DOCSLIB.ORG

TE Lawrence in the Near East

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TE Lawrence in the Near East In Wisdom's House: T. E. Lawrence in the Near East Author(s): Linda J. Tarver Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 13, No. 3 (Jul., 1978), pp. 585-608 Published by: Sage Publications, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/260210 . Accessed: 21/12/2011 08:26 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Sage Publications, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Contemporary History. http://www.jstor.org LindaJ. Tarver In Wisdom's House: T.E. Lawrence in the Near East During his short career in the army, T.E. Lawrence wrote at length on the Middle East, from a variety of perspectives. His post-war notoriety has generated even more material about him from other authors. In 1976 alone, three new books about him were published: Peter Brent's T.E. Lawrence, John Mack's A Prince of Our Disorder: The Life of T.E. Lawrence, and Stanley and Rodelle Weintraub's Lawrence of Arabia: The Literary Impulse. Although each is largely successful in its circumscribedgoals, none of the three attempts what most earlier works about Lawrence set out to do - to recount the facts of Lawrence's political and military activities in the Middle East and to evaluate his influence there. This task has not yet been done successfully, as earlier authors have been restricted by specific biases and limited perspectives. The following discussion of Lawrence's role in and effect on Middle Eastern affairs during the world war and its aftermath is based on available primary sources, published and unpublished. Its purpose is to separate established fact from conjecture and the fantasy of the Lawrence image through examination of Lawrence's own writings. Contemporary newspaper articles concerning different aspects of the war are early testimony to the impression a description of the war in the Middle East must have made on a public inured to the hardships and casualties of the Western Front. In the West, the Clausewitzian strategy of direct confrontation prevailed, and faulty applications of ideas borrowed from leading military theorists of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries condemned to death millions on both sides. In Palestine, however, General Edmund Allenby, pre- viously unsuccessful in France, consolidated a few pieced-together regiments to wage textbook examples of mechanized warfare Journal of Contemporary History (SAGE, London and Beverly Hills), Vol 13 (1978), 585-608 586 Journal of Contemporary History against the Ottoman Empire and its German allies, and sustained limited losses.' The astounding success of the Palestine Campaigns and of the British-supported Arab Revolt earned their participants considerable acclaim. This was especially true for T.E. Lawrence, who rose from 2nd Lieutenant to Colonel during his service with the Egyptian Expedi- tionary Force. He was recognized first by the American journalist Lowell Thomas, who in 1919, after several weeks' stay in the Middle East during the war, compiled an illustrated lecture on Allenby's vic- tories. When the public evinced interest in the British officer dressed in Arab robes, working seemingly alone and independently among the Bedouin in the desert, Thomas created for Colonel Lawrence the image of a 'Paladin of Arabia' and 'Prince of Mecca.' Lawrence's complicity in the transformation, born both of a tormented ego and a desire to aid the Arab political cause at Ver- sailles, tended to sustain and amplify its effect. He provided not only Lowell Thomas, but also his biographer Robert Graves,2with infor- mation about his experiences, and aroused widespread curiosity over the private publication of his own book, Seven Pillars of Wisdom. With the appearance of Revolt in the Desert, which, as a popular abridgement of Seven Pillars, was in effect a distortion of an admit- tedly one-sided view of the war, the Lawrence legend was complete. Nevertheless, when the British public began to recoil from mention of the war, Lawrence came to be regarded as a posturing actor in a sideshow to the major conflict. Myth-makers like Thomas found useful material in the background to Lawrence's involvement in the Middle