DOCSLIB.ORG

Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party Able to Maintain Power in Germany in the Period 1933 to 1939?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party Able to Maintain Power in Germany in the Period 1933 to 1939? In what ways were Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party able to maintain power in Germany in the period 1933 to 1939? Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party were able to maintain their formidable power in Germany from the period 1933 to 1939. Indeed, the magnitude of the task is seemingly unfathomable as the malevolent paradigm shift in Germany could have been potentially disastrous. However, Hitler and the Nazi Party averted this foreboding predicament through the ruthless implementation of various ways to consolidate power. Ultimately, to delve further into the aforesaid, one must consider the maintenance of power through: the terror and exclusion in 1933, the legal premise that obscured injustices in Gleichschaltung, Volkgemeinschaft & Herrenvolk, and the extensive indoctrination via propaganda and censorship. Firstly, it is imperative to address how Hitler and the Nazis were able to maintain their formidable power through the initial wave of terror and exclusion in 1933. Indeed, the foreboding presence of failure within the 1930s was a certain possibility. Thus, in order to minimise this predicament, Hitler exploited any forms of trepidation amidst the general populous in order to achieve beneficiary outcomes. Unfortunately, it is a known fact that people are more likely to act irrationally in a state of fear and ultimately, this is what Hitler and the Nazi Party substantially relied on in order to make progress within the Reichstag. Ironically, it was the event most catastrophic to the Reichstag that enabled the Nazi Regime to prosper through the aforementioned. The Reichstag fire of February 1933 manifested an unprecedented level of anti-communism hysteria as the prime suspect of the crime was Dutch communist Marinus van der Lubbe. Furthermore, by substantiating Hitler’s views on communism, discrimination through the emergency decree fostered and unfortunately exacerbated Hitler’s and the Nazi Party’s sphere of influence. Thus, this legal facade enabled the annihilation of the Communist election campaign as destruction brought upon by Stormtroopers saw over 4000 Communists arrested. Undoubtedly, this display of brutality in public would coerce Germans to vote for the Nazis in the March elections. Ultimately, giving the Nazi Party satisfactory results with 288 seats and with the additional 52 seats from the Nationalist Party, Hitler gained absolute power. Therefore, through an atmosphere of terrorism and exclusion, Hitler and the Nazi Party consequently established themselves as a formidable force in Nazi Germany’s infancy and thus contributed to their maintenance of power. The second way in which Hitler and the Nazi Party were able to maintain power in Germany in the six-year period was through a legal premise that obscured injustices. As known, Hitler made the transition from a legal chancellor to a legal dictator from 1933 – 34. By choosing to come to power and maintain power constitutionally, it essentially gave Hitler and his Nazi Party utmost credibility despite their acts being excessively unreasonable. Additionally, forms of opposition had hardly any effect on the Nazi Party as the law substantiated their existence and draconian actions. Furthermore, through cementing themselves as the formidable force from their inception under the chancellorship of Hitler, critical events of bringing society into line through Gleichschaltung, reconstructing society through Volkgemeinschaft and fulfilling racial policies through Herrenvolk were made possible. Consequently, strengthening their already powerful supremacy it seems as if nothing could possibly undermine them. Firstly, the process of Gleichschaltung, or the ‘enforced coordination of all levels and interest groups in society’ or simply put, ‘bringing into line’ was solely due to solely due to the Enabling Act of 1933. Brought ‘into line’ were states, trade unions and political parties systematically with apparent ease as the relentlessly annihilation through terror and exclusion continued. Exemplifying his resilience and supremacy, Hitler’s pursuit of Gleichschaltung was unwavering as by 31 March 1933, the eighteen state parliaments had its system altered as it was completely reorganised with the majority of seats belonging to the Nazis. Moreover, Trade Unions also suffered the full extent of Gleichschaltung