1 Oneota Settlement Patterns Around Lake Koshkonong

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Oneota Settlement Patterns Around Lake Koshkonong ONEOTA SETTLEMENT PATTERNS AROUND LAKE KOSHKONONG IN SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN: AN ENVIRONMENTAL CATCHMENT ANALYSIS USING GIS MODELING By Richard Wynn Edwards IV A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Anthropology at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee May 2010 1 ONEOTA SETTLEMENT PATTERNS AROUND LAKE KOSHKONONG IN SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN: AN ENVIRONMENTAL CATCHMENT ANALYSIS USING GIS MODELING By Richard Wynn Edwards IV A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Anthropology at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee May 2010 Major Professor Date Graduate School Approval Date ABSTRACT 2 ONEOTA SETTLEMENT PATTERNS AROUND LAKE KOSHKONONG IN SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN: AN ENVIRONMENTAL CATCHMENT ANALYSIS USING GIS MODELING by Richard Wynn Edwards IV The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2010 Under the Supervision of Robert J. Jeske PhD RPA An environmental catchment analysis was conducted to determine the nature of Oneota settlement patterns on the western shore of Lake Koshkonong in Jefferson County, Wisconsin. Previous studies have used coarse-grained analyses which have led to an overgeneralization of Oneota settlement patterns. This research uses a fine-grained analysis to elucidate the variation of Oneota village placement within the study area. Prehistoric vegetation patterns were recreated using the General Land Office Survey notes and soil data. Two kilometer catchments were drawn around four sites; Crescent Bay Hunt Club (47JE904), Schmeling (47JE833), Twin Knolls (47JE379), and the Carcajou Point (47JE002). Analysis of these catchments clarified the nature of environmental variation in Oneota settlement patterns, increasing our understanding of their overall lifeways. Major Professor Date 3 © Copyright by Richard Wynn Edwards IV, 2010 All Rights Reserved 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures _________________________________________________________vii List of Tables ___________________________________________________________x Acknowledgements _____________________________________________________xii Chapter One: Introduction _________________________________________________1 Research Problem _________________________________________________ 1 The Sites _________________________________________________________2 History of Oneota Research__________________________________________ 4 Identifying Oneota Archaeologically ___________________________________7 Wisconsin Oneota _________________________________________________8 Oneota Agriculture ________________________________________________14 Langford ________________________________________________________21 Settlement Patterns of Upper Mississippians ____________________________22 Chapter Two: Methodology and Methods ____________________________________35 Optimal Foraging Theory___________________________________________36 Ecotones________________________________________________________41 Catchment Analysis_______________________________________________42 Reconstructing the Prehistoric Vegetation_____________________________ 46 Vegetation Zones_________________________________________________54 Vegetation Zones as Discrete Resource Zones__________________________ 55 Geographic Information Science/ Systems_____________________________ 57 Resource Pull Analysis____________________________________________ 63 Analysis________________________________________________________ 64 Chapter Three: The Study Sites____________________________________________ 67 The Crescent Bay Hunt Club Site (47JE904) ___________________________ 67 The Schmeling Site (47JE833) ______________________________________ 80 The Twin Knolls Site (47JE379) _____________________________________90 The Carcajou Point Site (47JE002) __________________________________ 100 Chapter Four: Discussion________________________________________________ 111 Question #2: Were each of the sites situated in a similar environment? _____ 111 Question #3: Were the Oneota sites situated to maximize agricultural production?