DOCSLIB.ORG

Husbandry Guidelines for Tawny Frogmouth Podargus Strigoides (Aves: Podargidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Husbandry Guidelines for Tawny Frogmouth Podargus Strigoides (Aves: Podargidae) Husbandry Guidelines for Tawny Frogmouth Podargus strigoides (Aves: Podargidae) Joshua Snow (335286791) 23/02/2008 Western Sydney Institute of TAFE, Richmond Captive Animals Certificate III – RUV30204 Lecturer: Graeme Phipps, Jacki Salkeld, Brad Walker DISCLAIMER The following document contains guidelines, for the care of Tawny Frogmouths (Podargus strigoides) in captivity based on scientific research of wild animals and experience of captive husbandry. The author of the following guidelines and cannot be, and are not, legally, financially or in any other way, responsible for the application of techniques described within this document. When undertaking any procedures or techniques outlined in this document, it is up to individual workers to assess the unique circumstances of their situation, apply common sense, and subsequently apply any procedures or techniques at their own risk. In all cases, the reader of this document are cautioned not to use this handbook as an exact step-by-step guide, but rather as a starting reference point for further work. 2 | Page OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS In captivity the Tawny Frogmouth is generally a very placid bird and can be categorised as Low Risk\Innocuous. However in certain circumstances they may become unafraid of humans and even aggressive at feeding times, swooping at and attempting to bite a keepers head. The beak of a Tawny Frogmouth is broad and has quite a powerful bite. Furthermore the tip of the beak curves down to a sharp point which could break the skin if one is bitten. The greatest danger would be if an aggressive bird were to attack the face of a keeper. This could result in eye damage however it is very rare for a Tawny Frogmouth to display such extreme aggressive behaviour. Many Tawny Frogmouths in captivity require hand feeding. This is due to the fact that Tawny Frogmouths in the wild often use their camouflage and sit still waiting for food to come to them. However in some instances they can be seen hunting flying insects that have been attracted by artificial light sources. The necessity of hand feeding can present risks to the feeder especially if the bird displays aggressive behaviour. Precautions can be taken such as the wearing of leather gloves to prevent a miss directed bite from injuring the keeper. For more aggressive Tawny Frogmouth individuals which fly at the keeper, conditioning can be employed. Such techniques can be as simple as gently picking up the bird off the ground after it has swooped and placing it back on the perch before feeding. In this way after a short period of time the bird will learn that feeding will only take place when it is sitting on its perch. 3 | Page TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 ASMP CATEGORY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 IUCN CATEGORY ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 EA CATEGORY ................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 1.4 NZ AND PNG CATEGORIES AND LEGISLATION ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.5 WILD POPULATION MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................................................................. 9 1.6 SPECIES COORDINATOR ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.7 STUDBOOK HOLDER ....................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2 TAXONOMY................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 NOMENCLATURE ......................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 SUBSPECIES ................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 2.3 RECENT SYNONYMS .................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.4 OTHER COMMON NAMES............................................................................................................................................................ 10 3 NATURAL HISTORY .................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.1 MORPHOMETRICS ....................................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Mass and Basic Body Measurements ....................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.2 Sexual Dimorphism ........................................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1.3 Distinguishing Features .................................................................................................................................................................. 