Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 157 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MAY 9, 2011 No. 62 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 10, 2011, at 12 noon. Senate MONDAY, MAY 9, 2011 The Senate met at 2 p.m. and was Connecticut, to perform the duties of the ator John Ensign of Nevada. The cer- called to order by the Honorable RICH- Chair. tificate, the Chair is advised, is in the ARD BLUMENTHAL, a Senator from the DANIEL K. INOUYE, form suggested by the Senate. State of Connecticut. President pro tempore. If there be no objection, the reading Mr. BLUMENTHAL thereupon as- of the certificate will be waived and it PRAYER sumed the chair as Acting President will be printed in full in the RECORD. The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- pro tempore. There being no objection, the mate- fered the following prayer: f rial was ordered to be printed in the Let us pray. RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY RECORD, as follows: Merciful God, take possession of our LEADER STATE OF NEVADA hearts so that we will do Your will. Use The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- Executive Department us for Your glory as beacons of light pore. The majority leader is recog- CERTIFICATE OF APPOINTMENT and inspiration in our Nation and nized. world. We desire for Your name to re- To the President of the Senate of the United ceive the honor it is due. -
Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc. -
An Investigation of Allegations of Politicized Hiring by Monica Goodling and Other Staff in the Office of the Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice An Investigation of Allegations of Politicized Hiring by Monica Goodling and Other Staff in the Office of the Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility Office of the Inspector General July 28, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................ i CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION................................................................. 1 I. Scope of the Investigation.................................................................. 1 II. Methodology of the Investigation ....................................................... 2 III. Organization of this Report ............................................................... 3 CHAPTER TWO BACKGROUND.................................................................. 5 I. Monica Goodling ............................................................................... 5 II. Kyle Sampson ................................................................................... 6 III. Susan Richmond and Jan Williams................................................... 7 IV. Department Components and Personnel ........................................... 7 V. Hiring Standards ............................................................................ 11 A. Department Career and Political Attorney Positions ............... 11 B. Legal Standards..................................................................... 12 CHAPTER THREE GOODLING’S ROLE -
Table of Contents
Table of Contents 1. Defense Travel System (DTS) – #4373 2. DOD Travel Payments Improper Payment Measure – #4372 3. Follow up Amendment 4. DOD Earmarks Cost and Grading Amendment – #4370 5. Limitation on DoD Contract Performance Bonuses – #4371 1. Amendment # 4373 – No Federal funds for the future development and operation of the Defense Travel System Background The Defense Travel System (DTS) is an end-to-end electronic travel system intended to integrate all travel functions, from authorization through ticket purchase to accounting for the Department of Defense. The system was initiated in 1998 and it was supposed to be fully deployed by 2002. DTS is currently in the final phase of a six-year contract that expires September 30, 2006. In its entire history, the system has never met a deadline, never stayed within cost estimates, and never performed adequately. To date, DTS has cost the taxpayers $474 million – more than $200 million more than it was originally projected to cost. It is still not fully deployed. It is grossly underutilized. And tests have repeatedly shown that it does not consistently find the lowest applicable airfare – so even where it is deployed and used, it does not really achieve the savings proposed. This amendment prohibits continued funding of DTS and instead requires DOD to shift to a fixed price per transaction e-travel system used by government agencies in the civilian sector, as set up under General Services Administration (GSA) contracts. Quotes of Senators from last year’s debate • Senator Allen stated during the debate last year that “as a practical matter we would like to have another year or so to see (DTS) fully implemented.” • Senator Coleman stated during the debate, “… if we cannot get the right answers we should pull the plug, but now is not the time to pull the plug. -
\\Crewserver05\Data\Research & Investigations\Most Ethical Public