on 2 May as they were effectively merged in a ‘German Labour Front’ that was directed by a Nazi. Lastly, parties such as the Social Democrats and the Communists were consequently annihilated and by July only the Nazi Party existed. Ultimately, on the first anniversary of Hitler’s accession to power, all eighteen state parliaments were formally eradicated under the passing of the Law for the Reconstruction of the Reich. Evidently, the legal facade in the practice of Gleichschaltung greatly contributed to Hitler and the Nazi Party in maintaining their power. Secondly, the concept of Volkgemeinschaft under the constitutional foundation also aided Hitler and the Nazis in maintaining power. Volkgemeinschaft was the social revolution that morphed the German society. The ultimate social paradigm transition that preached the concept of the People’s Community was successfully implemented in the 1930s. Indeed changing the mentality of the Germany society, by entrenching the ideas of ‘a new society, a harmonious national community, free from class divisions and social conflict’ to the masses. Undoubtedly, after years of despair prior and post-Stresemann era, this national revival would appeal to millions. British historian Alan Bullock epitomises Hitler as a man who resonated with the vast majority of Germans in the following statement, ‘his appeal cut across class and religious boundaries, affecting both young and old, men and women’. Therefore, with such appealing attributes it’s suffices to state that Hitler was capable of achieving Volkgemeinschaft in a short period of time. Furthermore, the extent of this overhaul is only heightened by the fact that women and youth did not show signs of hesitation in the seemingly beneficial alteration. Women for instance had experienced a plethora of rights and high positions in society post-WWI yet were not reluctant in becoming subordinate to men in the 1930s. Excluded from political life and the workforce and confined to the kitchen, rather literally as the motto states ‘Children, Church and Kitchen’, women took on the former traditional role as wives and mothers. Moreover, from 1933 – 35, over 800, 000 women left the workforce and by from 1933 – 39 birth rates increased dramatically from 14.7 births per thousand to 20.4 births per thousand. Of course, this was also encouraged under another legal premise as laws were enacted along with financial incentives to encourage the rise in birth rates. Additionally, youth also experienced the supposed benefits of Volkgemeinschaft as the education and the Hitler Youth left an indelible imprint on young minds. By establishing Hitler Youth, Hitler aimed to use indoctrination as they were fundamentally the foundation of Hitler’s absolute power in the long-term. Thus, as the next generation would continue the national socialist revolution there was an immense focus on the implementation of Nazi Party’s ideology in children of Germany rather than adults as the Hitler Youth was open to manipulation. Therefore, Volkgemeinschaft was effective in the facets of women and youth’s lives as their roles were crucial to Hitler and the Nazi Party consolidating their power. Thirdly, the practice of Herrenvolk through the legal facade of racial policies also substantially assisted Hitler and the Nazi Party’s maintaining of power in the late 1930s. The enactment of racial policies exemplifies the extreme lengths Hitler and the Nazis will go to in order to fulfil their aim in making the Aryan race free from abnormalities and illnesses whilst segregating and later exterminating ‘inferior’ races. Hence, these elements are otherwise known as eugenics and racial segregation. Additionally, by instilling racial policies and thus racism and discrimination into average Germans, their power would undeniably be strengthened to another degree as that hatred of a certain race or quality can no doubt unite people despite differing views on other aspects of life. The focus on anti-Semitism was indeed immense, as from 1933-37, there were more than 13 laws in place that discriminated against the Jews. Indeed the number sounds minute yet these laws were quite effective as from 1933-39, over 50,000 Jews left Germany. The most notable law that impacted Jews was the Nuremburg Law, ‘The Law for the Protection of German blood and German honour’. This law consisted of; forbidden marriages between Jews and Germans, extramarital intercourse between aforementioned forbidden, Germans under 45 could not be employed as domestic servants by Jews and Jews were forbidden to fly Reich or National flag. Hence, through