DOCSLIB.ORG

Geochronology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SECOND AUSTRALIAN CONFERENCE ON INIS-mf—12772 GEOCHRONOLOGY 27-29 September, 1989 WORKSHOP PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1989 SYDNEY Unedited abstracts - not to be cited without permission of the author SPONSORS: Centre for Isotope Studies, CSBRO Division of Exploration Geoscience Selby Anax, Sydney Advanced Analytical P/L, VG Isotech, UK Sydney ACOG 89 PROGRAM WEDNESDAY 27 SEPTEMBER 9.45 Brian Gulson - Welcome and introductory remarks. SESSION I. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN ISOTOPE STUDIES METHODOLOGY, INSTRUMENTATION Chairman; Brian Gulson 10.00 Steve Clement and Bill Compston (RSES): SIMS at high mass resolution. 10.25 Peter Kinny (RSES): New SHRIMP applications. 10.50 Chuck Douthitt and Jim Bearpark (Finnigan MAT): Recent advances in thermal ionization mass spectrometry. 11.15 Soey Sie (CSIRO): Preview of the CSIRO-AMS facility. 11.40 John Cantle (VG Instruments): A comparison of multicollector methods plus a discussion of factors relating to optimum precision in a thermal ionisation mass spectrometer. 12.05 Masahiko Honda, Ian McDougall, A. Doulgeris and Des Patterson (RSES): Analytical techniques for measurement of noble gases in terrestrial samples. 12.30 LUNCH Chairman: Bill Compston 2.00 Graham Mortimer (RSES): A new facility in isotope geochemistry at RSES. 2.25 Ian McDougall (RSES): Precision of K-Ar and 40Ar/39Ar dating. SESSION II. ISOTOPE STUDIES RELATING TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY 2.50 Caroline Perkins, Ian McDougall, Jon Claoue-Long (RSES) and Paul Heithersay (Geopeko): ^Ar/^Ar an(j u-Pb geochronology of the Goonumbla and Gidginbung gold deposits, NSW. 3.15 Jeremy Richards and Ian McDougall (RSES): K-Ar and 40Ar/39Ar age relationships at the Porgera gold deposit, PNG. 3.40 AFTERNOON TEA Chairman: Joe Hamilton 4.05 Graham Carr and Judy Dean (CSIRO): Mantle lead signatures of Ordovician gold mineralization in the Lachlan Fold Belt of NSW. 4.30 Brian Gulson, Karen Mizon, (CSIRO), Brian Atkinson, Tony Andrew (OGS), Dave Burrows, Nick Callan, Steve Noble (U of T), Fernando Corfu (ROM): The dilem ma of the source of gold in Archean greenstone deposits. 5.30-7.30 Ice Breaker, NBTC Conference Rooms THURSDAY 28 SEPTEMBER SESSION III. ISOTOPE STUDIES RELATING TO GRANITES Chairman: Rod Brown 9.00 Rob Creaser (La Trobe): U-Pb and Sm-Nd isotopic evidence for the age and origin of mid-Proterozoic felsie magmatism of the eastern Gawler craton, South Australia. 9.25 Stirling Shaw and Dick Flood (Macquarie): Carboniferous igneous activity in the Lachlan and New England Fold Belts: parts of the same magmatic arc? 9.50 Yadong Chen (Macquarie): Sr isotopic studies on mafic enclaves and host rocks of the Glenbog, Anembo and Blue Gum plutons of the Bega Batholith. 10.15 Morning Tea Chairman; Rod Page 10.40 Shen-su Sun (BMR): Chemical and isotopic systematics of the Blue Tier Batholith, N.E. Tasmania: its bearing on the origin of the tin-bearing alkali feldspar granites. SESSION IV. FISSION TRACK STUDIES/SEDIMENTARY BASINS AND OTHERS 11.05 Andy Gleadow (La Trobe): Fission track length studies and age patterns in western Victoria, (abstract not received) 11.30 Joe Hamilton (CSIRO), Tony Fallick (SURRC), Julian Andrews (East Anglia) and Dave Whitford (CSIRO): Isotopic studies of the provenance and post depositional alteration of Jurassic clay mineral assemblages, Scotland. 11.55 Rod Brown (La Trobe): Dating and measuring regional episodes of denudation using apatite fission track analysis: an example from southern Africa. 12.20 LUNCH SESSION V. OTHER PETROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS Chairman: Stirling Shaw 2.00 Dave Whitford (CSIRO), Tony Crawford (U. of Tas.), Michael Korsch and Steve Craven (CSIRO): The Mount Read Voleanics, Tasmania: Sr and Nd isotope geochemistry. 2.25 Sue O'Reilly (Macquarie) and Bill Griffin (CSIRO): Isotopic signatures of mantle rocks from south eastern Australia. 2.50 Neil McNaughton (UWA), Dave Nelson, John de Laeter (Curtin) and Ian Fletcher (GSWA): The Bunbury Basalt: Kerguelen - Heard Island hot-spot volcanism along the continental margin of SW Australia. 3.15 Bill Griffin (CSIRO) and Sue O'Reilly (Macquarie): Sm-Nd dating of garnet- bearing rocks: empirical evaluation of constraints on resetting. SESSION VI. PRECAMBRIAN GEOCHRONOLOGY Chairman: Dave VVhitford 4.05 Li Huimin (China), Rod Page, Mick Bower (BMR) and Bill Compston (RSES): Four methods of zircon dating: case study from the Proterozoic Zhongtiao Mountains, Shanxi Province, China. 4.30 Dave Nelson (Curtin), Alee Trendall (GSWA) and John de Laeter (Curtin): Sm-Nd isotopic complexities in Archaean mafic lavas and implications for Sm-Nd geochronology. 4.55 Jon Claoue-Long (RSES), R.W. King and Rob Kerrich (Saskatchewan): Dating Archaean gold deposits with the ion-probe: a Canadian example. 3.40 AFTERNOON TEA 7.00 for 7.30 pm ACOG DINNER, MACQDARIE UNIVERSITY STAFF CLUB FRIDAY 29 SEPTEMBER Chairman: Ian McDougall 9.00 John de Laeter (Curtin) and W.G. Libby (GSWA): 500 Ma biotite Rb-Sr dates in the Yilgarn Block near Harvey. 9.25 Des Patterson (RSES): Noble gases as tracers of volatiles in subduction zones. 