Stephen Abraham Exhibits EXHIBIT 1 Unlikely Adversary Arises to Criticize Detainee Hearings - New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/23/us/23gitmo.html?pagewanted=print July 23, 2007 Unlikely Adversary Arises to Criticize Detainee Hearings By WILLIAM GLABERSON NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. — Stephen E. Abraham’s assignment to the Pentagon unit that runs the hearings at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, seemed a perfect fit. A lawyer in civilian life, he had been decorated for counterespionage and counterterrorism work during 22 years as a reserve Army intelligence officer in which he rose to the rank of lieutenant colonel. His posting, just as the Guantánamo hearings were accelerating in 2004, gave him a close-up view of the government’s detention policies. It also turned him into one of the Bush administration’s most unlikely adversaries. In June, Colonel Abraham became the first military insider to criticize publicly the Guantánamo hearings, which determine whether detainees should be held indefinitely as enemy combatants. Just days after detainees’ lawyers submitted an affidavit containing his criticisms, the United States Supreme Court reversed itself and agreed to hear an appeal arguing that the hearings are unjust and that detainees have a right to contest their detentions in federal court. Some lawyers say Colonel Abraham’s account — of a hearing procedure that he described as deeply flawed and largely a tool for commanders to rubber-stamp decisions they had already made — may have played an important role in the justices’ highly unusual reversal. That decision once again brought the administration face to face with the vexing legal, political and diplomatic questions about the fate of Guantánamo and the roughly 360 men still held there. -
N Ieman Reports
NIEMAN REPORTS Nieman Reports One Francis Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 Nieman Reports THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 21 ST CENTURY MUCKRAKERS THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION HARVARDAT UNIVERSITY 21st Century Muckrakers Who Are They? How Do They Do Their Work? Words & Reflections: Secrets, Sources and Silencing Watchdogs Journalism 2.0 End Note went to the Carnegie Endowment in New York but of the Oakland Tribune, and Maynard was throw- found times to return to Cambridge—like many, ing out questions fast and furiously about my civil I had “withdrawal symptoms” after my Harvard rights coverage. I realized my interview was lasting ‘to promote and elevate the year—and would meet with Tenney. She came to longer than most, and I wondered, “Is he trying to my wedding in Toronto in 1984, and we tried to knock me out of competition?” Then I happened to keep in touch regularly. Several of our class, Peggy glance over at Tenney and got the only smile from standards of journalism’ Simpson, Peggy Engel, Kat Harting, and Nancy the group—and a warm, welcoming one it was. I Day visited Tenney in her assisted living facility felt calmer. Finally, when the interview ended, I in Cambridge some years ago, during a Nieman am happy to say, Maynard leaped out of his chair reunion. She cared little about her own problems and hugged me. Agnes Wahl Nieman and was always interested in others. Curator Jim Tenney was a unique woman, and I thoroughly Thomson was the public and intellectual face of enjoyed her friendship. -
Slate.Com Table of Contents Explainer Can You Be a Gay Mormon?
Slate.com Table of Contents explainer Can You Be a Gay Mormon? fighting words Advanced Search Fidel Gets Religion architecture foreigners For Sale: 200,000-Square-Foot Box Still Waiting for Chinese Democracy books foreigners How To Read the Quran War of Words books gabfest The Dark Matter of Our Cherished Document The Quaker Meeting Gabfest corrections gaming Corrections Wii Will Rock You! culture gabfest hey, wait a minute The Culture Gabfest, Identity Crisis Edition Only in America? culturebox hot document I Vant To Upend Your Expectations CBS's Dream Team culturebox human nature The J. Crew Catalog Destroyed My Spirit Children of the Clones dear prudence human nature The Devil, They Say Drone Ask, Drone Tell drink jurisprudence What To Drink on Thanksgiving I Beg Your Pardon dvd extras low concept Buster Keaton's The General Dear President Obama explainer moneybox Explainer's Wildfire Roundup Harvard's Investment Errors explainer moneybox The Globavore's Dilemma The Subprime Good Guys explainer movies Explainer's Same-Sex-Marriage Roundup Twilight explainer music box The Evergold State Welcome to the Jumble explainer other magazines Explainer's Pirate Roundup America's Checkup explainer other magazines Measuring the National Carbon Footprint The Redprint explainer poem Behold the Power of Michelle "Omaha Beach" explainer politics The Millionaire Arsonist Dingell Buried Copyright 2007 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive Co. LLC 1/85 politics the undercover economist Obama's White House, Clinton's Team Only the Good Buy Young politics -
The GOP AFTER the BIG ELEPHANTS, WHAT?
