The Ohio Company of Virginia, Empire Building, and The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
COMPANY, COLONY, AND CROWN: THE OHIO COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, EMPIRE BUILDING, AND THE SEVEN YEARS’ WAR, 1747-1763 A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Emily Hager Kasecamp December 2019 ©Copyright All right reserved Except for previously published materials A dissertation written by Emily Hager Kasecamp B.A., Frostburg State University, 2009 M.A., West Virginia University, 2011 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2019 Approved by Dr. Kim Gruenwald , Chair. Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Kevin Adams , Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Kevin Kern Dr. Richard Feinberg Accepted by Dr. Kevin Adams , Chair, Department of History Dr. James Blank , Dean College of Arts and Sciences Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................................ IV INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER ONE: POLITICKING FOR THE BORDERLAND .............................................................................................. 27 CHAPTER TWO: MAPPING THE OHIO VALLEY: CRESAP, GIST, AND CELERON (1748-1752) ..................... 73 CHAPTER THREE: BUILDING THE EMPIRE: STRUCTURES AND ALLIANCES, 1750-1753 ........................... 128 CHAPTER FOUR: NEGOTIATING FOR THE BORDERLAND: DINWIDDIE, WASHINGTON, AND TRENT .. 173 CHAPTER FIVE: THE OHIO COMPANY: MILITARIZING THE OHIO VALLEY. .................................................... 224 CONCLUSION: CRUMBLING THE COLONIAL COALITION ......................................................................................... 265 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................................................................... 282 APPENDIX A: CHRISTOPHER GIST’S ROUTE 1750 .................................................................................................... 291 APPENDIX B: CHRISTOPHER GIST’S ROUTE 1751 .................................................................................................... 292 APPENDIX C: WASHINGTON AND GIST ROUTE IN 1753 ......................................................................................... 293 APPENDIX D: WASHINGTON IN THE OHIO VALLEY 1754-1759 .......................................................................... 294 APPENDIX E: BRADDOCK’S ROUTE 1755 ..................................................................................................................... 295 APPENDIX F: FATHER BONNECAMPS MAP OF CELERON’S ROUTE ..................................................................... 296 iii Acknowledgements This dissertation and its argument have grown organically over many years, and many individuals have aided and influenced this project. I am indebted to several people, whom I cannot possibly thank enough. My father, Dr. Charles Hager, introduced me to old books on the history of our home, western Maryland, and through these readings on Thomas Cresap, Christopher Gist, and Fort Cumberland, it became evident to me that the Ohio Company drove westward expansion. I wrote my first and second papers on these subjects in 2007 and 2009 at Frostburg State University, and I am especially thankful to those faculty, Dr. David Dean, Dr. John Wisemen, Dr. Alum Abbay, and Dr. Sally Boniece, who fostered my academic development and confidence. I am also indebted to Dr. Tyler Boulware and Dr. Joseph Hodge at West Virginia University for expanding my knowledge of British colonial America and guided me through my Masters’ Thesis. I am immensely grateful for the input of my dissertation committee. Dr. Kevin Kern encouraged my research and let me know that academic history was allowed to be enjoyable. Dr. Richard Feinberg, as an anthropologist, pushed me past my assumptions, and the assumptions of the field, to reveal both problems and insights into my work. Dr. Kevin Adams, as well as providing a comprehensive reading list, questioned my arguments, and pushed my conclusions to the betterment of this dissertation. To my advisor, Dr. Kim Gruenwald, I am enormously indebted. Interested in my subject from the beginning, she fostered my academic creativity and reassured me of the importance of my project. As a mentor, she simultaneously supported and pushed me as I coped with the ups and downs of life outside academia, and for that I thank her more than I can say. iv This dissertation was fostered, financially and logistically by a few key institutions. I am thankful to the Michael Cresap Museum, Jilla Smith, Bob Bantz and, Ranger Rita Knox at the C & O Canal National Historical Park for showing me the local history behind the road signs. I want to thank the staff at the Historical Society of Pennsylvania, and the Swem and Carnegie Libraries at William and Mary for their help. A special thanks to the staff at the University of Pittsburgh archives for their help in navigating the many different collections with similar-sounding names. I could not have finished this dissertation without my family and dear friends. I want to thank Michelle Curran Cornell for being with me each step of the way, her friendship and love means the world to me, and I am richer for having her in my life. Thank you to my mother-in-law, Dr. Terry Kasecamp, who provided childcare and compassion throughout this process. My parents have supported me financially, emotionally, and physically thought out this project. My mother, Pamella Weir Hager, has loved and supported me and my children throughout this entire project, and for her unconditional love and constant understanding, I will be eternally grateful. My father, Dr. Charles T. Hager, provided historical knowledge and interest in my subject and never doubted that I could complete this project. He provided motivation and endless proofreading, and I cannot thank him enough. To Ella and Brice, you were both born alongside the project, and you both bring infinite joy and love into my life. Lastly, I must thank my husband, Brian Kasecamp, Esq. although thanks do not seem enough. He read drafts, went on “vacations” to archives, and gave his support to me and this project in every way. His love and faith in me are humbling, and I am forever thankful that he stood with me through this process. v Introduction “Fathers, Both you and the English are white, we live in a Country between; therefore the Land belongs to neither one nor t’other: But the Great Being above allow’d it to be a place of Residence for us so Fathers, I desire you to withdraw, as I have done our Brothers the English; for I will keep you at Arms length: I lay this down as a Trial for both, to see which will have the greatest Regard to it, and that side we will stand by, and make equal Sharers with us.” -Half-King Tanaghrisson1 This speech made to the French Captain Marin speaks volumes about the situation in the Ohio Country in the mid-1700s. As Tanaghrisson, the Iroquoian Half-King, so eloquently phrased, the “Country between” was highly contested, and no one involved, neither the Iroquois, the French, nor the British, felt inclined to let it go without a fight. Due to the diversity and number of people interested in the Ohio Country, empire-building 1 George Washington, “Journey to the French Commandant: Narrative,” Founders Online, National Archives. Accessed April 11, 2019, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/01-01-02-0003-0002. [Original source: The Diaries of George Washington, vol. 1, 11 March 1748 – 13 November 1765, ed. Donald Jackson. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1976, pp. 130–161.] The Iroquois at Onondaga would appoint a “Half-King” to be their representative for the Ohio Valley peoples living under the “control” of the Iroquois. The Iroquois council intended for the Half-King to speak for local bands, negotiate with outsiders, and accept diplomatic gifts, but the Half-King could not enter into binding treaties without the consent of the Onondaga Council. This was the arrangement the Iroquois wanted, as this dissertation explores in later chapters. The on-the-ground reality was that the Iroquois relationship with the Ohio Indians and Tanaghrisson’s role of Half-King were much more complicated and constantly changing. 1 there was neither monolithic nor consistent; each empire and colony had its own method and reason for pushing into the Ohio River Valley. Although the British government was interested in the region in the late 1740s, colonization efforts remained decentralized until the outbreak of the Seven Years’ War.2 Each British colony acted individually, often in competition with all the others. So, who did Tanaghrisson mean when he says “English” in the above quotation? He may have meant those “English,” or rather British individuals, who had pushed west into the Ohio Valley without permission from the Crown or plan for permanent settlement. Rogue imperialists spread the influence and reach of British trade networks but conducted their work outside the purview of the British government.3 Most traders and trappers ventured into the Ohio Valley without threating to take Native American land or establish permanent settlements. Ohio Indians and Iroquois did