DOCSLIB.ORG

Ericaceae Key & Charts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ericaceae (Heath or Blueberry Family) Key Key to species in Newfoundland and Labrador © Flora of Newfoundland and Labrador (2019) 1a. Plants herbaceous, with basal leaves; or plants mycotrophic, leaves lacking; scales and stems non-photosynthetic. .................................................................................................. 2 1b. Plants with woody or barely woody stems; leaves photosynthetic, deciduous or evergreen, leaf arrangement opposite, alternate, or whorled. ......................................... 12 2a. Plants mycotrophic, leaves and stems lacking chlorophyll; leaves reduced and scale- like, lacking venation. .................................................................................................. 3 2b. Plants herbaceous, with basal leaves; leaves deciduous or evergreen. ..................... 4 3a. Plants white, with a solitary nodding flower; sepals 2–4, white, scale-like; petals 5, white; stamens 8–14; pistil solitary, the stigma surrounded by a dark brown ring. ......................... ........................................................................................... Monotropa uniflora (ghost pipe) 3b. Plants yellow to yellow-orange, with a nodding raceme of several flowers; sepals 4–5, petals 4–5, stamens 8–10; pistil solitary, the stigma subtended by a ciliate ring of short hairs. ................................................................................... Hypopitys monotropa (pinesap) 4a. Plants with 2–5 whorls of oblanceolate, evergreen leaves; flowers 3–7, in a terminal umbel; petals 5, rose-pink to white, calyx 5-lobed; stamens 10, filaments broad at the base, abruptly narrowed below the deep pink anthers, dehiscing through short terminal pores; the solitary pistil topped by a broad sessile stigma, 2.4–4 mm wide. ............................................................................... Chimaphila umbellata (pipsissewa) 4b. Plants with basal leaves only, flowers solitary or in racemes. .................................... 5 5a. Plants with a solitary flower; petals ovate to broadly ovate, 8–12 mm long; stamens 10, the anthers bending backward towards the base of the filaments, dehiscing through pores at the end of 2 short basal tubules, facing away from the centre of the flower; pistil solitary, style 1, stigma with 5 short lobes; leaves with serrate margins. ............................. ............................................................................ Moneses uniflora (oneflower wintergreen) 5b. Plants with several flowers arranged in an erect raceme; calyx 5-lobed, petals 5, stamens 10, pistil 1; leaves with entire, obscurely crenate, or serrate margins. ............................... 6 6a. Leaf blades ovate, with serrate margins; raceme one-sided. ...................................... .................................................................... Orthilia secunda (one-sided wintergreen) 6b. Leaves blade ovate, oblong, or nearly orbicular, margins entire to obscurely crenate; racemes with flowers spirally arranged, not one-sided (Pyrola). ............................... 7 7a. Stigma short and straight, not exceeding the corolla ................ Pyrola minor (lesser pyrola) 7b. Stigma S-shaped (declined, upward curved at apex), 4–10 mm long, exceeding the corolla. ............................................................................................................................................... 8 8a. Leaf blades often with whitish or light green lines above the major veins; leaf blade shorter than the petiole; petals greenish-white. Pyrola chlorantha (greenish pyrola) 8b. Leaves solid green, leaf blade longer than or about equal to the petiole; corolla white or pink. .............................................................................................................. 9 9a. Leaf blades elliptic to oblong; membranaceous, upper surface dull; leaf blade longer than the petiole; petals creamy white. ................................................. Pyrola elliptica (shinleaf) 9b. Leaf blades ovate, orbicular, to reniform; coriaceous, upper surface glossy; leaf blade and petiole about equal in length; petals deep to pale pink, or white-tinged with pink. ....... 10 10a. Leaf blades 1–4 cm long; flowers relatively large, petals creamy white to crimson, 6– 10 mm long; calyx lobes 5–7-nerved; anthers 1.7–2.3 mm long, stigma 3–6 mm long. .................................................................................. Pyrola grandiflora (arctic pyrola) 10b. Leaf blade 1.8–8 cm long; petals pink or white, 5–8 mm long; calyx lobe nerveless or 3–5-nerved; anthers 2–3.6 mm long; stigma 5–11 mm long. ................................. 