Salford City Archive Service
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Electoral Review of Salford City Council
Electoral review of Salford City Council Response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s consultation on Warding Patterns August 2018 1 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Salford in 2018 has changed dramatically since the city’s previous electoral review of 2002. Salford has seen a turnaround in its fortunes over recent years, reversing decades of population decline and securing high levels of investment. The city is now delivering high levels of growth, in both new housing and new jobs, and is helping to drive forward both Salford’s and the Greater Manchester economies. 1.2 The election of the Greater Manchester Mayor and increased devolution of responsibilities to Greater Manchester, and the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, is fundamentally changing the way Salford City Council works in areas of economic development, transport, work and skills, planning, policing and more recently health and social care. 1.3 Salford’s directly elected City Mayor has galvanised the city around eight core priorities – the Great Eight. Delivering against these core priorities will require the sustained commitment and partnership between councillors, partners in the private, public, community and voluntary and social enterprise sectors, and the city’s residents. This is even more the case in the light of ongoing national policy changes, the impending departure of the UK from the EU, and continued austerity in funding for vital local services. The city’s councillors will have an absolutely central role in delivering against these core priorities, working with all our partners and residents to harness the energies and talents of all of the city. -
Trafford Park Masterplan Baseline Assessment
Trafford Park Masterplan Baseline Assessment A Report for the Trafford Economic Alliance By EKOS, CBRE, URBED and WSP August 2008 EKOS Consulting (UK) Ltd 2 Mount Street Manchester M2 5WQ TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES............................................................................................ 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 12 2 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY CONTEXT ..................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 STUDY CONTEXT.................................................................................................................... 23 HISTORICAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................ 24 STUDY CONTEXT AND MASTERPLAN OBJECTIVES .................................................................... 29 STUDY AREA.......................................................................................................................... 31 BASELINE REPORT OBJECTIVES AND STRUCTURE.................................................................... 31 3 REGENERATION AND PLANNING POLICY REVIEW.................................................. 33 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 33 NATIONAL POLICY -
Ofsted Report December 2014
School report Cheadle Hulme High School Woods Lane, Cheadle Hulme, Cheadle, Cheshire, SK8 7JY Inspection dates 10–11 December 2014 Previous inspection: Not previously inspected as an academy Overall effectiveness This inspection: Outstanding 1 Leadership and management Outstanding 1 Behaviour and safety of pupils Outstanding 1 Quality of teaching Outstanding 1 Achievement of pupils Outstanding 1 Sixth form provision Outstanding 1 Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is an outstanding school. Cheadle Hulme High School provides an excellent Students’ behaviour is faultless throughout all year and rounded education for all of its students, groups. They are courteous and respectful to all regardless of their individual backgrounds, staff and mutual respect abounds. preparing them well for their future careers. Procedures to monitor both the quality of learning In Key Stages 3 and 4, students make outstanding and teaching, as well as the progress of individuals, progress in each year group. They leave Year 11 are exacting and exemplary. with standards in GCSE examinations that are well Teachers know their subjects and students above those found nationally. extremely well. Students feed off their teachers’ A higher proportion of most able students achieve expertise, making secure gains in their knowledge GCSE grades A* and A than found nationally. and understanding of any topics being discussed. All groups of students, including those with an Marking is regular and helps students to make the identified special educational need and those from impressive learning gains that result in high a disadvantaged background make the same standards. However, a few teachers have not fully outstanding progress as their peers. -
Pdf Copy of the Report
