Short Notes BULLETIN of the GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Short Notes BULLETIN of the GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF Short Notes BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL 70. PP. 107-110. 1 FIG. JANUARY 1959 FAl.'LTEl) KINDLE (MISSISSIPPIAX) SECTION AT CROWSNEST PASS, ALBERTA, CAXADA BY SAMUEL J. NELSON The abnormally thick carbonate section of that complex folding was the cause of the ex- the Rundle group at Crowsnest Pass, Alberta, traordinary thickness. Warren (1928; 1933) and has interested geologists for many years. The McKay (1932) thought that their measured Rundle here attains an apparent thickness of thicknesses of between 5000 and 5300 feet were more than 5000 feet in contrast to near-by sec- caused by deposition and not structural com- tions most of which are less than 3000 feet. plications. Cundill (1955) concluded, from Although no obvious faults occur in this sec- lithologic studies, that the succession was re- tion, some geologists attribute the thickness to peated by three faults and possibly a fourth, repetition, while others consider basinal deposi- and indicated that the true stratigraphic thick- tion as the answer. J. R. Cundill (1955) out- ness is about 2700 feet.1 The section was lined stratigraphic evidence illustrating fault- recently briefly referred to by Bostock, Mulli- ing in the section, and the writer here presents gan, and Douglas (1957), who stated that the paleontologic evidence in support of Cundill's maximum thickness is 3900 feet. Faulting was interpretation. not mentioned. The section discussed is exposed on the north In 1955 the writer with J. R. Cundill and side of Crowsnest Lake at Crowsnest Pass in two assistants spent 10 days making detailed the southern Canadian Rockies immediately fossil collections from the section. A study of east of the Alberta-British Columbia boundary. faunas has shown that Cundill's three main The Rundle here is a westward-dipping, super- faults are probably correct, and that the fourth ficially undisturbed sequence of carbonates which he tentatively proposed is also present. underlain on the east by the Banff and overlain Faunal evidence indicates that the stratigraphic on the west by the Rocky Mountain formation. thickness of the Rundle is between 2900 and The Rundle group at Crowsnest Pass, as in 3000 feet (Fig. 1). Thus Cundill's excellent most areas of the southern Canadian Rockies, stratigraphic analysis is confirmed by paleon- can be divided into three formations which, tology. in ascending order, are the Livingstone, Mount The writer wishes to express his gratitude to Head, and Etherington. In other areas these officials of The British American Oil Company, three formations generally aggregate between Ltd., Calgary, for financial backing of this 2000 and 3000 feet: the Livingstone (1000- project. Dr. P. S. Warren, of the University of 1500 feet), of resistant light-colored crinoidal limestones and interbedded finer-grained car- 1 bonates, of Osagean age; the Mount Head Cundill placed only the Livingstone and Mount Head formations in the Rundle group and stated (600 feet), a recessive unit of Meramecian age that their combined stratigraphic thickness was consisting of dark limestone, dolomite, and about 2100 feet. If the Etherington (his Tunnel shaly beds; and the Chesterian Etherington Mountain formation) is included in the group formation (700 feet or less) of resistant light- then the above figure of 2700 feet is obtained. Some confusion has been caused by the fact that weathering dolomites and limestones. The his diagram shows a total thickness of 2750 feet reader is referred to Warren (1927), Beales for the Livingstone and Mount Head in contrast (1950), Douglas (1953), Xorris (1957), and to the stated figure of 2100 feet. Cundill (Personal Bostock, Mulligan, and Douglas (1957) for communication) mentioned that the latter figure was derived by assuming an arbitrary value for details of Rundle stratigraphy. repetition on the fourth fault. Faunal evidence Dawson (1886), who made the first reference (Fig. 1) suggests that the figure is closer to 2300 to the Rundle of Crowsnest Pass, considered feet. 107 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/70/1/107/3416688/i0016-7606-70-1-107.