11 11a. Petals deep to pale pink; calyx lobes thin, lanceolate-triangular, 1.8–3 mm long, tips acute-acuminate. ..................................................................... Pyrola asarifolia (pink pyrola) 11b. Petals creamy- to milky white; calyx-lobes firm, oblong-lanceolate, 1.6–3+ mm long, tips acute to obtuse. ........................................................... Pyrola americana (roundleaf pyrola) 12a. Plants with creeping, trailing, or matted stems; stems barely to slightly woody; leaves opposite or alternate, sometimes appearing whorled. ................................. 13 12b. Plants erect, with woody stems. ............................................................................... 33 13a. Plants with slender trailing or creeping stems, to 1+ m long, with ascending branches to 20 cm tall; corolla 4-lobed; stamens 8; leaves to 1.7 cm long by up to 0.5 cm wide, blades small, elliptic, ± triangular, ovate, or nearly orbicular. ..................................................... 14 13b. Plants with prostrate, multi-branched stems, forming mats or colonies to 60 cm tall; corolla 4- or 5-lobed; stamens 10; leaves to 8 cm long by up to 1.5 cm wide; blades small and linear to large and oval. ............................................................................................... 17 14a. Stems slender, densely covered with stiff (strigose) reddish-brown hairs; flowers with a white campanulate corolla, stamens less than 1 mm long, the flat elliptic filaments shorter than the anthers; fruit white, ovoid, berry-like, 2.5–6 mm long. ................................................................... Gaultheria hispidula (creeping snowberry) 14b. Stems very slender to thread-like, glabrous to minutely hairy; flowers with a deeply 4-lobed corolla, whitish-pink to pink, strongly reflexed; stamens obviously exserted; fruit a light to dark red globose berry, 5–15 mm diam. (Vaccinium, in part). .......... 15 15a. Flowers and fruits axillary, pedicels arising from the base of the current year's growth; leaves 5–18 mm long, elliptic to oval, with rounded apices. ................................................. ............................................................................ Vaccinium macrocarpon (large cranberry) 15b. Flowers and fruit terminal, pedicel arising from the tip of the current year's growth; leaves 2–10 mm long, ovate to narrowly triangular, with acute apices. .......................... 16 16a. Pedicels minutely pubescent; corolla lobes 5.5–6 mm long, stamens more than 4 mm long, anthers 1.5–1.8 mm long. ............... Vaccinium oxycoccos (small cranberry) 16b. Pedicels glabrous or nearly so; corolla lobes less than 5.5 mm long, stamens less than 4 mm long, anthers 0.7–1.1 mm long. .................................................................. ............................................................ Vaccinium microcarpum (small bog cranberry) 17a. Plants with alternate leaves, blades elliptic, oblanceolate, oval, obovate, or nearly orbicular............................................................................................................................... 18 17b. Plants with opposite leaves, blades lanceolate to ovate, often small, scale-like, and overlapping, blades to 6 mm long by up to 1.5 mm wide; or leaves alternate and densely spirally along the stem, appearing whorled, blades slender, subulate, linear, or linear- oblong, blades to 10 mm long by up to 1.3 mm wide ........................................................ 26 18a. Leaves evergreen. ...................................................................................................... 19 18b. Leaves deciduous. ...................................................................................................... 23 19a. Leaf surfaces hairy or scurfy, covered with golden resinous glands and/or rusty-coloured peltate scales. ..................................................................................................................... 20 19b. Leaf surfaces glabrous, shiny to glossy. .............................................................................. 22 20a. Upper leaf surfaces dull, stems and lower leaf surfaces scurfy; leaf surfaces and stems also bearing aromatic resin dots; corolla purple. ............................................... ............................................................. Rhododendron lapponicum (Lapland rosebay) 20b. Upper leaf surfaces shiny or dull, with dense to scattered hairs; aromatic resin dots lacking; corolla white to pink-tinged. ........................................................................ 21 21a. Stems with above-ground creeping woody stems, leaves ovate to oval, 3–8 cm long, leaf surfaces and stems hairy; flowers fragrant, few in terminal cluster; corolla white-hairy along the tube and throat of the
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
  • Rare Vascular Plant Surveys in the Polletts Cove and Lahave River Areas of Nova Scotia

