DOCSLIB.ORG

Santa Monica Mountains Communities Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Planning Area Incorporates Numerous Stakeholders

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Santa Monica Mountains Communities Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Planning Area Incorporates Numerous Stakeholders Santa Monica Mountains Community Wildfire Protection Plan October 2007 Canyon Fire Santa Monica Mountains Community Wildfire Protection Plan Mutual Agreement Page The Community Wildfire Protection Plan developed for the Santa Monica Mountain Communities: Was collaboratively developed. Interested parties and federal land management agencies managing land in the vicinity of the Santa Monica Mountains have been consulted. This plan identifies and prioritizes areas for hazardous fuel reduction treatments and recommends the types and methods of treatment. This plan recommends measures to reduce the ignitability of structures throughout the area addressed by the plan. The following entities mutually agree with the contents of this Community Wildfire Protection Plan: _____//signature on previous page// _________________ _________________ Daryl L. Osby, Chief Date County of Los Angeles Fire Department _____//signature on previous page// _________________ _________________ Mark Lorenzen, Chief Date Ventura County Fire Department _____//signature on previous page// _________________ _________________ Zev Yaroslavsky, County Supervisor Date County of Los Angeles, Representative 3rd District _____//signature on previous page// _________________ _________________ Linda Parks, County Supervisor Date County of Ventura, Representative 2rd District This page intentionally left blank. Acknowledgements The Santa Monica Mountains Communities Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Planning Area incorporates numerous stakeholders. We wish to acknowledge and thank the organizations that took an active part in creating the CWPP by attending meetings, providing feedback, commenting on the drafts, facilitating, and contributing to the content of the CWPP. Santa Monica Mountains CWPP Collaborator Organizations: Big Rock Mesa Fire Safe Council California Coastal Commission California Department of Parks and Recreation City of Calabasas City of Malibu Corral Canyon Fire Safety Alliance County of Los Angeles Fire Department County of Los Angeles Fire Department, Division of Forestry Las Virgenes Federation of Homeowners Association Horizon Hills Fire Safe Council Malibu Lake Fire Safe Council Malibu Lakeside Homeowners Association Malibu West Fire Safe Council Monte Nido Homeowners Association Mountains Recreation Conservation Authority Mountains Restoration Trust National Park Service National Resource Conservation Service North Topanga Fire Safe Council Resource Conservation District Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Santa Monica Mountains Fire Safe Alliance South Topanga Fire Safe Council Topanga Community Emergency Plan T-CEP University of California Cooperative Extension Ventura County Fire Department West Topanga Fire Safe Council Santa Monica Mountains CWPP Collaborator Acknowledgements Thank-you to the stakeholder agencies, homeowner associations, fire safe councils and individuals whose efforts and staff collaborated heroically to create the content of the CWPP, including Anthony Williams – County of Los Angeles Fire Department Beth Burnham – North Topanga Fire Safe Council Betsy Landis – Native Plant Society Brad Davis – City of Malibu Brad Weisshapt – County of Los Angeles Fire Department, Division of Forestry Cathy Brooke – California Fire Safe Council Clark Stevens – Resource Conservation District SMM Cynthia Scott – County of Los Angeles 3rd District Gary Burden – County of Los Angeles Fire Department Gregory Elwood - National Park Service SMMNRA J Lopez – County of Los Angeles Fire Department, Division of Forestry Jo Kitz – Mountains Restoration Trust Julie Clark de Blasio – Mountains Restoration Trust Kathryn Kirkpatrick - National Park Service SMMNRA Katie Ziemann – California Fire Safe Council Keith Gurolla - Ventura County Fire Department Maria Grycan – County of Los Angeles Fire Department Mike Wilson - National Park Service SMMNRA Paul Mora – Corral Canyon Fire Safety Alliance Robert Taylor - National Park Service SMMNRA Ron Oatman – Ventura County Fire Department Rorie Skei – Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Rosi Dagit – Resource Conservation District SMM Ryan Ulyate – North Topanga Fire Safe Council Sabrina Drill- UC Cooperative Extension Steve Hess – Las Virgenes Federation of Homeowners Associations Steve Williams – Resource Conservation District SMM Susan Nissman – County of Los Angeles 3rd District Susanne Goode – California State Parks Tim Pershing – County of Los Angeles 3rd District Walt Young – Mountains Recreation Conservation Authority Wolfgang Knauer – Horizon Hills Fire Safe Council Initial Draft SMM CWPP Writing and Production The creation of the Santa Monica Mountains CWPP has taken two years and several drafts. ForEverGreenForestry laid the foundation of this document facilitating numerous collaborative meetings with agencies, planning units and individuals, and gathering the research and contributions from participants. Tracy Katelman and her staff, and contributors compiled the first draft of the SMM CWPP, including: Tracy Katelman, ForEverGreenForestry, www.forevergreenforestry.com