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 O OC TUNNEL MOUNTAIN MOUNT RAE CROW5NEST PASS SECTION MI Volley Ar*a HionwoodPasS Approxirri_ahe Sj-raHjrapliie PosiHon lanff Alb«rhi Hiqhwood River Area Fault Slice Fault ^ic« 4. E. 1415.16 1713 . ^oo |_j^^^. ^gul^ Slke I. Foull-5!i«2 -B I,M.S.6.7 Foulf Slice 5 18 Q:lfracl0,futpa'Mf(Mt*tl) 17 tinop'oJuttulovafal (Mall) E 16 OrHcfftejleaikaifrerw'f MtChoney a 15. Sf Wfe /./oj-/1 NomogJ ( P.oHtn. t- Cjwollow) w D 15. Littorfrohonan-tefum (CMckmay) II12. Dtc/ytx/oifurFchmocanchu* f-enuicostus histi-ia^s (Hall!) C. 10 Producfel/a indioneniis (Hall) I Rocky Mountain. 6. Gitfye//a lutgifJo (Hall) r~7^7| f^erin^on 53 Mounf- Head T Expo^ursi pot j or lacking formafio Banff -3 formation FIGURE 1.—CORRELATION OF THK RUNDLE GROUP (MISSISSIPPIAN) OF CROWSNEST PASS, ALBERTA Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/70/1/107/3416688/i0016-7606-70-1-107.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 SHORT NOTES 109 Alberta, has guided the writer through most useful for local mapping. The stratigraphic phases of this study. position of the Crowsnest Pass L. arizelum with Figure 1 shows the stratigraphic correlation respect to assemblage C suggests that the of the fault slices diagnosed for the Rundle containing strata probably correlate with limestone of Crowsnest Lake with two well- uppermost rather than lowermost Mount Head. known sections in Alberta—Mount Rae (Storm An interval of about 500 feet separates assem- Creek), about 65 miles north of the Pass, and blages D and E, while in other nearby sections Tunnel Mountain, 45 miles farther northwest. this interval is 140-200 feet. Thus the enlarged Footages for the last section are those of Beales interval suggests repetition by faulting. No (1950); those of Mount Rae are the writer's. diagnostic fossils occur above assemblage E, Portions of sections not pertinent to this dis- but the 400-foot section between K and the cussion are omitted; their deletion is indicated base ol the Rocky Mountain formation is simi- by jagged lines on columnar sections in the lar to that of normal sections and suggests that figure. faulting is absent. Lithologic divisions and footages of the Crowsnest Pass Rundle (Fig. 1) are those of Cundill (1955). The base of the Mount Head REFERENCES CITED formation in this paper has been raised 200 feet Beales, F. VV., 1950, The Late Palaeozoic forma- above that of Cundill so that the lithologies tions of southwestern Alberta: Geol. Survey conform more closely with the formation at Canada Paper 50-27. 72 p. Tunnel Mountain and Mount Rae. Cundill's Bostock, H. S., Mulligan, R., and Douglas, R. J. \V., 1957, The Cordilleran region: p. 283-392, "Tunnel Mountain formation" is here called Pis. 30-36, Figs. 61-78; in Geology and eco- the Etherington formation (sec Norris, 1957; nomic minerals of Canada: Geol. Survey Bostock, Mulligan, and Douglas, 1957) to Canada, Econ. Geology, ser. 1, 4th ed., 517 p. conform with more recent nomenclature. Crickmay. C. H., 1955, The Minnewanka section of the Mississippian: published by the author, Five diagnostic fossil assemblages are recog- Imperial Oil Co., Calgary, Alberta, 15 p. 2 nized in sections portrayed on Figure 1 and pis., 3 charts are designated as assemblages A to E, respec- Cundill, J. R., 1955, Notes on faulted Mississip- tively. Spinfer banffensis Warren is the only pian section at Crowsnest Pass: Alberta Soc. Petroleum Geologists Jour., v. 3, no. 8, p. fossil present in assemblage A. This easily 138-139 recognizable species occurs 585 feet above the Dawson, G. M., 1886, Preliminary report on the base of the Livingstone on Tunnel Mountain, physical and geological features of that por- suggesting a middle Livingstone correlation tion of the Rocky Mountains between lati- tudes 49° and 51° 30': Geol. Nat. History for assemblage A in fault slices 1 and 3. Species Survey Canada, pt. B, Ann. Rept. 1885, p. of assemblage B, geographically widespread in 1B-169B