Advanced Placement European History UNIT # 7 French Revolution/ Age of Napoleon 1789-1815

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Advanced Placement European History UNIT # 7 French Revolution/ Age of Napoleon 1789-1815 Advanced Placement European History UNIT # 7 French Revolution/ Age of Napoleon 1789-1815 Mr. Mansor French Revolution / Napoleonic Age Years: 1789-1815 (The Napoleonic Age was from 1799-1815) Definition: A time of revolution in France when people wanted limits on absolute monarchy of Louis XVI. It would be a long process. Dictator, Napoleon, would rise to power first before a Constitutional Monarchy would emerge. Historic Reasons for the French Revolution 1. Economic crisis since previous century – over – spending, wars, and Louis XV’s “Bubble Era.” Also, helping America with its revolution in 1770’s also drained the economy. 2. Little voice for the people in French politics. Kings were Absolute Monarchs. The Estates-General (Parliament) had not been permitted to meet in 175 years. 3. Commoners paid all the taxes, while the non-tax paying clergy and nobles lived lavishly. 4. Repeated bad harvests. Four Phases of the French Revolution 1. Moderate Phase – National Assembly begins turning France into a Constitutional Monarchy, which limited the kings power/ (1789-1791) 2. Radical Phase – Led to the Reign of Terror. (1792 – 1794) 3. Reaction against Extremism – known as democracy. (1795 – 1799) 4. Age of Napoleon – warfare. (1799 – 1815) 12 Changes of the French Government – 1789 to 1815 1. Louis XVI 2. Louis XVI & Estates-General (3 Estates) 3. Louis XVI & National Assembly (Commoners) 4. Louis XVI & Legislative Assembly (Radical) 5. The National Convention (executes monarch) 6. The Committee of Public Safety (12 men) 7. The Directory (5 men) 8. The Consulate (3 men) 9. First Consul (Napoleon I) 10. The French Parliament (constitutional monarchy under Louis XVIII) 11. Napoleon I (again – his famous 100 days) 12. Louis XVIII again 1 General Background Information Monarch was Louis XVI. His wife was Marie Antoinette, famous for not caring for the poor – said to “Let them find cake to eat.” (Cake is merely Breadcrumbs). Estates General is the 3 house French Parliament (not Parlement, which is the courts). Estate #1 = Clergy (2% of population) Estate #2 = Nobles (2% of population) Estate #3 = Commoners (96% of population) Two of the 3 estates had to agree – estates 1 & 2 always went against commoners This parliament began meeting again during Louis XVI’s reign. He began reigning in 1774. The population of France at this time was 25 million. The King and queen also had a son, Louis XVIII Phase One (1789-1791): Moderate Phase 1789: Due to discontent and rioting, the Estates-General was summoned by Louis XVI for the first time in 175 years. The Estates-General becomes the National Assembly with the 3rd estate (commoners) playing a greater role. June 20 – 27: Tennis Court Oath – The king, clergy, and nobles locked the National Assembly out of the meeting room at Versailles Palace. So, the commoners (3rd estate) met at the palace’s tennis court and vowed not to disband until a constitution was created. Louis XVI finally gave in. July 14, 1789: Storming at the Bastille – became a symbol of French Revolution. Bastille was a prison housing political prisoners in Paris. After much protest from commoners about living conditions, the prison was stormed to free them and look for weapons the government was hiding (though none were found). There were several deaths. July & August, 1789: The Great Fear – Political problems and terrible famine set this off. Nobles’ homes and lands were attacked, but it did die down. It was known as the Great Fear due to rumors of aristocrats planning to attack peasants August 4, 1789: National Assembly ends feudalism’s remnants (the feudal privileges of the nobles). 2 August 26, 1789: Publication of “Declaration of the rights of man,” It was a step toward a Constitution that was based on the USA’s “Declaration of Independence.” Called for male equality, fair tax system, and freedom of religion. October 5, 1789: Women’s March on Versailles – this furthered the cause of the Revolution. The King & Queen were living at Versailles (10 miles from Paris). Women marched to Versailles demanding food and a better life. Also demanded the King’s support of the “Dec. of Rights of Man” and cheap bread in Paris. They wanted Royal Family to return to Paris to hear the daily complaints. The royal family did & spent the next 3 years at Tuilieries Palace. November, 1789: National Assembly confiscated all Church property; the land was sold to raise money February, 1790: Suppression of religious orders and monasteries July 12,1790: “Civil Constitution of the Clergy” written. The state now had the right to influence all religious matters. Convents and monasteries were abolished, the clergy was elected by the citizens and paid by the state, the clergy was forbidden to accept allegiance to the Pope, and the clergy had to take an oath of loyalty to