    Rare Vascular Plant Surveys in the Polletts Cove and Lahave River Areas of Nova Scotia

    Rare Vascular Plant Surveys in the Polletts Cove and LaHave River areas of Nova Scotia David Mazerolle, Sean Blaney and Alain Belliveau Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre November 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was funded by the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, through their Species at Risk Conservation Fund. The Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre appreciates the opportunity provided by the fund to have visited these botanically significant areas. We also thank Sean Basquill for mapping, fieldwork and good company on our Polletts Cove trip, and Cape Breton Highlands National Park for assistance with vehicle transportation at the start of that trip. PHOTOGRAPHY CREDITS All photographs included in this report were taken by the authors. 1 INTRODUCTION This project, funded by the Nova Scotia Species at Risk Conservation Fund, focused on two areas of high potential for rare plant occurrence: 1) the Polletts Cove and Blair River system in northern Cape Breton, covered over eight AC CDC botanist field days; and 2) the lower, non-tidal 29 km and selected tidal portions of the LaHave River in Lunenburg County, covered over 12 AC CDC botanist field days. The Cape Breton Highlands support a diverse array of provincially rare plants, many with Arctic or western affinity, on cliffs, river shores, and mature deciduous forests in the deep ravines (especially those with more calcareous bedrock and/or soil) and on the peatlands and barrens of the highland plateau. Recent AC CDC fieldwork on Lockhart Brook, Big Southwest Brook and the North Aspy River sites similar to the Polletts Cove and Blair River valley was very successful, documenting 477 records of 52 provincially rare plant species in only five days of fieldwork.
  • Plant Communities Within Atlantic Coastal Heathlands in Nova Scotia

    Plant Communities Within Atlantic Coastal Heathlands in Nova Scotia

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269580394 Plant Communities within Atlantic Coastal Heathlands in Nova Scotia Article in Northeastern Naturalist · December 2013 DOI: 10.1656/045.020.0420 CITATION READS 1 183 2 authors: Robert Cameron Soren Bondrup-Nielsen Nova Scotia Department of Environment, Canada, Halifax Acadia University 52 PUBLICATIONS 398 CITATIONS 32 PUBLICATIONS 544 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Population status and habitat of Fuscopannaria leucosticta in Canada View project mercury in lichens View project All content following this page was uploaded by Robert Cameron on 01 March 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. 2013 NORTHEASTERNNortheastern NaturalistNATURALIST 20(4):694–709Vol. 20, No. 4 R.P. Cameron and S. Bondrup-Nielsen Plant Communities within Atlantic Coastal Heathlands in Nova Scotia Robert P. Cameron1,* and Soren Bondrup-Nielsen2 Abstract - Coastal heathlands are rare ecosystems that provide habitat for rare species in Nova Scotia. Thirty-nine plots were established in Nova Scotia heathlands to assess plant community composition and occurrence of rare plants. Analysis of species richness and multidimensional scaling (MDS) revealed that heathland communities are varied, with differences between regions, inland and coastal sites, and between physiognomy types. Six rare plants occurred within 9 of 39 plots. Coastal heathland communities were found to have greater species richness and variation in community type than previously thought. Heathland rare plants are not restricted to any particular community type; rather, rare coastal plants in Nova Scotia occur in a wide variety of community types.
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24

    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24

    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
  • Ericaceae Root Associated Fungi Revealed by Culturing and Culture – Independent Molecular Methods