the united detestation of Germany, Hitler and the Nazi Party became an increasingly formidable power. Another way in which Hitler and the Nazis were able to maintain their unparalleled power was through the extensive use of propaganda and censorship. Propaganda had several purposes; to portray Hitler as the Fuhrer, spread Nazi beliefs of the Aryan supremacy, to exemplify the Jewish menace and communist danger and to show the positivity surrounding military and territorial expansion. Furthermore, propaganda was also pivotal to the consolidation of Hitler and the Nazi Party’s power as the practice of indoctrination had to become prevalent in Germany to obscure the myriad of injustices in society. Thus, to deal with such an immense task, the Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda was established in March 1933. Led by Joseph Goebbels, it is plausible to state that without propaganda, Hitler and the Nazi Party would not have existed until 1939. Propaganda works by spreading or encouraging a particular idea or ideas that are based on a collection of lies, although the most effective forms of propaganda relies on a seed of truth that is exaggerated or distorted. Hitler in Mein Kampf declared, 'the bigger the lie, the more inclined people will be to believe it' and indeed there is truth to that statement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5. Between Gleichschaltung and Revolution
    Chapter 5 BETWEEN GLEICHSCHALTUNG AND REVOLUTION In the summer of 1935, as part of the Germany-wide “Reich Athletic Com- petition,” citizens in the state of Schleswig-Holstein witnessed the following spectacle: On the fi rst Sunday of August propaganda performances and maneuvers took place in a number of cities. Th ey are supposed to reawaken the old mood of the “time of struggle.” In Kiel, SA men drove through the streets in trucks bearing … inscriptions against the Jews … and the Reaction. One [truck] carried a straw puppet hanging on a gallows, accompanied by a placard with the motto: “Th e gallows for Jews and the Reaction, wherever you hide we’ll soon fi nd you.”607 Other trucks bore slogans such as “Whether black or red, death to all enemies,” and “We are fi ghting against Jewry and Rome.”608 Bizarre tableau were enacted in the streets of towns around Germany. “In Schmiedeberg (in Silesia),” reported informants of the Social Democratic exile organization, the Sopade, “something completely out of the ordinary was presented on Sunday, 18 August.” A no- tice appeared in the town paper a week earlier with the announcement: “Reich competition of the SA. On Sunday at 11 a.m. in front of the Rathaus, Sturm 4 R 48 Schmiedeberg passes judgment on a criminal against the state.” On the appointed day, a large crowd gathered to watch the spectacle. Th e Sopade agent gave the setup: “A Nazi newspaper seller has been attacked by a Marxist mob. In the ensuing melee, the Marxists set up a barricade.
    [Show full text]
  • Volksgemeinschaft Und Gleichschaltung
    Kalin-Karli R9 Volksgemeinschaft und Gleichschaltung „Volksgemeinschaft“ Alle Deutschen sollten eine verschworene „Volksgemeinschaft“ bilden. Ausnahmen waren ausgestoßene Gruppen, wie z.B. Juden, Sinti und Roma. Somit sollte es eine Gesellschaft ohne Klassenunterschiede geben. „Du bist nichts, dein Volk ist alles“ war das Motto. Das heißt, die Interessen einzelner wurde dem Gemeinwohl untergeordnet. Alle Menschen sollten als „gleich“ angesehen werden. Herkunft, Beruf, Bildung und Vermögen spielten http://www.bildungswerk-bayern.de/politische-bildung keine Rolle mehr. So war aber kein selbstbestimmtes Leben mehr möglich. Denn diese Vorstellung bedeutete mehr Kontrolle und „Gleichschaltung“. Sowohl im Beruf als auch im Privatleben sollte der „Volksgenosse“ sein Leben und Denken nur nach den Vorstellungen und Ideen der Nationalsozialisten richten. Tat er dies nicht, machte er sich verdächtig und wurde von der Gesellschaft ausgeschlossen. Gleichschaltung – alle im gleichen Marschschritt Die Nationalsozialisten sorgten 1933 dafür, dass alle Länder des Deutschen Reiches mit der Zentrale in Berlin „gleichgeschaltet“ wurden. Parteigenossen der NSDAP übernahmen die staatliche Macht. Bürgermeister wurden abgelöst und NS-Gefolgsleute an ihre Stelle gesetzt. Versammlungsverbote und das Verbot politischer Parteien trugen zur Zerstörung der Demokratie bei. Verbot der Gewerkschaften Nach dem „Tag der nationalen Arbeit“ (1. Mai 1933) wurden die freien Gewerkschaften verboten und alle „schaffenden Deutschen der Stirn und der Faust“ in der Deutschen Arbeiterfront
    [Show full text]
  • Was Hitler a Darwinian?
