DOCSLIB.ORG

Is the Department of Justice Politicizing the Hiring and Firing of U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Is the Department of Justice Politicizing the Hiring and Firing of U.S S. HRG. 110–495 PRESERVING PROSECUTORIAL INDEPENDENCE: IS THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE POLITICIZING THE HIRING AND FIRING OF U.S. ATTORNEYS? HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 6, MARCH 29, MAY 15, JUNE 5, JULY 11, AND AUGUST 2, 2007 Serial No. J–110–14 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:30 Sep 18, 2008 Jkt 035800 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\35800.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC PRESERVING PROSECUTORIAL INDEPENDENCE: IS THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE POLITICIZING THE HIRING AND FIRING OF U.S. ATTORNEYS? VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:30 Sep 18, 2008 Jkt 035800 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\35800.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC S. HRG. 110–495 PRESERVING PROSECUTORIAL INDEPENDENCE: IS THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE POLITICIZING THE HIRING AND FIRING OF U.S. ATTORNEYS? HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 6, MARCH 29, MAY 15, JUNE 5, JULY 11, AND AUGUST 2, 2007 Serial No. J–110–14 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 35–800 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:30 Sep 18, 2008 Jkt 035800 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\35800.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JON KYL, Arizona RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois JOHN CORNYN, Texas BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island TOM COBURN, Oklahoma BRUCE A. COHEN, Chief Counsel and Staff Director MICHAEL O’NEILL, Republican Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:30 Sep 18, 2008 Jkt 035800 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\35800.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S MARCH 6, 2007 STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Feingold, Hon. Russell D., a U.S. Senator from the State of Wisconsin ............. 28 Feinstein, Hon. Dianne, a U.S. Senator from the State of California ................. 5 Kennedy, Hon. Edward M., a U.S. Senator from the State of Massachusetts, prepared statement .............................................................................................. 57 Kyl, Hon. Jon, a U.S. Senator from the State of Arizona .................................... 7 Leahy, Hon. Patrick J., a U.S. Senator from the State of Vermont .................... 11 prepared statement .......................................................................................... 65 Schumer, Hon. Charles E., a U.S. Senator from the State of New York ............ 1 Specter, Hon. Arlen, a U.S. Senator from the State of Pennsylvania ................. 3 WITNESSES Cummins, H.E. ‘‘Bud’’, III, former U.S. Attorney, Eastern District of Arkan- sas, Little Rock, Arkansas ................................................................................... 16 Iglesias, David C., former U.S. Attorney, District of New Mexico, Albu- querque, New Mexico ........................................................................................... 13 Lam, Carol, former U.S. Attorney, Southern District of California, San Diego, California .............................................................................................................. 9 McKay, John, former U.S. Attorney, Western District of Washington, Seattle, Washington ........................................................................................................... 15 SUBMISSIONS FOR THE RECORD Bogden, Daniel G., Esq., former U.S. Attorney for the District of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, letter ............................................................................................ 53 Cummins, H.E. ‘‘Bud’’, III, former U.S. Attorney, Eastern District of Arkan- sas, Little Rock, Arkansas, e-mail ...................................................................... 54 Domenici, Hon. Pete V., a U.S. Senator from the State of New Mexico, statement .............................................................................................................. 55 Kent, Donald H., Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Legislative and Inter- governmental Affairs, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, D.C., letter ...................................................................................................................... 59 Lam, Carol, former U.S. Attorney, Southern District of California, San Diego, California; H.E. ‘‘Bud’’ Cummins, III, former U.S. Attorney, Eastern District of Arkansas, Little Rock, Arkansas, David C. Iglesias, former U.S. Attorney, District of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; John McKay, former U.S. Attorney, Western District of Washington, Seattle, Washington, joint statement .............................................................................................................. 62 Moschella, William E., Assistant Attorney General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., letter and attachment .......................................................... 