_____________________118 Question #4: What was the nature of the Oneota settlement pattern in the Koshkonong Locality? __________________________ 121 Question #5: How does this settlement pattern compare to previous explanations of Upper Mississippian settlement patterns?_____142 5 Chapter Five: Conclusion_______________________________________________ 146 Summary______________________________________________________ 146 Future Research_________________________________________________ 147 References Cited_______________________________________________________149 Appendix_____________________________________________________________165 6 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Portion of “Original Vegetation Cover”______________________________27 Figure 2: Comparison of GLO Surveyor’s Map and Finley’s (1976) “Original Vegetation Cover”____________________________50 Figure 3: Comparison of GLO and Soil Based Vegetation Map___________________________________________________52 Figure 4: Vegetation Model of Study Area___________________________________53 Figure 5: Map of Case Sites within Study Area______________________________ 68 Figure 6: Location of the Crescent Bay Hunt Club site (47JE904)_________________ 69 Figure 7: Map of Archaeological Investigations at CBHC_______________________ 72 Figure 8: Map of Environmental Zones around Crescent Bay Hunt Club___________75 Figure 9: Map of Ecotones near Crescent Bay Hunt Club________________________76 Figure 10: Map of Agricultural potential near Crescent Bay Hunt Club_____________79 Figure 11: Map of the Schmeling Site’s Location______________________________81 Figure 12: Map of Archaeological Investigations at Schmeling___________________ 82 Figure 13: Map of Environmental Zones around Schmeling______________________85 Figure 14: Map of Ecotones near Schmeling__________________________________ 87 Figure 15: Map of Agricultural potential near Schmeling________________________ 89 Figure 16: Map of the Twin Knolls Site’s Location_____________________________91 Figure 17: Map of Archaeological Investigations at Twin Knolls_________________ 94 Figure 18: Map of Environmental Zones around Twin Knolls____________________ 95 Figure 19: Map of Ecotones near Twin Knolls_________________________________97 Figure 20: Map of Agricultural potential near Twin Knolls_______________________99 7 Figure 21: Map of the Carcajou Point Site’s Location_________________________102 Figure 22: Map of Environmental Zones around Carcajou Point_________________106 Figure 23: Map of Ecotones near Carcajou Point _____________________________108 Figure 24: Map of Agricultural potential near Carcajou Point____________________110 Figure 25: Comparison of Environmental Zones (1km) ________________________112 Figure 26: Comparison of Environmental Zones (2km) ________________________112 Figure 27: Biplot Results of wLRA for Environmental Zones___________________113 Figure 28: Ecotone proportions of 1 km Catchment___________________________115 Figure 29: Ecotone proportions of 2 km Catchment___________________________115 Figure 30: Biplot of Ecotonal Data 1km____________________________________117 Figure 31: Biplot of Ecotonal Data 2km_____________ _______________________117 Figure 32: Biplot of Agricultural Data______________________________________120 Figure 33: Agricultural Potential within 1 km of each site_______________________120 Figure 34: Agricultural Potential within 2 km of each site_______________________121 Figure 35: Topography of land near study sites_______________________________124 Figure 36: Resource Pull Analysis: Geographic Distribution of Scores_____________127 Figure 37: Distribution of Resource Pull Scores (1 km Catchment) _______________128 Figure 38: Distribution of Resource Pull Scores (2 km Catchment) _______________129 Figure 39: Physical Relationship among Study Sites and Garden Bed Sites_________132 Figure 40: Oneota Sites in Study Area______________________________________133 Figure 41: Map Results of Carcajou Point Catchment Analysis__________________138 Figure 42: Map Results of Crescent Bay Hunt Club Catchment Analysis___________139 Figure 43: Map Results of Schmeling Catchment Analysis______________________140 8 Figure 44: Map Results of Twin Knolls Catchment Analysis____________________141 9 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Oneota Site