the Canadian Rockies, are characteristic of Douglas, R. J. VV.. 1953, Carboniferous stratig- lower Mount Head strata. Cundill's (1955) raphy in the southern Foothills of Alberta: Alberta Soc. Petroleum Geologists Third Ann. lithologic evidence has been used in determining Field Conf. and Symp., p. 68-88, Figs. 1-9, the fault position at the top of fault slice 1, for 9A the stratigraphic interval between assemblage B McKay, B. R., 1932, The Mesozoic-Palaeozoic in this slice and in superjacent slice 2 could contact and associated sediments, Crowsnest district, Alberta and British Columbia: Geol. represent the fossil assemblage range rather Survey Canada Summ. Rept. 1931, pt. B, p. than repetition by faulting. Assemblage C is 1B-25'B, Figs. 1-2 characteristic of the lower part of middle Norris, D. K., 1957, The Rocky Mountain suc- Mount Head although Echinoconchus biseriatus cession at Beehive Pass, Alberta: Alberta Soc. Petroleum Geologists Jour., v. 5, no. 10, (Hall) and Dictyoclostus tenuicoslus (Hall) are p. 248-254. Figs. 1-2 known to range some distance higher. Assem- Warren, P. S., 1927, Banff area, Alberta: Geol. blage D consists of Lithostrotion arizelum Survey Canada Mem. 153, 94 p., 7 pis. (Crickmay). The holotype of this species is 1928, The Palaeozoics of the Crowsnest Pass, Alberta: Roy. Soc. Canada Trans., v. 22, from basal Mount Head strata at Lake Minne- sec. 4, p. 109-119, 1 PI. wanka (Crickmay, 1955). Specimens almost 1933, Geological section in Crowsnest Pass, identical with the type are abundant in upper- Rocky Mountains, Canada: Roy. Canadian most Mount Head at Mount Rae. The writer Inst.
Recommended publications
  • (Foram in Ifers, Algae) and Stratigraphy, Carboniferous
    MicropaIeontoIogicaI Zonation (Foramin ifers, Algae) and Stratigraphy, Carboniferous Peratrovich Formation, Southeastern Alaska By BERNARD L. MAMET, SYLVIE PINARD, and AUGUSTUS K. ARMSTRONG U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2031 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Text and illustrations edited by Mary Lou Callas Line drawings prepared by B.L. Mamet and Stephen Scott Layout and design by Lisa Baserga UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1993 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Mamet, Bernard L. Micropaleontological zonation (foraminifers, algae) and stratigraphy, Carboniferous Peratrovich Formation, southeastern Alaska / by Bernard L. Mamet, Sylvie Pinard, and Augustus K. Armstrong. p. cm.-(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2031) Includes bibtiographical references. 1. Geology, Stratigraphic-Carboniferous. 2. Geology-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 3. Foraminifera, Fossil-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 4. Algae, Fossil-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 5. Paleontology- Carboniferous. 6. Paleontology-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. I. Pinard, Sylvie. II. Armstrong, Augustus K. Ill. Title. IV. Series. QE75.B9 no. 2031 [QE671I 557.3 s--dc20 [551.7'5'097982] 92-32905 CIP CONTENTS Abstract
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air
    Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air Canada (Alberta – VE6/VA6) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S87.1 Issue number 2.2 Date of issue 1st August 2016 Participation start date 1st October 2012 Authorised Association Manager Walker McBryde VA6MCB Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged Page 1 of 63 Document S87.1 v2.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) 1 Change Control ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Association Reference Data ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Programme derivation ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 General information .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Rights of way and access issues ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Maps and navigation .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Safety considerations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Control of the Morphometry of Open Rock Basins, Kananaskis Region, Canadian Rocky Mountains