    Was Hitler a Darwinian? Robert J. Richards The University of Chicago The Darwinian underpinnings of Nazi racial ideology are patently obvious. Hitler's chapter on "Nation and Race" in Mein Kampf discusses the racial struggle for existence in clear Darwinian terms. Richard Weikart, Historian, Cal. State, Stanislaus1 Hamlet: Do you see yonder cloud that's almost in shape of a camel? Shakespeare, Hamlet, III, 2. 1. Introduction . 1 2. The Issues regarding a Supposed Conceptually Causal Connection . 4 3. Darwinian Theory and Racial Hierarchy . 10 4. The Racial Ideology of Gobineau and Chamberlain . 16 5. Chamberlain and Hitler . 27 6. Mein Kampf . 29 7. Struggle for Existence . 37 8. The Political Sources of Hitler’s Anti-Semitism . 41 9. Ethics and Social Darwinism . 44 10. Was the Biological Community under Hitler Darwinian? . 46 11. Conclusion . 52 1. Introduction Several scholars and many religiously conservative thinkers have recently charged that Hitler’s ideas about race and racial struggle derived from the theories of Charles Darwin (1809-1882), either directly or through intermediate sources. So, for example, the historian Richard Weikart, in his book From Darwin to Hitler (2004), maintains: “No matter how crooked the road was from Darwin to Hitler, clearly Darwinism and eugenics smoothed the path for Nazi ideology, especially for the Nazi 1 Richard Weikart, “Was It Immoral for "Expelled" to Connect Darwinism and Nazi Racism?” (http://www.discovery.org/a/5069.) 1 stress on expansion, war, racial struggle, and racial extermination.”2 In a subsequent book, Hitler’s Ethic: The Nazi Pursuit of Evolutionary Progress (2009), Weikart argues that Darwin’s “evolutionary ethics drove him [Hitler] to engage in behavior that the rest of us consider abominable.”3 Other critics have also attempted to forge a strong link between Darwin’s theory and Hitler’s biological notions.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice in the Justice Trial at Nuremberg Stephen J
    University of Baltimore Law Review Volume 46 | Issue 3 Article 4 5-2017 A Court Pure and Unsullied: Justice in the Justice Trial at Nuremberg Stephen J. Sfekas Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr Part of the Fourteenth Amendment Commons, International Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Sfekas, Stephen J. (2017) "A Court Pure and Unsullied: Justice in the Justice Trial at Nuremberg," University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 46 : Iss. 3 , Article 4. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol46/iss3/4 This Peer Reviewed Articles is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Baltimore Law Review by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COURT PURE AND UNSULLIED: JUSTICE IN THE JUSTICE TRIAL AT NUREMBERG* Hon. Stephen J. Sfekas** Therefore, O Citizens, I bid ye bow In awe to this command, Let no man live Uncurbed by law nor curbed by tyranny . Thus I ordain it now, a [] court Pure and unsullied . .1 I. INTRODUCTION In the immediate aftermath of World War II, the common understanding was that the Nazi regime had been maintained by a combination of instruments of terror, such as the Gestapo, the SS, and concentration camps, combined with a sophisticated propaganda campaign.2 Modern historiography, however, has revealed the
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Nazism and Militarism
    EJ-SOCIAL, European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences ISSN: 2736-5522 The Rise of Nazism and Militarism Anping Yang 1 Abstract — The essay discusses the rise of Nazism and II. ECONOMIC RECESSION IN PREWAR GERMANY AND Militarism during interwar Germany and Japan. It compares JAPAN the similarities and differences that existed in the social, economic, and political environment of the two countries. The As is often the case, economic uncertainty drives social and essay approaches the topic by analyzing the cause and effect of political moods. Economic bases determine the distribution economic depression, social upheaval, and unique political of social divisions, that is to say, people are divided into propaganda. The paper intends to provide information about groups due to their different positions and relations by means circumstances when extremism revives, and thus to avoid of production. As a result, recessions and depression often similar conditions in the future. serve as the chief