    Ericaceae Root Associated Fungi Revealed by Culturing and Culture – Independent Molecular Methods

    a Ericaceae root associated fungi revealed by culturing and culture – independent molecular methods. by Damian S. Bougoure BSc (Hons) Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Horticulture and Plant Sciences University of Western Sydney February 2006 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Although I am credited with writing this thesis there is a multitude of people that have contributed to its completion in ways other than hitting the letters on a keyboard and I would like to thank them here. Firstly I’d like to thank my supervisor, Professor John Cairney, whose knowledge and guidance was invaluable in steering me along the PhD path. The timing of John’s ‘motivational chats’ was uncanny and his patience particularly, during the writing stage, seemed limitless at times. I’d also like to thank the Australian government for granting me an Australian Postgraduate Award (APA) scholarship, Paul Worden from Macquarie University and the staff from the Millennium Institute at Westmead Hospital for performing DNA sequencing and the National Parks and Wildlife Service of New South Wales and Environmental Protection agency of Queensland for permission to collect the Ericaceae plants. Thankyou to Mary Gandini from James Cook University for showing me the path to a Rhododendron lochiae population through the thick North Queenland rainforest. Without her help and I’d still be pointing the GPS at the sky. Thankyou to the other people in the lab studying mycorrhizas including Catherine Hitchcock, Susan Chambers, Adrienne Williams and particularly Brigitte Bastias with whom I shared an office. Everyone mentioned was generally just as willing as I was to talk about matters other than mycorrhizas.
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2

    Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2

    Appendix F Species List Appendix F: Species List F. Species List F.1 Lists The following list and three tables denote the bird, mammal, fish, and plant species known to occur in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Arctic Refuge, Refuge). F.1.1 Birds of Arctic Refuge A total of 201 bird species have been recorded on Arctic Refuge. This list describes their status and abundance. Many birds migrate outside of the Refuge in the winter, so unless otherwise noted, the information is for spring, summer, or fall. Bird names and taxonomic classification follow American Ornithologists' Union (1998). F.1.1.1 Definitions of classifications used Regions of the Refuge . Coastal Plain – The area between the coast and the Brooks Range. This area is sometimes split into coastal areas (lagoons, barrier islands, and Beaufort Sea) and inland areas (uplands near the foothills of the Brooks Range). Brooks Range – The mountains, valleys, and foothills north and south of the Continental Divide. South Side – The foothills, taiga, and boreal forest south of the Brooks Range. Status . Permanent Resident – Present throughout the year and breeds in the area. Summer Resident – Only present from May to September. Migrant – Travels through on the way to wintering or breeding areas. Breeder – Documented as a breeding species. Visitor – Present as a non-breeding species. * – Not documented. Abundance . Abundant – Very numerous in suitable habitats. Common – Very likely to be seen or heard in suitable habitats. Fairly Common – Numerous but not always present in suitable habitats. Uncommon – Occurs regularly but not always observed because of lower abundance or secretive behaviors.
  • New York Natural Heritage Program Rare Plant Status List May 2004 Edited By

    New York Natural Heritage Program Rare Plant Status List May 2004 Edited By

    New York Natural Heritage Program Rare Plant Status List May 2004 Edited by: Stephen M. Young and Troy W. Weldy This list is also published at the website: www.nynhp.org For more information, suggestions or comments about this list, please contact: Stephen M. Young, Program Botanist New York Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway, 5th Floor Albany, NY 12233-4757 518-402-8951 Fax 518-402-8925 E-mail: [email protected] To report sightings of rare species, contact our office or fill out and mail us the Natural Heritage reporting form provided at the end of this publication. The New York Natural Heritage Program is a partnership with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and by The Nature Conservancy. Major support comes from the NYS Biodiversity Research Institute, the Environmental Protection Fund, and Return a Gift to Wildlife. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... Page ii Why is the list published? What does the list contain? How is the information compiled? How does the list change? Why are plants rare? Why protect rare plants? Explanation of categories.................................................................................................................... Page iv Explanation of Heritage ranks and codes............................................................................................ Page iv Global rank State rank Taxon rank Double ranks Explanation of plant
  • Botanical and Ecological Inventory of Peatland Sites on the Medicine Bow National Forest

    Botanical and Ecological Inventory of Peatland Sites on the Medicine Bow National Forest