the French government June 21, 1791: Flight to Varennes – Royal Family tries fleeing in disguise to friendlier neighboring nations. They recognized and sent back to Paris to help the needy. Royal Family also thinking of starting a counter-revolutionary army in Varennes. June, 1791: Declaration of Pillintz – Austria and Prussia express their willingness to intervene in France. They feared revolts would spread to their nations. The Austrian king even encouraged overthrowing the French king to being about order. Enirgres – nobles, clergy, and others who fled France and tried to stir up other countries to fight France. Sans-Culottes – working class people who made the revolution more radical. They wanted a “Republic” – government without a king. The National Assembly permitted Jews and Protestants freedom to worship. Catholic Church property and monasteries confiscated to use all collateral for a new paper currency known as “Assignat.” It was to help put France on a more Solid economic track. 3 October, 1791: National Assembly replaced with the Legislative Assembly due to increased economic and revolutionary problems. Girondins in control, but Jacobins make their presence felt. Girondins – wanted to go from a Constitutional Monarchy to a “Republic” – no king. Rural peasants supported them. Jacobins – Radicals against an absolute Monarchy, but did want a Constitutional Monarchy with a weak king and a strong central government (supported by Paris mobs). They moved away from the catholic Church with a new non-Christian calendar, used the metric system, and established price limits on grain. The Mountain – Another name for the Jacobins since they sat on high chairs at the rear of meeting halls. Phase Two (1792 – 1794): Radical Phase 1719: Olympe de Goughes, a feminist, wrote her own “declaration of the rights of Women.” Women were to be equal to men and laws must reflect it. Free communications and all other rights must be adhered to. April 1792: France declares war on Austria and Prussia. Leaders of these nations were influenced by émigrés. Thus, the “Wars of Revolution” began. Sept 2-6, 1792: September Massacres – citizens attacked and killed the clergy and nobles in prisons accused of political offenses. Sept 20, 1792: New ruling body is the national Convention with more radical Jacobins in control. The right to vote is extended to all males (suffrage), not just property owners. Sept 21, 1792: Abolition of Monarchy! France is now a republic. Abolition of all nobility claims, titles, and lands of nobles. It is often referred to as the second Revolution. Oct 25, 1792: All émigrés are banished for life Jan 21, 1793: Execution of king Louis XVI by way of guillotine. Note that his son, Louis XVII, remained uncrowned and died in a dungeon of unknown causes. Feb 1793: National Convention under siege: France at war with more nations like Austria, Prussia, Britain, Netherlands, and Spain. 4 April 1793: National Convention replaced with the committee of public safety with 12 members. “Republic of Virtue” proclaimed to de-christianize France. Maximilian Robespierre (1 of the 12 in leadership) stood out. He was a Jacobin that believed terror was needed to punish traitors. He also abolished slavery in colonies. June 1793: The Girondins are overthrown July 1793-Jul 1794: Reign of Terror: Led by Robespierre and 40,000 people were killed, including many clergy and nobles. The guillotine had been created to make executions easier. Things became uncontrollable, so Robespierre was executed for being so extreme on July 28, 1794. This was known as the Thermidorian Reaction (Thermidorian was the new calendar month of Julyaaa0. Apart of this reaction was to return moderates to government (August 18 to Sept 16). It was the reassertion of authority by the respected bourgeoisie. Oct 16, 1793: Execution of Queen Marie Antoinette Dec 1794; Girondins reenter the government Phase Three (1795-1799): Reaction Against Extremism 1795: New Constitution drawn up. Also a five man leadership now takes over known as the Directory, replacing the Committee of Public Safety. Also, a 2-house Legislature (1795-1799) was created. The problem now was government corruption. A military hero, Napoleon Bonaparte, was to help the Directory rule. He would backstab them. Oct 1795: Amnesty for political detainees Amnesty – freedom from jail for those being detained by the former King. Nov 1795: Until 1799, the Directory suppressed the sans-culottes. 1799: Napoleon’s Coup d”etat (violent overthrow of the government). He got rid of the Directory. Napoleon was born in Corsica, which then belonged to Italy. France possessed Corsica when Napoleon was only one year old. 5 Phase Four years (1799-1815): Napoleonic Age Nov 9, 1799: Three Man Consulate that include Napoleon takes over, them Napoleon ruled solo as the First Consul. Napoleon then called himself “emperor.” Dec 1799: Plebiscite in which French a new (4th) constitution. Plebiscite is a ballot held for voters. Napoleon used this to gain support and stop the street fighting.