cause of cycles of upheaval, instability, and political change. For this reason, in order to understand the Index Terms — Economic Depression; Militarism; Nazism; World War. differences between the rise of extreme ideologies in both countries it is necessary to begin by looking at their respective I. INTRODUCTION economic histories. Germany and Japan’s dependence on foreign investments created economically fragile conditions, On November 21, 1945, twenty-two Nazi military and contributing to their inability to respond to external financial political leaders were investigated in the Nuremberg Trials in shocks, and inducing government bankruptcy and recession. Germany. Twenty-four major war criminals and seven The primary cause, somehow, was the misguided measures organizations were accused of war crimes by the tribunal, and taken by the government based on inaccurate predictions ten defendants were executed after the adjudication.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Contains 1,126 Words
    No. 19-351 ================================================================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, a foreign state, and STIFTUNG PREUSSICHER KULTURBESITZ, Petitioners, v. ALAN PHILIPP, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- On Writ of Certiorari To The United States Court of Appeals For The D.C. Circuit --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- JOINT APPENDIX --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- JONATHAN M. FREIMAN NICHOLAS M. O’DONNELL Counsel of Record Counsel of Record TADHG DOOLEY ERIKA L. TODD BENJAMIN M. DANIELS SULLIVAN & WORCESTER LLP DAVID R. ROTH One Post Office Square WIGGIN AND DANA LLP Boston, MA 02109 265 Church Street (617) 338-2814 P.O. Box 1832 [email protected] New Haven, CT 06508-1832 Counsel for Respondents (203) 498-4400 [email protected] DAVID L. HALL WIGGIN AND DANA LLP Two Liberty Place 50 S. 16th Street Suite 2925 Philadelphia, PA 19102 (215) 998-8310 Counsel for Petitioners Petition For Certiorari Filed September 16, 2019 Certiorari Granted July 2, 2020 ================================================================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Relevant Docket Entries from the United States District Court for the District
    [Show full text]
  • 1933 Bis 1944 Die „Gleichschaltung”
    1933 bis 1944 Die „Gleichschaltung” Viele Deutsche machten 1929 Vorstands 1949 bis 1973. Die dikta- Für die wahre Idee der Feuerbe- die bittere Erfahrung, auf einem torische Macht gab den National- stattung, im Sinne ihrer Pioniere, überfüllten Arbeitsmarkt nicht Fuß sozialisten die Möglichkeit, das bis hatten die Nazis nicht viel übrig. fassen zu können. Arbeitslosigkeit dahin organisch gewachsene Ge- Wie in vielen Bereichen miss- und Massenverelendung kenn- füge des Vereins durch diktatori- brauchten sie auch diese Idee für zeichneten in der Wirtschaftskrise sche Eingriffe, Verfügungen und ihre Gräueltaten. Das heute noch die Alltagssituation breiter Bevöl- Maßnahmen zu lenken, wie es gültige „Reichsgesetz” über die kerungsschichten. Resignation und ihnen beliebte. Der Verein wurde Feuerbestattung" vom 15. Mai Verzweiflung waren Begleiterschei- gleichgeschaltet. Die 625000 Mit- 1934 brachte gegenüber den frü- nungen der Krise, in der Tausende glieder und Rücklagen von rund heren Landesgesetzen zunächst ihr als nutzlos empfundenes Leben 15 Millionen Reichsmark (RM) wur- einige Erleichterungen. In recht- freiwillig beendeten. Andere sahen den von den Nationalsozialisten licher Beziehung wurde die Feuer- in Adolf Hitler „die letzte Hoff- übernommen. Der Verein wurde in bestattung der Erdbestattung nung” auf Arbeit und Auskommen. „Großdeutsche Feuerbestattung gleichgestellt. Es wurde ferner be- Mit der Machtergreifung der Natio- V.V.a.G. zu Berlin” umbenannt. stimmt, dass sich die Bestattungs- nalsozialisten 1933 begann das art grundsätzlich nach dem Willen dunkelste Kapitel deutscher Ge- Im Zuge der Gleichsetzung von der Verstorbenen zu richten habe. schichte – auch für den Volksfeuer- Partei und Staat wurde der bis da- Nur wenn eine solche Willenskund- Bestattungsverein. hin eigenständige Verband zum gebung nicht vorliegt, können die „Großdeutschen Verband der Es ist wohl keine Überraschung, Feuerbestattungsvereine” mit zen- dass ein so bedeutender Verein wie tralistischer, autokratischer Spitze der Volksfeuer-Bestattungsverein umgestaltet.