14 3.2 DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT .................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.3 CONSERVATION STATUS ............................................................................................................................................................. 16 3.4 LONGEVITY .................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 3.4.1 In the Wild ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 3.4.2 In Captivity ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 3.4.3 Techniques Used to Determine Age in Adults ...................................................................................................................... 17 4 HOUSING REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 18 4.1 EXHIBIT/ENCLOSURE DESIGN ................................................................................................................................................... 18 4 | Page 4.2 HOLDING AREA DESIGN ............................................................................................................................................................. 19 4.3 SPATIAL REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 4.4 POSITION OF ENCLOSURES ......................................................................................................................................................... 19 4.5 WEATHER PROTECTION ............................................................................................................................................................. 20 4.6 TEMPERATURE REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................................................ 21 4.7 SUBSTRATE .................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 4.8 NEST BOXES AND/OR BEDDING MATERIAL .............................................................................................................................. 22 4.9 ENCLOSURE FURNISHINGS.......................................................................................................................................................... 22 5 GENERAL HUSBANDRY .............................................................................................................................................. 24 5.1 HYGIENE AND CLEANING ............................................................................................................................................................ 24 5.2 RECORD KEEPING ....................................................................................................................................................................... 24 5.3 METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Solomon Islands
    THE SOLOMON ISLANDS 14 SEPTEMBER – 7 OCTOBER 2007 TOUR REPORT LEADER: MARK VAN BEIRS Rain, mud, sweat, steep mountains, shy, skulky birds, shaky logistics and an airline with a dubious reputation, that is what the Solomon Islands tour is all about, but these forgotten islands in the southwest Pacific also hold some very rarely observed birds that very few birders will ever have the privilege to add to their lifelist. Birdquest’s fourth tour to the Solomons went without a hiccup. Solomon Airlines did a great job and never let us down, it rained regularly and we cursed quite a bit on the steep mountain trails, but the birds were out of this world. We birded the islands of Guadalcanal, Rennell, Gizo and Malaita by road, cruised into Ranongga and Vella Lavella by boat, and trekked up into the mountains of Kolombangara, Makira and Santa Isabel. The bird of the tour was the incredible and truly bizarre Solomon Islands Frogmouth that posed so very, very well for us. The fantastic series of endemics ranged from Solomon Sea Eagles, through the many pigeons and doves - including scope views of the very rare Yellow-legged Pigeon and the bizarre Crested Cuckoo- Dove - and parrots, from cockatoos to pygmy parrots, to a biogeographer’s dream array of myzomelas, monarchs and white-eyes. A total of 146 species were seen (and another 5 heard) and included most of the available endemics, but we also enjoyed a close insight into the lifestyle and culture of this traditional Pacific country, and into the complex geography of the beautiful forests and islet-studded reefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Birds in Tilligerry Habitat