Types________________________________________________30 Table 2: Faunal Remains Recovered from Crescent Bay Hunt Club_______________ 73 Table 3: Environmental Zones within Crescent Bay Hunt Club Catchments_________ 74 Table 4: Ecotones within the Crescent Bay Hunt Club Catchments________________ 77 Table 5: Arable Land within the Crescent Bay Hunt Club Catchments______________78 Table 6: Faunal Remains Recovered from the Schmeling Site____________________83 Table 7: Environmental Zones within Schmeling Catchments_____________________84 Table 8: Ecotones within the Schmeling Catchments____________________________86 Table 9: Arable Land within the Schmeling Catchments_________________________88 Table 10: Environmental Zones within Twin Knolls Catchments__________________96 Table 11: Ecotones within the Twin Knolls Catchments_________________________98 Table 12: Arable Land within the Twin Knolls Catchments ______________________99 Table 13: Faunal Remains Recovered from the Carcajou Point Site_______________104 Table 14: Environmental Zones within Carcajou Point Catchments_______________ 105 Table 15: Ecotones within the Carcajou Point Catchments______________________107
Recommended publications
  • Geospatial Considerations Involving Historic General Land Office Maps and Late Prehistoric Bison Remains Near La Crosse, Wisconsin
    Field Notes: A Journal of Collegiate Anthropology Volume 10 Article 11 2019 Geospatial Considerations Involving Historic General Land Office Maps and Late Prehistoric Bison Remains Near La Crosse, Wisconsin Andrew M. Saleh University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/fieldnotes Recommended Citation Saleh, Andrew M. (2019) "Geospatial Considerations Involving Historic General Land Office Maps and Late Prehistoric Bison Remains Near La Crosse, Wisconsin," Field Notes: A Journal of Collegiate Anthropology: Vol. 10 , Article 11. Available at: https://dc.uwm.edu/fieldnotes/vol10/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Field Notes: A Journal of Collegiate Anthropology by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Analyzing Late Prehistoric Bison bison Remains near La Crosse, Wisconsin using Historic General Land Office Maps Andrew M. Saleh University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, USA Abstract: This study used geographic information systems, pre- historic archaeological contexts, and historic General Land Of- fice (GLO) maps to conduct a pilot inter-site analysis involving La Crosse, Wisconsin area Oneota sites with reported Bison bi- son remains as of 2014. Scholars in and around Wisconsin con- tinually discuss the potential reasons why bison remains appear in late prehistoric contexts. This analysis continued that discus- sion with updated methods and vegetation data and provides a case study showing the strength of using historic GLO maps in conjunction with archaeological studies. This research suggests that creating your own maps in coordination with the GLO’s publicly available original surveyor data is more accurate than using the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) vegetation polygon that cites the same data.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Density Populations of Color
    Legend Legend Population Density Highest Population Density Populations of Color Sonside Park Lowest Population Density Duluth Heights School Æc Library Kenwood Hospital or Clinic Recreational Trail Rice Lake Park Woodland Athletic Lake Complex Park Annex Pleasant View Park Bayview Duluth Heights Community Heights Recreation Cntr Hartley Field Hartley Park Downer Park Janette Cody Pennel Park Pollay Arlington Park Piedmont Athletic Complex Morley Heights Hts/Parkview Oneota Park Piedmont Hunters Community Recreation Center Park Bagley Nature Area (UMD) Brewer Park Chester Park Bellevue Park Amity Park Amity Creek Park Enger Chester Quarry Municipal Copeland Lakeview Park Community Grant Community Park Golf Course Center Recreation Center Park-UMD Enger Hawk Park Ridge Hawk Ridge Nature Reserve Hilltop Park East Hillside Lincoln Congdon Park Old Park Main Cascade Park Park Portland Wheeler Square Athletic Washington Congdon Complex Central Com Rec Memorial Ctr Community Recreation Center Denfeld Hillside Park Lakeside-Lester Central Park Park Russell Midtown Civic Square Spirit Park Center Point of Rocks Park Valley Wade