67 Wilson, Hon. Heather, a Representative in Congress from the State of New Mexico, statement ................................................................................................ 72 MARCH 29, 2007 STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Leahy, Hon. Patrick J., a U.S. Senator from the State of Vermont .................... 73 prepared statement .......................................................................................... 199 (III) VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:30 Sep 18, 2008 Jkt 035800 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\35800.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC IV Page Schumer, Hon. Charles E., a U.S. Senator from the State of New York ............ 75 Sessions, Hon. Jeff, a U.S. Senator from the State of Alabama .......................... 83 Specter, Hon. Arlen, a U.S. Senator from the State of Pennshylvania ............... 81 WITNESS Sampson, D. Kyle, former Chief of Staff to the Attorney General of the United States, Washington, D.C. ........................................................................ 77 QUESTION AND ANSWER Response of D. Kyle Sampson to a question submitted by Senator Brownback 177 SUBMISSIONS FOR THE RECORD Associated Press, Lara Jakes Jordan, article ........................................................ 178 Fasano, Adele J., Director, Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protec- tion, letter ............................................................................................................. 180 Fridman, Daniel, Counsel to the Depurty Attorney General, Department of Justice, memorandum .......................................................................................... 183 Hertling, Richard A., Acting Assistant Attorney General, Department of Jus- tice, letters and attachments ............................................................................... 189 Sampson, D. Kyle, former Chief of Staff to the Attorney General of the United States, Washington, D.C., statement and e-mails ................................ 201 Washington Post, March 22, 2007, article ............................................................. 207 MAY 15, 2007 STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Leahy, Hon. Patrick J., a U.S. Senator from the State of Vermont, prepared statement .............................................................................................................. 258 Schumer, Hon. Charles E., a U.S. Senator from the State of New York ............ 209 Specter, Hon. Arlen, a U.S. Senator from the State of Pennsylvania ................. 211 WITNESS Comey, James B., former Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. ................................................................................................. 213 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Responses of James B. Comey to questions submitted by Senators Feingold, Leahy and Schumer ............................................................................................. 241 SUBMISSIONS FOR THE RECORD Feingold, Hon. Russell, D., Hon. Charles E. Schumer, Hon. Edward M. Ken- nedy, and Hon. Richard J. Durbin, United States Senate, Washington, D.C., joint letter ................................................................................................... 254 Gonzales, Alberto R., Attorney General of the United States, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., letter .................................................................... 257 JUNE 5, 2007 STATEMENT OF COMMITTEE MEMBER Kennedy, Hon. Edward M., a U.S. Senator from the State of Massachusetts, prepared statement .............................................................................................. 371 Leahy, Hon. Patrick J., a U.S Senator from the State of Vermont ..................... 261 prepared statement .......................................................................................... 374 WITNESSES Graves, Todd, former U.S. Attorney, Western District of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Investigation of Allegations of Politicized Hiring by Monica Goodling and Other Staff in the Office of the Attorney General
    U.S. Department of Justice An Investigation of Allegations of Politicized Hiring by Monica Goodling and Other Staff in the Office of the Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility Office of the Inspector General July 28, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................ i CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION................................................................. 1 I. Scope of the Investigation.................................................................. 1 II. Methodology of the Investigation ....................................................... 2 III. Organization of this Report ............................................................... 3 CHAPTER TWO BACKGROUND.................................................................. 5 I. Monica Goodling ............................................................................... 5 II. Kyle Sampson ................................................................................... 6 III. Susan Richmond and Jan Williams................................................... 7 IV. Department Components and Personnel ........................................... 7 V. Hiring Standards ............................................................................ 11 A. Department Career and Political Attorney Positions ............... 11 B. Legal Standards..................................................................... 12 CHAPTER THREE GOODLING’S ROLE
