DOCSLIB.ORG

Overview of Ftc Actions in Pharmaceutical Products and Distribution*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Overview of Ftc Actions in Pharmaceutical Products and Distribution* OVERVIEW OF FTC ACTIONS IN PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS AND DISTRIBUTION* Health Care Division Bureau of Competition Federal Trade Commission Washington D.C. 20580 Markus H. Meier Assistant Director Bradley S. Albert Deputy Assistant Director Kara Monahan Deputy Assistant Director June 2019 * Actions involving health care services and products are contained in a separate document, Overview of FTC Actions in Health Care Services and Products. Information about advisory opinions in the health care and pharmaceutical sectors is contained in the document Topic and Yearly Indices of Health Care Antitrust Advisory Opinions by Commission and by Staff. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 II. CONDUCT INVOLVING PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS .......................................3 A. Monopolization ........................................................................................................3 B. Agreements Not to Compete ..................................................................................14 III. CONDUCT INVOLVING PHARMACEUTICAL DISTRIBUTION ..............................19 A. Monopolization ......................................................................................................19 B. Agreements on Price and Price-Related Terms .....................................................20 C. Agreements to Obstruct Innovative Forms of Health Care Delivery or Financing................................................................................................................26 IV. MERGERS INVOLVING PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS .....................................26 A. Horizontal Mergers between Direct Competitors ..................................................26 B. Potential Competition Mergers ..............................................................................61 C. Innovation Market Mergers ...................................................................................68 V. MERGERS INVOLVING PHARMACEUTICAL DISTRIBUTION ..............................70 A. Horizontal Mergers between Direct Competitors ..................................................70 B. Vertical Mergers ....................................................................................................75 VI. INDUSTRY GUIDANCE STATEMENTS INVOLVING PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS AND DISTRIBUTION ................................................................................75 A. Advisory Opinions .................................................................................................75 B. Citizen Petition to the Food and Drug Administration ..........................................76 C. FTC Amendments to the Premerger Notification Rules Related to the Transfer of Exclusive Patent Rights in the Pharmaceutical Industry ....................76 D. 2004 Report: Improving Health Care: A Dose of Competition .............................77 VII. AMICUS BRIEFS INVOLVING PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS AND DISTRIBUTION................................................................................................................77 A. Reverse Payment ....................................................................................................77 B. Product Hopping ....................................................................................................83 C. Restricted Distribution/REMS ...............................................................................84 i D. Patent Issues ...........................................................................................................85 E. Noerr-Pennington Doctrine ....................................................................................87 F. Regulatory Issues ...................................................................................................88 VIII. INDEX - TABLE OF CASES AND BRIEFS ...................................................................89 ii FTC ACTIONS IN PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS AND DISTRIBUTION1 I. INTRODUCTION The Federal Trade Commission is a law enforcement agency charged by Congress with protecting the public against anticompetitive behavior and deceptive and unfair trade practices. The FTC’s antitrust arm, the Bureau of Competition, is responsible for investigating and prosecuting “unfair methods of competition” which violate the FTC Act. The FTC shares with the Department of Justice responsibility for prosecuting violations of the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act. When litigation becomes necessary, the FTC may conduct an administrative adjudication before an FTC Administrative Law Judge. This provides the opportunity for matters raising complex legal and economic issues to be heard, in the first instance, in a forum specially suited for dealing