Recommended publications
  • REVOLUTION GOES EAST Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University
    REVOLUTION GOES EAST Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University The Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute of Columbia University were inaugu rated in 1962 to bring to a wider public the results of significant new research on modern and contemporary East Asia. REVOLUTION GOES EAST Imperial Japan and Soviet Communism Tatiana Linkhoeva CORNELL UNIVERSITY PRESS ITHACA AND LONDON This book is freely available in an open access edition thanks to TOME (Toward an Open Monograph Ecosystem)—a collaboration of the Association of American Universities, the Association of University Presses, and the Association of Research Libraries—and the generous support of New York University. Learn more at the TOME website, which can be found at the following web address: openmono graphs.org. The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International: https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0. To use this book, or parts of this book, in any way not covered by the license, please contact Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. Visit our website at cornellpress. cornell.edu. Copyright © 2020 by Cornell University First published 2020 by Cornell University Press Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Linkhoeva, Tatiana, 1979– author. Title: Revolution goes east : imperial Japan and Soviet communism / Tatiana Linkhoeva. Description: Ithaca [New York] : Cornell University Press, 2020. | Series: Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2019020874 (print) | LCCN 2019980700 (ebook) | ISBN 9781501748080 (pbk) | ISBN 9781501748097 (epub) | ISBN 9781501748103 (pdf) Subjects: LCSH: Communism—Japan—History—20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • The English Republic
    72 The English Republic DOROTHY THOMPSON By the second half of the eighteenth century, England must have seemed the European country most likely to dispense with monarchical and aristo- cratic government. English kings had been by-passed, dethroned, even decapitated for the protection of the protestant faith and the sanctity of parliamentary government. Legitmacy in English monarchs came second to adhesion to acceptable political and religious views. The ruling house of Hanover was unpopular with many sections of the populace, a populace notorious for its and unruly and levelling behaviour. A cheap and expanding press fed a sophisticated and organised public opinion among the lower orders. In 1779 increasing concern with political and clerical authority errupted into major riots against catholic relief and against the refusal of parliament to modify the relief bill in response to mass petitioning. The riots, which took the name of the instigator of the petitions, Lord George Gordon, also took in attacks on poll booths and prisons, the symbols of state power. Two hundred people perished in the military confrontation by which the rioters were brought to heel, and other European states, particularly France, where central control and policing were more powerful, looked on in horror. By the opening of the twentieth century, however, the death of a monarch brought hundreds of thousands of mourners into the streets in England, and by the close of that century Britain was one among a group of north European countries in which a stable democracy existed under a monarchical system. It is one of the curious aspects of British history that there has not been in England, at least since the seventeenth century, a republican party.
    [Show full text]
  • Republicanism in Nineteenth Century England
    NORBERT J. GOSSMAN REPUBLICANISM IN NINETEENTH CENTURY ENGLAND To one familiar with the attitude of "near devotion" accorded the monarchy by the majority of Englishmen today, it may come as a shock to discover a lack of this devotion in mid-Victorian England. A sampling of comments from the radical press is a striking example. Trie-regular arrival of Victoria's progeny evoked this impious sug­ gestion in the Northern Star: That, rather than reciting national prayers of thanksgiving, congregations should sing "hymns of despair for their misfortune in being saddled with another addition to the brood of royal Cormorants." 1 The National Reformer referred to "our good kind, and dear Queen, who... could easily dispense with the allowance which her loyal subjects make her... unless she desires to be the last of England's monarchs..." 2 Yet criticism of Victoria was mild in comparison with the criticism directed toward her immediate predecessors. Upon the death of George IV in June 1830, the Times had the following comment: "The truth is... that there never was an individual less regretted by his fellow- creatures than this deceased King... If George IV ever had a friend, a devoted friend - in any rank of life - we protest that the name of him or her has not yet reached us." 3 This attitude toward the monarchy can be explained partly by the personalities of some of the Hanoverians - George IV, for example, 4 partly by objections to the growing expense of monarchy, but it might also be explained by the feeling in some radical circles that the institution of monarchy was incompatible with the growth of demo­ cracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 544 H-France Review Vol. 3 (October 2003), No. 124 DMG