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2007 No. 47 Senate The Senate met at 2 p.m. and was appoint the Honorable MARK L. PRYOR, a After all, this was a President who called to order by the Honorable MARK Senator from the State of Arkansas, to per- won two elections by the barest of mar- L. PRYOR, a Senator from the State of form the duties of the Chair. gins, first by the Supreme Court. Yet Arkansas. ROBERT C. BYRD, after 9/11, instead of uniting the coun- President pro tempore. try, he has chosen to push the envelope PRAYER Mr. PRYOR thereupon assumed the of his authority. On everything from The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- chair as Acting President pro tempore. the runup to the war in Iraq, to the fered the following prayer: f plan to destroy Social Security, to the Let us pray: RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY use of warrantless wiretapping, this ad- Lord, You have promised to work for LEADER ministration has governed without the good of those who love You. Work compromise. in the lives of our lawmakers, The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- The political purge of U.S. attorneys strengthening them for every problem, pore. The majority leader is recog- is only the latest example of this Presi- trial, and temptation they face. Open nized. dent’s unhealthy disregard for checks their eyes to see Your hand at work f and balances.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents 1. Defense Travel System (DTS) – #4373 2. DOD Travel Payments Improper Payment Measure – #4372 3. Follow up Amendment 4. DOD Earmarks Cost and Grading Amendment – #4370 5. Limitation on DoD Contract Performance Bonuses – #4371 1. Amendment # 4373 – No Federal funds for the future development and operation of the Defense Travel System Background The Defense Travel System (DTS) is an end-to-end electronic travel system intended to integrate all travel functions, from authorization through ticket purchase to accounting for the Department of Defense. The system was initiated in 1998 and it was supposed to be fully deployed by 2002. DTS is currently in the final phase of a six-year contract that expires September 30, 2006. In its entire history, the system has never met a deadline, never stayed within cost estimates, and never performed adequately. To date, DTS has cost the taxpayers $474 million – more than $200 million more than it was originally projected to cost. It is still not fully deployed. It is grossly underutilized. And tests have repeatedly shown that it does not consistently find the lowest applicable airfare – so even where it is deployed and used, it does not really achieve the savings proposed. This amendment prohibits continued funding of DTS and instead requires DOD to shift to a fixed price per transaction e-travel system used by government agencies in the civilian sector, as set up under General Services Administration (GSA) contracts. Quotes of Senators from last year’s debate • Senator Allen stated during the debate last year that “as a practical matter we would like to have another year or so to see (DTS) fully implemented.” • Senator Coleman stated during the debate, “… if we cannot get the right answers we should pull the plug, but now is not the time to pull the plug.
    [Show full text]
  • \\Crewserver05\Data\Research & Investigations\Most Ethical Public
    Stephen Abraham Exhibits EXHIBIT 1 Unlikely Adversary Arises to Criticize Detainee Hearings - New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/23/us/23gitmo.html?pagewanted=print July 23, 2007 Unlikely Adversary Arises to Criticize Detainee Hearings By WILLIAM GLABERSON NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. — Stephen E. Abraham’s assignment to the Pentagon unit that runs the hearings at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, seemed a perfect fit. A lawyer in civilian life, he had been decorated for counterespionage and counterterrorism work during 22 years as a reserve Army intelligence officer in which he rose to the rank of lieutenant colonel. His posting, just as the Guantánamo hearings were accelerating in 2004, gave him a close-up view of the government’s detention policies. It also turned him into one of the Bush administration’s most unlikely adversaries. In June, Colonel Abraham became the first military insider to criticize publicly the Guantánamo hearings, which determine whether detainees should be held indefinitely as enemy combatants. Just days after detainees’ lawyers submitted an affidavit containing his criticisms, the United States Supreme Court reversed itself and agreed to hear an appeal arguing that the hearings are unjust and that detainees have a right to contest their detentions in federal court. Some lawyers say Colonel Abraham’s account — of a hearing procedure that he described as deeply flawed and largely a tool for commanders to rubber-stamp decisions they had already made — may have played an important role in the justices’ highly unusual reversal. That decision once again brought the administration face to face with the vexing legal, political and diplomatic questions about the fate of Guantánamo and the roughly 360 men still held there.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle Making the Calls T O the Usas. Let Us Know