City of Manchester Plan 1945, abridged edition This report has been digitised by Joe Blakey and Martin Dodge from the Department of Geography, University of Manchester. The digitisation was supported by the Manchester Statistical Society’s Campion Fund. The copy of the report digitised kindly provided by Richard Brook, Manchester School of Architecture. Permission to digitise and release the report under Creative Commons license was kindly granted by Manchester Libraries, Information and Archives, Manchester City Council. (Email: [email protected]) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 20 July 2013. C O NTENTS PR A .. page 2 I. TH D · I N 3 The Purpose of Pla nning- The Pla n in Outline-Ways and Mean II . H F UN I ATION 7 Basic Surveys-Popula tion- The Fa mily Unit J II . II • RAM WORK 10 The Z ning Scheme- Indu trial Planning- Highways JV. T H STR TUR 16 Design fo r Li ving- Ho mes- Types of Dwelling - l ndoor Space- Outdoor Space- School - The eighbo urhood- The District Y. R H SJN 28 Density- The Overspi ll Pro blem- The Redevelopment Programme- The Satellite VJ. 36 Sy tem- Ri vers- A mokeless ity- District H eating YJL. T li E R , IONAL A PJT L 40 Learning, Med icine a nd Lhe rts-The ity Centre-Transport- C ivic Building V LJL. T I-l - OND IT IONS 0 u ss 51 Fu rther Legisla ti o n- Loca l Government- T he Prospect Th e author\· acknowl dgment and thanks ore due to MR. -
Commissioning Across Government: Review of Evidence
T hird Sector Research Centre Research Report (86) Commissioning across government: review of evidence Tony Bovaird, Helen Dickinson and Kerry Allen August 2012 Project for National Audit Office Revised version of Final Report (submitted 17 May 2010) Research Report Report Research ( 86 ) August 2012 2012 August Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Approach and methods ........................................................................................................................ 6 Scoping phase ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Scanning and analysing the literature ..................................................................................................... 6 Updating government commissioning models......................................................................................... 7 What is commissioning? ...................................................................................................................... 8 Lack of agreed definition ......................................................................................................................... 8 Drivers of interest in commissioning ........................................................................................................ 8 Definitions of commissioning ................................................................................................................ -
Revised Redacted Report Lynton Road Lowry Drive 111218 PDF 326 KB
Part 1 - Open to the Public ITEM NO. REPORT OF THE STRATEGIC DIRECTOR PLACE TO LEAD MEMBER FOR PLANNING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT LEAD MEMBER BRIEFING 11 th December 2018 TITLE: City of Salford (Lynton Road, Lowry Drive and Station Road, Pendlebury) (Prohibition and Restriction of Waiting and Amendment) Order 2018 RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Lead Member for Planning and Sustainable Development consider contents of this report and the deliberations of the Traffic Advisory Panel and make a decision to: 1. Overrule the objections in respect Lynton Road and Station Road. 2. Accede to the objections in part in respect of Lowry Drive. 3. Approve the modified proposals for Lowry Drive at the junction with Station Road set out in this report. 4. Authorise the making of the Traffic Regulation Order in modified form set out in Appendix 6 and 7 hereto. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request has been made to the Swinton & Pendlebury Highways Task Group for a relaxation on the waiting restrictions on Lynton Road and new waiting restrictions on Lowry Drive at the junction with Station Road in Salford. A traffic management scheme has been designed to remove some existing double yellow lines and introduce a ‘No Waiting’ Monday to Friday 9 am – 4 pm on Lynton Road. A scheme has also been designed to introduce ‘No Waiting at Any Time’ Traffic Regulation Order on Lowry Drive to cover the extents considered appropriate by the Highways Task Group as indicated on the attached Appendix 1 and 2. Page 1 of 20 The Traffic Regulation Order to introduce ‘No Waiting’ and ‘No Waiting at Any Time’ restrictions was legally advertised on 16 th August 2018 for 21 days, during that time one objection has been received in connection to the proposal for Lynton Road. -
A666 Manchester Road