    Botanical and Ecological Inventory of Peatland Sites on the Medicine Bow National Forest Prepared for Medicine Bow National Forest By Bonnie Heidel and Scott Laursen Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming P.O. Box 3381 Laramie, WY 82071 FS Agreement No. 02-CS-11021400-012 June 2003 ABSTRACT Peatlands are specialized wetland habitats that harbor high concentrations of Wyoming plant species of special concern. Intensive botanical and ecological inventories were conducted at five select peatland sites on Medicine Bow National Forest to further document the vascular flora, update information on plant species of special concern, initiate documentation of the bryophyte flora composition, and to document the vegetation associations. This provides a preliminary summary of peatland botanical and ecological resources on Medicine Bow National Forest, data for comparison between sites, and both floristic and vegetation plot datasets for comparison between Medicine Bow National Forest and Shoshone National Forest where parallel studies were undertaken. It might be used for more more extensive systematic inventories of peatlands and their associated botanical and ecological attributes across the Forest, or related efforts to evaluate watershed, wildlife, and other values associated with peatlands. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS John Proctor (USFS Medicine Bow NF) contributed to fieldwork and provided Forest Service coordination that made this project a reality. Judy Harpel (USFS) made the moss species identifications for a segment of moss specimens, and provided encouragement in bryophyte research. George Jones (WYNDD) and Kathy Roche (USFS Medicine Bow NF) provided literature and comments on site selection and study aspects. Gary Beauvais provided administrative support. Chris Hiemstra and Mark Lyford (UW) provided study site data.
  • Presentation

    Presentation

    The Ecology and Conservation of California's Maritime Chaparral Evolution and distribution of Archtostaphylos Tom Parker Maritime Chaparral No real definition has stabilized for maritime chaparral. There is Understanding Maritime a continuum of chaparral types distributed along the Chaparral Post-fire at Ft.Ord coast of California. Using Arctostaphylos as the road to and from confusion Summer fog is the one characteristic that links these chaparral types together. Pfeiffer Rock ? Origin within the Ericaceae • The Arbutoideae is a subfamily of the Ericaceae, a widespread and diverse family. The family itself dates beyond 100 MYBP, The recent Arctostaphylos (manzanitas) radiation in and some estimates California has resulted in a confusing group for most place it older. people. As a principal dominant of maritime chaparral, one question is where did all these manzanitas come from? One theory proposed relationships within the family based upon their fungal root mutualists, or mycorrhizae. Using Suggesting single origins for the various mycorrhizal molecular types within the family, the Arbutoideae comes out as sequence one of the oldest lineages. data, these relationships within the Ericaceae were confirmed. Elkhorn Slough Coastal Training Program Workshop January 17, 2003 1 The Ecology and Conservation of California's Maritime Chaparral Evolution and distribution of Archtostaphylos Tom Parker The subfamily Arbutoideae contains 6 What are the relationships among the genera within the Arbutoideae? genera. These genera are found in the northern hemisphere, with most species confined to North America. • Arbutus ~12 species • Arctostaphylos ~60-90 species • Arctous 2 species • Comarostaphylis ~16 species • Ornithostaphylos 1 species • Xylococcus 1 species Molecular sequences suggest Arbutus as the basal genus for the subfamily, and Arbutus Arctostaphylos as the most derived.
  • Common Plants on the North Slope | the North Slope Borough