with such matters. Appeals from Commission decisions are taken directly to the federal courts of appeal. The Commission also has the authority under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act to seek a preliminary injunction in federal district court whenever the Commission has reason to believe that a party is violating, or is about to violate, any provision of law enforced by the FTC. Such preliminary injunctions are intended to preserve the status quo, or to prevent further consumer harm, pending administrative adjudication before the Commission. Additionally, the Commission has the authority to seek a permanent injunction in federal district court in a “proper case” pursuant to section 13(b) of the FTC Act. In the mid-1970's, the FTC formed a division within the Bureau of Competition to investigate potential antitrust violations involving health care. The Health Care Division consists of approximately 40 lawyers and investigators who work exclusively on health care antitrust matters, including non-merger matters involving the pharmaceutical industry. The Mergers I Division investigates mergers involving pharmaceutical products. FTC actions involving pharmaceutical products and distribution2 are summarized below.3 The summaries are intended to provide a brief overview of FTC enforcement actions. They do not reflect all subsequent actions taken by the Commission or the parties. The Commission and its staff have also 1 This summary has been prepared by the FTC Health Care Division staff, and has not been reviewed or approved by the Commission or the Bureau of Competition. Section IV describes FTC enforcement involving mergers in the pharmaceutical industry, which are primarily conducted by the Mergers I Division of the Bureau of Competition. 2 Actions involving health care services and products are contained in a separate document, Overview of FTC Actions in Health Care Services and Products, https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/industry- guidance/health-care. 3 Commission complaints and orders issued since March 1996 are available at the FTC’s website at http://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/industry-guidance/health-care (under the “Cases” drop down menu). 1 responded to numerous requests for guidance from health care industry participants through, among other things, the advisory opinion letter process.4 For further information about matters handled by the FTC’s Health Care Division, or to lodge complaints about suspected antitrust violations, please write, call, e-mail,5 or fax this office as follows: Mailing Address: Health Care Division Bureau of Competition Federal Trade Commission Washington, DC 20580 Telephone Number: (202)-326-3759, (202)-326-3670, or (202)-326-2018 E-Mail: [email protected] Fax Number: (202)-326-3384 For further information about pharmaceutical mergers handled by the FTC’s Mergers I Division, please write, call, e-mail, or fax the Mergers I Division as follows: Mailing Address: Mergers I Division Bureau of Competition Federal Trade Commission Washington, DC 20580 Telephone Number: (202)-326-3106, (202)-326-3506, or (202)-326-2118 E-Mail: [email protected] Fax Number: (202)-326-2655 4 Information regarding advisory opinions is set forth in the Topic and Yearly Indices of Health Care Advisory Opinions by Commission and by Staff. The indices, the advisory opinions, and other information relating to the Commission’s advisory opinion program are also available at the FTC’s website at http://www.ftc.gov/tips- advice/competition-guidance/industry-guidance/health-care. 5 Note that e-mail is not secure. Confidential information should be marked “Confidential” and sent via regular mail. To learn how we may use the information you provide, please read our Privacy Policy. 2 II. CONDUCT INVOLVING PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS A. Monopolization Federal Trade Commission v. Shire ViroPharma Inc., Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00131-RGA (D. Del.), FTC File No. 1210062 (complaint filed February 7, 2017) (https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/121-0062/shire-viropharma). The complaint alleged that Shire ViroPharma Inc. (“ViroPharma”) abused government processes to delay generic competition to its branded Vancocin Capsules. Vancocin Capsules are used to treat a potentially life-threatening gastrointestinal infection. Specifically, the complaint alleged that ViroPharma waged a campaign of serial, repetitive, and unsupported filings with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and courts to delay the FDA’s approval of generic Vancocin Capsules and competition to its drug product. ViroPharma submitted 43 filings with the FDA and filed three lawsuits against the FDA between 2006 and 2012. According to the complaint, ViroPharma’s filings lacked supporting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix a 2016 Financial Report Financial Review Pfizer Inc