Deanna Sverdlov, Projects Coordinator Kathy Glass, Senior Editor Four Waters Media Writers: Cameron Naficy Elizabeth Keys Kristina Prosser Stephen Umgertis Terri Anderson Julie Clark de Blasio, Sweetgrass Environmental Consulting Contributors: Rick Halsey, California Chaparral Institute Betsy Landis, Native Plant Society Final SMM CWPP Editing and Production Geo Elements, LLC reviewed and synthesized the large volume of information from the earlier draft, developed site-specific hazard and risk assessments, and produced the final version of the SMM CWPP. The Geo Elements, LLC Team included: Carol Henson, Geo Elements, LLC, www.geoelementsllc.com David Kerr Chris Clervi Julie Thrupp Titus When you search for web versions of this plan will be available on several Santa Monica Mountain cooperator websites. This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 13 1.1 PLAN PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................. 13 1.2 PLANNING AREA BOUNDARIES ........................................................................................................ 13 1.3 POLICY AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................... 17 1.3.1 Federal Level Policy ............................................................................................................ 17 1.3.2 State Level Policy and Regulations..................................................................................... 18 1.3.3 Local and County Policy and Regulations .......................................................................... 20 1.4 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................ 22 1.5 CWPP PROCESS .......................................................................................................................... 23 1.5.1 Community Outreach .......................................................................................................... 23 1.5.2 CWPP Planning Committee ................................................................................................ 24 CHAPTER 2 - SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS OVERVIEW ................................................................................. 25 2.1 VALUES AT RISK ............................................................................................................................ 25 2.1.1 Life Safety ........................................................................................................................... 26 2.1.2 Structures, Businesses, and Infrastructure ......................................................................... 27 2.1.3 Natural and Cultural Resources .......................................................................................... 28 2.1.4 Recreation and Lifestyle ...................................................................................................... 29 2.2 LAND USE AND OWNERSHIP ........................................................................................................... 29 2.3 FIRE PROTECTION ......................................................................................................................... 30 CHAPTER 3 – DEFINING THE WILDFIRE PROBLEM ........................................................................................ 35 3.1 FIRE ECOLOGY .............................................................................................................................. 37 3.1.1 Fire Regimes Condition Class ............................................................................................. 37 3.1.2 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................... 37 3.2 CLIMATE ....................................................................................................................................... 46 3.2.1 Climate Change................................................................................................................... 46 3.3 FIRE HISTORY ............................................................................................................................... 47 3.4 WILDLAND FIRE ENVIRONMENT .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Project Selection Results 2005-2006 Fire Safe California
    Preliminary Project Selection Results 2005-2006 Fire Safe California Grants Clearinghouse Org Name Project Name USDI Bureau of Land Management Projected Community Assistance Projects FFY 2006 Mendocino County Fire Safe Council Inc. Fuel Reduction and Fire Break for Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Cottonwood Creek Watershed Group (CCWG) R-Wild Horse Ranch Fuel Break RCD of Greater San Diego County Support for San Diego County Community Fire Safe Councils Mendocino County Fire Safe Council Inc. Brooktrails Township Fire Program El Dorado County Fire Safe Council Chrome Ridge Road Community Wildlife Protection Plan (Phase I) Kern River Valley Fire Safe Council Kennedy Meadows Doesn't Want to Burn Again Plan Fort Ross Volunteer Fire Department Fort Ross Fuels Reduction/Fire Education/Planning and Crucial Safety Project Lassen County Fire Safe Council Inc. River Bench Fuel Reduction Fire Safe Council of Siskiyou County Fire Safe Council of Siskiyou County Planning and Coordination Support Tehama County Resource Conservation District Tehama East Community Fire Plan Lower Mattole Fire Safe Council Wilder Ridge Phase II: Fuels Reduction for Neighborhood Safety Western Shasta RCD Walker Mine Road Shaded Fuelbreak Bishop Indian Tribal Council Bishop Paiute Reservation Hazardous Fuels Reduction Trinity County Resource Conservation District Poker Bar Community Fuel Reduction Project Yosemite Foothills Fire Safe Council Community Chipping Project Greater Tehachapi Fire Safe Council Bark Beetle Dead Fuels Disposal Project CCWG Bowman Biomass Modoc Fire Safe Council/ North Cal-Neva RC&D Modoc Recreational Estates Strategic Fire Safe Plan Council Fire Safe Council of Nevada County Red Dog - You Bet Neighborhood Fuels Reduction Extension Butte County Fire Safe Council Defensible Space Chipper and Special Needs Program So.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity
    fire The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity s is evidenced year after year, the na- ture of the “fire problem” in south- Jon E. Keeley, Hugh Safford, C.J. Fotheringham, A ern California differs from most of Janet Franklin, and Max Moritz the rest of the United States, both by nature and degree. Nationally, the highest losses in ϳ The 2007 wildfire season in southern California burned over 1,000,000 ac ( 400,000 ha) and property and life caused by wildfire occur in included several megafires. We use the 2007 fires as a case study to draw three major lessons about southern California, but, at the same time, wildfires and wildfire complexity in southern California. First, the great majority of large fires in expansion of housing into these fire-prone southern California occur in the autumn under the influence of Santa Ana windstorms. These fires also wildlands continues at an enormous pace cost the most to contain and cause the most damage to life and property, and the October 2007 fires (Safford 2007). Although modest areas of were no exception because thousands of homes were lost and seven people were killed. Being pushed conifer forest in the southern California by wind gusts over 100 kph, young fuels presented little barrier to their spread as the 2007 fires mountains experience the same negative ef- reburned considerable portions of the area burned in the historic 2003 fire season. Adding to the size fects of long-term fire suppression that are of these fires was the historic 2006–2007 drought that contributed to high dead fuel loads and long evident in other western forests (e.g., high distance spotting.
    [Show full text]
  • Evergreen Fire Protection District Jefferson and Clear Creek Counties, Colorado
    2020 Evergreen Fire Protection District Jefferson and Clear Creek Counties, Colorado F Community Wildfire Protection Plan EVERGREEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN 2020 UPDATE Prepared for Evergreen Fire/Rescue 1802 Bergen Pkwy, Evergreen, Colorado 80439 Prepared by Forest Stewards Guild 170 2nd Street SW Loveland, CO 80537 1 CONTENTS Evergreen Fire Protection District ............................................................................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................5 Evergreen’s Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) .......................................................................................................6 Fire History ..................................................................................................................................................................8 Catastrophic Wildfire – Common Factors .........................................................................................................9 Ignition Prevention ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Evergreen’s Preparedness for Wildfire ................................................................................................................. 11 Community Accomplishments since first CWPP .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDF Here
    Rancho map of Ventura County, showing (inset) Public Land between Rancho Guadalasca to the west and the Ventura/Los Angeles County line on the east, the subject of this issue of the Journal. Published by TICOR Title Insurance Co. in 1988, Leavitt Dudley, artist. — Cover — Yerba Buena and beyond: looking east from Deer Creek Road to Malibu, 2012. Courtesy John Keefe “The Big Ranch Fight” — Table of Contents — Introduction by Charles N. Johnson page 4 “The Big Ranch Fight” by Jo Hindman page 13 About the Author page 33 Afterword by Linda Valois page 35 Appendix page 38 Acknowledgments page 39 Epilogue page 44 VOLUME 53 NUMBER 2 © 2011 Ventura County Historical Society; Museum of Ventura County. All rights reserved. All images, unless indicated otherwise, are from the Museum Research Library Collections. The Journal of Ventura County History 1 Section, Marblehead Land Company Map, 1924, showing location of Houston property (section 15 upper left). Yerba Buena School House (section 11) and entrance to Yerba Buena Road (section 27). Courtesy Mario Quiros 2 “The Big Ranch Fight” “We too are anxious to see those lands settled and improved. It would be far better for us and for everybody else if these disputes had been settled long ago.” Jerome Madden Head of the Southern Pacific Railroad Land Department Ventura Free Press, January 26, 1900 “My mother who had come from Canada to California to be married, had been raised on a farm in a level country. She always referred to this hill as ‘the Mountain.’ There was no road to it, so she had to go up or come down on horseback….
