The London Gazette, I?Th September 1987
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Migrant Workers in Rochdale and Oldham Scullion, LC, Steele, a and Condie, J
Migrant workers in Rochdale and Oldham Scullion, LC, Steele, A and Condie, J Title Migrant workers in Rochdale and Oldham Authors Scullion, LC, Steele, A and Condie, J Type Monograph URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/9261/ Published Date 2008 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Migrant Workers in Rochdale and Oldham Final report Lisa Hunt, Andy Steele and Jenna Condie Salford Housing & Urban Studies Unit University of Salford August 2008 About the Authors Lisa Hunt is a Research Fellow in the Salford Housing & Urban Studies Unit (SHUSU) at the University of Salford. Andy Steele is Professor of Housing & Urban Studies and Director of the Salford Housing & Urban Studies Unit (SHUSU) at the University of Salford. Jenna Condie is a Research Assistant in the Salford Housing & Urban Studies Unit (SHUSU) at the University of Salford. The Salford Housing & Urban Studies Unit is a dedicated multi-disciplinary research and consultancy unit providing a range of services relating to housing and urban management to public and private sector clients. The Unit brings together researchers drawn from a range of disciplines including: social policy, housing management, urban geography, environmental management, psychology, social care and social work. -
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for Cabinet, 30/11/2015 18:15
Legal & Governance Reform David Wilcock Head of Legal and Governance Reform Governance & Committee Services Floor 2, Number One Riverside, Smith Street, Rochdale, OL16 1XU Phone: 01706 647474 Website: www.rochdale.gov.uk To: All Members of the Cabinet Enquiries to: Mark Hardman Telephone: 01706 924704 Date: Friday, 20 November 2015 Dear Councillor Cabinet You are requested to attend the meeting of the Cabinet to be held in Training and Conference Suite, First Floor, Number One Riverside, Smith Street, Rochdale, OL16 1XU on Monday, 30 November 2015 commencing at 6.15 pm. The agenda and supporting papers are attached. If you require advice on any agenda item involving a possible Declaration of Interest which could affect your right to speak and/or vote, please refer to the Code of Conduct or contact the Monitoring Officer or Deputies or staff in the Governance and Committee Services Team at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. Yours Faithfully David Wilcock Head of Legal and Governance Reform Cabinet Membership 2015/16 Councillor Iftikhar Ahmed Councillor Daalat Ali Councillor Jacqueline Beswick Councillor Allen Brett Councillor Neil Emmott Councillor Janet Emsley Councillor Richard Farnell Councillor Donna Martin E Councillor Peter Williams Rochdale Borough Council CABINET Monday, 30 November 2015 at 6.15 pm Training and Conference Suite, First Floor, Number One Riverside, Smith Street, Rochdale, OL16 1XU A G E N D A Apologies for Absence 1. Declarations of Interest Members must indicate at this stage any items on the agenda in which they must declare an interest. Members must verbally give notice of their interest at the meeting and complete the form attached with this agenda. -
Northern Gateway Area GMA 1.2 - Ecological Constraints and Opportunities: High-Level Walkover A104444-7
Northern Gateway Area GMA 1.2 - Ecological Constraints and Opportunities: High-Level Walkover A104444-7 June 2021 Prepared by WYG Environment Planning Transport Limited On behalf of Northern Gateway Development Vehicle LLP. Quay West at MediaCityUK, Trafford Wharf Road, Trafford Park, Manchester, M17 1HH Tel: +44 (0)161 872 3223 Fax: +44 (0)161 872 3193 Email: Website: www.wyg.com WYG Environment Planning Transport Limited. Registered in England & Wales Number: 03050297 Registered Office: 3 Sovereign Square, Sovereign Street, Leeds, LS1 4ER Northern Gateway – High-Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.2 Document control A104444-7 June 2021 www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands Northern Gateway – High-Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.2 Document: Area GMA 1.2 - Ecological Constraints and Opportunities: High-Level Walkover Project: Northern Gateway Client: Northern Gateway Development Vehicle LLP Job Number: A104444-7 File Origin: A104444-7/Reports/GMA 1.2 Revision: 0 Date: December 2019 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Jessica Yorke Phil Preston MCIEEM Rachel Kerr MCIEEM GradCIEEM Principal Ecologist CEnv Associate Consultant Ecologist Ecologist Description of revision: First Issue Revision: 1 Date: July 2020 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Candice Howe MCIEEM Laura Holmes MCIEEM Phil Preston MCIEEM Senior Ecologist Principal Ecologist Principal Ecologist Description of revision: Update following high-level walkover survey undertaken in June 2020 and addressing client’s comments. Revision: 2 Date: September 2020 A104444-7 June 2021 www.wyg.com -