    Appendix A 2016 Financial Report Financial Review Pfizer Inc. and Subsidiary Companies GLOSSARY OF DEFINED TERMS Unless the context requires otherwise, references to “Pfizer,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” in this 2016 Financial Report (defined below) refer to Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiaries. We also have used several other terms in this 2016 Financial Report, most of which are explained or defined below: 2016 Financial Report This Financial Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, which was filed as Exhibit 13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 2016 Form 10-K Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 AAV Adeno-Associated Virus ABO Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation ACA (Also referred to as U.S. U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Healthcare Legislation) Act. ACIP Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ALK anaplastic lymphoma kinase Allergan Allergan plc Alliance revenues Revenues from alliance agreements under which we co-promote products discovered or developed by other companies or us AM-Pharma AM-Pharma B.V. Anacor Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Astellas Astellas Pharma U.S. Inc. ASU Accounting Standards Update ATM-AVI aztreonam-avibactam Bamboo Bamboo Therapeutics, Inc. Baxter Baxter International Inc. BMS Bristol-Myers Squibb Company CDC U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cellectis Cellectis SA Celltrion Celltrion Inc. and Celltrion Healthcare,
    [Show full text]
  • From the Academy
    FROM THE ACADEMY Joint American Academy of DermatologyeNational Psoriasis Foundation guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with phototherapy Craig A. Elmets, MD (Co-Chair),a HenryW.Lim,MD,b Benjamin Stoff, MD, MA,c Cody Connor, MD,a Kelly M. Cordoro, MD,d Mark Lebwohl, MD,e AprilW.Armstrong,MD,MPH,f Dawn M. R. Davis, MD,g Boni E. Elewski, MD,a Joel M. Gelfand, MD, MSCE,h Kenneth B. Gordon, MD,i AliceB.Gottlieb,MD,PhD,j Daniel H. Kaplan, MD, PhD,k Arthur Kavanaugh, MD,l Matthew Kiselica, BA/BS,m Dario Kivelevitch, MD,n Neil J. Korman, MD, PhD,o Daniela Kroshinsky, MD, MPH,p Craig L. Leonardi, MD,q Jason Lichten, MD,m NehalN.Mehta,MD,MSCE,r Amy S. Paller, MD,s Sylvia L. Parra, MD,t Arun L. Pathy, MD,u Elizabeth A. Farley Prater, MD,v Reena N. Rupani, MD,e Michael Siegel, PhD,m BruceE.Strober,MD,PhD,w,x Emily B. Wong, MD,y Jashin J. Wu, MD,z Vidhya Hariharan, PhD,aa and Alan Menter, MD (Co-Chair)n Birmingham, Alabama; Detroit, Michigan; Atlanta, Georgia; San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, and Irvine, California; New York, New York; Rochester, Minnesota; Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, Pennsylva- nia; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Portland, Oregon; Dallas and San Antonio, Texas; Cleveland, Ohio; Boston, Massachusetts; St. Louis, Missouri; Bethesda, Maryland; Chicago and Rosemont, Illinois; Sumter, South Carolina; Centennial, Colorado; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Farmington, Connecticut; and Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease involving multiple organ systems and affecting approximately 3.2% of the world’s population.
    [Show full text]
  • [Docket No. FDA-2017-N-3203] Wyeth Pharmaceutical
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/21/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-12908, and on FDsys.gov 4164-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA-2017-N-3203] Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of 121 New Drug Applications and 161 Abbreviated New Drug Applications AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is withdrawing approval of 121 new drug applications (NDAs) and 161 abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) from multiple applicants. The holders of the applications notified the Agency in writing that the drug products were no longer marketed and requested that the approval of the applications be withdrawn. DATES: The withdrawal is effective on [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Florine P. Purdie, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6248, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3601. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The holders of the applications listed in table 1 in this document have informed FDA that these drug products are no longer marketed and have requested that FDA withdraw approval of the applications under the process in § 314.150(c) (21 CFR 314.150(c)). The applicants have also, by their requests, waived their opportunity for a hearing. Withdrawal of approval of an application or abbreviated application under § 314.150(c) is without prejudice to refiling. 2 Table 1 Application No.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Valeant's Fall
