DOCSLIB.ORG

Norman O. Brown Papers, 1938-2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Norman O. Brown Papers, 1938-2002 http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt6m3nd4kj No online items Guide to the Norman O. Brown Papers, 1938-2002 Processed by the UCSC OAC Unit The University Library Special Collections and Archives University Library University of California, Santa Cruz Santa Cruz, California, 95064 Email: [email protected] URL: http://library.ucsc.edu/speccoll/ © 2006 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Guide to the Norman O. Brown MS 35 1 Papers, 1938-2002 Guide to the Norman O. Brown Papers, 1938-2002 Collection number: MS 35 The University Library Special Collections and Archives University of California, Santa Cruz Santa Cruz, California Contact Information: Special Collections and Archives University Library University of California, Santa Cruz Santa Cruz, California, 95064 Email: [email protected] URL: http://library.ucsc.edu/speccoll/ Processed by: Mathew E. Simpson Date Completed: May 2007. Updated September & October 2012. Encoded by: Mathew E. Simpson © 2006 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Norman O. Brown Papers Dates: 1938-2002 Bulk Dates: (Bulk 1968-1990) Collection number: MS 35 Creator: Brown, Norman Oliver Collection Size: 73 boxes Repository: University of California, Santa Cruz. University Library. Special Collections and Archives Santa Cruz, California 95064 Abstract: This collection contains personal, family and business correspondence (mostly incoming) and documents covering the years from Norman O. Brown's arrival in the United States in 1936, to his death in 2002. The bulk of the material covers the time he was affiliated with the University of California at Santa Cruz, as professor and emeritus, ca. 1970-1990. Also included are his working files, card files, teaching related materials, articles and essays used for reference material. Physical location: Stored in Special Collections & Archives: Advance notice is required for access to the papers. Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English , French , German , Greek, Ancient (to 1453) , and Latin Access Collection is open for research. Publication Rights Property rights reside with the University of California. Literary rights are retained by the creators of the records and their heirs. For permission to publish or to reproduce the material, please contact the Head of Special Collections & Archives. Preferred Citation Norman O. Brown Papers. MS 35. Special Collections and Archives, University Library, University of California, Santa Cruz. Acquisition Information Gift of the Brown family, 2004-2006. Additional material via Jerry Neu added in 2012. Biography Guide to the Norman O. Brown MS 35 2 Papers, 1938-2002 Norman Oliver Brown (1913-2002) was born in El Oro de Hidalgo, Mexico, and raised in England, where he took his B.A. at Balliol College, Oxford, with double First Class Honors in the School of Literae Humaniores (Classical Philology and History). He then came to the United States and continued his studies at the University of Chicago, where he met and married Elizabeth Potter in 1938. His doctorate in classics was earned at the University of Wisconsin (1942) with a dissertation that he subsequently published as Hermes the Thief, which remains a classic of social interpretation of the history of religion. After a year of teaching at Nebraska Wesleyan University, he spent the remaining war years in Washington D.C. as a research analyst with the Office of Strategic Services, working alongside men who would become life-long friends, including Herbert Marcuse and Carl Schorske. There followed a decade and a half at Wesleyan University in Connecticut, where he eventually chaired the Classics Department. In 1968, Brown came to Santa Cruz with the appropriate title of Professor of Humanities, after a briefer period at the University of Rochester as professor of classics and comparative literature. He held senior fellowships from the Ford and Guggenheim Foundations and from the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford Norman O. Brown (known as "Nobby" to virtually all who knew him) made his mark in the field of classics not only with Hermes but with an edition of Hesiod's Theogony and memorable interpretive essays on Pindar, on the birth of Athena, and on Daphne. But no customary academic label can encompass the scope of his scholarship, creativity, and profound influence on his students and on the reading public. To suggest something of his quality we extract sentences written to characterize him by other leaders of the contemporary intellectual world. "Brown is a most unusual scholar, whose intellectual power is such as to have burst the bonds of traditional discursive thought and to have found its proper form in a metaphoric language often closer to poetry than to prose." "Brown's scholarship, his superb technical equipment, has been used to probe toward the very roots of meaning and organization of culture." "His unique perspective on matters cultural brings all of our shopworn pieties under doubt." "He is a wayward, sometimes obscure and perverse, at other times brilliant and penetrating, always poetical and even rhapsodic writer, whose uniqueness is unquestionable ... a true original and unusual phenomenon among academics and ... to be greatly cherished." It was in the early 1950's that Professor Brown found the key to a new vision in the writings of Sigmund Freud. Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytic Meaning of History (1959) brought this vision to a large public in America, and, through numerous translations, in Europe and Japan. A revolutionary generation of college youth imbibed from it a heady spirit of inner revolution; in retrospect the book remains one of the most important essays relating psychoanalysis to cultural history. Love's Body (1966), a more difficult meal for the scholarly world to digest, dealt aphoristically with central issues of archetypal symbolism. Closing Time (1973) evoked a vision of the historical process in the guise of a gloss upon the writings of James Joyce and Giambattista Vico. Professor Brown was never tame or safely academic; his polymorphous Orphic or Blakeian vision challenges the rational orderliness of the scholarly world, which often disagreed with him, even vehemently, but respected and honored him in disagreement. At UC Santa Cruz this prophetic figure was a solid and uncommonly responsible citizen of Cowell College, where he served on the governing committee and in other important capacities, and on the Academic Senate. In the latter capacity, he contributed loyally to two of its most important and hard-working committees. He was a central member of the Committee for the History of Consciousness Program, and also taught for the Boards of Studies of Literature and History, and for Cowell College. Throughout his career, and indeed on into retirement, he published essays and articles in a variety of journals and books. Professor Brown officially retired from UCSC in June of 1981, but continued to occasionally teach and offer public lectures, including a series of lectures on "The Challenge of Islam" that he gave both at Oakes College at UCSC and at Tufts University in Massachusetts. In his quest across disciplinary boundaries for the roots of human meaning, in his championship of "life against death" in a world that puts life-giving meaning in jeopardy, in his daring individuality of thought and wide-ranging compass of concern, Professor Brown represented in his person and works an important aspect of what the University community in Santa Cruz would like to regard as its distinctive strength. In 1985 a second addition of Life Against Death was published by Wesleyan University Press, with an added introduction by Christopher Lasch. In 1991 the University of California Press brought out Apocalypse and/or Metamorphosis, a collection of his writings spanning 30 years. Norman O. Brown died at age 89 in Santa Cruz on October 2, 2002 after an extended period of declining health. A memorial was held two weeks later. Many of the reminiscences given that day were published in In Memoriam: Norman O. Brown by New Pacific Press, 2005. (Some of this text was culled from the program notes for NOB's Faculty Research Lecture given at UCSC in 1978.) Scope and Content of Collection This collection contains personal, family and business correspondence (mostly incoming), and documents covering the years from Norman O. Brown's arrival in the United States in 1936 from England, to his death in 2002. The bulk of the Guide to the Norman O. Brown MS 35 3 Papers, 1938-2002 material covers the time he was affiliated with the University of California at Santa Cruz, as professor and emeritus, ca. 1970-1990. Also included are his working files, card files, teaching related materials, articles and essays used for reference material. Arrangement The personal and family correspondence has been arranged by name, while business correspondence has been arranged chronologically. The working and card files have been left as close to their original order as possible. Teaching related material has been sorted chronologically. Indexing Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the library's online public access catalog. Subjects Brown, Norman Oliver, 1913-2002 Civilization--Philosophy Civilization--Psychological aspects Psychoanalysis and culture Psychoanalysis and religion Related Collections Norman O. Brown Papers. Wesleyan University, Middletown, CN Herbert-Marcuse-Archive. University Library, Frankfurt am Main, Germany John Cage Collection. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL John Cage Papers, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CN Separated Material The books from Norman O. Brown's personal library have been cataloged separately. Cassettes, tapes, and videotapes have been reformatted and cataloged separately. box-folder 1:1-19 Series I. Biographical 1923-2002 Physical Description: 19 folders Scope and Content Note This series contains a few personal documents and government forms. More information can be obtained from reading the family correspondence in Boxes 2-4. Arrangement Arranged chronologically. box-folder 1:1 Childhood Essay n.d.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hayden White an Academic Teacher