Heywood Notes & Queries
HEYWOOD NOTES & QUERIES. Reprinted fione the "Heywood Advertiser ." CONDUCTED BY J . A. GREEN. VOL. III . No. 25. ,,jFriba1, 3aiuuarp 11th, 1902 . [242.] JOHN KAY TAYLOR . (See Note No. 152 .) Since the publication of the particulars given at No. 152, I have been favoured with the loan of a little book which contains addi- tional information . It is entitled : A New selection of Hymns, compiled for the use of the Chartists, of Great Britain and Ireland . Selected, arranged, and published under the superintendence of a committee ap- pointed by the Chartist Delegates of South Lancashire . Manchester : J . Leach, printer, 40, Oak-street, Swan-street . [ ] 32 me. pp . 1- At this time of day it is difficult to believe that groups of men would unite in singing some of the "hymns" collected in this book . Ii a man is known by the company he keeps then Taylor is found here in very good com- pany indeed . The best hymns are by Burns, Campbell, Ebenez .r Elliott, Thomas Cooper, 2 and Robert Nicoll . The contributions of J. K. Taylor are not the worst in the book, but the following samples of his quality will suffice : - Hymn, 3-page 5 . Chartist Hymn (S.M.). 1 What can withstand the power, When Britain's sons unite, Throughout this empire in one hour, For to assert their right. (4 stanzas, signed J. K. Taylor, Heywood.) Hymn, 14-page 18. Chartists' Hymn (P.M.). 1 Come join the patriot's host, The contest now begun, Let each and all maintain his post And labour's battle's won. -
Places for Everyone 2021 Statement of Consultation
Places for Everyone 2021 Statement of Consultation July 2021 Places for Everyone 2021 Statement of Consultation Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 2. Comparison of policy prefixes names and numbers between GMSF 2020 and PfE 2021 ............................................................................................................................. 8 PART A – Summary of Consultations .............................................................................. 14 2.1. Statement of Community Involvement Compliance .................................................... 14 2.2. Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Scoping survey 2014 ................................... 14 2.3. Draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Vision, Objectives and Options, Winter 2015/16 ...................................................................................................................... 14 2.4. Draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework, Winter 2016/2017 ............................... 21 2.5. The Plan for Jobs, Homes and the Environment (GMSF) January to March 2019 ...... 26 PART B - The Plan for Jobs, Homes and Environment (Revised Draft GMSF) (2019) Consultation Report ................................................................................................. 29 3.1. Thematic Policies ....................................................................................................... 32 3.1.1. Context of GMSF .......................................................................................... -
Northern Gateway Area GMA 1.2 - Archaeology and Heritage A104444-7
Northern Gateway Area GMA 1.2 - Archaeology and Heritage A104444-7 June 2021 Prepared by WYG Environment Planning Transport Limited On behalf of Northern Gateway Development Vehicle LLP 90 Victoria Street, Bristol, BS1 6DPEmail: Website: www.wyg.com WYG Environment Planning Transport Limited. Registered in England & Wales Number: 03050297 Registered Office: 3 Sovereign Square, Sovereign Street, Leeds, LS1 4ER Northern Gateway – Archaeology and Heritage High Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.2 Document control Document: Area G1.2 – Archaeology and Heritage High Level Constraints Volume 1 Project: Northern Gateway Client: Northern Gateway Development Vehicle LLP Job Number: A104444-5 File Origin: A104444-5/Reports/Draft/Volume 1 Revision: 0 Date: January 2020 Prepared by: Checked by: Danielle Farrar (PCIfA), Samantha Hilton (PCIfA), Archaeological Consultant Archaeological Consultant Approved By: Nigel Mann, Director Description of revision: First Issue Revision: 1 Date: February 2020 Prepared by: Checked by: Danielle Farrar (PCIfA), Samantha Hilton (PCIfA), Archaeological Consultant Archaeological Consultant Approved By: Nigel Mann, Director Description of revision: Update following client comments Revision: 2 Date: 17 September 2020 Prepared by: Checked by: Martin Brown, Associate Samantha Hilton (PCIfA), Archaeological Consultant Approved By: Nigel Mann, Director Description of revision: Update following client comments A104444-5 June 2021 www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands Northern Gateway – Archaeology and Heritage High Level Constraints -