    5" %~ '.5" :7~, 6[mU ELSEVIER Geomorphology 22 (1998) 313-324 Structural control of the morphometry of open rock basins, Kananaskis region, Canadian Rocky Mountains D.J. Sauchyn a,*, D.M. Cruden b, X.Q. Hu c,1 a Department of Geography, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan $4S OA2, Canada b Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G7, Canada c Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada Received 12 September 1996; revised 18 July 1997; accepted 14 August 1997 Abstract The morphometry of chutes (couloirs), rock funnels, and open cirques are related to the structure of dissected rock masses in the Kananaslds region of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Data for ten morphometric variables were derived from digital elevation models of 56 open rock basins. The basins were classified structurally according to the relative orientations of bedding planes and the rock slopes. A hypothesis of no differences in morphometry among structural classes is rejected from the results of nonparametric analysis of variance and paired comparisons of rank scores. Basins on dip and overdip slopes have a distinct :size, and those on anaclinal slopes have a distinct width and shape. Variation in morphometry from low compactness and area/relief (chutes) to high compactness and low area/relief (funnels) to high compactness and area/relief (open cirques) corresponds to a change in dominant structure from orthoclinal to dip-overdip to underdip to anaclinal. The dip of bedding planes relative to the slope of rockwalls controls the mode of initial displacement of joint blocks and, thereby, the spatial distribution of the retreat of rockwalls.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Geology of the Southern Livingstone Range
    Meteoric fluid isotopic signatures of thrust-fault-related veins in the Livingstone Range anticlinorium and their significance for syn-deformational regional fluid migration Michael A. Cooley*, Raymond A. Price, John M. Dixon, and T. Kurtis Kyser Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering Queen’s University, Kingston, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6 [email protected] ABSTRACT δ13C and δ18O isotope values of calcite in veins and host rocks from thrust fault zones indicate that fluids with meteoric isotopic signatures were present along thrust faults and infiltrating the tip-lines of minor thrusts during the formation of fault-propagation folds in the Livingstone Range Anticlinorium of southwest Alberta. Isotope geochemistry of cross-fault veins indicates that formation fluids predominated within the transverse structures, implying that cross faults were not conduits for local downward infiltration of meteoric water. Meteoric fluids must have been flowing eastward along the major thrust faults from a recharge area in the topographically higher hinterland to the west during formation of the thrust and fold belt. The incursion of meteoric waters coincided with hydrocarbon migration as indicated by hydrocarbon residues within thrust- fault-related calcite veins. Introduction The Livingstone Range of the southern Alberta foothills comprises the easternmost surface exposures of Carboniferous rocks in the southern Canadian Cordillera (Fig. 1). The Livingstone Range is an anticlinorium that developed where the Livingstone thrust cuts up-section in its hanging wall from a regional detachment in the upper Palliser Formation, through the overlying Mississippian Rundle Group and younger strata to an upper detachment within the Jurassic Fernie Formation. The anticlinorium comprises two to three adjacent fault- propagation fold anticlines which contain thrust faults that die out upwards into the cores of the folds.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadomin and Jasper Areas Willem Langenberg and John Waldron