Part 1 - Open to the Public REPORT OF THE STRATEGIC DIRECTOR PLACE TO THE LEAD MEMBER FOR PLANNING & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC ADVISORY PANEL 13th June 2019 TITLE: Salford Bolton Network Improvement Programme (SBNI - DP3) City of Salford (A666 Manchester Road - A666 Bolton Road Area, Salford) (Bus Lane, Prohibition of Waiting, Loading – Unloading Restriction and Mandatory Cycle Lane) (Traffic Regulation Order) 2019 RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Lead Member for Planning & Sustainable Development consider the contents of this report and the deliberations of the Traffic Advisory Panel and makes a decision to approve the amended proposals as detailed in this report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) in conjunction with Salford City Council has developed a series of measures across the Salford and Bolton Network Improvement (SBNI) area to make the transport network more efficient. It aims to make travel easier for everyone, including public transport users, pedestrians, cyclists and drivers. Bus passengers in particular will see quicker, more reliable journey times. The improvements will also help encourage economic growth by providing better access to local town centres, employment opportunities, health, education, retail and leisure facilities. Funding for the improvements has been supported by Central Government through the Greater Manchester Local Growth Deal. A scheme within this programme has been identified for the A666 corridor, including Manchester Road, Clifton and Bolton Road, Pendlebury. 1 The scheme seeks to introduce improved bus reliability by the provision of Regional Centre bound bus lanes, improved bus stop provision, improved cycle facilities as well as upgraded pedestrian crossing facilities. As part of this scheme a suite of Traffic Regulation Orders are proposed including the Bus Lanes as well as the complementary waiting and loading restrictions that are required to ensure that the improvements fully realise the anticipated benefits for buses, general traffic as well as cyclists and pedestrians. -
N SA Appendix 3 Details of Baseline Information
Publication Salford Local Plan: Development Management and Allocations Document Sustainability Appraisal Appendix 3 Details of Baseline Information APPENDIX 3 Details of Baseline Information Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 2 2 Social .................................................................................................................. 3 2A Population .............................................................................................................. 3 2B Health ..................................................................................................................... 7 2C Crime ................................................................................................................... 10 2D Accessibility .......................................................................................................... 11 2E Housing ................................................................................................................ 15 2F Education ............................................................................................................. 21 3. Economic .......................................................................................................... 25 3A Economic health ................................................................................................... 25 3B Structure of the economy .................................................................................... -
De Trafford LOCATION: Navigation House, 1 Furness Quay, Salford, M50 3XZ PROPOSAL
APPLICATION No: 17/69345/FUL APPLICANT: De Trafford LOCATION: Navigation House, 1 Furness Quay, Salford, M50 3XZ PROPOSAL: Demolition of office building and construction of residential development comprising 421 apartments (C3), 408 sqm of ground floor commercial space (A1, A2, A3, A4, B1, D2) across buildings ranging from 6 to 27 storeys, along with associated access and landscaping works. WARD: Ordsall Description of Site and Surrounding Area This application relates to an approximately 0.5ha site located within Salford Quays, off Furness Quay. The site is occupied by Navigation House which is a 3 storey office building with a pitched roof that stands on the southern part of the site, fronting The Quays road. The remainder of the site, although subdivided into two parcels of land, is in the main hard surfaced and used for car parking. There are landscaped areas with tree planting around the perimeter of the site, with some landscaped areas within the car parks. The site is relatively flat, but is on higher ground than the site to the north and the site rises up to meet The Quays road. All the buildings immediately adjacent to this development are accessed from Furness Quay. This includes the Dock Office and Ontario House, to the east and south east, and to the northwest is Custom and Furness House and the northeast Northern House and Parkside Court. The Dock Office has been redeveloped into apartments and Custom and Furness House have recently been granted planning consent for the redevelopment of the buildings and the wider site for residential use, this is known as the Fortis Quay scheme. -