H. Report on Consultation on Preferred Options Core Strategy
Rochdale Core Strategy Report on Consultation on Preferred Options Local Development Framework November 2010 Report on responses on the Rochdale Core Strategy Preferred Options Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. SCHEDULE A 3 3. SCHEDULE B 27 4. TOWNSHIP MEETING NOTES 281 1. INTRODUCTION This report includes the representations received on the Core Strategy Preferred Options Report which was published for consultation in October 2009 . It includes the representations in full as they have been submitted against the policies/questions in the Preferred Options report. In some cases representations have been made against a particular policy or question but which are also relevant to others. Consequently, we have attempted to move them to the most appropriate place. In a limited number of cases, representations appear in more than one place. Against each representation, there is an officer response/action. It should be noted that the officer response was recorded as an initial response following receipt of the objections in order to identify the need or otherwise for changes. In some cases, the response refers to the need for further consideration and refinement without stating an actual change. All comments have now been considered. The response is standardised to state if the representation is: • Noted (may require further consideration but no specific change identified) • Support Noted (no specific change necessary) • Disagree (followed by a short explanation); and • Agree (followed by a short explanation or proposed change) It should be noted that all representations were considered based on the structure of the Preferred Options Report. In some cases the policy names and numbers have changed between the Preferred Options Report and the Publication Draft Core Strategy. -
Rochdale Built Facilities Strategy
Rochdale Indoor and Built Sports Facilities Strategy 2019 – 2029 November 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 2. Strategic Context ................................................................................................................... 6 3. Local Context....................................................................................................................... 19 4. Assessment of Need and Evidence Base – Sports Halls ........................................................... 48 5. Assessment of Need and Evidence Base – Swimming ............................................................. 63 6. Assessment of Need and Evidence Base – Health and Fitness ................................................. 68 7. Sport Specific Requirements & Opportunities ......................................................................... 78 8. Interpretation of Findings - Quantity, Quality, Accessibility and Availability ............................ 153 9. Strategy and Action Plan .................................................................................................... 166 APPENDICES Appendix A – Rochdale Performance Benchmarking Report Appendix B – Local Strategic Policy Review Appendix C – Sports Halls Facility Planning National Run Report Appendix D – Swimming Pool Facility Planning National Run Report Basis of Information It is not possible to guarantee the fulfilment of any estimates or -
GM1.2 – Simister/Bowlee Topic Paper October 2020
GM1.2 – Simister/Bowlee Topic Paper October 2020 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 Site Details .............................................................................................................................. 2 Proposed Development ........................................................................................................... 2 Site Selection .......................................................................................................................... 3 Planning History ...................................................................................................................... 4 GMSF 2019 Consultation Responses...................................................................................... 4 GMSF 2019 Integrated Assessment ........................................................................................ 5 Transport ................................................................................................................................. 7 Flood Risk and Drainage ......................................................................................................... 8 Ground Conditions ................................................................................................................ 10 Utilities .................................................................................................................................. 11 Telecommunications -
ALT Final Report