East. Lawrence was influenced greatly by his mentor, the archaeologist David G. Hogarth.3 While a student at Oxford, Lawrence's interests, tastes, and political views were moulded by Hogarth, and Lawrence entered on an archaeological career under Hogarth's wing at the Hit- tite dig Carchemish, near Aleppo. When war broke out in in 1914, thorough knowledge of the Middle East earned Hogarth consider- able influence. He obtained for Lawrence a position in the car- tographic section of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force, where Lawrence's knowledge of Sinai geography was useful. Lawrence, ambitious for higher-level duties, secured transfers first to army in- telligence and then to the overall military intelligence unit for most of the Middle East, M17. When the political intelligence unit known as the Arab Bureau was established in 1917 alongside M17 under Brig.- Gen. G.F. Clayton, Hogarth served as its Acting Director.4 Hogarth Tarver: T.E. Lawrence in the Near East 587 drew Lawrence into Bureau work, and the pair initiated production of its newsletter, the Arab Bulletin. Soon after the declaration, on 5 June 1916, of an Arab Revolt against the Ottoman Empire by Sharif Husain, the Amir of Mecca, Lawrence was appointed liaison officer and adviser to Husain's son Faisal and his forces in the Hijaz. He became one of a score of British officers working with Arab leaders, who both taught the Arabs demolition techniques useful in their raids on the Ottoman- operated Hijaz Railway, and also relayed pertinent intelligence to the British at Cairo. Here Lawrence was in his element, and he remained in action with the Arabs until shortly before the Armistice. Lawrence's published writings include seventeen separate instances of action against the Turkish forces, in which he participated be- tween January 1917 and October 1918. The total is brought to twenty-three when a list of operations conducted with Sharif Ab- dullah's Bedouin, included in a report by the then Captain Lawrence to Col. C.E. Wilson, British representativeat Jidda, is taken into ac- count. These actions took the form of a push up the Hijaz, from the region around Jidda, north to Aqaba, wherein the Arab irregular and regular forces were the principal agents. This was followed by operations in Palestine and Syria under General Allenby, in which the Arabs, under Sharif Faisal, became a flank force protecting Allenby's rear. The campaigns culminated in the occupation of Damascus by the Arabs and the establishment of Faisal's administra- tion in the area. The details of Lawrence's military actions are as follows: 1. On 3 and 4 January 1917, in the area between Mubarak and Jabal Dhifran, Lawrence participated in a raid with 35 Muhamid Bedouin. Three Turkish patrol tents were attacked and their oc- cupants killed. Lawrence's account appears in the Arab Bulletin of 15 February 1917 (all issues referred to here are printed in Secret Despatches from Arabia [London ca. 1940]). 2. On 24 March 1917, at Buair, Lawrence and a raiding party of Abdullah's Bedouin dynamited 60 rails and cut a telegraph line. 3. On 25 March 1917, at Abu al Naam, Lawrence and the same or a similar party dynamited 25 rails, damaged a water tower and two station buildings, set fire to several box-cars, a wood store and some tents, cut a telegraph line and damaged the engine and bogie of a train. 588 Journal of Contemporary History 4. On 27 March 1917, at Istabl Antar, Lawrence and a raiding party of Abdullah's Bedouin dynamited 15 rails and cut a telegraph line. 5. Two of Lawrence's accounts differ on the action of 29 March 1917. His list to Col. Wilson reads 'March 29th. Jeddah. 10 rails dynamited, telegraph cut, 5 Turks killed.' His record in the Arab Bulletin of 13 May 1917, compiled at greater leisure and so perhaps with greater accuracy, states that on that date, at Abu al-Naam, Lawrence accompanied 300 Bedouin and four gunners under Sharif Shakir in a raid on a Turkish garrison comprised of 390 infantry. The action was successful, and resulted in the demolition of the nor- thern end of the railroad station held by the Turks, and the tem- porary derailment of a passing train. 