    Field Guide to Selected Geological Sections of the Cadomin and Jasper Areas Willem Langenberg and John Waldron Edmonton Geological Society Field Trip Guide September 22-23, 2007 Introduction The Rocky Mountains can be divided into Foothills, Front Ranges, and Main Ranges as shown in the cartoon below (Fig. 1). Outcrops in the foothills are dominated by softer weathering Mesozoic rocks of the foreland basin: mainly sandstone and shale but also including conglomerates and coal. Most of the clastic rocks represent material eroded from earlier-formed parts of the orogen to the west, which was subsequently cannibalized as the thrustbelt advanced westward in late Mesozoic to early Cenozoic time. Locally in the foothills, the more resistant late Paleozoic carbonate rocks come to the surface in elongated ridges. Saturday's traverse will begin in the foothills of the Cadomin area and proceed southwest into the Front Ranges. In the Front Ranges carbonates dominate the landscape. These represent the late Paleozoic continental margin of the Laurentian continent, now sliced into multiple imbricated thrust sheets. Mesozoic clastics are confined to narrow valleys. On Sunday morning we will take the Yellowhead Highway further into the Front Ranges and eventually into the Main Ranges of the Rockies. In the Main Ranges, lower parts of the stratigraphy are preserved, including widespread outcrops of older, Early Paleozoic carbonates, clastics, and the underlying Proterozoic succession of the Windermere Supergroup. The structural style is different, too. Although thrust sheets are present, they are generally much larger in scale, and their dips are gentler. In addition, the rocks were more ductile when deformed, so that cleavage and folds are much more widely developed in the mudrocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostratigraphy of the Arroyo Penasco Group, Lower Carboniferous (Mississsippian), North-Central New Mexico Augustus K
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/25 Biostratigraphy of the Arroyo Penasco Group, Lower Carboniferous (Mississsippian), north-central New Mexico Augustus K. Armstrong and Bernard L. Mamet, 1974, pp. 145-158 in: Ghost Ranch, Siemers, C. T.; Woodward, L. A.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 25th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 404 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1974 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers of the Canadian Rockies
    Glaciers of North America— GLACIERS OF CANADA GLACIERS OF THE CANADIAN ROCKIES By C. SIMON L. OMMANNEY SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD Edited by RICHARD S. WILLIAMS, Jr., and JANE G. FERRIGNO U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1386–J–1 The Rocky Mountains of Canada include four distinct ranges from the U.S. border to northern British Columbia: Border, Continental, Hart, and Muskwa Ranges. They cover about 170,000 km2, are about 150 km wide, and have an estimated glacierized area of 38,613 km2. Mount Robson, at 3,954 m, is the highest peak. Glaciers range in size from ice fields, with major outlet glaciers, to glacierets. Small mountain-type glaciers in cirques, niches, and ice aprons are scattered throughout the ranges. Ice-cored moraines and rock glaciers are also common CONTENTS Page Abstract ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J199 Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------- 199 FIGURE 1. Mountain ranges of the southern Rocky Mountains------------ 201 2. Mountain ranges of the northern Rocky Mountains ------------ 202 3. Oblique aerial photograph of Mount Assiniboine, Banff National Park, Rocky Mountains----------------------------- 203 4. Sketch map showing glaciers of the Canadian Rocky Mountains -------------------------------------------- 204 5. Photograph of the Victoria Glacier, Rocky Mountains, Alberta, in August 1973 -------------------------------------- 209 TABLE 1. Named glaciers of the Rocky Mountains cited in the chapter
    [Show full text]
  • The Letters F and T Refer to Figures Or Tables Respectively