    Common Birds in Tilligerry Habitat Dedicated bird enthusiasts have kindly contributed to this sequence of 106 bird species spotted in the habitat over the last few years Kookaburra Red-browed Finch Black-faced Cuckoo- shrike Magpie-lark Tawny Frogmouth Noisy Miner Spotted Dove [1] Crested Pigeon Australian Raven Olive-backed Oriole Whistling Kite Grey Butcherbird Pied Butcherbird Australian Magpie Noisy Friarbird Galah Long-billed Corella Eastern Rosella Yellow-tailed black Rainbow Lorikeet Scaly-breasted Lorikeet Cockatoo Tawny Frogmouth c Noeline Karlson [1] ( ) Common Birds in Tilligerry Habitat Variegated Fairy- Yellow Faced Superb Fairy-wren White Cheeked Scarlet Honeyeater Blue-faced Honeyeater wren Honeyeater Honeyeater White-throated Brown Gerygone Brown Thornbill Yellow Thornbill Eastern Yellow Robin Silvereye Gerygone White-browed Eastern Spinebill [2] Spotted Pardalote Grey Fantail Little Wattlebird Red Wattlebird Scrubwren Willie Wagtail Eastern Whipbird Welcome Swallow Leaden Flycatcher Golden Whistler Rufous Whistler Eastern Spinebill c Noeline Karlson [2] ( ) Common Sea and shore birds Silver Gull White-necked Heron Little Black Australian White Ibis Masked Lapwing Crested Tern Cormorant Little Pied Cormorant White-bellied Sea-Eagle [3] Pelican White-faced Heron Uncommon Sea and shore birds Caspian Tern Pied Cormorant White-necked Heron Great Egret Little Egret Great Cormorant Striated Heron Intermediate Egret [3] White-bellied Sea-Eagle (c) Noeline Karlson Uncommon Birds in Tilligerry Habitat Grey Goshawk Australian Hobby
    [Show full text]
  • Woodland Park Zoo's Baby Boom Continues with New Tawny
    PRESS RELEASE For immediate release | July 23, 2020 Media contact: Gigi Allianic, Meghan Sawyer 206.548.2550 | [email protected] Woodland Park Zoo’s baby boom continues with new tawny frogmouth chick Seattle—This spring and summer have been very productive at Woodland Park Zoo...the newest addition to its baby boom is a tawny frogmouth chick! Other animals born or hatched at the zoo since March include a baby tapir, baby gorilla, agouti pups, penguin chicks, scaly-sided merganser chicks, pudu fawn and mountain goat kid. The new chick represents the 38th frogmouth hatched at the zoo since the species’ first hatching in 2009. The zoo is currently home to seven adult tawny frogmouths. Tawny frogmouths are nocturnal birds native to Australia. During the day, they perch on tree branches, using their cryptic camouflage to blend into their environment. The plumage of the tawny frogmouth is silver-gray, slightly paler below, streaked and mottled with black and rufous. Frogmouths are often mistaken as owls; although they have many habits similar to owls, they are actually more closely related to nightjars and whip-poor-wills, and do not have the strong, curved talons of owls. The new tawny frogmouth chick hatched to first-time parents, both 2 years old. The parents were paired under the Tawny Frogmouth Species Survival Plan, which is a cooperative, conservation breeding program across accredited Association of Zoos & Aquariums (AZA) zoos to help ensure a healthy, self-sustaining population. “This breeding pair is genetically valuable as the parents’ blood lines trace directly back to wild lineages in Australia,” said Mark Myers, bird curator at Woodland Park Zoo and the coordinator for the Tawny Frogmouth Species Survival Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • High Water Light at the End of the Tunnel? Contents 2 Just When You Thought It Was Safe to Go Back in the Water
    SEASONAL NEWSLETTER OF THE FRIENDS OF MOONEE PONDS CREEK AUTUMN 2021 ISSUE 70 High Water Light at the end of the Tunnel? Contents 2 Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water... here we go again! COVID-19 Lockdown number Clean up Australia Day.... 3 three forced the cancellation of the FoMPC February meeting, pushing it back to March 15th. Chain of Ponds News..... 4 Hume News.................... 5 Moonee Valley News...... 6 Moreland News............... 7 Melbourne News............. 8 Waterwatch News .......... 9 MPC History Page........... 10 At least we were able to hold our outdoor AGM and BBQ on January 17th at the Riverside Park, Gowanbrae, Tawny Frogmouths........... 11 when we could elect our new president, John Brosnan Crescent............ 12 Kavanagh. Memberships have increased quite significantly during the year of lockdowns in 2020, so it Sightings.......................... 13 will be good to hold a ‘real’ meeting for the old and the many new members. And who knows, later in the year Down the Drain................. 