9.50 R.J. Ryburn, Rod Page, John Richards, V. Laynne and E.P. Shelley (BMR): 'Ozchron' - a national database of Australian geochronology. 10.05 Discussions about ICOG-7 10.30 MORNING TEA Visit stable/radiogenic/accelerator laboratories Dating and measuring regional episodes of denudation using apatite fission track analysis: an example from southern Africa. Roderick Brown Department of Geology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, 3083, Australia. The chronology and nature of landscape development in southern Africa has stimulated debate since the beginning of the present century, and yet no consensus has been reached. Major differences in viewpoint result largely from a lack of quantitative information concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation episodes affecting the sub-continent, particularly since the break, up of Gondwana, The major discrepancies between the various proposed landscape chronologies imply that there are fundamental problems associated with dating approaches used up until now, for example, in the correlation between landsurfaces and unconformities in the offshore sedimentary record. This situation suggests that the use of a more direct dating technique may help to resolve these discrepancies. Apatite fission track analysis (AFTA) is a valuable tool for evaluating the thermal history of rocks at temperatures below ~125°C and consequently for examining the thenno-tectenic development of the upper few kilometres of the Earth's crust. As a result AFTA can be used to date major periods of denudation directly . The application of apatite fission track analysis to rocks collected from a range of elevations along the western continental margin of souihem Africa indicates that the present land surface exposes rocks that have cooled rapidly from temperatures above ~125°C to temperatures below ~60°C during the early Cretaceous. This rapid cooling of the upper crust is interpreted as the result of accelerated erosion and consequent uplift of the rock column associated with the early development of the continental margin. The timing of this episode of denudation is broadly synchronous with the break up of West Gondwana and correlates with the pattern of sedimentation derived from borehole data in the adjacent offshore basin. Furthermore, the -125°C palaeo-isothermal surface for the pre-uplift crust is recorded by the apatite age-elevation profiles as a distinct break in slope. The present day elevation at which this break occurs allows an estimate of the amount of denudation to be made. For reasonable estimates of the palaeo-geothermal gradient some kilometers of denudation must have taken place. For a palaeo-geothermal gradient of 30°C/km the caJcuatcd amount of denudation is 2.5 km. In addition, the presently available AFTA data indicates that the denudation was regional in extent ABSTRACT PR J E CANTLE. VG INSTRUMENTS A COMPARISON OF MULT1OOLLECTOR METHODS PLUS A DISCUSSION OF FACTORS RELATING TO OPTIMUM PRECISION IN A THERMAL IONISATION MASS SPECTROMETER Static multicollection is the simultaneous collection of multiple ion beams where each isotope i? dlocated to a designated collector. It lias been developed as a technique which removes errors due to ion beam fluctuations which can limit the precision of single collector measurements. In the Dynamic multicollection mode, groups of isotopes are measured with a peak-jumping technique. It has been shown that dynamic mukicollection provides significant benefits in terms of reproducibilily in isotope systems that can be normalised. In static multicollection, the precision of measurement is constrained not only by ion statistics, but also by amplifier noise and amplifier drift. In particular, the stability of the relative gain between the resistors in each collector channel can have a significant effect on the ultimate precision achievable. The VG Sector 54 thermal ionisation mass spectrometer uses the Multi-2 collector which is unique in commercially-available niulticollectors in that the resistor and amplifier boards are kept within a special environmentally-sealed housing which is evacuated and cooled by a 'Peltier-effect' device to 10°C + 0.01°C. Furthermore ultra low temperature coefficient resistors are used with a specification of 200ppm/°C. The design of the Multi-2 collector and the use of ultra-low temperature coefficient resistors permits extremely stable long-term gain calibrations. Stability is such thai ultimate precision in static mode should only be limited by ion statistics. MANTLE LEAD SIGNATURES OF ORDOVICIAN GOLD MINERALIZATION IN THE LACHLAN FOLD BELT OF NSW Graham R. Carr and Judith A. Dean CSIRO Division of Exploration Geoscience Lead isotopic signatures of ore deposits are used by a number of Australian mining companies as a gcochemical discriminator in their exploration programs. In the Lachlan Fold Belt (LFB), the isotopic signatures of massive sulf ide mineralization associated with greywackes and acid volcanic rocks is well established. However there has been a dearth of Pb isotopic data on other styles of mineralization, particularly the porphyry-breccia-pipe-epithermal associations which can repre- sent major resources of Cu and Au.
Recommended publications
  • Download File