Sports Point of Complex Rocks Park Manchester Lincoln Square Lake Place Plaza Endion Leif Erickson Rose Garden Park Corner of Park the Lake CBD Park Lakewalk Washington East Square Irving Bayfront Park Oneota Grosvenor Square Lester/Amity Park Canal Park North Shore University Park Kitchi Gammi Park Franklin Park 46% of Duluth's populations of color live in Lincoln Park, Central Hillside, and East Hillside, while only Park 24% of Duluth's total population lives in these three Rice's Point Boat Landing Point neighborhoods. Data Source: Minnesota Population Center. National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 2.0 ± Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • MCJA Book Reviews Volume 39, 2014
    OPEN ACCESS: MCJA Book Reviews Volume 39, 2014 Copyright © 2014 Midwest Archaeological Conference, Inc. All rights reserved. The Hoxie Farm Site Fortified Village: Late Fisher Phase Occupation and Fortification in South Chicago edited by Douglas K. Jackson and Thomas E. Emerson with contributions by Douglas K. Jackson. Thomas E. Emerson, Madeleine Evans, Ian Fricker, Kathryn C. Egan-Bruhy, Michael L. Hargrave, Terrance J. Martin, Kjersti E. Emerson, Eve A. Hargrave, Kris Hedman, Stephanie Daniels, Brenda Beck, Amanda Butler, Jennifer Howe, and Jean Nelson Research Report No. 27 Thomas E. Emerson, Ph.D. Principal Investigator and Survey Director Illinois State Archaeological Survey A Division of the Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Investigations Conducted by: Illinois State Archaeological Survey University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Investigations Conducted Under the Auspices of: The State of Illinois Department of Transportation Brad H. Koldehoff Chief Archaeologist 2013 Contents List of Figures ...............................................................................................................................ix List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... xv Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... xix 1 Introduction Douglas K. Jackson ..................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Summary
    Travel Summary – All Trips and Day Trips Retirement 2016-2020 Trips (28) • Relatives 2016-A (R16A), September 30-October 20, 2016, 21 days, 441 photos • Anza-Borrego Desert 2016-A (A16A), November 13-18, 2016, 6 days, 711 photos • Arizona 2017-A (A17A), March 19-24, 2017, 6 days, 692 photos • Utah 2017-A (U17A), April 8-23, 2017, 16 days, 2214 photos • Tonopah 2017-A (T17A), May 14-19, 2017, 6 days, 820 photos • Nevada 2017-A (N17A), June 25-28, 2017, 4 days, 515 photos • New Mexico 2017-A (M17A), July 13-26, 2017, 14 days, 1834 photos • Great Basin 2017-A (B17A), August 13-21, 2017, 9 days, 974 photos • Kanab 2017-A (K17A), August 27-29, 2017, 3 days, 172 photos • Fort Worth 2017-A (F17A), September 16-29, 2017, 14 days, 977 photos • Relatives 2017-A (R17A), October 7-27, 2017, 21 days, 861 photos • Arizona 2018-A (A18A), February 12-17, 2018, 6 days, 403 photos • Mojave Desert 2018-A (M18A), March 14-19, 2018, 6 days, 682 photos • Utah 2018-A (U18A), April 11-27, 2018, 17 days, 1684 photos • Europe 2018-A (E18A), June 27-July 25, 2018, 29 days, 3800 photos • Kanab 2018-A (K18A), August 6-8, 2018, 3 days, 28 photos • California 2018-A (C18A), September 5-15, 2018, 11 days, 913 photos • Relatives 2018-A (R18A), October 1-19, 2018, 19 days, 698 photos • Arizona 2019-A (A19A), February 18-20, 2019, 3 days, 127 photos • Texas 2019-A (T19A), March 18-April 1, 2019, 15 days, 973 photos • Death Valley 2019-A (D19A), April 4-5, 2019, 2 days, 177 photos • Utah 2019-A (U19A), April 19-May 3, 2019, 15 days, 1482 photos • Europe 2019-A (E19A), July
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Midwest Archaeological Conference Program
    Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 47 2004 Program and Abstracts of the Fiftieth Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Sixty-First Southeastern Archaeological Conference October 20 – 23, 2004 St. Louis Marriott Pavilion Downtown St. Louis, Missouri Edited by Timothy E. Baumann, Lucretia S. Kelly, and John E. Kelly Hosted by Department of Anthropology, Washington University Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-St. Louis Timothy E. Baumann, Program Chair John E. Kelly and Timothy E. Baumann, Co-Organizers ISSN-0584-410X Floor Plan of the Marriott Hotel First Floor Second Floor ii Preface WELCOME TO ST. LOUIS! This joint conference of the Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Southeastern Archaeological Conference marks the second time that these two prestigious organizations have joined together. The first was ten years ago in Lexington, Kentucky and from all accounts a tremendous success. Having the two groups meet in St. Louis is a first for both groups in the 50 years that the Midwest Conference has been in existence and the 61 years that the Southeastern Archaeological Conference has met since its inaugural meeting in 1938. St. Louis hosted the first Midwestern Conference on Archaeology sponsored by the National Research Council’s Committee on State Archaeological Survey 75 years ago. Parts of the conference were broadcast across the airwaves of KMOX radio, thus reaching a larger audience. Since then St. Louis has been host to two Society for American Archaeology conferences in 1976 and 1993 as well as the Society for Historical Archaeology’s conference in 2004. When we proposed this joint conference three years ago we felt it would serve to again bring people together throughout most of the mid-continent.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Truck Route Study
    Duluth-Superior Area Study $ # $ $$ $ # # # # # # # # â 1 â3 $ # 15 $ # $ # $ $ â # $ # 16 # $ $ â $ #$ $ # 7 $ $ # # $$ 14 $ â $ # $ $ $ # $ # $ â # $#$# # $ # $$ ## # #$ 8 # # # # â# # # # # #$# # # # # # $# ## #$$ # $$# # $ # # ### 9 #### # # # # ## # # # â #$$ #$#$ # # # ## $$ #### $ $$## $ #$$## $ $ #$ ## #$$ ##$$#$# ## $$$ $ ### $ $$$ ## #$# $ # ### $ ## $$# # # $$#$## # # $$ $# $ $ $ # ######## $# #$# $ #13 # 5 ## #######$####$# # # $$ # $ $ 6 #$###$#####$$## #$ # # # #â#### â ## ##$ $###11# $ â # $$ # ## ### ## $# # ##$ â# $ # 4 # ####### # # # ## #####$########## # # # ###### ## ######## ## â # ## # # 2 $ # # # $# # # # ### ## # # # â # ##### # # ### # # $ $ # $ $## $# # # # $ $ # $ # # # # # ## $ $ ## $# # $ # # 12# # $ # # â # # $ â10 Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Interstate Committee Approved April 18, 2001 Duluth-Superior Truck Route Study Approved April 18, 2001 Prepared by the Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Interstate Committee Duluth Superior urban area communities cooperating in planning and development through a joint venture of the Arrowhead Regional Development Commission and the Northwest Regional Planning Commission This study was funded through the Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Interstate Committee with funding from the: Federal Highway Administration Minnesota Department of Transportation Wisconsin Department of Transportation Arrowhead Regional Development Commission Northwest Regional Planning Commission Copies of the study are available from the Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Interstate Committee 221 West 1st Street,
    [Show full text]
  • CRM: the Journal of Heritage Stewardship Volume 3 Number I Winter 2006 Editorial Board Contributing Editors
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior CRM: The Journal of Heritage Stewardship Volume 3 Number i Winter 2006 Editorial Board Contributing Editors David G. Anderson, Ph.D. Megan Brown Department of Anthropology, Historic Preservation Grants, University of Tennessee National Park Service Gordon W. Fulton Timothy M. Davis, Ph.D. National Park Service National Historic Sites Park Historic Structures and U.S. Department of the Interior Directorate, Parks Canada Cultural Landscapes, National Park Service Cultural Resources Art Gomez, Ph.D. Intermountain Regional Elaine Jackson-Retondo, Gale A. Norton Office, National Park Service Ph.D. Secretary of the Interior Pacific West Regional Office, Michael Holleran, Ph.D. National Park Service Fran P. Mainella Department of Planning and Director, National Park Design, University of J. Lawrence Lee, Ph.D., P.E. Service Colorado, Denver Heritage Documentation Programs, Janet Snyder Matthews, Elizabeth A. Lyon, Ph.D. National Park Service Ph.D. Independent Scholar; Former Associate Director, State Historic Preservation Barbara J. Little, Ph.D. Cultural Resources Officer, Georgia Archeological Assistance Programs, Frank G. Matero, Ph.D. National Park Service Historic Preservation CRM: The Journal of Program, University of David Louter, Ph.D. Heritage Stewardship Pennsylvania Pacific West Regional Office, National Park Service Winter 2006 Moises Rosas Silva, Ph.D. ISSN 1068-4999 Instutito Nacional de Chad Randl Antropologia e Historia, Heritage Preservation Sue Waldron Mexico Service, Publisher National Park Service Jim W Steely Dennis | Konetzka | Design SWCA Environmental Daniel J. Vivian Group, LLC Consultants, Phoenix, National Register of Historic Design Arizona Places/National Historic Landmarks, Diane Vogt-O'Connor National Park Service National Archives and Staff Records Administration Antoinette J.