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Knowledge of Extreme Fire Behavior: Volume I for Fire Managers
    United States Department of Agriculture Synthesis of Knowledge of Forest Service Pacific Northwest Extreme Fire Behavior: Research Station General Technical Volume I for Fire Managers Report PNW-GTR-854 November 2011 Paul A. Werth, Brian E. Potter, Craig B. Clements, Mark A. Finney, Scott L. Goodrick, Martin E. Alexander, Miguel G. Cruz, Jason A. Forthofer, and Sara S. McAllister A SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE FROM THE The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of US Wildland Firefighter Entrapments Based on Coincident Fuels, Weather, and Topography
    fire Article A Classification of US Wildland Firefighter Entrapments Based on Coincident Fuels, Weather, and Topography Wesley G. Page *, Patrick H. Freeborn, Bret W. Butler and W. Matt Jolly USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Lab, Missoula, MT 59808, USA; [email protected] (P.H.F.); [email protected] (B.W.B.); [email protected] (W.M.J.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-406-329-4821 Received: 12 September 2019; Accepted: 5 October 2019; Published: 9 October 2019 Abstract: Previous attempts to identify the environmental factors associated with firefighter entrapments in the United States have suggested that there are several common denominators. Despite the widespread acceptance of the assumed commonalities, few studies have quantified how often entrapments actually meet these criteria. An analysis of the environmental conditions at the times and locations of 166 firefighter entrapments involving 1202 people and 117 fatalities that occurred between 1981 and 2017 in the conterminous United States revealed some surprising results. Contrary to general assumptions, we found that at broad spatial scales firefighter entrapments happen under a wide range of environmental conditions, including during low fire danger and on flat terrain. A cluster-based analysis of the data suggested that entrapments group into four unique archetypes that typify the common environmental conditions: (1) low fire danger, (2) high fire danger and steep slopes, (3) high fire danger and low canopy cover, and (4) high fire danger and high canopy cover. There are at least three important implications from the results of this study; one, fire environment conditions do not need to be extreme or unusual for an entrapment to occur, two, the region and site specific context is important, and, three, non-environmental factors such as human behavior remain a critical but difficult to assess factor in wildland firefighter entrapment potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2016/1297 ON THE COVER: Photograph of Boney Mountain (and the Milky Way). The Santa Monica Mountains are part of the Transverse Ranges. The backbone of the range skirts the northern edges of the Los Angeles Basin and Santa Monica Bay before descending into the Pacific Ocean at Point Mugu. The ridgeline of Boney Mountain is composed on Conejo Volcanics, which erupted as part of a shield volcano about 15 million years ago. National Park Service photograph available at http://www.nps.gov/samo/learn/photosmultimedia/index.htm. THIS PAGE: Photograph of Point Dume. Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area comprises a vast and varied California landscape in and around the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area and includes 64 km (40 mi) of ocean shoreline. The mild climate allows visitors to enjoy the park’s scenic, natural, and cultural resources year-round. National Park Service photograph available at https://www.flickr.com/photos/ santamonicamtns/albums. Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2016/1297 Katie KellerLynn Colorado State University Research Associate National Park Service Geologic Resources Division Geologic Resources Inventory PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 September 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment a ‐ Forest Service Wildfire, NEPA, and Salvage Summary
    Attachment A ‐ Forest Service Wildfire, NEPA, and Salvage Summary Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007‐2016 Number of Fires 1 63 64 53 33 66 79 56 56 127 110 707 Total fire acres on NFS 2 1,751,118 1,326,893 549,108 211,327 1,489,029 2,411,413 1,141,353 741,465 1,587,843 1,038,686 12,248,235 High severity acres on NFS 3 842,658 368,595 268,944 76,192 619,020 809,720 513,957 265,045 489,668 397,654 4,651,453 Number of NEPA decisions identified 4 129 Acres of salvage planned in NEPA 5 218 17,255 2,134 14,010 22,761 28,937 13,809 13,264 112,388 Number of NEPA decisions litigated 6 125110332422 Litigation cases won by USFS 7 013110131112 Litigation cases lost by USFS 8 1120001011 7 Litigation cases pending 9 0000001002 3 Acres of salvage reported accomplished 10 328 2,665 8,125 3,464 8,774 6,916 11,672 19,792 16,926 21,234 99,896 1 Fires burning more than 1,000 acres on NFS land 10 Salvage harvest activity records identified as awarded in Forest Service Activity 2 Total acres inside fire perimeter on NFS land Tracking System (FACTS) by GIS analysis of fire perimeters. 