DOCSLIB.ORG

Epidemiology and Biology of Powdery Mildews and Their Host Plants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Epidemiology and Biology of Powdery Mildews and Their Host Plants Epidemiology and biology of powdery mildews and their host plants Michael Bradshaw A dissertation Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2020 Reading Committee: Patrick Tobin, Chair Marianne Elliott Soo-Hyung Kim Caroline Strömberg Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Environmental and Forest Sciences © Copyright 2020 Michael Bradshaw University of Washington Abstract Epidemiology and biology of powdery mildews and their host plants Michael Bradshaw Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Patrick Tobin School of Environmental and Forest Science Powdery mildew is one of the most prevalent plant pathogens in the Pacific Northwest with over 150 different species infecting over 1000 plants. The hot, dry summers and wet, mild winters in this region are optimal for its colonization and spread. Sequencing herbarium specimens for plant pathogens, including powdery mildews, can be challenging but useful in addressing fundamental ecological, epidemiological, and phylogenetic questions in plant-pathogen interactions. In my dissertation, I reviewed the taxonomy and phylogeny of powdery mildews and developed a new sequencing protocol for sequencing herbarium specimens. Using this new sequencing protocol, I conducted a world-wide phylogenetic and taxonomic analysis on powdery mildews on Viburnum, in which I described two new species, E. viburniphila sp. nov and E. pseudoviburni sp. nov, and reduced E. hedwigii to synonymy with E. viburni; and genetically ascertained the origin and timing of an introduced plant pathogen of which Acer macrophyllum (bigleaf maple) is highly susceptible. Additionally, I evaluated 126 plant species within Asteraceae to measure the role of host plant morphological traits and evolutionary history on their suitability and susceptibility to the powdery mildew, Golovinomyces latisporus, and observed that phylogenetic structure, and not plant morphology, is the most consistent predictor of host susceptibility to pathogens. Examining genetic data of ancient herbarium specimens and quantifying host evolutionary history can be useful approaches in deciphering the invasion dynamics and potential impacts of non-native plant pathogens, and addressing ecological, evolutionary and pathological questions related to emerging plant pathogen epidemics. Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 2 CHAPTER 1: SEQUENCING HERBARIUM SPECIMENS OF A COMMON DETRIMENTAL PLANT DISEASE (POWDERY MILDEW). ..................................................................................................................... 6 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 PHYLOGENY ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 SEQUENCING ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 17 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 CHAPTER 2: PHYLOGENY AND TAXONOMY OF POWDERY MILDEW ON VIBURNUM SPECIES . 32 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................. 34 MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................................................................................................................................................ 36 Sample collection. ............................................................................................................................................................................. 36 Morphological examinations. ............................................................................................................................................................ 36 DNA analyses. ............................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Phylogenetic analyses......................................................................................................................................................................... 38 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 40 Phylogenetic analyses......................................................................................................................................................................... 40 TAXONOMY ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 42 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 53 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 CHAPTER 3: A WORLDWIDE ASSESSMENT OF SAWADAEA BICORNIS ON ACER SPP. REVEALS MULTIPLE HAPLOTYPES AND THE ORIGIN OF AN INVASIVE FUNGAL PLANT PATHOGEN ..... 65 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 65 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................. 67 MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................................................................................................................................................ 70 Species Identification ......................................................................................................................................................................... 70 Susceptibility of Acer species to Sawadaea bicornis ............................................................................................................................ 71 Worldwide genetic analysis of powdery mildew on Acer spp. .............................................................................................................. 74 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 77 Species Identification ......................................................................................................................................................................... 77 Susceptibility of Acer species to Sawadaea bicornis ............................................................................................................................ 77 Worldwide genetic analysis of powdery mildew on Acer spp. .............................................................................................................. 79 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 82 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 86 CHAPTER 4: HOST EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY DICTATES SUSCEPTIBILITY TO DISEASE: EVOLUTION OF SUSCEPTIBILITY IN THE ASTERACEAE TO THE POWDERY MILDEW GOLOVINOMYCES LATISPORUS.................................................................................................................. 97 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 97 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................. 98 METHODS .........................................................................................................................................................................................100