    Download File

    Chronology and Faunal Evolution of the Middle Eocene Bridgerian North American Land Mammal “Age”: Achieving High Precision Geochronology Kaori Tsukui Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2016 © 2015 Kaori Tsukui All rights reserved ABSTRACT Chronology and Faunal Evolution of the Middle Eocene Bridgerian North American Land Mammal “Age”: Achieving High Precision Geochronology Kaori Tsukui The age of the Bridgerian/Uintan boundary has been regarded as one of the most important outstanding problems in North American Land Mammal “Age” (NALMA) biochronology. The Bridger Basin in southwestern Wyoming preserves one of the best stratigraphic records of the faunal boundary as well as the preceding Bridgerian NALMA. In this dissertation, I first developed a chronological framework for the Eocene Bridger Formation including the age of the boundary, based on a combination of magnetostratigraphy and U-Pb ID-TIMS geochronology. Within the temporal framework, I attempted at making a regional correlation of the boundary-bearing strata within the western U.S., and also assessed the body size evolution of three representative taxa from the Bridger Basin within the context of Early Eocene Climatic Optimum. Integrating radioisotopic, magnetostratigraphic and astronomical data from the early to middle Eocene, I reviewed various calibration models for the Geological Time Scale and intercalibration of 40Ar/39Ar data among laboratories and against U-Pb data, toward the community goal of achieving a high precision and well integrated Geological Time Scale. In Chapter 2, I present a magnetostratigraphy and U-Pb zircon geochronology of the Bridger Formation from the Bridger Basin in southwestern Wyoming.
  • MARS DURING the PRE-NOACHIAN. J. C. Andrews-Hanna1 and W. B. Bottke2, 1Lunar and Planetary La- Boratory, University of Arizona

    MARS DURING the PRE-NOACHIAN. J. C. Andrews-Hanna1 and W. B. Bottke2, 1Lunar and Planetary La- Boratory, University of Arizona