    March 29, 2017 ROB MAGAZINE Inside Valeant’s fall How an analyst, a hedge fund manager and a journalist exposed the fatal flaws in CEO Michael Pearson’s strategy and ended a drug-fuelled capital markets rampage CHARLES WILLIAMS BRUCE LIVESEY SPECIAL TO THE GLOBE AND MAILLAST UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, MAR. 29, 2017 9:49AM EDT U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren is renowned for pillorying captains of industry when the opportunity presents itself. Such an occasion arose one cool, overcast day in April of last year, when J. Michael Pearson sat in front of a group of senators in a wood-panelled chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. As the recently fired (but still acting) CEO of Laval, Quebec-based Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc., Pearson was appearing before the Senate’s Special Committee on Aging to answer for Valeant’s penchant for jacking up drug prices to unholy levels. The room was packed with aides, reporters and anxious businesspeople. Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts, is a former Harvard law professor with a rapier intelligence and a willingness to be blunt. At one point she drilled down on Valeant’s use of “patient assistance programs.” Warren felt that such programs—which typically cover some or all of a patient’s co-payment—were a cunning way to keep consumers using overpriced drugs after the company hiked prices. “What is the return to Valeant on the money that you’re currently putting into the patient assistance program?” Warren demanded pointedly. Pearson, a fleshy 57-year-old with grey hair and a long puffy face, was looking rather whipped despite his natty charcoal suit and burgundy tie.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on Annual Reports 2016
    ANNUAL REPORT ON ANNUAL REPORTS 2016 TOP 400 ANNUAL REPORTS WHO RANKS WHERE? 100 ANNUALS IN BRIEF BEST REPORTING PRACTICES Company Value > Report Value Annual Report on Annual Reports 2016 Contents Report rating scale 3 Top 400 annual reports 4 Who ranks where? 25 From ABB to ZTE 100 annuals in brief 58 From Abbott to Yamaha How important is the annual report today? 92 Views from Cecilia Ketels, Kellie Friery, Renee Carter, David Robinson, Kaevan Gazdar, Elena Moskvina, Thomas Rosenmayr, Rob Stangroom, Andrey Kozhevnikov, Ana Santamarina, Katie Holcomb, Ananda Jagoda Best practices on key report attibutes 100 Strategy, message, investor information, risks, style, online… How we make it 121 How is your report doing? The report scan 127 The report rating panel 128 Robert Berick, Susan Blesener, Renee Carter, Vero Escarmelle, Helena Fournial, Kaevan Gazdar, Mike Guillaume, Pradip Seth, Eva Wolosiuk Making reports pay off 133 e.com – ReportWatch 135 2 Report rating scale A+ ééééé First-rate A éééé(é) Excellent A- éééé Very good B+ ééé(é) Sound B ééé Average B- éé(é) Uneven C+ éé Common C é(é) Substandard C- é Poor D (é) Uncompetitive 3 Top 400 annual reports AkzoNobel (No. 1) Electrolux (No. 2 ) SCA (No. 3) Volvo (No. 4) 4 Report rank Company Country Report rating Compare 1 AKZONOBEL Netherlands A+ DUPONT 2 ELECTROLUX Sweden A+ WHIRLPOOL 3 SCA Sweden A+ KIMBERLY-CLARK 4 VOLVO Sweden A+ DAIMLER 5 POTASHCORP Canada A+ AGRIUM 6 ATLAS COPCO Sweden A SANDVIK 7 STORA ENSO Finland A UPM 8 BOLIDEN Sweden A GLENCORE 9 WIENERBERGER Austria A BORAL 10
    [Show full text]
  • 05/01/02 Louisiana Medicaid Management
    APPENDIX C 05/01/02 LOUISIANA MEDICAID MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE 1 DEPT OF HEALTH AND HOSPITALS - BUREAU OF HEALTH SERVICES FINANCING LOUISIANA MEDICAID PHARMACY BENEFITS MANAGEMENT UNIT ONLY THESE COMPANIES PRODUCTS ARE COVERED AND ONLY THOSE DOSAGE FORMS LISTED IN APPENDIX A. MEDICAID DRUG FEDERAL REBATE PARTICIPATING PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES LABELER PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY EFFECTIVE END DATE CODE DATE 00002 ELI LILLY & CO 04/01/91 00003 E.R.SQUIBB & SONS,INC 04/01/91 00004 HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE,INC 04/01/91 00005 LEDERLE LABORATORIES AMERICAN CYANAMID 04/01/91 00006 MERCK SHARP & DOHME 04/01/91 00007 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 04/01/91 00008 WYETH LABORATORIES 04/01/91 00009 THE UPJOHN COMPANY 04/01/91 00011 BECTON DICKINSON MICROBIOLOGY SYSTEMS 10/01/91 07/01/98 00013 ADRIA LABORATORIES DIV.OF ERBAMONT,INC 04/01/91 00014 G.D.SEARLE & CO 04/01/91 01/01/01 00015 MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY 04/01/91 00016 KABI PHARMACIA 04/01/91 00021 REED & CARNRICK 10/01/96 01/01/97 00023 ALLERGAN,INC 04/01/91 00024 WINTHROP PHARMACEUTICALS 04/01/91 00025 G.D.SEARLE & CO 04/01/91 00026 MILES INC.,PHARMACEUTICAL DIVISION 04/01/91 00028 GEIGY PHARMACEUTICALS 04/01/91 00029 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 04/01/91 00031 ROBINS,A.H. 04/01/91 00032 SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS 04/01/91 00033 SYNTEX 04/01/91 00034 THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY 04/01/91 00037 CARTER-WALLACE,INC 04/01/91 00038 STUART PHARMACEUTICALS,ICI AMERICAS INC 04/01/91 07/01/01 00039 HOECHST-ROUSSEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC 04/01/91 00043 SANDOZ CONSUMER CORPORATION 04/01/91 00044 KNOLL PHARMACEUTICALS
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Ftc Antitrust Actions in Pharmaceutical Services and Products