    15 Hayden White an academic teacher Ewa Domańska Translated by Magdalena Zapedowska According to Jean-François Lyotard, we live in a postmodern era characterized by the collapse of “grand narratives,” associated not only with a crisis of belief in truth and a crisis of metaphysics, but also with a crisis of the university. In his Postmodern Condition, Lyotard makes much of the commercialization of knowledge, pointing out that in the post- modern era the main factors which legitimate knowledge are its effi ciency and usefulness. Th e goal of research is “not to fi nd truth, but to augment power.” Th e cognitive function of science is thus inseparable from its socio-political function. Under the control of those who manage its fi - nancial resources, the role of the university changes: it is expected to pro- duce competent researchers, not to generate ideals.¹ Many historians claim that the declared crisis of history is of an institutional or technical rather than epistemological character. Th e argu- ments they use to support this claim are similar to Lyotard’s: changes in the ways of fi nancing institutions of higher education; the reduced au- tonomy of universities, controlled by authorities that promote particu- lar kinds of research and provide funds for it; the commercialization of historical science (the heritage industry; the past as an object of trade which can be purchased and sold); the reduced number of history classes in elementary and high schools (the supposed uselessness of the humani- ties; the tendency toward specialized education);
    [Show full text]
  • Norman O. Brown, 1913–2002
    OBITUARY Norman O. Brown, 1913–2002 orman O. Brown was born in New Mexico in 1913 and educated at Balliol College, Oxford, and at the University of Wisconsin. His tutor at Oxford was NIsaiah Berlin. A product of the 1930s, Brown was active in left-wing politics – for example, in the 1948 Henry Wallace presidential campaign – and his work belongs within the history of Marxist, as well as psychoanalytic, thought. During World War II, he worked in the Office of Strategic Services, where his supervisor was Carl Schorske and his colleagues included Herbert Marcuse and Franz Neumann. Marcuse urged Brown to read Freud, leading, in 1959, to Brownʼs most memorable work, Life Against Death. Brown taught Classics at Wesleyan University and was a member of the History of Consciousness Department at the University of California at Santa Cruz. Although Life Against Death made him an icon of the New Left, he successfully eschewed publicity, insisting to the end on his primary identity as teacher. There is still no better introduction to Life Against Death than the one that Brown wrote in 1959. The book was inspired, he explained, by a felt ʻneed to reappraise the nature and destiny of manʼ. The ʻdeep study of Freudʼ was the natural means for this undertaking. His motives, Brown continued, were political in the most profound sense of the term: ʻInheriting from the Protestant tradition a conscience which insisted that intellectual work should be directed toward the relief of manʼs estate, I, like many of my generation, lived through the superannuation of the political categories which informed liberal thought and action in the 1930s.ʼ ʻThose of us who are tempera- mentally incapable of embracing the politics of sin, cynicism and despairʼ, he added, were ʻcompelled to re-examine the classic assumptions about the nature of politics and about the political character of human nature.ʼ How did it come about, at the dawn of the 1960s, that Freud appeared as the suc- cessor to a ʻsuperannuatedʼ, but not yet surpassed, Marxist project? Life Against Death addressed this question.
    [Show full text]
  • Freud and Epicurean Philosophy: Revisiting Drive Theory
    Contemporary Psychoanalysis,2014,Vol.50,No.3:395–417. C William Alanson White Institute of Psychiatry, Psychoanalysis & Psychology and ⃝ the William Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society ISSN: 0010-7530 print / 2330-9091 online DOI: 10.1080/00107530.2014.922859 JONATHAN YAHALOM, M.A. FREUD AND EPICUREAN PHILOSOPHY: REVISITING DRIVE THEORY Abstract. This article reviews Epicurean philosophy to expose Freud’s drive theory as overly quantitative and lacking a qualitative dimension. Epicurean philosophy is congruent with fundamental premises in psychoanalysis, and contributes a qualitative and quantitative theory of pleasure. Moreover, Epicurean philosophy is compatible with fundamental tenets within relational psychoanalysis, indicat- ing that drive theory is relevant—and possibly constitutive—to the relational perspective. After reviewing Epicurean philosophy, the article returns to Freud’s conceptualization of drive. Arguments are made against Freud’s hypothesis of a death drive, insofar as Freud believed that organisms are motivated by the pur- suit of pleasure in an isolated individualistic manner. The article maintains that a critical exploration of Epicureanism challenges our tendency to equate classical drive theory with material reductionism. This carries significant implications for contemporary psychoanalysis and its interpretation of the drives. Keywords: Epicurean philosophy, drive theory, pleasure principle, relational psychoanalysis Introduction Relational theorists have critiqued Freud’s drive theory, arguing that in- terpersonal factors—not intrapsychic drives—define mental life. For ex- ample, Greenberg (1991) calls for the “radical rejection of drive [theory]” because “all motivation unfolds from our personal experience of ex- change with others” (p. vii). Motivation theory certainly benefits from this Address correspondence to Jonathan Yahalom, M.A., Duquesne University, Psychol- ogy Department, 600 Forbes Avenue, 544 College Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15282.