    Fourth Conference on Early Mars 2017 (LPI Contrib. No. 2014) 3078.pdf MARS DURING THE PRE-NOACHIAN. J. C. Andrews-Hanna1 and W. B. Bottke2, 1Lunar and Planetary La- boratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, [email protected], 2Southwest Research Institute and NASA’s SSERVI-ISET team, 1050 Walnut St., Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302. Introduction: The surface geology of Mars appar- ing the pre-Noachian was ~10% of that during the ently dates back to the beginning of the Early Noachi- LHB. Consideration of the sawtooth-shaped exponen- an, at ~4.1 Ga, leaving ~400 Myr of Mars’ earliest tially declining impact fluxes both in the aftermath of evolution effectively unconstrained [1]. However, an planet formation and during the Late Heavy Bom- enduring record of the earlier pre-Noachian conditions bardment [5] suggests that the impact flux during persists in geophysical and mineralogical data. We use much of the pre-Noachian was even lower than indi- geophysical evidence, primarily in the form of the cated above. This bombardment history is consistent preservation of the crustal dichotomy boundary, to- with a late heavy bombardment (LHB) of the inner gether with mineralogical evidence in order to infer the Solar System [6] during which HUIA formed, which prevailing surface conditions during the pre-Noachian. followed the planet formation era impacts during The emerging picture is a pre-Noachian Mars that was which the dichotomy formed. less dynamic than Noachian Mars in terms of impacts, Pre-Noachian Tectonism and Volcanism: The geodynamics, and hydrology. crust within each of the southern highlands and north- Pre-Noachian Impacts: We define the pre- ern lowlands is remarkably uniform in thickness, aside Noachian as the time period bounded by two impacts – from regions in which it has been thickened by volcan- the dichotomy-forming impact and the Hellas-forming ism (e.g., Tharsis, Elysium) or thinned by impacts impact.
  • Critical Analysis of Article "21 Reasons to Believe the Earth Is Young" by Jeff Miller

    Critical Analysis of Article "21 Reasons to Believe the Earth Is Young" by Jeff Miller

    1 Critical analysis of article "21 Reasons to Believe the Earth is Young" by Jeff Miller Lorence G. Collins [email protected] Ken Woglemuth [email protected] January 7, 2019 Introduction The article by Dr. Jeff Miller can be accessed at the following link: http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article=5641 and is an article published by Apologetic Press, v. 39, n.1, 2018. The problems start with the Article In Brief in the boxed paragraph, and with the very first sentence. The Bible does not give an age of the Earth of 6,000 to 10,000 years, or even imply − this is added to Scripture by Dr. Miller and other young-Earth creationists. R. C. Sproul was one of evangelicalism's outstanding theologians, and he stated point blank at the Legionier Conference panel discussion that he does not know how old the Earth is, and the Bible does not inform us. When there has been some apparent conflict, either the theologians or the scientists are wrong, because God is the Author of the Bible and His handiwork is in general revelation. In the days of Copernicus and Galileo, the theologians were wrong. Today we do not know of anyone who believes that the Earth is the center of the universe. 2 The last sentence of this "Article In Brief" is boldly false. There is almost no credible evidence from paleontology, geology, astrophysics, or geophysics that refutes deep time. Dr. Miller states: "The age of the Earth, according to naturalists and old- Earth advocates, is 4.5 billion years.
  • “Anthropocene” Epoch: Scientific Decision Or Political Statement?

    “Anthropocene” Epoch: Scientific Decision Or Political Statement?

    The “Anthropocene” epoch: Scientific decision or political statement? Stanley C. Finney*, Dept. of Geological Sciences, California Official recognition of the concept would invite State University at Long Beach, Long Beach, California 90277, cross-disciplinary science. And it would encourage a mindset USA; and Lucy E. Edwards**, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, that will be important not only to fully understand the Virginia 20192, USA transformation now occurring but to take action to control it. … Humans may yet ensure that these early years of the ABSTRACT Anthropocene are a geological glitch and not just a prelude The proposal for the “Anthropocene” epoch as a formal unit of to a far more severe disruption. But the first step is to recognize, the geologic time scale has received extensive attention in scien- as the term Anthropocene invites us to do, that we are tific and public media. However, most articles on the in the driver’s seat. (Nature, 2011, p. 254) Anthropocene misrepresent the nature of the units of the International Chronostratigraphic Chart, which is produced by That editorial, as with most articles on the Anthropocene, did the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) and serves as not consider the mission of the International Commission on the basis for the geologic time scale. The stratigraphic record of Stratigraphy (ICS), nor did it present an understanding of the the Anthropocene is minimal, especially with its recently nature of the units of the International Chronostratigraphic Chart proposed beginning in 1945; it is that of a human lifespan, and on which the units of the geologic time scale are based.
  • Golden Spikes, Transitions, Boundary Objects, and Anthropogenic Seascapes