    [Show full text]
  • “Antisemitism Is a Barometer of Democracy”
    “ANTISEMITISM IS A BAROMETER OF DEMOCRACY”: CONFRONTING THE NAZI PAST IN THE WEST GERMAN ‘SWASTIKA EPIDEMIC’, 1959-1960 by Alan Jones Bachelor of Arts, University of New Brunswick, 2017 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate Academic Unit of History Supervisor: Lisa Todd, PhD, History Examining Board: Gary Waite, PhD, History, Chair Sean Kennedy, PhD, History Jason Bell, PhD, Philosophy This thesis is accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK May, 2019 ©Alan Jones, 2019 Abstract The vandalism of a synagogue in Cologne, West Germany on Christmas Day 1959 by two men in their mid-twenties sparked a wave of Antisemitic and Nazi vandalism across West Germany and the Western world. The “swastika epidemic,” as it came to be known, ignited serious debates surrounding public memory of the Second World War in Germany, and the extent to which West Germany had dealt with its Nazi past. The swastika epidemic became a powerful example of what critics at the time argued was the failure of West Germany to properly confront its Nazi past through the reconstruction policies of Konrad Adenauer. This thesis examines the reactions of West Germany’s government, led by Konrad Adenauer, to the swastika epidemic and its place in the shifting narratives of memory in the postwar era. Adenauer’s reactions to the epidemic were steeped in the status quo memory narratives of the preceding decade which would be increasingly challenged throughout the 1960s. ii Acknowledgements There are several organizations without whose help I would not have been able to finish this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Prominent Nazi Lawyer – and Key Architect of the 'Brussels
    Master Plan of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition – Blueprint for the ‘Brussels EU’ Chapter 2 WALTER HALLSTEIN: Prominent Nazi Lawyer – And Key Architect of the ‘Brussels EU’ Chapter 2 Walter Hallstein (1901-1982) Walter Hallstein was a prominent lawyer involved in the legal and ad- ministrative planning for a post-WWII Europe under the control of the Nazis and their corporate allies, the Oil and Drug Cartel IG Far- ben. Hallstein represented the new breed of members of the Nazi/Cartel Coalition. He was trained by legal teachers whose primary goal was to sabotage the ‘Versailles Treaty’ defining the reparation payments imposed on Germany after it lost WWI. Early on in his career Hall- stein received a special training at the ‘Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Berlin.’ This private institute was largely financed by the IG•Farben Cartel to raise its scientific and legal cadres for the Cartel’s next at- tempts at the conquest and control of Europe and the world. While the rule of the Nazis ended in 1945, the rule of their accom- plices, the IG Farben Cartel and its successors BAYER, BASF, and HOECHST had just begun. As a strategic part of their plan to launch the third attempt at the conquest of Europe, they placed – a mere decade after their previous attempt had failed – one of their own at the helm of the new cartel ‘politburo’ in Brussels: Walter Hallstein. This chapter documents that the fundamentally undemocratic con- struct of today’s ‘Brussels EU’ is no coincidence. Hallstein, a promi- nent Nazi lawyer – and expert on the IG•Farben concern – was chosen by these corporate interests to become the first EU Commission pres- ident with a specific assignment: to model the ‘Brussels EU’ after the original plans of the Nazi/IG Farben coalition to rule Europe through a ‘Central Cartel Office’.
    [Show full text]
  • Schmitten in the USA
    Schmitten in the USA David Dyzenhaus 2020-04-04T10:11:35 Michael Taggart, the late great New Zealand public lawyer, once described a colleague as ‘Schmitten’, a customarily brilliant way of expressing his puzzlement at how Carl Schmitt’s ‘dangerous mind’ seems so alluring to some Anglo-American lawyers. I doubt that even Mike was capable of imagining the extent to which Adrian Vermeule, a prominent constitutional US lawyer, teaching at Harvard Law School, has not only been Schmitten, but has even surpassed his master in some respects with his essay in the Atlantic, ‘Beyond Originalism: The dominant conservative philosophy for interpreting the Constitution has served its purpose, and scholars ought to develop a more moral framework’. This article does not mention Schmitt. Its argument is presented as a conservative alternative to Dworkinian liberal constitutionalism different from and superior to the versions of originalism favoured by the right of the American legal academy. In a way the argument should appeal to those who have criticized originalists for using implausible claims about what as a matter of fact the legal meaning was at the time the Constitution was written as a disguise for a political agenda for dealing with contemporary issues that no one at that earlier time could have envisaged. But in suggesting that conservative judges should now embrace ‘illiberal legalism’, a deliberate riff off Victor Orbán’s ‘illiberal democracy’, Vermeule advocates abandoning the Constitution altogether as an agreed basis for legal argument. It is significant in this regard that the Hungarian Parliament has just enacted a law, on the pretext of responding to the pandemic, that gives Orbán indefinite authority to rule Hungary by decree.