    [Show full text]
  • Norman O. Brown Page 1
    Patterson – Norman O. Brown page 1 Norman O. Brown: A 20th Century Intellectual Odyssey “Look upon me! I'll show you the Life of the Mind!" Charlie Meadows (aka Karl "Madman" Mundt) as he sets the hotel on fire in Barton Fink It’s time for a recovery and reassessment of North American thinkers. Marshall McLuhan, Leslie Fiedler and Norman O. Brown are the linked triad I would substitute for Jacques Lacan, Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault, whose work belongs to ravaged postwar Europe and whose ideas transfer poorly into the Anglo- American tradition. McLuhan, Fiedler and Brown were steeped in literature, classical to modern. They understood the creative imagination, and they extended their insights into speculation about history and society. Their influence was positive and fruitful: They did not impose their system on acolytes but liberated a whole generation of students to think freely and to discover their own voices…. My argument is that the North American intellectuals, typified by McLuhan, Fiedler and Brown, achieved a new fusion of ideas—a sensory pragmatism or engagement with concrete experience, rooted in the body , and at the same time a visionary celebration of artistic metaspace—that is, the fictive realm of art, fantasy and belief projected by great poetry and prefiguring or own cyberspace. Camille Paglia, February 17, 2000. Patterson – Norman O. Brown page 2 Introduction The evolution of Norman O. Brown's thought seems at first glance to be completely unique. I can well imagine that librarians were puzzled about how to classify some of his books when they first appeared, and it is still anyone's guess as to where to look in a bookstore for a copy of Love's Body.
    [Show full text]
  • A Psychobiography of John Donne
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-1995 "Contraryes Meete in One": A Psychobiography of John Donne Lisa Anderson University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Anderson, Lisa, ""Contraryes Meete in One": A Psychobiography of John Donne" (1995). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Contraryes Meete In One": A Psychobiography of John Donne by Lisa Anderson Tennessee Scholars Senior Project & English Honors Thesis Project Director: Dr. Rob Stillman Second Readers: Dr. Al Burstein Dr . Jack Reese April 28, 1995 1 John Donne and his poetry have long been a tremendous source of interest for readers and scholars alike. Once more, with the development of psychoanalytic theory and its application to works of art and literature, John Donne's life and poetry have become, not surprisingly, a subject for analysis. One reason for psychoanalytic critics to be concerned with Donne is the complex nature of his poems, reflecting a struggle between dichotomous emotions influenced by the forces of sex and death. One example of Donne's poetry that displays this complex quality and illustrates the potential inherent in a psychoanalytic reading is Holy Sonnet XVII: Since she whome I lovd, hath payd her last debt To Nature, and to hers, and my good is dead And her Soule early into heaven ravished, Wholy in heavenly things my mind in sett.
    [Show full text]
  • The Incommensurability of Psychoanalysis and History
    History and Theory 51 (February 2012), 63-83 © Wesleyan University 2012 ISSN: 0018-2656 THE THIRD ANNUAL HISTORY AND THEORY LECTURE1 THE INCOMMENSURABILITY OF PSYCHOANALYSIS AND HISTORY JOAN W. SCOTT2 ABSTRACT This article argues that, although psychoanalysis and history have different conceptions of time and causality, there can be a productive relationship between them. Psychoanalysis can force historians to question their certainty about facts, narrative, and cause; it intro- duces disturbing notions about unconscious motivation and the effects of fantasy on the making of history. This was not the case with the movement for psychohistory that began in the 1970s. Then the influence of American ego-psychology on history-writing promoted the idea of compatibility between the two disciplines in ways that undercut the critical possibilities of their interaction. The work of the French historian Michel de Certeau pro- vides theoretical insight into the uses of incommensurability, while that of Lyndal Roper demonstrates both its limits and its value for enriching historical understanding. Keywords: psychohistory, psychoanalysis, history-writing, ego-psychology, Freudian theory, transference. “Clio to thee, O Muse, has been vouchsafed the power to know the hearts of the gods and the ways by which things come to be.” So wrote the Roman Valerius Flaccus in the first century CE.3 In the language of Lacanian psychoanalysis, we might say that this invocation takes the Muse of History to be an (imagined) authoritative subject, she who is supposed to know. Historians become, in this reading, Clio’s analysands, pinning our hopes for enlightenment on the knowl- edge we presume she can impart to us.