6. On 31 March 1917, at Buair (Lawrence wrote 'Buier'), Lawrence and a raiding party of Abdullah's Bedouin dynamited five rails and cut a telegraph line. 7. On 3 April 1917, at Hediah, Lawrence and a raiding party of Abdullah's Bedouin dynamited 11 rails and cut a telegraph line. 8. On 4 and 5 April 1917, in the area of Wadi Dhaiji (between Km 1121 and al-Farshah), Lawrence and a party including the Bedouin chiefs Dakhilallah, Sultan, and Mohammad al Gadhi made a raid on the railway. A mine laid on the first day failed to explode despite the passage of two trains over it, but the party relaid and detonated it the following day, thereby blowing up the rails. They left after cutting down the nearby telegraph wire and 5 poles. Lawrence's description of this raid and that of 6 April also appears in the Arab Bulletin of 13 May 1917.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proposal for a Thesis in the Field of History in Partial Fulfillment Of
    Proposal for a Thesis in the Field of History in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Master of Liberal Arts Degree Harvard University Extension School January 16, 2015 Robert W. Goggin 1060 West Addison Street Chicago, IL 60603 (886) 555-1212 [email protected] I I propose to title my thesis “The Quest for T. E. Lawrence: The Enduring Appeal and the Enigma of Lawrence of Arabia.” II. Research Problem World War I is becoming increasingly distant and remote. Although the conflict on the Western Front in Europe was one of the cataclysmic events of the twentieth century, few would be able to offer more than a sentence about major military leaders: Foch, Haig, Ludendorff, Pershing. In all likelihood, people know best the common foot soldier Paul Baumer, the fictional protagonist of Erich Marie Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front. Yet in the Middle East, in a conflict of the British with the Turks often disparaged as a sideshow, emerged a leader internationally known: Thomas Edward Lawrence, Lawrence of Arabia. In 1919, the American journalist and entrepreneur Lowell Thomas opened “With Allenby in Palestine and Lawrence in Arabia,” a theatrical presentation of lecture, film, and photographs eventually seen by some four million people, including an array of British military and political leaders and Lawrence himself. The interest has continued unabated to the present day, with Michael Korda’s 2010 biography Hero: The Life and Legend of Lawrence of Arabia1 holding a place on best- seller lists for weeks. Why has there been such a sustained interest in Lawrence? More specifically, how has the focus of these works varied over the decades? What features of Lawrence 1 Michael Korda, Hero: The Life and Legend of Lawrence of Arabia (New York: HarperCollins, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinary Jerusalem 1840–1940
    Ordinary Jerusalem 1840–1940 Angelos Dalachanis and Vincent Lemire - 978-90-04-37574-1 Downloaded from Brill.com03/21/2019 10:36:34AM via free access Open Jerusalem Edited by Vincent Lemire (Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée University) and Angelos Dalachanis (French School at Athens) VOLUME 1 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/opje Angelos Dalachanis and Vincent Lemire - 978-90-04-37574-1 Downloaded from Brill.com03/21/2019 10:36:34AM via free access Ordinary Jerusalem 1840–1940 Opening New Archives, Revisiting a Global City Edited by Angelos Dalachanis and Vincent Lemire LEIDEN | BOSTON Angelos Dalachanis and Vincent Lemire - 978-90-04-37574-1 Downloaded from Brill.com03/21/2019 10:36:34AM via free access This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the prevailing CC-BY-NC-ND License at the time of publication, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited. The Open Jerusalem project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) (starting grant No 337895) Note for the cover image: Photograph of two women making Palestinian point lace seated outdoors on a balcony, with the Old City of Jerusalem in the background. American Colony School of Handicrafts, Jerusalem, Palestine, ca. 1930. G. Eric and Edith Matson Photograph Collection, Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/mamcol.054/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Dalachanis, Angelos, editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Reform in Jordan?