    Golden Spikes, Transitions, Boundary Objects, and Anthropogenic Seascapes

    sustainability Article A Meaningful Anthropocene?: Golden Spikes, Transitions, Boundary Objects, and Anthropogenic Seascapes Todd J. Braje * and Matthew Lauer Department of Anthropology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 June 2020; Accepted: 7 August 2020; Published: 11 August 2020 Abstract: As the number of academic manuscripts explicitly referencing the Anthropocene increases, a theme that seems to tie them all together is the general lack of continuity on how we should define the Anthropocene. In an attempt to formalize the concept, the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG) is working to identify, in the stratigraphic record, a Global Stratigraphic Section and Point (GSSP) or golden spike for a mid-twentieth century Anthropocene starting point. Rather than clarifying our understanding of the Anthropocene, we argue that the AWG’s effort to provide an authoritative definition undermines the original intent of the concept, as a call-to-arms for future sustainable management of local, regional, and global environments, and weakens the concept’s capacity to fundamentally reconfigure the established boundaries between the social and natural sciences. To sustain the creative and productive power of the Anthropocene concept, we argue that it is best understood as a “boundary object,” where it can be adaptable enough to incorporate multiple viewpoints, but robust enough to be meaningful within different disciplines. Here, we provide two examples from our work on the deep history of anthropogenic seascapes, which demonstrate the power of the Anthropocene to stimulate new thinking about the entanglement of humans and non-humans, and for building interdisciplinary solutions to modern environmental issues.
  • Geologic Time and Geologic Maps

    Geologic Time and Geologic Maps

    NAME GEOLOGIC TIME AND GEOLOGIC MAPS I. Introduction There are two types of geologic time, relative and absolute. In the case of relative time geologic events are arranged in their order of occurrence. No attempt is made to determine the actual time at which they occurred. For example, in a sequence of flat lying rocks, shale is on top of sandstone. The shale, therefore, must by younger (deposited after the sandstone), but how much younger is not known. In the case of absolute time the actual age of the geologic event is determined. This is usually done using a radiometric-dating technique. II. Relative geologic age In this section several techniques are considered for determining the relative age of geologic events. For example, four sedimentary rocks are piled-up as shown on Figure 1. A must have been deposited first and is the oldest. D must have been deposited last and is the youngest. This is an example of a general geologic law known as the Law of Superposition. This law states that in any pile of sedimentary strata that has not been disturbed by folding or overturning since accumulation, the youngest stratum is at the top and the oldest is at the base. While this may seem to be a simple observation, this principle of superposition (or stratigraphic succession) is the basis of the geologic column which lists rock units in their relative order of formation. As a second example, Figure 2 shows a sandstone that has been cut by two dikes (igneous intrusions that are tabular in shape).The sandstone, A, is the oldest rock since it is intruded by both dikes.
  • Geochronology Database for Central Colorado

    Geochronology Database for Central Colorado

    Geochronology Database for Central Colorado Data Series 489 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geochronology Database for Central Colorado By T.L. Klein, K.V. Evans, and E.H. DeWitt Data Series 489 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: T.L. Klein, K.V. Evans, and E.H. DeWitt, 2009, Geochronology database for central Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 489, 13 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1
  • Data of Geochemistry