    H-France Review Volume 3 (2003) Page 544 H-France Review Vol. 3 (October 2003), No. 124 D.M.G. Sutherland , The French Revolution and Empire: The Quest for a Civic Order . Malden, Mass., Oxford, Melbourne, and Berlin: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. viii + 424 pp. Map, bibliography, and index. $27.95 U.S. (pb). ISBN 0-631-23363-6. Review by Tracey Rizzo, University of North Carolina at Asheville. D.M.G. Sutherland’s new book, The French Revolution and Empire: The Quest for a Civic Order , is a richer version of his earlier textbook, France; 1789-1815 (Oxford, 1986) in which he presented a compelling case for an interpretation of the Revolution that placed provincial and rural life at the center of the story. He continues to insist that “every crisis of the Revolution after 1789 had its origin in the provinces” (p. 74). Readers will be convinced even more in this edition, which has been augmented with more powerful quotes and updated statistics. Moreover, the author indicates that most of the book has been rewritten, a reflection of the extensive outpouring of new work, including his own recently published in Histoire et Mesure (with T.J.A. Le Goff). The Quest for a Civic Order is a provocative new subtitle for a work that essentially resembles its predecessor in structure and content. Organized chronologically, this book integrates the “revolution and counter-revolution” (the previous edition’s subtitle) in every chapter, thus conveying the degree to which “the vast weight of ancient peasant France,” a sparkling phrase from the last sentence of the first edition, “imposed itself upon the government, at the expense of many of the ideals of 1789" (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Volker Sellin European Monarchies from 1814 to 1906
    Volker Sellin European Monarchies from 1814 to 1906 Volker Sellin European Monarchies from 1814 to 1906 A Century of Restorations Originally published as Das Jahrhundert der Restaurationen, 1814 bis 1906, Munich: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2014. Translated by Volker Sellin An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License, as of February 23, 2017. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. ISBN 978-3-11-052177-1 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-052453-6 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-052209-9 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Cover Image: Louis-Philippe Crépin (1772–1851): Allégorie du retour des Bourbons le 24 avril 1814: Louis XVIII relevant la France de ses ruines. Musée national du Château de Versailles. bpk / RMN - Grand Palais / Christophe Fouin. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Contents Introduction 1 France1814 8 Poland 1815 26 Germany 1818 –1848 44 Spain 1834 63 Italy 1848 83 Russia 1906 102 Conclusion 122 Bibliography 126 Index 139 Introduction In 1989,the world commemorated the outbreak of the French Revolution two hundred years earlier.The event was celebratedasthe breakthrough of popular sovereignty and modernconstitutionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 H-France Forum, V
    H-France Forum Volume 4 Page 50 ______________________________________________________________________________ H-France Forum, Volume 4, Issue 2 (Spring 2009), No. 5 Michael Sonenscher, Sans-Culottes: An Eighteenth-Century Emblem in the French Revolution. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008. x + 493 pp. $45.00 U.S. (cl). ISBN 978- 0691124988. Response Essay by Michael Sonenscher, King’s College Cambridge, to the review essays of his book by John Hardman, Thomas E. Kaiser, Charles Walton and Johnson Kent Wright. Perhaps the easiest way to begin a reply to this array of thought-provoking comments is to start with the two factual questions raised by John Hardman. The first concerns the comte d’Angiviller, while the second concerns Charles-Alexandre de Calonne. Answering them is a good way into the questions set out by Thomas E. Kaiser and Charles Walton about the relationship of the sans-culottes to Robespierre, Saint-Just and the Jacobin leadership in 1793 and 1794 and, more broadly, about the similarities and differences in their respective moral values, economic priorities and political visions. Answering their questions is, in turn, a helpful entry point to the questions about eighteenth-century versions of ancient moral and political thought and about the politics of the ancient constitution raised by Johnson Kent Wright. John Hardman asked whether I had any evidence that the comte d’Angiviller was, as I put it, “a strong advocate of a patriotic coup against the nation’s creditors in 1787 and 1788” (p. 378). I made the claim on the basis of a remark by d’Angiviller in the autobiographical fragment entitled Episodes de ma vie that was published posthumously in 1906.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo in Myth and Memory: the Battles of Waterloo 1815-1915 Timothy Fitzpatrick