    Policy Paper Democratic Reform in Jordan? Calls for political reform in Jordan have come at a time when there is no popular political pressure or Expectations After the protest movement in the streets, as was the case during the Arab Spring, and - unexpectedly - after the parliamentary elections. King’s Recent Call to Review As a result, political elites have developed various theories to explain the timing of these Political Life calls and the hidden motives behind them. Of course, this also raises the usual questions about whether there was in fact a genuine and serious intent to move further towards a democratic transition, which seems to have stalled and perhaps even been reversed, Muhammad Abu Rumman with regard to Jordan’s ranking March 2021 for democratic institutions and international human rights. 1 Democratic Reform in Jordan? Expectations After the King’s Recent Call to Review Political Life Muhammad Abu Rumman March 2021 2 Published in 2021 by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Jordan & Iraq FES Jordan & Iraq P.O. Box 941876 Amman 11194 Jordan Email: [email protected] Website: www.fes-jordan.org Not for Sale © Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Resident Director: Tim O. Petschulat All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the publishers. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are solely those of the original author. They do not necessarily represent those of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. • Cover and internal design: Kamal Qasim Contents Contents Introduction 5 Historical Review: A Faltering Democracy 7 Determinants and Restrictions on Democratic Transition 10 Discussing Political Reform Today 14 Prospects for Political Transformation 17 Conclusion 19 Bibliography 21 4 Introduction 1 Introduction In an interview with the Jordan News Agency in the number of seats won by the Islamist on 30 January 2021, King Abdullah II spoke opposition, which makes up the largest about reviewing Jordanian laws governing political party in Jordan.
    [Show full text]
  • Edwards H. Metcalf Library Collection on TE Lawrence
    Edwards H. Metcalf Library Collection on T.E. Lawrence: Scrapbooks Huntington Library Scrapbook 1 Page Contents 1 recto [Blank]. 1 verso Anal. 1. Newspaper clipping. North, John, 'Hejaz railway brings back memories of Lawrence', Northern Echo, June 14, 1965. Anal. 2. Newspaper clipping. 'Memories of T.E.', Yorkshire Post, May 18, 1965. Mss. Note from Beaumont 'Please accept these free with my compliments. T.W. Beaumont'. 2 recto Black-and-white photograph of Beaumont. 'Thomas W. Beaumont Served under T.E. Lawrence in Arabia as his Sgt. Vickers Gunner'. 2 verso Black-and-white photograph. Mss. 'To my friend Theodora Duncan with every good wish. T.W. Beaumont' Typed note. ' Parents of Peter O'Toole with T.W. Beaumont At the gala opening of the film "Lawrence of Arabia", at the Majestic Theatre in Leeds, Yorkshire, Sunday evening, Oct. 13, 1963'. 3 recto Anal. 3. Newspaper clipping. 'A Lawrence Talks About That Legend', Leeds, Yorkshire, April 10, 1964. Two black-and-white photographs. 'Mr. T. W. Beaumont meets Dr. M.R. Lawrence elder brother of T.E. Lawrence, at Leeds City Station, Yorkshire. April 10, 1964. 3 verso Newspaper cartoon. 'Boy! I'm glad they don't use US nowadays!' Anal. 4. 'The following small photographs were taken during WW-I on the Eastern Front by T.W. Beaumont & friends, and smuggled out of Arabia. Newspaper cartoon. 'Arms for the love of Allah!' 4 recto Black-and-white photograph. 'Siwa Oasis, 1915-17 Involved in the defense of Suez. Operations against the Senussi in Lybian Desert. Photographed by C.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pro-Jerusalem Society and Ronald Storrs, 1917–1926
    chapter 20 “The Preservation and Safeguarding of the Amenities of the Holy City without Favour or Prejudice to Race or Creed”: The Pro-Jerusalem Society and Ronald Storrs, 1917–1926 Roberto Mazza The Beginnings in the Middle of Transition On September 6, 1918, twelve individuals met at the residence of the military governor of Jerusalem.1 The room was filled with tension as the governor was trying to win the confidence of those who were still skeptical and suspicious of British rule. A few months earlier, in December 1917, General Allenby had led the British troops into Jerusalem, ending Ottoman rule in the city and pav- ing the way for greater British success in the region. Though the conquest of Jerusalem proved to be a relatively easy military task, the control of the city required a larger set of skills. All aspects of the conquest