    Data of Geochemistry

    Data of Geochemistry * Chapter T. Nondetrital Siliceous Sediments GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 440-T Data of Geochemistry Michael Fleischer, Technical Editor Chapter T. Nondetrital Siliceous Sediments By EARLE R. CRESSMAN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 440-T Tabulation and discussion of chemical analyses of chert with respect to mineralogic composition, petrographic type, and geologic occurrence UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEW ART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. DATA OP GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION Michael Fleischer, Technical Editor The first edition of the Data of Geochemistry, by F. W. Clarke, was published in 1908 as U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 330. Later editions, also by Clarke, were published in 1911, 1916, 1920, and 1924 as Bul­ letins 491, 616, 695, and 770. This, the sixth edition, has been written by several scientists in the Geological Survey and in other institutions in the United States and abroad, each preparing a chapter on his special field. The current edition is being published in individual chapters, titles of which are listed below. Chapters already published are indicated by boldface type. CHAPTER A. The chemical elements B. Cosmochemistry C. Internal structure and composition of the Earth D. Composition of the earth's crust E. Chemistry of the atmosphere F. Chemical composition of subsurface waters, by Donald E. White, John D. Hem, and G. A. Waring G. Chemical composition of rivers and lakes, by Daniel A. Livingstone H. Chemistry of the oceans I.
  • It's About Time: Opportunities & Challenges for U.S

    It's About Time: Opportunities & Challenges for U.S

    I t’s About Time: Opportunities & Challenges for U.S. Geochronology About Time: Opportunities & Challenges for t’s It’s About Time: Opportunities & Challenges for U.S. Geochronology 222508_Cover_r1.indd 1 2/23/15 6:11 PM A view of the Bowen River valley, demonstrating the dramatic scenery and glacial imprint found in Fiordland National Park, New Zealand. Recent innovations in geochronology have quantified how such landscapes developed through time; Shuster et al., 2011. Photo taken Cover photo: The Grand Canyon, recording nearly two billion years of Earth history (photo courtesy of Dr. Scott Chandler) from near the summit of Sheerdown Peak (looking north); by J. Sanders. 222508_Cover.indd 2 2/21/15 8:41 AM DEEP TIME is what separates geology from all other sciences. This report presents recommendations for improving how we measure time (geochronometry) and use it to understand a broad range of Earth processes (geochronology). 222508_Text.indd 3 2/21/15 8:42 AM FRONT MATTER Written by: T. M. Harrison, S. L. Baldwin, M. Caffee, G. E. Gehrels, B. Schoene, D. L. Shuster, and B. S. Singer Reviews and other commentary provided by: S. A. Bowring, P. Copeland, R. L. Edwards, K. A. Farley, and K. V. Hodges This report is drawn from the presentations and discussions held at a workshop prior to the V.M. Goldschmidt in Sacramento, California (June 7, 2014), a discussion at the 14th International Thermochronology Conference in Chamonix, France (September 9, 2014), and a Town Hall meeting at the Geological Society of America Annual Meeting in Vancouver, Canada (October 21, 2014) This report was provided to representatives of the National Science Foundation, the U.S.
  • Terminology of Geological Time: Establishment of a Community Standard

    Terminology of Geological Time: Establishment of a Community Standard

    Terminology of geological time: Establishment of a community standard Marie-Pierre Aubry1, John A. Van Couvering2, Nicholas Christie-Blick3, Ed Landing4, Brian R. Pratt5, Donald E. Owen6 and Ismael Ferrusquía-Villafranca7 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway NJ 08854, USA; email: [email protected] 2Micropaleontology Press, New York, NY 10001, USA email: [email protected] 3Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades NY 10964, USA email: [email protected] 4New York State Museum, Madison Avenue, Albany NY 12230, USA email: [email protected] 5Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon SK7N 5E2, Canada; email: [email protected] 6Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont TX 77710 USA email: [email protected] 7Universidad Nacional Autónomo de México, Instituto de Geologia, México DF email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: It has been recommended that geological time be described in a single set of terms and according to metric or SI (“Système International d’Unités”) standards, to ensure “worldwide unification of measurement”. While any effort to improve communication in sci- entific research and writing is to be encouraged, we are also concerned that fundamental differences between date and duration, in the way that our profession expresses geological time, would be lost in such an oversimplified terminology. In addition, no precise value for ‘year’ in the SI base unit of second has been accepted by the international bodies. Under any circumstances, however, it remains the fact that geologi- cal dates – as points in time – are not relevant to the SI.
  • PHANEROZOIC and PRECAMBRIAN CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY 2016

    PHANEROZOIC and PRECAMBRIAN CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY 2016