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest Coniferous Forest Meadow Province
    Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Regional Guide for Farmers, Land Managers, and Gardeners In the Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest Coniferous Forest Meadow Province Including the states of: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia And parts of: Georgia, Kentucky, and North Carolina, NAPPC South Carolina, Tennessee Table of CONTENTS Why Support Pollinators? 4 Getting Started 5 Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest 6 Meet the Pollinators 8 Plant Traits 10 Developing Plantings 12 Far ms 13 Public Lands 14 Home Landscapes 15 Bloom Periods 16 Plants That Attract Pollinators 18 Habitat Hints 20 This is one of several guides for Check list 22 different regions in the United States. We welcome your feedback to assist us in making the future Resources and Feedback 23 guides useful. Please contact us at [email protected] Cover: silver spotted skipper courtesy www.dangphoto.net 2 Selecting Plants for Pollinators Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Regional Guide for Farmers, Land Managers, and Gardeners In the Ecological Region of the Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest Coniferous Forest Meadow Province Including the states of: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia And parts of: Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee a nappc and Pollinator Partnership™ Publication This guide was funded by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, the C.S. Fund, the Plant Conservation Alliance, the U.S. Forest Service, and the Bureau of Land Management with oversight by the Pollinator Partnership™ (www.pollinator.org), in support of the North American Pollinator Protection Campaign (NAPPC–www.nappc.org). Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest – Coniferous Forest – Meadow Province 3 Why support pollinators? In theIr 1996 book, the Forgotten PollInators, Buchmann and Nabhan estimated that animal pollinators are needed for the reproduction “ Farming feeds of 90% of flowering plants and one third of human food crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Interspecific Relationships Affecting Endangered Species Recognized by O'odham and Comcaac Cultures
    Interspecific Relationships Affecting Endangered Species Recognized by O'Odham and Comcáac Cultures Author(s): Gary Paul Nabhan Source: Ecological Applications, Vol. 10, No. 5 (Oct., 2000), pp. 1288-1295 Published by: Ecological Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2641284 Accessed: 03/11/2010 16:20 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=esa. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecological Applications. http://www.jstor.org 1288 INVITED FEATURE Ecological Applications Vol. 10, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Technical Report for the Nichols Mine Project
    Biological Technical Report for the Nichols Mine Project June 8, 2016 Prepared for: Nichols Road Partners, LLC P.O. Box 77850 Corona, CA 92877 Prepared by: Alden Environmental, Inc. 3245 University Avenue, #1188 San Diego, CA 92104 Nichols Road Mine Project Biological Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Location ..................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Description ..............................................................................................1 2.0 METHODS & SURVEY LIMITATIONS .................................................................1 2.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................1 2.2 Biological Surveys ..............................................................................................2 2.2.1 Vegetation Mapping..................................................................................3 2.2.2 Jurisdictional Delineations of Waters of U.S. and Waters of the State ....4 2.2.3 Sensitive Species Surveys .........................................................................4 2.2.4 Survey Limitations ....................................................................................5 2.2.5 Nomenclature ............................................................................................5 3.0 REGULATORY
    [Show full text]
  • Barcoding the Asteraceae of Tennessee, Tribe Coreopsideae
    Schilling, E.E., N. Mattson, and A. Floden. 2014. Barcoding the Asteraceae of Tennessee, tribe Coreopsideae. Phytoneuron 2014-101: 1–6. Published 20 October 2014. ISSN 2153 733X BARCODING THE ASTERACEAE OF TENNESSEE, TRIBE COREOPSIDEAE EDWARD E. SCHILLING, NICHOLAS MATTSON, AARON FLODEN Herbarium TENN Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT Results from barcoding studies of tribe Coreopsideae for the Tennessee flora using the nuclear ribosomal ITS marker are presented and include the first complete reports for 2 of the 20 species of the tribe that occur in the state, as well as updated reports for several others. Sequence data from the ITS region separate most of the species of Bidens in Tennessee from one another, but species of Coreopsis, especially those of sect. Coreopsis, have ITS sequences that are identical (or nearly so) to at least one congener. Comparisons of sequence data to GenBank records are complicated by apparent inaccuracies of older sequences as well as potentially misidentified samples. Broad survey of C. lanceolata from across its range showed little variability, but the ITS sequence of a morphologically distinct sample from a Florida limestone glade area was distinct in lacking a length polymorphism that was present in other samples. Tribe Coreopsideae is part of the Heliantheae alliance and earlier was often included in an expanded Heliantheae (Anderberg et al. 2007) in which it was usually treated as a subtribe (Crawford et al. 2009). The tribe shows a small burst of diversity in the southeastern USA involving Bidens and Coreopsis sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Science 2018: Resistance to Powdery Mildew (Blumeria Graminis F. Sp. Hordei) in Winter Barley, Poland- Jerzy H Czembor, Al