    Common Plants on the North Slope | the North Slope Borough

    8/17/2020 Common Plants on the North Slope | The North Slope Borough CALENDAR CONTACT Harry K. Brower Jr. , Mayor COMMON PLANTS ON THE NORTH SLOPE Home » Departments » Wildlife Management » Other Topics of Interest » Common Plants on the North Slope Plants are an important subsistence resource for residents across the North Slope. This page provides information on some of the common plants found on the North Slope of Alaska, including plants not used for subsistence. Plant names (common, scientific and Iñupiaq) are provided as well as descriptions, pictures and traditional uses. The resources used for identification are listed here as well as other resources for information on plants. List of Common Plants and others of the North Slope PDF Version Photo Identification of these Common Plants Unknowns - Got any ideas? Please send them to us! Plant Identification and Other Resources Thes pages are a work in progress. If you see any misinformation, misidentifications, or have pictures to add, please contact us. Information on the Iñupiaq names and traditional uses of these plants is especially welcomed. Check out "Unknown" pictures at bottom of page. Thanks! DISCLAIMER: This guide includes traditional uses of plants and other vegetation. The information is not intended to replace the advice of a physician or be used as a guide for self- medication. Neither the author nor the North Slope Borough claims that information in this guide will cure any illness. Just as prescription medicines can have different effects on www.north-slope.org/departments/wildlife-management/other-topics/common-plants-north-slope 1/3 8/17/2020 Common Plants on the North Slope | The North Slope Borough individuals, so too can plants.
  • Low Arctic Tundra

    Low Arctic Tundra

    ECOREGION Forest Barren Tundra Bog L1 Low Arctic Tundra NF 1 he Low Arctic This is also the driest region in Labrador; TTundra ecoregion the average annual precipitation is only 500 mm, 2 is located at the very which occurs mainly in the form of snow. Not n o r t h e r n t i p o f surprisingly, human habitation in this ecoregion Labrador. It extends south from Cape Chidley to is limited and non-permanent. 3 the Eclipse River, and is bordered by Quebec on In most years, coastal ice continues well the west and the Labrador Sea on the east. This into summer (sometimes not breaking up until region is characterized by a severe, stark beauty: August), which is longer than anywhere else on 4 vast stretches of exposed bedrock, boulders, the Labrador coast. Permafrost is continuous in and bare soil are broken only by patches of the valleys and mountains inland, and moss and lichens. There are no trees or discontinuous in coastal areas. 5 tall shrubs here and other vegetation is The large amount of exposed soil and extremely limited. bedrock, combined with the harsh climate, 6 The topography of the Low Arctic results in sparse vegetation throughout the Tundra includes flat coastal plains in the entire ecoregion. Seasonal flooding also north near Ungava Bay, and low steep- restricts the distribution of plants on valley 7 sided hills in the south with elevation up to floors. Because this area has no forests, 630 metres above sea level. In hilly it is true tundra.
  • Vascular Flora and Geoecology of Mont De La Table, Gaspésie, Québec

    Vascular Flora and Geoecology of Mont De La Table, Gaspésie, Québec

    RHODORA, Vol. 117, No. 969, pp. 1–40, 2015 E Copyright 2015 by the New England Botanical Club doi: 10.3119/14-07; first published on-line March 11, 2015. VASCULAR FLORA AND GEOECOLOGY OF MONT DE LA TABLE, GASPE´ SIE, QUE´ BEC SCOTT W. BAILEY USDA Forest Service, 234 Mirror Lake Road, North Woodstock, NH 03262 e-mail: [email protected] JOANN HOY 21 Steam Mill Road, Auburn, NH 03032 CHARLES V. COGBILL 82 Walker Lane, Plainfield, VT 05667 ABSTRACT. The influence of substrate lithology on the distribution of many vascular and nonvascular plants has long been recognized, especially in alpine, subalpine, and other rocky habitats. In particular, plants have been classified as dependent on high-calcium substrates (i.e., calcicoles) based on common restriction to habitats developed in calcareous rocks, such as limestone and marble. In a classic 1907 paper on the influence of substrate on plants, M. L. Fernald singled out a particular meadow on Mont de la Table in the Chic-Choc Mountains of Que´bec for its unusual co-occurrence of strict calcicole and calcifuge (i.e., acidophile) plant taxa. We re-located this site, investigated substrate factors responsible for its unusual plant diversity, and documented current plant distributions. No calcareous rocks were found on site. However, inclusions of calcareous rocks were found farther up the mountain. The highest pH and dissolved calcium concentrations in surface waters were found in a series of springs that deliver groundwater, presumably influenced by calcareous rocks up the slope. Within the habitat delineated by common occurrences of calcicole species, available soil calcium varied by a factor of five and soil pH varied by almost 1.5 units, depending on microtopography and relative connection with groundwater.