14 we can get back to planting and other activities! FoMPC News................... 15,16 Woodlands Park News..... 17 Thanks to Kaye Oddie, Anna Lanigan, Lori Arthur, Milly Burke, Melissa Doherty and Julia Cirillo for their assistance with this issue. Cover images of the late January 2021 deluge by Sharon Weedon, Joanne Dietrich, Barbara Czech, Julia Cirillo, Jo Connellan and Roger McMillan. Editor: David Widdowson. Mon-Fri: 8am to 5.30pm Saturday: 9am - 4pm Sunday: 11am - 4pm Clean up Australia Day, Sunday March 7th, 2021 3 https://www.cleanupaustraliaday.org.au/join-a-clean-up Greenvale HUME Attwood Creek Attwood Westmeadows Tullamarine Broadmeadows Gladstone Park Gowanbrae - 09:00 Glenroy Moreland City Council Gowanbrae Meet at the Rotunda, Riverside Park, Adelaide Blvd Westbreen Creek Boeing Reserve Strathmore Heights MVCC 09:00 - 13:00 Oak Park Westbreen Creek, 9:30 - 10:30 Meet: Pagoda, at end of car park, near the community garden Occurs: Monthly Meet at KW Joyce Reserve Pascoe Vale Arndt Road Entrance.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildcare's Tawny Tale
    WILDCARE QUEANBEYAN INC. MEDIA RELEASE – 25 June 2015 ________________________________________________________ Wildcare’s Tawny Tale Mr Stinky is an Australian Tawny Frogmouth (Podargus strigoides), which are found all over Australia. Generally there are three types of frogmouths - the Tawny, the Marbled (found near Brisbane) and the Papuan Frogmouth (occupying the area between Carpentaria and Townsville). Tawny Frogmouths are medium to big birds with a wingspan of 65-98 cm. They live up to 10 years in the wild and are active at night. They are called frogmouths because of their big mouths and they hunt mostly ground dwelling animals, like large insects, spiders, frogs and other small animals. This one is called Mr Stinky for obvious reasons. Frogmouths watch, listen and glide down silently to take their prey on the ground. Wildcare received a call about Mr Stinky in the early hours of an April morning. Mr Stinky was found caught in barbwire on a property in Yass and was quickly rushed to the vets. He had a 3cm rip in his neck area, which had to be sewn up and then treated with antibiotics. Since then he has been in the care of Wildcare waiting the day he can be released back into the wild. As soon as Mr Stingy’s wound has healed completely, and there are no scabs, he will be released back into the wild, as close as possible to the property where he was found. As Mr Stingy’s carer, Elso said, “Wildcare loves looking after native Australian birds and I myself would not do anything else.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Life and Adaptations
    4 Daily life and adaptations Tawny frogmouth behaviour still poses many questions. This and the following chapters are by no means exhaustive but they provide a window into the night and day life of tawny frogmouths. Much is intriguing and unusual about tawny frogmouths. Lifespan and interventions It is not known how long tawny frogmouths actually live in the wild. Banding records of a small sample of 107 recovered birds showed that the oldest was 165 months or 13.75 years of age.1 Some zoo records might have information on lifespan in captivity but this raises further questions. Captivity can have seriously detrimental effects on lifespan (shortening it) or, at times, may prolong life well beyond normal life expectancy in the wild, making the two sets of data not easily comparable. The data on captive tawny frogmouths, as sparse as they are, certainly suggest a potential for a very long lifespan, if one thinks of the recent report from London Zoo of having to euthanase a tawny frogmouth at the age of 32 years. And then there is the individual adult male rescued in 1994 in New South Wales that is still alive in 2017 at the time of writing the revised copy of this book. Getting accurate records of optimal lifespan in the wild is not easy for any species. Many birds die well before they reach reproductive age and even those who survive on their own into adulthood can meet with misadventure, especially in modern society with its many civilisation risks. Tawny frogmouths feeding on 171221 Tawny Frogmouth 2nd Ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Tawny Frogmouth (Podargus Strigoides)
    Bush B Volume 1 u d d i e s Tawny Frogmouth (Podargus strigoides) When it’s not mistaken for an owl, the Tawny Frogmouth can easily be confused with a tree branch! With narrowed eyelids and a stretched neck, this bark-coloured bird is a master of camouflage. Tawny Frogmouths are between 34cm (females) and 53cm (males) long and can weigh up to 680g. Their plumage is mottled grey, white, black and rufous – the feather patterns help them mimic dead tree branches. Their feathers are soft, like those of owls, allowing for stealthy, silent flight. They have stocky heads with big yellow eyes. Stiff bristles surround their beak; these ‘whiskers’ may help detect the movement of flying insects, and/or protect their faces from the bites or stings of distressed prey (this is