    Extended Abstract Insights in Aquaculture and Biotechnology 2019 Vol.3 No.1 a Plant Science 2018: Resistance to powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei) in winter barley, Poland- Jerzy H Czembor, Aleksandra Pietrusinska and Kinga Smolinska-Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute – National Research Institute Jerzy H Czembor, Aleksandra Pietrusinska and Kinga Smolinska Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute – National Research Institute, Poland Powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei) is Barley powdery mildew is brought about by Blumeria the most ecomically important barley pathogen. This graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh) is one of the most wind borne fungus causes foliar disease and yield damaging foliar maladies of grain. This growth is the loses rich up to 20-30%. Resistance for powdery main types of the family Blumeria however it has mildew is the aim of numerous breeding programmes. recently been treated as a types of Erysiphe. As per The transfer of the MLO gene for resistance to Braun (1987), it varies from all types of Erysiphe since powdery mildew into winter barley cultivars using its anamorph has special highlights, for instance, Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS) strategy is digitate haustoria, auxiliary mycelium with bristle-like presented. These cultivars are characterized by high hyphae and bulbous swellings of the conidiophores, and stable yield under polish conditions. Field testing and as a result of the structure of the ascocarps. Braun of the obtained lines with MLO resistance for their (1987) thinks about that, in view of these distinctions, agricultural value was conducted. Four cultivars there ought to be a detachment at conventional level.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Basal Resistance of Barley to Adapted and Non-Adapted Forms of Blumeria Graminis
    Basal resistance of barley to adapted and non-adapted forms of Blumeria graminis Reza Aghnoum Thesis committee Thesis supervisors Prof. Dr. Richard G.F. Visser Professor of Plant Breeding Wageningen University Dr.ir. Rients E. Niks Assistant professor, Laboratory of Plant Breeding Wageningen University Other members Prof. Dr. R.F. Hoekstra, Wageningen University Prof. Dr. F. Govers, Wageningen University Prof. Dr. ir. C. Pieterse, Utrecht University Dr.ir. G.H.J. Kema, Plant Research International, Wageningen This research was conducted under the auspices of the Graduate school of Experimental Plant Sciences. II Basal resistance of barley to adapted and non-adapted forms of Blumeria graminis Reza Aghnoum Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. Dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Doctorate Board to be defended in public on Tuesday 16 June 2009 at 4 PM in the Aula. III Reza Aghnoum Basal resistance of barley to adapted and non-adapted forms of Blumeria graminis 132 pages. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2009) With references, with summaries in Dutch and English ISBN 978-90-8585-419-7 IV Contents Chapter 1 1 General introduction Chapter 2 15 Which candidate genes are responsible for natural variation in basal resistance of barley to barley powdery mildew? Chapter 3 47 Transgressive segregation for extreme low and high level of basal resistance to powdery mildew in barley
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad Y Distribución De La Familia Asteraceae En México
    Taxonomía y florística Diversidad y distribución de la familia Asteraceae en México JOSÉ LUIS VILLASEÑOR Botanical Sciences 96 (2): 332-358, 2018 Resumen Antecedentes: La familia Asteraceae (o Compositae) en México ha llamado la atención de prominentes DOI: 10.17129/botsci.1872 botánicos en las últimas décadas, por lo que cuenta con una larga tradición de investigación de su riqueza Received: florística. Se cuenta, por lo tanto, con un gran acervo bibliográfico que permite hacer una síntesis y actua- October 2nd, 2017 lización de su conocimiento florístico a nivel nacional. Accepted: Pregunta: ¿Cuál es la riqueza actualmente conocida de Asteraceae en México? ¿Cómo se distribuye a lo February 18th, 2018 largo del territorio nacional? ¿Qué géneros o regiones requieren de estudios más detallados para mejorar Associated Editor: el conocimiento de la familia en el país? Guillermo Ibarra-Manríquez Área de estudio: México. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una exhaustiva revisión de literatura florística y taxonómica, así como la revi- sión de unos 200,000 ejemplares de herbario, depositados en más de 20 herbarios, tanto nacionales como del extranjero. Resultados: México registra 26 tribus, 417 géneros y 3,113 especies de Asteraceae, de las cuales 3,050 son especies nativas y 1,988 (63.9 %) son endémicas del territorio nacional. Los géneros más relevantes, tanto por el número de especies como por su componente endémico, son Ageratina (164 y 135, respecti- vamente), Verbesina (164, 138) y Stevia (116, 95). Los estados con mayor número de especies son Oaxa- ca (1,040), Jalisco (956), Durango (909), Guerrero (855) y Michoacán (837). Los biomas con la mayor riqueza de géneros y especies son el bosque templado (1,906) y el matorral xerófilo (1,254).
    [Show full text]
  • IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Plan of Development, Appendix D.2
    APPENDIX D.2 Plant Survey Memorandum Athos Memo Report To: Aspen Environmental Group From: Lehong Chow, Ironwood Consulting, Inc. Date: April 3, 2019 Re: Athos Supplemental Spring 2019 Botanical Surveys This memo report presents the methods and results for supplemental botanical surveys conducted for the Athos Solar Energy Project in March 2019 and supplements the Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR; Ironwood 2019) which reported on field surveys conducted in 2018. BACKGROUND Botanical surveys were previously conducted in the spring and fall of 2018 for the entirety of the project site for the Athos Solar Energy Project (Athos). However, due to insufficient rain, many plant species did not germinate for proper identification during 2018 spring surveys. Fall surveys in 2018 were conducted only on a reconnaissance-level due to low levels of rain. Regional winter rainfall from the two nearest weather stations showed rainfall averaging at 0.1 inches during botanical surveys conducted in 2018 (Ironwood, 2019). In addition, gen-tie alignments have changed slightly and alternatives, access roads and spur roads have been added. PURPOSE The purpose of this survey was to survey all new additions and re-survey areas of interest including public lands (limited to portions of the gen-tie segments), parcels supporting native vegetation and habitat, and windblown sandy areas where sensitive plant species may occur. The private land parcels in current or former agricultural use were not surveyed (parcel groups A, B, C, E, and part of G). METHODS Survey Areas: The area surveyed for biological resources included the entirety of gen-tie routes (including alternates), spur roads, access roads on public land, parcels supporting native vegetation (parcel groups D and F), and areas covered by windblown sand where sensitive species may occur (portion of parcel group G).
    [Show full text]