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2013 Waterloo in Myth and Memory: The Battles of Waterloo 1815-1915 Timothy Fitzpatrick Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES WATERLOO IN MYTH AND MEMORY: THE BATTLES OF WATERLOO 1815-1915 By TIMOTHY FITZPATRICK A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2013 Timothy Fitzpatrick defended this dissertation on November 6, 2013. The members of the supervisory committee were: Rafe Blaufarb Professor Directing Dissertation Amiée Boutin University Representative James P. Jones Committee Member Michael Creswell Committee Member Jonathan Grant Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For my Family iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Drs. Rafe Blaufarb, Aimée Boutin, Michael Creswell, Jonathan Grant and James P. Jones for being on my committee. They have been wonderful mentors during my time at Florida State University. I would also like to thank Dr. Donald Howard for bringing me to FSU. Without Dr. Blaufarb’s and Dr. Horward’s help this project would not have been possible. Dr. Ben Wieder supported my research through various scholarships and grants. I would like to thank The Institute on Napoleon and French Revolution professors, students and alumni for our discussions, interaction and support of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the Revolution
    Jean-Jacques Jean-Jacques Rousseau Rousseau etla and the Revolution Revolution Actes du Colloque de Proceedings of the Montreal (25-28 mai 1989) Montreal Symposium publies et (25-28 May 1989) presentes par edited by Jean Roy Pensee libre, nO 3 Association nord-am~ricaine des ~tudes Jean-Jacques Rousseau North American Association for the Study of Jean-Jacques Rousseau Ottawa 1991 Ouvrage publi6 grilce au concours de I' Association nord-am6ricaine des 6tudes Jean-Jacques Rousseau, gdce ?l une subvention du Conseil de recherche en sciences humaines du Canada. et griice fll'aide de la Facult6 des arts et sciences de l'Universit6 de Montreal. The publication of this volume was made possible by the co-operation of the North American Association for the Study of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. and by the support of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences of the University of Montreal. © Association nord-am6ricaine des etudes Jean-Jacques Rousseau I North American Association for the Study of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 1991. ISBN 0-9693132-2-5 Printed in Canada FROM VINCENNES TO VARENNES Two turning-points: October 1749. in the life of Rousseau. the illumina­ tion on the road to Vincennes when he ceases to be a bright young intellectual of the Enlightenment seeking fame and fortune on the ladder of the ancien regime to become a radical critic of both the ancien regime and the Enlightenment; June 1791. in the history of the French Revol­ ution, when the King's flight to Varennes dooms all prospects of Prance being remodelled as a constitutional monarchy inspired to a large extent by Montesquieu and ushers in a period of republicanism inspired to a large extent by Rousseau.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Notes of the French Revolution, Part I – the Royal Assignats
    BANK NOTES OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION, PART I – THE ROYAL ASSIGNATS John E. Sandrock Prelude to Revolution Conditions in France under the monarchy at the end of the eighteenth century were bad both economically and socially. The monarchy was supreme, ruling by Divine Right. As a result, there being no parliament or other body to act as a check on extremes, the king was responsible only to himself. Although Louis XVI meant well, he was sluggish and ignorant when it came to domestic and foreign affairs. His love of hunting and his passion for tinkering with locks consumed his concentration. The problems associated with statesmanship were beyond his grasp. To make matters worse his Austrian born wife, Marie Antoinette, was both frivolous and erratic without any understanding of her subjects or their plight. France at this time was an agrarian nation with all but a small percentage of the population working the land. Crops had been very poor for several years and the winter hail storms of 1788-1789 was uncommonly severe. This made the collection of taxes, always an onerous chore which was badly administered, much more difficult. When we add to this the agrarian troubles, continual unbalanced budgets, foreign trade stifled for lack of credit, and a monarchy unable to raise money due to its bad credit, we have the grounds for bankruptcy. Transcending all this was a bureaucracy where privilege was rife. An enormous amount of wealth (some say up to twenty-five percent) was tied up in the hands of the church and clergy. Soon many writers began to attack the outmoded privileges and abuses of the aristocracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pitiful King: Tears, Blood, and Family in Revolutionary Royalism