RIPON New Monthly Format FEBRUARY, 1978 VOL. XIV, No.2 50 cents Conunenlary: The GOP AFTER THE BIG ELEPHANTS, WHAT? In Michigan, the political fate from a shortage of intestinal fortitude. of the Republican Party rests on Gov. Clark and fellow Sen. John Culver (D) , William Mi11iken(R). In Iowa, it after all, have the most liberal voting rests on Gov. RObert Ray. In Maine, records in the country, according to on U.S.Rep. William Cohen. The three Americans for Democratic Action. And men are merely the most prominent Clark only last year began to pay as symbols of the GOP's "Big Elephant" siduous attention to constituent con problem. ems after years of neglect. Clark's "unbeatable" reputation hardly seems The symptoms are not apparent to square with his record: one win in in every state, but they are wide one try. But Clark knocked of incum spread enough to be of national con bent Sen. Jack Mi11er(R) in the "Repub cern. Milliken, Ray, and Cohen are lican year" of 1972 so he looks more all phenomenally popular vote-getters. scary than his liberal record in a As a result, the "Republican Parties moderate-conservative state might oth in their respective states tends to erwise indicate. revolve around their decisions. All three were their partie~ best hopes to run for either the Senate or gov ernorship this year. In Milliken's and Ray's cases, when they opted not to seek a new legislative career in Washington, their parties searched frantically for alternative candi dates. In Iowa, that search was parti cularly frustrating. -
Rethinking the Identity and Role of United States Attorneys
Rethinking the Identity and Role of United States Attorneys Sara Sun Beale* The reputation and credibility of the Department of Justice were badly tarnished during the Bush administration. This article focuses on concerns regarding the role of partisan politics.1 Critics charge that during the Bush administration improper partisan political considerations pervasively influenced a wide range of decisions including the selection of immigration judges, summer interns and line attorneys; the assignment of career attorneys to particular details; the evaluation of the performance of United States Attorneys; and the decision whether and when to file charges in cases with political ramifications. The Inspector General’s lengthy and highly critical reports have substantiated some of these charges.2 The first two Inspector General (IG) Reports found that the Department improperly used political criteria in hiring and assigning some immigration judges, interns, and career prosecutors.3 The third report * Charles L.B. Lowndes Professor, Duke Law School, Durham, N.C. I would like to acknowledge the outstanding research assistance provided by Michael Devlin, Meghan Ferguson, Amy Taylor, and Molly Brownfield, and the helpful comments of Norman Abrams, Albert Alschuler, Rachel Barkow, Anthony Barkow, Candace Carroll, Colm Connolly, Ronald Goldstock, Bruce Green, Lisa Kern Griffin, James Jacobs, Susan Klein, Daniel Richman, and Adam Safwat. Of course any errors are my own. 1 Other serious concerns about the Department have been raised, particularly in connection with its role in the war on terror. For example, the Department has been the subject of intense criticism for legal analysis that led to the authorization of brutal interrogation techniques for detainees. -
Depoliticizing the Interim Appointments of US Attorneys