not known for certain). Their beak is large and wide, hence the name frogmouth. Their genus name, Podargus, is from the Greek work for gout. Why? Unlike owls they don’t have curved talons on their feet; in fact, their feet are small, and they’re said to walk like a gout-ridden man! Their species name, strigoides, means owl-like. They’re nocturnal and carnivorous, but Tawny Frogmouths aren’t owls – they’re more closely related to Nightjars. There are two other species of frogmouth in Australia – the Papuan Frogmouth (Podargus papuensis) lives in the Cape York Peninsula, and the Marbled Frogmouth (P. ocellatus) is found in two well-separated races: one in tropical rainforests in northern Cape York and the A Tawny Frogmouth disguised against the bark of a tree at Naree in NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • An Initial Estimate of Avian Ark Kinds
    Answers Research Journal 6 (2013):409–466. www.answersingenesis.org/arj/v6/avian-ark-kinds.pdf An Initial Estimate of Avian Ark Kinds Jean K. Lightner, Liberty University, 1971 University Blvd, Lynchburg, Virginia, 24515. Abstract Creationists recognize that animals were created according to their kinds, but there has been no comprehensive list of what those kinds are. As part of the Answers in Genesis Ark Encounter project, research was initiated in an attempt to more clearly identify and enumerate vertebrate kinds that were SUHVHQWRQWKH$UN,QWKLVSDSHUXVLQJPHWKRGVSUHYLRXVO\GHVFULEHGSXWDWLYHELUGNLQGVDUHLGHQWLÀHG 'XHWRWKHOLPLWHGLQIRUPDWLRQDYDLODEOHDQGWKHIDFWWKDWDYLDQWD[RQRPLFFODVVLÀFDWLRQVVKLIWWKLVVKRXOG be considered only a rough estimate. Keywords: Ark, kinds, created kinds, baraminology, birds Introduction As in mammals and amphibians, the state of avian $VSDUWRIWKH$UN(QFRXQWHUSURMHFW$QVZHUVLQ WD[RQRP\LVLQÁX['HVSLWHWKHLGHDORIQHDWO\QHVWHG Genesis initiated and funded research in an attempt hierarchies in taxonomy, it seems groups of birds to more clearly identify and enumerate the vertebrate are repeatedly “changing nests.” This is partially NLQGVWKDWZHUHSUHVHQWRQWKH$UN,QDQLQLWLDOSDSHU because where an animal is placed depends on which WKH FRQFHSW RI ELEOLFDO NLQGV ZDV GLVFXVVHG DQG D characteristics one chooses to consider. While many strategy to identify them was outlined (Lightner et al. had thought that molecular data would resolve these 6RPHRIWKHNH\SRLQWVDUHQRWHGEHORZ issues, in some cases it has exacerbated them. For this There is tremendous variety seen today in animal HVWLPDWHRIWKHDYLDQ$UNNLQGVWKHWD[RQRPLFVFKHPH OLIHDVFUHDWXUHVKDYHPXOWLSOLHGDQGÀOOHGWKHHDUWK presented online by the International Ornithologists’ since the Flood (Genesis 8:17). In order to identify 8QLRQ ,28 ZDVXVHG *LOODQG'RQVNHUD which modern species are related, being descendants 2012b and 2013). This list includes information on RI D VLQJOH NLQG LQWHUVSHFLÀF K\EULG GDWD LV XWLOL]HG extant and some recently extinct species.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf of Carpentaria
    newsletter of australian wildlife conservancy wildlife matters SUMMER 2008/09 An historic partnership to save the wildlife of the Gulf of Carpentaria Terry Trewin P. Rothlisberg S. Murphy Lochman Transparencies a u s t r a l i a n w i l d l i f e saving australia’s conservancy threatened wildlife the awc mission Pictograph The mission of Australian Wildlife elcome to the Summer 2008 edition of Wildlife Matters. At a time when global financial Conservancy (AWC) is the effective Wmarkets are in turmoil, I am pleased to provide some very good news about one of your conservation of all Australian animal investments. Australian Wildlife Conservancy (AWC) continues to deliver very strong positive returns. species and the habitats in which they Of course, the value of our assets is not measured in dollars but in terms of the number of native live. To achieve this mission, our actions wildlife species and habitats that are effectively conserved on AWC sanctuaries. In this respect, are focused on: AWC is a market leader, protecting more species of birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians, and their habitats, than any other non-government organisation in Australia. • Establishing a network of sanctuaries Over the last 12 months, we have increased the number of species and habitats that are which protect threatened wildlife and protected by AWC through the acquisition of key sanctuaries in central and northern Australia. ecosystems: AWC now manages 20 However, most importantly, we have continued to deliver effective conservation for species on sanctuaries covering over 2.5 million our sanctuaries through the implementation of practical, on-ground programs targeting feral hectares (6.2 million acres).