    Scolinos. Tasia From: Scolinos, Tasia Sent: Friday, November 17,2006 2:00 PM To : '[email protected]' Subject: RE: USA replacement plan Thanks for flagging - we are not looped in - first I have heard of it. Let me call up there and figure out what is happening here and get back to you. Also, neither Brian nor I can be on the 3:30 call by the way - conflicting meetings - let me know if that is a problem. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 1:29 PM To: Scolinos, Tasia Subject: Fw: USA replacement plan Importance: High Are you looped in on this? What is your comms plan? -----Original Message----- From: Kelley, William K. To: Fiddelke, Debbie S.; Jennings, Jeffery S.; Martin, Catherine Sent: Fri Nov 17 12:32:06 2006 Subject: FW: USA replacement plan <<USA replacement plan.doc>> The email below, and the attached document, reflect a plan by DOJ to replace several US Attorneys. By statute, US Attorneys serve for four year terms, which are commonly (but not always) extended by inaction -- in practice, they serve until replaced. They serve at the pleasure of the President, but often have very strong home-state political juice, including with their Senators. Before executing this plan, we wanted to give your offices a heads up and seek input on changes that might reduce the profile or political fallout. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 11:02 AM To: Miers, Harriet; Kelley, William K.
    [Show full text]
  • N Ieman Reports
    NIEMAN REPORTS Nieman Reports One Francis Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 Nieman Reports THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 21 ST CENTURY MUCKRAKERS THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION HARVARDAT UNIVERSITY 21st Century Muckrakers Who Are They? How Do They Do Their Work? Words & Reflections: Secrets, Sources and Silencing Watchdogs Journalism 2.0 End Note went to the Carnegie Endowment in New York but of the Oakland Tribune, and Maynard was throw- found times to return to Cambridge—like many, ing out questions fast and furiously about my civil I had “withdrawal symptoms” after my Harvard rights coverage. I realized my interview was lasting ‘to promote and elevate the year—and would meet with Tenney. She came to longer than most, and I wondered, “Is he trying to my wedding in Toronto in 1984, and we tried to knock me out of competition?” Then I happened to keep in touch regularly. Several of our class, Peggy glance over at Tenney and got the only smile from standards of journalism’ Simpson, Peggy Engel, Kat Harting, and Nancy the group—and a warm, welcoming one it was. I Day visited Tenney in her assisted living facility felt calmer. Finally, when the interview ended, I in Cambridge some years ago, during a Nieman am happy to say, Maynard leaped out of his chair reunion. She cared little about her own problems and hugged me. Agnes Wahl Nieman and was always interested in others. Curator Jim Tenney was a unique woman, and I thoroughly Thomson was the public and intellectual face of enjoyed her friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • A Gift from Alumni to the University Alumni Park by the Numbers
    A GIFT FROM ALUMNI TO THE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI PARK BY THE NUMBERS CONTENTS 1.3 Size of the park in acres 7,877 Trees, shrubs, grasses, and Park Yourself Here ..................................................................................2–3 perennials planted A Plan 109 Years in the Making ................................................................4–5 500 Linear feet of improved shoreline Content and Conversation...................................................................... 6–7 50 Park exhibits, including Make a Splash .........................................................................................8–9 sculptures, statues, panels, and inscriptions The Bucky Statue ...................................................................................10–11 4,000 Donors who contributed to the Your Guide to the Lights ...................................................................... 12–13 creation of Alumni Park and One Alumni Place Your Home Base ................................................................................... 14–15 17 Number of boat slips at the World Wide Park ...................................................................................16–17 Goodspeed Family Pier UW Alumni Featured in the Park .......................................................... 18–21 207 Alumni names inscribed in the park: 123 featured alumni Thank You, Friends of Alumni Park ..................................................... 22–28 plus 84 donors and contributors 4 Number of alumni Nobel Prize laureates featured
    [Show full text]
  • Slate.Com Table of Contents Explainer Can You Be a Gay Mormon?