    [Show full text]
  • Enjoying What We Don't Have
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters University of Nebraska Press Spring 2013 Enjoying What We Don't Have Todd McGowan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples McGowan, Todd, "Enjoying What We Don't Have" (2013). University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters. 192. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples/192 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Nebraska Press at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Enjoying What We Don’t Have Buy the Book Symplokē Studies in Contemporary Theory Series editor: Jeff rey R. Di Leo Buy the Book Enjoying What We Don’t Have The political project of psychoanalysis Todd McGowan University of Nebraska Press / Lincoln and London Buy the Book © 2013 by the Board of Regents of Library of Congress the University of Nebraska Cataloging-in-Publication Data McGowan, Todd. Acknowledgments for the use of copyrighted Enjoying what we don’t have: the political material appear on page ix, which constitutes project of psychoanalysis / Todd McGowan. an extension of the copyright page. pages cm. — (Symploke studies in contemporary theory) All rights reserved Includes bibliographical refer- Manufactured in the United ences and index. States of America ISBN 978-0-8032-4511-2 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Psychoanalysis—Political aspects. 2. Loss (Psychology) 3. Psychoanalysis and culture. I. Title. Set in Arno by Laura Wellington.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Freud
    POLITICAL FREUD Political Freud A HISTORY Eli Zaretsky Columbia University Press New York Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex cup.columbia.edu Copyright © 2015 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Zaretsky, Eli, author. Political Freud: a history / Eli Zaretsky. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-0-231-17244-8 (cloth: alk. paper) —isbn 978-0-231-54014-8 (e-book) I. Title. [DNLM: 1. Freudian Theory—history. 2. History, 20th century. 3. Politics. 4. Psychoanalysis—history. 5. Psychoanalytic Theory. WM 460.5.F9] 616.89'17—dc23 2015007307 Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. This book is printed on paper with recycled content. Printed in the United States of America c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Jacket design by Philip Pascuzzo References to Web sites (URLs) were accurate at the time of writing. Neither the author nor Columbia University Press is responsible for URLs that may have expired or changed since the manuscript was prepared. For Natasha Zaretsky My Beloved Daughter In 1953 I turned to a deep study of Freud feeling the need to reappraise the nature and destiny of man. Inheriting from the Protestant tradition a con- science, which insisted that intellectual work should be directed toward the relief of man’s estate, I, like many of my generation, lived through the superan- nuation of the political categories which informed liberal thought and action in the 1930s. Those of us who are temperamentally incapable of embracing the politics of sin, cynicism and despair have been compelled to re-examine the classic assumptions about the nature of politics and about the political character of human nature.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Historiography and the Challenge of the Linguistic Turn*
    The History of Historiography and the Challenge of the Linguistic Turn* ______________________________________________________________________ Rogério Forastieri da Silva [email protected] Teacher Colégio Etapa Avenida Liberdade, 1046 01502-001 - São Paulo - SP ______________________________________________________________________Brazil Abstract This exposition examines the relationship between the history of historiography and the linguistic turn, the latter being considered a challenge to the former. At first we attempt to define the meaning of “the viewpoint of the general history of historiography” by taking the history of historiography in its entirety from the Greeks to the present, thereby undermining the credibility of self-proclaimed “ruptures”, “epistemological cuts”, “revolutions”, “mutations” and “new histories” in the recent developments of the general history of historiography, and thus questioning the “scientific” status of the discourse history. In the second section we try to depict the linguistic turn and the nature of the “challenge” it poses to the history of historiography. In the third section, with examples from Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht and Peter Englund, we qualify the role of Hayden White in the formulation of this challenge and its consequences for the practice of the discourse history. The conclusion resumes the arguments of Siegfried Kracauer, Arnaldo Momigliano, Johan Huizinga, Carlo Ginzburg and Hayden White (his in 2011), which combine to reinforce the importance of considering the entirety of the general history of historiography when dealing with the discourse history, conceived as part of an “intermediate domain” that aspires to a scientific status (the 396 commitment to the truth), but which cannot break free from the construction of collective memory or the settling of accounts with the past, hence the approximate nature of historical knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Hayden White's Anthropocentric Posthumanism