and the takeover had been carefully planned in London. While Allenby’s military operations were unfolding in Palestine, the Foreign Office and War Office were discuss- ing the future asset of Jerusalem. Most of the policies adopted in relation to Jerusalem were a reflection of wartime agreements, including the Sykes–Picot Agreement and Balfour Declaration. British policy makers, starting with Mark Sykes, were aware of and sensitive to the tensions between the different reli- gious communities in Jerusalem. From the very early stages, the British aimed to avoid clashes between the Christians and Muslims, and among the different 1 Jerusalem Municipal Archives (JMA), 361, Pro-Jerusalem Society, Minutes, no. 1, Jerusalem, September 6, 1918. The twelve individuals were: Ronald Storrs, Ferdinando Diotallevi (Custos of the Custody of the Holy Land), Dr Eder (representative of the Jewish community), Father Ippolytos (representative of the Greek Orthodox Church), Kamil Effendi Husayni (Grand Mufti), Musa Kasim Pasha (president of the municipality), Bishop Kud (representative of the Armenian Orthodox Church), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Legacies of the Anglo-Hashemite Relationship in Jordan
    Legacies of the Anglo-Hashemite Relationship in Jordan: How this symbiotic alliance established the legitimacy and political longevity of the regime in the process of state-formation, 1914-1946 An Honors Thesis for the Department of Middle Eastern Studies Julie Murray Tufts University, 2018 Acknowledgements The writing of this thesis was not a unilateral effort, and I would be remiss not to acknowledge those who have helped me along the way. First of all, I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Thomas Abowd, for his encouragement of my academic curiosity this past year, and for all his help in first, making this project a reality, and second, shaping it into (what I hope is) a coherent and meaningful project. His class provided me with a new lens through which to examine political history, and gave me with the impetus to start this paper. I must also acknowledge the role my abroad experience played in shaping this thesis. It was a research project conducted with CET that sparked my interest in political stability in Jordan, so thank you to Ines and Dr. Saif, and of course, my classmates, Lensa, Matthew, and Jackie, for first empowering me to explore this topic. I would also like to thank my parents and my brother, Jonathan, for their continuous support. I feel so lucky to have such a caring family that has given me the opportunity to pursue my passions. Finally, a shout-out to the gals that have been my emotional bedrock and inspiration through this process: Annie, Maya, Miranda, Rachel – I love y’all; thanks for listening to me rant about this all year.
    [Show full text]
  • Then with the Civilian Administration up Until Britain Lence And
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF MichaelA.Earl-Taylor for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in History, Anthropology and English presented on May 30, 1989. Title:British Policies Towards Palestine 1917-1922. q. Abstract approved: ?A Ku Phi This study traces British government policies with regard to Palestine from the time the British Expedition- ary Forces under General Allenbyinvested Jerusalem in December 1917 to the imposition of the Mandatewith Britain as the Mandatory power, which came into effect on July 22,1922. The first chapter provides an historical introduction and examines the sequence of events leading to the Balfour Declaration of November 1917. The subsequent chapters deal with British policies during the MilitaryAdministration,which lasted from 1917-1920, and then with the Civilian Administration up until Britain formally assumed the Mandate of the Covenant ofthe League of Nations. Perhaps no policies ever pursued by successive British governments have been more fraught with ambiva- lence and contradiction than those of the Palestine mandate.British interests were defined not only by moral concerns with regard to the position of the Jewish people, but strategic considerations of Palestine and its geo- graphic location as a buffer zone to the lifeline of the empire--the Suez Canal.In this respect, the government of India, the source of the British military power in the Near East exerted as much, and sometimes more, influence over British Middle East policy as theForeign Office, and later, the Colonial Office combined. The inclusion of the Balfour Declaration in the Man- date placed the British government in an extraordinary and difficultposition.