LIVE AND LEARN: DEPOLITICIZING THE INTERIM APPOINTMENTS OF U.S. ATTORNEYS t Laurie L. Levenson The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done.' I. INTRODUCTION U.S. Attorneys play a special role in our federal criminal justice system. As the representatives of the federal government, they have the responsibility of enforcing federal laws in their respective districts.2 3 Although U.S. Attorneys serve "at the pleasure of the President," the4 goal is to have a fair and impartial prosecutor administering the laws. The recent firing of eight U.S. Attorneys has called into question at- tempts to politicize the role of this vital Office. By attempting to give the Attorney General the power to make indefinite interim appointments, I Professor of Law, William M. Rains Fellow & Director, Center for Ethical Advocacy, Loyola Law School. Thank you to John McKay, a man of true integrity, for inviting me to participate in the Symposium at Seattle University School of Law. His courage, as well as that of his fellow U.S. Attorneys, Paul Carlton, David Iglesias, Bill Cummins III, and Carol Lam, should serve as an inspi- ration for others dedicated to public service. I also wish to extend my gratitude to the editors of the Seattle University Law Review and to my wonderful research assistants, Emil Petrossian, Lindsay Meurs, William Smyth, and Mary Gordon. -
Missouri House of Representatives
STATE REPRESENTATIVES 147 Missouri House of Representatives CATHERINE HANAWAY ROD JETTON House of Representatives Officers Speaker, Missouri House of Speaker Pro Tem, Missouri Representatives House of Representatives Catherine Hanaway, Speaker Rod Jetton, Speaker Pro Tem Jason Crowell, Majority Floor Leader Mark Wright, Assistant Majority Floor Leader Chuck Portwood, Majority Caucus Chair Annie Reinhart, Majority Caucus Secretary Chuck Purgason, Majority Whip Mark Abel, Minority Floor Leader Bill Ransdall, Assistant Minority Floor Leader Russ Carnahan, Minority Caucus Chair Terry Young, Minority Caucus Secretary Rick Johnson, Minority Whip Stephen S. Davis, Chief Clerk JASON CROWELL MARK ABEL Ralph Robinett, Sergeant-at-Arms Majority Floor Leader Minority Floor Leader Missouri House of Missouri House of Father David Buescher, Chaplain Representatives Representatives Rev. James Earl Jackson, Chaplain Goodman; Liese; Lipke; Luetkemeyer; Muckler; Committees of the House 2003 Salva; Smith (118); Spreng; Sutherland; Villa; Administration and Accounts: Miller, chair; Yates; Young Morris, vice chair; Behnen; Cooper (120); Appropriations–Health, Mental Health and Cunningham (145); Davis (122); Hampton; Social Services: Purgason, chair; Holand, vice Haywood; McKenna; Reinhart; Richard; Salva; chair; Bean; Brooks; Campbell; Cooper (155); Sander; Wagner Curls; Donnelly; El-Amin; Johnson (61); May; Agriculture: Myers, chair; Sander, vice chair; Page; Phillips; Portwood; Reinhart; Schaaf; Barnitz; Bean; Black; Bringer; Davis (122); Skaggs; Stefanick; -
Reining in the Imperial Presidency
REINING IN THE IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY VerDate Nov 24 2008 23:13 Apr 07, 2009 Jkt 048026 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\HR\OC\G026A.XXX G026A hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING with PROD1PC76 on hsrobinson VerDate Nov 24 2008 23:13 Apr 07, 2009 Jkt 048026 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\HR\OC\G026A.XXX G026A hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING Reining in the Imperial Presidency: Lessons and Recommendations Relating to the Presidency of George W. Bush C O N T E N T S Page Foreword ................................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 9 Preface: Deconstructing the Imperial Presidency ...................................... 17 I. The September 25, 2001 War Powers Memorandum .................................... 20 II. Critique of John Yoo’s Flawed Theory of Presidential Supremacy .............. 25 III. The Need for a Judiciary Committee Staff Report ........................................ 32 Section 1—Politicization of the Department of Justice ............................. 33 I. Politicization of the Prosecution Function ...................................................... 35 A. Hiring and Firing of U.S. Attorneys and other Department Personnel ......................................................................................... 35 B. Selective Prosecution ............................................................................ 42 II. Politicization