    Número especial A História de Hayden White Special issue The History of Hayden White Hayden White’s Anthropocentric Posthumanism Ewa Domanska Práticas da História, n.º 6 (2018): 89-95 www.praticasdahistoria.pt Práticas da História, n.º 6 (2018): 89-95 Ewa Domanska Hayden White’s Anthropocentric Posthumanism This article reflects on Hayden White’s essay “Posthumanism and the Liberation of Humankind” (2000) and indicates its relevance for the current critique of anthropocentrism and on- going discussions about human agency, the non-human condi- tion and posthumanism. It revisits White’s interest in antihu- manism, existentialism, the work of “unbinding” humans from the burden of history and their humanity and the liberating potential of “deonerate art” (White’s term). It problematizes Sartre’s well-known statement and asks: “is man really nothing other than what he makes of himself?” Keywords: Antihumanism; anthropocentrism; existentialism; human agency. O Pós-Humanismo Antropocêntrico de Hayden White Este artigo reflete sobre o ensaio de Hayden White “Posthu- manism and the Liberation of Humankind” (2000), sugerindo que este é relevante para a crítica atual do antropocentrismo e para os debates correntes em torno da agência humana, a condição não-humana e o pós-humanismo. O texto revisita o interesse de White no anti-humanismo, no existencialismo e na tarefa de desvincular os humanos do fardo da história e da sua humanidade, assim como o potencial libertador de “deonerate art” (nas palavras de White). Neste sentido, problematiza a conhecida asserção de Sartre e questiona: “será que o homem não é mesmo nada mais do que aquilo que faz de si mesmo?” Palavras-chave: Anti-humanismo; antropocentrismo; existen- cialismo; agência humana.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aim of Interpretation Is to Create Perplexity in the Face of the Real: Hayden White in Conversation with Erlend Rogne1
    History and Theory 48 (February 2009), 63-75 ? Wesleyan University 2009 ISSN: 0018-2656 THE AIM OF INTERPRETATION IS TO CREATE PERPLEXITY IN THE FACE OF THE REAL: HAYDEN WHITE IN CONVERSATION WITH ERLEND ROGNE1 Keywords: Hayden White, philosophy of history, historiography, modernism, the sublime, structuralism, post-structuralism ER: I'd like to suggest that we begin with what must be a very traditional open ing: with a couple of questions about your academic development. We meet in Rome, and this is also where you published your first essays in the 1950s. It would be interesting to hear where this interest in Continental philosophy came from, especially since Italian and German thinking wasn't held in very high esteem in American historiography at that time. HW: Well, I came to Rome on a Fulbright Scholarship to write my doctoral dissertation in medieval ecclesiastical history, on Gregorian church reforms in the eleventh century and the early twelfth century. The reason I was working on medieval history, and the church especially, was that the Roman Catholic Church was something I knew absolutely nothing about when I went to college. I found it amazing that an institution based upon a miracle, which by definition cannot be comprehended except through faith, could sustain itself and dominate even the monarchs and the political powers for over a thousand years. So I was interested in that, which made me interested in intellectual history, in the history of ideas. And then I was interested in how belief is possible, and especially belief that be gins with the acceptance of a miracle.
    [Show full text]
  • Eros, Civilization and the Burger Court*
    EROS, CIVILIZATION AND THE BURGER COURT* THOMAS C. GREYt I want to offer an interpretation of one aspect of the Burger Court's deci- sions concerning sex, marriage and the family. This area of constitutional law is almost entirely the creation of the Burger Court and it seems to puzzle many people. The puzzle is a double one: why did a conservative Court get into this area at all? And once it got in, why hasn't it carried through with its project, by invalidating the laws that interfere with the private sex lives of consenting adults? The decisions I have in mind have largely been decided under the consti- tutional "right of privacy" introduced by the Warren Court's decision in Griswold v. Connecticut, in which the Court invalidated a Connecticut law pro- hibiting the use of contraceptives, even by married couples.' Of course, Griswold was not the first contact between the Constitution and the law gov- erning family and sexual relations. In the twenties the Court had invalidated two state laws regulating educational practices as unduly restrictive of parental child-rearing authority.2 Then, during the forties, the Court had struck down an Oklahoma sterilization statute under the equal protection clause while ob- serving that marriage and procreation were among "the basic civil rights of man;"'3 and had upheld a child labor statute as applied to young religious proselytizers only after observing that there was a "private realm of family life which the state cannot enter. ' 4 But these were isolated decisions and dicta, never grouped into a common category before Griswold.
    [Show full text]