    Slate.com Table of Contents explainer Can You Be a Gay Mormon? fighting words Advanced Search Fidel Gets Religion architecture foreigners For Sale: 200,000-Square-Foot Box Still Waiting for Chinese Democracy books foreigners How To Read the Quran War of Words books gabfest The Dark Matter of Our Cherished Document The Quaker Meeting Gabfest corrections gaming Corrections Wii Will Rock You! culture gabfest hey, wait a minute The Culture Gabfest, Identity Crisis Edition Only in America? culturebox hot document I Vant To Upend Your Expectations CBS's Dream Team culturebox human nature The J. Crew Catalog Destroyed My Spirit Children of the Clones dear prudence human nature The Devil, They Say Drone Ask, Drone Tell drink jurisprudence What To Drink on Thanksgiving I Beg Your Pardon dvd extras low concept Buster Keaton's The General Dear President Obama explainer moneybox Explainer's Wildfire Roundup Harvard's Investment Errors explainer moneybox The Globavore's Dilemma The Subprime Good Guys explainer movies Explainer's Same-Sex-Marriage Roundup Twilight explainer music box The Evergold State Welcome to the Jumble explainer other magazines Explainer's Pirate Roundup America's Checkup explainer other magazines Measuring the National Carbon Footprint The Redprint explainer poem Behold the Power of Michelle "Omaha Beach" explainer politics The Millionaire Arsonist Dingell Buried Copyright 2007 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive Co. LLC 1/85 politics the undercover economist Obama's White House, Clinton's Team Only the Good Buy Young politics
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Identity and Role of United States Attorneys
    Rethinking the Identity and Role of United States Attorneys Sara Sun Beale* The reputation and credibility of the Department of Justice were badly tarnished during the Bush administration. This article focuses on concerns regarding the role of partisan politics.1 Critics charge that during the Bush administration improper partisan political considerations pervasively influenced a wide range of decisions including the selection of immigration judges, summer interns and line attorneys; the assignment of career attorneys to particular details; the evaluation of the performance of United States Attorneys; and the decision whether and when to file charges in cases with political ramifications. The Inspector General’s lengthy and highly critical reports have substantiated some of these charges.2 The first two Inspector General (IG) Reports found that the Department improperly used political criteria in hiring and assigning some immigration judges, interns, and career prosecutors.3 The third report * Charles L.B. Lowndes Professor, Duke Law School, Durham, N.C. I would like to acknowledge the outstanding research assistance provided by Michael Devlin, Meghan Ferguson, Amy Taylor, and Molly Brownfield, and the helpful comments of Norman Abrams, Albert Alschuler, Rachel Barkow, Anthony Barkow, Candace Carroll, Colm Connolly, Ronald Goldstock, Bruce Green, Lisa Kern Griffin, James Jacobs, Susan Klein, Daniel Richman, and Adam Safwat. Of course any errors are my own. 1 Other serious concerns about the Department have been raised, particularly in connection with its role in the war on terror. For example, the Department has been the subject of intense criticism for legal analysis that led to the authorization of brutal interrogation techniques for detainees.
    [Show full text]
  • Depoliticizing the Interim Appointments of US Attorneys
    LIVE AND LEARN: DEPOLITICIZING THE INTERIM APPOINTMENTS OF U.S. ATTORNEYS t Laurie L. Levenson The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done.' I. INTRODUCTION U.S. Attorneys play a special role in our federal criminal justice system. As the representatives of the federal government, they have the responsibility of enforcing federal laws in their respective districts.2 3 Although U.S. Attorneys serve "at the pleasure of the President," the4 goal is to have a fair and impartial prosecutor administering the laws. The recent firing of eight U.S. Attorneys has called into question at- tempts to politicize the role of this vital Office. By attempting to give the Attorney General the power to make indefinite interim appointments, I Professor of Law, William M. Rains Fellow & Director, Center for Ethical Advocacy, Loyola Law School. Thank you to John McKay, a man of true integrity, for inviting me to participate in the Symposium at Seattle University School of Law. His courage, as well as that of his fellow U.S. Attorneys, Paul Carlton, David Iglesias, Bill Cummins III, and Carol Lam, should serve as an inspi- ration for others dedicated to public service. I also wish to extend my gratitude to the editors of the Seattle University Law Review and to my wonderful research assistants, Emil Petrossian, Lindsay Meurs, William Smyth, and Mary Gordon.