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasting and Communal Ritual in the Lower Mississippi Valley, Ad 700–1000
    FEASTING AND COMMUNAL RITUAL IN THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY, AD 700–1000 Megan Crandal Kassabaum A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2014 Approved by: Vincas P. Steponaitis C. Margaret Scarry Dale L. Hutchinson Brett H. Riggs Valerie Lambert © 2014 Megan Crandal Kassabaum ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Megan Crandal Kassabaum: Feasting and Communal Ritual in the Lower Mississippi Valley, AD 700–1000 (Under the direction of Vincas P. Steponaitis) This dissertation examines prehistoric activity at the Feltus site (22Je500) in Jefferson County, Mississippi, to elucidate how Coles Creek (AD 700–1200) platform mound sites were used. Data from excavations undertaken by the Feltus Archaeological Project from 2006 to 2012 support the conclusion that Coles Creek people utilized Feltus episodically for some 400 years, with little evidence of permanent habitation. More specifically, the ceramic, floral, and faunal data suggest that Feltus provided a location for periodic ritual events focused around food consumption, post-setting, and mound building. The rapidity with which the middens at Feltus were deposited and the large size of the ceramic vessels implies that the events occurring there brought together large groups of people for massive feasting episodes. The vessel form assemblage is dominated by open bowls and thus suggests an emphasis on food consumption, with less evidence for food preparation and virtually none for food storage. Overall, the ceramic assemblage emphasizes a great deal of continuity in the use of the Feltus landscape from the earliest occupation, during the Hamilton Ridge phase, through the latest, during the Balmoral phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence and Environmental Stress During the Late Fort Ancient (AD 1425 - 1635) Occupations of Hardin Village
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 5-1-2019 The Bioarchaeology of Instability: Violence and Environmental Stress During the Late Fort Ancient (AD 1425 - 1635) Occupations of Hardin Village Amber Elaine Osterholt Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons Repository Citation Osterholt, Amber Elaine, "The Bioarchaeology of Instability: Violence and Environmental Stress During the Late Fort Ancient (AD 1425 - 1635) Occupations of Hardin Village" (2019). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 3656. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/15778514 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BIOARCHAEOLOGY OF INSTABILITY: VIOLENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS DURING THE LATE FORT ANCIENT (AD 1425 – 1635) OCCUPATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Place-Names in Mississippi. Lea Leslie Seale Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1939 Indian Place-Names in Mississippi. Lea Leslie Seale Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Seale, Lea Leslie, "Indian Place-Names in Mississippi." (1939). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 7812. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/7812 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MANUSCRIPT THESES Unpublished theses submitted for the master^ and doctorfs degrees and deposited in the Louisiana State University Library are available for inspection* Use of any thesis is limited by the rights of the author* Bibliographical references may be noted3 but passages may not be copied unless the author has given permission# Credit must be given in subsequent written or published work# A library which borrows this thesis for vise by its clientele is expected to make sure that the borrower is aware of the above restrictions, LOUISIANA. STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 119-a INDIAN PLACE-NAMES IN MISSISSIPPI A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisian© State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of English By Lea L # Seale M* A*, Louisiana State University* 1933 1 9 3 9 UMi Number: DP69190 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Community and Cosmos: a Bioarchaeological Analysis of Wisconsin Effigy Mound Mortuary Practices and Mound Construction