    INDEX The letters f and t refer to figures or tables respectively "A" Marker, 312f, 313f Amherstberg Formation, 664f, 728f, 733,736f, Ashville Formation, 368f, 397, 400f, 412, 416, Abitibi River, 680,683, 706 741f, 765, 796 685 Acadian Orogeny, 686, 725, 727, 727f, 728, Amica-Bear Rock Formation, 544 Asiak Thrust Belt, 60, 82f 767, 771, 807 Amisk lowlands, 604 Askin Group, 259f Active Formation, 128f, 132f, 133, 139, 140f, ammolite see aragonite Assiniboia valley system, 393 145 Amsden Group, 244 Assiniboine Member, 412, 418 Adam Creek, Ont., 693,705f Amundsen Basin, 60, 69, 70f Assiniboine River, 44, 609, 637 Adam Till, 690f, 691, 6911,693 Amundsen Gulf, 476, 477, 478 Athabasca, Alta., 17,18,20f, 387,442,551,552 Adanac Mines, 339 ancestral North America miogeocline, 259f Athabasca Basin, 70f, 494 Adel Mountains, 415 Ancient Innuitian Margin, 51 Athabasca mobile zone see Athabasca Adel Mountains Volcanics, 455 Ancient Wall Complex, 184 polymetamorphic terrane Adirondack Dome, 714, 765 Anderdon Formation, 736f Athabasca oil sands see also oil and gas fields, Adirondack Inlier, 711 Anderdon Member, 664f 19, 21, 22, 386, 392, 507, 553, 606, 607 Adirondack Mountains, 719, 729,743 Anderson Basin, 50f, 52f, 359f, 360, 374, 381, Athabasca Plain, 617f Aftonian Interglacial, 773 382, 398, 399, 400, 401, 417, 477f, 478 Athabasca polymetamorphic terrane, 70f, Aguathuna Formation, 735f, 738f, 743 Anderson Member, 765 71-72,73 Aida Formation, 84,104, 614 Anderson Plain, 38, 106, 116, 122, 146, 325, Athabasca River, 15, 20f, 35, 43, 273f, 287f, Aklak
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology of Alberta
    Alberta Geological Survey Map 600 Legend Bedrock Geology of Alberta Southwestern Plains Southeastern Plains Central Plains Northwestern Plains Northeastern Plains NEOGENE (± PALEOGENE) NEOGENE ND DEL BONITA GRAVELS: pebble gravel with some cobbles; minor thin beds and lenses NH HAND HILLS FORMATION: gravel and sand, locally cemented into conglomerate; gravel of sand; pebbles consist primarily of quartzite and argillite with minor amounts of sandstone, composed of mainly quartzite and sandstone with minor amounts of chert, arkose, and coal; fluvial amygdaloidal basalt, and diabase; age poorly constrained; fluvial PALEOGENE PALEOGENE PALEOGENE (± NEOGENE) PALEOGENE (± NEOGENE) UPLAND GRAVEL: gravel composed of mainly white quartzite cobbles and pebbles with lesser amounts of UPLAND GRAVEL: gravel capping the Clear Hills, Halverson Ridge, and Caribou Mountains; predominantly .C CYPRESS HILLS FORMATION: gravel and sand, locally cemented to conglomerate; mainly quartzite .G .G and sandstone clasts with minor chert and quartz component; fluvial black chert pebbles; sand matrix; minor thin beds and lenses of sand; includes gravel in the Swan Hills area; white quartzite cobbles and pebbles with lesser amounts of black chert pebbles; quartzite boulders occur in the age poorly constrained; fluvial Clear Hills and Halverson Ridge gravels; sand matrix; ages poorly constrained; extents poorly defined; fluvial .PH PORCUPINE HILLS FORMATION: olive-brown mudstone interbedded with fine- to coarse-grained, .R RAVENSCRAG FORMATION: grey to buff mudstone
    [Show full text]
  • Horn River Basin Aquifer Characterization Project
    HORN RIVER BASIN AQUIFER CHARACTERIZATION PROJECT GEOLOGICAL REPORT Prepared for: HORN RIVER BASIN PRODUCERS GROUP GEOSCIENCE B.C. January, 2010 Petrel Robertson Consulting Ltd. 500, 736 – 8th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 1H4 www.petrelrob.com Petrel Robertson Consulting Ltd. bh/Horn River Basin Aquifer Project/lps EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Study of subsurface stratigraphy in the Horn River Basin shows that three aquifers are potentially capable of supplying water for shale gas well completion operations (fracs), and accepting injection of spent frac fluids: • Mississippian Debolt-Rundle carbonate platform • Upper Mississippian Mattson sandstones • Basal Cretaceous sandstones The Debolt-Rundle carbonate platform can be subdivided into four units mappable across the basin – lower, middle, and upper Rundle, capped by the Debolt. Substantial reservoir quality occurs primarily at the top of the platform, as the result of leaching and dolomitization beneath the pre-Cretaceous unconformity (the “Detrital Zone”). Upper Rundle and Debolt strata appear to be most susceptible to reservoir enhancement, and thus the highest-quality and most continuous reservoir occurs along the upper Rundle and Debolt subcrops in the eastern part of the Horn River Basin. Mattson deltaic to marginal marine sandstones occur only along the extreme western flank of the basin, and thicken rapidly west of the Bovie Fault Zone, into the Liard Basin. Reservoir quality ranges from poor to excellent, but well control is not sufficient for systematic mapping. The Mattson may offer