    [Show full text]
  • From Humanism to Nazism: Antiquity in the Work of Houston Stewart Chamberlain
    Miranda Revue pluridisciplinaire du monde anglophone / Multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal on the English- speaking world 11 | 2015 Expressions of Environment in Euroamerican Culture / Antique Bodies in Nineteenth Century British Literature and Culture From Humanism to Nazism: Antiquity in the Work of Houston Stewart Chamberlain Johann Chapoutot Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/6680 DOI: 10.4000/miranda.6680 ISSN: 2108-6559 Publisher Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès Electronic reference Johann Chapoutot, “From Humanism to Nazism: Antiquity in the Work of Houston Stewart Chamberlain ”, Miranda [Online], 11 | 2015, Online since 23 July 2015, connection on 16 February 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/6680 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/miranda.6680 This text was automatically generated on 16 February 2021. Miranda is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. From Humanism to Nazism: Antiquity in the Work of Houston Stewart Chamberlain 1 From Humanism to Nazism: Antiquity in the Work of Houston Stewart Chamberlain Johann Chapoutot 1 Houston Stewart Chamberlain was a typical member of the 19th century British gentry but had the most atypical destiny―a destiny which was built around the culture of two countries: England which he left early and Germany which was to become his true home. The son of a naval officer―his father was an admiral in the Royal Navy –, he spent his whole youth travelling around Europe. After attending a lycée in Versailles and a boarding school in Cheltenham, he visited destination spas and various health resorts―he did not have a very sound constitution―with his chaperon and a tutor.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    Case 1:15-cv-00266 Document 1 Filed 02/23/15 Page 1 of 71 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) Alan PHILIPP, ) 5 Raeburn Close ) London NW11 6UG, United Kingdom, ) ) and ) ) Gerald G. STIEBEL, ) 3716 Old Santa Fe Trail ) Santa Fe, NM 87505, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, a foreign ) state, ) ) and ) ) STIFTUNG PREUSSISCHER KULTURBESITZ, ) ) Von-der-Heydt-Str. 16-18 ) 10785 Berlin, Germany, ) ) Defendants. ) COMPLAINT This is a civil action by plaintiffs Alan Philipp (“Philipp”), and Gerald G. Stiebel (“Stiebel,” together with Philipp, the “plaintiffs”), for the restitution of a collection of medieval relics known as the “Welfenschatz” or the “Guelph Treasure” now wrongfully in the possession of the defendant Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz, a/k/a the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation (the “SPK”). The SPK is an instrumentality of the defendant Federal Republic of Germany (“Germany,” together with the SPK, the “defendants”). Case 1:15-cv-00266 Document 1 Filed 02/23/15 Page 2 of 71 INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT 1. This is an action to recover the Welfenschatz, a unique collection of medieval relics and devotional art that was sold by victims of persecution of the Nazi regime under duress, and far below actual market value. Those owners were a consortium of three art dealer firms in Frankfurt: J.&S. Goldschmidt, I. Rosenbaum, and Z.M. Hackenbroch (together, the “Consortium”). Zacharias Max Hackenbroch (“Hackenbroch”), Isaak Rosenbaum (“Rosenbaum”), Saemy Rosenberg (“Rosenberg”), and Julius Falk Goldschmidt (“Goldschmidt”) were the owners of those firms, together with plaintiffs’ ancestors and/or predecessors-in-interest in this action.
    [Show full text]