Oldham Rochdale HMR Pathfinder Heritage Assessment ALT Final Report March 2008 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1 2 METHODOLOGY .........................................................................................................5 3 PLANNING & REGENERATION CONTEXT ..............................................................13 4 THE ALT AREA ..........................................................................................................20 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................41 APPENDICES A Project Brief B Consultation Report (See Separate Cover) MAPS (SEPARATE) 01 Historic Framework 02 Historic Development 03 Heritage Value Research and text by Richard Morriss of Richard K Morriss & Associates, with Mike Dawson of CgMS and Chris Garrand of the Christopher Garrand Consultancy. Public consultation and reporting led by Jon Phipps of Lathams (project director). Mapping, graphics and photography by Mark Lucy, Sarah Jenkins and Tom Mason of Lathams, with Chris Garrand and Bibiana Omar Zajtai. © Lathams, 2008 Document produced in partnership with: Oldham Rochdale HMR Pathfinder Heritage Assessment ALT 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Introduction 1.01 BACKGROUND Lathams: Urban Design in association with the Christopher Garrand Consultancy, Richard K. Morriss & Associates, and CgMS have been commissioned to undertake a series of heritage assessments of the Oldham Rochdale -
History of Philips Park
Philips Park: Its history and development – Version 6 _________________________________________________________________________________________ Philips Park: Its history and development By Sara Gremson, Ian Pringle and Diana Winterbotham - 1 - Philips Park: Its history and development – Version 6 _________________________________________________________________________________________ Contents 1. Site introduction 1.1 Geology and Geomorphology 1.2 Biodiversity 2. Pre-Philips history 2.1 Prehistoric 2.2 Roman 2.3 Anglo Saxon and Viking 2.4 Medieval 2.5 Post-medieval 3. Robert Philips 3.1 Acquisition of the park 3.2 His background 3.3 His business and political interests 3.4 His family and social circle 3.5 His development of buildings 3.6 His development of parkland 4. Mark and Robert Needham Philips 5.1 Their upbringing 5.2 Their business and political interests 5.3 Their families and social circles 5.4 Their development of buildings and parkland 5.5 The ‘other’ Philips Park 5. Anna Maria Philips 5.1 Her upbringing 5.2 Her interests and social circles 5.3 Her development of buildings and parkland 6. Prestwich and Whitefield municipal park era 7. Bury Council era and plans for the future 8. Chronology: Significant local and national events 9. Sources of information The authors thank Chris Wilkinson in Bury Council’s Environment and Development Services Department for his help in editing, formatting and generally encouraging the production of this booklet. - 2 - Philips Park: Its history and development – Version 6 _________________________________________________________________________________________ Introduction Philips Park has been a public park for a mere 60 Barn has an imposing tombstone in the churchyard years. For the previous 150 years it was the private at Prestwich reflecting the regard in which he was estate of 3 generations of the Philips family of held by his fellow botanists, and James Percival and Manchester-based manufacturers and merchants. -
10.01.55 JPA1.2 Simister and Bowlee (Northern Gateway) Allocation Topic Paper.Pdf
Places for Everyone JPA1.2 Simister and Bowlee Allocation Topic Paper July 2021 Contents Section A – Background ............................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Simister/Bowlee Allocation Overview .............................................................................. 6 3.0 Site Details ..................................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Proposed Development .................................................................................................. 7 5.0 Site Selection .................................................................................................................. 8 6.0 Planning History ........................................................................................................... 11 7.0 GMSF 2019 Consultation Responses ........................................................................... 11 8.0 GMSF 2019 Integrated Assessment ............................................................................. 12 9.0 GMSF 2020 Integrated Assessment ............................................................................. 14 10.0 PfE 2021 Integrated Appraisal Addendum ....................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Section B – Physical ..................................................................................................................