Boys, Writing, and the Literacy Gender Gap: What We Know, What We Think Ew Know Nancy Disenhaus University of Vermont
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2015 Boys, Writing, And The Literacy Gender Gap: What We Know, What We Think eW Know Nancy Disenhaus University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Part of the Education Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the Reading and Language Commons Recommended Citation Disenhaus, Nancy, "Boys, Writing, And The Literacy Gender Gap: What We Know, What We Think eW Know" (2015). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 330. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/330 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOYS, WRITING, AND THE LITERACY GENDER GAP: WHAT WE KNOW, WHAT WE THINK WE KNOW A Dissertation Presented by Nancy Disenhaus to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Education Specializing in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies May, 2015 Defense Date: March 27, 2015 Dissertation Examination Committee: Cynthia C. Reyes, Ph.D., Advisor Susanmarie Harrington, Ph.D., Chairperson Cynthia I. Gerstl-Pepin, Ph.D. Jill Mattuck Tarule, Ph.D. Cynthia J. Forehand, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College ABSTRACT The existence of a persistent gender gap in literacy achievement, and particularly in writing, is not in dispute: boys trail girls in every assessment at state, national, and international levels. Yet although this basic fact is not in dispute, nearly everything else concerning the gender gap in literacy achievement—its causes, consequences, and potential solutions—remains hotly contested, particularly in the public and professional discourse. Scholarly research offers insights that frequently challenge the prevailing public discourse, but this research has been conducted primarily in the U.K., Australia, and Canada, leaving the experiences of U.S. students largely unexplored. Herein lies the problem: an inadequate (or worse, inaccurate) understanding of the context, causes, and realities of boys’ writing experiences can lead to proposed policy and pedagogy solutions that range from the ineffective to the potentially harmful, with unintended consequences for both boys and girls that may worsen the underlying conditions implicated in boys’ literacy underachievement. Equity demands that we address, in particular, the poor writing achievement of boys of low socioeconomic backgrounds. It is important that policy-makers consider the question of “which boys,” as the writing achievement gap is far more dramatic for boys from a background of poverty than for middle-class boys. This study employed qualitative methods and a phenomenological lens to explore the writing experiences, attitudes, and beliefs of 21 young men currently enrolled in four colleges and universities in two New England states, including first-year and senior-year college students. The data collected from interviews and writing samples contradicted a number of the generalizations about boys prevalent in the public discourse, and offered a more nuanced view of the role of gender in boys’ writing experiences than that presented in much of the scholarly discourse. The results of this study also challenge a number of commonly held beliefs about boys’ and young men’s writing motivations and preferences. The study’s findings can contribute toward the ultimate goal of improving educators’ and policy-makers’ responses to the gender gap in writing by offering a more nuanced and accurate understanding of the writing experiences of boys and young men. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to acknowledge and thank the many people in my life whose contributions to my efforts, my scholarship, and my passions have led me to this moment. Their love, support, and belief in me and in my work have sustained me through the years of perseverance this project has required. “Perseverance furthers”—but without the support of the following people, I could not have mustered the perseverance to reach this milestone. Dr. Cynthia C. Reyes, who has been a treasured mentor and friend during my years of study, nurturing my belief in myself and my project, and supporting me in my sometimes halting progress along the road of scholarship. It has been a deep privilege and pleasure to have had Dr. Reyes at my side for these years, as advisor, intellectual model, and ultimately, colleague and friend. Dr. Cynthia J. Gerstl-Pepin, whose enthusiasm for my project throughout its duration, from its earliest glimmerings as a pilot study in her introductory qualitative research course to its current form, helped me see this topic as an area in which an important contribution could be made—and to see myself as the qualitative researcher who could make that contribution. Dr. Jill Mattuck Tarule, an invaluable intellectual mentor who has kept me mindful of the importance of considering stages of adolescent and young adult development as lenses through which to view my participants’ writing experiences. Her rigor mixed with encouragement and support helped me persevere to compose the best possible version of this dissertation I was capable of producing. Dr. Judith A. Aiken, who has mentored me from afar for many years, and has for the past five years been an anchor as I made my way through the world of scholarship I had re- entered from the very different world of high school teaching. Dr. Susanmarie Harrington, whose willingness to serve as my outside chair gave me the great gift of her thoughtful eye as a scholar as well as her expertise and experience in nurturing student writers. Dr. Robyn Warhol, the treasured mentor and friend who first reintroduced me to the joys of intellectual life and scholarship when my hunger for learning led me to her Brontës seminar one summer years ago. I would not be here without her. Dr. Susan Dinitz, my first mentor as a writing teacher, and a valued friend and colleague every step of the way Dr. Toby Fulwiler, to whom I owe a piece of endlessly valuable advice about how to get the writing done: “Perseverance and chunking.” ii Dr. Lawrence Shelton, who started me on my exploration of the complicated world of boys and the young men they become—and whose unflagging interest in my work has encouraged me to take myself seriously as I worked to become an expert on my topic. The dear friends who have listened patiently to my stumbling efforts to explain what exactly I was doing, and encouraged me through the years of this effort: Judy, Nancy, Karen, Megan, Linden, Eileen, Audrey, Mel, and Rhea. Salli Griggs, whose sense of humor, seemingly infinite patience, and perfectionist’s eye and expertise have kept me sane through the home stretch. The young men and women, my students over the years, who have taught me so much and have kept me mindful, as one student commented, that I “really love to scholar out.” My sister Helen, my head cheerleader and Believer-in-Chief. My son Dylan, whose view of me as the Energizer Bunny—“Takes a lickin’ and keeps on tickin’”—has sustained and inspired me for years. My husband Tom, whose patience, wisdom, nurturance of me in every way, and continuing belief in me and my work have made it possible for me to take on, and ultimately to complete, this endeavor. He has been the sine qua non of my perseverance in this and every other meaningful challenge and effort over many years. My Big Fish and “black swans,” who have been such fine company in recent years and whose generosity, humor, and insight I will miss when they disappear from my life. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................... vi CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1 The Persistent Problem of Boys’ Low Literacy Achievement ........................... 1 The Present Study ............................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................................................... 6 The Context: Competing Discourses, Social Realities ....................................... 6 From “Condition” to “Problem”: Equity, Class, and the Importance of Definition .................................................................................................. 8 Themes in the Professional and Public Discourses........................................... 12 What School Leaders are Reading: The Discourse in the Professional Press ...................................................................................................... 12 What Parents and Other Stakeholders are Seeing: The Discourse in the Popular Press ............................................................................... 14 Themes in the Scholarly Discourse .................................................................. 20 Multiple Masculinities ............................................................................... 21 Masculinity as Performance: Patrolling the Boundaries, Maintaining the Gender Order..................................................................................