Walter Bluer (1897 – 1938)
Walter Bluer (1897 – 1938) Walter Bluer was born in April 1897 in Pendlebury in Lancashire. His parents were Alfred Bluer (1864 – 1943) and Mary CartwriGht (1868 – 1902). On the 1901 census, at the age of three, he was livinG with his parents at 7 Ramsden Fold, Clifton, Pendlebury. His mother, Mary died in 1902 at the age of 33. On the 1911 Census, Walter aged 14 was already workinG at a local Pendlebury mine as a hand putter, which is ‘a person who pushes wagons’. This was physically challenGinG work. Around the late 1920s the mines around Pendlebury were facinG the same fate as the Black Country mines in the 1880s; they were closinG down. This was not only because the mines were becominG exhausted, but also the Great Depression was beGinninG. Walter was clearly in need of work and made the decision to move to Staveley. He moved from Pendlebury with his cousin, Herbert Bluer, who was also born in 1897. Walter married Lily Hickman on 8 November 1930 in Staveley. A cousin of Lily’s, Nellie Hickman (1903 – 1985), had married John Arnold Bray (1904 – 1938) in 1928. John Arnold Bray was also killed in the Markham Colliery disaster of 1938. Nellie’s older brother was Joseph Henry Hickman (1894 – 1954) who married Eveline Fanny James. She was the widow of Wilfred Haywood (1902 – 1938) who was also killed in the 1938 Markham Colliery disaster. In 1931 Walter and Lily had a dauGhter, Dorothy M Bluer (1931 - ). Walter was killed on the 5 May 1938 at Markham Colliery, alonG with 78 other men. -
Record of Decision
Decisions taken by the Property / Regeneration Briefing on Monday, 22 June 2020 Agenda Topic Decision Item No Part A – Items considered in public A4 Highways Investment Programme 2020/21 Salford City Council - Record of Decision I Paul Dennett, City Mayor, in exercise of the powers contained within the City Council constitution do hereby: Approve the proposed programmes of work for the Highways Investment Programme (HIP) for 2020/21 The Reasons are: To facilitate continuous improvement of the highway infrastructure as part of the defined Network Recovery Plan as part of the ongoing rolling programme of repair works Options considered and rejected were: No other options were considered for this report. Assessment of Risk: Low – The targeted spend of available funding will ensure that the City Council’s statutory obligations are met while at the same time facilitating continuous improvement of the highway infrastructure. The source of funding is: Prudential Code funding (Capital) Legal Advice obtained: Tony Hatton Principal Solicitor 219 6323 Financial Advice obtained: Alison Woods Finance Officer Capital 0161 925 1135 Salford City Council – Decisions taken by the Property / Regeneration Briefing on Monday, 22 June 2020 Agenda Topic Decision Item No Procurement Advice obtained Tom Woods Procurement Officer 0161 686 6296 The following documents have been used to assist the decision process. Report to Property/Regeneration Briefing held on 22 June 2020 Contact Officer: Steve Mangan Tel No 0161 603 4034 The appropriate scrutiny panels to call-in the decision are the Overview and Scrutiny Board and the Growth and Prosperity Scrutiny Panel______________________ Signed: Paul Dennett City Mayor Dated: 22 June 2020 This decision was published o n Monday 22 June 2020 This decision will come in force at 4.00 p.m. -
Organisation Forename Surname Job Title Region Herefordshire County
Organisation Forename Surname Job Title Region Herefordshire County Council Rachel Andrews Organisational Development and Recruitment AdviserMidlands Wales Fenland District Council Sam Anthony Head of HR & OD South East (Inc London) Gedling Borough Council David Archer Service Manager - Organisational Development Midlands Wales Lincolnshire County Council Deborah Arrand HR Business Partner Midlands Wales Rochdale Borough Council Rosemary Barker TBC North Warwickshire County Council Dawn Barr Manager of OD Midlands Wales North Yorkshire Council Sarah Barron Senior HR Advisor North Sheffield City Council Mark Bennett Director of HR & Customer Services Midlands Wales Tameside Borough Council Tracy Berennand TBC North Manchester City Council Steven berry HROD Specialist (One to Watch Winner) North Financial Ombudsman Service Hannah Bornet Wellbeing Manager South East (Inc London) London Borough of Redbridge Andrea Bradley Human Resources Business Partner South East (Inc London) Cornwall Council Anne Branett Service Lead : Organisation & Workforce DevelopmentSouth West Leeds City Council Emma Browes HR Service Manager North Thurrock Council Andrew Brown Strategic Lead - Pay & Operations South East (Inc London) Fermanagh & Omagh District Council Themla Browne Head of HR & OD North Herefordshire County Council Lucy Campion Learning & OD Advisor Midlands Wales Onesource Hayley Camporese PPMA Rising Star Winner South East (Inc London) Essex County Council Alex Carlton Head of People Insight and Technology South East (Inc London) Lincolnshire County