    [Show full text]
  • Disciplining Criminal Justice: the Peril Amid the Promise of Numbers
    YALE LAW & POLICY REVIEW Disciplining Criminal Justice: The Peril amid the Promise of Numbers Mary De Ming Fan* Introduction ........................................................................................................... 2 Governing Governance and the Manufacture of "Objective" Visibility ............ 1O A. The Law of Making Performance Visible ................................................ 14 B. Difficulties Defining Criminal Justice in the Idiom of Targets .............. 16 C. Bending the Bounds of the Officially Sanctioned .................................. 24 II. Expressive, Expiatory "Deliverables". ............................................................. 27 A. At the Point of Policy Failure ................................................................... 30 B. Numbers that Do Not Attain Aims ......................................................... 36 C. What Expiation by Numerical Proxy Effaces ......................................... 42 1. Aim ing Beyond the Baseline ............................................................ 42 2. Effacing H igher Aim s ........................................................................ 49 III. Toward a Policy Embrace of Values and Numbers in Qualitative Context ... 57 A. Q ualitative Perspective ............................................................................ 57 B. How Law and Policy Can Be Conducive to Qualitative Evaluation ........... 59 C on clusion ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unofficial Transcript
    1 RPTS JOHNSON DCMN BURRELL COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, WASHINGTON, D.C. UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT INTERVIEW OF: KARL C. ROVE Tuesday, July 7, 2009 Washington, D.C. The interview in the above matter was held at 2138 Conference Room, Rayburn House Office Building, commencing at 9:00 a.m. 2 Appearances: For COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: ADAM B. SCHIFF, MAJORITY MEMBER J. RANDY FORBES, MINORITY MEMBER ELLIOT MINCBERG, MAJORITY CHIEF COUNSEL - INVESTIGATIONS AND OVERSIGHT ERIC TAMARKIN, MAJORITY COUNSEL SAM BRODERICK-SOKOL, MAJORITY OVERSIGHT COUNSEL PHIL TAHTAKRAN, LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR FOR CONGRESSMAN SCHIFF DANIEL M. FLORES, CHIEF MINORITY COUNSEL, SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMERCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW RICHARD ALAN HERTLING, REPUBLICAN DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF/POLICY DIRECTOR CRYSTAL ROBERTS JEZIERSKI, REPUBLICAN CHIEF OVERSIGHT COUNSEL ZACHARY N. SOMERS, MINORITY COUNSEL WILL HUPMAN, LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT FOR CONGRESSMAN FORBES 3 For MR. ROVE: ROBERT D. LUSKIN, ESQ. KATIE BIBER, ESQ. Patton Boggs LLP Attorneys at Law 2550 M Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20037-1350 For FORMER PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY: EMMET T. FLOOD, ESQ. Attorney at Law Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005 For WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL'S OFFICE: JASON GREEN, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL CHRIS WEIDEMAN, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL BLAKE ROBERTS, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL For JUSTICE DEPARTMENT: 4 JOHN R. TYLER, CIVIL DIVISION 5 Mr. Schiff. We are here this morning for a transcribed interview of former White House official Karl Rove, pursuant to the March 4th, 2009 Agreement of Accommodation between the House Judiciary Committee and the former Bush administration. Mr. Rove, please state your full name and address for the record.
    [Show full text]