    [Show full text]
  • T. E. Lawrence Papers: Finding Aid
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8bg2tr0 No online items T. E. Lawrence Papers: Finding Aid Finding aid prepared by Gayle M. Richardson, April 30, 2009. The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2129 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © 2009 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. T. E. Lawrence Papers: Finding mssTEL 1-1277 1 Aid Overview of the Collection Title: T. E. Lawrence Papers Dates (inclusive): 1894-2006 Bulk dates: 1911-2000 Collection Number: mssTEL 1-1277 Creator: Lawrence, T. E. (Thomas Edward), 1888-1935. Extent: 8,707 pieces. 86 boxes. Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens. Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2129 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: The collection consists of papers concerning British soldier and author T.E. Lawrence (1888-1935) including manuscripts (by and about Lawrence), correspondence (including over 150 letters by Lawrence), photographs, drawings, reproductions and ephemera. Also included in the collection is research material of various Lawrence collectors and scholars. Language: English. Access Open to qualified researchers by prior application through the Reader Services Department. For more information, contact Reader Services. Boxes 82-86 -- Coin & Fine Art, Manuscript & Rare Book Dealers. Restricted to staff use only. These boxes include provenance, price and sale information; please see Container List for an item-level list of contents. Publication Rights All photocopies, for which the Huntington does not own the original manuscript, may not be copied in any way, as noted in the Container List and on the folders.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Zionism to Asia: Texts and Tactics of Colonial Settlement, Formatted: Font: Bold
    14. <CN>14.</> <CT>Moving Zionism to Asia: Texts and Tactics of Colonial Settlement, Formatted: Font: Bold 1917–1921</> <AU>Elizabeth F. Thompsonn</> <CO>As a historian of the modern Middle East, I welcome Derek Penslar’s effort to “plac[e] Zionism in Asia.”1 First, he argues that Zionism as practiced in West Asia (Palestine) was not true settlement- colonialism, because settlers were not citizens of the colonial power ruling the territory (Britain). Then he turns to South Asia and to cultural analysis to argue that European Zionism shared similar roots and ideological values with Indian anti-colonial nationalism. On these bases, Penslar concludes that Zionists cannot be considered fully colonialist until after they founded the state State of Israel in 1948.</> My critique focuses on two related points. The first considers the argument’s key methodological pivot, Penslar’s distinction between practice and discourse, between sociology and history, and between sensibility and structure. His structural analysis of Zionism in Palestine remains distinct from his discourse analysis of Jewish nationalist writing in Europe. This spatial separation of method introduces critical distortions to Penslar’s presentation of Zionism in Palestine. If we look at what Zionists both said and did in Palestine before 1948, we find little European anti-colonialism and an intimate alliance of settlers with the British mandatory (colonial) state. My second point addresses the problematic limits to Penslar’s move of Zionism into West Asia. Colonialism is generally understood as a relationship; —that is, the institutionalization of practices that perpetuate the subordination of one people to another in a differentiated space.2 Penslar, however, neglects the other half of the Zionists’ encounter in 513 Palestine: the indigenous peoples, including Arabic-speaking Jews, Muslims, and Christians.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Preservation and Safeguarding of the Amenities of the Holy