3 Classified as greater than 75% mortality using Rapid Assessment of Vegetation Condition after Wildfire (RAVG) 4 Identified by fire salvage keyword search in PALS (Planning Appeals and Disclaimer: Only the litigation data is believed to be 100% complete and Litigation System) or reported with sale activity records in Forest Service systems accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • To Oral History
    100 E. Main St. [email protected] Ventura, CA 93001 (805) 653-0323 x 320 QUARTERLY JOURNAL SUBJECT INDEX About the Index The index to Quarterly subjects represents journals published from 1955 to 2000. Fully capitalized access terms are from Library of Congress Subject Headings. For further information, contact the Librarian. Subject to availability, some back issues of the Quarterly may be ordered by contacting the Museum Store: 805-653-0323 x 316. A AB 218 (Assembly Bill 218), 17/3:1-29, 21 ill.; 30/4:8 AB 442 (Assembly Bill 442), 17/1:2-15 Abadie, (Señor) Domingo, 1/4:3, 8n3; 17/2:ABA Abadie, William, 17/2:ABA Abbott, Perry, 8/2:23 Abella, (Fray) Ramon, 22/2:7 Ablett, Charles E., 10/3:4; 25/1:5 Absco see RAILROADS, Stations Abplanalp, Edward "Ed," 4/2:17; 23/4:49 ill. Abraham, J., 23/4:13 Abu, 10/1:21-23, 24; 26/2:21 Adams, (rented from Juan Camarillo, 1911), 14/1:48 Adams, (Dr.), 4/3:17, 19 Adams, Alpha, 4/1:12, 13 ph. Adams, Asa, 21/3:49; 21/4:2 map Adams, (Mrs.) Asa (Siren), 21/3:49 Adams Canyon, 1/3:16, 5/3:11, 18-20; 17/2:ADA Adams, Eber, 21/3:49 Adams, (Mrs.) Eber (Freelove), 21/3:49 Adams, George F., 9/4:13, 14 Adams, J. H., 4/3:9, 11 Adams, Joachim, 26/1:13 Adams, (Mrs.) Mable Langevin, 14/1:1, 4 ph., 5 Adams, Olen, 29/3:25 Adams, W. G., 22/3:24 Adams, (Mrs.) W.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Fauna
    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Ecosystems Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 1 Effects of Fire on Fauna January 2000 Abstract _____________________________________ Smith, Jane Kapler, ed. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on fauna. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 83 p. Fires affect animals mainly through effects on their habitat. Fires often cause short-term increases in wildlife foods that contribute to increases in populations of some animals. These increases are moderated by the animals’ ability to thrive in the altered, often simplified, structure of the postfire environment. The extent of fire effects on animal communities generally depends on the extent of change in habitat structure and species composition caused by fire. Stand-replacement fires usually cause greater changes in the faunal communities of forests than in those of grasslands. Within forests, stand- replacement fires usually alter the animal community more dramatically than understory fires. Animal species are adapted to survive the pattern of fire frequency, season, size, severity, and uniformity that characterized their habitat in presettlement times. When fire frequency increases or decreases substantially or fire severity changes from presettlement patterns, habitat for many animal species declines. Keywords: fire effects, fire management, fire regime, habitat, succession, wildlife The volumes in “The Rainbow Series” will be published during the year 2000. To order, check the box or boxes below, fill in the address form, and send to the mailing address listed below.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Fresno-Kings Unit Fire Plan
    Fresno-Kings Unit 5/03/2020 UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS Page Numbers Description Updated Date Section Updated Updated of Update By 4/30/20 Appendix A 36-38 Fire Plan Projects B. Garabedian 4/30/20 Appendix B 40-41 Added Wildland Activity B. Garabedian Chart 4/30/20 Appendix C 42 Update Ignition Data B. Garabedian 4/30/20 Various 103-119 2019 Accomplishment B. Garabedian i TABLE OF CONTENTS UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS .................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... ii SIGNATURE PAGE ............................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 3 UNIT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 FIRE HISTORY ................................................................................................................................ 4 UNIT PREPAREDNESS AND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES ..................................................... 4 SECTION II: COLLABORATION..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]