    OVERVIEW OF FTC ANTITRUST ACTIONS IN PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES AND PRODUCTS Health Care Division Bureau of Competition Federal Trade Commission Washington D.C. 20580 Markus H. Meier Assistant Director Bradley S. Albert Deputy Assistant Director Saralisa C. Brau Deputy Assistant Director September 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION. ........................................................... 1 II. CONDUCT INVOLVING PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES AND PRODUCTS. 3 A. Monopolization. ...................................................... 3 B. Agreements Not to Compete. ............................................ 8 C. Agreements on Price or Price-Related Terms. 14 D. Agreements to Obstruct Innovative Forms of Health Care Delivery or Financing. 20 E. Illegal Tying and Other Arrangements. .................................... 20 III. PHARMACEUTICAL MERGERS. ........................................... 20 A. Horizontal Mergers Between Direct Competitors. 20 B. Potential Competition Mergers. ......................................... 44 C. Innovation Market Mergers. ............................................ 47 D. Vertical Mergers...................................................... 49 IV. INDUSTRY GUIDANCE STATEMENTS...................................... 50 A. Advisory Opinions. ................................................... 50 B. Citizen Petition to the Food and Drug Administration. 51 V. AMICUS BRIEFS. ......................................................... 51 VI. INDICES. ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Access Tobacco Enforcement Program Annual Report 04-05
    Youth Access Tobacco Enforcement Program Annual Report October 1, 2004 - September 30, 2005 � TobaccoSales To Youth New York State Department of Health Questions or requests for additional copies of this report: New York State Department of Health Bureau of Community Environmental Health & Food Protection Tobacco Enforcement Program Flanigan Square, Room 515 547 River Street Troy, NY 12180-2216 Telephone: (518) 402-7600 or 1 (800) 458-1158, ext. 27600 Fax: (518) 402-7609 This annual report of the New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH) Youth Access Tobacco Enforcement Program is prepared in accordance with Section 1399-kk of the Public Health law and is submitted by the Commissioner of Health to the Governor and the Legislature. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks go to the local health department enforcement officers, the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs and the youth who participated in the access compliance check surveillance initiative. Staff of the New York State Department of Health’s Bureau of Community Environmental Health and Food Protection Tobacco Enforcement Program prepared this report with data provided from the local enforcement officers, other State agencies and programs within the Department of Health. The New York State Department of Health’s Tobacco Control Program and the New York State Education Department supplied information regarding tobacco use and trends among minors. The State Department of Taxation and Finance provided registration and revenue data. The Department of State’s Office of Fire Prevention
    [Show full text]
  • PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS for the THIRD CIRCUIT ___Nos. 14-4202, 14-4203, 14-4204, 14-4205, 14-4206, 14-46
    Case: 14-4203 Document: 003112598145 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2017 PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______ Nos. 14-4202, 14-4203, 14-4204, 14-4205, 14-4206, 14-4602 & 14-4632 ______ IN RE: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION Rite Aid Corporation; Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corporation; JC (PJC) USA, LLC; Maxi Drug, Inc. d/b/a Brooks Pharmacy; Eckerd Corporation, Appellants in No. 14-4202 Walgreen Company; The Kroger Co.; Safeway, Inc.; Supervalu, Inc.; HEB Grocery Company L.P., Appellants in No. 14-4203 Giant Eagle, Inc., Appellant in No. 14-4204 Meijer, Inc.; Meijer Distribution, Inc., Appellants in No. 14-4205 Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.; Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a SAJ Distributors; Burlington Drug Company, Inc.; Value Drug Company; Professional Drug Company, Inc.; American Sales Company LLC, Appellants in No. 14-4206 Case: 14-4203 Document: 003112598145 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2017 A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan; Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Maryland; New Mexico United Food and Commercial Workers Union’s and Employers’ Health and Welfare Trust Fund; Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company, d/b/a Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Louisiana; Bakers Local 433 Health Fund; Twin Cities Bakery Workers Health and Welfare Fund; Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98; New York Hotel Trades Counsel & Hotel Association of New York City, Inc., Health Benefits Fund; Edward Czarnecki; Emilie Heinle; Frank Palter; Andrew Livezey; Edward Ellenson; Jean Ellyne Dougan; Nancy Billington, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants in No.