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Species Checklist
    Petrels & Shearwaters Darters Hawks & Allies (cont.) Common Diving-Petrel Darter Collared Sparrowhawk Bird Species List Southern Giant Petrel Cormorants Wedge-tailed Eagle Southern Fulmar Little Pied Cormorant Little Eagle Kangaroo Island, SA Cape Petrel Black-faced Cormorant Osprey Kerguelen Petrel Pied Cormorant Brown Falcon Emus Great-winged Petrel Little Black Cormorant Australian Hobby Mainland Emu White-headed Petrel Great Cormorant Black Falcon Megapodes Blue Petrel Pelicans Peregrine Falcon Wild Turkey Mottled Petrel Fiordland Pelican Nankeen Kestrel Australian Brush Turkey Northern Giant Petrel Little Pelican Cranes Game Birds South Georgia Diving Petrel Northern Rockhopper Pelican Brolga Stubble Quail Broad-billed Prion Australian Pelican Rails Brown Quail Salvin's Prion Herons & Allies Buff-banded Rail Indian Peafowl Antarctic Prion White-faced Heron Lewin's Rail Wildfowl Slender-billed Prion Little Egret Baillon's Crake Blue-billed Duck Fairy Prion Eastern Reef Heron Australian Spotted Crake Musk Duck White-chinned Petrel White-necked Heron Spotless Crake Freckled Duck Grey Petrel Great Egret Purple Swamp-hen Black Swan Flesh-footed Shearwater Cattle Egret Dusky Moorhen Cape Barren Goose Short-tailed Shearwater Nankeen Night Heron Black-tailed Native-hen Australian Shelduck Fluttering Shearwater Australasian Bittern Common Coot Maned Duck Sooty Shearwater Ibises & Spoonbills Buttonquail Pacific Black Duck Hutton's Shearwater Glossy Ibis Painted Buttonquail Australasian Shoveler Albatrosses Australian White Ibis Sandpipers
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Aviculture: Identifying Research Needs to Advance the Role of Ex Situ Bird Populations in Conservation Initiatives and Collection Planning
    Review Evidence for Aviculture: Identifying Research Needs to Advance the Role of Ex Situ Bird Populations in Conservation Initiatives and Collection Planning Paul Rose 1,2 1 Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Psychology, University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter, Devon EX4 4QG, UK; [email protected] or [email protected] 2 WWT, Slimbridge Wetland Centre, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire GL2 7BT, UK Simple Summary: Birds of a whole range of species are housed in zoological collections globally; they are some of the most frequently seen of species in animal populations kept under human care. Research output on birds can provide valuable information on how to advance husbandry and care for particular species, which may further feed into conservation planning. Linking birds housed in human care to those in the wild adds value to these zoo-housed populations; this paper provides areas of research that could be conducted to add value to these zoo-housed birds and suggests increasing the conservation focus and conservation relevance of birds housed by humans. Abstract: Birds are the most speciose of all taxonomic groups currently housed in zoos, but this species diversity is not always matched by their inclusion in research output in the peer-reviewed literature. This large and diverse captive population is an excellent tool for research investigation, the findings of which can be relevant to conservation and population sustainability aims. The One Plan Approach to conservation aims to foster tangible conservation relevance of ex situ populations to those animals living in situ. The use of birds in zoo aviculture as proxies for wild-dwelling Citation: Rose, P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rainbow Bird
    The Rainbow Bird Volume 6 Number 1 February 2017 (Issue 89) In this Issue Symbiosis Page 2 Willie Wagtails Page 5 The Sad Death of a Page 6 Kingfisher My Bird Page 8 White-eared Page 9 Honeyeaters Who is Robert Hall? Page 10 Black and White Birds Page 12 Challenge Count 2016 Page 13 Glossy Ibis Page 14 Grey Teal Page 15 Striated Pardalotes Page 16 Sparrowhawks Page 17 Wind beneath their Page 18 Wings Young Spoonbills Page 19 Species Profile Page 20 Hotspot Profile Page 23 1 The Challenge Page 25 Sightings and Calendar Page 26 The Rainbow Bird Photo acknowledgements for title page: Symbiosis Allan Taylor, Lindsay Cupper, Ken Job, Pauline I was recently handed a copy of the Sunraysia Naturalists’ Follett, Richard Wells, Research Trusts’ 1975/76 report by Helen. This will be kept in Finley Japp. the cabinet that holds the books of the Favaloro collection. The report covers a year which seems to be one of the best for sighting birds in recent memory. Part of the report details the Trust members’ observations on the bird nests in the Tapio area just north of Hollands Lake. There were large numbers of White-browed Woodswallow and Masked Woodswallow nests constructed close to each other and to those of Black-faced Cuckoo-Shrikes. Apparently, this behaviour is well-known but I don’t know the reason for it. The article got me thinking about Symbiotic Relationships. When referring to relationships between flora and fauna, it is common to sub-divide these relationships into Mutualistic; Commensalistic; and Parasitic relationships.
    [Show full text]