    CONSTRUCTING COMMUNITY AND COSMOS: A BIOARCHAEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF WISCONSIN EFFIGY MOUND MORTUARY PRACTICES AND MOUND CONSTRUCTION By Wendy Lee Lackey-Cornelison A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILSOPHY Anthropology 2012 ABSTRACT CONSTRUCTING COMMUNITY AND COSMOS: A BIOARCHAEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF WISCONSIN EFFIGY MOUND MORTUARY PRACTICES AND MOUND CONSTRUCTION By Wendy Lee Lackey-Cornelison This dissertation presents an analysis of the mounds, human skeletal remains, grave goods, and ritual paraphernalia interred within mounds traditionally categorized as belonging to the Wisconsin Effigy Mound Tradition. The term ‘Effigy Mound Tradition’ commonly refers to a widespread mound building and ritual phenomenon that spanned the Upper Midwest during the Late Woodland (A.D. 600-A.D. 1150). Specifically, this study explores how features of mound construction and burial may have operated in the social structure of communities participating in this panregional ceremonial movement. The study uses previously excavated skeletal material, published archaeological reports, unpublished field notes, and photographs housed at the Milwaukee Public Museum to examine the social connotations of various mound forms and mortuary ritual among Wisconsin Effigy Mound communities. The archaeological and skeletal datasets consisted of data collected from seven mound sites with an aggregate sample of 197 mounds and a minimum number of individuals of 329. The mortuary analysis in this study explores whether the patterning of human remains interred within mounds were part of a system involved with the 1) creation of collective/ corporate identity, 2) denoting individual distinction and/or social inequality, or 3) a combination of both processes occurring simultaneously within Effigy Mound communities.
    [Show full text]
  • 1990 Midwest Archaeological Conference Program
    MIDWEST ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE 35th ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS October 5-6, 1990 Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois REF Conferenc MAC 1990 I ~~F ~e,.A.~~ rt.AC. ~ MIDWEST ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE 35th ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM October 5-6, 1990 Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois ARCHIVES Office of the State Archaeologist The University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52242 35th MIDWEST ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY October 5-6, 1990 Friday Morning - OCTOBER 5, 1990 [ 1 ] General Session: HISTORIC PERIOD RESEARCH Norris, McCormick Auditorium Chairperson: Rochelle Lurie 1 0 :00 Steven Hackenberger; MACKTOWN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS, WINNEBAGO COUNTY, IWNOIS 10:20 Mark E. Esarey; 1989 EXCAVATIONS AT FT.GRATIOT, PORT HURON, MICHIGAN 10:40 Floyd Mansberger and Joseph Phllllppe; THE EARLY 1870S FARMER'S MARKET: CERAMICAVAIIJ\8I1..lTY' AND ECONOMIC SCALING AT THE FARMERS HOME HOTEL. GALENA, IWNOIS 11 :00 Break 11 :20 Marilyn R. Orr and Myra J. Giesen; STATURE VARIATION AMONG AMERICAN CIVIL WAR SOLDIERS 11 :40 Mark Madsen end Kevin Christensen; A GREAT LAKES FORE-AFT RIGGED SCHOONER FROM THE MID-19TH CENTURY [ 2 J General Session: NEW IDEAS ON OLD PROBLEMS Norris, 2C 1 0 :20 J. Peter Denny; THE ALGONQUIAN MIGRATION FROM THE COLUMBIA PLATEAU TO THE MIDWEST, CIRCA 1800 B.C.: CORRELATING LINGUISTICS AND ARCHAEOLOGY 1 0 :40 James A. Marshall; THE PREHISTORIC PARALLEL STRAIGHT WALLS OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA EXAMINED FOR ASTRONOMICALORIENrATIONS 11 :00 Harry Murphy; BUREAUCRACY, THE AGENCY ARCHAEOLOGIST, AND
    [Show full text]