    [Show full text]
  • Biotechnology and the Economics of Discovery in the Pharmaceutical Industry
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND THE ECONOMICS OF DISCOVERY IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY HELEN SIMPSON Office of Health Economics 12 Whitehall London SWlA 2DY ©October 1998. Office of Health Economics. Price £7.50 ISBN 1 899040 60 9 Printed by BSC Print Ltd, London. About the Author Helen Simpson is currently a researc~ economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies and was formerly an economist at the Department of Trade and Industry. However, the opinions expressed here are her own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IFS or of DTI officials or ministers. Acknowledgements This paper has been developed from my MPhil Economics thesis Scientist Entrepreneurs and the Finance of Biotech Companies. I would like to thank Margaret Meyer, Paul David and Gervas Huxley for their valuable suggestions. I am particularly grateful to Hannah Kettler and Jon Sussex for their advice and editorial inputs to the paper. My thanks also go to Adrian Towse and members of the OHE Editorial Board for their comments, and to the following individuals who gave me their insights into the pharmaceutical industry: Dr Trevor Jones, Director General, ABPI; Dr Janet Dewdney, Chairman, Adprotech; Dr Clive Halliday, Head of Global External Scientific Affairs, Glaxo Wellcome; Mr Alan Galloway, Head of Research Administration, Dr Nick Scott-Ram, Director of Corporate Affairs, and Dr Philip Huxley, all of British Biotech; Christine Soden, Finance Director, Chiroscience; Ian Smith, Lehman Brothers Pharmaceutical Research; and Paul Murray, 31. The Office of Health Economics Terms of Reference The Office of Health Economics (OHE) was founded in 1962. Its terms of reference are to: • commission and undertake research on the economics of health and health care; • collect and analyse health and health care data from the UK and other countries; • disseminate the results of this work and stimulate discussion of them and their policy implications.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Title Subject Area American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy : AJHP Medicine -- Pharmacy and Materia Medica A.I.H.P
    Journal Title Subject Area American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy : AJHP Medicine -- Pharmacy and materia medica A.I.H.P. Notes Medicine -- Pharmacy and materia medica aaiPharma, Inc. SWOT analysis Medicine -- Therapeutics. Pharmacology AAPS journal Medicine -- Pharmacy and materia medica AAPS pharmscitech Medicine -- Pharmacy and materia medica Abbott laboratories SWOT analysis Medicine -- Therapeutics. Pharmacology Abgenix, Inc. SWOT analysis Medicine -- Therapeutics. Pharmacology Able laboratories SWOT analysis Medicine -- Therapeutics. Pharmacology Academic Pharmacy Now Medicine -- Pharmacy and materia medica Accredo Health, Inc. SWOT Analysis Medicine -- Therapeutics. Pharmacology ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters Medicine -- Pharmacy and materia medica Acta Facultatis Pharmaceuticae Universitatis Comenianae Medicine -- Pharmacy and materia medica Acta Pharmaceutica Medicine -- Pharmacy and materia medica Acta Pharmacologica Sinica Medicine -- Therapeutics. Pharmacology Medicine -- Therapeutics. Pharmacology -- Physical Acta Radiologica Short Reports medicine. Physical therapy Actu Labo Medicine -- Pharmacy and materia medica Medicine -- Therapeutics. Pharmacology -- Other Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research therapeutic procedures Acupuncture in Medicine Medicine -- Therapeutics. Pharmacology Acupuncture: Review and Analysis of Reports on Controlled Clinical Trials Medicine -- Therapeutics. Pharmacology Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics Medicine -- Therapeutics. Pharmacology AdvancePCS, Inc. SWOT Analysis Medicine
    [Show full text]
  • 9155 Biovail Q1 Prepress
    Q1 First Quarter Report Biovail Corporation 2001 Interim Report Dear fellow shareholders: I am pleased to report that Biovail has started the year 2001 with record first quarter financial results. These results reflect a major product line acquisition along with a number of additional milestones as the Company continues to evolve into a major fully-integrated North American pharmaceutical operation. Cardizem® acquisition At the beginning of the quarter, Biovail acquired the North American rights to the entire Cardizem® line of diltiazem products from Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. Cardizem® is a market leading brand of calcium channel blockers for the treatment of hypertension and angina. Total U.S. sales of calcium channel blockers in 2000 exceeded $3.5 billion. Cardizem® CD was the best selling diltiazem product in the U.S. last year with over 13 million prescriptions. Other products in the line include Cardizem®, Cardizem® SR and Cardizem® injectables. The acquisition of this significant product line is expected to add over $150 million in incremental revenue in 2001. The acquisition of the Cardizem® line also allows Biovail to add value to its new improved once-daily diltiazem product, currently undergoing studies to support superior marketing claims. This new product, which has already received FDA approval, will likely be launched as Cardizem® XL. This new product will offer measurable therapeutic advantages. Biovail expects to launch Cardizem® XL mid 2002. U.S. sales operations The integration of DJ Pharma, the U.S. sales operation acquired by Biovail in 2000, was completed during the quarter. The Company’s new U.S. sales operation, renamed Biovail Pharmaceuticals, will be based in Raleigh, North Carolina.
    [Show full text]