendage injuries and genital-urinary problems. In Italy, the cult at Ponte di Nona treated patients with foot and leg injuries as well as headaches and migraines, while other cult centers emphasized childbirth and gynecological matters. While the injured and the diseased in the classical world knew that many local healing centers were available to them, there were, as I will demonstrate, highly specialized centers of healing that they frequented. I will offer reasons for the specializations at certain centers (e.g., rural vs.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exemplary Heroine in the Hippolytos
    Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity Classical Studies Faculty Research Classical Studies Department 2010 An Exemplary Heroine in the Hippolytos Corinne Ondine Pache Trinity University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/class_faculty Part of the Classics Commons Repository Citation Pache, C.O. (2010). An exemplary heroine in the Hippolytos. In M. Meyer & R. von den Hoff (Eds.), Helden wie sie: Übermensch - Vorbild - Kultfigur in der griechischen Antike (pp. 137-152). Rombach Verlag. This Contribution to Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Classical Studies Department at Digital Commons @ Trinity. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classical Studies Faculty Research by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Trinity. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CORINNE ONDlNE PACHE An Exemplary Heroine in the Hippolytos ta 6£ £; t�v np6Kpw Kal ol n:avtE� �OOUOL\'. Pausanias 10 ..29 . 6 In this. paper I examine the link between. cuhic and dramatic heroes, and more particularly thestatus of cult heroes as exempl�ry. figures for pro­ tagonsi ts in tragedy. A hero in ancient Greek cultural terms is a human being who becomes heroized after death, a figure of' cult, that is, who requires worship an_d .sacrifice.1 Heroes a_r� also central tR epic an.d tragedy, yet becaus<; of the losaJ_na�ure of hero. cults, heroes' statusas.. objec.i:� of worship is rarely explicit in poetry. Poets .typically avoid references to par.­ ticuJar loc.al prac it ces , and focus instead on the figure of the hero before his or her heroization, tcJljng their deeds and remembering their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • “Mothering” Figures: Conceiving and Raising an Infant As a Collective Process in the Greek, Etruscan, and Roman Worlds
    Open Theology 2020; 6: 145–166 Motherhood(s) in Religions: The Religionification of Motherhood and Mothers’ Appropriation of Religion Giulia Pedrucci* Kourotrophia and “Mothering” Figures: Conceiving and Raising an Infant as a Collective Process in the Greek, Etruscan, and Roman Worlds. Some Religious Evidences in Narratives and Art https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0002 Received September 24, 2019; accepted November 14, 2019 Abstract: The paper deals with significantly different sources and historical periods: the parts dedicated to breastfeeding are based on votive statuettes of adults with infant/s from ancient Latium and Southern Etruria; the ones on pregnancy and childbirth are based on two archeological sources – one from Southern Etruria and one from Imperial Rome – which show the male (divine) appropriation of exclusively female biological functions; The parts on mothering are based on the concept of “mothering figures” (male mothering, animal mothering…) through mythological examples from Greek, Etruscan, and Roman art and narratives. Despite the heterogeneous documentation, we may conclude that the mother was not the only active character in the process of conceiving, giving birth, breastfeeding, and raising an infant in the Greek, Etruscan, and Roman societies. Many other figures close to the mother – male and female – were engaged in obtaining divine protection for her and her child; in helping, supporting, and even substituting her when necessary (and, of course, when possible). The research has been conducted mainly by using
    [Show full text]