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Undiscovered Conventional Oil and Gas Resources of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, Canada, 2012
    Assessment of Undiscovered Conventional Oil and Gas Resources of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, Canada, 2012 The U.S. Geological Survey mean estimates of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources from provinces in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin of central Canada are 1,321 million barrels of oil, 25,386 billion cubic feet of gas, and 604 million barrels of natural gas liquids. Introduction Basin Province of Saskatchewan, southeastern Alberta, and southern Manitoba; and (3) the Rocky Mountain Deformed The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) recently completed Belt Province of western Alberta and eastern British Colum- a geoscience-based assessment of undiscovered oil and gas bia (fig. 1). This report is part of the USGS World Petroleum resources of provinces within the Western Canada Sedimentary Resources Project assessment of priority geologic provinces Basin (WCSB) (table 1). The WCSB primarily comprises the of the world. The assessment was based on geoscience ele- (1) Alberta Basin Province of Alberta, eastern British Columbia, ments that define a total petroleum system (TPS) and associated and the southwestern Northwest Territories; (2) the Williston assessment unit(s) (AU). These elements include petroleum 129° 125° 121° 117° 113° 109° 105° 101° 97° 93° 89° Mackenzie Northern Interior Basins Foldbelt NUNAVUT NORTHWEST TERRITORIES 60° Hudson Bay HUDSON CANADA Basin BAY 58° EXPLANATION ALBERTA SASKATCHEWAN Middle and Upper Cretaceous Reservoirs AU Triassic through Lower Cretaceous Reservoirs AU 56° Alberta Basin Mississippian through Canadian Permian Reservoirs AU Shield Upper Devonian and Older Reservoirs AU 54° BRITISH MANITOBA COLUMBIA Williston Basin Edmonton 52° Rocky Mountain Deformed Belt Saskatoon ONTARIO CANADA 50° Area Calgary of map Regina Winnipeg UNITED STATES 48° 0 100 200 MILES WASHINGTON NORTH MONTANA UNITED STATES DAKOTA 0 100 200 KILOMETERS IDAHO Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Aquifer Study to Support Unconventional Gas and Oil Development, Liard Basin, Northeastern B.C
    SUBSURFACE AQUIFER STUDY TO SUPPORT UNCONVENTIONAL GAS AND OIL DEVELOPMENT, LIARD BASIN, NORTHEASTERN B.C. Prepared for Geoscience BC August, 2013 Petrel Robertson Consulting Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS Certificate of Qualification ......................................................................................................................... 1. Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... 2. List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ 3. Regional Stratigraphic Cross-Sections ........................................................................................ 4. Introduction................................................................................................................................................ 5. Study Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 7. Regional Setting ........................................................................................................................................ 10. Geology and Hydrogeology of Aquifer Units ............................................................................................. 14. Chinchaga Formation ................................................................................................................... 15. Hydrogeology
    [Show full text]