    PHANEROZOIC and PRECAMBRIAN CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY 2016 Series/ Age Series/ Age Erathem/ System/ Age Epoch Stage/Age Ma Epoch Stage/Age Ma Era Period Ma GSSP/ GSSA GSSP GSSP Eonothem Eon Eonothem Erathem Period Eonothem Period Eon Era System System Eon Erathem Era 237.0 541 Anthropocene * Ladinian Ediacaran Middle 241.5 Neo- 635 Upper Anisian Cryogenian 4.2 ka 246.8 proterozoic 720 Holocene Middle Olenekian Tonian 8.2 ka Triassic Lower 249.8 1000 Lower Mesozoic Induan Stenian 11.8 ka 251.9 Meso- 1200 Upper Changhsingian Ectasian 126 ka Lopingian 254.2 proterozoic 1400 “Ionian” Wuchiapingian Calymmian Quaternary Pleisto- 773 ka 259.8 1600 cene Calabrian Capitanian Statherian 1.80 Guada- 265.1 Proterozoic 1800 Gelasian Wordian Paleo- Orosirian 2.58 lupian 268.8 2050 Piacenzian Roadian proterozoic Rhyacian Pliocene 3.60 272.3 2300 Zanclean Kungurian Siderian 5.33 Permian 282.0 2500 Messinian Artinskian Neo- 7.25 Cisuralian 290.1 Tortonian Sakmarian archean 11.63 295.0 2800 Serravallian Asselian Meso- Miocene 13.82 298.9 r e c a m b i n P Neogene Langhian Gzhelian archean 15.97 Upper 303.4 3200 Burdigalian Kasimovian Paleo- C e n o z i c 20.44 306.7 Archean archean Aquitanian Penn- Middle Moscovian 23.03 sylvanian 314.6 3600 Chattian Lower Bashkirian Oligocene 28.1 323.2 Eoarchean Rupelian Upper Serpukhovian 33.9 330.9 4000 Priabonian Middle Visean 38.0 Carboniferous 346.7 Hadean (informal) Missis- Bartonian sippian Lower Tournaisian Eocene 41.0 358.9 ~4560 Lutetian Famennian 47.8 Upper 372.2 Ypresian Frasnian Units of the international Paleogene 56.0 382.7 Thanetian Givetian chronostratigraphic scale with 59.2 Middle 387.7 Paleocene Selandian Eifelian estimated numerical ages.
  • Dating and Chronology Building - R

    Dating and Chronology Building - R

    ARCHAEOLOGY – Dating and Chronology Building - R. E. Taylor DATING AND CHRONOLOGY BUILDING R. E. Taylor University of California, USA Keywords: Dating methods, chronometric dating, seriation, stratigraphy, geochronology, radiocarbon dating, potassium-argon/argon-argon dating, Pleistocene, Quaternary. Contents 1. Chronological Frameworks 1.1 Relative and Chronometric Time 1.2 History and Prehistory 2. Chronology in Archaeology 2.1 Historical Development 2.2 Geochronological Units 3. Chronology Building 3.1 Development of Historic Chronologies 3.2 Development of Prehistoric Chronologies 3.3 Stratigraphy 3.4 Seriation 4. Chronometric Dating Methods 4.1 Radiocarbon 4.2 Potassium-argon and Argon-argon Dating 4.3 Dendrochronology 4.4 Archaeomagnetic Dating 4.5 Obsidian Hydration Acknowledgments Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary One of the purposes of archaeological research is the examination of the evolution of human cultures.UNESCO Since a fundamental defini– tionEOLSS of evolution is “change over time,” chronology is a fundamental archaeological parameter. Archaeology shares with a number of otherSAMPLE sciences concerned with temporally CHAPTERS mediated phenomenon the need to view its data within an accurate chronological framework. For archaeology, such a requirement needs to be met if any meaningful understanding of evolutionary processes is to be inferred from the physical residue of past human behavior. 1. Chronological Frameworks Chronology orders the sequential relationship of physical events by associating these events with some type of time scale. Depending on the phenomenon for which temporal placement is required, it is helpful to distinguish different types of time scales. ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) ARCHAEOLOGY – Dating and Chronology Building - R. E. Taylor Geochronological (geological) time scales temporally relates physical structures of the Earth’s solid surface and buried features, documenting the 4.5–5.0 billion year history of the planet.