    chapter 20 “The Preservation and Safeguarding of the Amenities of the Holy City without Favour or Prejudice to Race or Creed”: The Pro-Jerusalem Society and Ronald Storrs, 1917–1926 Roberto Mazza The Beginnings in the Middle of Transition On September 6, 1918, twelve individuals met at the residence of the military governor of Jerusalem.1 The room was filled with tension as the governor was trying to win the confidence of those who were still skeptical and suspicious of British rule. A few months earlier, in December 1917, General Allenby had led the British troops into Jerusalem, ending Ottoman rule in the city and pav- ing the way for greater British success in the region. Though the conquest of Jerusalem proved to be a relatively easy military task, the control of the city required a larger set of skills. All aspects of the conquest and the takeover had been carefully planned in London. While Allenby’s military operations were unfolding in Palestine, the Foreign Office and War Office were discuss- ing the future asset of Jerusalem. Most of the policies adopted in relation to Jerusalem were a reflection of wartime agreements, including the Sykes–Picot Agreement and Balfour Declaration. British policy makers, starting with Mark Sykes, were aware of and sensitive to the tensions between the different reli- gious communities in Jerusalem. From the very early stages, the British aimed to avoid clashes between the Christians and Muslims, and among the different 1 Jerusalem Municipal Archives (JMA), 361, Pro-Jerusalem Society, Minutes, no. 1, Jerusalem, September 6, 1918. The twelve individuals were: Ronald Storrs, Ferdinando Diotallevi (Custos of the Custody of the Holy Land), Dr Eder (representative of the Jewish community), Father Ippolytos (representative of the Greek Orthodox Church), Kamil Effendi Husayni (Grand Mufti), Musa Kasim Pasha (president of the municipality), Bishop Kud (representative of the Armenian Orthodox Church), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hejaz: the First Postage Stamps of 1916 and T E Lawrence
    Final version. 16.9.05 Hejaz: The First Postage Stamps of 1916 and T E Lawrence. David R Beech FRPSL Hejaz, more correctly spelt Hijaz, is a region in the Arabian Peninsular that includes both the Red Sea littoral and the holy Islamic cities of Mecca and Medina. It had been part of the Turkish Ottoman Empire since 1517. In 1845 the Ottomans strengthened their influence by taking greater control from the local chiefs. To consolidate the position further, and to facilitate the journey for pilgrims, a railway, known as the Hijaz Railway, was built between 1900 and 1908 from Damascus to Medina. On 5th November 1914 Great Britain declared war on the Ottoman Empire which had joined the First World War on the same side as Germany. Arab Revolt against the Turks would benefit British interests and a secret agreement of 23rd October 1914 for support was made with the Sherif of Mecca in Hijaz. On 7th June 1916 Hijaz proclaimed independence, on 10th June its forces occupied Mecca, and on 27th June Hijaz declared war on Turkey. Also on 27th June Husayn [or Hussein as quoted below] ibn ‘Ali, Grand Emir and Sherif of Mecca (c1854-1931), who had been appointed to his office by the Turks in 1908, further declared independence of Ottoman rule and on 29th October was proclaimed King of the Hijaz. Into the story enters T E Lawrence, “Lawrence of Arabia” (1888-1935) in the company of Ronald (later Sir Ronald) Storrs (1881-1955), Oriental Secretary at the Arab Bureau and later High Commission, in Cairo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arab States and the Palestine Conflict
    The Arab States and the Palestine Conflict Contemporary Issues in the Middle East The Arab States and the Palestine Conflict BARRY RUBIN Syracuse University Press Copyright © 1981 by Barry Rubin First Published 1981 All Rights Reserved First Edition 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 6 5 4 3 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Rubin, Barry M. The Arab states and the Palestine conflict. (Contemporary issues in the Middle East) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Jewish-Arab relations —1917- .2. Arab coun tries—Politics and government. I. Title. II. Series. DS119.7.R75 327.5694017’4927 81-5829 ISBN 0-8156-2253-8 AACR2 ISBN 8-8156-0170-0 (pbk.) Manufactured in the United States of America “Interest of State is the main motive of Middle East Governments as of others, and here as elsewhere the idea of interest which determines policy is a blend of two elements: a certain concept of what is good for the State as a whole, and a concept of what is good for the rulers and the group which they immediately represent.” Albert Hourani, The Middle East and the Crisis of 1956 “All my friends ... Have but their stings and teeth newly ta’en out By whose fell working I was first advanced And by whose power I well might lodge a fear To be again displaced; which to avoid... Be it thy course to busy giddy minds With foreign quarrels....” William Shakespeare, King Henry IV, Part Two Contents Preface ………………………………………………………ix Introduction …………………………………………………xi 1. The Bitter Legacy of Defeat: 1948-81 ……………………… 1 2.
    [Show full text]