    The Pitiful King: Tears, Blood, and Family in Revolutionary Royalism Victoria Murano Submitted to Professors Lisa Jane Graham and Linda Gerstein In partial fulfillment of the requirement of History 400: Senior Thesis Seminar Murano 1 Abstract When the French Revolution erupted in 1789, revolutionaries strove to foster a sense of freedom of expression, guaranteeing a brief freedom of the press. The eleventh article of the 1791 Declaration of the Rights of Man asserts that “The free communication of thoughts and opinions is one of man’s most precious rights; all citizens may therefore speak, write, print freely, except to answer for the abuse of this liberty in cases determined by law.” However, as France became further embroiled in the Revolution, it abandoned its allegiance to the universality of these rights, propagating pro-republican thought, and persecuting anyone who did not share these views. The royalist press was a major concern to the new republican government, because it continued to speak out in support of the king and criticize the Revolution. The existence of royalist journalists and writers thus posed a problem for revolutionaries who wanted to establish a monolithically-minded republic. Therefore, over time, they enacted repressive censorship and punishment to crack down on royalist sympathizers. Although they sent many royalist writers to prison or the guillotine, the revolutionaries ultimately failed to silence their political enemies. This thesis uses newspapers, images, and other printed media to explore royalist coverage of three events that diminished royal power: Louis XVI’s flight to Varennes in June 1791, his execution in January 1793, and the death of his nine-year-old son and heir, Louis XVII, in June 1795.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abolition of Monarchy and Constitution Making in Nepal
    THE KING VERSUS THE PEOPLE(BHANDARI) Article THE KING VERSUS THE PEOPLE: THE ABOLITION OF MONARCHY AND CONSTITUTION MAKING IN NEPAL Surendra BHANDARI Abstract The abolition of the institution of monarchy on May 28, 2008 marks a turning point in the political and constitutional history of Nepal. This saga of constitutional development exemplifies the systemic conflict between people’s’ aspirations for democracy and kings’ ambitions for unlimited power. With the abolition of the monarchy, the process of making a new constitution for the Republic of Nepal has started under the auspices of the Constituent Assembly of Nepal. This paper primarily examines the reasons or causes behind the abolition of monarchy in Nepal. It analyzes the three main reasons for the abolition of monarchy. First, it argues that frequent slights and attacks to constitutionalism by the Nepalese kings had brought the institution of the monarchy to its end. The continuous failures of the early democratic government and the Supreme Court of Nepal in bringing the monarchy within the constitutional framework emphatically weakened the fledgling democracy, but these failures eventually became fatal to the monarchical institution itself. Second, it analyzes the indirect but crucial role of India in the abolition of monarchy. Third, it explains the ten-year-long Maoist insurgency and how the people’s movement culminated with its final blow to the monarchy. Furthermore, this paper also analyzes why the peace and constitution writing process has yet to take concrete shape or make significant process, despite the abolition of the monarchy. Finally, it concludes by recapitulating the main arguments of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline (PDF)
    Timeline of the French Revolution 1789 1793 May 5 Estates General convened in Versailles Jan. 21 Execution of Louis XVI (and later, Marie Jun. 17 National Assembly Antoinette on Oct. 16) Jun. 20 Tennis Court Oath Feb. 1 France declares war on British and Dutch (and Jul. 11 Necker dismissed on Spain on Mar. 7) Jul. 13 Bourgeois militias in Paris Mar. 11 Counterrevolution starts in Vendée Jul. 14 Storming of the Bastille in Paris (official start of Apr. 6 Committee of Public Safety formed the French Revolution) Jun. 1-2 Mountain purges Girondins Jul. 16 Necker recalled Jul. 13 Marat assassinated Jul. 20 Great Fear begins in the countryside Jul. 27 Maximilien Robespierre joins CPS Aug. 4 Abolition of feudalism Aug. 10 Festival of Unity and Indivisibility Aug. 26 Declaration of Rights of Man and the Citizen Sept. 5 Terror the order of the day Oct. 5 Adoption of Revolutionary calendar 1791 1794 Jun. 20-21 Flight to Varennes Aug. 27 Declaration of Pillnitz Jun. 8 Festival of the Supreme Being Jul. 27 9 Thermidor: fall of Robespierre 1792 1795 Apr. 20 France declares war on Austria (and provokes Prussian declaration on Jun. 13) Apr. 5/Jul. 22 Treaties of Basel (Prussia and Spain resp.) Sept. 2-6 September massacres in Paris Oct. 5 Vendémiare uprising: “whiff of grapeshot” Sept. 20 Battle of Valmy Oct. 26 Directory established Sept. 21 Convention formally abolishes monarchy Sept. 22 Beginning of Year I (First Republic) 1797 Oct. 17 Treaty of Campoformio Nov. 21 Berlin Decree 1798 1807 Jul. 21 Battle of the Pyramids Aug.
    [Show full text]